Physical association of uPAR with the alphaV integrin on the surface of human NK cells

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) serves as a receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and plays a role in invasion and migration of certain immune cells, including NK cells. Although uPAR is anchored to the plasma membrane via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol lipid moiety, we have previously shown that uPAR crosslinking results in MAP kinase signaling and increased integrin expression on the surface of the human NK cell line, YT. We report, herein, that the binding of uPA to uPAR also activates the MAP kinase signaling cascade. Furthermore, we show the physical association between uPAR and integrins on YT cells using cocapping and fluorescence microscopy. These results suggest that signaling initiated by either uPAR binding to uPA or by uPAR clustering may depend on the physical association of uPAR with integrins, a process that may be a prerequisite for NK cell accumulation within established tumor metastases during adoptive therapy.     

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator binding to its receptor stimulates tumor cell migration by enhancing integrin-mediated signal transduction.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) participate in matrix degradation and cell migration by focusing proteolysis and functioning as a signaling ligand/receptor complex. uPAR, anchored by a lipid moiety in the membrane, is thought to require a transmembrane adapter to transduce signals into the cytoplasm. To study uPAR signaling, we transfected the prostate carcinoma cell line LNCaP, which does not express endogenous uPA or uPAR, with a uPAR encoding cDNA, resulting in high-level surface expression. We studied migration of these cells on fibronectin, which is mediated by the integrin alpha5beta1. Ligation of uPAR with uPA or its amino-terminal fragment enhanced haptotactic migration to fibronectin. In cells on fibronectin, but not on poly-l-lysine, ligation of uPAR also resulted in tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins, including two proteins involved in integrin signaling, focal adhesion kinase and the crk-associated substrate p130(Cas). Furthermore, after uPAR ligation, uPAR was co-immunoprecipitated with beta1 integrins from the detergent-insoluble fraction of cell lysates. Thus, our data suggest that uPAR occupancy results in an interaction between uPAR and integrins and a potentiation of integrin-mediated signaling, which leads to enhanced cell migration.     

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor induces conformational changes in the integrin alphaMbeta2 headpiece and reorientation of its transmembrane domains

The glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) interacts with the heterodimer cell adhesion molecules integrins to modulate cell adhesion and migration. Devoid of a cytoplasmic domain, uPAR triggers intracellular signaling via its associated molecules that contain cytoplasmic domains. Interestingly, uPAR changes the ectodomain conformation of one of its partner molecules, integrin alpha(5)beta(1), and elicits cytoplasmic signaling. The separation or reorientation of integrin transmembrane domains and cytoplasmic tails are required for integrin outside-in signaling. However, there is a lack of direct evidence showing these conformational changes of an integrin that interacts with uPAR. In this investigation we used reporter monoclonal antibodies and fluorescence resonance energy transfer analyses to show conformational changes in the alpha(M)beta(2) headpiece and reorientation of its transmembrane domains when alpha(M)beta(2) interacts with uPAR.     

Critical role of integrin alpha 5 beta 1 in urokinase (uPA)/urokinase receptor (uPAR,CD87) signaling

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) induces cell adhesion and chemotactic movement. uPA signaling requires its binding to uPA receptor (uPAR/CD87), but how glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR mediates signaling is unclear. uPAR is a ligand for several integrins (e.g. alpha 5 beta 1) and supports cell-cell interaction by binding to integrins on apposing cells (in trans). We studied whether binding of uPAR to alpha 5 beta 1 in cis is involved in adhesion and migration of Chinese hamster ovary cells in response to immobilized uPA. This process was temperature-sensitive and required mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. Anti-uPAR antibody or depletion of uPAR blocked, whereas overexpression of uPAR enhanced, cell adhesion to uPA. Adhesion to uPA was also blocked by deletion of the growth factor domain (GFD) of uPA and by anti-GFD antibody, whereas neither the isolated uPA kringle nor serine protease domain supported adhesion directly. Interestingly, anti-alpha 5 antibody, RGD peptide, and function-blocking mutations in alpha 5 beta 1 blocked adhesion to uPA. uPA-induced cell migration also required GFD, uPAR, and alpha 5 beta 1, but alpha 5 beta 1 alone did not support uPA-induced adhesion and migration. Thus, binding of uPA causes uPAR to act as a ligand for alpha 5 beta 1 to induce cell adhesion, intracellular signaling, and cell migration. We demonstrated that uPA induced RGD-dependent binding of uPAR to alpha 5 beta 1 in solution. These results suggest that uPA-induced adhesion and migration of Chinese hamster ovary cells occurs as a consequence of (a) uPA binding to uPAR through GFD, (b) the subsequent binding of a uPA.uPAR complex to alpha 5 beta 1 via uPAR, and (c) signal transduction through alpha 5 beta 1.     

The Urokinase Receptor Takes Control of Cell Migration by Recruiting Integrins and FPR1 on the Cell Surface

The receptor (uPAR) of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is crucial in cell migration since it concentrates uPA proteolytic activity at the cell surface, binds vitronectin and associates to integrins. uPAR cross-talk with receptors for the formylated peptide fMLF (fMLF-Rs) has been reported; however, cell-surface uPAR association to fMLF-Rs on the cell membrane has never been explored in detail.We now show that uPAR co-localizes at the cell-surface and co-immunoprecipitates with the high-affinity fMLF-R, FPR1, in uPAR-transfected HEK-293 (uPAR-293) cells. uPAR/β1 integrin and FPR1/β1 integrin co-localization was also observed. Serum or the WKYMVm peptide (W Pep), a FPR1 ligand, strongly increased all observed co-localizations in uPAR-293 cells, including FPR1/β1 integrin co-localization. By contrast, a low FPR1/β1 integrin co-localization was observed in uPAR-negative vector-transfected HEK-293 (V-293) cells, that was not increased by serum or W Pep stimulations.The role of uPAR interactions in cell migration was then explored. Both uPAR-293 and V-293 control cells efficiently migrated toward serum or purified EGF. However, cell treatments impairing uPAR interactions with fMLF-Rs or integrins, or inhibiting specific cell-signaling mediators abrogated uPAR-293 cell migration, without exerting any effect on V-293 control cells.Accordingly, uPAR depletion by a uPAR-targeting siRNA or uPAR blocking with an anti-uPAR polyclonal antibody in cells constitutively expressing high uPAR levels totally impaired their migration toward serum.Altogether, these results suggest that both uPAR-positive and uPAR-negative cells are able to migrate toward serum; however, uPAR expression renders cell migration totally and irreversibly uPAR-dependent, since it is completely inhibited by uPAR blocking.We propose that uPAR takes control of cell migration by recruiting fMLF-Rs and β1 integrins, thus promoting their co-localization at the cell-surface and driving pro-migratory signaling pathways.     

Antagonistic Anti-urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) Antibodies Significantly Inhibit uPAR-mediated Cellular Signaling and Migration

Interactions between urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and its various ligands regulate tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Antibodies that bind specific uPAR epitopes may disrupt these interactions, thereby inhibiting these processes. Using a highly diverse and naïve human fragment of the antigen binding (Fab) phage display library, we identified 12 unique human Fabs that bind uPAR. Two of these antibodies compete against urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) for uPAR binding, whereas a third competes with β1 integrins for uPAR binding. These competitive antibodies inhibit uPAR-dependent cell signaling and invasion in the non-small cell lung cancer cell line, H1299. Additionally, the integrin-blocking antibody abrogates uPAR/β1 integrin-mediated H1299 cell adhesion to fibronectin and vitronectin. This antibody and one of the uPAR/uPA antagonist antibodies shows a significant combined effect in inhibiting cell invasion through Matrigel/Collagen I or Collagen I matrices. Our results indicate that these antagonistic antibodies have potential for the detection and treatment of uPAR-expressing tumors.     

Immunocytochemical and biochemical detection of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) in the rat tooth germ and in lipid rafts of PMA-stimulated dental epithelial cells

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) regulates pericellular proteolysis by binding the serine proteinase urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) that promotes cell surface activating of plasminogen to plasmin. In addition, uPAR as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored signaling receptor affects cell migration, differentiation, and proliferation. The aim of the present study was to monitor the occurrence and distribution pattern of uPAR in cells of the rat molar tooth germ. By means of immunocytochemistry moderate, uPAR immunoreactivity was detected in epithelial cells of the enamel organ and in ameloblasts and odontoblasts. RT-PCR and Western blotting experiments demonstrated the expression of uPAR in phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-stimulated dental epithelial cells (HAT-7 cells). A substantial part of uPAR was detected in the detergent-insoluble caveolin-1-containing low-density raft membrane fraction of HAT-7 cells suggesting a partial localization within lipid rafts. However, co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that uPAR and caveolin-1 do not associate with each other directly. Cell stimulation experiments with PMA indicated that protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated signaling pathways contribute to the expression of uPAR in cells of the enamel organ. The localization of uPAR in membrane rafts provides a basis for further investigations on the role of uPAR-mediated signaling cascades in ameloblasts.     

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (CD87) is a ligand for integrins and mediates cell-cell interaction

Binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its receptor (uPAR/CD87) regulates cellular adhesion, migration, and tumor cell invasion. However, it is unclear how glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR, which lacks a transmembrane structure, mediates signal transduction. It has been proposed that uPAR forms cis-interactions with integrins as an associated protein and thereby transduces proliferative or migratory signals to cells upon binding of uPA. We provide evidence that soluble uPAR (suPAR) specifically binds to integrins alpha4beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha9beta1, and alphavbeta3 on Chinese hamster ovary cells in a cation-dependent manner. Anti-integrin and anti-uPAR antibodies effectively block binding of suPAR to these integrins. Binding of suPAR to alpha4beta1 and alphavbeta3 is blocked by known soluble ligands and by the integrin mutations that inhibit ligand binding. These results suggest that uPAR is an integrin ligand rather than, or in addition to, an integrin-associated protein. In addition, we demonstrate that glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR on the cell surface specifically binds to integrins on the apposing cells, suggesting that uPAR-integrin interaction may mediate cell-cell interaction (trans-interaction). These previously unrecognized uPAR-integrin interactions may allow uPAR to transduce signals through the engaged integrin without a hypothetical transmembrane adapter and may provide a potential therapeutic target for control of inflammation and cancer.     

Crystal structure of the human urokinase plasminogen activator receptor bound to an antagonist peptide

We report the crystal structure of a soluble form of human urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR/CD87), which is expressed at the invasive areas of the tumor-stromal microenvironment in many human cancers. The structure was solved at 2.7 A in association with a competitive peptide inhibitor of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)-uPAR interaction. uPAR is composed of three consecutive three-finger domains organized in an almost circular manner, which generates both a deep internal cavity where the peptide binds in a helical conformation, and a large external surface. This knowledge combined with the discovery of a convergent binding motif shared by the antagonist peptide and uPA allowed us to build a model of the human uPA-uPAR complex. This model reveals that the receptor-binding module of uPA engages the uPAR central cavity, thus leaving the external receptor surface accessible for other protein interactions (vitronectin and integrins). By this unique structural assembly, uPAR can orchestrate the fine interplay with the partners that are required to guide uPA-focalized proteolysis on the cell surface and control cell adhesion and migration.     

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor crosslinking in an NK cell line increases integrin surface expression by the MAP kinase/ERK 1/2 signaling pathway

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is attached to cell membranes by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, and as such is devoid of an intracellular domain, but is nevertheless able to initiate signal transduction. Herein, we report a relationship between integrins and uPAR on the surface of the human NK cell line, YT. Our data reveals that crosslinking uPAR, which mimics uPAR clustering at focal adhesion sites, causes increases in expression of the alpha(M), alpha(V), and beta(2) integrins on the surface of YT cells. Activation of the MEK/ERK signaling cascade occurs following uPAR crosslinking, as phosphorylation of both MEK 1/2 and ERK 1/2 results from receptor clustering. The MEK-specific inhibitors PD98059 and U0126 blocked MAP kinase phosphorylation; furthermore, PD98059 inhibited the increase in integrin expression induced by uPAR clustering. This study suggests that uPAR is a signaling receptor and regulator of integrins in NK cells and may impact NK cell function, including the potential for their accumulation within tumor metastases following adoptive transfer.     

The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and cell motility

Cell migration is a complex process requiring tight control of several mechanisms including dynamic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and adhesion to the extracellular matrix. The GPI-anchored urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has an important role in the regulation of cell motility in many cell types. This is partly due to the localization of proteolytic activity on the cell surface by binding of the serine protease uPA. Results accumulated over the last decade suggest that uPAR is also involved in motility control through other mechanisms. These include induction of signal transduction events after ligation with uPA, binding to the extracellular matrix molecule vitronectin (VN), and association with integrins and other transmembrane partners. In this review these mechanisms will be discussed with a special emphasis on how the GPI-linked receptor transmits signals to the intracellular milieu and how uPAR participates in the regulation of actin cytoskeleton reorganization and cell adhesion during cell migration.     

Regulation of urokinase receptor proteolytic function by the tetraspanin CD82

The high affinity interaction between the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its glycolipid-anchored cellular receptor (uPAR) promotes plasminogen activation and the efficient generation of pericellular proteolytic activity. We demonstrate here that expression of the tetraspanin CD82/KAI1 (a tumor metastasis suppressor) leads to a profound effect on uPAR function. Pericellular plasminogen activation was reduced by approximately 50-fold in the presence of CD82, although levels of components of the plasminogen activation system were unchanged. uPAR was present on the cell surface and molecularly intact, but radioligand binding analysis with uPA and anti-uPAR antibodies revealed that it was in a previously undetected cryptic form unable to bind uPA. This was not due to direct interactions between uPAR and CD82, as they neither co-localized on the cell surface nor could be co-immunoprecipitated. However, expression of CD82 led to a redistribution of uPAR to focal adhesions, where it was shown by double immunofluorescence labeling to co-localize with the integrin alpha(5)beta(1), which was also redistributed in the presence of CD82. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that, in the presence of CD82, uPAR preferentially formed stable associations with alpha(5)beta(1), but not with a variety of other integrins, including alpha(3)beta(1). These data suggest that CD82 inhibits the proteolytic function of uPAR indirectly, directing uPAR and alpha(5)beta(1) to focal adhesions and promoting their association with a resultant loss of uPA binding. This represents a novel mechanism whereby tetraspanins, integrins, and uPAR, systems involved in cell adhesion and migration, cooperate to regulate pericellular proteolytic activity and may suggest a mechanism for the tumor-suppressive effects of CD82/KAI1.     

Suppression of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor inhibits proliferation and migration of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells via regulation of ERK/p38 signaling

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) expresses high levels of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR) and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-2, which may play an important role in PDAC progression. The overexpression of uPAR predicted short survival in PDAC patients. In this study, two different PDAC cell lines were used to examine the effect of small interfering (si) RNAs to uPAR, uPA and PAI-2 on proliferation, apoptosis, migration and MAP kinase activation. In both PDAC cell lines, siRNA to uPAR significantly inhibited cell proliferation and migration and stimulated apoptosis, to a greater extent than uPA siRNA. When either PDAC cell line was treated with uPAR siRNA, the level of phosphorylated ERK (p-ERK) decreased substantially, whereas phosphorylated p38 (p-p38) increased when compared to non-silencing control, uPA siRNA or PAI-2 siRNA treatment. This resulted in enhancement of the p-p38/p-ERK ratio which favors cancer cell arrest. Interestingly, uPAR protein expression was suppressed by p-ERK inhibition and stimulated with p-p38 inhibition, suggesting the presence of a positive feedback loop between uPAR and ERK. In summary, our data indicate that, of the uPA system, uPAR exerts the strongest effects on PDAC cells, by acting through the ERK signaling pathway via a positive feedback loop. Disruption of this loop with uPAR siRNA or inhibitor of p-ERK, inhibits PDAC proliferation and migration and promotes apoptosis. These findings suggest that uPAR strongly contributes to PDAC progression and may be considered as a potential anti-pancreatic cancer target.     

An uncleavable uPAR mutant allows dissection of signaling pathways in uPA-dependent cell migration

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) binding to uPAR induces migration, adhesion, and proliferation through multiple interactions with G proteins-coupled receptor FPRL1, integrins, or the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR). At least two forms of uPAR are present on the cell surface: full-length and cleaved uPAR, each specifically interacting with one or more transmembrane proteins. The connection between these interactions and the effects on the signaling pathways activation is not clear. We have exploited an uPAR mutant (hcr, human cleavage resistant) to dissect the pathways involved in uPA-induced cell migration. This mutant is not cleaved by proteases, is glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchored, and binds uPA with a normal K(d). Both wild-type (wt) and hcr-uPAR are able to mediate uPA-induced migration, are constitutively associated with the EGFR, and associate with alpha3beta1 integrin upon uPA binding. However, they engage different pathways in response to uPA. wt-uPAR requires both integrins and FPRL1 to mediate uPA-induced migration, and association of wt-uPAR to alpha3beta1 results in uPAR cleavage and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation. On the contrary, hcr-uPAR does not activate ERK and does not engage FPRL1 or any other G protein-coupled receptor, but it activates an alternative pathway initiated by the formation of a triple complex (uPAR-alpha3beta1-EGFR) and resulting in the autotyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR.     

The urokinase receptor: Focused cell surface proteolysis, cell adhesion and signaling

Plasma membrane urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)-receptor (uPAR) is a GPI-anchored protein that binds with high-affinity and activates the serine protease uPA, thus regulating proteolytic activity at the cell surface. In addition, uPAR is a signaling receptor that often does not require its protease ligand or its proteolytic function.uPAR is highly expressed during tissue reorganization, inflammation, and in virtually all human cancers. Since its discovery, in vitro and in vivo models, as well as retrospective clinical studies have shown that over-expression of components of the uPA/uPAR-system correlates with increased proliferation, migration, and invasion affecting the malignant phenotype of cancer. uPAR regulates the cells-extracellular matrix interactions promoting its degradation and turnover through the plasminogen activation cascade.     

Cross-talk between fMLP and vitronectin receptors triggered by urokinase receptor-derived SRSRY peptide

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) sustains cell migration through its capacity to promote pericellular proteolysis, regulate integrin function, and mediate chemotactic signaling in response to urokinase. We have characterized the early signaling events triggered by the Ser-Arg-Ser-Arg-Tyr (SRSRY) chemotactic uPAR sequence. Cell exposure to SRSRY peptide promotes directional migration on vitronectin-coated filters, regardless of uPAR expression, in a specific and dose-dependent manner, with maximal effect at a concentration level as low as 10 nm. A similar concentration profile is observed in a quantitative analysis of SRSRY-dependent cytoskeletal rearrangements, mostly consisting of filamentous structures localized in a single cell region. SRSRY analogues with alanine substitutions fail to drive F-actin formation and cell migration, indicating a critical role for each amino acid residue. As with ligand-dependent uPAR signaling, SRSRY stimulates protein kinase C activity and results in ERK1/2 phosphorylation. The involvement of the high affinity N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe receptor (FPR) in this process is indicated by the finding that 100 nm N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe inhibits binding of D2D3 to the cell surface, as well as SRSRY-stimulated cell migration and F-actin polarization. Moreover, cell exposure to SRSRY promotes FPR-dependent vitronectin release and increased uPAR.alphavbeta5 vitronectin receptor physical association, indicating that alphavbeta5 activity is regulated by the SRSRY uPAR sequence via FPR. Finally, we provide evidence that alphavbeta5 is required for SRSRY-dependent ERK1/2 phosphorylation, whereas it is not required for protein kinase C activation. The data indicate that the ability of uPAR to stimulate cell migration and cytoskeletal rearrangements is retained by the SRSRY peptide alone and that it is supported by cross-talk between FPR and alphavbeta5.     

Single Amino Acid Substitutions in the Chemotactic Sequence of Urokinase Receptor Modulate Cell Migration and Invasion

The receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) plays an important role in controlling cell migration. uPAR binds urokinase and vitronectin extracellular ligands, and signals in complex with transmembrane receptors such as Formyl-peptide Receptors (FPR)s and integrins. Previous work from this laboratory has shown that synthetic peptides, corresponding to the uPAR_88–92 chemotactic sequence, when carrying the S90P or S90E substitutions, up- or down-regulate cell migration, respectively. To gain mechanistic insights into these opposite cell responses, the functional consequences of S90P and S90E mutations in full-length uPAR were evaluated. First, (HEK)-293 embryonic kidney cells expressing uPAR^S90P exhibit enhanced FPR activation, increased random and directional cell migration, long-lasting Akt phosphorylation, and increased adhesion to vitronectin, as well as uPAR/vitronectin receptor association. In contrast, the S90E substitution prevents agonist-triggered FPR activation and internalization, decreases binding and adhesion to vitronectin, and inhibits uPAR/vitronectin receptor association. Also, 293/uPAR^S90P cells appear quite elongated and their cytoskeleton well organized, whereas 293/uPAR^S90E cells assume a large flattened morphology, with random orientation of actin filaments. Interestingly, when HT1080 cells co-express wild type uPAR with uPAR S90E, the latter behaves as a dominant-negative, impairing uPAR-mediated signaling and reducing cell wound repair as well as lung metastasis in nude mice. In contrast, signaling, wound repair and in vivo lung metastasis of HT1080 cells bearing wild type uPAR are enhanced when they co-express uPAR^S90P. In conclusion, our findings indicate that Ser⁹⁰ is a critical residue for uPAR signaling and that the S90P and S90E exert opposite effects on uPAR activities. These findings may be accommodated in a molecular model, in which uPAR^S90E and uPAR^S90P are forced into inactive and active forms, respectively, suggesting important implications for the development of novel drugs targeting uPAR function.     

Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 inhibits insulin signaling by competing with alphavbeta3 integrin for vitronectin binding.

Functional cooperation between integrins and growth factor receptors has been reported for several systems, one of which is the modulation of insulin signaling by alphavbeta3 integrin. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), competes with alphavbeta3 integrin for vitronectin (VN) binding. Here we report that PAI-1, in a VN-dependent manner, prevents the cooperation of alphavbeta3 integrin with insulin signaling in NIH3T3 fibroblasts, resulting in a decrease in insulin-induced protein kinase B (PKB) phosphorylation, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and cell migration. Insulin-induced HUVEC migration and angiotube formation was also enhanced in the presence of VN and this enhancement is inhibited by PAI-1. By using specific PAI-1 mutants with either VN binding or plasminogen activator (PA) inhibiting activities ablated, we have shown that the PAI-1-mediated interference with insulin signaling occurs through its direct interaction with VN, and not through its PA neutralizing activity. Moreover, using cells deficient for uPA receptor (uPAR) we have demonstrated that the inhibition of PAI-1 on insulin signaling is independent of uPAR-VN binding. These results constitute the first demonstration of the interaction of PAI-1 with the insulin response.     

Rac mediates cytoskeletal rearrangements and increased cell motility induced by urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor binding to vitronectin

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is involved in the regulation of cell motility in a variety of cell types. We show here that expression of human uPAR in growing murine fibroblasts leads to a dramatic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. uPAR expression induces multiple rapidly advancing protrusions that resemble the leading edge of migrating cells. The cytoskeletal changes are independent of uPA and activation of the RGD-binding activity of integrins but require uPAR binding to vitronectin (VN). The actin reorganization is blocked by coexpression of dominant negative versions of either Rac (N17Rac) or p130Cas, but not by inhibitors of Cdc42 or Rho, and is accompanied by a Rac-dependent increase in cell motility. In addition, a fourfold increase in the level of activated Rac is induced by uPAR expression. We conclude that uPAR interacts with VN both to initiate a p130Cas/Rac-dependent signaling pathway leading to actin reorganization and increased cell motility and to act as an adhesion receptor required for these responses. This mechanism may play a role in uPAR-mediated regulation of cell motility at sites where VN and uPAR are co-expressed, such as malignant tumors.