The transmembrane domain is sufficient for Sbh1p function, its association with the Sec61 complex, and interaction with Rtn1p

The Sec61 protein translocation complex in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane is composed of three subunits. The alpha-subunit, called Sec61p in yeast, is a multispanning membrane protein that forms the protein conducting channel. The functions of the smaller, carboxyl-terminally tail-anchored beta subunit Sbh1p, its close homologue Sbh2p, and the gamma subunit Sss1p are not well understood. Here we show that co-translational protein translocation into the ER is reduced in sbh1Delta sbh2Delta cells, whereas there is a limited reduction of post-translational translocation and no effect on export of a mutant form of alpha-factor precursor for ER-associated degradation in the cytosol. The translocation defect and the temperature-sensitive growth phenotype of sbh1Delta sbh2Delta cells were rescued by expression of the transmembrane domain of Sbh1p alone, and the Sbh1p transmembrane domain was sufficient for coimmunoprecipitation with Sec61p and Sss1p. Furthermore, we show that Sbh1p co-precipitates with the ER transmembrane protein Rtn1p. Sbh1p-Rtn1p complexes do not appear to contain Sss1p and Sec61p. Our results define the transmembrane domain as the minimal functional domain of the Sec61beta homologue Sbh1p in ER translocation, identify a novel interaction partner for Shb1p, and imply that Sbh1p has additional functions that are not directly linked to protein translocation in association with the Sec61 complex.     

Functional characterization of the trans-membrane domain interactions of the Sec61 protein translocation complex beta-subunit

Background  

In eukaryotic cells co- and post-translational protein translocation is mediated by the trimeric Sec61 complex. Currently, the role of the Sec61 complex β-subunit in protein translocation is poorly understood. We have shown previously that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae the trans-membrane domain alone is sufficient for the function of the β-subunit Sbh1p in co-translational protein translocation. In addition, Sbh1p co-purifies not only with the protein translocation channel subunits Sec61p and Sss1p, but also with the reticulon family protein Rtn1p.     

Peroxisome Formation Requires the Endoplasmic Reticulum Channel Protein Sec61

In peroxisome formation, models of near‐autonomous peroxisome biogenesis with membrane protein integration directly from the cytosol into the peroxisomal membrane are in direct conflict with models whereby peroxisomes bud from the endoplasmic reticulum and receive their membrane proteins through a branch of the secretory pathway. We therefore reinvestigated the role of the Sec 61 complex, the protein‐conducting channel of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in peroxisome formation. We found that depletion or partial inactivation of Sec 61 in yeast disables peroxisome formation. The ER entry of the early peroxisomal membrane protein Pex 3 engineered with a glycosylation tag is reduced in sec61 mutant cells. Moreover, we were able to reconstitute Pex 3 import into ER membranes in vitro, and we identified a variant of a signal anchor sequence for ER translocation at the Pex 3 N‐terminus. Our findings are consistent with a Sec 61 requirement for peroxisome formation and a fundamental role of the ER in peroxisome biogenesis.     

Sec61p is part of the endoplasmic reticulum‐associated degradation machinery

Endoplasmic reticulum‐associated degradation (ERAD) is a cellular pathway for the disposal of misfolded secretory proteins. This process comprises recognition of the misfolded proteins followed by their retro‐translocation across the ER membrane into the cytosol in which polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation occur. A variety of data imply that the protein import channel Sec61p has a function in the ERAD process. Until now, no physical interactions between Sec61p and other essential components of the ERAD pathway could be found. Here, we establish this link by showing that Hrd3p, which is part of the Hrd‐Der ubiquitin ligase complex, and other core components of the ERAD machinery physically interact with Sec61p. In addition, we study binding of misfolded CPY^* proteins to Sec61p during the process of degradation. We show that interaction with Sec61p is maintained until the misfolded proteins are ubiquitinated on the cytosolic side of the ER. Our observations suggest that Sec61p contacts an ERAD ligase complex for further elimination of ER lumenal misfolded proteins.     

Proteasome 19S RP Binding to the Sec61 Channel Plays a Key Role in ERAD

Import of secretory proteins into the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) is an established function of the Sec61 channel. The contribution of the Sec61 channel to export of misfolded proteins from the ER for degradation by proteasomes is still controversial, but the proteasome 19S regulatory particle (RP) is necessary and sufficient for extraction of specific misfolded proteins from the ER, and binds directly to the Sec61 channel. In this work we have identified an import-competent sec61 mutant, S353C, carrying a point mutation in ER-lumenal loop 7 which reduces affinity of the cytoplasmic face of the Sec61 channel for the 19S RP. This indicates that the interaction between the 19S RP and the Sec61 channel is dependent on conformational changes in Sec61p hinging on loop 7. The sec61-S353C mutant had no measurable ER import defects and did not cause ER stress in intact cells, but reduced ER-export of a 19S RP-dependent misfolded protein when proteasomes were limiting in a cell-free assay. Our data suggest that the interaction between the 19S RP and the Sec61 channel is essential for the export of specific substrates from the ER to the cytosol for proteasomal degradation.     

Sec61p and BiP directly facilitate polypeptide translocation into the ER.

Secretory proteins are segregated from cytosolic proteins by their translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). A modified secretory protein trapped during translocation across the ER membrane can be crosslinked to two previously identified proteins, Sec61p and BiP (Kar2p). The dependence of this cross-linking upon proteins and small molecules was examined. Mutations in SEC62 and SEC63 decrease the ability of Sec61p to be cross-linked to the secretory polypeptide trapped in translocation. ATP is also required for interaction of Sec61p with the secretory protein. Three kar2 alleles display defective translocation in vitro. Two of these alleles also decrease the ability of Sec61p to be cross-linked to the secretory protein. The third allele, while exhibiting a severe translocation defect, does not affect the interaction of Sec61p with the secretory protein. These results suggest that Sec61p is directly involved in translocation and that BiP acts at two stages of the translocation cycle.     

An interaction between the SRP receptor and the translocon is critical during cotranslational protein translocation

The signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting pathway facilitates rapid, efficient delivery of the ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC) to the protein translocation channel. We test whether the SRP receptor (SR) locates a vacant protein translocation channel by interacting with the yeast Sec61 and Ssh1 translocons. Surprisingly, the slow growth and cotranslational translocation defects caused by deletion of the transmembrane (TM) span of yeast SRbeta (SRbeta-DeltaTM) are exaggerated when the SSH1 gene is disrupted. Disruption of the SBH2 gene, which encodes the beta subunit of the Ssh1p complex, likewise causes a growth defect when combined with SRbeta-DeltaTM. Cotranslational translocation defects in the ssh1DeltaSRbeta-DeltaTM mutant are explained by slow and inefficient in vivo gating of translocons by RNCs. A critical function for translocation channel beta subunits in the SR-channel interaction is supported by the observation that simultaneous deletion of Sbh1p and Sbh2p causes a defect in the cotranslational targeting pathway that is similar to the translocation defect caused by deletion of either subunit of the SR.     

Degradation of subunits of the Sec61p complex, an integral component of the ER membrane, by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.

We have investigated the degradation of subunits of the trimeric Sec61p complex, a key component of the protein translocation apparatus of the ER membrane. A mutant form of Sec6lp and one of the two associated proteins (Sss1p) are selectively degraded, while the third constituent of the complex (Sbh1p) is stable. Our results demonstrate that the proteolysis of the multispanning membrane protein Sec61p is mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, since it requires polyubiquitination, the presence of a membrane-bound (Ubc6) and a soluble (Ubc7) ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and a functional proteasome. The process is proposed to be specific for unassembled Sec61p and Sss1p. Thus, our results suggest that one pathway of ER degradation of abnormal or unassembled membrane proteins is initiated at the cytoplasmic side of the ER.     

Mammalian Sec61 is associated with Sec62 and Sec63

In yeast, efficient protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane may occur co-translationally or post-translationally. The latter process is mediated by a membrane protein complex that consists of the Sec61p complex and the Sec62p-Sec63p subcomplex. In contrast, in mammalian cells protein translocation is almost exclusively co-translational. This transport depends on the Sec61 complex, which is homologous to the yeast Sec61p complex and has been identified in mammals as a ribosome-bound pore-forming membrane protein complex. We report here the existence of ribosome-free mammalian Sec61 complexes that associate with two ubiquitous proteins of the ER membrane. According to primary sequence analysis both proteins display homology to the yeast proteins Sec62p and Sec63p and are therefore named Sec62 and Sec63, respectively. The probable function of the mammalian Sec61-Sec62-Sec63 complex is discussed with respect to its abundance in ER membranes, which, in contrast to yeast ER membranes, apparently lack efficient post-translational translocation activity.     

Calmodulin regulation of the calcium-leak channel Sec61 is unique to vertebrates

In eukaryotes, protein transport into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is facilitated by a protein-conducting channel, the Sec61 complex. The presence of large, water-filled pores with uncontrolled ion permeability, such as those formed by Sec61 complexes in the ER membrane, would interfere with the regulated release of calcium from the ER lumen into the cytosol, an essential mechanism of intracellular signaling. We identified a calmodulin (CaM) binding motif in the cytosolic N-terminus of Sec61α from Canis familiaris that binds CaM, but not Ca²⁺-free apo-CaM, with nanomolar affinity and sequence specificity. In single channel lipid bilayer measurements, CaM potently mediated Sec61-channel closure in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner. No functional CaM binding motif was identified in the corresponding region of Sec61p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and no channel closure occurred in the presence of CaM and Ca²⁺. Therefore, CaM binding to the cytosolic N-terminus of Sec61α is involved in limiting Ca²⁺-leakage from the ER in C. familiaris but not S. cerevisiae.     

The Brl domain in Sec63p is required for assembly of functional endoplasmic reticulum translocons

Protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum occurs at pore-forming structures known as translocons. In yeast, two different targeting pathways converge at a translocation pore formed by the Sec61 complex. The signal recognition particle-dependent pathway targets nascent precursors co-translationally, whereas the Sec62p-dependent pathway targets polypeptides post-translationally. In addition to the Sec61 complex, both pathways also require Sec63p, an integral membrane protein of the Hsp40 family, and Kar2p, a soluble Hsp70 located in the ER lumen. Using a series of mutant alleles, we demonstrate that a conserved Brl (Brr2-like) domain in the COOH-terminal cytosolic region of Sec63p is essential for function both in vivo and in vitro. We further demonstrate that this domain is required for assembly of two oligomeric complexes of 350 and 380 kDa, respectively. The larger of these corresponds to the heptameric "SEC complex" required for post-translational translocation. However, the 350-kDa complex represents a newly defined hexameric SEC' complex comprising Sec61p, Sss1p, Sbh1p, Sec63p, Sec71p, and Sec72p. Our data indicate that the SEC' complex is required for co-translational protein translocation across the yeast ER membrane.     

Cancer associated mutations in Sec61γ alter the permeability of the ER translocase

Translocation of secretory and integral membrane proteins across or into the ER membrane occurs via the Sec61 complex, a heterotrimeric protein complex possessing two essential sub-units, Sec61p/Sec61α and Sss1p/Sec61γ and the non-essential Sbh1p/Sec61β subunit. In addition to forming a protein conducting channel, the Sec61 complex maintains the ER permeability barrier, preventing flow of molecules and ions. Loss of Sec61 integrity is detrimental and implicated in the progression of disease. The Sss1p/Sec61γ C-terminus is juxtaposed to the key gating module of Sec61p/Sec61α and is important for gating the translocon. Inspection of the cancer genome database identifies six mutations in highly conserved amino acids of Sec61γ/Sss1p. We identify that five out of the six mutations identified affect gating of the ER translocon, albeit with varying strength. Together, we find that mutations in Sec61γ that arise in malignant cells result in altered translocon gating dynamics, this offers the potential for the translocon to represent a target in co-therapy for cancer treatment.     

Calmodulin regulation of the calcium-leak channel Sec61 is unique to vertebrates

In eukaryotes, protein transport into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is facilitated by a protein-conducting channel, the Sec61 complex. The presence of large, water-filled pores with uncontrolled ion permeability, such as those formed by Sec61 complexes in the ER membrane, would interfere with the regulated release of calcium from the ER lumen into the cytosol, an essential mechanism of intracellular signaling. We identified a calmodulin (CaM) binding motif in the cytosolic N-terminus of Sec61α from Canis familiaris that binds CaM, but not Ca(2+)-free apo-CaM, with nanomolar affinity and sequence specificity. In single channel lipid bilayer measurements, CaM potently mediated Sec61-channel closure in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. No functional CaM binding motif was identified in the corresponding region of Sec61p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and no channel closure occurred in the presence of CaM and Ca(2+). Therefore, CaM binding to the cytosolic N-terminus of Sec61α is involved in limiting Ca(2+)-leakage from the ER in C. familiaris but not S. cerevisiae.     

Role of the cytoplasmic segments of Sec61alpha in the ribosome-binding and translocation-promoting activities of the Sec61 complex

The Sec61 complex performs a dual function in protein translocation across the RER, serving as both the high affinity ribosome receptor and the translocation channel. To define regions of the Sec61 complex that are involved in ribosome binding and translocation promotion, ribosome-stripped microsomes were subjected to limited digestions using proteases with different cleavage specificities. Protein immunoblot analysis using antibodies specific for the NH(2) and COOH terminus of Sec61alpha was used to map the location of proteolysis cleavage sites. We observed a striking correlation between the loss of binding activity for nontranslating ribosomes and the digestion of the COOH- terminal tail or cytoplasmic loop 8 of Sec61alpha. The proteolyzed microsomes were assayed for SRP-independent translocation activity to determine whether high affinity binding of the ribosome to the Sec61 complex is a prerequisite for nascent chain transport. Microsomes that do not bind nontranslating ribosomes at physiological ionic strength remain active in SRP-independent translocation, indicating that the ribosome binding and translocation promotion activities of the Sec61 complex do not strictly correlate. Translocation-promoting activity was most severely inhibited by cleavage of cytosolic loop 6, indicating that this segment is a critical determinant for this function of the Sec61 complex.     

Sec61p mediates export of a misfolded secretory protein from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol for degradation.

Degradation of misfolded secretory proteins has long been assumed to occur in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Recent evidence, however, suggests that such proteins are instead degraded by proteasomes in the cytosol, although it remains unclear how the proteins are transported out of the ER. Here we provide the first genetic evidence that Sec61p, the pore-forming subunit of the protein translocation channel in the ER membrane, is directly involved in the export of misfolded secretory proteins. We describe two novel mutants in yeast Sec61p that are cold-sensitive for import into the ER in both intact yeast cells and a cell-free system. Microsomes derived from these mutants are defective in exporting misfolded secretory proteins. These proteins become trapped in the ER and are associated with Sec61p. We conclude that misfolded secretory proteins are exported for degradation from the ER to the cytosol via channels formed by Sec61p.     

The engagement of Sec61p in the ER dislocation process

Sec61p comprises the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) channel through which nascent polypeptides are imported and from which malfolded proteins have been suggested to be exported, or dislocated, back to the cytoplasm. We have devised a genetic screen for dislocation-specific mutant alleles of SEC61 from S. cerevisiae by employing the unfolded protein response to report on the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER. Three of the isolated sec61 alleles are fully proficient in protein translocation into the ER, but defective in the elimination of a misfolded ER luminal substrate and a short-lived ER membrane-spanning model protein, which are otherwise rapidly degraded by cytoplasmic proteolysis in wild-type cells. Our results point to the fourth luminal loop and third transmembrane domain of Sec61p that markedly influence dislocation. We suggest that distinct features of the Sec61-translocon direct the two-way translocation processes.     

Cholera toxin is exported from microsomes by the Sec61p complex

After endocytosis cholera toxin is transported to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), from where its A1 subunit (CTA1) is assumed to be transferred to the cytosol by an as-yet unknown mechanism. Here, export of CTA1 from the ER to the cytosol was investigated in a cell-free assay using either microsomes loaded with CTA1 by in vitro translation or reconstituted microsomes containing CTA1 purified from V. cholerae. Export of CTA1 from the microsomes was time- and adenosine triphosphate-dependent and required lumenal ER proteins. By coimmunoprecipitation CTA1 was shown to be associated during export with the Sec61p complex, which mediates import of proteins into the ER. Export of CTA1 was inhibited when the Sec61p complexes were blocked by nascent polypeptides arrested during import, demonstrating that the export of CTA1 depended on translocation-competent Sec61p complexes. Export of CTA1 from the reconstituted microsomes indicated the de novo insertion of the toxin into the Sec61p complex from the lumenal side. Our results suggest that Sec61p complex-mediated protein export from the ER is not restricted to ER-associated protein degradation but is also used by bacterial toxins, enabling their entry into the cytosol of the target cell.     

Coordination of N-glycosylation and protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by Sss1 protein

Secretory proteins are translocated across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane through a channel formed by three proteins, namely Sec61p, Sbh1p, and Sss1p (Johnson, A. E., and van Waes, M. A. (1999) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 799-842). Sec61p and Sss1p are essential for translocation (Esnault, Y., Blondel, M. O., Deshaies, R. J., Schekman, R., and Kepes, F. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4083-4093). Sec61p is a polytopic membrane protein that lines the protein translocation channel. The role of Sss1p is unknown. During import into the ER through the Sec61p channel, many proteins are N-glycosylated before translocation is completed. In addition, both the Sec61 channel and oligosaccharyl transferase (OST) copurify with ribosomes from rough ER, suggesting that OST is located in close proximity to the Sec61 channel (Gorlich, D., Prehn, S., Hartmann, E., Kalies, K.-U., and Rapoport, T. A. (1992) Cell 71, 489-503 and Wang, L., and Dobberstein, B. (1999) FEBS Lett. 457, 316-322). Here, we demonstrate a direct interaction between Sss1p and a subunit of OST, Wbp1p, using the split-ubiquitin system and co-immunoprecipitation. We generated mutants in the cytoplasmic domain of Sss1p that disturb the interaction with OST and are viable but display a translocation defect specific for proteins with glycosylation acceptor sites. Our data suggest that Sss1p coordinates translocation across the ER membrane and N-linked glycosylation of secretory proteins.     

Effect of Sec62 on the conformation of the Sec61 channel in yeast

Most eukaryotic secretory and membrane proteins are funneled by the Sec61 complex into the secretory pathway. Furthermore, some substrate peptides rely on two essential accessory proteins, Sec62 and Sec63, being present to assist with their translocation via the Sec61 channel in post-translational translocation. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) recently succeeded in determining atomistic structures of unbound and signal sequence-engaged Sec complexes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, involving the Sec61 channel and the proteins Sec62, Sec63, Sec71 and Sec72. In this study, we investigated the conformational effects of Sec62 on Sec61. Indeed, we observed in molecular dynamics simulations that the conformational dynamics of lateral gate, plug and pore region of Sec61 are altered by the presence/absence of Sec62. In molecular dynamics simulations that were started from the cryo-EM structures of Sec61 coordinated to Sec62 or of apo Sec61, we observed that the luminal side of the lateral gate gradually adopts a closed conformation similar to the apo state during unbound state simulations. In contrast, it adopts a wider conformation in the bound state. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the conformation of the active (substrate-bound) state of the Sec61 channel shifts toward an alternative conformation in the absence of the substrate. We suggest that the signal peptide holds/stabilizes the active state conformation of Sec61 during post-translational translocation. Thus, our study explains the effect of Sec62 on the conformation of the Sec61 channel and describes the conformational transitions of Sec61 channel.     

The mammalian and yeast translocon complexes comprise a characteristic Sec61 channel

In eukaryotes, protein translocation across and insertion into the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is facilitated by a protein-conducting channel, the Sec61 complex or translocon. In our previous electrophysiological studies, we characterized the mammalian Sec61 channel from Canis familiaris. Here we extended these initial results to the Sec61 channel from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and compared the basic electrophysiological properties of both channel preparations with respect to the gating behaviour, distribution of channel open states, ionic conductance, approximated pore dimensions, reversal potential and selectivity as well as voltage-dependent open probability. We found that the Sec61 complexes from both species displayed conformable characteristics of the highly dynamic channel in an intrinsically open state. In contrast, the bacterial Sec61-homologue, the SecYEG complex from Escherichia coli, displayed under the same experimental conditions significantly different properties residing in an intrinsically closed state. We therefore propose that considerable differences between the respective eukaryote and prokaryote protein-conducting channel units and their regulation exist.