细胞周期检控蛋白Rad17

Rad17是细胞应答DNA损伤和复制叉阻滞信号转导过程中一个关键的检控蛋白,在DNA损伤和DNA复制检控中具有非常重要的作用.现对Radl7在DNA损伤检控、DNA复制检控、端粒结构稳定以及减数分裂细胞周期检控中的重要作用进行综述,并探讨Radl7与肿瘤发生的关系.     

神经生长因子在不同周龄小鼠睾丸组织中的表达

目的研究神经生长因子在小鼠不同周龄睾丸组织中的定量和定位表达。方法分别剖取不同周龄雄性小鼠的睾丸组织,部分提取总RNA,real-time PCR相对定量分析神经生长因子mRNA的表达量;另外部分组织固定、包埋,进行SABC法免疫组化分析,以观察神经生长因子蛋白在各周睾丸组织中的定位。结果Real-timePCR定量分析表明:小鼠生后1周龄睾丸组织有神经生长因子mRNA的表达,生后3周龄表达量达峰值,5周之后随鼠龄的增加呈下降趋势,成年小鼠睾丸组织的神经生长因子mRNA表达维持在一定水平。免疫组化定位分析显示:睾丸组织的神经生长因子蛋白表达于小鼠出生后的各个时期内,1周龄睾丸组织免疫阳性反应主要位于支持细胞,精原细胞也有着色;3周龄睾丸组织的间质细胞、各级生精细胞、支持细胞、管周肌样细胞表达均呈现阳性;5周后的睾丸组织内神经生长因子呈低水平表达,主要表达于间质细胞和生精细胞内。结论神经生长因子mRNA的表达量随着小鼠睾丸的生长发育期存在着一定的规律性变化;神经生长因子蛋白的表达在小鼠睾丸生长发育的不同时期其主要表达部位不同。     

p38 MAPK在小鼠睾丸不同发育阶段的表达和定位

为探讨丝裂原活化蛋白激酶p38 MAPK在小鼠睾丸不同发育阶段的表达,应用蛋白质免疫印迹杂交技术和免疫组织化学SABC法检测1至7周龄小鼠睾丸p38 MAPK的表达、定位及发育变化,并通过图像分析技术对免疫组织化学结果进行统计学分析。免疫印迹杂交发现,p38 MAPK在2～7周龄小鼠睾丸中均有表达。免疫组织化学结果显示,在2周龄小鼠睾丸曲细精管上皮中即可观察到p38 MAPK免疫阳性反应,免疫反应阳性细胞为精原细胞;3、4、5周龄小鼠睾丸仅有个别曲细精管上皮可见p38 MAPK免疫阳性反应;6、7周龄小鼠睾丸中p38 MAPK表达较丰富,免疫反应阳性细胞为精原细胞和初级精母细胞,免疫阳性反应物均主要位于细胞核内。在7周龄小鼠睾丸中还可见到部分间质细胞的细胞质亦呈p38 MAPK阳性。这些结果提示,p38 MAPK可能对生精细胞的增殖分化具有调控作用。     

细胞DNA损伤检控系统在维持端粒稳定中的功能

真核生物的DNA损伤检控系统是维持细胞基因组稳定的一个重要机制,该系统能检测细胞在生命活动过程中出现的DNA损伤并引发细胞周期阻滞,对DNA损伤进行修复,以维持细胞遗传的稳定性。端粒是位于真核细胞染色体末端由重复DNA序列和蛋白质组成的复合物,具有保护染色体、介导染色体复制、引导减数分裂时的同源染色体配对和调节细胞衰老等作用。虽然端粒与DNA双链断裂都具有作为线性染色体末端的共同特点,但正常端粒并不像DNA双链断裂那样激活DNA损伤检控系统。另一方面,端粒又与DNA损伤相似,因为多种DNA损伤检控蛋白在端粒长度稳定中起重要作用。因此DNA损伤检控系统既参与了维持正常端粒的完整性,又可对端粒损伤作出应答。现就DNA损伤检控系统在维持端粒稳定中的作用及其对功能缺陷端粒的应答作一简要综述。     

通过睾丸内注射转染外源DNA在小鼠精子的表达

为研究睾丸内注射外源DNA法生产转基因小鼠(Mus musculus)的可行性,并探讨注射DNA的最佳浓度。将环形的质粒DNA pEGFP-N1与脂质体混合制备DNA-脂质体复合物,按DNA浓度不同分为0.08μg/μl、0.12μg/μl和0.24μg/μl3组,分别注射入成年SPF级昆明小鼠睾丸内,同时设空白对照;每组处理公鼠2只,注射5d后每只与3只成年母鼠同笼,20d后在荧光显微镜下检测公鼠附睾精子,并制作睾丸石蜡切片,检测绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)的表达;PCR法检测各组后代阳性率。结果显示,3组小鼠附睾荧光精子比例分别为9.09%、47.06%和27.78%。3组小鼠的睾丸石蜡切片中均可看到不同强度的GFP表达。后代经PCR检测阳性率分别为17.26%、47.61%和22.11%。本实验证实了睾丸注射法能使外源DNA整合进入精子基因组,并能在自身和后代中得到表达,本研究中外源DNA注射浓度以0.12μg/μl效果为最佳。     

哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白（mTOR）在不同发育阶段SD大鼠睾丸中的表达及作用

精子发生是男性生殖中的主要过程,精原细胞的不断分裂增殖又保证了精子发生的顺利进行。随着年龄的不断增长,男性精子的数量、质量出现下降趋势。mTOR信号转导通路在细胞增殖分化中发挥着中心调控作用,因此,mTOR信号通路可能在精子发生过程中有着重要的地位。为了探明mTOR信号通路与精子发生的关系,首先,通过SD大鼠睾丸组织切片的免疫组化,发现mTOR是在生精小管的精原细胞胞浆中表达;其次,采用FQ-PCR检测mTOR mRNA在SD大鼠睾丸中的表达。结果显示,80周龄组mTOR的转录与8周龄组相比差异显著。最后利用Western blot检测出mTOR蛋白的表达及其对下游靶蛋白P70S6K的磷酸化效率均随年龄的增长逐渐下降。同时,在用雷帕霉素处理8周龄SD大鼠中,发现精子数量减少,P70S6K磷酸化效率降低并伴随生精小管萎缩和空泡化。通过这些结果,可以看出mTOR信号转导通路可能在精子发生中发挥着重要作用。     

SRG4在出生后小鼠睾丸及隐睾中的表达特性

研究小鼠生精新基因SRG4在出生后小鼠睾丸及手术隐睾中的表达特性, 为了解SRG4在精子发生中的作用奠定基础。取出生后1, 3, 12 w小鼠睾丸进行免疫组化检测, 观察SRG4蛋白在出生后小鼠不同发育阶段睾丸中的表达; 制备单侧手术隐睾模型, 取术后0~18 d 的隐睾组织进行半定量RT-PCR检测, 观察SRG4 mRNA在隐睾病变过程中的表达变化, 并对隐睾术后18 d 睾丸进行组织原位杂交分析。免疫组化分析结果表明, SRG4蛋白在出生1 w的小鼠睾丸中几乎检测不到, 在出生3 w的小鼠睾丸中有明显表达, 在出生12 w的小鼠中大量表达, 主要分布在精母细胞和圆形精子细胞胞浆及胞膜, 呈不均匀分布。半定量RT-PCR结果发现, SRG4 mRNA在小鼠隐睾术后0~6 d表达没有明显下调, 9 d 开始表达下调, 第18 d表达最低。组织原位杂交结果表明, 术后18 d隐睾睾丸生殖细胞大量凋亡, 精曲小管中仅见到个别的SRG4阳性信号, 而对照则不受影响。上述结果说明, SRG4蛋白表达受小鼠生长发育调控; 隐睾模型中, 随着生殖细胞的大量凋亡, SRG4基因表达下调, 提示SRG4基因可作为一个精子发生特定阶段的分子标记用以研究精子发生过程。     

基于新一代测序方法的小鼠睾丸出生后发育的转录组研究

哺乳动物睾丸的发育是一个高度复杂而精密的过程.为了从转录组水平研究睾丸正常发育过程中的动态变化,本实验选取了出生后6日龄、4周龄和10周龄的3组小鼠,分别代表其幼年期、青春期以及成年期.应用超高通量的新一代测序技术(RNA-seq),获得了2.11亿条长度为35bp的序列,鉴定出18837个基因,并且发现表达量最高的基因均与精子发生相关.同时,也发现6日龄小鼠睾丸的基因表达谱明显有别于4和10周龄,表明4周龄小鼠已进入性发育期.本文分析了睾丸发育过程中大量与精子发生和体细胞发育相关的基因,找到了MAPK,Hedgehog和Wnt等信号通路在睾丸不同发育阶段中所起的重要作用.这些研究结果加深了对睾丸发育的分子调控机制的认识.本研究也表明新一代测序技术在转录组研究中具有很大优势.     

ADAM19 在小鼠睾丸发育中的时空表达

目的 阐明含有去整合素和金属蛋白酶结构域的跨膜蛋白19(ADAM19)在小鼠睾丸发育中的作用.方法 采用半定量RT-PCR和免疫组化两种实验方法,分别检测ADAM19 mRNA和蛋白质在小鼠睾丸发育中的时空表达.结果 ①最早在胚胎发育的15.5 d才能检测到ADAM19 mRNA的表达,后其表达随着胚胎发育天数的增加而逐渐升高,到围产期表达水平达到最高.出生后,ADAM19 mRNA的表达呈现显著下降的趋势,到成体睾丸中就几乎检测不到ADAM19的表达.②和其mRNA表达变化趋势一样,ADAM19蛋白也是首次在胚胎发育的15.5 d被检测到,一直持续存在到出生后一周,一周后则几乎检测不到;阳性表达信号主要定位在睾丸的曲细精管(睾索)中.结论 ADAM19 在小鼠睾丸中的表达具有显著的发育依赖性.     

谷胱甘肽-硫-转移酶M2基因在小鼠生殖器官中的表达

利用半定量RT-PCR和原位杂交的方法检测Gstm2基因在成年雄性和雌性小鼠生殖器官中的表达,并初步评价其在生殖过程中的作用。在雄性小鼠的睾丸、附睾、输精管和雌性小鼠的卵巢、输卵管、子宫、胎盘中,半定量RT-PCR的方法均检测到Gstm2的表达,在胎盘中表达水平较低,其余组织表达水平较高。利用原位杂交的方法在睾丸的间质细胞检测出较强的信号,在附睾中有微弱的信号,而输精管上皮细胞没有检测到信号;在输卵管上皮细胞和妊娠第3d的子宫上皮细胞中检出较强的信号。由于Gstm2在RNA水平在小鼠的生殖器官中广泛表达,因此我们推测Gstm2可能在小鼠精子发生、睾酮合成、精子的成熟和运输、卵子的发生和运输、胚胎着床等生殖过程中发挥作用,此结果为深入研究Gstm2在生殖生理中的功能打下基础。     

Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 checkpoint kinase in signaling double-strand breaks during the meiotic cell cycle

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can arise at unpredictable locations after DNA damage or in a programmed manner during meiosis. DNA damage checkpoint response to accidental DSBs during mitosis requires the Rad53 effector kinase, whereas the meiosis-specific Mek1 kinase, together with Red1 and Hop1, mediates the recombination checkpoint in response to programmed meiotic DSBs. Here we provide evidence that exogenous DSBs lead to Rad53 phosphorylation during the meiotic cell cycle, whereas programmed meiotic DSBs do not. However, the latter can trigger phosphorylation of a protein fusion between Rad53 and the Mec1-interacting protein Ddc2, suggesting that the inability of Rad53 to transduce the meiosis-specific DSB signals might be due to its failure to access the meiotic recombination sites. Rad53 phosphorylation/activation is elicited when unrepaired meiosis-specific DSBs escape the recombination checkpoint. This activation requires homologous chromosome segregation and delays the second meiotic division. Altogether, these data indicate that Rad53 prevents sister chromatid segregation in the presence of unrepaired programmed meiotic DSBs, thus providing a salvage mechanism ensuring genetic integrity in the gametes even in the absence of the recombination checkpoint.     

Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 protein kinase is required for the execution of checkpoint arrest at multiple stages of the cell cycle. We found that Rad53 autophosphorylation activity depends on in trans phosphorylation mediated by Mec1 and does not require physical association with other proteins. Uncoupling in trans phosphorylation from autophosphorylation using a rad53 kinase-defective mutant results in a dominant-negative checkpoint defect. Activation of Rad53 in response to DNA damage in G(1) requires the Rad9, Mec3, Ddc1, Rad17 and Rad24 checkpoint factors, while this dependence is greatly reduced in S phase cells. Furthermore, during recovery from checkpoint activation, Rad53 activity decreases through a process that does not require protein synthesis. We also found that Rad53 modulates the lagging strand replication apparatus by controlling phosphorylation of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex in response to intra-S DNA damage.     

Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p.

Checkpoints prevent DNA replication or nuclear division when chromosomes are damaged. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DDC1 gene belongs to the RAD17, MEC3 and RAD24 epistasis group which, together with RAD9, is proposed to act at the beginning of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Ddc1p is periodically phosphorylated during unperturbed cell cycle and hyperphosphorylated in response to DNA damage. We demonstrate that Ddc1p interacts physically in vivo with Mec3p, and this interaction requires Rad17p. We also show that phosphorylation of Ddc1p depends on the key checkpoint protein Mec1p and also on Rad24p, Rad17p and Mec3p. This suggests that Mec1p might act together with the Rad24 group of proteins at an early step of the DNA damage checkpoint response. On the other hand, Ddc1p phosphorylation is independent of Rad53p and Rad9p. Moreover, while Ddc1p is required for Rad53p phosphorylation, it does not play any major role in the phosphorylation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p, which requires RAD9 and MEC1. We suggest that Rad9p and Ddc1p might function in separated branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway, playing different roles in determining Mec1p activity and/or substrate specificity.     

Localization of the Drosophila Rad9 protein to the nuclear membrane is regulated by the C-terminal region and is affected in the meiotic checkpoint

Rad9, Rad1, and Hus1 (9-1-1) are part of the DNA integrity checkpoint control system. It was shown previously that the C-terminal end of the human Rad9 protein, which contains a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) nearby, is critical for the nuclear transport of Rad1 and Hus1. In this study, we show that in Drosophila, Hus1 is found in the cytoplasm, Rad1 is found throughout the entire cell and that Rad9 (DmRad9) is a nuclear protein. More specifically, DmRad9 exists in two alternatively spliced forms, DmRad9A and DmRad9B, where DmRad9B is localized at the cell nucleus, and DmRad9A is found on the nuclear membrane both in Drosophila tissues and also when expressed in mammalian cells. Whereas both alternatively spliced forms of DmRad9 contain a common NLS near the C terminus, the 32 C-terminal residues of DmRad9A, specific to this alternative splice form, are required for targeting the protein to the nuclear membrane. We further show that activation of a meiotic checkpoint by a DNA repair gene defect but not defects in the anchoring of meiotic chromosomes to the oocyte nuclear envelope upon ectopic expression of non-phosphorylatable Barrier to Autointegration Factor (BAF) dramatically affects DmRad9A localization. Thus, by studying the localization pattern of DmRad9, our study reveals that the DmRad9A C-terminal region targets the protein to the nuclear membrane, where it might play a role in response to the activation of the meiotic checkpoint.     

Role of a Complex Containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint Pathway

Genetic analysis has suggested that RAD17, RAD24, MEC3, and DDC1 play similar roles in the DNA damage checkpoint control in budding yeast. These genes are required for DNA damage-induced Rad53 phosphorylation and considered to function upstream of RAD53 in the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Here we identify Mec3 as a protein that associates with Rad17 in a two-hybrid screen and demonstrate that Rad17 and Mec3 interact physically in vivo. The amino terminus of Rad17 is required for its interaction with Mec3, and the protein encoded by the rad17-1 allele, containing a missense mutation at the amino terminus, is defective for its interaction with Mec3 in vivo. Ddc1 interacts physically and cosediments with both Rad17 and Mec3, indicating that these three proteins form a complex. On the other hand, Rad24 is not found to associate with Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1. DDC1 overexpression can partially suppress the phenotypes of the rad24Δ mutation: sensitivity to DNA damage, defect in the DNA damage checkpoint and decrease in DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of Rad53. Taken together, our results suggest that Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 form a complex which functions downstream of Rad24 in the DNA damage checkpoint pathway.     

Regulation of Rad17 Protein Turnover Unveils an Impact of Rad17-APC Cascade in Breast Carcinogenesis and Treatment

Aberrant regulation of DNA damage checkpoint function leads to genome instability that in turn can predispose cellular tissues to become cancerous. Previous works from us and others demonstrated the role of Rad17 in either activation or termination of DNA damage checkpoint function. In the current study, we have revealed the unexpected accumulation of Rad17 in various types of breast cancer cell lines as well as human breast cancer tissues. We observed that Rad17 protein turnover rate in breast epithelial cells is much faster than in breast cancer cells, where the turnover of Rad17 is regulated by the Cdh1/APC pathway. We further observed that Rad17-mediated checkpoint function is modulated by proteolysis. Stabilization of Rad17 disrupts cellular response to chemotherapeutic drug-induced DNA damage and enhances cellular transformation. In addition, manipulation of Rad17 by RNA interference or stabilization of Rad17 significantly sensitize breast cancer cell to various chemotherapeutic drugs. Our present results indicate the manipulation of Rad17 proteolysis could be a valuable approach to sensitize breast cancer cell to the chemotherapeutic treatment despite of the critical role in governing DNA damage response and cellular recovery from genotoxic stress.     

Retention but not recruitment of Crb2 at double-strand breaks requires Rad1 and Rad3 complexes

The fission yeast checkpoint protein Crb2, related to budding yeast Rad9 and human 53BP1 and BRCA1, has been suggested to act as an adapter protein facilitating the phosphorylation of specific substrates by Rad3-Rad26 kinase. To further understand its role in checkpoint signaling, we examined its localization in live cells by using fluorescence microscopy. In response to DNA damage, Crb2 localizes to distinct nuclear foci, which represent sites of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Crb2 colocalizes with Rad22 at persistent foci, suggesting that Crb2 is retained at sites of DNA damage during repair. Damage-induced Crb2 foci still form in cells defective in Rad1, Rad3, and Rad17 complexes, but these foci do not persist as long as in wild-type cells. Our results suggest that Crb2 functions at the sites of DNA damage, and its regulated persistent localization at damage sites may be involved in facilitating DNA repair and/or maintaining the checkpoint arrest while DNA repair is under way.     

Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad32 protein: a phosphoprotein with an essential phosphoesterase motif required for repair of DNA double strand breaks.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad32 protein is required for repair of DNA double strand breaks, minichromosome stability and meiotic recombination. We show here that the Rad32 protein is phosphorylated in a cell cycle-dependent manner and during meiosis. The phosphorylation is not dependent on the checkpoint protein Rad3. Analysis of a partially purified protein preparation indicates that Rad32 is likely to act in a complex. Characterisation of the rad32-1 mutation and site-directed mutagenesis indicate that three aspartate residues in the conserved phosphoesterase motifs are important for both mitotic and meiotic functions, namely response to UV and ionising radiation and spore viability.     

Rad4TopBP1, a scaffold protein, plays separate roles in DNA damage and replication checkpoints and DNA replication

Rad4TopBP1, a BRCT domain protein, is required for both DNA replication and checkpoint responses. Little is known about how the multiple roles of Rad4TopBP1 are coordinated in maintaining genome integrity. We show here that Rad4TopBP1 of fission yeast physically interacts with the checkpoint sensor proteins, the replicative DNA polymerases, and a WD-repeat protein, Crb3. We identified four novel mutants to investigate how Rad4TopBP1 could have multiple roles in maintaining genomic integrity. A novel mutation in the third BRCT domain of rad4+TopBP1 abolishes DNA damage checkpoint response, but not DNA replication, replication checkpoint, and cell cycle progression. This mutant protein is able to associate with all three replicative polymerases and checkpoint proteins Rad3ATR-Rad26ATRIP, Hus1, Rad9, and Rad17 but has a compromised association with Crb3. Furthermore, the damaged-induced Rad9 phosphorylation is significantly reduced in this rad4TopBP1 mutant. Genetic and biochemical analyses suggest that Crb3 has a role in the maintenance of DNA damage checkpoint and influences the Rad4TopBP1 damage checkpoint function. Taken together, our data suggest that Rad4TopBP1 provides a scaffold to a large complex containing checkpoint and replication proteins thereby separately enforcing checkpoint responses to DNA damage and replication perturbations during the cell cycle.