The GPCR–β-arrestin complex allosterically activates C-Raf by binding its amino terminus

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) convert external stimuli into cellular signals through heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) and β-arrestins (βarrs). In a βarr-dependent signaling pathway, βarrs link GPCRs to various downstream signaling partners, such as the Raf–mitogen-activated protein kinase extracellular signal–regulated kinase–extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade. Agonist-stimulated GPCR–βarr complexes have been shown to interact with C-Raf and are thought to initiate the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway through simple tethering of these signaling partners. However, recent evidence shows that in addition to canonical scaffolding functions, βarrs can allosterically activate downstream targets, such as the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Src. Here, we demonstrate the direct allosteric activation of C-Raf by GPCR–βarr1 complexes in vitro. Furthermore, we show that βarr1 in complex with a synthetic phosphopeptide mimicking the human V2 vasopressin receptor tail that binds and functionally activates βarrs also allosterically activates C-Raf. We reveal that the interaction between the phosphorylated GPCR C terminus and βarr1 is necessary and sufficient for C-Raf activation. Interestingly, the interaction between βarr1 and C-Raf was considerably reduced in the presence of excess activated H-Ras, a small GTPase known to activate C-Raf, suggesting that H-Ras and βarr1 bind to the same region on C-Raf. Furthermore, we found that βarr1 interacts with the Ras-binding domain of C-Raf. Taken together, these data suggest that in addition to canonical scaffolding functions, GPCR–βarr complexes directly allosterically activate C-Raf by binding to its amino terminus. This work provides novel insights into how βarrs regulate effector molecules to activate downstream signaling pathways.     

A model for how Gβγ couples Gα to GPCR

Representing ∼5% of the human genome, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a primary target for drug discovery; however, the molecular details of how they couple to heterotrimeric G protein subunits are incompletely understood. Here, I propose a hypothetical initial docking model for the encounter between GPCR and Gβγ that is defined by transient interactions between the cytosolic surface of the GPCR and the prenyl moiety and the tripeptide motif, asparagine–proline–phenylalanine (NPF), in the C-terminus of the Gγ subunit. Analysis of class A GPCRs reveals a conserved NPF binding site formed by the interaction of the TM1 and H8. Functional studies using differentially prenylated proteins and peptides further suggest that the intracellular hydrophobic core of the GPCR is a prenyl binding site. Upon binding TM1 and H8 of GPCRs, the propensity of the C-terminal region of Gγ to convert into an α helix allows it to extend into the hydrophobic core of the GPCR, facilitating the GPCR active state. Conservation of the NPF motif in Gγ isoforms and interacting residues in TM1 and H8 suggest that this is a general mechanism of GPCR–G protein signaling. Analysis of the rhodopsin dimer also suggests that Gγ–rhodopsin interactions may facilitate GPCR dimer transactivation.     

Cannabinoid receptor interacting protein 1a interacts with myristoylated Gαi N terminus via a unique gapped β-barrel structure

Cannabinoid receptor interacting protein 1a (CRIP1a) modulates CB₁ cannabinoid receptor G-protein coupling in part by altering the selectivity for Gα_i subtype activation, but the molecular basis for this function of CRIP1a is not known. We report herein the first structure of CRIP1a at a resolution of 1.55 Å. CRIP1a exhibits a 10-stranded and antiparallel β-barrel with an interior comprised of conserved hydrophobic residues and loops at the bottom and a short helical cap at the top to exclude solvent. The β-barrel has a gap between strands β8 and β10, which deviates from β-sandwich fatty acid–binding proteins that carry endocannabinoid compounds and the Rho-guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor predicted by computational threading algorithms. The structural homology search program DALI identified CRIP1a as homologous to a family of lipidated-protein carriers that includes phosphodiesterase 6 delta subunit and Unc119. Comparison with these proteins suggests that CRIP1a may carry two possible types of cargo: either (i) like phosphodiesterase 6 delta subunit, cargo with a farnesyl moiety that enters from the top of the β-barrel to occupy the hydrophobic interior or (ii) like Unc119, cargo with a palmitoyl or a myristoyl moiety that enters from the side where the missing β-strand creates an opening to the hydrophobic pocket. Fluorescence polarization analysis demonstrated CRIP1a binding of an N-terminally myristoylated 9-mer peptide mimicking the Gα_i N terminus. However, CRIP1a could not bind the nonmyristolyated Gα_i peptide or cargo of homologs. Thus, binding of CRIP1a to Gαi proteins represents a novel mechanism to regulate cell signaling initiated by the CB₁ receptor.     

A naturally occurring membrane-anchored Gαs variant,XLαs,activates phospholipase Cβ4

Extra-large stimulatory Gα (XLα_s) is a large variant of G protein α_s subunit (Gα_s) that uses an alternative promoter and thus differs from Gα_s at the first exon. XLα_s activation by G protein–coupled receptors mediates cAMP generation, similarly to Gα_s; however, Gα_s and XLα_s have been shown to have distinct cellular and physiological functions. For example, previous work suggests that XLα_s can stimulate inositol phosphate production in renal proximal tubules and thereby regulate serum phosphate levels. In this study, we show that XLα_s directly and specifically stimulates a specific isoform of phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ), PLCβ4, both in transfected cells and with purified protein components. We demonstrate that neither the ability of XLα_s to activate cAMP generation nor the canonical G protein switch II regions are required for PLCβ stimulation. Furthermore, this activation is nucleotide independent but is inhibited by Gβγ, suggesting a mechanism of activation that relies on Gβγ subunit dissociation. Surprisingly, our results indicate that enhanced membrane targeting of XLα_s relative to Gα_s confers the ability to activate PLCβ4. We also show that PLCβ4 is required for isoproterenol-induced inositol phosphate accumulation in osteocyte-like Ocy454 cells. Taken together, we demonstrate a novel mechanism for activation of phosphoinositide turnover downstream of G_s-coupled receptors that may have a critical role in endocrine physiology.     

A short C-terminal peptide in Gγ regulates Gβγ signaling efficacy

G protein beta-gamma (Gβγ) subunits anchor to the plasma membrane (PM) through the carboxy-terminal (CT) prenyl group in Gγ. This interaction is crucial for the PM localization and functioning of Gβγ, allowing GPCR-G protein signaling to proceed. The diverse Gγ family has 12 members, and we have recently shown that the signaling efficacies of major Gβγ effectors are Gγ-type dependent. This dependency is due to the distinct series of membrane-interacting abilities of Gγ. However, the molecular process allowing for Gβγ subunits to exhibit a discrete and diverse range of Gγ-type–dependent membrane affinities is unclear and cannot be explained using only the type of prenylation. The present work explores the unique designs of membrane-interacting CT residues in Gγ as a major source for this Gγ-type–dependent Gβγ signaling. Despite the type of prenylation, the results show signaling efficacy at the PM, and associated cell behaviors of Gβγ are governed by crucially located specific amino acids in the five to six residue preprenylation region of Gγ. The provided molecular picture of Gγ–membrane interactions may explain how cells gain Gγ-type–dependent G protein-GPCR signaling as well as how Gβγ elicits selective signaling at various subcellular compartments.     

Designer proteins that competitively inhibit Gαq by targeting its effector site

During signal transduction, the G protein, Gα_q, binds and activates phospholipase C-β isozymes. Several diseases have been shown to manifest upon constitutively activating mutation of Gα_q, such as uveal melanoma. Therefore, methods are needed to directly inhibit Gα_q. Previously, we demonstrated that a peptide derived from a helix-turn-helix (HTH) region of PLC-β3 (residues 852–878) binds Gα_q with low micromolar affinity and inhibits Gα_q by competing with full-length PLC-β isozymes for binding. Since the HTH peptide is unstructured in the absence of Gα_q, we hypothesized that embedding the HTH in a folded protein might stabilize the binding-competent conformation and further improve the potency of inhibition. Using the molecular modeling software Rosetta, we searched the Protein Data Bank for proteins with similar HTH structures near their surface. The candidate proteins were computationally docked against Gα_q, and their surfaces were redesigned to stabilize this interaction. We then used yeast surface display to affinity mature the designs. The most potent design bound Gα_q/i with high affinity in vitro (K_D = 18 nM) and inhibited activation of PLC-β isozymes in HEK293 cells. We anticipate that our genetically encoded inhibitor will help interrogate the role of Gα_q in healthy and disease model systems. Our work demonstrates that grafting interaction motifs into folded proteins is a powerful approach for generating inhibitors of protein–protein interactions.     

Selection of Gβ Subunits with Point Mutations That Fail to Activate Specific Signaling Pathways In Vivo: Dissecting Cellular Responses Mediated by a Heterotrimeric G Protein in Dictyostelium discoideum

In Dictyostelium discoideum, a unique Gβ subunit is required for a G protein–coupled receptor system that mediates a variety of cellular responses. Binding of cAMP to cAR1, the receptor linked to the G protein G2, triggers a cascade of responses, including activation of adenylyl cyclase, gene induction, actin polymerization, and chemotaxis. Null mutations of the cAR1, Gα2, and Gβ genes completely impair all these responses. To dissect specificity in Gβγ signaling to downstream effectors in living cells, we screened a randomly mutagenized library of Gβ genes and isolated Gβ alleles that lacked the capacity to activate some effectors but retained the ability to regulate others. These mutant Gβ subunits were able to link cAR1 to G2, to support gene expression, and to mediate cAMP-induced actin polymerization, and some were able to mediate to chemotaxis toward cAMP. None was able to activate adenylyl cyclase, and some did not support chemotaxis. Thus, we separated in vivo functions of Gβγ by making point mutations on Gβ. Using the structure of the heterotrimeric G protein displayed in the computer program CHAIN, we examined the positions and the molecular interactions of the amino acids substituted in each of the mutant Gβs and analyzed the possible effects of each replacement. We identified several residues that are crucial for activation of the adenylyl cyclase. These residues formed an area that overlaps but is not identical to regions where bovine Gtβγ interacts with its regulators, Gα and phosducin.     

Gβγ regulates mitotic Golgi fragmentation and G2/M cell cycle progression

Heterotrimeric G proteins (αβγ) function at the cytoplasmic surface of a cell’s plasma membrane to transduce extracellular signals into cellular responses. However, numerous studies indicate that G proteins also play noncanonical roles at unique intracellular locations. Previous work has established that G protein βγ subunits (Gβγ) regulate a signaling pathway on the cytoplasmic surface of Golgi membranes that controls the exit of select protein cargo. Now, we demonstrate a novel role for Gβγ in regulating mitotic Golgi fragmentation, a key checkpoint of the cell cycle that occurs in the late G2 phase. We show that small interfering RNA–mediated depletion of Gβ1 and Gβ2 in synchronized cells causes a decrease in the number of cells with fragmented Golgi in late G2 and a delay of entry into mitosis and progression through G2/M. We also demonstrate that during G2/M Gβγ acts upstream of protein kinase D and regulates the phosphorylation of the Golgi structural protein GRASP55. Expression of Golgi-targeted GRK2ct, a Gβγ-sequestering protein used to inhibit Gβγ signaling, also causes a decrease in Golgi fragmentation and a delay in mitotic progression. These results highlight a novel role for Gβγ in regulation of Golgi structure.     

Human C1orf27 protein interacts with α2A-adrenergic receptor and regulates its anterograde transport

The molecular mechanisms underlying the anterograde surface transport of G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) after their synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are not well defined. In C. elegans, odorant response abnormal 4 has been implicated in the delivery of olfactory GPCRs to the cilia of chemosensory neurons. However, the function and regulation of its human homolog, C1orf27, in GPCR transport or in general membrane trafficking remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate that siRNA-mediated knockdown of C1orf27 markedly impedes the ER-to-Golgi export kinetics of newly synthesized α_2A-adrenergic receptor (α_2A-AR), a prototypic GPCR, with the half-time being prolonged by more than 65%, in mammalian cells in retention using the selective hooks assays. Using modified bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays and ELISAs, we also show that C1orf27 knockdown significantly inhibits the surface transport of α_2A-AR. Similarly, C1orf27 knockout by CRISPR-Cas9 markedly suppresses the ER–Golgi-surface transport of α_2A-AR. In addition, we demonstrate that C1orf27 depletion attenuates the export of β₂-AR and dopamine D2 receptor but not of epidermal growth factor receptor. We further show that C1orf27 physically associates with α_2A-AR, specifically via its third intracellular loop and C terminus. Taken together, these data demonstrate an important role of C1orf27 in the trafficking of nascent GPCRs from the ER to the cell surface through the Golgi and provide novel insights into the regulation of the biosynthesis and anterograde transport of the GPCR family members.     

Self-activating G protein α subunits engage seven-transmembrane regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins and a Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor effector in the amoeba Naegleria fowleri

The free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri is a causative agent of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis and is highly resistant to current therapies, resulting in mortality rates >97%. As many therapeutics target G protein–centered signal transduction pathways, further understanding the functional significance of G protein signaling within N. fowleri should aid future drug discovery against this pathogen. Here, we report that the N. fowleri genome encodes numerous transcribed G protein signaling components, including G protein–coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G protein subunits, regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, and candidate Gα effector proteins. We found N. fowleri Gα subunits have diverse nucleotide cycling kinetics; Nf Gα5 and Gα7 exhibit more rapid nucleotide exchange than GTP hydrolysis (i.e., “self-activating” behavior). A crystal structure of Nf Gα7 highlights the stability of its nucleotide-free state, consistent with its rapid nucleotide exchange. Variations in the phosphate binding loop also contribute to nucleotide cycling differences among Gα subunits. Similar to plant G protein signaling pathways, N. fowleri Gα subunits selectively engage members of a large seven-transmembrane RGS protein family, resulting in acceleration of GTP hydrolysis. We show Nf Gα2 and Gα3 directly interact with a candidate Gα effector protein, RGS-RhoGEF, similar to mammalian Gα_12/13 signaling pathways. We demonstrate Nf Gα2 and Gα3 each engage RGS-RhoGEF through a canonical Gα/RGS domain interface, suggesting a shared evolutionary origin with G protein signaling in the enteric pathogen Entamoeba histolytica. These findings further illuminate the evolution of G protein signaling and identify potential targets of pharmacological manipulation in N. fowleri.     

Structural basis for the interaction of SARS‐CoV‐2 virulence factor nsp1 with DNA polymerase α–primase

The molecular mechanisms that drive the infection by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2)—the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)—are under intense current scrutiny to understand how the virus operates and to uncover ways in which the disease can be prevented or alleviated. Recent proteomic screens of the interactions between viral and host proteins have identified the human proteins targeted by SARS‐CoV‐2. The DNA polymerase α (Pol α)–primase complex or primosome—responsible for initiating DNA synthesis during genomic duplication—was identified as a target of nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1), a major virulence factor in the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Here, we validate the published reports of the interaction of nsp1 with the primosome by demonstrating direct binding with purified recombinant components and providing a biochemical characterization of their interaction. Furthermore, we provide a structural basis for the interaction by elucidating the cryo‐electron microscopy structure of nsp1 bound to the primosome. Our findings provide biochemical evidence for the reported targeting of Pol α by the virulence factor nsp1 and suggest that SARS‐CoV‐2 interferes with Pol α''s putative role in the immune response during the viral infection.     

Up-regulation of Hyperpolarization-activated Cyclic Nucleotide-gated Channel 3 (HCN3) by Specific Interaction with K+ Channel Tetramerization Domain-containing Protein 3 (KCTD3)

Most ion channels consist of the principal ion-permeating core subunit(s) and accessory proteins that are assembled with the channel core. The biological functions of the latter proteins are diverse and include the regulation of the biophysical properties of the ion channel, its connection to signaling pathways and the control of its cell surface expression. There is recent evidence that native hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel complexes (HCN1–4) also contain accessory subunits, among which TRIP8b (tetratricopeptide repeat-containing Rab8b-interacting protein) has been most extensively studied. Here, we identify KCTD3, a so far uncharacterized member of the potassium channel tetramerization-domain containing (KCTD) protein family as an HCN3-interacting protein. KCTD3 is widely expressed in brain and some non-neuronal tissues and colocalizes with HCN3 in specific regions of the brain including hypothalamus. Within the HCN channel family, KCTD3 specifically binds to HCN3 and leads to a profound up-regulation of cell surface expression and current density of this channel. HCN3 can also functionally interact with TRIP8b; however, we found no evidence for channel complexes containing both TRIP8b and KCTD3. The C terminus of HCN3 is crucially required for functional interaction with KCTD3. Replacement of the cytosolic C terminus of HCN2 by the corresponding domain of HCN3 renders HCN2 sensitive to regulation by KCTD3. The C-terminal-half of KCTD3 is sufficient for binding to HCN3. However, the complete protein including the N-terminal tetramerization domain is needed for HCN3 current up-regulation. Together, our experiments indicate that KCTD3 is an accessory subunit of native HCN3 complexes.     

Characterization of interactions within the Igα/Igβ transmembrane domains of the human B-cell receptor provides insights into receptor assembly

The B-cell receptor (BCR), a complex comprised of a membrane-associated immunoglobulin and the Igα/β heterodimer, is one of the most important immune receptors in humans and controls B-cell development, activity, selection, and death. BCR signaling plays key roles in autoimmune diseases and lymphoproliferative disorders, yet, despite the clinical significance of this protein complex, key regions (i.e., the transmembrane domains) have yet to be structurally characterized. The mechanism for BCR signaling also remains unclear and has been variously described by the mutually exclusive cross-linking and dissociation activation models. Common to these models is the significance of local plasma membrane composition, which implies that interactions between BCR transmembrane domains (TMDs) play a role in receptor functionality. Here we used an in vivo assay of TMD oligomerization called GALLEX alongside spectroscopic and computational methods to characterize the structures and interactions of human Igα and Igβ TMDs in detergent micelles and natural membranes. We observed weak self-association of the Igβ TMD and strong self-association of the Igα TMD, which scanning mutagenesis revealed was entirely stabilized by an E–X₁₀–P motif. We also demonstrated strong heterotypic interactions between the Igα and Igβ TMDs both in vitro and in vivo, which scanning mutagenesis and computational models suggest is multiconfigurational but can accommodate distinct interaction sites for self-interactions and heterotypic interactions of the Igα TMD. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the TMDs of the human BCR are sites of strong protein–protein interactions that may direct BCR assembly, endoplasmic reticulum retention, and immune signaling.     

Regulation of G-Protein Signaling by RKTG via Sequestration of the Gβγ Subunit to the Golgi Apparatus

Upon ligand binding, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) impart the signal to heterotrimeric G proteins composed of α, β, and γ subunits, leading to dissociation of the Gα subunit from the Gβγ subunit. While the Gα subunit is imperative for downstream signaling, the Gβγ subunit, in its own right, mediates a variety of cellular responses such as GPCR desensitization via recruiting GRK to the plasma membrane and AKT stimulation. Here we report a mode of spatial regulation of the Gβγ subunit through alteration in subcellular compartmentation. RKTG (Raf kinase trapping to Golgi apparatus) is a newly characterized membrane protein specifically localized at the Golgi apparatus. The N terminus of RKTG interacts with Gβ and tethers Gβγ to the Golgi apparatus. Overexpression of RKTG impedes the interaction of Gβγ with GRK2, abrogates the ligand-induced change of subcellular distribution of GRK2, reduces isoproterenol-stimulated phosphorylation of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), and alters β2AR desensitization. In addition, RKTG inhibits Gβγ- and ligand-mediated AKT phosphorylation that is enhanced in cells with downregulation of RKTG. Silencing of RKTG also alters GRK2 internalization and compromises ligand-induced Gβ translocation to the Golgi apparatus. Taken together, our results reveal that RKTG can modulate GPCR signaling through sequestering Gβγ to the Golgi apparatus and thereby attenuating the functions of Gβγ.Heterotrimeric G proteins are composed of distinct Gα, β, and γ subunits which relay extracellular signals from heptahelical G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to downstream effectors (16, 25, 30). Gα binds Gβγ when Gα is bound with GDP but dissociates from Gβγ after GDP is replaced with GTP upon activation of GPCRs by extracellular ligand (25). Under physiologic conditions, the Gβ and Gγ subunits form a dimer in which the two subunits are not separable (10, 30). Although Gα is the primary protein that transmits the signal of GPCRs to specific intracellular effectors, such as adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C, emerging evidence has indicated that Gβγ is able to regulate GPCR signaling through interacting with GPCRs, the Gα subunit, and downstream effectors (30). Predominantly, Gβγ is able to directly interact with and affect the functions of a variety of membrane and intracellular effectors, such as ion channels, adenylyl cyclase, G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) (30). The current model of Gβγ-mediated signaling restricts it mostly to the plasma membrane (PM) (30). In the case of membrane-bound effectors, such as adenylyl cyclases or GIRK channels, Gβγ regulates the activities of these transmembrane proteins through conformational alteration. In the case of cytosolic proteins such as PLCβ2 or GRK2, whose substrates are localized to PM, Gβγ regulates their activity by recruiting the proteins to PM. The activity of Gβγ is primarily regulated by GPCR and Gα, in which GPCR activation leads to conformational changes of Gα. Such change causes replacement of Gα-bound GDP with GTP and release of Gβγ from the heterotrimeric G proteins. The activity of Gβγ could also be regulated by interacting with cytosolic proteins such as RACK1 (7). However, how Gβγ-mediated signaling is regulated in a spatial manner via subcellular compartmentation is largely unknown.GRK2 is a member of a family of GRKs that can phosphorylate the agonist-occupied GPCRs (4). Specific phosphorylation of activated receptors is associated with a decreased responsiveness of GPCR to prolonged stimulation by the agonist, also known as desensitization (15, 26). Gβγ regulates the activities of GRK2 and GRK3 toward several GPCRs (9). In cooperation with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, Gβγ binds to the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of GRK2 and recruits GRK2 to PM, in which it phosphorylates activated GPCRs (18, 30). The crystallographic structure of GRK2 in complex with Gβ1γ2 has been solved (20, 32). On the other hand, AKT is an intracellular target of PI3K and plays a critical role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. It has been reported that Gβγ could activate AKT in a PI3K-dependent fashion (5), and Gβγ could mediate AKT activation at endosomes (13). Recent data also indicate that the p110β subunit of PI3K signals downstream of GPCR, and the AKT activation mediated by p110β is G protein dependent (14, 17).PAQR3 is a member of the progestin and adipoQ receptor (PAQR) family, and the members of this family are predicted to have seven transmembrane domains similar to GPCRs (31). Recently, we demonstrated that PAQR3 is localized at the Golgi apparatus and is involved in the spatial regulation of Raf kinase, whereby this protein was named Raf kinase trapping to Golgi apparatus (RKTG) (12). Biochemical analysis of RKTG suggested that its N terminus is localized on the cytoplasmic side of the Golgi membrane (21). Using the N terminus of RKTG to screen a Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid library, we determined that RKTG is able to interact with Gβ, and detailed analyses indicate that RKTG is a spatial regulator of Gβγ signaling.     

Identification of Gαi3 as a promising target for osteosarcoma treatment

Sustained activation of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) simultaneously is vital for tumorigenesis and progression of osteosarcoma (OS). Gαi proteins recruitment to various RTKs mediates downstream oncogenic signaling activation. The expression, functions and underlying mechanisms of Gαi3 in human OS were examined. Expression of Gαi3 is robustly elevated in human OS tissues and is correlated with a poor overall survival. In patient-derived primary OS cells and immortalized lines (MG63 and U2OS), Gαi3 depletion, by shRNA and CRISPR/Cas9 strategies, robustly suppressed cell viability, proliferation and migration, while provoking G1-S arrest and apoptosis activation. Conversely, Gαi3 overexpressing ectopically can accelerate proliferation and migration of OS cells. In OS cells, Gαi3 immunoprecipitated with VEGFR2, FGFR, PGDFR and EGFR, mediating downstream cascade transduction. Akt-mTOR activation in primary OS cells was potently inhibited by Gαi3 shRNA, knockout or dominant negative mutation, but augmented after Gαi3 overexpression. In vivo studies showed that Gαi3 shRNA AAV (adeno-associated viruses) intratumoral injection largely inhibited the growth of subcutaneous xenografts of primary OS cells. Moreover, the growth of the Gαi3-knockout primary OS xenografts was much slower than that of OS xenografts with empty vector. In Gαi3-depleted OS xenografts tissues, Gαi3 downregulation and Akt-mTOR inactivation were detected. Taken together, overexpressed Gαi3 mediates RTK-Akt signaling to drive OS progression.     

Regulatory subunit NEMO promotes polyubiquitin-dependent induction of NF-κB through a targetable second interaction with upstream activator IKK2

Canonical NF-κB signaling through the inhibitor of κB kinase (IKK) complex requires induction of IKK2/IKKβ subunit catalytic activity via specific phosphorylation within its activation loop. This process is known to be dependent upon the accessory ubiquitin (Ub)-binding subunit NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO)/IKKγ as well as poly-Ub chains. However, the mechanism through which poly-Ub binding serves to promote IKK catalytic activity is unclear. Here, we show that binding of NEMO/IKKγ to linear poly-Ub promotes a second interaction between NEMO/IKKγ and IKK2/IKKβ, distinct from the well-characterized interaction of the NEMO/IKKγ N terminus to the “NEMO-binding domain” at the C terminus of IKK2/IKKβ. We mapped the location of this second interaction to a stretch of roughly six amino acids immediately N-terminal to the zinc finger domain in human NEMO/IKKγ. We also showed that amino acid residues within this region of NEMO/IKKγ are necessary for binding to IKK2/IKKβ through this secondary interaction in vitro and for full activation of IKK2/IKKβ in cultured cells. Furthermore, we identified a docking site for this segment of NEMO/IKKγ on IKK2/IKKβ within its scaffold-dimerization domain proximal to the kinase domain–Ub-like domain. Finally, we showed that a peptide derived from this region of NEMO/IKKγ is capable of interfering specifically with canonical NF-κB signaling in transfected cells. These in vitro biochemical and cell culture–based experiments suggest that, as a consequence of its association with linear poly-Ub, NEMO/IKKγ plays a direct role in priming IKK2/IKKβ for phosphorylation and that this process can be inhibited to specifically disrupt canonical NF-κB signaling.