HDL and triglyceride as therapeutic targets

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Epidemiological studies have shown that plasma HDL-cholesterol is inversely related to coronary artery disease and that there is an inverse relationship between HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but it is now demonstrated that hypertriglyceridemia is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). The goal of this review is to discuss if triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol could be therapeutic targets to reduce cardiovascular risk. RECENT FINDINGS: Triglyceride measurement is not informative on the specificity of the triglyceride-rich lipoproteins present in the plasma because some of these are not atherogenic (chylomicrons, large VLDLs) while others are highly atherogenic (small VLDLs, remnants, IDL...). Statins, in addition to reducing LDL-cholesterol, significantly reduced atherogenic remnant lipoprotein cholesterol levels. 4S, CARE+LIPID, and AFCAPS/TexCAPS studies, suggested enhanced therapeutic potential of statins for improving triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels in patients with CHD. A fibrate (gemfibrozil) was shown to reduce death from CHD and non-fatal myocardial infarction in secondary prevention of CHD in men with low levels of HDL-cholesterol (VA-HIT); during the treatment these levels predicted the magnitude of reduction in risk for CHD events. SUMMARY: ATP III recommendations state, on triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol as targets to reduce cardiovascular risk: (1) that lowering LDL-cholesterol levels is the primary target of therapy, (2) a secondary target is to achieve a triglyceride level < 150 mg/dL and (3) clinical trial data are considered to be insufficient to support recommended a specific HDL-cholesterol goal even if HDL-cholesterol < 40 mg/dL is considered to be a major risk factor of CHD.     

Carbohydrate-induced hypertriglyceridemia: modifying factors and implications for cardiovascular risk.

High-carbohydrate/low-fat, isocaloric diets have repeatedly been shown to increase plasma triglyceride concentrations. The present review addresses recent developments relevant to several important unresolved issues. These include the type of dietary carbohydrate that is most likely to induce hypertriglyceridemia, predictors of individual susceptibility, modifiable physiologic factors that may mitigate the plasma triglyceride response, underlying metabolic mechanisms that are responsible for increased plasma triglycerides, and implications of altered serum lipid profiles for atherogenic risk. Although some progress has been made in this field, the central public health issue - the net effect on cardiovascular risk - remains unresolved.     

Fibrates, dyslipoproteinaemia and cardiovascular disease

Recent epidemiological data have reaffirmed that elevated plasma triglyceride and low HDL-cholesterol levels are important risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease. The rationale for the clinical use of fibric acid derivatives, which are designed to correct this metabolic nexus, is now on firmer ground. The mechanism of action of fibrates on lipoprotein metabolism has recently been elucidated at the molecular level and involves the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha 1 in the liver, with the net effect of improving the plasma transport rates of several lipoproteins. Other potential anti-atherothrombotic effects include the inhibition of coagulation and enhancement of fibrinolysis, as well as the inhibition of inflammatory mediators involved in atherogenesis. These consequences probably underpin the favourable effects of fibrates seen in recent angiographic and clinical trials. Two important clinical trials on the effect of gemfibrozil (Veterans Administration-HDL-Cholesterol Intervention Trial) and bezafibrate (Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention Study) have recently been completed in subjects with elevated triglyceride, low HDL and normal or near-normal LDL-cholesterol levels. The results testify to the efficacy of these agents in decreasing the incidence of cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with multiple risk factors and plasma triglyceride levels of over 2.2 mmol/l. The findings of these trials are compared with the statin-based Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study, with a recommendation that future studies in appropriately selected patients should examine the synergistic effect of the fibrate/statin combination. The absolute risk reduction in the incidence of coronary events in the Veterans Administration-HDL-Cholesterol Intervention Trial compares favourably with the statin trials. The therapeutic aspects of the efficacy and safety of fibrates are reviewed. Besides primary mixed hyperlipidaemias, particular indications for the clinical use of fibrates include type 2 diabetes, the metabolic syndrome and renal insufficiency. The St Mary's, Ealing, Northwick Park Diabetes Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Study has suggested that fibrates may decrease the incidence of coronary events in type 2 diabetes, but this hypothesis will be more extensively tested in the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study, Fenofibrate in Event Lowering in Diabetes Study and Lipids in Diabetes Study projects. Although significant new knowledge has accrued over the past few years concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of fibrates, the success of these agents in clinical practice depends on the availability of methods for assessing cardiovascular risk as well as on treatment guidelines, which as presently designed and recommended may be inaccurate and suboptimal.     

Aggressive lipid management for cardiovascular prevention: evidence from clinical trials

Epidemiologic evidence shows that elevated serum cholesterol, specifically low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), increases the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Moreover, large-scale intervention trials demonstrate that treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), the most effective drug class for lowering LDL-C, significantly reduces the risk of CHD events. Unfortunately, only a moderate percentage of hypercholesterolemic patients are achieving LDL-C targets specified by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), in part because clinicians are not effectively titrating medications as needed to achieve LDL-C goals. Recent evidence suggests that more aggressive LDL-C lowering may provide greater clinical benefit, even in individuals with moderately elevated serum cholesterol levels. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that statins have cardioprotective effects in many high-risk individuals, including those with baseline LDL-C <100 mg/dl. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was recognized by the NCEP-Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP II) as a negative risk factor for CHD. The NCEP-ATP III guidelines have also reaffirmed the importance of HDL-C by increasing the low HDL-C designation from <35 to <40 mg/dl as a major risk factor for CHD. Similarly, triglyceride control will play a larger role in dyslipidemia management. As more clinicians effectively treat adverse lipid and lipoprotein cardiovascular risk factors, patients will likely benefit from reductions in cardiovascular events.     

Which is the best lipid-modifying strategy in metabolic syndrome and diabetes: fibrates, statins or both?

Although less clinical intervention studies have been performed with fibrates than with statins, there are evidences indicating that fibrates may reduce risk of cardiovascular events. The potential clinical benefit of the fenofibrate will be specified by the ongoing Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, which rationale, methods and aims have been just published. Controlled clinical trials show similar or even greater cardiovascular benefits from statins-based therapy in patient subgroups with diabetes compared with overall study populations. Therefore, statins are the drug of first choice for aggressive lipid lowering actions and reducing risk of coronary artery disease in these patients. However, current therapeutic use of statins as monotherapy is still leaving many patients with mixed atherogenic dyslipidemia at high risk for coronary events. A combination statin/fibrate therapy may be often necessary to control all lipid abnormalities in patients with metabolic syndrome and diabetes adequately, since fibrates provide additional important benefits, particularly on triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels. Thus, this combined therapy concentrates on all the components of the mixed dyslipidemia that often occurs in persons with diabetes or metabolic syndrome, and may be expected to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Safety concerns about some fibrates such as gemfibrozil may lead to exaggerate precautions regarding fibrate administration and therefore diminish the use of the seagents. However, other fibrates, such as bezafibrate and fenofibrate appear to be safer and better tolerated. We believe that a proper co-administration of statins and fibrates, selected on basis of their safety, could be more effective in achieving a comprehensive lipid control as compared with monotherapy.     

The Insulin Resistance—Dyslipidemic Syndrome of Visceral Obesity: Effect on Patients' Risk

Coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus represent two highly prevalent conditions in affluent societies. Although a dyslipidemic state is frequently found in type 2 patients with obesity, studies have shown that the high triglyceride, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol dyslipidemia is also found in nondiabetic patients with insulin resistance. Studies that have used imaging techniques to assess the regional distribution of body fat have shown that an excess of visceral adipose tissue, that is, a high accumulation of fat in the abdominal cavity, was associated with a cluster of metabolic disturbances such as insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, hypertriglyceridemia, elevated apolipoprotein B (apoB) concentrations, small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, as well as low HDL cholesterol levels. Prospective studies such as the Quebec Cardiovascular Study have shown that this cluster of metabolic abnormalities commonly found in patients with excess visceral adipose tissue substantially increases the risk of CHD. The high prevalence of visceral obesity in sedentary adult men and postmenopausal women is such that it may represent the most prevalent cause of atherogenic dyslipidemic states associated with CHD in our population.     

Fibric acid derivatives in cardiovascular disease prevention: results from the large clinical trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Results from five large placebo-controlled trials with second-generation fibrates have shown varying success in reducing cardiovascular events. This review focuses on a number of extended analyses from these trials that may relate to the success or failure of fibrate therapy and indicate who might likely benefit from this therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Results have been far from uniform and several trials have been adversely impacted by high off-trial statin use. Collective evidence suggests, however, that fibrates have optimum cardiovascular benefit in diabetes or other manifestations of insulin resistance. Much of this evidence comes from posttrial analysis in subgroups with more sharply defined clinical characteristics than in the overall trial population. Analyses also suggest that different fibrates have a different range of favorable clinical properties, that the cardiovascular benefit of fibrates may not be readily measured or mostly predicted by changes in traditional lipid measurements, and that other nonlipid properties of fibrates as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agents might explain some of the benefit of these drugs. SUMMARY: Results of major clinical endpoint trials with fibrates, although not uniformly positive, provide substantial evidence for a selective therapeutic role of these drugs in cardiovascular event reduction in diabetes or insulin resistance.     

Apolipoprotein A5, a crucial determinant of plasma triglyceride levels,is highly responsive to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activators

The recently discovered APOA5 gene has been shown in humans and mice to be important in determining plasma triglyceride levels, a major cardiovascular disease risk factor. apoAV represents the first described apolipoprotein where overexpression lowers triglyceride levels. Since fibrates represent a commonly used therapy for lowering plasma triglycerides in humans, we investigated their ability to modulate APOA5 gene expression and consequently influence plasma triglyceride levels. Human primary hepatocytes treated with Wy 14,643 or fenofibrate displayed a strong induction of APOA5 mRNA. Deletion and mutagenesis analyses of the proximal APOA5 promoter firmly demonstrate the presence of a functional peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor response element. These findings demonstrate that APOA5 is a highly responsive peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha target gene and support its role as a major mediator for how fibrates reduce plasma triglycerides in humans.     

Hypertriglyceridemia and the fibrate trials

Epidemiological studies published since 1996 have established that hypertriglyceridemia can predict risk of cardiovascular disease in a manner statistically independent of HDL cholesterol. Nevertheless, the relationship of concentrations of plasma triglycerides to risk of cardiovascular disease remains less than straightforward, partly because triglycerides are carried in lipoproteins of different atherogenicity, partly because hypertriglyceridemia is associated with non-lipid atherogenic and thrombogenic processes. For example, the association of highest risk of cardiovascular disease to moderate rather than to severe hypertriglyceridemia can be understood in terms of the distribution of triglycerides between different classes of plasma lipoproteins. It is counter-intuitive to most clinicians, however, and hence it can result in the misdirection of clinical efforts including drug therapy.Fibrates lower plasma triglycerides, and raise HDL, efficiently and with few immediate side-effects. Central to their mode of action is activation of certain nuclear receptors in cells. There is no necessary connection, however, between that fascinating biochemistry and clinical benefit as defined by reductions in rates of death by coronary artery disease. A review of trials of cholesterol-lowering by diet and drugs, published between 1966 and 1996, included 12 trials of therapy with fibrates or placebo in more than 21000 patients. Overall, these trials indicated no benefit in terms of reduction in risk of coronary deaths. The period since 1996 has seen the publication of four additional trials of treatment of 6144 patients with fibrates or placebo. Two of them were major trials. The VA-HIT was very encouraging, because treatment with gemfibrozil produced a signficant reduction in the combined incidence of fatal and non-fatal coronary events. There was no significant reduction in coronary deaths, however. The results of BIP were frankly disappointing, because they demonstrated no significant effect of treatment with bezafibrate on either the primary end-point of the trial or on rates of coronary death.Clinical indications for the use of fibrates can obviously not be based on biochemical insights, however intriguing in their own right, but they have also not been satisfactorily defined by the randomized clinical trials published to date. Hope remains, however, that some clarification will result from ongoing trials of fibrate treatment of patients with type II diabetes.     

Molecular mechanism of action of the fibrates

Fibrates are old hypolipidemic drugs with pleitropic effects on lipid metabolism. Until, recently their intimate molecular mechanisms of action were mysterious. In the late 5 years, we have shown that the pharmacological effects of fibrates depend on their binding to "Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor alpha" (PPAR alpha). The binding of fibrates to PPAR alpha induces the activation or the inhibition of multiple genes involved in lipid metabolism through the binding of the activated PPAR alpha to "Peroxisome Proliferator Response Element" (PPRE) located in the gene promoters. Fibrates reduce plasma triglyceride levels by altering the expression of numerous genes coding for proteins involved in fatty acid metabolism (fatty acid transport protein, acyl-CoA synthetase, etc.) and also by increasing the lipoprotein lipase synthesis and decreasing the apolipoprotein C-III synthesis. Fibrates increase HDL cholesterol levels by increasing apolipoprotein A-I and apolipoprotein A-II synthesis. Furthermore, we recently demonstrated that fibrates are potent anti-inflammatory molecules through an indirect modulation of the nuclear-factor-kappa B activity. Therefore, we suggest that fibrates inhibit atherosclerosis development not only by improving the plasma lipid profile but also by reducing inflammation in the vascular wall.     

Hypertriglyceridemia secondary to obesity and diabetes

Hypertriglyceridemia is a common lipid abnormality in persons with visceral obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Hypertriglyceridemia typically occurs in conjunction with low HDL levels and atherogenic small dense LDL particles and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Insulin resistance is often an underlying feature and results in increased free fatty acid (FFA) delivery to the liver due to increased peripheral lipolysis. Increased hepatic VLDL production occurs due to increased substrate availability via FFAs, decreased apolipoprotein B100 degradation and increased lipogenesis. Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia also is a common feature of insulin resistance. Small dense LDL that coexist with decreased HDL particles in hypertriglyceridemic states are highly pro-atherogenic due to their enhanced endothelial permeability, proteoglycan binding abilities and susceptibility to oxidation. Hypertriglyceridemia also occurs in undertreated individuals with type 1 diabetes but intensive glucose control normalizes lipid abnormalities. However, development of visceral obesity in these patients unravels a similar metabolic profile as in patients with insulin resistance. Modest hypertriglyceridemia increases cardiovascular risk, while marked hypertriglyceridemia should be considered a risk for pancreatitis. Lifestyle modification is an important therapeutic strategy. Drug therapy is primarily focused on lowering LDL levels with statins, since efforts at triglyceride lowering and HDL raising with fibrates and/or niacin have not yet been shown to be beneficial in improving cardiovascular risk. Fibrates, however, are first-line agents when marked hypertriglyceridemia is present. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Triglyceride Metabolism and Disease.     

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in patients from Croatian Zagorje County treated at Department of Medicine, Zabok General Hospital from 2000 to 2006

The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients treated for coronary heart disease (CHD) at Department of Medicine, Zabok General Hospital during the 2000-2006 period. Cardiovascular diseases are a group of diseases that occur due to arterial. The risk factors that lead to the development and occurrence of cardiovascular disease are hypertension, cigarette smoking, hyperholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, diabetes mellitus and positive family history. Additional factors favoring the occurrence of cardiovascular disease include overweight, inadequate physical activity, and emotional stress. Data on all patients hospitalized and diagnosed with CHD at Department of Medicine, Zabok General Hospital during the 2000-2006 period were analyzed for the prevalence of risk factors for CHD, i.e. hypertension, cigarette smoking, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, diabetes mellitus and positive family history of cardiovascular disease. Hypercholesterolemia was defined by a cholesterol level higher than 5.1 mmol/L, hypertension from history data and blood pressure measurement on admission greater than 140/90 mmHg, diabetes mellitus from history data, and hypertriglyceridemia by a triglyceride level greater than 1.7 mmol/L. Information on heredity and cigarette smoking was collected from history and a questionnaire filled out on admission. All laboratory values were determined on patient admission to the hospital. Analysis of the risk factors for CHD recorded in patients from Zagorje County during the 2000-2006 period revealed hypertension to be the most common risk factor in our patients. According to sex, CHD was found to show a male preponderance. According to age at admission, CHD predominated in the > 70 age group, which accounted for one third of all patients, followed by a comparable proportion of the 50-60 and 60-70 age groups, i.e. still active population groups. As CHD is one of the leading health threats worldwide, estimated to remain so at least by 2020, it is fully justified to invest all efforts in the study of cardiovascular disease. New research projects should be focused on the prevention and early detection of the disease, improvement of diagnosis procedures, introduction of novel therapeutic options, use of new concepts, and due survey of the measures taken. CHD poses great socioeconomic burden upon every community in industrialized societies because of the ever younger age at onset. Actions should be taken to improve awareness of the CHD risks and morbidity in the population at large, stimulating favorable lifestyle and dietary modifications, and one's own health awareness, in order to upgrade the control of risk factors for and morbidity of cardiovascular disease.     

Avances en el tratamiento de la hipercolesterolemia

Numerous epidemiological and prospective studies have shown a direct relationship between total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular disease (cardiovascular morbidity and mortality). In many intervention studies with more than 100,000 subjects, statins have shown a powerful and significant reduction of cardiovascular events and a decrease in cardiovascular and overall mortality, far superior to those produced by any other lipid-lowering group.Consequently statins are considered to be safe and well tolerated and are the first choice in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and in cardiovascular disease prevention. If targets are not reached, other pharmacological groups must be associated (resins, nicotinic acid, ezetimibe, fibrates, etc.). Moreover, when hypercholesterolemia is associated with low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and high triglyceride levels, the association of statins with nicotinic acid, fibrates or omega-3 should be considered.Some questions remain to be answered: what LDL-C levels are desirable in secondary prevention? Which individuals might benefit from treatment in primary prevention? Which lipid-lowering drug is the most suitable to combine with statins and diminish cardiovascular risk in each situation? The present article reviews these important points.     

Advances in Lipid Testing and Management in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo review the pathophysiologic basis for the classic phenotype associated with diabetic dyslipidemia, discuss recent advances in lipid and lipoprotein testing for risk assessment and lipid therapy monitoring, and summarize a systematic approach to the clinical management of diabetic dyslipidemia.MethodsWe review the pertinent literature, including treatment guidelines and results of major clinical trials, and discuss the effectiveness of various pharmacologic interventions for management of lipid levels in patients with diabetes.ResultsThe incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus continue to escalate globally at alarming rates. Diabetes predisposes to multiple microvascular and macrovascular complications, including cardiovascular disease, the number 1 cause of mortality in the United States. The third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel in 2001 identified diabetes as a coronary heart disease (CHD) risk equivalent, in light of the evidence that CHD risk in persons with diabetes is similar to that of nondiabetic persons with established CHD. Diabetic dyslipidemia is characterized by a constellation of lipid derangements—hypertriglyceridemia, a low concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and a high concentration of small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles—that accelerate the progression of atherosclerotic disease and the development of atherothrombotic events.ConclusionStatin trials have demonstrated significant reductions in morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases, including in patients with diabetes. Nevertheless, many patients who achieve their LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) goal still have residual CHD risk. Diabetic dyslipidemia contributes to this residual risk because of the increased concentration of atherogenic apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins that can persist despite normalized LDL-C levels and low HDL-C levels. Recent clinical trials emphasize the importance of intensive lipid lowering to achieve recommended goals for LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:641-652)     

Cholesterol lowering and the vessel wall: new insights and future perspectives.

The basis for most acute coronary events is either rupture or fissuring of unstable atherosclerotic plaques with subsequent thrombosis leading to coronary artery occlusion. The development of atherosclerotic plaques takes several decades, but the mechanical features determining its stability and the risk of rupture can change very rapidly depending on a number of internal factors. Unstable plaques have a large lipid core, a thin overlying fibrous cap and an abundance of inflammatory cells. The most important factor determining the plaque stability is the plasma level of atherogenic LDL particles. Increased levels of these particles cause endothelial dysfunction with impaired vasodilatation capacity and prevalence of vasoconstriction, maintain inflammatory infiltration of the plaque, impair the strength of the fibrous cap and facilitate aggregation and coagulation. Effective lowering of plasma cholesterol by pharmacological and non-pharmacological means can revert most of these processes and increase the plaque's mechanical stability within several hours to days. Lipid lowering therapy can therefore decrease the risk of acute coronary events within a very short space of time. Thus a radical decrease in lipid levels, along with modification of other risk factors, may become the cornerstone for treatment of acute coronary syndromes, in addition to being an effective treatment in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD).     

Trans fatty acids: effects on cardiometabolic health and implications for policy

In both developed and developing countries, trans fatty acids (TFA) are largely consumed from partially hydrogenated vegetable oils. This article focuses on TFA as a modifiable dietary risk factor for cardiovascular disease, reviewing the evidence for lipid and non-lipid effects; the relations of trans fat intake with clinical endpoints; and current policy and legislative issues. In both observational cohort studies and randomized clinical trials, TFA adversely affect lipid profiles (including raising LDL and triglyceride levels, and reducing HDL levels), systemic inflammation, and endothelial function. More limited but growing evidence suggests that TFA also exacerbate visceral adiposity and insulin resistance. These potent effects of TFA on a multitude of cardiovascular risk factors are consistent with the strong associations seen in prospective cohort studies between TFA consumption and risk of myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease (CHD) death. The documented harmful effects of TFA along with the feasibility of substituting partially hydrogenated vegetable oils with healthy alternatives indicate little reason for continued presence of industrially produced TFA in food preparation and manufacturing or in home cooking fats/oils. A comprehensive strategy to eliminate the use of industrial TFA in both developed and developing countries, including education, food labeling, and policy and legislative initiatives, would likely prevent tens of thousands of CHD events worldwide each year.     

Effects of fenofibrate on lipid parameters in obese rhesus monkeys

Fenofibrate is a member of the fibrate class of hypolipidemic agents used clinically to treat hypertriglyceridemia and mixed hyperlipidemia. The fibrates were developed primarily on the basis of their cholesterol and triglyceride lowering in rodents. Fibrates have historically been ineffective at lowering triglycerides in experimentally-induced dyslipidemia in nonhuman primate models. The spontaneously obese rhesus monkey is a well-recognized animal model for the study of human obesity and type 2 diabetes, and many of these monkeys exhibit naturally occurring lipid abnormalities, including elevated triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), similar to patients with type 2 diabetes. To explore whether the obese rhesus model was predictive of the lipid lowering effects of fibrates, we evaluated fenofibrate in six hypertriglyceridemic, hyperinsulinemic, nondiabetic animals in a 20-week, dose-escalating study. The study consisted of a 4-week baseline period, two treatment periods of 10 mg/kg twice daily (b.i.d) for 4 weeks and 30 mg/kg b.i.d. for 8 weeks, and a 4-week washout period. Fenofibrate (30 mg/kg b.i.d) decreased serum triglycerides 55% and LDL-C 27%, whereas HDL-C increased 35%. Apolipoproteins B-100 and C-III levels were also reduced 70% and 29%, respectively. Food intake, body weight, and plasma glucose were not affected throughout the study. Interestingly, plasma insulin levels decreased 40% during the 30 mg/kg treatment period, suggesting improvement in insulin sensitivity. These results support the use of obese rhesus monkey as an excellent animal model for studying the effects of novel hypolipidemic agents, particularly agents that impact serum triglycerides and HDL-C.     

Fenofibrate therapy and cardiovascular protection in diabetes: recommendations after FIELD

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study was to provide valuable information on the ability of fibrates to reduce cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this review is to analyse results from FIELD and to see whether they may lead to modify the recommendations for treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia. RECENT FINDINGS: In FIELD, fenofibrate therapy was associated with a nonsignificant 11% reduction in the primary endpoint (coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction), corresponding to a significant 24% reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction (P = 0.010) and a nonsignificant 19% increase in CHD mortality. Fenofibrate reduced CHD events only in patients in primary prevention, but not in secondary prevention. Fenofibrate treatment was associated with less albuminuria progression and less retinopathy needing laser treatment. SUMMARY: FIELD's results are somewhat disappointing. The relatively low cardiovascular risk population from FIELD and the 'pollution' by statin therapy may not totally explain the weak results of fenofibrate in the reduction in CHD events. The significant increase in plasma homocysteine observed with fenofibrate could partly explain not only the higher number of venous thrombotic events, but also the poor effect of fenofibrate in reducing clinical outcomes, more particularly in patients with previous cardiovascular disease.     

Cardiovascular disease with diabetes or the metabolic syndrome: should statins or fibrates be first line lipid therapy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Subgroups with diabetes or with features of the metabolic syndrome have been increasingly highlighted in large clinical endpoint trials with lipid therapy. This review will focus on the results of trials with statins or fibrates and examine the strength of the evidence for major cardiovascular event reduction with each kind of therapy in these high-risk subgroups that typically have low-to-moderate levels of LDL cholesterol. RECENT FINDINGS: Of six statin trials in populations with moderately increased LDL cholesterol only one, the Heart Protection Study, has shown that statin therapy will significantly reduce the major coronary heart disease events of non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary heart disease death in diabetes. None of these trials has shown that statins have a particular predilection for reducing cardiovascular events in individuals with higher levels of body weight or other features of the metabolic syndrome. There are far fewer trial data with fibrates than with statins. However, the Veterans Affairs High Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial has shown that a fibrate can significantly reduce major cardiovascular events, most particularly coronary heart disease death, in those with diabetes as well as those without diabetes who have insulin resistance. Indeed, all fibrate trials show that this therapy appears to selectively benefit the individual with obesity and features of the metabolic syndrome. SUMMARY: Based principally on evidence from the Veterans Affairs High Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial and the cumulative experience with statins, trial data would thus far suggest that the patient with a modest increase in LDL cholesterol who has diabetes or features of the metabolic syndrome might be likely to achieve more substantial cardiovascular benefit from fibrate than from statin therapy.     

Serum levels of FGF-21 are increased in coronary heart disease patients and are independently associated with adverse lipid profile

Background

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) is a metabolic regulator with multiple beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism in animal models. The relationship between plasma levels of FGF-21 and coronary heart disease (CHD) in unknown.

Methodology/Principal Findings

This study aimed to investigate the correlation of serum FGF-21 levels and lipid metabolism in the patients with coronary heart disease. We performed a logistic regression analysis of the relation between serum levels of FGF-21 and CHD patients with and without diabetes and hypertension. This study was conducted in the Departments of Endocrinology and Cardiovascular Diseases at two University Hospitals. Participants consisted of one hundred and thirty-five patients who have been diagnosed to have CHD and sixty-one control subjects. Serum FGF-21 level and levels of fasting blood glucose; triglyceride; apolipoprotein B100; HOMA-IR; insulin; total cholesterol; HDL-cholesterol; LDL-cholesterol; and C-reactive protein were measured. We found that median serum FGF-21 levels were significantly higher in CHD than that of control subjects (P<0.0001). Serum FGF-21 levels in CHD patients with diabetes, hypertension, or both were higher than that of patients without these comorbidities. Serum FGF-21 levels correlated positively with triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, apolipoprotein B100, insulin and HOMA-IR but negatively with HDL-C and apolipoprotein A1 after adjusting for BMI, diabetes and hypertension. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that FGF-21 showed an independent association with triglyceride and apolipoprotein A1.

Conclusions/Significance

High levels of FGF-21 are associated with adverse lipid profiles in CHD patients. The paradoxical increase of serum FGF-21 in CHD patients may indicate a compensatory response or resistance to FGF-21.