Phosphatidate degradation: Phosphatidate phosphatases (lipins) and lipid phosphate phosphatases

Three lipid phosphate phosphatases (LPPs) regulate cell signaling by modifying the concentrations of a variety of lipid phosphates versus their dephosphorylated products. In particular, the LPPs are normally considered to regulate signaling by the phospholipase D (PLD) pathway by converting phosphatidate (PA) to diacylglycerol (DAG). LPP activities do modulate the accumulations of PA and DAG following PLD activation, but this could also involve an effect upstream of PLD activation. The active sites of the LPPs are on the exterior surface of plasma membranes, or on the luminal surface of internal membranes. Consequently, the actions of the LPPs in metabolizing PA formed by PLD1 or PLD2 should depend on the access of this substrate to the active site of the LPPs. Alternatively, PA generated on the cytosolic surface of membranes should be readily accessible to the family of specific phosphatidate phosphatases, namely the lipins. Presently, there is only indirect evidence for the lipins participating in cell signaling following PLD activation. So far, we know relatively little about how individual LPPs and specific phosphatidate phosphatases (lipins) modulate cell signaling through controlling the turnover of bioactive lipids that are formed after PLD activation.     

The role of sphingosine 1‐phosphate and its receptors in cardiovascular diseases

There are many different types of cardiovascular diseases, which impose a huge economic burden due to their extremely high mortality rates, so it is necessary to explore the underlying mechanisms to achieve better supportive and curative care outcomes. Sphingosine 1‐phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lipid mediator with paracrine and autocrine activities that acts through its cell surface S1P receptors (S1PRs) and intracellular signals. In the circulatory system, S1P is indispensable for both normal and disease conditions; however, there are very different views on its diverse roles, and its specific relevance to cardiovascular pathogenesis remains elusive. Here, we review the synthesis, release and functions of S1P, specifically detail the roles of S1P and S1PRs in some common cardiovascular diseases, and then address several controversial points, finally, we focus on the development of S1P‐based therapeutic approaches in cardiovascular diseases, such as the selective S1PR1 modulator amiselimod (MT‐1303) and the non‐selective S1PR1 and S1PR3 agonist fingolimod, which may provide valuable insights into potential therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular diseases.     

Nuclear sphingolipids: metabolism and signaling

Sphingolipids are most prominently expressed in the plasma membrane, but recent studies have pointed to important signaling and regulatory roles in the nucleus. The most abundant nuclear sphingolipid is sphingomyelin (SM), which occurs in the nuclear envelope (NE) as well as intranuclear sites. The major metabolic product of SM is ceramide, which is generated by nuclear sphingomyelinase and triggers apoptosis and other metabolic changes. Ceramide is further hydrolyzed to free fatty acid and sphingosine, the latter undergoing conversion to sphingosine phosphate by action of a specific nuclear kinase. Gangliosides are another type of sphingolipid found in the nucleus, members of the a-series of gangliotetraose gangliosides (GM1, GD1a) occurring in the NE and endonuclear compartments. GM1 in the inner membrane of the NE is tightly associated with a Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger whose activity it potentiates, thereby contributing to regulation of Ca(2+) homeostasis in the nucleus. This was shown to exert a cytoprotective role as absence or inactivation of this nuclear complex rendered cells vulnerable to apoptosis. This was demonstrated in the greatly enhanced kainite-induced seizure activity in knockout mice lacking gangliotetraose gangliosides. The pathology included apoptotic destruction of neurons in the CA3 region of the hippocampus. Ca(2+) homeostasis was restored in these animals with LIGA-20, a membrane-permeant derivative of GM1 that entered the NE and activated the nuclear Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger. Some evidence suggests the presence of uncharged glycosphingolipids in the nucleus.     

Metabolic pathways and physiological and pathological significances of lysolipid phosphate mediators

Lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine 1-phosphate are structurally simple and physiologically very important lysophospholipids. Because they possess distinct structural backbones (glycerol and sphingosine, respectively), there are different metabolic pathways for their intracellular production. Recently, several key enzymes that produce or degrade these lysolipid phosphate mediators extracellularly have been characterized. This review focuses on the physiological and pathophysiological significances of the extracellular metabolic pathways involving recently characterized exo-type lysophospholipase D, ecto-type phospholipase A, and ecto-type lipid phosphate phosphatase.     

Vascular biology: the role of sphingosine 1‐phosphate in both the resting state and inflammation

The vascular and immune systems of mammals are closely intertwined: the individual components of the immune system must move between various body compartments to perform their function effectively. Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive lipid mediator, exerts effects on the two organ systems and influences the interaction between them. In the resting state, the vascular S1P gradient contributes to control of lymphocyte recirculation through the blood, lymphoid tissue and lymphatic vasculature. The high level of S1P in blood helps maintain endothelial barrier integrity. During the inflammatory process, both the level of S1P in different immune compartments and S1P receptor expression on lymphocytes and endothelial cells are modified, resulting in functionally important changes in endothelial cell and lymphocyte behaviour. These include transient arrest of lymphocytes in secondary lymphoid tissue, crucial for generation of adaptive immunity, and subsequent promotion of lymphocyte recruitment to sites of inflammation. This review begins with an outline of the basic biochemistry of S1P. S1P receptor signalling is then discussed, followed by an exploration of the roles of S1P in the vascular and immune systems, with particular focus on the interface between them. The latter part concerns crosstalk between S1P and other signalling pathways, and concludes with a look at therapies targeting the S1P-S1P receptor axis.     

Structural organization of mammalian lipid phosphate phosphatases: implications for signal transduction

This article describes the regulation of cell signaling by lipid phosphate phosphatases (LPPs) that control the conversion of bioactive lipid phosphates to their dephosphorylated counterparts. A structural model of the LPPs, that were previously called Type 2 phosphatidate phosphatases, is described. LPPs are characterized by having no Mg²⁺ requirement and their insensitivity to inhibition by N-ethylmaleimide. The LPPs have six putative transmembrane domains and three highly conserved domains that define a phosphatase superfamily. The conserved domains are juxtaposed to the proposed membrane spanning domains such that they probably form the active sites of the phosphatases. It is predicted that the active sites of the LPPs are exposed at the cell surface or on the luminal surface of intracellular organelles, such as Golgi or the endoplasmic reticulum, depending where various LPPs are expressed. LPPs could attenuate cell activation by dephosphorylating bioactive lipid phosphate esters such as phosphatidate, lysophosphatidate, sphingosine 1-phosphate and ceramide 1-phosphate. In so doing, the LPPs could generate alternative signals from diacylglycerol, sphingosine and ceramide. The LPPs might help to modulate cell signaling by the phospholipase D pathway. For example, phosphatidate generated within the cell by phospholipase D could be converted by an LPP to diacylglycerol. This should change the relative balance of signaling by these two lipids. Another possible function of the LPPs relates to the secretion of lysophosphatidate and sphingosine 1-phosphate by activated platelets and other cells. These exogenous lipids activate phospholipid growth factor receptors on the surface of cells. LPP activities could attenuate cell activation by lysophosphatidate and sphingosine 1-phosphate through their respective receptors.     

Lysophospholipids in development: Miles apart and edging in

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) are endogenous bioactive lipids that participate in the regulation of mammalian cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and angiogenesis. These processes are each critical for successful embryogenesis, raising the possibility that lysophospholipid signaling may contribute to normal animal development. In fact, recent studies in developmental model systems have established that S1P and LPA are necessary for diverse developmental programs including those required for morphogenesis of vertebrate reproductive, cardiovascular and central and peripheral nervous systems (PNS), as well as the establishment of maternal-fetal circulation and the immune system. Genetic, morphological, and biochemical characterization of developmental model systems offer powerful approaches to elucidating the molecular mechanisms of lysophospholipid signaling and its contributions to animal development and postnatal physiology. In this review, the routes of S1P and LPA metabolism and our current understanding of lysophospholipid-mediated signal transduction in mammalian cells will be summarized. The evidence implicating lysophospholipid signaling in the development of specific vertebrate systems will then be reviewed, with an emphasis on signals mediated through G protein-coupled receptors of the Edg family. Lastly, recent insights derived from the study of simple metazoan models and implications regarding lysophospholipid signaling in organisms in which Edg receptors are not conserved will be explored.     

The compartmentalization and translocation of the sphingosine kinases: Mechanisms and functions in cell signaling and sphingolipid metabolism

Members of the sphingosine kinase (SK) family of lipid signaling enzymes, comprising SK1 and SK2 in humans, are receiving considerable attention for their roles in a number of physiological and pathophysiological processes. The SKs are considered signaling enzymes based on their production of the potent lipid second messenger sphingosine-1-phosphate, which is the ligand for a family of five G-protein-linked receptors. Both SK1 and SK2 are intracellular enzymes and do not possess obvious membrane anchor domains within their primary sequences. The native substrates (sphingosine and dihydrosphingosine) are lipids, as are the corresponding products, and therefore would have a propensity to be membrane associated, suggesting that specific membrane localization of the SKs could affect both access to substrate and localized production of product. Here, we consider the emerging picture of the SKs as enzymes localized to specific intracellular sites, sometimes by agonist-dependent translocation, the mechanism targeting these enzymes to those sites, and the functional consequence of that localization. Not only is the signaling output of the SKs affected by subcellular localization, but the role of these enzymes as metabolic regulators of sphingolipid metabolism may be impacted as well.     

Enhancement by sphingosine 1‐phosphate in vasopressin‐induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis in aortic smooth‐muscle cells: Involvement of p38 MAP kinase

We previously reported that sphingosine 1‐phosphate (S‐1‐P), a sphingomyelin metabolite, activates p44/p42 mitogen‐activated protein (MAP) kinase and p38 MAP kinase in aortic smooth‐muscle A10 cells. In the present study, we investigated the effect of sphingomyelin metabolites on phospholipase C‐catalyzing phosphoinositide hydrolysis induced by arginine vasopressin (AVP) in A10 cells. C₂‐ceramide and sphingosine had little effect on inositol phosphate (IP) formation stimulated by AVP. S‐1‐P, which alone slightly stimulated the IPs formation, dose‐dependently amplified the AVP‐induced formation of IPs. Tumor necrosis factor‐α enhanced the AVP‐induced formation of IPs. However, S‐1‐P did not enhance the formation of IPs by NaF, a heterotrimeric GTP‐binding protein activator. Pertussis toxin inhibited the effect of S‐1‐P. PD98059, an inhibitor of the upstream kinase that activates p44/p42 MAP kinase, had little effect on the enhancement by S‐1‐P. SB203580, an inhibitor of p38 MAP kinase, suppressed the effect of S‐1‐P on the formation of IPs by AVP. SB203580 inhibited the AVP‐induced phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase. Pertussis toxin suppressed the phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase by S‐1‐P. These results indicate that S‐1‐P amplifies AVP‐induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis by phospholipase C through p38 MAP kinase in vascular smooth‐muscle cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 80:46–52, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Testosterone regulates the expression and functional activity of sphingosine‐1‐phosphate receptors in the rat corpus cavernosum

The bioactive lipid sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) regulates smooth muscle (SM) contractility predominantly via three G protein‐coupled receptors. The S1P1 receptor is associated with nitric oxide (NO)‐mediated SM relaxation, while S1P2 & S1P3 receptors are linked to SM contraction via activation of the Rho‐kinase pathway. This study is to determine testosterone (T) modulating the expression and functional activity of S1P receptors in corpus cavernosum (CC). Adult male Sprague‐Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups: sham‐operated controls, surgical castration and T supplemented group. Serum S1P levels were detected by high‐performance liquid chromatography. The expression of S1P1‐3 receptors and sphingosine kinases was detected by real‐time RT‐PCR. In vitro organ bath contractility and in vivo intracavernous pressure (ICP) measurement were also performed. T deprivation significantly decreased ICP rise. Meanwhile, surgical castration induced a significant increase in serum S1P level and the expression of S1P2‐3 receptors by twofold (P < 0.05) but a decrease in the expression of S1P1 receptor. Castration also augmented exogenous phenylephrine (PE), S1P, S1P1,3 receptor agonist FTY720‐P contractility and S1P2‐specific antagonist JTE013 relaxation effect. T supplemented could restore the aforementioned changes. We provide novel data that castration increased serum S1P concentration and up‐regulated the expression of S1P2‐3 receptors in CC. Consistently, agonizing S1P receptors induced CCSM contraction and antagonizing mediated relaxation were augmented. This provides the first clear evidence that S1P system dysregulation may contribute to hypogonadism‐related erectile dysfunction (ED), and S1P receptors may be expected as a potential target for treating ED.     

Hesperidin modulates dextran sulfate sodium‐induced ulcerative colitis in rats: Targeting sphingosine kinase‐1‐ sphingosine 1 phosphate signaling pathway,mitochondrial biogenesis,inflammation, and apoptosis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder interfering with life quality. A total of 60 male Wistar rats were divided into four equal groups: Control (group I), hesperidin only (group II), UC untreated (group III), and UC treated with hesperidin (group IV). Hesperidin had modulatory effects on UC pathogenesis, which might be through alleviating colonic sphingosine phosphate phosphatase 2 messenger RNA expression and sphingosine kinase‐1 levels, thus suppressing the subsequent downstream inflammatory and apoptotic cascades represented by decreased macrophage inflammatory protein‐1α and enhancement of B‐cell lymphoma 2 immunohistochemistry expression. Also, it improved mitochondrial biogenesis by increasing the peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐gamma‐coactivator 1‐α level. It successfully restored redox potential as evidenced by marked alleviations of the nitric oxide and peroxynitrite levels, increasing total antioxidant capacity, and activating the superoxide dismutase enzyme. Also, hesperidin alleviated the UC disease activity index and improved the histopathological picture. These findings may offer a new therapeutic strategy for UC treatment.     

Pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphate (PDHb) phosphatase in brain: activity, properties, and subcellular localization

The activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphate (PDHb) phosphatase in rat brain mitochondria and homogenate was determined by measuring the rate of activation of purified, phosphorylated (i.e., inactive) pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHC), which had been purified from bovine kidney and inactivated by phosphorylation with Mg . ATP. The PDHb phosphatase activity in purified mitochondria showed saturable kinetics with respect to its substrate, the phospho-PDHC. It had a pH optimum between 7.0 and 7.4, depended on Mg and Ca, and was inhibited by NaF and K-phosphate. These properties are consistent with those of the highly purified enzyme from beef heart. On subcellular fractionation, PDHb phosphatase copurified with mitochondrial marker enzymes (fumarase and PDHC) and separated from a cytosolic marker enzyme (lactate dehydrogenase) and a membrane marker enzyme (acetylcholinesterase), suggesting that it, like its substrate, is located in mitochondria. PDHb phosphatase had similar kinetic properties in purified mitochondria and in homogenate: dependence on Mg and Ca, independence of dichloroacetate, and inhibition by NaF and K-phosphate. These results are consistent with there being only one type of PDHb phosphatase in rat brain preparations. They support the validity of the measurements of the activity of this enzyme in brain homogenates.     

The actions of in ovo cortisol on egg fertility,embryo development and the expression of growth‐related genes in rainbow trout embryos,and the growth performance of juveniles

Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) oocytes were incubated for 3 hr in ovarian fluid alone (CC), or cortisol‐enriched ovarian fluid [100 or 1,000 ng ml^?1 (CL and CH, respectively)], after which they were fertilized; the growth and development of the embryos reared from these oocytes was monitored until first feed, and the juveniles were monitored for 9 months. The hatching rates of the CH group were significantly reduced, but the overall survival as measured at 40‐week post‐fertilization was similar in the three treatment groups. In addition, significant apparently biphasic changes relative to the CC group were found in the expression of some key growth‐related genes in the CL and CH treatment groups, particularly IGF‐1, IGF‐2, GH1, GH2, GH receptors, and thyroid hormone receptors (TRα and TRβ). Moreover, the juveniles of the CL (but not the CH treatment group) exhibited enhanced growth; the enhanced growth could not be explained on the basis of increased feed conversion efficiency or changes in serum GH levels at the juvenile stage. Additionally, relative growth rates from the three treatment groups were similar, suggesting that the biphasic growth‐enhancing effects of cortisol occurred very early in embryogenesis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77:922–931, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Comparative genetic analysis of Arabidopsis purple acid phosphatases AtPAP10, AtPAP12, and AtPAP26 provides new insights into their roles in plant adaptation to phosphate deprivation

Induction and secretion of acid phosphatases(APases) is thought to be an adaptive mechanism that helps plants survive and grow under phosphate(Pi) deprivation. In Arabidopsis, there are 29 purple acid phosphatase(AtPAP)genes. To systematically investigate the roles of different AtPAPs, we first identified knockout or knock‐down T‐DNA lines for all 29 AtPAP genes. Using these atpap mutants combined with in‐gel and quantitative APase enzyme assays,we demonstrated that AtPAP12 and AtPAP26 are two major intracellular and secreted APases in Arabidopsis while AtPAP10is mainly a secreted APase. On Pi‐deficient(P) medium or Pmedium supplemented with the organophosphates ADP and fructose‐6‐phosphate(Fru‐6‐P), growth of atpap10 was significantly reduced whereas growth of atpap12 was only moderately reduced, and growth of atpap26 was nearly equal to that of the wild type(WT). Overexpression of the AtPAP12 or AtPAP26 gene, however, caused plants to grow better on Por P medium supplemented with ADP or Fru‐6‐P. Interestingly, Pi levels are essentially the same for the WT and overexpressing lines, although these two types of plants have significantly different growth phenotypes. These results suggest that the APases may have other roles besides enhancing internal Pi recycling or releasing Pi from external organophosphates for plant uptake.     

Small,dense HDL 3 particles attenuate apoptosis in endothelial cells: pivotal role of apolipoprotein A‐I

Plasma high‐density lipoproteins (HDLs) protect endothelial cells against apoptosis induced by oxidized low‐density lipoprotein (oxLDL). The specific component(s) of HDLs implicated in such cytoprotection remain(s) to be identified. Human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC‐1) were incubated with mildly oxLDL in the presence or absence of each of five physicochemically distinct HDL subpopulations fractionated from normolipidemic human plasma (n= 7) by isopycnic density gradient ultracentrifugation. All HDL subfractions protected HMEC‐1 against oxLDL‐induced primary apoptosis as revealed by nucleic acid staining, annexin V binding, quantitative DNA fragmentation, inhibition of caspase‐3 activity and reduction of cytoplasmic release of cytochrome c and apoptosis‐inducing factor. Small, dense HDL 3c displayed twofold superior intrinsic cytoprotective activity (as determined by mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity) relative to large, light HDL 2b on a per particle basis (P < 0.05). Equally, all HDL subfractions attenuated intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS); such anti‐oxidative activity diminished from HDL 3c to HDL 2b. The HDL protein moiety, in which apolipoprotein A‐I (apoA‐I) predominated, accounted for ～70% of HDL anti‐apoptotic activity. Furthermore, HDL reconstituted with apoA‐I, cholesterol and phospholipid potently protected HMEC‐1 from apoptosis. By contrast, modification of the content of sphingosine‐1‐phosphate in HDL did not significantly alter cytoprotection. We conclude that small, dense, lipid‐poor HDL 3 potently protects endothelial cells from primary apoptosis and intracellular ROS generation induced by mildly oxLDL, and that apoA‐I is pivotal to such protection.     

Novel clusters of receptors for sphingosine-1-phosphate, sphingosylphosphorylcholine, and (lyso)-phosphatidic acid: new receptors for "old" ligands

The (lyso)phospholipid mediators sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC), and phosphatidic acid (PA) regulate diverse cellular responses such as proliferation, survival and death, cytoskeletal rearrangements, cell motility, and differentiation among many others. Signaling is complex and many signaling events are mediated through the activation of cell surface seven transmembrane (7TM) G protein coupled receptors. Five high affinity receptors for S1P have been identified so far and named S1P(1, 2,3,4,5) (formerly referred to as endothelial differentiation gene (edg)1, 5, 3, 6, 8). Recently, the orphan receptor GPR63 was identified a low affinity S1P receptor structurally distant from the S1P(1-5) family. The orphan GPR3, 6, 12 cluster, phylogenetically related to the edg and melanocortin receptors appears to be subject to modulation by S1P and SPC although all three receptors are strong constitutive stimulators of the Galphas-adenylyl cyclase (AC) pathway and would not require additional ligand stimulation but rather inverse agonism to control activity. Ovarian cancer G protein coupled receptor 1 (OGR1) and GPR4, two structurally closely related receptors were assigned in functional and binding studies as high affinity molecular targets for SPC. Very recently, however, both OGR1 and GPR4 were described as receptors endowed with the ability to signal cells in response to protons. LPA exerts its biological effects through the activation of G protein coupled LPA(1-3) receptors (formerly referred to as edg2, 4, 7). A fourth high affinity LPA receptor has been identified: P2Y9 (GPR23) structurally related to nucleotide receptors and phylogenetically quite distant from the high affinity LPA(1-3) cluster. This review attempts to give an overview about the existing families of lysophosholipid receptors and the spectrum of lipid agonists they use as high or low affinity ligands to relay extracellular signals into intracellular responses. Recently deorphaned lipid receptors, within and outside the known lipid receptor clusters will receive particular attention.