Effect of endogenous and exogenous progesterone on the oestradiol-induced LH surge in dairy cows

Four cows released an LH surge after 1.0 mg oestradiol benzoate administered i.m. during the post-partum anoestrous period with continuing low plasma progesterone. A similar response occurred in the early follicular phase when plasma progesterone concentration at the time of injection was less than 0.5 ng/ml. Cows treated with a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) for 8 days were injected with cloprostenol on the 5th day to remove any endogenous source of progesterone. Oestradiol was injected on the 7th day when the plasma progesterone concentration from the PRID was between 0.7 and 1.5 ng/ml. No LH surge occurred. Similarly, oestradiol benzoate injected in the luteal phase of 3 cows (0.9-2.1 ng progesterone/ml plasma) did not provoke an LH surge. An oestradiol challenge given to 3 cows 6 days after ovariectomy induced a normal LH surge in each cow. However, when oestradiol treatment was repeated on the 7th day of PRID treatment, none released LH. It is concluded that ovaries are not necessary for progesterone to inhibit the release of LH, and cows with plasma progesterone concentrations greater than 0.5 ng/ml, whether endogenous or exogenous, did not release LH in response to oestradiol.     

Induction of daily PRL surges in rats by chronic treatment with progesterone

The effect of a high plasma progesterone level on the PRL releasing mechanism was investigated in rats of both sexes. Progesterone levels were maintained by implanting silicone tubes filled with the steroid. In the intact female, 6 progesterone tubes (inner diameter 2 mm; outer diameter 3 mm; length 40 mm) were implanted subcutaneously on the estrous day. With 2- to 5- day latent periods, the daily rise in the plasma PRL level was observed coincident with the time of nocturnal surge in the pseudopregnant rats induced by cervical stimulation. The same treatment applied to ovariectomized rats induced by cervical stimulation. The same treatment applied to ovariectomized rats induced diurnal and nocturnal surges. The peak height was lower in ovariectomized rats than that in intact or normal pseudopregnant rats, and was restored to almost the normal range by concomitant implantation of estradiol with progesterone. This latter protocol, however, did not induce any PRL surge in chronically orchidectomized rats. These results suggest that chronically elevated progesterone levels can induce such PRL surges as are observed in pseudopregnant rats, estradiol enhances the magnitude of the PRL surge, and the progesterone sensitive central mechanism, controlling the PRL surge, does not exist in adult male rats.     

Suppression of the prolactin surges in the pseudopregnant rat by urethane anesthesia

In pseudopregnancy of the rat prolactin (PRL) is released in the form of twice daily surges (nocturnal and diurnal surges). An attempt was made to examine the effects of urethane anesthesia on PRL surges during pseudopregnancy of the rat. In a preliminary study, using the continuous blood sampling method, the nocturnal PRL surge was completely blocked when urethane (1.0g/kg BW) was administered at 0:00 hr. Urethane (1.0g/kg BW) was injected at 0:00 or 12:00 hr, and serum and pituitary PRL concentrations were measured at 6:00 or 18:00 hr, respectively, to study the effects of urethane on nocturnal or diurnal PRL surges. There were no serum PRL surges during either the nocturnal or diurnal periods following urethane injection. The experiment examining pituitary PRL concentration at 6:00 or 18:00 hr confirmed that urethane (1.0g/kg) anesthesia suppressed the release of PRL surge from the pituitary.     

The roles of prolactin and testosterone in the development and function of granulosa lutein tissue in the rat

The luteotropic roles of prolactin and testosterone (or estradiol formed in luteal tissue) were investigated in hypophysectomized rats with homografts of granulosa lutein tissue. Using this approach, we could determine the effects of prolactin independently of estrogen, since granulosa lutein tissue does not produce estrogen de novo under these conditions. Luteinizing granulosa cells were expressed from the ovaries of immature pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin-primed Fischer 344 rats 6 h after injection of human chorionic gonadotropin. The cells were transplanted beneath the kidney capsule of adult, hypophysectomized, ovariectomized Fischer 344 recipients, which were treated with hormones daily for 12 or 14 days. In rats without treatment (no hormones, n = 3) and in rats treated with only testosterone (Silastic capsule, n = 6), only small amounts of luteal tissue (less than 5 mg/rat) were found and serum progesterone remained at low concentrations (10 ng or less) throughout the experiment. In contrast, in rats treated either with ovine prolactin (300 micrograms/day, n = 10) or with the combination of prolactin and testosterone (n = 12), serum progesterone increased to 43 ng/ml by Day 8. Beyond Day 8, serum progesterone continued to rise in rats treated with the combination of prolactin and testosterone to reach a mean value of 87 ng/ml by Day 14, and mean homograft wet weight was 49 mg/rat; in rats treated with only prolactin, serum progesterone decreased to 25 ng/ml by Day 14 and homograft wet weight was lower (24 mg/rat). Prolactin and testosterone together stimulated more homograft aromatase activity in vivo than did prolactin alone, but the in vitro production of progesterone was not different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evidence that physiological levels of circulating leptin exert a stimulatory effect on luteinizing hormone and prolactin surges in rats.

Increasing evidence suggests that leptin, an adipocyte-derived hormone, may positively regulate the reproductive axis, and serve as a critical metabolic signal linking nutrition and the reproductive function. However, along this line there remains an as-of-yet unresolved important issue whether physiological levels of circulating leptin exert a stimulatory effect on the reproductive axis. It is also unknown whether hyperleptinemia affects the reproductive function. In this study, we attempted to examine these unexplored issues, employing as an indicator the estradiol/progesterone-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin (PRL) surges in ovariectomized female rats. Experiments were performed on normally fed, 3-day starved, 3-day starved + murine leptin (100 microg/kg/day), and normally fed + murine leptin (300 microg/kg/day) groups. Leptin was administered utilizing osmotic minipumps during 3 days immediately before experimentation. From 11:00 to 18:00 h, blood was collected every 30 min to measure LH and PRL. The 3-day starvation completely abolished both LH and PRL surges, but 3-day starved + leptin (100 microg/kg/day) group, whose plasma leptin levels (3.7 +/- 0.4 ng/ml) were similar to those in normally fed group (3.4 +/- 0.5 ng/ml), showed a significant recovery of the hormonal surges. On the other hand, the magnitudes of LH and PRL surges in normally fed + leptin (300 microg/kg/day) group, whose leptin levels were 10.8 +/- 1.5 ng/ml, were statistically the same as those in normally fed group. These results indicate for the first time that physiological concentrations of circulating leptin exert a stimulatory effect on the steroid-induced LH and PRL surges in the rat. It was also suggested that mild hyperleptinemia of 3 days' duration may not significantly affect the hormonal surges.     

Prolactin administration during the luteal and follicular phase of the oestrous cycle of gilts

In Exp. I infusions of prolactin (0.5 mg in 2 ml sterile saline) were repeated every 2 h for 36 h on Days 12-13 of the cycle. In Exp. II infusions of prolactin were administered from Days 17 to 19 (60 h) at 2-h intervals. Control gilts were given 2 ml sterile saline at similar intervals during the same period. Basal prolactin concentrations before initiation of infusions ranged from 1.3 +/- 0.1 to 5.6 +/- 2.2 ng/ml in both experiments. By 5 min after a prolactin infusion, mean plasma prolactin concentration ranged from 74.9 +/- 5.8 to 113.0 +/- 9.5 ng/ml, but then declined to approximately equal to 10 ng/ml just before the next infusion of prolactin. Administration of prolactin during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle of the gilts had no effect on basal levels of progesterone, oestradiol or LH. During the follicular phase there were no differences (P greater than 0.05) between control and prolactin-treated gilt progesterone and LH concentrations, but oestradiol plasma values were decreased (P less than 0.05) on the 2nd and 3rd day of prolactin treatment. Our results would indicate that prolactin does not play a major role in the regulation of the oestrous cycle of the pig.     

The influence of estradiol-17beta and progesterone on peripheral serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in the ovariectomized ewe

Serum gonadotropin concentrations were high and variable and fluctuated episodically in short and long term ovariectomized ewes. Treatment with solid silastic implants releasing progesterone (serum levels 1.81 +/- 0.16 ng/ml) had no consistent effect. Treatment with implants releasing estradiol-17beta significantly depressed mean serum gonadotropin concentrations and peak height to values usually seen in intact ewes. This occurred regardless of implant size and serum estradiol-17beta concentrations (range 11 +/- 0.3 pg/ml to 98 +/- 12.8 pg/ml). Progesterone and estradiol-17beta together significantly depressed the frequency of peaks in LH concentration. Following progesterone removal, 95% of the ewes treated with progesterone and estradiol-17beta implants experienced a transient increase in serum LH concentrations similar to the preovulatory surge in intact ewes. Eighty-four percent of the LH surges were accompanied by a surge in serum FSH concentrations. However, following progesterone removal, 5.1 +/- 2.1 FSH surges were observed over six days. Gonadotropin surges occurred regardless of estradiol-17beta implant size and with or without the influence of supplemental estradiol-17beta.     

LH release and luteal function in post-partum acyclic ewes after the pulsatile administration of LH-RH

The administration of LH-RH in a pulsatile regimen (100 ng i.v./h for 48 h) to acyclic ewes 26-30 days post partum increased plasma LH concentrations, and both the frequency and amplitude of plasma LH pulses. In 12/14 ewes these increases were followed by plasma LH surges similar to the preovulatory surges observed in 10 control cyclic ewes. Subsequent luteal function in the post-partum ewes was deficient. Plasma progesterone was detected in 7/12 post-partum ewes showing plasma LH surges. The concentrations were lower (1.3 +/- 0.2 ng/ml) and detected for shorter periods (3-10 days) than in cyclic ewes (2.4 +/- 0.2 ng/ml, 12/15 days). In the post-partum ewes the increases in plasma LH concentrations before the LH surge were higher but of shorter duration than in the cyclic ewes. The inadequate luteal function in the post-partum ewes could therefore have been due to inappropriate LH stimulation of the ovary before the LH surge.     

Compensation by pulsatile GnRH infusions for incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovariectomized gilts and castrated male pigs.

The aim of this study was to investigate incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovariectomized gilts and male pigs. Gilts (250 days old; n = 36), which had been ovariectomized 30 (OVX 30) or 100 days (OVX 100) before the start of treatment, were challenged i.m. with oestradiol benzoate and were either given no further treatment, fed methallibure to inhibit endogenous GnRH release or fed methallibure and given i.v. pulses of 100 or 200 ng GnRH agonist at 1 h intervals during the LH surge (48-96 h after oestradiol benzoate). The same treatments were applied to long-term orchidectomized male pigs (ORC, n = 23). In addition, one ORC group was not injected with oestradiol benzoate but was fed methallibure and given pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist. Oestradiol benzoate alone induced an LH surge in the OVX 30 group only (5/6 gilts), methallibure suppressed (P < 0.05) oestradiol benzoate-induced LH secretion, while pulses of 100 ng GnRH agonist in animals fed methallibure produced LH surges in four of six OVX 30 and four of six OVX 100 gilts. The induced LH surges were similar to those produced by oestradiol benzoate alone in OVX 30 gilts. Pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist produced LH surges in OVX 30 (6/6) and OVX 100 (6/6) gilts and increased the magnitude of the induced LH surge in OVX 100 gilts (P < 0.05 compared with 100 ng GnRH agonist or OVX 30 control). Pulses of 200 ng GnRH agonist also induced LH surge release in ORC male pigs (5/6), but were unable to increase LH concentrations in a surge-like manner in ORC animals that had not been given oestradiol benzoate, indicating that oestradiol increases pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. These results support the hypothesis that oestradiol must inhibit secretion of LH before an LH surge can occur. It is concluded that incompetence for oestradiol-induced LH surges in long-term ovarian secretion-deprived gilts and in male pigs is due to the failure of oestradiol to promote a sufficient increase in the release of GnRH.     

Effects of oestradiol on LH, FSH and prolactin in ovariectomized ewes

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the rate (dose/time) at which oestradiol-17 beta (oestradiol) is presented to the hypothalamo-pituitary axis influences secretion of LH, FSH and prolactin. A computer-controlled infusion system was used to produce linearly increasing serum concentrations of oestradiol in ovariectomized ewes over a period of 60 h. Serum samples were collected from ewes every 2 h from 8 h before to 92 h after start of infusion, and assayed for oestradiol, LH, FSH and prolactin. Rates of oestradiol increase were categorized into high (0.61-1.78 pg/h), medium (0.13-0.60 pg/h) and low (0.01-0.12 pg/h). Ewes receiving high rates of oestradiol (N = 11) responded with a surge of LH 12.7 +/- 2.0 h after oestradiol began to increase, whereas ewes receiving medium (N = 15) and low (N = 11) rates of oestradiol responded with a surge of LH at 19.4 +/- 1.7 and 30.9 +/- 2.0 h, respectively. None of the surges of LH was accompanied by a surge of FSH. Serum concentrations of FSH decreased and prolactin increased in ewes receiving high and medium rates of oestradiol, when compared to saline-infused ewes (N = 8; P less than 0.05). We conclude that rate of increase in serum concentrations of oestradiol controls the time of the surge of LH and secretion of prolactin and FSH in ovariectomized ewes. We also suggest that the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of LH may be different from the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of FSH.     

Interaction between ovarian and adrenal steroids in the regulation of gonadotropin secretion

Recent work from our laboratory suggests that a complex interaction exists between ovarian and adrenal steroids in the regulation of preovulatory gonadotropin secretion. Ovarian estradiol serves to set the neutral trigger for the preovulatory gonadotropin surge, while progesterone from both the adrenal and the ovary serves to (1) initiate, (2) synchronize, (3) potentiate and (4) limit the preovulatory LH surge to a single day. Administration of RU486 or the progesterone synthesis inhibitor, trilostane, on proestrous morning attenuated the preovulatory LH surge. Adrenal progesterone appears to play a role in potentiating the LH surge since RU486 still effectively decreased the LH surge even in animals ovariectomized at 0800 h on proestrus. The administration of ACTH to estrogen-primed ovariectomized (ovx) immature rats caused a LH and FSH surge 6 h later, demonstrating that upon proper stimulation, the adrenal can induce gonadotropin surges. The effect was specific for ACTH, required estrogen priming, and was blocked by adrenalectomy or RU486, but not by ovariectomy. Certain corticosteroids, most notably deoxycorticosterone and triamcinolone acetonide, were found to possess "progestin-like" activity in the induction of LH and FSH surges in estrogen-primed ovx rats. In contrast, corticosterone and dexamethasone caused a preferential release of FSH, but not LH. Progesterone-induced surges of LH and FSH appear to require an intact N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) neurotransmission line, since administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK801, blocked the ability of progesterone to induce LH and FSH surges. Similarly, NMDA neurotransmission appears to be a critical component in the expression of the preovulatory gonadotropin surge since administration of MK801 during the critical period significantly diminished the LH and PRL surge in the cycling adult rat. FSH levels were lowered by MK801 treatment, but the effect was not statistically significant. The progesterone-induced gonadotropin surge appears to also involve mediation through NPY and catecholamine systems. Immediately preceding the onset of the LH and FSH surge in progesterone-treated estrogen-primed ovx. rats, there was a significant elevation of MBH and POA GnRH and NPY levels, which was followed by a significant fall at the onset of the LH surge. The effect of progesterone on inducing LH and FSH surges also appears to involve alpha 1 and alpha 2 adrenergic neuron activation since prazosin and yohimbine (alpha 1 and 2 blockers, respectively) but not propranolol (a beta-blocker) abolished the ability of progesterone to induce LH and FSH surges. Progesterone also caused a dose-dependent decrease in occupied nuclear estradiol receptors in the pituitary.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Plasma progesterone concentrations and length of the first spontaneous oestrous cycle in pubertal rats

The length of the first spontaneous oestrous cycle in pubertal Wistar-Imamichi strain rats determined by vaginal smears varied from 5 to 18 days. The variation was ascribed to the period (3-16 days) of the stage of vaginal smears consisting of leucocytic cells (L stage). Plasma progesterone concentration and the decidual reaction in the uterus were used as indicators of the function of the corpus luteum and the L stage period was categorized as short, lasting for 3-6 days (average 4 days) with non-functional corpora lutea, or long, lasting 9-16 days (average 12 days) and with functional corpora lutea. Rats with the long L stage showed nocturnal and diurnal prolactin surges, but no daily changes in prolactin values were observed in rats with a short L stage. Daily changes in prolactin concentrations were maintained by the administration of progesterone in rats ovariectomized on Day 6 of the L stage. Plasma progesterone values on Day 6 of the L stage decreased with ergocornine treatment on Days 4 and 5 of the L stage and administration of bovine prolactin restored the level. These results indicate that the L stage observed in the first oestrous cycle is maintained by a positive feedback relation between progesterone and prolactin secretions.     

Effect of pentobarbitone sodium and bromocriptine on follicular oestradiol production in the rat

Injection of an ovulation-blocking dose of pentobarbitone sodium given in the early afternoon of pro-oestrus in rats decreased follicular oestradiol production in vitro the next day (2.42 +/- 0.11 ng/4 h/follicle in pro-oestrous rats, 0.49 +/- 0.04 ng/4 h/follicle in pentobarbitone-treated rats). Pentobarbitone, given 1 day earlier (at dioestrus II), prevented the increase in oestradiol production that normally occurs between di-oestrus II and pro-oestrus. Injection of a subovulatory amount of hCG (0.5 i.u.) given after pentobarbitone injection inhibited the decrease in follicular oestradiol production induced by pentobarbitone. The pentobarbitone-induced decrease in oestradiol production was also prevented by bromocriptine (1 mg) given at di-oestrus II (15:00 h) and pro-oestrus (09:00 h). Bromocriptine is an effective inhibitor of prolactin secretion and this suggests therefore that the decrease in follicular oestradiol production after pentobarbitone is due to the preovulatory surge of prolactin. However, pretreatment with bromocriptine also inhibited the effect of pentobarbitone on oestradiol production when pentobarbitone was given at di-oestrus II. Moreover, when ergocornine (another inhibitor of prolactin secretion) was used instead of pentobarbitone to block ovulation, follicular oestradiol production was also decreased the next day. In contrast to bromocriptine, ergocornine was not able to prevent the pentobarbitone-induced decrease in follicular oestradiol production. These results indicate that the decrease in follicular oestradiol production after pentobarbitone injection is due to inhibition of the serum concentrations of LH rather than the preovulatory surge of prolactin. How bromocriptine (but not ergocornine) prevents the pentobarbitone-induced decrease in oestradiol production is not clear.     

Extrahypothalamic control of daily surges of prolactin secretion in pseudopregnant rat

The role of the limbic forebrain structures in controlling twice daily surges of prolactin (PRL) induced by cervical stimulation was investigated after acute or chronic deafferentation of the limbic forebrain afferents to the hypothalamus in rats. The preoptic area-roof section (POA-RS), which interrupted the rostral limbic afferents at the dorsal level of the anterior commissure, induced pseudopregnancy (PSP) and initiated the same nocturnal PRL surges as those initiated by the cervical stimulation. Diurnal PRL surges, however, did not occur following this procedure. The nocturnal PRL surge by POA-RS also occurred in ovariectomized rats. Deafferentation between the diagonal band of Broca and the medial preoptic area (F2-cut) initiated PSP in 37 % of the rats and induced an apparent but small nocturnal PRL surge. The rats with POA-RS or F2-cut showed restoration of their regular estrous cyclicities. Cervical stimulation after POA-RS did not affect the initiation of nocturnal PRL surge induced by POA-RS alone. POA-RS after cervical stimulation also did not affect the initiation of nocturnal PRL surge induced by cervical stimulation, though a diurnal PRL surge was initiated in these rats. The cut made just before the diagonal band of Broca after cervical stimulation did not inhibit the occurrence of either surge. Nocturnal and diurnal PRL surges were manifested after cervical stimulation in the rats with chronic POA-RS or F2-cut and their vaginal cyclicities were resumed. These results suggest that the limbic forebrain structures are not indispensable for the initiation of nocturnal PRL surges induced by cervical stimulation but may modify the hypothalamic mechanism(s) initiating a nocturnal PRL surge through the rostral part of the hypothalamus.     

Effect of acute immunoneutralization of endogenous leptin on prolactin and LH secretion during the afternoon of pro-oestrus or in steroid-treated ovariectomized female rats

Recent data indicate that leptin is involved in the control of reproductive function. Experiments were carried out to analyse the role of endogenous leptin in the regulation of LH and prolactin secretion during the afternoon of pro-oestrus and that induced by ovarian steroids in ovariectomized rats. In the first experiment, cyclic female rats were implanted with intra-auricular and intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) cannulae and, at pro-oestrus, were injected (i.c.v.) with 10 microliters normal rabbit serum or leptin antiserum (at 13:00 and 14:00 h). Blood samples were obtained at 10:00 h and at intervals of 1 h between 13:00 and 20:00 h. In the second experiment, female rats in pro-oestrus were injected with normal rabbit serum or leptin antiserum at 16:00 and 18:00 h and blood samples were taken every 10 min between 18:00 and 20:00 h. In the third experiment, adult female rats that had been ovariectomized 2 weeks before were implanted with intra-auricular and i.c.v. cannulae and treated with oestradiol benzoate (30 micrograms s.c.) at 10:00 h and progesterone (2 mg s.c.) 48 h later. Normal rabbit serum (10 microliters) or leptin antiserum (10 microliters) were injected (i.c.v.) at 13:00 and 14:00 h, and blood samples were obtained at 10:00 h and at intervals of 1 h between 13:00 and 20:00 h. In the fourth experiment, hemipituitaries from ovariectomized steroid-treated female rats were incubated in the presence of leptin116-130 (an active fragment of the native molecule), GnRH or leptin + GnRH. Prolactin and LH secretion during the afternoon of pro-oestrus in females treated with leptin antiserum was similar to that observed in animals injected with normal rabbit serum. In ovariectomized female rats, the steroid-induced LH surge increased slightly after administration of leptin antiserum, whereas the prolactin surge remained unchanged. In vitro, leptin116-130 (10(-5) to 10(-8) mol l-1) inhibited LH secretion and modulated the effect of GnRH on LH release, depending on the concentration of GnRH: leptin116-130 (10(-6) mol l-1) reduced the effectiveness of 10(-7) mol GnRH l-1 and increased that of 10(-9) mol GnRH l-1. In conclusion, these experiments indicate that acute immunoneutralization of endogenous leptin does not interfere with spontaneous or steroid-induced LH and prolactin surges. In addition, the finding that leptin116-130 inhibited LH release and modulated the effectiveness of GnRH in vitro provides evidence of the direct modulatory role of leptin on LH secretion acting at the pituitary.     

Effects of withholding food for 0-72 h on mating, pregnancy rate and pituitary function in female rats

Food was withheld from female rats for 0-72 h at various stages of the oestrous cycle. Withholding food for periods of 24 h ending at 12:00 h on the day of pro-oestrus reduced the mating rate from 61 to 25% (P less than 0.05) but not the pregnancy rate of those rats that mated. Fasting for 24 h ending at 18:00 h on the day of pro-oestrus reduced the pregnancy rate from 82 to 18% (P less than 0.05) without affecting the mating rate and a 48-h fast starting at 12:00 h on the day of pro-oestrus reduced the pregnancy rate from 82 to 25% (P less than 0.05). Withholding food for 23 h ending at 17:00 h on the day of pro-oestrus prevented the LH and prolactin surges normally present at 17:00 h on this day. The treatments had no apparent effect on the ability of the adenohypophysis to release LH in response to injections of GnRH. When ovariectomized female rats fasted for 0-72 h and given 2 injections of oestradiol dibenzoate to test the ability of the hypothalamus to respond to an increasing plasma oestradiol concentration by stimulating the release of LH, a fast for 24 h reduced and a fast for 72 h completely prevented LH release.     

Oestradiol-17beta, progesterone, FSH and LH in prepubertal calves induced to superovulate

Fluorogestone acetate (vaginal sponge for 4 days) and PMSG (i.m. injection at the time of sponge insertion) treatment was administered to seven 3-month-old calves to induce superovulation. Samples of peripheral plasma were taken every 4 h during treatment (4 days) and then every 2 h for 7 days. FSH, LH, oestradiol and progesterone were measured by radioimmunoassays. In all calves oestradiol concentrations increased 24 h after PMSG injection and reached the highest levels (41-502 pg/ml) during the preovulatory surge of both gonadotropins. The surge of LH and FSH occurred from 12 to 22 h after cessation of treatment. The maximum levels of LH and FSH were 11-72 ng/ml and 23-40 ng/ml respectively and occurred within 4 h of each other. Between 40 and 68 h after the LH peak the concentrations of progesterone began to increase from basal values, reaching 24.0-101.7 ng/ml when the animals were killed. A quantitative relationship was found between plasma oestradiol concentration and the numbers of ovulating follicles. Progesterone levels seemed to be related to the numbers of corpora lutea and also to the numbers of unovulated follicles. Gonadotrophin output was not quantitatively related to ovarian activity or to steroid secretion.     

Effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus

The effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus were investigated in two experiments. In the first experiment, the introduction of rams induced an increase in the levels of LH in entire ewes. The mean levels increased from 0.68 +/- 0.04 ng/ml (mean +/- s.e.m.) to 4.49 +/- 1.32 ng/ml within 20 min in ewes not treated with progesterone (n = 10). In ewes bearing progesterone implants that provided a peripheral concentration of about 1.5 ng progesterone per millilitre plasma, the LH response to the introduction of rams was not prevented, but was reduced in size so that the concentration was 1.38 +/- 0.15 ng/ml after 20 min (n = 5). Progesterone treatment begun either 2 days before or 6 h after the introduction of rams and maintained for 4 days prevented ovulation. In the second experiment ovariectomized ewes were used to investigate further the mechanism by which the ram evoked increases in tonic LH secretion. In ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants, the introduction of rams increased the frequency of the LH pulses and the basal level of LH. In the absence of oestradiol there was no significant change in pulse frequency but a small increase in basal levels. Progesterone again did not prevent but reduced the responses in ewes treated with oestradiol. It is suggested that following the withdrawal of progesterone treatment, the secretion of LH pulses in response to the ram effect would be dampened. This effect could be a component of the reported long delay between the introduction of rams and the preovulatory surge of LH in ewes treated with progesterone. Continued progesterone treatment prevented ovulation, probably by blocking positive feedback by oestradiol.     

Involvement of the neurointermediate lobe of the pituitary gland in the secretion of prolactin and luteinizing hormone in the rat

The relationship between prolactin (PRL) secretion and the neurointermediate lobe (NIL) of the pituitary gland was investigated. Plasma PRL concentrations in rats bearing anterior pituitaries autografted with or without the NIL to the renal capsule were elevated to equal extents at 1 through 6 weeks after surgery (p > 0.10). PRL levels in ovariectomized rats in which the NIL had been removed surgically (NIL-X) or only visualized (NIL-C) were 3–7 ng/ml 4, 7, and 28 days after surgery (p > 0.10); however, they were slightly higher in NIL-X $\text{vs.}$ NIL-C rats 14 days after surgery (p < 0.05). Plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations in NIL-C rats increased by 36% from 2 to 4 weeks after surgery (p < 0.05); this increase was not detected in NIL-X rats. PRL and LH surges were induced by estradiol implants in ovariectomized NIL-X and NIL-C rats; the profiles of the PRL surges were superimposable, although the magnitude of the LH surge was only 50% that in NIL-C rats (p < 0.05). These results cast doubt on the importance of the NIL in the regulation of PRL secretion either $\text{via}$ secreting hypophysiotropic hormones or $\text{via}$ conducting anterior pituitary hormones directly to the median eminence. However, the NIL may have a physiologically important role in the regulation of LH secretion.     

Prolactin as a factor in the uterine response to progesterone in rabbits

The direct effect of prolactin on uteroglobin production and on uterine endometrial oestrogen and progesterone receptor concentrations was tested by using ovariectomized rabbits (at least 12 weeks) treated with prolactin; prolactin + progesterone; prolactin + oestradiol + progesterone; oestradiol + progesterone; or progesterone alone. Prolactin treatment produced a significant (P less than 0.05) increase in the concentration of cytosolic oestrogen and progesterone receptors, restoring the concentrations to values found at oestrus. However, the concentration of nuclear receptors remained low. In the remaining treatment categories there was no significant (P greater than 0.05) increase in the concentration of oestrogen and progesterone receptors compared with those in ovariectomized controls. However, the sequential treatment of ovariectomized animals with prolactin + progesterone stimulated uteroglobin production to a concentration equal to that found in intact rabbits on the 5th day of pregnancy. This was not achieved by prolactin or progesterone alone or with oestradiol. These results suggest that prolactin acts as an essential factor in the rabbit uterine response to progesterone, perhaps by the modulation of progesterone receptor activity.