Binding of misacylated tRNAs to the ribosomal A site

To test whether the ribosome displays specificity for the esterified amino acid and the tRNA body of an aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA), the stabilities of 4 correctly acylated and 12 misacylated tRNAs in the ribosomal A site were determined. By introducing the GAC (valine) anticodon into each tRNA, a constant anticodon.codon interaction was maintained, thus removing concern that different anticodon.codon strengths might affect the binding of the different aa-tRNAs to the A site. Surprisingly, all 16 aa-tRNAs displayed similar dissociation rate constants from the A site. These results suggest that either the ribosome is not specific for different amino acids and tRNA bodies when intact aa-tRNAs are used or the specificity for the amino acid side chain and tRNA body is masked by a conformational change upon aa-tRNA release.     

The affinity of elongation factor Tu for an aminoacyl-tRNA is modulated by the esterified amino acid

When different mutations were introduced into the anticodon loop and at position 73 of YFA2, a derivative of yeast tRNA(Phe), a single tRNA body was misacylated with 13 different amino acids. The affinities of these misacylated tRNAs for Thermus thermophilus elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu).GTP were determined using a ribonuclease protection assay. A range of 2.5 kcal/mol in the binding energies was observed, clearly demonstrating that EF-Tu specifically recognizes the side chain of the esterified amino acid. Furthermore, this specificity can be altered by introducing a mutation in the amino acid binding pocket on the surface of EF-Tu. Also, when discussed in conjunction with the previously determined specificity of EF-Tu for the tRNA body, these experiments further demonstrate that EF-Tu uses thermodynamic compensation to bind cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs similarly.     

Contribution of the esterified amino acid to the binding of aminoacylated tRNAs to the ribosomal P- and A-sites

Crystallographic studies suggest that the esterified amino acid of aminoacyl tRNA make contacts with the ribosomal A-site but not in the P-site. Biochemical evidence indicating a thermodynamic contribution of the esterified amino acid to binding aminoacyl-tRNA to either the ribosomal P- and A-sites has been inconsistent, partly because of the labile nature of the aminoacyl linkage and the long times required to reach equilibrium. Measuring the association and dissociation rates of deacylated and aminoacylated tRNAs to the A-site and P-site of E. coli ribosomes afforded an accurate estimate of the contribution of the amino acid. While esterified phenylalanine or methionine has no effect on the affinity of tRNA to the P-site, an esterified pheylalanine stabilizes binding to the A-site by 7 kJ/mol, in agreement with the contacts observed in the X-ray crystal structure. In addition, it was shown that the presence of an esterified amino acid in one ribosomal site does not affect the binding of an aa-tRNA to the other site.     

Predicting the binding affinities of misacylated tRNAs for Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu.GTP

The free energies for the binding of 20 different unmodified Escherichia coli elongator aminoacyl-tRNAs to Thermus thermophilus elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) were determined. When combined with the binding free energies for the same tRNA bodies misacylated with either valine or phenylalanine determined previously [Asahara, H., and Uhlenbeck, O. C. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 3499-3504], these data permit the calculation of the contribution of each esterified amino acid to the total free energy of binding of the complex. The two data sets can also be used to calculate the free energy of binding of EF-Tu to any misacylated E. coli tRNA, and the values agree well with previously published experimental values. In addition, a survey of active misacylated suppressor tRNAs suggests that a minimal threshold of binding free energy for EF-Tu is required for suppression to occur.     

Amino acid modifications on tRNA

The accurate formation of cognate aminoacyl-transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) is essential for the fidelity of translation. Most amino acids are esterified onto their cognate tRNA isoacceptors directly by aa-tRNA synthetases. However, in the case of four amino acids (Gln, Asn, Cys and Sec), aminoacyl-tRNAs are made through indirect pathways in many organisms across all three domains of life. The process begins with the charging of noncognate amino acids to tRNAs by a specialized synthetase in the case of Cys-tRNA(Cys) formation or by synthetases with relaxed specificity, such as the non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA, non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA and seryl-tRNA synthetases. The resulting misacylated tRNAs are then converted to cognate pairs through transformation of the amino acids on the tRNA, which is catalyzed by a group of tRNA-dependent modifying enzymes, such as tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, Sep-tRNA:Cys-tRNA synthase, O-phosphoseryl-tRNA kinase and Sep-tRNA:Sec-tRNA synthase. The majority of these indirect pathways are widely spread in all domains of life and thought to be part of the evolutionary process.     

Functions and interplay of the tRNA-binding sites of the ribosome

The ribosome translates the genetic information of an mRNA molecule into a sequence of amino acids. The ribosome utilizes tRNAs to connect elements of the RNA and protein worlds during protein synthesis, i.e. an anticodon as a unit of genetic information with the corresponding amino acid as a building unit of proteins. Three tRNA-binding sites are located on the ribosome, termed the A, P and E sites. In recent years the tRNA-binding sites have been localized on the ribosome by three different techniques, small-angle neutron scattering, cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray analyses of 70 S crystals. These high-resolution glimpses into various ribosomal states together with a large body of biochemical data reveal an intricate interplay between the tRNAs and the three ribosomal binding sites, providing an explanation for the remarkable features of the ribosome, such as the ability to select the correct ternary complex aminoacyl-tRNA.EF-Tu.GTP out of more than 40 extremely similar tRNA complexes, the precise movement of the tRNA(2).mRNA complex during translocation and the maintenance of the reading frame.     

Translocation of a tRNA with an extended anticodon through the ribosome

Coordinated translocation of the tRNA-mRNA complex by the ribosome occurs in a precise, stepwise movement corresponding to a distance of three nucleotides along the mRNA. Frameshift suppressor tRNAs generally contain an extra nucleotide in the anticodon loop and they subvert the normal mechanisms used by the ribosome for frame maintenance. The mechanism by which suppressor tRNAs traverse the ribosome during translocation is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate translocation of a tRNA by four nucleotides from the A site to the P site, and from the P site to the E site. We show that translocation of a punctuated mRNA is possible with an extra, unpaired nucleotide between codons. Interestingly, the NMR structure of the four nucleotide anticodon stem-loop reveals a conformation different from the canonical tRNA structure. Flexibility within the loop may allow conformational adjustment upon A site binding and for interacting with the four nucleotide codon in order to shift the mRNA reading frame.     

Kinetic basis for global loss of fidelity arising from mismatches in the P-site codon:anticodon helix

Faithful decoding of the genetic information by the ribosome relies on kinetically driven mechanisms that promote selection of cognate substrates during elongation. Recently, we have shown that in addition to these kinetically driven mechanisms, the ribosome possesses a post peptidyl transfer quality control system that retrospectively monitors the codon–anticodon interaction in the P site, triggering substantial losses in the specificity of the A site during subsequent tRNA and RF selection when a mistake has occurred. Here, we report a detailed kinetic analysis of tRNA selection in the context of a mismatched P-site codon:anticodon interaction. We observe pleiotropic effects of a P-site mismatch on tRNA selection, such that near-cognate tRNA is processed by the ribosome almost as efficiently as cognate. In particular, after a miscoding event, near-cognate codon–anticodon complexes are stabilized on the ribosome to an extent similar to that observed for cognate ones. Moreover, the two observed forward rates of GTPase activation and accommodation are greatly accelerated (∼10-fold) for near-cognate tRNAs. Because the ensemble of effects of a mismatched P site on substrate selection were found to be different from those reported for other ribosomal perturbations and miscoding agents, we propose that the structural integrity of the mRNA–tRNA helix in the P site provides a distinct molecular switch that dictates the specificity of the A site.     

Genome Expansion by tRNA +1 Frameshifting at Quadruplet Codons

Inducing tRNA +1 frameshifting to read a quadruplet codon has the potential to incorporate a non-canonical amino acid (ncAA) into the polypeptide chain. While this strategy is attractive for genome expansion in biotechnology and bioengineering endeavors, improving the yield is hampered by a lack of understanding of where the shift can occur in an elongation cycle of protein synthesis. Lacking a clear answer to this question, current efforts have focused on designing +1-frameshifting tRNAs with an extra nucleotide inserted to the anticodon loop for pairing with a quadruplet codon in the aminoacyl-tRNA binding (A) site of the ribosome. However, the designed and evolved +1-frameshifting tRNAs vary broadly in achieving successful genome expansion. Here we summarize recent work on +1-frameshifting tRNAs. We suggest that, rather than engineering the quadruplet anticodon-codon pairing scheme at the ribosome A site, efforts should be made to engineer the pairing scheme at steps after the A site, including the step of the subsequent translocation and the step that stabilizes the pairing scheme in the +1-frame in the peptidyl-tRNA binding (P) site.     

Idiosyncratic tuning of tRNAs to achieve uniform ribosome binding

The binding of seven tRNA anticodons to their complementary codons on Escherichia coli ribosomes was substantially impaired, as compared with the binding of their natural tRNAs, when they were transplanted into tRNA(2)(Ala). An analysis of chimeras composed of tRNA(2)(Ala) and various amounts of either tRNA(3)(Gly) or tRNA(2)(Arg) indicates that the presence of the parental 32-38 nucleotide pair is sufficient to restore ribosome binding of the transplanted anticodons. Furthermore, mutagenesis of tRNA(2)(Ala) showed that its highly conserved A32-U38 pair serves to weaken ribosome affinity. We propose that this negative binding determinant is used to offset the very tight codon-anticodon interaction of tRNA(2)(Ala). This suggests that each tRNA sequence has coevolved with its anticodon to tune ribosome affinity to a value that is the same for all tRNAs.     

Orientations of transfer RNA in the ribosomal A and P sites.

In protein synthesis, peptide bond formation requires that the tRNA carrying the amino acid (A site tRNA) contact the tRNA carrying the growing peptide chain (P site tRNA) at their 3' termini. Two models have been proposed for the orientations of two tRNAs as they would be bound to the mRNA in the ribosome. Viewing the tRNA as an upside down L, anticodon loop pointing down, acceptor stem pointing right, and calling this the front view, the R (Rich) model would have the back of the P site tRNA facing the front of the A site tRNA. In the S (Sundaralingam) model the front of the P site tRNA faces the back of the A site tRNA. Models of two tRNAs bound to mRNA as they would be positioned in the ribosomal A and P sites have been created using MC-SYM, a constraint satisfaction search program designed to build nucleic acid structures. The models incorporate information from fluorescence energy transfer experiments and chemical crosslinks. The models that best answer the constraints are of the S variety, with no R conformations produced consistent with the constraints.     

Transfer RNA Identity Change in Anticodon Variants of E. coli tRNAPhe in Vivo

The anticodon sequence is a major recognition element for most aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. We investigated the in vivo effects of changing the anticodon on the aminoacylation specificity in the example of E. coli tRNA^Phe. Constructing different anticodon mutants of E. coli tRNA^Phe by site-directed mutagenesis, we isolated 22 anticodon mutant tRNA^Phe; the anticodons corresponded to 16 amino acids and an opal stop codon. To examine whether the mutant tRNAs had changed their amino acid acceptor specificity in vivo, we tested the viability of E. coli strains containing these tRNA^Phe genes in a medium which permitted tRNA induction. Fourteen mutant tRNA genes did not affect host viability. However, eight mutant tRNA genes were toxic to the host and prevented growth, presumably because the anticodon mutants led to translational errors. Many mutant tRNAs which did not affect host viability were not aminoacylated in vivo. Three mutant tRNAs containing anticodon sequences corresponding to lysine (UUU), methionine (CAU) and threonine (UGU) were charged with the amino acid corresponding to their anticodon, but not with phenylalanine. These three tRNAs and tRNA^Phe are located in the same cluster in a sequence similarity dendrogram of total E. coli tRNAs. The results support the idea that such tRNAs arising from in vivo evolution are derived by anticodon change from the same ancestor tRNA.     

Effect of modification of tRNA nucleotide 37 on the tRNA interaction with the A and P sites of the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome

The modified nucleotide 3′ of the tRNA anticodon is an important structural element that regulates the codon-anticodon interaction in the ribosome by stacking with codon-anticodon bases. The presence and identity (pyrimidine, purine, or modified purine) of this nucleotide significantly affects the energy of stacking in the A and P sites of the ribosome. Modification of nucleotide 37 does not contribute to stacking in the A site of the 70S ribosome, while its effect is substantial in the P site. The enthalpies of tRNA interactions with the A and P sites in the ribosome are similar and considerably lower than the enthalpy of the interactions of two tRNAs with the cognate anticodons in solution, suggesting that the ribosome contributes to the enthalpy-related portion of the free energy of tRNA binding by directly forming additional interactions with tRNA or by indirectly stabilizing the conformation of the codon-anticodon complex. In addition to stacking, tRNA binding in the A and P sites is further stabilized by interactions that involve magnesium ions. The number of ions involved in the formation of the tRNA-ribosome complex depends on the identity of tRNA nucleotide 37.     

Role of the three consecutive G:C base pairs conserved in the anticodon stem of initiator tRNAs in initiation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli.

The three consecutive G:C base pairs, G29:C41, G30:C40, and G31:C39, are conserved in the anticodon stem of virtually all initiator tRNAs from eubacteria, eukaryotes, and archaebacteria. We show that these G:C base pairs are important for function of the tRNA in initiation of protein synthesis in vivo. We changed these base pairs individually and in combinations and analyzed the activities of the mutant Escherichia coli initiator tRNAs in initiation in vivo. For assessment of activity of the mutant tRNAs in vivo, mutations in the G:C base pairs were coupled to mutation in the anticodon sequence from CAU to CUA. Mutations in each of the G:C base pairs reduced activity of the mutant tRNA in initiation, with mutation in the second G:C base pair having the most severe effect. The greatly reduced activity of this C30:G40 mutant tRNA is not due to defects in aminoacylation or formulation of the tRNA or defects in base modification of the A37, next to the anticodon, which we had previously shown to be important for activity of the mutant tRNAs in initiation. The anticodon stem mutants are most likely affected specifically at the step of binding to the ribosomal P site. The pattern of cleavages in the anticodon loop of mutant tRNAs by S1 nuclease indicate that the G:C base pairs may be involved directly in interactions of the tRNA with components of the P site on the ribosome rather than indirectly by inducing a particular conformation of the anticodon loop critical for function of the tRNA in initiation.     

The 51-63 base pair of tRNA confers specificity for binding by EF-Tu

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) exhibits significant specificity for the different elongator tRNA bodies in order to offset its variable affinity to the esterified amino acid. Three X-ray cocrystal structures reveal that while most of the contacts with the protein involve the phosphodiester backbone of tRNA, a single hydrogen bond is observed between the Glu390 and the amino group of a guanine in the 51-63 base pair in the T-stem of tRNA. Here we show that the Glu390Ala mutation of Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu selectively destabilizes binding of those tRNAs containing a guanine at either position 51 or 63 and that mutagenesis of the 51-63 base pair in several tRNAs modulates their binding affinities to EF-Tu. A comparison of Escherichia coli tRNA sequences suggests that this specificity mechanism is conserved across the bacterial domain. While this contact is an important specificity determinant, it is clear that others remain to be identified.     

Non-bridging phosphate oxygen atoms within the tRNA anticodon stem-loop are essential for ribosomal A site binding and translocation

The conformation of the anticodon stem-loop of tRNAs required for correct decoding by the ribosome depends on intramolecular and intermolecular interactions that are independent of the tRNA nucleotide sequence. Non-bridging phosphate oxygen atoms have been shown to be critical for the structure and function of several RNAs. However, little is known about the role they play in ribosomal A site binding and translocation of tRNA to the P site. Here, we show that non-bridging phosphate oxygen atoms within the tRNA anticodon stem-loop at positions 33, 35, and 37 are important for A site binding. Those at positions 34 and 36 are not necessary for binding, but are essential for translocation. Our results correlate with structural data, indicating that position 34 interacts with the highly conserved 16S rRNA base G966 and position 36 interacts with the universally conserved tRNA base U33 during translocation to the P site.     

Modified tRNAs for probing tRNA binding sites on the ribosome

Unusual chemical properties of hypermodified nucleosides N6-(threoninocarbonyl)adenosine (t6 A) located at position 37 and 3-(3-amino-3-carboxypropyl)uridine (acp3U) located at position 20:1 have been utilized for the introduction of photoreactive azidonitrophenyl probes to the anticodon loop and to the dihydrouridine loop of yeast tRNA(mMet) and lupin tRNA(mMet), respectively. The very efficient and selective modification procedures involve condensat on of the carboxyl group of t6A with ethylenediamine in the presence of a water soluble carbodiimide followed by acylation of the newly introduced amino group with the respective N-hydroxysuccinimide ester, and acylation of the primary amino or up of acp3U with the respective N-hydroxysuccinimide ester. Binding and crosslinking of the modified, uncharged tRNAs to E coli ribosome have been studied in the presence and absence of poly(AUG) as a message. Both tRNAs carrying about 20 A long photoreactive probes retain their binding activity and upon irradiation with visible light crosslink to the ribosome with high yields showing their usefulness for structural studies on the tRNA-ribosome complex.     

Steric Complementarity in the Decoding Center Is Important for tRNA Selection by the Ribosome

Accurate tRNA selection by the ribosome is essential for the synthesis of functional proteins. Previous structural studies indicated that the ribosome distinguishes between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs by monitoring the geometry of the codon–anticodon helix in the decoding center using the universally conserved 16S ribosomal RNA bases G530, A1492 and A1493. These bases form hydrogen bonds with the 2′-hydroxyl groups of the codon–anticodon helix, which are expected to be disrupted with a near-cognate codon–anticodon helix. However, a recent structural study showed that G530, A1492 and A1493 form hydrogen bonds in a manner identical with that of both cognate and near-cognate codon–anticodon helices. To understand how the ribosome discriminates between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs, we made 2′-deoxynucleotide and 2′-fluoro substituted mRNAs, which disrupt the hydrogen bonds between the A site codon and G530, A1492 and A1493. Our results show that multiple 2′-deoxynucleotide substitutions in the mRNA substantially inhibit tRNA selection, whereas multiple 2′-fluoro substitutions in the mRNA have only modest effects on tRNA selection. Furthermore, the miscoding antibiotics paromomycin and streptomycin rescue the defects in tRNA selection with the multiple 2′-deoxynucleotide substituted mRNA. These results suggest that steric complementarity in the decoding center is more important than the hydrogen bonds between the A site codon and G530, A1492 and A1493 for tRNA selection.     

Calculation of the relative geometry of tRNAs in the ribosome from directed hydroxyl-radical probing data

The many interactions of tRNA with the ribosome are fundamental to protein synthesis. During the peptidyl transferase reaction, the acceptor ends of the aminoacyl and peptidyl tRNAs must be in close proximity to allow peptide bond formation, and their respective anticodons must base pair simultaneously with adjacent trinucleotide codons on the mRNA. The two tRNAs in this state can be arranged in two nonequivalent general configurations called the R and S orientations, many versions of which have been proposed for the geometry of tRNAs in the ribosome. Here, we report the combined use of computational analysis and tethered hydroxyl-radical probing to constrain their arrangement. We used Fe(II) tethered to the 5' end of anticodon stem-loop analogs (ASLs) of tRNA and to the 5' end of deacylated tRNA(Phe) to generate hydroxyl radicals that probe proximal positions in the backbone of adjacent tRNAs in the 70S ribosome. We inferred probe-target distances from the resulting RNA strand cleavage intensities and used these to calculate the mutual arrangement of A-site and P-site tRNAs in the ribosome, using three different structure estimation algorithms. The two tRNAs are constrained to the S configuration with an angle of about 45 degrees between the respective planes of the molecules. The terminal phosphates of 3'CCA are separated by 23 A when using the tRNA crystal conformations, and the anticodon arms of the two tRNAs are sufficiently close to interact with adjacent codons in mRNA.