Structural transition in chromatin induced by ions in solution

Structural transition in chromatin was measured as a function of counter ions in solution (NaCl or MgCl(2)) and of histones bound on the DNA. The addition of counter ions to aqueous solutions of chromatin, partially dehistonized chromatin, and DNA caused a drastic reduction in viscosity and a significant increase in sedimentation coefficient. Transitions occurred primarily at about 2 x 10(-3) M NaCl and 1 x 10(-5) M MgCl(2) and are interpreted as a change in structure of chromatin induced by tight binding of cations (Na(+) or Mg(++)) to DNA, either free or bound by histones, and is an intrinsic property of DNA rather than of the type of histone bound. At a given ionic condition, removal of histone H1 from chromatin had only a minor effect on the hydrodynamic properties of chromatin while removal of other histones caused a drastic change in these properties. An increase in the sedimentation coefficient of DNA was observed also for protamine. DNA complexes wherein the bound protein contains only unordered coil rather than the alpha-helices found in histones.     

Complete displacement of somatic histones during transformation of spermatid chromatin: a model experiment.

Displacement of histones from calf thymus chromatin has been studied in an attempt to postulate the mechanisms involved in the total removal of somatic-type histones during transformation of spermatid chromatin. When chromatin is saturated with protamine (protamine/DNA, 0.5), histone I becomes displaceable at 0.15-0.3 M NaCl, suggesting that direct replacement by highly basic sperm histone could be a mechanism for its removal. While histone I is the only histone which is extensively degraded upon incubation of chromatin and, therefore, proteolysis might provide an additional mechanism for the removal of this histone, acetylation of chromatin by acetic anhydride greatly increases suscpetibility of histones IIb1, IIb2, and III to the chromosomally associated protease. These histones are extensively degraded and displaced from the DNA upon incubation of the acetylated chromatin. Although histone IV is not appreciably degraded, the proteolytic removal of acetylated histone III from chromatin weakens the interaction of acetylated histone IV to the DNA, and this histone becomes dissociable at 0.3 M NaCl. A comparison of the extent of chemical acetylation of individual histones observed in this investigation with that of enzymatic acetylation which can be achieved in vivo suggests that acetylation and proteolysis could be a mechanism for the removal of histone IIb2 and III. The displacement of histones IIb1 and IV could be explained on the basis of decreased binding to DNA as a result of their acetylation together with the proteolytic removal of their respective partner histones, IIb2 and III.     

THE HISTONES ASSOCIATED WITH CONDENSED AND EXTENDED CHROMATIN OF MOUSE LIVER

Histones were extracted from isolated mouse liver nuclei, and from mouse liver condensed and extended chromatin. Mouse liver histones were found to be very similar to those of calf thymus in their solubility properties, relative electrophoretic mobilities, and molecular weights as determined on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Quantitative analysis by high-resolution gel electrophoresis demonstrated a remarkable similarity between the histones of condensed chromatin and those of extended chromatin. However, minor differences were found. A unique subspecies was found only in condensed chromatin histone and the relative amounts of fractions F2A1 and F2A2 differed in the two types of chromatin. The ratio of the parental to the acetylated form of F2A1 was identical in the two chromatin samples. Since DNA extracted from the condensed chromatin fraction consisted of approximately 50% satellite DNA, the general similarities between the histones of condensed and extended chromatin make it likely that even this simple, highly repetitive DNA is complexed with a number of histone subfractions.     

Polyoma Viral DNA Replicated as a Nucleoprotein Complex in Close Association with the Host Cell Chromatin

Polyoma viral DNA is shown to be replicated in close association with the mouse cell chromatin. Two virus-specific nucleoprotein complexes, designated complex A and B, can be dissociated from the isolated chromatin by gentle homogenization in 0.5 M NaCl. Complex A contains only replicating polyoma (Py) DNA whereas complex B contains only mature Py DNA I. The results show, furthermore, that complex A, containing viral DNA in different stages of replication, and complex B are both nucleoproteins with the same buoyant density. The data presently available suggest that newly synthesized stretches of Py DNA are immediately complexed with mouse cell histones and that complex B becomes the "core" of progeny Py virions. These results suggested that Py-induced replication of the mouse cell chromatin may be necessary to provide replicating Py DNA with histones.     

Laser-induced crosslinking of histones to DNA in chromatin and core particles: implications in studying histone-DNA interactions.

UV laser irradiation has been used to covalently crosslink histones to DNA in nuclei, chromatin and core particles and the presence of the different histone species in the covalently linked material was detected immunochemically. When nuclei were irradiated and then trypsinized to cleave the N- and C- terminal histone tails, no histones have been found covalently linked to DNA. This finding shows that UV laser-induced crosslinking of histones to DNA is accomplished via the non-structured domains only. This unexpected way of crosslinking operated in chromatin, H1-depleted chromatin and core particles, i.e. independently of the chromatin structure. The efficiency of crosslinking, however, showed such a dependence: whilst the yield of crosslinks was similar in total and H1-depleted chromatin, in core particles the efficiency was 3-4 times lower for H2A, H2B and H4 and 10-12 times lower for H3. The decreased crosslinking efficiency, especially dramatic in the case of H3, is attributed to a reduced number of binding sites, and, respectively, is considered as a direct evidence for interaction of nonstructured tails of core histones with linker DNA.     

Yeast nucleosomes allow thermal untwisting of DNA.

Thermal untwisting of DNA is suppressed in vitro in nucleosomes formed with chicken or monkey histones. In contrast, results obtained for the 2 micron plasmid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are consistent with only 30% of the DNA being constrained from thermal untwisting in vivo. In this paper, we examine thermal untwisting of several plasmids in yeast cells, nuclei, and nuclear extracts. All show the same quantitative degree of thermal untwisting, indicating that this phenomenon is independent of DNA sequence. Highly purified yeast plasmid chromatin also shows a large degree of thermal untwisting, whereas circular chromatin reconstituted using chicken histones is restrained from thermal untwisting in yeast nuclear extracts. Thus, the difference in thermal untwisting between yeast chromatin and that assembled with chicken histones is most likely due to differences in the constituent histone proteins.     

Histones and nucleosomes in Cancer sperm (Decapod: Crustacea) previously described as lacking basic DNA-associated proteins: a new model of sperm chromatin

To date several studies have been carried out which indicate that DNA of crustacean sperm is neither bound nor organized by basic proteins and, contrary to the rest of spermatozoa, do not contain highly packaged chromatin. Since this is the only known case of this type among metazoan cells, we have re-examined the composition, and partially the structure, of the mature sperm chromatin of Cancer pagurus, which has previously been described as lacking basic DNA-associated proteins. The results we present here show that: (a) sperm DNA of C. pagurus is bound by histones forming nucleosomes of 170 base pairs, (b) the ratio [histones/DNA] in sperm of two Cancer species is 0.5 and 0.6 (w/w). This ratio is quite lower than the proportion [proteins/DNA] that we found in other sperm nuclei with histones or protamines, whose value is from 1.0 to 1.2 (w/w), (c) histone H4 is highly acetylated in mature sperm chromatin of C. pagurus. Other histones (H3 and H2B) are also acetylated, though the level is much lower than that of histone H4. The low ratio of histones to DNA, along with the high level of acetylation of these proteins, explains the non-compact, decondensed state of the peculiar chromatin in the sperm studied here. In the final section we offer an explanation for the necessity of such decondensed chromatin during gamete fertilization of this species.     

The organization of histones and DNA in chromatin: Evidence for an arginine-rich histone kernel

We have examined the role played by various histones in the organization of the DNA of the nucleosome, using staphylococcal nuclease as a probe of DNA conformation. When this enzyme attacks chromatin, a series of fragments evenly spaced at 10 base pair intervals is generated, reflecting the histone-DNA interactions within the nucleosome structure. To determine what contribution the various histones make to DNA organization, we have studied the staphylococcal nuclease digestion patterns of complexes of DNA with purified histones.Virtually all possible combinations of homogeneous histones were reconstituted onto DNA. Exhaustive digestion of a complex containing the four histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 yields a DNA fragment pattern very similar to that of whole chromatin. The only other combinations of histones capable of inducing chromatin-like DNA organization are H2A/H2B/H4 and those mixtures containing both H3 and H4. From an examination of the kinetics of digestion of H3/H4 reconstitutes, we conclude that although the other histones have a role in DNA organization within the nucleosome, the arginine-rich histone pair, H3/H4, can organize DNA segments the length of the nucleosome core in the absence of all other histones.     

Structure and functions of linker histones

Linker histones such as variants H1, H5, and other similar proteins play an important role in regulation of chromatin structure and dynamics. However, interactions of linker histones with DNA and proteins, as well as specific functions of their different variants, are poorly studied. This is because they acquire tertiary structure only when interacting with a nucleosome, and because of limitations of currently available methods. However, deeper investigation of linker histones and their interactions with other proteins will address a number of important questions — from structure of compacted chromatin to regulation of early embryogenesis. In this review, structures of histone H1 variants and its interaction with chromatin DNA are considered. A possible functional significance of different H1 variants, a role of these proteins in maintaining interphase chromatin structure, and interactions of linker histones with other cellular proteins are also discussed.     

Chromatin replication,reconstitution and assembly

Many previously held concepts about the replication of chromatin have recently been revised, or seriously challenged. For instance, within the last two years, evidence has accumulated to indicate that newly synthesized DNA is not the sole site of deposition of newly synthesized histones, and that histones are not only made, but are assembled into chromatin in the absence of DNA synthesis. Furthermore, segregation of parental histones to daughter DNA duplexes may be bidirectional, rather than the previously accepted unidirectional mechanism. The storage of histones prior to assembly apparently involves histone pairs rather than octamers, and similarly, histones associate with DNA in (apparent) pairs, rather than as pre-assembled octameric units. It is currently questioned whether or not nucleoplasmin is involved in either histone storage or nucleosome assembly. The onset of histone synthesis has recently been found to occur in late G1 rather than in S, and thus is independent of DNA synthesis; however, the cessation of histone synthesis is linked to that of DNA. Thus, there emerges from this newly accumulated data the conclusion that chromatin biosynthesis is not as straightforward as was believed just a few years ago. As we review the evidence on each of these subjects, we attempt to point out directions for future experimentation.     

Interactions of acetylated histones with DNA as revealed by UV laser induced histone-DNA crosslinking

The interaction of acetylated histones with DNA in chromatin has been studied by UV laser-induced crosslinking histones to DNA. After irradiation of the nuclei, the covalently linked protein-DNA complexes were isolated and the presence of histones in them demonstrated immunochemically. When chromatin from irradiated nuclei was treated with clostripain, which selectively cleaved the N-terminal tails of core histones, no one of them was found covalently linked to DNA, thus showing that crosslinking proceeded solely via the N-terminal regions. However, the crosslinking ability of the laser was preserved both upon physiological acetylation of histones, known to be restricted to the N-terminal tails, and with chemically acetylated chromatin. This finding is direct evidence that the postsynthetic histone acetylation does not release the N-terminal tails from interaction with DNA.     

Exchange of histones H1, H2A, and H2B in vivo

We have asked whether histones synthesized in the absence of DNA synthesis can exchange into nucleosomal structures. DNA synthesis was inhibited by incubating hepatoma tissue culture cells in medium containing 5.0 mM hydroxyurea for 40 min. During the final 20 min, the cells were pulsed with [3H]lysine to radiolabel the histones (all five histones are substantially labeled under these conditions). By two electrophoretic techniques, we demonstrate that histones H1, H2A, and H2B synthesized in the presence of hydroxyurea do not merely associate with the surface of the chromatin but instead exchange with preexisting histones so that for the latter two histones there is incorporation into nucleosome structures. On the other hand, H3 and H4 synthesized during this same time period appear to be only weakly bound, if at all, to chromatin. These two histones have been isolated from postnuclear washes and purified. Some possible implications of in vivo exchange are discussed.     

Analysis of chromatin reconstitutiion.

The ability of high molecular weight chicken erythrocyte chromatin to spontaneously self-assemble into native-like material, after dissociation by high ionic strength and reassociation by salt gradient dialysis, was critically examined. The native conformational state of the reassembled nucleoprotein complex was regenerated to the extent reflected by circular dichroism spectra and thermally induced helix--coil transition of the nucleoprotein DNA. However, internucleosomal packing of approximately 205 base pairs of DNA per repeating unit, as probed by digestion with micrococcal nuclease, was not regenerated upon reassembly and was replaced by a packing of approximately 160 base pairs per repeating unit. Thus, high molecular weight chromatin containing only lysine-rich histones (H1 and H5) and core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) is not a true self-assembling system in vitro using the salt gradient dialysis system used herein. Circular dichroism and thermal denaturation studies on core chromatin (lysine-rich histones removed) showed that core histones alone are not capable of reassembling high molecular weight DNA into native-like core particles at low temperature (4 degree C). Reassembly at 21 degree C restored the circular dichroism but not the thermal denaturation properties to those characteristic of undissociated core chromatin. Nonetheless, micrococcal nuclease digestions of both reassembled core chromatin products were identical with undissociated native core chromatin. Ressembly in the presence of the complete complement of histones, followed by removal of the lysine-rich histones, did regenerate the thermal denaturation properties of undissociated native core particles. These results indicated multiple functions of the lysine-rich histones in the in vitro assembly of high molecular weight chromatin.     

Restoring chromatin after replication: How new and old histone marks come together

In dividing cells genome stability and function rely on faithful transmission of both DNA sequence and its organization into chromatin. In the course of DNA replication chromatin undergoes transient genome-wide disruption followed by restoration on new DNA. This involves tight coordination of DNA replication and chromatin assembly processes in time and space. Dynamic recycling and de novo deposition of histones are fundamental for chromatin restoration. Histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) are thought to have a causal role in establishing distinct chromatin structures. Here we discuss PTMs present on new and parental histones and how they influence genome stability and restoration of epigenetically defined domains. Newly deposited histones must change their signature in the process of chromatin restoration, this may occur in a step-wise fashion involving replication-coupled processes and information from recycled parental histones.     

Perturbation of chromatin structure in the region of the adult beta-globin gene in chicken erythrocyte chromatin

An EcoRI chromatin fragment containing the adult beta-globin gene and flanking sequences, isolated from chicken erythrocyte nuclei, sediments at a reduced rate relative to bulk chromatin fragments of the same size. We show that the specific retardation cannot be reversed by adding extra linker histones to native chromatin. When the chromatin fragments are unfolded either by removing linker histones or lowering the ionic strength, the difference between globin and bulk chromatin fragments is no longer seen. The refolded chromatin obtained by restoring the linker histones to the depleted chromatin, however, exhibits the original sedimentation difference. This difference is therefore due to a special property of the histone octamers on the active gene that determines the extent of its folding into higher-order structure. That it is not due to the differential binding of linker histones in vitro is shown by measurements of the protein to DNA ratios using CsCl density-gradients. Both before and after selective removal of the linker histones, the globin gene fragment and bulk chromatin fragments exhibit only a marginal difference in buoyant density. In addition, we show that cleavage of the EcoRI fragment by digestion at the 5' and 3' nuclease hypersensitive sites flanking the globin gene liberates a fragment from between these sites that sediments normally. We conclude that the hypersensitive sites per se are responsible for the reduction in sedimentation rate. The non-nucleosomal DNA segments appear to be too long to be incorporated into the chromatin solenoid and thus create spacers between separate solenoidal elements in the chromatin, which can account for its hydrodynamic behaviour.     

Modification of histone binding in calf thymus chromatin by protamine.

When calf thymus chromatin is incubated with protamine, the protein binds to DNA, forming a chromatin-protamine complex. The binding reaches a saturating level at the weight ratio of protamine to DNA of approximately 0.5. Although the saturated binding of protamine to DNA does not cause major displacement of histones from calf thymus chromatin, examination of the dissociation profiles by salt in combination with urea of protamine-treated chromatin shows that the histone-DNA interactions are markedly altered by such binding. The dissociation of histones from the chromatin-protamine complex requires less NaCl but the same concentration of urea as that for untreated chromatin, suggesting that the electorstatic interactions between the histones and DNA are decreased as a result of protamine binding. When protamine concentration is increased beyond that required for saturated binding to DNA during in vitro exposure of calf thymus chromatin to protamine, lysine-rich histone is completely displaced.