Kinetic characterization of the chemical steps involved in the catalytic mechanism of methionine sulfoxide reductase A from Neisseria meningitidis

Oxidation of methionine into methionine sulfoxide is associated with many pathologies and is described to exert regulatory effects on protein functions. Two classes of methionine sulfoxide reductases, called MsrA and MsrB, have been described to reduce the S and the R isomers of the sulfoxide of methionine sulfoxide back to methionine, respectively. Although MsrAs and MsrBs display quite different x-ray structures, they share a similar, new catalytic mechanism that proceeds via the sulfenic acid chemistry and that includes at least three chemical steps with 1) the formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate and the concomitant release of methionine; 2) the formation of an intra-disulfide bond; and 3) the reduction of the disulfide bond by thioredoxin. In the present study, it is shown that for the Neisseria meningitidis MsrA, 1) the rate-limiting step is associated with the reduction of the Cys-51/Cys-198 disulfide MsrA bond by thioredoxin; 2) the formation of the sulfenic acid intermediate is very efficient, thus suggesting catalytic assistance via amino acids of the active site; 3) the rate-determining step in the formation of the Cys-51/Cys-198 disulfide bond is that leading to the formation of the sulfenic intermediate on Cys-51; and 4) the apparent affinity constant for methionine sulfoxide in the methionine sulfoxide reductase step is 80-fold higher than the Km value determined under steady-state conditions.     

Characterization of the methionine sulfoxide reductase activities of PILB, a probable virulence factor from Neisseria meningitidis.

PILB has been described as being involved in the virulence of bacteria of Neisseria genus. The PILB protein is composed of three subdomains. In the present study, the central subdomain (PILB-MsrA), the C terminus subdomain (PILB-MsrB), and the fused subdomain (PILB-MsrA/MsrB) of N. meningitidis were produced as folded entities. The central subdomain shows a methionine sulfoxide reductase A (MsrA) activity, whereas PILB-MsrB displays a methionine sulfoxide reductase B (MsrB) activity. The catalytic mechanism of PILB-MsrB can be divided into two steps: 1) an attack of the Cys-494 on the sulfur atom of the sulfoxide substrate, leading to formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate and release of 1 mol of methionine/mol of enzyme and 2) a regeneration of Cys-494 via formation of an intradisulfide bond with Cys-439 followed by reduction with thioredoxin. The study also shows that 1) MsrA and MsrB display opposite stereoselectivities toward the sulfoxide function; 2) the active sites of both Msrs, particularly MsrB, are rather adapted for binding protein-bound MetSO more efficiently than free MetSO; 3) the carbon Calpha is not a determining factor for efficient binding to both Msrs; and 4) the presence of the sulfoxide function is a prerequisite for binding to Msrs. The fact that the two Msrs exhibit opposite stereoselectivities argues for a structure of the active site of MsrBs different from that of MsrAs. This is further supported by the absence of sequence homology between the two Msrs in particular around the cysteine that is involved in formation of the sulfenic acid derivative. The fact that the catalytic mechanism takes place through formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate for both Msrs supports the idea that sulfenic acid chemistry is a general feature in the reduction of sulfoxides by thiols.     

The enzymology and biochemistry of methionine sulfoxide reductases

The methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) family is composed of two structurally unrelated classes of monomeric enzymes named MsrA and MsrB, which display opposite stereo-selectivities towards the sulfoxide function. MsrAs and MsrBs, characterized so far, share the same chemical mechanism implying sulfenic acid chemistry. The mechanism includes three steps with (1) formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate with a concomitant release of 1 mol of methionine per mol of enzyme; (2) formation of an intramonomeric disulfide Msr bond followed by; (3) reduction of the oxidized Msr by thioredoxin (Trx). This scheme is in accordance with the kinetic mechanism of both Msrs which is of ping-pong type. For both Msrs, the reductase step is rate-determining in the process leading to the formation of the disulfide bond. The overall rate-limiting step takes place within the thioredoxin-recycling process, likely being associated with oxidized thioredoxin release. The kinetic data support structural recognition between oxidized Msr and reduced thioredoxin. The active sites of both Msrs are adapted for binding protein-bound methionine sulfoxide (MetSO) more efficiently than free MetSO. About 50% of the MsrBs binds a zinc atom, the location of which is in an opposite direction from the active site. Introducing or removing the zinc binding site modulates the catalytic efficiency of MsrB.     

Functional and structural aspects of poplar cytosolic and plastidial type a methionine sulfoxide reductases

The genome of Populus trichocarpa contains five methionine sulfoxide reductase A genes. Here, both cytosolic (cMsrA) and plastidial (pMsrA) poplar MsrAs were analyzed. The two recombinant enzymes are active in the reduction of methionine sulfoxide with either dithiothreitol or poplar thioredoxin as a reductant. In both enzymes, five cysteines, at positions 46, 81, 100, 196, and 202, are conserved. Biochemical and enzymatic analyses of the cysteine-mutated MsrAs support a catalytic mechanism involving three cysteines at positions 46, 196, and 202. Cys(46) is the catalytic cysteine, and the two C-terminal cysteines, Cys(196) and Cys(202), are implicated in the thioredoxin-dependent recycling mechanism. Inspection of the pMsrA x-ray three-dimensional structure, which has been determined in this study, strongly suggests that contrary to bacterial and Bos taurus MsrAs, which also contain three essential Cys, the last C-terminal Cys(202), but not Cys(196), is the first recycling cysteine that forms a disulfide bond with the catalytic Cys(46). Then Cys(202) forms a disulfide bond with the second recycling cysteine Cys(196) that is preferentially reduced by thioredoxin. In agreement with this assumption, Cys(202) is located closer to Cys(46) compared with Cys(196) and is included in a (202)CYG(204) signature specific for most plant MsrAs. The tyrosine residue corresponds to the one described to be involved in substrate binding in bacterial and B. taurus MsrAs. In these MsrAs, the tyrosine residue belongs to a similar signature as found in plant MsrAs but with the first C-terminal cysteine instead of the last C-terminal cysteine.     

Kinetic characterization of the catalytic mechanism of methionine sulfoxide reductase B from Neisseria meningitidis

Methionine sulfoxide reductases catalyze the thioredoxin-dependent reduction of methionine sulfoxide back to methionine. The methionine sulfoxide reductases family is composed of two structurally unrelated classes of enzymes named MsrA and MsrB, which display opposite stereoselectivities toward the sulfoxide function. Both enzymes are monomeric and share a similar three-step chemical mechanism. First, in the reductase step, a sulfenic acid intermediate is formed with a concomitant release of 1 mol of methionine per mol of enzyme. Then, an intradisulfide bond is formed. Finally, Msrs return back to reduced forms via reduction by thioredoxin. In the present study, it is shown for the Neisseria meningitidis MsrB that (1) the reductase step is rate-determining in the process leading to formation of the disulfide bond and (2) the thioredoxin-recycling process is rate-limiting. Moreover, the data suggest that within the thioredoxin-recycling process, the rate-limiting step takes place after the two-electron chemical exchange and thus is associated with the release of oxidized thioredoxin.     

A structural analysis of the catalytic mechanism of methionine sulfoxide reductase A from Neisseria meningitidis

The methionine sulfoxide reductases (Msrs) are thioredoxin-dependent oxidoreductases that catalyse the reduction of the sulfoxide function of the oxidized methionine residues. These enzymes have been shown to regulate the life span of a wide range of microbial and animal species and to play the role of physiological virulence determinant of some bacterial pathogens. Two structurally unrelated classes of Msrs exist, MsrA and MsrB, with opposite stereoselectivity towards the R and S isomers of the sulfoxide function, respectively. Both Msrs share a similar three-step chemical mechanism including (1) the formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate on the catalytic Cys with the concomitant release of the product—methionine, (2) the formation of an intramonomeric disulfide bridge between the catalytic and the regenerating Cys and (3) the reduction of the disulfide bridge by thioredoxin or its homologues. In this study, four structures of the MsrA domain of the PilB protein from Neisseria meningitidis, representative of four catalytic intermediates of the MsrA catalytic cycle, were determined by X-ray crystallography: the free reduced form, the Michaelis-like complex, the sulfenic acid intermediate and the disulfide oxidized forms. They reveal a conserved overall structure up to the formation of the sulfenic acid intermediate, while a large conformational switch is observed in the oxidized form. The results are discussed in relation to those proposed from enzymatic, NMR and theoretical chemistry studies. In particular, the substrate specificity and binding, the catalytic scenario of the reductase step and the relevance and role of the large conformational change observed in the oxidized form are discussed.     

Tandem use of selenocysteine: adaptation of a selenoprotein glutaredoxin for reduction of selenoprotein methionine sulfoxide reductase

Several engineered selenocysteine (Sec)-containing glutaredoxins (Grxs) and their enzymatic properties have been reported, but natural selenoprotein Grxs have not been previously characterized. We expressed a bacterial selenoprotein Grx from Clostridium sp. (also known as Alkaliphilus oremlandii) OhILAs in Escherichia coli and characterized this selenoenzyme and its natural Cys homologues in Clostridium and E. coli. The selenoprotein Grx had a 200-fold higher activity than its Sec-to-Cys mutant form, suggesting that Sec is essential for catalysis by this thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase. Kinetic analysis also showed that the selenoprotein Grx had a 10-fold lower K(m) than Cys homologues. Interestingly, this selenoenzyme efficiently reduced a Clostridium selenoprotein methionine sulfoxide reductase A (MsrA), suggesting that it is the natural reductant for the protein that is not reducible by thioredoxin, a common reductant for Cys-containing MsrAs. We also found that the selenoprotein Grx could not efficiently reduce a Cys version of Clostridium MsrA, whereas natural Clostridium and E. coli Cys-containing Grxs, which efficiently reduce Cys-containing MsrAs, poorly acted on the selenoprotein MsrA. This specificity for MsrA reduction could explain why Sec is utilized in Clostridium Grx and more generally provides a novel example of the use of Sec in biological systems.     

Glutaredoxin serves as a reductant for methionine sulfoxide reductases with or without resolving cysteine

Methionine sulfoxide reductases A and B (MsrA and MsrB) have been known to be thioredoxin (Trx)-dependent enzymes that catalyze the reduction of methionine sulfoxide in a stereospecific manner. This work reports that glutaredoxin, another major thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase, can serve as a reductant for both MsrA and MsrB. Glutaredoxins efficiently reduced 1-Cys MsrA lacking a resolving Cys, which is not reducible by Trx. Glutaredoxins also reduced 3-Cys MsrA containing two resolving Cys. The glutaredoxin-dependent activity of the 3-Cys MsrA was comparable with the Trx-dependent activity. The kinetic data suggest that 1-Cys MsrA is more efficiently reduced by glutaredoxin than 3-Cys form. Also, glutaredoxins could function as a reductant for 1-Cys MsrB lacking a resolving Cys as previously reported. In contrast to the previous report, 2-Cys MsrB containing a resolving Cys was reducible by the glutaredoxins. Collectively, this study demonstrates that glutaredoxins reduce MsrAs and MsrBs with or without resolving Cys.     

Methionine sulfoxide reductase: Chemistry,substrate binding,recycling process and oxidase activity

Three classes of methionine sulfoxide reductases are known: MsrA and MsrB which are implicated stereo-selectively in the repair of protein oxidized on their methionine residues; and fRMsr, discovered more recently, which binds and reduces selectively free L-Met-R-O. It is now well established that the chemical mechanism of the reductase step passes through formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate. The oxidized catalytic cysteine can then be recycled by either Trx when a recycling cysteine is operative or a reductant like glutathione in the absence of recycling cysteine which is the case for 30% of the MsrBs. Recently, it was shown that a subclass of MsrAs with two recycling cysteines displays an oxidase activity. This reverse activity needs the accumulation of the sulfenic acid intermediate. The present review focuses on recent insights into the catalytic mechanism of action of the Msrs based on kinetic studies, theoretical chemistry investigations and new structural data. Major attention is placed on how the sulfenic acid intermediate can be formed and the oxidized catalytic cysteine returns back to its reduced form.     

Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the reduced form and an oxidized form of E. coli methionine sulfoxide reductase A (MsrA): structural insight of the MsrA catalytic cycle

Methionine sulfoxide reductases (Msr) reduce methionine sulfoxide (MetSO)-containing proteins, back to methionine (Met). MsrAs are stereospecific for the S epimer whereas MsrBs reduce the R epimer of MetSO. Although structurally unrelated, the Msrs characterized so far display a similar catalytic mechanism with formation of a sulfenic intermediate on the catalytic cysteine and a concomitant release of Met, followed by formation of at least one intramolecular disulfide bond (between the catalytic and a recycling cysteine), which is then reduced by thioredoxin. In the case of the MsrA from Escherichia coli, two disulfide bonds are formed, i.e. first between the catalytic Cys51 and the recycling Cys198 and then between Cys198 and the second recycling Cys206. Three crystal structures including E. coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis MsrAs, which, for the latter, possesses only the unique recycling Cys198, have been solved so far. In these structures, the distances between the cysteine residues involved in the catalytic mechanism are too large to allow formation of the intramolecular disulfide bonds. Here structural and dynamical NMR studies of the reduced wild-type and the oxidized (Cys51-Cys198) forms of C86S/C206S MsrA from E. coli have been carried out. The mapping of MetSO substrate-bound C51A MsrA has also been performed. The data support (1) a conformational switch occurring subsequently to sulfenic acid formation and/or Met release that would be a prerequisite to form the Cys51-Cys198 bond and, (2) a high mobility of the C-terminal part of the Cys51-Cys198 oxidized form that would favor formation of the second Cys198-Cys206 disulfide bond.     

A sulfenic acid enzyme intermediate is involved in the catalytic mechanism of peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase from Escherichia coli

Methionine oxidation into methionine sulfoxide is known to be involved in many pathologies and to exert regulatory effects on proteins. This oxidation can be reversed by a ubiquitous monomeric enzyme, the peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase (MsrA), whose activity in vivo requires the thioredoxin-regenerating system. The proposed chemical mechanism of Escherichia coli MsrA involves three Cys residues (positions 51, 198, and 206). A fourth Cys (position 86) is not important for catalysis. In the absence of a reducing system, 2 mol of methionine are formed per mole of enzyme for wild type and Cys-86 --> Ser mutant MsrA, whereas only 1 mol is formed for mutants in which either Cys-198 or Cys-206 is mutated. Reduction of methionine sulfoxide is shown to proceed through the formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate. This intermediate has been characterized by chemical probes and mass spectrometry analyses. Together, the results support a three-step chemical mechanism in vivo: 1) Cys-51 attacks the sulfur atom of the sulfoxide substrate leading, via a rearrangement, to the formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate on Cys-51 and release of 1 mol of methionine/mol of enzyme; 2) the sulfenic acid is then reduced via a double displacement mechanism involving formation of a disulfide bond between Cys-51 and Cys-198, followed by formation of a disulfide bond between Cys-198 and Cys-206, which liberates Cys-51, and 3) the disulfide bond between Cys-198 and Cys-206 is reduced by thioredoxin-dependent recycling system process.     

Characterization of the amino acids involved in substrate specificity of methionine sulfoxide reductase A

Methionine sulfoxide reductases (Msrs) are ubiquitous enzymes that catalyze the thioredoxin-dependent reduction of methionine sulfoxide (MetSO) back to methionine. In vivo, Msrs are essential in protecting cells against oxidative damages on proteins and in the virulence of some bacteria. There exists two structurally unrelated classes of Msrs. MsrAs are stereo-specific toward the S epimer on the sulfur of the sulfoxide, whereas MsrBs are specific toward the R isomer. Both classes of Msrs display a similar catalytic mechanism of sulfoxide reduction by thiols via the sulfenic acid chemistry and a better affinity for protein-bound MetSO than for free MetSO. Recently, the role of the amino acids implicated in the catalysis of the reductase step of Neisseria meningitidis MsrA was determined. In the present study, the invariant amino acids potentially involved in substrate binding, i.e. Phe-52, Trp-53, Asp-129, His-186, Tyr-189, and Tyr-197, were substituted. The catalytic parameters under steady-state conditions and of the reductase step of the mutated MsrAs were determined and compared with those of the wild type. Altogether, the results support the presence of at least two binding subsites. The first one, whose contribution is major in the efficiency of the reductase step and in which the epsilon-methyl group of MetSO binds, is the hydrophobic pocket formed by Phe-52 and Trp-53, the position of the indole ring being stabilized by interactions with His-186 and Tyr-189. The second subsite composed of Asp-129 and Tyr-197 contributes to the binding of the main chain of the substrate but to a lesser extent.     

The mirrored methionine sulfoxide reductases of Neisseria gonorrhoeae pilB

Methionine sulfoxide reductases (Msr) protect against oxidative damage that can contribute to cell death. The tandem Msr domains (MsrA and MsrB) of the pilB protein from Neisseria gonorrhoeae each reduce different epimeric forms of methionine sulfoxide. The overall fold of the MsrB domain revealed by the 1.85 A crystal structure shows no resemblance to the previously determined MsrA structures from other organisms. Despite the lack of homology, the active sites show approximate mirror symmetry. In each case, conserved amino acid motifs mediate the stereo-specific recognition and reduction of the substrate. Unlike the MsrA domain, the MsrB domain activates the cysteine or selenocysteine nucleophile through a unique Cys-Arg-Asp/Glu catalytic triad. The collapse of the reaction intermediate most likely results in the formation of a sulfenic or selenenic acid moiety. Regeneration of the active site occurs through a series of thiol-disulfide exchange steps involving another active site Cys residue and thioredoxin. These observations have broad implications for modular catalysis, antibiotic drug design and continuing longevity studies in mammals.     

Reaction mechanism,evolutionary analysis,and role of zinc in Drosophila methionine-R-sulfoxide reductase

Methionine residues in proteins are susceptible to oxidation, and the resulting methionine sulfoxides can be reduced back to methionines by methionine-S-sulfoxide reductase (MsrA) and methionine-R-sulfoxide reductase (MsrB). Herein, we have identified two MsrB families that differ by the presence of zinc. Evolutionary analyses suggested that the zinc-containing MsrB proteins are prototype enzymes and that the metal was lost in certain MsrB proteins later in evolution. Zinc-containing Drosophila MsrB was further characterized. The enzyme was found to employ a catalytic Cys(124) thiolate, which directly interacted with methionine sulfoxide, resulting in methionine and a Cys(124) sulfenic acid intermediate. A subsequent reaction of this intermediate with Cys(69) generated an intramolecular disulfide. Dithiothreitol could reduce either the sulfenic acid or the disulfide, but the disulfide was a preferred substrate for thioredoxin, a natural electron donor. Interestingly, the C69S mutant could complement MsrA/MsrB deficiency in yeast, and the corresponding natural form of mouse MsrB was active with thioredoxin. These data indicate that MsrB proteins employ alternative mechanisms for sulfenic acid reduction. Four other conserved cysteines in Drosophila MsrB (Cys(51), Cys(54), Cys(101), and Cys(104)) were found to coordinate structural zinc. Mutation of any one or a combination of these residues resulted in complete loss of metal and catalytic activity, demonstrating an essential role of zinc in Drosophila MsrB. In contrast, two conserved histidines were important for thioredoxin-dependent activity, but were not involved in zinc binding. A Drosophila MsrA gene was also cloned, and the recombinant enzyme was found to be metal-free and specific for methionine S-sulfoxide and to employ a similar sulfenic acid/disulfide mechanism.     

Analyses of methionine sulfoxide reductase activities towards free and peptidyl methionine sulfoxides

There have been insufficient kinetic data that enable a direct comparison between free and peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase activities of either MsrB or MsrA. In this study, we determined the kinetic parameters of mammalian and yeast MsrBs and MsrAs for the reduction of both free methionine sulfoxide (Met-O) and peptidyl Met-O under the same assay conditions. Catalytic efficiency of mammalian and yeast MsrBs towards free Met-O was >2000-fold lower than that of yeast fRMsr, which is specific for free Met-R-O. The ratio of free to peptide Msr activity in MsrBs was 1:20-40. In contrast, mammalian and yeast MsrAs reduced free Met-O much more efficiently than MsrBs. Their k(cat) values were 40-500-fold greater than those of the corresponding MsrBs. The ratio of free to peptide Msr activity was 1:0.8 in yeast MsrA, indicating that this enzyme can reduce free Met-O as efficiently as peptidyl Met-O. In addition, we analyzed the in vivo free Msr activities of MsrBs and MsrAs in yeast cells using a growth complementation assay. Mammalian and yeast MsrBs, as well as the corresponding MsrAs, had apparent in vivo free Msr activities. The in vivo free Msr activities of MsrBs and MsrAs agreed with their in vitro activities.     

Evidence for a new sub-class of methionine sulfoxide reductases B with an alternative thioredoxin recognition signature

Methionine sulfoxide reductases catalyze the reduction of protein-bound methionine sulfoxide back to methionine via a thioredoxin-recycling process. Two classes of methionine sulfoxide reductases, called MsrA and MsrB, exist that display opposite stereoselectivities toward the sulfoxide function. Although they are structurally unrelated, they share a similar chemical mechanism that includes three steps with 1) formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate with a concomitant release of 1 mol of methionine per mole of enzyme; 2) formation of an intradisulfide Msr bond; and 3) reduction of the oxidized Msr by thioredoxin. In the MsrBs that have been biochemically, enzymatically, and structurally characterized so far, the cysteine involved in the regeneration of the catalytic Cys-117 is Cys-63. Cys-117 is located on a beta strand, whereas the recycling Cys-63 is on a loop near Cys-117. The distance between the two cysteines is compatible with formation of the Cys-117/Cys-63 intradisulfide bond. Analyses of MsrB sequences show that at least 37% of the MsrBs do not possess the recycling Cys-63. In the present study, it is shown that Cys-31 in the Xanthomonas campestris MsrB, which is located on another loop, can efficiently substitute for Cys-63. Such a result implies flexibility of the MsrB structures, at least of the loops on which Cys-31 or Cys-63 are located. The fact that about 25% of the putative MsrBs have no recycling cysteine supports other recycling processes in which thioredoxin is not operative.     

Thioredoxin as a reducing agent for mammalian methionine sulfoxide reductases B lacking resolving cysteine

Previous reports described thioredoxin (Trx) as a very poor reductant for mammalian MsrB2 and MsrB3, which lack a resolving Cys residue. In contrast, we here report that Trx could reduce both MsrB2 and MsrB3 enzymes, similarly to the reduction of mammalian MsrA. We demonstrated that functional Trx is required for the reduction of these enzymes. We further identified MsrB2- or MsrB3-Trx complexes formed through intermolecular disulfide bonds involving catalytic residue of Trx. The present study provides evidence that the sulfenic acid intermediate of oxidized MsrBs lacking resolving Cys could interact with Trx and be directly reduced by this protein.     

Characterization of the amino acids from Neisseria meningitidis methionine sulfoxide reductase B involved in the chemical catalysis and substrate specificity of the reductase step

Methionine sulfoxide reductases (Msrs) are antioxidant repair enzymes that catalyze the thioredoxin-dependent reduction of methionine sulfoxide back to methionine. The Msr family is composed of two structurally unrelated classes of enzymes named MsrA and MsrB, which display opposite stereoselectivities toward the S and R isomers of the sulfoxide function, respectively. Both classes of Msr share a similar three-step chemical mechanism involving first a reductase step that leads to the formation of a sulfenic acid intermediate. In this study, the invariant amino acids of Neisseria meningitidis MsrB involved in the reductase step catalysis and in substrate binding have been characterized by the structure-function relationship approach. Altogether the results show the following: 1) formation of the MsrB-substrate complex leads to an activation of the catalytic Cys-117 characterized by a decreased pKapp of approximately 2.7 pH units; 2) the catalytic active MsrB form is the Cys-117-/His-103+ species with a pKapp of 6.6 and 8.3, respectively; 3) His-103 and to a lesser extent His-100, Asn-119, and Thr-26 (via a water molecule) participate in the stabilization of the polarized form of the sulfoxide function and of the transition state; and 4) Trp-65 is essential for the catalytic efficiency of the reductase step by optimizing the position of the substrate in the active site. A scenario for the reductase step is proposed and discussed in comparison with that of MsrA.     

Corynebacterium glutamicum Methionine Sulfoxide Reductase A Uses both Mycoredoxin and Thioredoxin for Regeneration and Oxidative Stress Resistance

Oxidation of methionine leads to the formation of the S and R diastereomers of methionine sulfoxide (MetO), which can be reversed by the actions of two structurally unrelated classes of methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr), MsrA and MsrB, respectively. Although MsrAs have long been demonstrated in numerous bacteria, their physiological and biochemical functions remain largely unknown in Actinomycetes. Here, we report that a Corynebacterium glutamicum methionine sulfoxide reductase A (CgMsrA) that belongs to the 3-Cys family of MsrAs plays important roles in oxidative stress resistance. Deletion of the msrA gene in C. glutamicum resulted in decrease of cell viability, increase of ROS production, and increase of protein carbonylation levels under various stress conditions. The physiological roles of CgMsrA in resistance to oxidative stresses were corroborated by its induced expression under various stresses, regulated directly by the stress-responsive extracytoplasmic-function (ECF) sigma factor SigH. Activity assays performed with various regeneration pathways showed that CgMsrA can reduce MetO via both the thioredoxin/thioredoxin reductase (Trx/TrxR) and mycoredoxin 1/mycothione reductase/mycothiol (Mrx1/Mtr/MSH) pathways. Site-directed mutagenesis confirmed that Cys56 is the peroxidatic cysteine that is oxidized to sulfenic acid, while Cys204 and Cys213 are the resolving Cys residues that form an intramolecular disulfide bond. Mrx1 reduces the sulfenic acid intermediate via the formation of an S-mycothiolated MsrA intermediate (MsrA-SSM) which is then recycled by mycoredoxin and the second molecule of mycothiol, similarly to the glutathione/glutaredoxin/glutathione reductase (GSH/Grx/GR) system. However, Trx reduces the Cys204-Cys213 disulfide bond in CgMsrA produced during MetO reduction via the formation of a transient intermolecular disulfide bond between Trx and CgMsrA. While both the Trx/TrxR and Mrx1/Mtr/MSH pathways are operative in reducing CgMsrA under stress conditions in vivo, the Trx/TrxR pathway alone is sufficient to reduce CgMsrA under normal conditions. Based on these results, a catalytic model for the reduction of CgMsrA by Mrx1 and Trx is proposed.     

The three-dimensional structures of peptide methionine sulfoxide reductases: current knowledge and open questions

Methionine sulfoxides are easily formed in proteins exposed to reactive oxidative species commonly present in cells. Their reduction back to methionine residues is catalyzed by peptide methionine sulfoxide reductases. Although grouped in a unique family with respect to their biological function, these enzymes are divided in two classes named MsrA and MsrB, depending on the sulfoxide enantiomer of the substrate they reduce. This specificity-based classification differentiates enzymes which display no sequence homology. Several three-dimensional structures of peptide methionine sulfoxide reductases have been determined, so that members of both classes are known to date. These crystal structures are reviewed in this paper. The folds and active sites of MsrAs and MsrBs are discussed in the light of the methionine sulfoxide reductase sequence diversity.