Defective downregulation of receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer

Most growth factors control cellular functions by activating specific receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). While overactivation of RTK signalling pathways is strongly associated with carcinogenesis, it is becoming increasingly clear that impaired deactivation of RTKs may also be a mechanism in cancer. A major deactivation pathway, receptor downregulation, involves ligand-induced endocytosis of the RTK and subsequent degradation in lysosomes. A complex molecular machinery that uses the small protein ubiquitin as a key regulator assures proper endocytosis and degradation of RTKs. Here we discuss evidence that implicates deregulation of this machinery in cancer.     

Regulators of endocytosis maintain localized receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in guided migration

Guidance receptors detect extracellular cues and instruct migrating cells how to orient in space. Border cells perform a directional invasive migration during Drosophila oogenesis and use two receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), EGFR and PVR (PDGF/VEGF Receptor), to read guidance cues. We find that spatial localization of RTK signaling within these migrating cells is actively controlled. Border cells lacking Cbl, an RTK-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase, have delocalized guidance signaling, resulting in severe migration defects. Absence of Sprint, a receptor-recruited, Ras-activated Rab5 guanine exchange factor, gives related defects. In contrast, increasing the level of RTK signaling by receptor overexpression or removing Hrs and thereby decreasing RTK degradation does not perturb migration. Cbl and Sprint both regulate early steps of RTK endocytosis. Thus, a physiological role of RTK endocytosis is to ensure localized intracellular response to guidance cues by stimulating spatial restriction of signaling.     

Physical–chemical principles underlying RTK activation,and their implications for human disease

RTKs, the second largest family of membrane receptors, exert control over cell proliferation, differentiation and migration. In recent years, our understanding of RTK structure and activation in health and disease has skyrocketed. Here we describe experimental approaches used to interrogate RTKs, and we review the quantitative biophysical frameworks and structural considerations that shape our understanding of RTK function. We discuss current knowledge about RTK interactions, focusing on the role of different domains in RTK homodimerization, and on the importance and challenges in RTK heterodimerization studies. We also review our understanding of pathogenic RTK mutations, and the underlying physical–chemical causes for the pathologies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein Folding in Membranes.     

Physical-chemical principles underlying RTK activation, and their implications for human disease

RTKs, the second largest family of membrane receptors, exert control over cell proliferation, differentiation and migration. In recent years, our understanding of RTK structure and activation in health and disease has skyrocketed. Here we describe experimental approaches used to interrogate RTKs, and we review the quantitative biophysical frameworks and structural considerations that shape our understanding of RTK function. We discuss current knowledge about RTK interactions, focusing on the role of different domains in RTK homodimerization, and on the importance and challenges in RTK heterodimerization studies. We also review our understanding of pathogenic RTK mutations, and the underlying physical-chemical causes for the pathologies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein Folding in Membranes.     

Profiling Y561-dependent and -independent substrates of CSF-1R in epithelial cells

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) activate multiple downstream cytosolic tyrosine kinases following ligand stimulation. SRC family kinases (SFKs), which are recruited to activated RTKs through SH2 domain interactions with RTK autophosphorylation sites, are targets of many subfamilies of RTKs. To date, there has not been a systematic analysis of the downstream substrates of such receptor-activated SFKs. Here, we conducted quantitative mass spectrometry utilizing stable isotope labeling (SILAC) analysis to profile candidate SRC-substrates induced by the CSF-1R tyrosine kinase by comparing the phosphotyrosine-containing peptides from cells expressing either CSF-1R or a mutant form of this RTK that is unable to bind to SFKs. This analysis identified previously uncharacterized changes in tyrosine phosphorylation induced by CSF-1R in mammary epithelial cells as well as a set of candidate substrates dependent on SRC recruitment to CSF-1R. Many of these candidates may be direct SRC targets as the amino acids flanking the phosphorylation sites in these proteins are similar to known SRC kinase phosphorylation motifs. The putative SRC-dependent proteins include known SRC substrates as well as previously unrecognized SRC targets. The collection of substrates includes proteins involved in multiple cellular processes including cell-cell adhesion, endocytosis, and signal transduction. Analyses of phosphoproteomic data from breast and lung cancer patient samples identified a subset of the SRC-dependent phosphorylation sites as being strongly correlated with SRC activation, which represent candidate markers of SRC activation downstream of receptor tyrosine kinases in human tumors. In summary, our data reveal quantitative site-specific changes in tyrosine phosphorylation induced by CSF-1R activation in epithelial cells and identify many candidate SRC-dependent substrates phosphorylated downstream of an RTK.     

Regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling by protein tyrosine phosphatases

Signaling through receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is a major mechanism for intercellular communication during development and in the adult organism, as well as in disease-associated processes. The phosphorylation status and signaling activity of RTKs is determined not only by the kinase activity of the RTK but also by the activities of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs). This review discusses recently identified PTPs that negatively regulate various RTKs and the role of PTP inhibition in ligand-induced RTK activation. The contributions of PTPs to ligand-independent RTK activation and to RTK inactivation by other classes of receptors are also surveyed. Continued investigation into the involvement of PTPs in RTK regulation is likely to unravel previously unrecognized layers of RTK control and to suggest novel strategies for interference with disease-associated RTK signaling.     

K-252a and staurosporine selectively block autophosphorylation of neurotrophin receptors and neurotrophin-mediated responses.

The same receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) can mediate strikingly different biological responses in a fibroblast as opposed to a neuron. We have compared the rapidly induced tyrosine phosphorylations mediated by various RTKs in both NIH3T3 fibroblasts and in the PC12 neuronal precursor cell line and found that each RTK induces a distinct pattern of protein tyrosine phosphorylations in the two cell types. These findings are consistent with a model in which various cell types present a given RTK with different menus of signal transduction components, allowing the same RTK to elicit fundamentally distinct biological responses. Although there are obvious overlaps in the tyrosine phosphorylations induced by different RTKs in the same cell, there are also clear differences. The attempt to dissect these differences revealed that the kinase inhibitors K-252a and staurosporine inhibit RTK autophosphorylation and thus the biological consequences of receptor/ligand interaction. These inhibitors displayed substantially greater specificity for a subset of RTKs (including the neurotrophin receptors) than for other RTKs and acted as remarkably selective blockers of neurotrophin action in both neuronal and nonneuronal cells. A potential therapeutic application for these inhibitors is discussed.     

Ubiquitin in trafficking: The network at work

Targeting of membrane proteins to their proper destination requires specific mechanisms. Protein cargos are included in vesicles that bud off a donor organelle and ultimately fuse with a target organelle, where the cargos are delivered. Endocytosis of transmembrane receptors (e.g., receptor tyrosine kinases, RTKs) follows a common scheme that consists of an internalization reaction and a delivery step, during which cargos are transferred to an endosomal station to be either directed to the lysosome for degradation or recycled back to the cell surface. At each stage along the endocytic route, short motifs within protein cargos and/or post-translational modifications regulate transmembrane receptor sorting. In recent years, studies have shown that ubiquitination acts as a signal for the internalization and sorting of plasma membrane proteins. Here, we present an overview of ubiquitin's role as a ‘signal’ for intracellular trafficking and give examples of the multifaced mechanisms of ubiquitin-regulated RTK endocytosis.     

Sprouty2 acts at the Cbl/CIN85 interface to inhibit epidermal growth factor receptor downregulation

The ubiquitin ligase Cbl mediates ubiquitination of activated receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and interacts with endocytic scaffold complexes, including CIN85/endophilins, to facilitate RTK endocytosis and degradation. Several mechanisms regulate the functions of Cbl to ensure the fine-tuning of RTK signalling and cellular homeostasis. One regulatory mechanism involves the binding of Cbl to Sprouty2, which sequesters Cbl away from activated epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs). Here, we show that Sprouty2 associates with CIN85 and acts at the interface between Cbl and CIN85 to inhibit EGFR downregulation. The CIN85 SH3 domains A and C bind specifically to proline-arginine motifs present in Sprouty2. Intact association between Sprouty2, Cbl and CIN85 is required for inhibition of EGFR endocytosis as well as EGF-induced differentiation of PC12 cells. Moreover, Sprouty4, which lacks CIN85-binding sites, does not inhibit EGFR downregulation, providing a molecular explanation for functional differences between Sprouty isoforms. Sprouty2 therefore acts as an inducible inhibitor of EGFR downregulation by targeting both the Cbl and CIN85 pathways.     

Suppressors of T-cell receptor signaling Sts-1 and Sts-2 bind to Cbl and inhibit endocytosis of receptor tyrosine kinases

The ubiquitin (Ub) ligase Cbl plays a critical role in attenuation of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling by inducing ubiquitination of RTKs and promoting their sorting for endosomal degradation. Herein, we describe the identification of two novel Cbl-interacting proteins, p70 and Clip4 (recently assigned the names Sts-1 and Sts-2, respectively), that inhibit endocytosis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. Sts-1 and Sts-2 contain SH3 domains that interacted with Cbl, Ub-associated domains, which bound directly to mono-Ub or to the EGFR/Ub chimera as well as phosphoglycerate mutase domains that mediated oligomerization of Sts-1/2. Ligand-induced recruitment of Sts-1/Sts-2 into activated EGFR complexes led to inhibition of receptor internalization, reduction in the number of EGFR-containing endocytic vesicles, and subsequent block of receptor degradation followed by prolonged activation of mitogenic signaling pathways. On the other hand, interference with Sts-1/Sts-2 functions diminished ligand-induced receptor degradation, cell proliferation, and oncogenic transformation in cultured fibroblasts. We suggest that Sts-1 and Sts-2 represent a novel class of Ub-binding proteins that regulate RTK endocytosis and control growth factor-induced cellular functions.     

RhoB links PDGF signaling to cell migration by coordinating activation and localization of Cdc42 and Rac

The small GTPase RhoB regulates endocytic trafficking of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and the non-receptor kinases Src and Akt. While receptor-mediated endocytosis is critical for signaling processes driving cell migration, mechanisms that coordinate endocytosis with the propagation of migratory signals remain relatively poorly understood. In this study, we show that RhoB is essential for activation and trafficking of the key migratory effectors Cdc42 and Rac in mediating the ability of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) to stimulate cell movement. Stimulation of the PDGF receptor-β on primary vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) results in RhoB-dependent trafficking of endosome-bound Cdc42 from the perinuclear region to the cell periphery, where the RhoGEF Vav2 and Rac are also recruited to drive formation of circular dorsal and peripheral ruffles necessary for cell migration. Our findings identify a novel RhoB-dependent endosomal trafficking pathway that integrates RTK endocytosis with Cdc42/Rac localization and cell movement.     

Receptor tyrosine kinase transmembrane domains

The transmembrane (TM) domains of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) play an active role in signaling. They contribute to the stability of full-length receptor dimers and to maintaining a signaling-competent dimeric receptor conformation. In an exciting new development, two structures of RTK TM domains have been solved, a break-through achievement in the field. Here we review these structures, and we discuss recent studies of RTK TM domain dimerization energetics, possible synergies between domains, and the effects of pathogenic RTK TM mutations on structure and dimerization.     

Cbl-family ubiquitin ligases and their recruitment of CIN85 are largely dispensable for epidermal growth factor receptor endocytosis

Members of the casitas B-lineage lymphoma (Cbl) family (Cbl, Cbl-b and Cbl-c) of ubiquitin ligases serve as negative regulators of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). An essential role of Cbl-family protein-dependent ubiquitination for efficient ligand-induced lysosomal targeting and degradation is now well-accepted. However, a more proximal role of Cbl and Cbl-b as adapters for CIN85-endophilin recruitment to mediate ligand-induced initial internalization of RTKs is supported by some studies but refuted by others. Overexpression and/or incomplete depletion of Cbl proteins in these studies is likely to have contributed to this dichotomy. To address the role of endogenous Cbl and Cbl-b in the internalization step of RTK endocytic traffic, we established Cbl/Cbl-b double-knockout (DKO) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and demonstrated that these cells lack the expression of both Cbl-family members as well as endophilin A, while they express CIN85. We show that ligand-induced ubiquitination of EGFR, as a prototype RTK, was abolished in DKO MEFs, and EGFR degradation was delayed. These traits were reversed by ectopic human Cbl expression. EGFR endocytosis, assessed using the internalization of ¹²⁵I-labeled or fluorescent EGF, or of EGFR itself, was largely retained in Cbl/Cbl-b DKO compared to wild type MEFs. EGFR internalization was also largely intact in Cbl/Cbl-b depleted MCF-10A human mammary epithelial cell line. Inducible shRNA-mediated knockdown of CIN85 in wild type or Cbl/Cbl-b DKO MEFs had no impact on EGFR internalization. Our findings, establish that, at physiological expression levels, Cbl, Cbl-b and CIN85 are largely dispensable for EGFR internalization. Our results support the model that Cbl–CIN85–endophilin complex is not required for efficient internalization of EGFR, a prototype RTK.     

Receptor tyrosine kinases and their activation in melanoma

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and their downstream signalling pathways have long been hypothesized to play key roles in melanoma development. A decade ago, evidence was derived largely from animal models, RTK expression studies and detection of activated RAS isoforms in a small fraction of melanomas. Predictions that overexpression of specific RTKs implied increased kinase activity and that some RTKs would show activating mutations in melanoma were largely untested. However, technological advances including rapid gene sequencing, siRNA methods and phospho-RTK arrays now give a more complete picture. Mutated forms of RTK genes including KIT, ERBB4, the EPH and FGFR families and others are known in melanoma. Additional over- or underexpressed RTKs and also protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) have been reported, and activities measured. Complex interactions between RTKs and PTPs are implicated in the abnormal signalling driving aberrant growth and survival in malignant melanocytes, and indeed in normal melanocytic signalling including the response to ultraviolet radiation. Kinases are considered druggable targets, so characterization of global RTK activity in melanoma should assist the rational development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for clinical use.     

Effects of Membrane Trafficking on Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

The intracellular trafficking machinery contributes to the spatial and temporal control of signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). The primary role in this process is played by endocytic trafficking, which regulates the localization of RTKs and their downstream effectors, as well as the duration and the extent of their activity. The key regulatory points along the endocytic pathway are internalization of RTKs from the plasma membrane, their sorting to degradation or recycling, and their residence in various endosomal compartments. Here I will review factors and mechanisms that modulate RTK signaling by (1) affecting receptor internalization, (2) regulating the balance between degradation and recycling of RTK, and (3) compartmentalization of signals in endosomes and other organelles. Cumulatively, these mechanisms illustrate a multilayered control of RTK signaling exerted by the trafficking machinery.At the cellular level, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) need to be properly localized to function as signal-receiving and signal-transmitting devices (Lemmon and Schlessinger 2010). To receive signals (i.e., to bind extracellular ligands), RTKs have to be exposed at the surface of the plasma membrane. To transmit signals after ligand binding by RTKs, appropriate signaling components have to be available within intracellular compartments: in the cytoplasm, in association with membrane-bound organelles and in the cell nucleus. Importantly, the intracellular distribution of RTKs and their associated partners is not static but undergoes dynamic changes in different phases of signaling, as reflected for example by endocytic internalization of activated RTKs (Scita and Di Fiore 2010). Therefore, to function properly, the whole RTK signaling machinery within the cell has to be organized and tightly controlled both in space and in time. This organization and control are ensured by intracellular trafficking machineries, mainly by membrane transport systems such as endocytosis and secretion but also by other distribution systems (e.g., responsible for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of proteins).Recent years have brought increasing evidence that intracellular membrane trafficking, in particular endocytic internalization, degradation, and recycling, can profoundly affect the signaling properties of RTKs (Mukherjee et al. 2006; Abella and Park 2009; Lemmon and Schlessinger 2010; Scita and Di Fiore 2010; Grecco et al. 2011; Sigismund et al. 2012). The changes in the amounts of RTKs at the cell surface can alter the cellular responses when ligands are abundant (Grecco et al. 2011). In turn, the presence of a given RTK at the plasma membrane is determined by the rates of three trafficking processes: delivery of newly synthesized molecules by the secretory pathway, their internalization (occurring for both ligand-bound and ligand-free molecules), and endocytic recycling. Although the molecular details concerning the regulation of RTK delivery to the plasma membrane are not well known, numerous studies document various mechanisms by which internalization and recycling of RTKs can be modulated, thus affecting the signaling outputs (Le Roy and Wrana 2005). In addition to the regulation of RTKs at the cell surface, trafficking processes control the intracellular fate of endocytosed RTKs. Following internalization, RTKs can be either targeted for lysosomal degradation, or recycled back to the plasma membrane (Mukherjee et al. 2006; Abella and Park 2009; Scita and Di Fiore 2010). The first route results in the termination of signaling, whereas the second allows for sustained signaling if the ligand is available. Usually degradation and recycling of a given RTK can occur simultaneously but the balance between them is crucial to determine the net signaling output. Again, the molecular mechanisms that can shift the fate of internalized RTKs between degradation and recycling, thus changing RTK signaling, have begun to emerge in recent years (Polo and Di Fiore 2006; von Zastrow and Sorkin 2007; Sorkin and von Zastrow 2009; Sigismund et al. 2012). Finally, in contrast to an early view that only RTKs present at the plasma membrane are signaling competent, it is now accepted that in many cases activated RTKs can emit signals also after internalization into intracellular compartments (Miaczynska et al. 2004b; Miaczynska and Bar-Sagi 2010; Platta and Stenmark 2011). In some cell types (e.g., in neurons), such “signaling endosomes” are crucial for signal propagation within the cell and for the final cellular response. Moreover, endosomes can serve as platforms for amplification and compartmentalization of signals emitted by RTKs (Sadowski et al. 2009; Platta and Stenmark 2011).In this article, I will review factors and mechanisms that modulate RTK signaling by (1) affecting receptor internalization, (2) regulating the balance between degradation and recycling of RTK, and (3) compartmentalization of signals in endosomes and other organelles. As the membrane trafficking system of a cell is highly interconnected and can be considered a global dynamic continuum, it is important to note that often one primary alteration at a given stage of RTK trafficking may affect other transport steps or compartments, thus causing generalized changes in the intracellular routing and signaling of RTKs.     

Alternative dimerization of receptor tyrosine kinases with signal transduction through a cellular membrane

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) occupy a separate functional niche among membrane receptors, which is determined by the special features of mechanisms of the signal transduction through a cellular membrane. RTKs are involved in the regulation of development and homeostasis of all the tissues of a human organism, playing a central role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and adhesion. A necessary condition of the biochemical signal transduction through a plasmatic membrane is a ligand-dependent or a ligand-independent dimerization (and/or an oligomerization) of RTKs which is accompanied by conformational rearrangements of all the RTK domains, including the α-helical transmembrane segments. In this review, the main aspects of structure-function relationship for RTKs from various receptor subfamilies are briefly discussed. It is shown in the light of the recently obtained biophysical and biochemical data that functioning of RTK receptors is mediated not only by protein–protein interactions, but by the state of the lipid environment as one of the main components of a self-consistent signal transduction system as well. The new principles of intercellular signal transduction through a membrane replenish the molecular mechanisms of the RTK functioning that have been earlier proposed and explain a number of paradoxes which are observed upon activation of wild-type receptors and the receptors with pathogenic transmembrane mutations. Understanding of the complex mechanisms of the signaling processes can facilitate the successful search for new opportunities of influence on the RTK biological functions with potential therapeutic consequences.     

Physical and functional interactome atlas of human receptor tyrosine kinases

Much cell‐to‐cell communication is facilitated by cell surface receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). These proteins phosphorylate their downstream cytoplasmic substrates in response to stimuli such as growth factors. Despite their central roles, the functions of many RTKs are still poorly understood. To resolve the lack of systematic knowledge, we apply three complementary methods to map the molecular context and substrate profiles of RTKs. We use affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP‐MS) to characterize stable binding partners and RTK–protein complexes, proximity‐dependent biotin identification (BioID) to identify transient and proximal interactions, and an in vitro kinase assay to identify RTK substrates. To identify how kinase interactions depend on kinase activity, we also use kinase‐deficient mutants. Our data represent a comprehensive, systemic mapping of RTK interactions and substrates. This resource adds information regarding well‐studied RTKs, offers insights into the functions of less well‐studied RTKs, and highlights RTK‐RTK interactions and shared signaling pathways.