Crystal structure of a plant leucine rich repeat protein with two island domains

Leucine rich repeat(LRR)domain,characterized by a repetitive sequence pattern rich in leucine residues,is a universal protein-protein interaction motif present in all life forms.LRR repeats interrupted by sequences of 30 70 residues(termed island domain,ID)have been found in some plant LRR receptor-like kinases(RLKs)and animal Toll-like receptors(TLR7-9).Recent studies provide insight into how a single ID is structurally integrated into an LRR protein.However,structural information on an LRR protein with two IDs is lacking.The receptor-like protein kinase 2(RPK2)is an LRR-RLK and has important roles in controlling plant growth and development by perception and transduction of hormone signal.Here we present the crystal structure of the extracellular LRR domain of RPK2(RPK2-LRR)containing two IDs from Arabidopsis.The structure reveals that both of the IDs are helical and located at the central region of the single RPK2-LRR solenoid.One of them binds to the inner surface of the solenoid,whereas the other one mainly interacts with the lateral side.Unexpectedly,a long loop immediately following the N-terminal capping domain of RPK2-LRR is presented toward and sandwiched between the two IDs,further stabilizing their embedding to the LRR solenoid.A potential ligand binding site formed by the two IDs and the solenoid is located at the C-terminal side of RPK2-LRR.The structural information of RPK2-LRR broadens our understanding toward the large family of LRR proteins and provides insight into RPK2-mediated signaling.     

The tomato I gene for Fusarium wilt resistance encodes an atypical leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like protein whose function is nevertheless dependent on SOBIR1 and SERK3/BAK1

We have identified the tomato I gene for resistance to the Fusarium wilt fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) and show that it encodes a membrane‐anchored leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like protein (LRR‐RLP). Unlike most other LRR‐RLP genes involved in plant defence, the I gene is not a member of a gene cluster and contains introns in its coding sequence. The I gene encodes a loopout domain larger than those in most other LRR‐RLPs, with a distinct composition rich in serine and threonine residues. The I protein also lacks a basic cytosolic domain. Instead, this domain is rich in aromatic residues that could form a second transmembrane domain. The I protein recognises the Fol Avr1 effector protein, but, unlike many other LRR‐RLPs, recognition specificity is determined in the C‐terminal half of the protein by polymorphic amino acid residues in the LRRs just preceding the loopout domain and in the loopout domain itself. Despite these differences, we show that I/Avr1‐dependent necrosis in Nicotiana benthamiana depends on the LRR receptor‐like kinases (RLKs) SERK3/BAK1 and SOBIR1. Sequence comparisons revealed that the I protein and other LRR‐RLPs involved in plant defence all carry residues in their last LRR and C‐terminal LRR capping domain that are conserved with SERK3/BAK1‐interacting residues in the same relative positions in the LRR‐RLKs BRI1 and PSKR1. Tyrosine mutations of two of these conserved residues, Q922 and T925, abolished I/Avr1‐dependent necrosis in N. benthamiana, consistent with similar mutations in BRI1 and PSKR1 preventing their interaction with SERK3/BAK1.     

PIRLs: a novel class of plant intracellular leucine-rich repeat proteins

Leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins feature tandem leucine-rich motifs that form a protein-protein interaction domain. Plants contain diverse classes of LRR proteins, many of which take part in signal transduction. We have identified a novel family of nine Arabidopsis LRR proteins that, based on predicted intracellular location and LRR motif consensus sequence, are related to Ras-binding LRR proteins found in signaling complexes in animals and yeast. This new class has been named plant intracellular Ras group-related LRR proteins (PIRLs). We have characterized PIRL cDNAs, rigorously defined gene and protein annotations, investigated gene family evolution and surveyed mRNA expression. While LRR regions suggested a relationship to Ras group LRR proteins, outside of their LRR domains PIRLs differed from Ras group proteins, exhibiting N- and C-terminal regions containing low complexity stretches and clusters of charged amino acids. PIRL genes grouped into three subfamilies based on sequence relationships and gene structures. Related gene pairs and dispersed chromosomal locations suggested family expansion by ancestral genomic or segmental duplications. Expression surveys revealed that all PIRL mRNAs are actively transcribed, with three expressed differentially in leaves, roots or flowers. These results define PIRLs as a distinct, plant-specific class of intracellular LRR proteins that probably mediate protein interactions, possibly in the context of signal transduction. T-DNA knock-out mutants have been isolated as a starting point for systematic functional analysis of this intriguing family.     

Comparative structural analysis of the binding domain of follicle stimulating hormone receptor

Proteins with leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) specialize in mediating protein-protein interactions. The hormone binding portion of the receptor for follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is an LRR protein by sequence, and the crystal structure of this domain from human FSH receptor in a complex with FSH shows that it does indeed have an LRR structure. It differs from other LRR domains, however, in being an all-beta protein composed of highly irregular repeats and having only slight overall curvature. Despite these distinctions and a superficial resemblance to beta-helical proteins, the binding domain of FSH receptor clearly is an LRR protein. The structure does consist of two parts with distinctively different curvatures. Comparison with the structures of other LRR-containing proteins shows a correlation between curvature and main-chain hydrogen bonding pattern of the parallel beta-sheet. The hormone-binding site is located at the concave surface of the receptor structure, a feature common to proteins with LRR motifs. Analysis of the ligand-binding site of LRR-containing proteins reveals that they generally utilize extensive interface area and a large number of charged residues to facilitate high-affinity protein-protein interactions.     

Interaction between domains of a plant NBS-LRR protein in disease resistance-related cell death

Many plant disease resistance (R) genes encode proteins predicted to have an N-terminal coiled-coil (CC) domain, a central nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain and a C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain. These CC-NBS-LRR proteins recognize specific pathogen-derived products and initiate a resistance response that often includes a type of cell death known as the hypersensitive response (HR). Co-expression of the potato CC-NBS-LRR protein Rx and its elicitor, the PVX coat protein (CP), results in a rapid HR. Surprisingly, co-expression of the LRR and CC-NBS as separate domains also resulted in a CP-dependent HR. Likewise, the CC domain complemented a version of Rx lacking this domain (NBS- LRR). Correspondingly, the LRR domain interacted physically in planta with the CC-NBS, as did CC with NBS-LRR. Both interactions were disrupted in the presence of CP. However, the interaction between CC and NBS-LRR was dependent on a wild-type P-loop motif, whereas the interaction between CC-NBS and LRR was not. We propose that activation of Rx entails sequential disruption of at least two intramolecular interactions.     

The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of the Potato Rx disease resistance protein function in pathogen recognition and signaling

Plant genomes encode large numbers of nucleotide binding and leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins, some of which mediate the recognition of pathogen-encoded proteins. Following recognition, the initiation of a resistance response is thought to be mediated by the domains present at the N termini of NB-LRR proteins, either a Toll and Interleukin-1 Receptor or a coiled-coil (CC) domain. In order to understand the role of the CC domain in NB-LRR function, we have undertaken a systematic structure-function analysis of the CC domain of the potato (Solanum tuberosum) CC-NB-LRR protein Rx, which confers resistance to Potato virus X. We show that the highly conserved EDVID motif of the CC domain mediates an intramolecular interaction that is dependent on several domains within the rest of the Rx protein, including the NB and LRR domains. Other conserved and nonconserved regions of the CC domain mediate the interaction with the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP2, a protein required for Rx function. Furthermore, we show that the Rx NB domain is sufficient for inducing cell death typical of hypersensitive plant resistance responses. We describe a model of CC-NB-LRR function wherein the LRR and CC domains coregulate the signaling activity of the NB domain in a recognition-specific manner.     

Basolateral targeting by leucine-rich repeat domains in epithelial cells

The asymmetric distribution of proteins to basolateral and apical membranes is an important feature of epithelial cell polarity. To investigate how basolateral LAP proteins (LRR (for leucine-rich repeats) and PDZ (for PSD-95/Discs-large/ZO-1), which play key roles in cell polarity, reach their target membrane, we carried out a structure–function study of three LAP proteins: Caenorhabditis elegans LET-413, human Erbin and human Scribble (hScrib). Deletion and point mutation analyses establish that their LRR domain is crucial for basolateral membrane targeting. This property is specific to the LRR domain of LAP proteins, as the non-LAP protein SUR-8 does not localize at the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells, despite having a closely related LRR domain. Importantly, functional studies of LET-413 in C. elegans show that although its PDZ domain is dispensable during embryogenesis, its LRR domain is essential. Our data establish a novel paradigm for protein localization by showing that a subset of LRR domains direct subcellular localization in polarized cells.     

Serine and threonine phosphorylation of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein by protein kinase Calpha regulates endocytosis and association with adaptor molecules

The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) is a large receptor that participates in endocytosis, signaling pathways, and phagocytosis of necrotic cells. Mechanisms that direct LRP to function in these distinct pathways likely involve its association with distinct cytoplasmic adaptor proteins. We tested the hypothesis that the association of various adaptor proteins with the LRP cytoplasmic domain is modulated by its phosphorylation state. Phosphoamino acid analysis of metabolically labeled LRP revealed that this receptor is phosphorylated at serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues within its cytoplasmic domain, whereas inhibitor studies identified protein kinase Calpha (PKCalpha) as a kinase capable of phosphorylating LRP. Mutational analysis identified critical threonine and serine residues within the LRP cytoplasmic domain that are necessary for phosphorylation mediated by PKCalpha. Mutating these threonine and serine residues to alanines generated a receptor that was not phosphorylated and that was internalized more rapidly than wild-type LRP, revealing that phosphorylation reduces the association of LRP with adaptor molecules of the endocytic machinery. In contrast, serine and threonine phosphorylation was necessary for the interaction of LRP with Shc, an adaptor protein that participates in signaling events. Furthermore, serine and threonine phosphorylation increased the interaction of LRP with other adaptor proteins such as Dab-1 and CED-6/GULP. These results indicate that phosphorylation of LRP by PKCalpha modulates the endocytic and signaling function of LRP by modifying its association with adaptor proteins.     

Designing repeat proteins: modular leucine-rich repeat protein libraries based on the mammalian ribonuclease inhibitor family

We present a novel approach to design repeat proteins of the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) family for the generation of libraries of intracellular binding molecules. From an analysis of naturally occurring LRR proteins, we derived the concept to assemble repeat proteins with randomized surface positions from libraries of consensus repeat modules. As a guiding principle, we used the mammalian ribonuclease inhibitor (RI) family, which comprises cytosolic LRR proteins known for their extraordinary affinities to many RNases. By aligning the amino acid sequences of the internal repeats of human, pig, rat, and mouse RI, we derived a first consensus sequence for the characteristic alternating 28 and 29 amino acid residue A-type and B-type repeats. Structural considerations were used to replace all conserved cysteine residues, to define less conserved positions, and to decide where to introduce randomized amino acid residues. The so devised consensus RI repeat library was generated at the DNA level and assembled by stepwise ligation to give libraries of 2-12 repeats. Terminal capping repeats, known to shield the continuous hydrophobic core of the LRR domain from the surrounding solvent, were adapted from human RI. In this way, designed LRR protein libraries of 4-14 LRRs (equivalent to 130-415 amino acid residues) were obtained. The biophysical analysis of randomly chosen library members showed high levels of soluble expression in the Escherichia coli cytosol, monomeric behavior as characterized by gel-filtration, and alpha-helical CD spectra, confirming the success of our design approach.     

Leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like kinase II phylogenetics reveals five main clades throughout the plant kingdom

Receptor‐like kinases (RLKs) represent the largest group of cell surface receptors in plants. The monophyletic leucine‐rich repeat (LRR)‐RLK subfamily II is considered to contain the somatic embryogenesis receptor kinases (SERKs) and NSP‐interacting kinases known to be involved in developmental processes and cellular immunity in plants. There are only a few published studies on the phylogenetics of LRR‐RLKII; unfortunately these suffer from poor taxon/gene sampling. Hence, it is not clear how many and what main clades this family contains, let alone what structure–function relationships exist. We used 1342 protein sequences annotated as ‘SERK’ and ‘SERK‐like’ plus related sequences in order to estimate phylogeny within the LRR‐RLKII clade, using the nematode protein kinase Pelle as an outgroup. We reconstruct five main clades (LRR‐RLKII 1–5), in each of which the main pattern of land plant relationships re‐occurs, confirming previous hypotheses that duplication events happened in this gene subfamily prior to divergence among land plant lineages. We show that domain structures and intron–exon boundaries within the five clades are well conserved in evolution. Furthermore, phylogenetic patterns based on the separate LRR and kinase parts of LRR‐RLKs are incongruent: whereas the LRR part supports a LRR‐RLKII 2/3 sister group relationship, the kinase part supports clades 1/2. We infer that the kinase part includes few ‘radical’ amino acid changes compared with the LRR part. Finally, our results confirm that amino acids involved in each LRR‐RLKII–receptor complex interaction are located at N‐capping residues, and that the short amino acid motifs of this interaction domain are highly conserved throughout evolution within the five LRR‐RLKII clades.     

An autophosphorylation site database for leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like kinases in Arabidopsis thaliana

Leucine‐rich repeat receptor‐like kinases (LRR RLKs) form a large family of plant signaling proteins consisting of an extracellular domain connected by a single‐pass transmembrane sequence to a cytoplasmic kinase domain. Autophosphorylation on specific Ser and/or Thr residues in the cytoplasmic domain is often critical for the activation of several LRR RLK family members with proven functional roles in plant growth regulation, morphogenesis, disease resistance, and stress responses. While identification and functional characterization of in vivo phosphorylation sites is ultimately required for a full understanding of LRR RLK biology and function, bacterial expression of recombinant LRR RLK cytoplasmic catalytic domains for identification of in vitro autophosphorylation sites provides a useful resource for further targeted identification and functional analysis of in vivo sites. In this study we employed high‐throughput cloning and a variety of mass spectrometry approaches to generate an autophosphorylation site database representative of more than 30% of the approximately 223 LRR RLKs in Arabidopsis thaliana. We used His‐tagged constructs of complete cytoplasmic domains to identify a total of 592 phosphorylation events across 73 LRR RLKs, with 497 sites uniquely assigned to specific Ser (268 sites) or Thr (229 sites) residues in 68 LRR RLKs. Multiple autophosphorylation sites per LRR RLK were the norm, with an average of seven sites per cytoplasmic domain, while some proteins showed more than 20 unique autophosphorylation sites. The database was used to analyze trends in the localization of phosphorylation sites across cytoplasmic kinase subdomains and to derive a statistically significant sequence motif for phospho‐Ser autophosphorylation.     

The cytoplasmic domain of the LDL receptor-related protein regulates multiple steps in APP processing

The low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) has recently been implicated in numerous intracellular signaling functions, as well as in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. Studies have shown that the beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP) interacts with LRP and that this association may impact the production of amyloid beta-protein (Abeta). In this report, we provide evidence that LRP regulates trafficking of intracellular proteins independently of its lipoprotein receptor functions. We show that in the absence of LRP, Abeta production, APP secretion, APP internalization, turnover of full-length APP and stability of APP C-terminal fragments are affected. Importantly, these changes are not APP isoform dependent. Using deletion constructs, the critical region in LRP that modulates APP processing was mapped to a seven peptide domain around the second NPXY domain (residues 4504-4510). Therefore, we propose a model by which LRP functionally modulates APP processing, including those steps critical for Abeta production, through interactions of the cytosolic domains.     

Structural Determinants at the Interface of the ARC2 and Leucine-Rich Repeat Domains Control the Activation of the Plant Immune Receptors Rx1 and Gpa2

Many plant and animal immune receptors have a modular nucleotide-binding-leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) architecture in which a nucleotide-binding switch domain, NB-ARC, is tethered to a LRR sensor domain. The cooperation between the switch and sensor domains, which regulates the activation of these proteins, is poorly understood. Here, we report structural determinants governing the interaction between the NB-ARC and LRR in the highly homologous plant immune receptors Gpa2 and Rx1, which recognize the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida and Potato virus X, respectively. Systematic shuffling of polymorphic sites between Gpa2 and Rx1 showed that a minimal region in the ARC2 and N-terminal repeats of the LRR domain coordinate the activation state of the protein. We identified two closely spaced amino acid residues in this region of the ARC2 (positions 401 and 403) that distinguish between autoactivation and effector-triggered activation. Furthermore, a highly acidic loop region in the ARC2 domain and basic patches in the N-terminal end of the LRR domain were demonstrated to be required for the physical interaction between the ARC2 and LRR. The NB-ARC and LRR domains dissociate upon effector-dependent activation, and the complementary-charged regions are predicted to mediate a fast reassociation, enabling multiple rounds of activation. Finally, we present a mechanistic model showing how the ARC2, NB, and N-terminal half of the LRR form a clamp, which regulates the dissociation and reassociation of the switch and sensor domains in NB-LRR proteins.Resistance (R) proteins play a central role in the recognition-based immune system of plants. Unlike vertebrates, plants lack an adaptive immune system with highly specialized immune cells. Instead, they rely on an innate immune system in which each cell is autonomous. Two types of immune receptors can be distinguished in plants, pathogen-associated molecular patterns recognition receptors that detect conserved molecular patterns in plant pathogens and intracellular R proteins that recognize specific effectors employed by pathogens as modifiers of host metabolism or defense mechanisms (Jones and Dangl, 2006). Effector-triggered activation of R proteins leads to an array of protective responses, often culminating in programmed cell death at the site of infection (Greenberg and Yao, 2004), thereby preventing further ingress of the pathogen. Pathogens have evolved mechanisms to evade recognition by R proteins and to regain their virulence (Dodds and Rathjen, 2010). This continuous coevolutionary process between host and pathogen has resulted in a reservoir of highly diverse R proteins in plants, enabling them to counteract a wide range of pathogens and pests.The most common class of R proteins consists of nucleotide-binding (NB)-leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins with a tripartite domain architecture, which roughly corresponds to an N-terminal response domain (a coiled coil [CC] or Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor [TIR] domain) involved in downstream signaling, a central molecular switch domain (the NB domain present in the mammalian apoptosis regulator Apaf1, plant R proteins, and the Caenorhabditis elegans apoptosis regulator CED4 [NB-ARC]), and a C-terminal sensor domain (the LRR domain). The NB-ARC domain is an extended nucleotide-binding domain that plant immune receptors share with metazoan apoptosis regulators and immune receptors such as Apaf1, CED4, and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD-like) receptors (NLRs) and belongs to the STAND (signal transduction ATPases with numerous domains) family of nucleoside triphosphatase domains (van der Biezen and Jones, 1998; Leipe et al., 2004; Albrecht and Takken, 2006; Maekawa et al., 2011b). The overall modular architecture of metazoan STAND nucleoside triphosphatase is similar to that of NB-LRR plant immune receptors, but the domains flanking the NB-ARC domain often differ. In NLRs, for example, several N-terminal domains can be found, including caspase-recruiting domains and Pyrin domains (Proell et al., 2008). In the mammalian protein Apaf1, the sensor involved in cytochrome c detection consists of C-terminal WD40 repeats (Zou et al., 1997).In plant NB-LRR resistance proteins, the recognition of a pathogen effector via the LRR domain is thought to switch the conformation of the protein from a closed, autoinhibited “off” state into an open, active “on” state (Lukasik and Takken, 2009). The activation of NB-LRR proteins is most likely a multistep process in which the NB-ARC domain plays a central role. The three subdomains of the NB-ARC, the NB, ARC1, and ARC2, collectively form a nucleotide-binding pocket that adopts different conformations depending on the bound nucleotide. This mechanism seems to be conserved between proteins from organisms as distant as bacteria, metazoans, and plants (Rairdan and Moffett, 2007; Danot et al., 2009; Takken and Tameling, 2009). The conformational change coincides with the exchange of bound ADP for ATP in the NB-ARC, probably stabilizing the active conformation (Tameling et al., 2006; Ade et al., 2007). Hydrolysis of the bound ATP is hypothesized to return the domains to their inactive state. The exact mechanism by which elicitor recognition via the LRR leads to a conformational change of the NB-ARC and the subsequent activation of immune signaling pathways is not clear.Previous studies have shown that the CC/TIR, NB-ARC, and LRR domains in plant immune receptors interact and cooperate with each other in an interdependent manner (Moffett et al., 2002; Leister et al., 2005; Ade et al., 2007; Rairdan et al., 2008). From these data, a picture emerges in which the LRR domain is not only involved in pathogen recognition, but also plays a role in maintaining an autoinhibited resting state in the absence of pathogens via its interactions with the other domains (Bendahmane et al., 2002; Hwang and Williamson, 2003; Ade et al., 2007; Qi et al., 2012). A similar role as regulatory domain has been found for the sensor domains of other NLRs, such as the mammalian Apaf1 (Hu et al., 1998). For the potato (Solanum tuberosum) immune receptor Rx1, a model plant NB-LRR protein, it has been shown that the LRR cooperates with the ARC subdomains in retaining the inactive state of the protein. The deletion of the ARC and LRR domains leads to a constitutive activity of the NB (Bendahmane et al., 2002; Rairdan et al., 2008). In addition, it was demonstrated that the elicitor, the Potato virus X (PVX) coat protein, modifies the interdomain interactions in Rx1 (Moffett et al., 2002; Rairdan et al., 2008). Sequence exchanges between Rx1 and the highly homologous nematode resistance protein Gpa2 (88% amino acid identity) resulted in incompatibilities between the domains that give rise to inappropriate activation of cell death responses (Rairdan and Moffett, 2006), indicating that the cooperation between the sensor and switch domains depends on an interaction fine tuned by intramolecular coevolution. In this light, it is interesting to note that a functional ortholog of Rx1, Rx2 from Solanum acaule, is almost identical to Rx1 in its LRR region but displays a higher similarity to Gpa2 in stretches of its CC-NB-ARC sequence (Bendahmane et al., 2000).The aim of our study was to pinpoint the molecular determinants controlling the switch between the resting and activation state of NB-LRR proteins. The incompatibility between the ARC and LRR domains of Rx1 and Gpa2 was used as a guideline to dissect the molecular and structural determinants involved in the cooperation between the switch (NB-ARC) and sensor (LRR) domain. An extensive exchange of polymorphic residues between these two homologous NB-LRR proteins resulted in the identification of a minimal fragment of 68 amino acid residues in the ARC2 domain and the first LRR repeats as being crucial for proper activation of Gpa2 and Rx1. Within this minimal region, we identified two amino acids that, despite their proximity in the amino acid sequence, differentiate between elicitor-dependent (position 401) and independent activation (position 403). However, structural modeling of the domains shows that the residue at position 403 operates at the interface of the ARC2 and N-terminal part of the LRR domain, while residue 401 mapped at the interface between the ARC2 and NB domain. Furthermore, an acidic loop region in the ARC2 domain and complementary-charged basic patches in the N-terminal half of the LRR domain are shown to be required for the physical interaction between these domains. We demonstrate that the binding between the CC- NB-ARC and LRR domains is disrupted upon elicitor-dependent activation and that the complementary-charged residues are predicted to facilitate reassociation. Two independent docking simulations of the NB-ARC and LRR domain indicate that the LRR domain binds to the NB-ARC domain at the surface formed by the interaction of the ARC2 and NB subdomains. We present a mechanistic model in which the first repeats of the LRR, the ARC2 subdomain, and the NB form a clamp, which governs the shuttling between a closed, autoinhibited “off” state and an open, active “on” state of the resistance protein. Finally, we discuss the consequences of the functional constraints imposed by the interface of the NB, ARC2, and LRR domain for the generation of novel resistance specificities via evolutionary processes and genetic engineering.     

Motifs specific for the ADR1 NBS–LRR protein family in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis> are conserved among NBS–LRR sequences from both dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants

The activated disease resistance (ADR) 1 gene encodes a protein that possesses an N-terminal coiled-coil (CC) motif, nucleotide-binding site (NBS) and C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains. ADR1 belongs to a small, atypical Arabidopsis thaliana sub-class containing four CC–NBS–LRR genes. The NBS region of most NBS–LRR proteins possesses numerous conserved motifs. In contrast, the LRR domain, which is subject to positive selection, is highly variable. Surprisingly, sequence analysis revealed that the LRR domain of the ADR1 sub-class was more conserved than the NBS region. Sequence analysis identified two novel conserved motifs, termed TVS and PKAE, specific for this CC–NBS–LRR sub-class. The TVS motif is adjacent to the P-loop, whereas the PKAE motif corresponded to the inter-domain region termed the NBS–LRR linker, which was conserved within the different CC–NBS–LRR classes but varied among classes. These ADR1-specific motifs were employed to identify putative ADR1 homologs in phylogenetically distant and agronomically important plant species. Putative ADR1 homologs were identified in 11 species including rice and in 3 further Poaceae species. The ADR1 sub-class of CC–NBS–LRR proteins is therefore conserved in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant species.     

The Capping Domain in RalF Regulates Effector Functions

The Legionella pneumophila effector protein RalF functions as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) that activates the host small GTPase protein ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf), and recruits this host protein to the vacuoles in which this pathogen resides. GEF activity is conferred by the Sec7 domain located in the N-terminal region of RalF. Structural studies indicate that the C-terminal region of RalF makes contacts with residues in the Sec7 domain important for Arf interactions. Theoretically, the C-terminal region of RalF could prevent nucleotide exchange activity by blocking the ability of Arf to interact with the Sec7 domain. For this reason, the C-terminal region of RalF has been termed a capping domain. Here, the role of the RalF capping domain was investigated by comparing biochemical and effector activities mediated by this domain in both the Legionella RalF protein (LpRalF) and in a RalF ortholog isolated from the unrelated intracellular pathogen Rickettsia prowazekii (RpRalF). These data indicate that both RalF proteins contain a functional Sec7 domain and that the capping domain regulates RalF GEF activity. The capping domain has intrinsic determinants that mediate localization of the RalF protein inside of host cells and confer distinct effector activities. Localization mediated by the capping domain of LpRalF enables the GEF to modulate membrane transport in the secretory pathway, whereas, the capping domain of RpRalF enables this bacterial GEF to modulate actin dynamics occurring near the plasma membrane. Thus, these data reveal that divergence in the function of the C-terminal capping domain alters the in vivo functions of the RalF proteins.     

Whole-genome comparison of leucine-rich repeat extensins in Arabidopsis and rice. A conserved family of cell wall proteins form a vegetative and a reproductive clade

We have searched the Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa) genomes for homologs of LRX1, an Arabidopsis gene encoding a novel type of cell wall protein containing a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) and an extensin domain. Eleven and eight LRX (LRR/EXTENSIN) genes have been identified in these two plant species, respectively. The LRX gene family encodes proteins characterized by a short N-terminal domain, a domain with 10 LRRs, a cysteine-rich motif, and a variable C-terminal extensin-like domain. Phylogenetic analysis performed on the conserved domains indicates the existence of two major clades of LRX proteins that arose before the eudicot/monocot divergence and then diversified independently in each lineage. In Arabidopsis, gene expression studies by northern hybridization and promoter::uidA fusions showed that the two phylogenetic clades represent a specialization into "reproductive" and "vegetative" LRXs. The four Arabidopsis genes of the "reproductive" clade are specifically expressed in pollen, whereas the seven "vegetative" genes are predominantly expressed in various sporophytic tissues. This separation into two expression classes is also supported by previous studies on maize (Zea mays) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) LRX homologs and by information on available rice ESTs. The strong conservation of the amino acids responsible for the putative recognition specificity of the LRR domain throughout the family suggests that the LRX proteins interact with similar ligands.     

Characterization of LRP, a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) protein from tomato plants that is processed during pathogenesis

This paper describes the isolation and characterization of LRP , a new gene from tomato plants. The deduced amino acid sequence showed that the encoded protein is enriched in leucine, and contains interesting structural motifs. LRP contains four tandem repeats of a canonical 24 amino acid leucine-rich repeat (LRR) sequence present in different proteins that mediates molecular recognition and/or interaction processes. Genomic organization and intron-exon arrangement of LRP favor the hypothesis that the LRR domains present in LRP evolved by exon duplication and shuffling. LRP expression analysis and immunohisto-chemical localization studies of the encoded protein indicate that the gene is under developmental regulation exhibiting tissue-specificity, particularly in certain cell types of the stele, like phloem fibers, parenchyma cells of the protoxylem, and in the cell files that constitute the rays of the secondary xylem. It is shown that this gene is upregulated in diseased tomato plants infected with citrus exocortis viroid. However, in this pathogenic context, LRP is processed proteolytically to a lower molecular weight form by a host-induced extracellular protease. The structural characteristics of LRP, its spatio-temporal pattern of expression, and its post-translational processing during pathogenesis, suggest this protein as a candidate molecule that may mediate recognition and interaction events taking place in the plant extracellular matrix under normal and/or pathogenesis-related conditions.     

Plant receptor-like serine threonine kinases: roles in signaling and plant defense

Plants are hosts to a wide array of pathogens from all kingdoms of life. In the absence of an active immune system or combinatorial diversifications that lead to recombination-driven somatic gene flexibility, plants have evolved different strategies to combat both individual pathogen strains and changing pathogen populations. The receptor-like kinase (RLK) gene-family expansion in plants was hypothesized to have allowed accelerated evolution among domains implicated in signal reception, typically a leucine-rich repeat (LRR). Under that model, the gene-family expansion represents a plant-specific adaptation that leads to the production of numerous and variable cell surface and cytoplasmic receptors. More recently, it has emerged that the LRR domains of RLK interact with a diverse group of proteins leading to combinatorial variations in signal response specificity. Therefore, the RLK appear to play a central role in signaling during pathogen recognition, the subsequent activation of plant defense mechanisms, and developmental control. The future challenges will include determinations of RLK modes of action, the basis of recognition and specificity, which cellular responses each receptor mediates, and how both receptor and kinase domain interactions fit into the defense signaling cascades. These challenges will be complicated by the limited information that may be derived from the primary sequence of the LRR domain. The review focuses upon implications derived from recent studies of the secondary and tertiary structures of several plant RLK that change understanding of plant receptor function and signaling. In addition, the biological functions of plant and animal RLK-containing receptors were reviewed and commonalities among their signaling mechanisms identified. Further elucidated were the genomic and structural organizations of RLK gene families, with special emphasis on RLK implicated in resistance to disease and development.     

A leucine-rich repeat region is conserved in pollen extensin-like (Pex) proteins in monocots and dicots

We previously isolated a pollen-specific gene encoding a pollen tube wall-associated glycoprotein with a globular domain and an extensin domain from maize (mPex1). To evaluate which protein domains might be important for function, we isolated a second monocot gene (mPex2) and a dicot gene (tPex). Each gene encodes a signal sequence, an N-terminal globular domain comprised of a variable region, a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) with an adjacent cysteine-rich region, a transition region and an extensin-like C-terminal domain. The LRRs of the maize and tomato Pex proteins are highly conserved. Although the extensin domains in the maize and tomato proteins vary in length and in amino acid sequence, they are likely to be structurally conserved. Additional putative Pex gene sequences were identified by either GenBank search (Arabidopsis) or PCR (sorghum and potato); all encode conserved LRRs. The presence of a conserved LRR in the known and potential Pex proteins strongly suggests that this motif is involved in the binding of a specific ligand during pollen tube growth. Gene expression studies using RNA and protein blotting as well as promoter-reporter gene fusions in transient and stable transformation indicate that the tomato Pex gene is pollen-specific.