Chromatin assembly in isolated mammalian nuclei.

Cellular DNA replication was stimulated in confluent monolayers of CV-1 monkey kidney cells following infection with SV40. Nuclei were isolated from CV-1 cells labeled with [3H]thymidine and then incubated in the presence of [alpha-32P]deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates under conditions that support DNA replication. To determine whether or not the cellular DNA synthesized in vitro was assembled into nucleosomes the DNA was digested in situ with either micrococcal nuclease or pancreatic DNase I, and the products were examined by electrophoretic and sedimentation analysis. The distribution of DNA fragment lengths on agarose gels following micrococcal nuclease digestion was more heterogeneous for newly replicated than for the bulk of the DNA. Nonetheless, the state of cellular DNA synthesized in vitro (32P-labeled) was found to be identical with that of the DNA in the bulk of the chromatin (3H-labeled) by the following criteria: (i) The extent of protection against digestion by micrococcal nuclease of DNase I. (ii) The size of the nucleosomes (180 base pairs) and core particles (145 base pairs). (iii) The number and sizes of DNA fragments produced by micrococcal nuclease in a limit digest. (iv) The sedimentation behavior on neutral sucrose gradients of nucleoprotein particles released by micrococcal nuclease. (v) The number and sizes of DNA fragments produced by DNase I digestion. These results demonstrate that cellular DNA replicated in isolated nuclei is organized into typical nucleosomes. Consequently, subcellular systems can be used to study the relationship between DNA replication and the assembly of chromatin under physiological conditions.     

Reduced repeat length of nascent nucleosomal DNA is generated by replicating chromatin in vivo

Micrococcal nuclease digestion of nuclei from sea urchin embryos revealed transient changes in chromatin structure which resulted in a reduction in the repeat length of nascent chromatin DNA as compared with bulk DNA. This was considered to be entirely the consequence of in vivo events at the replication fork (Cell 14, 259, 1978). However, a micrococcal nuclease-generated sliding of nucleosome cores relative to nascent DNA, which might account for the smaller DNA fragments, was not excluded. In vivo [3H]thymidine pulse-labeled nuclei were fixed with a formaldehyde prior to micrococcal nuclease digestion. This linked chromatin proteins to DNA and thus prevented any in vitro sliding of histone cores. All the nascent DNAs exhibiting shorter repeat lengths after micrococcal nuclease digestion, were resolved at identical mobilities in polyacrylamide gels of DNA from fixed and unfixed nuclei. We conclude that these differences in repeat lengths between nascent and bulk DNA was generated in vivo by changes in chromatin structure during replication, rather than by micrococcal nuclease-induced sliding of histone cores in vitro.     

Studies on the mode of segregation of histone nu bodies during replication in HeLa cells

Two models were tested for the mode of distribution of histone nu bodies at the replication fork. The replication fork was labeled by brief incubation of cells with ³H-thymidine. Nuclei were isolated and digested with low levels of micrococcal nuclease, and the kinetics of cleavage of the pulse-labeled chromatin DNA were compared to the kinetics of cleavage of parental chromatin DNA. In chromatin labeled for 30 sec to 10 min, the rate of cleavage of the pulse-labeled region into monomeric nu body-sized units exceeded the rate of cleavage of parental chromatin by a factor of 2, but did not approach the predicted value of 5–6 for random segregation. This value dropped to 1.6 in 15 min and was euivalent to parental chromatin in 20 min labeling experiments. DNA synthesized in the presence of cycloheximide was also digested at twice the rate of parental chromatin DNA.A Poisson analysis of the kinetics of cleavage by micrococcal nuclease further confirmed these observations. The predicted difference in the rate of production of monomeric, dimeric, and trimeric deoxyribonucleoprotein units was very similar to the experimental values of both total chromatin and nascent chromatin. Thus the nu body spacings in newly replicated chromatin closely approximate those in parental chromatin.These results agree well with a conservative or nondispersive model of nucleosome distribution in which the proteins are associated with one of the two daughter chromosomes during replication.     

Histone acetylation reduces H1-mediated nucleosome interactions during chromatin assembly

During chromatin replication and nucleosome assembly, newly synthesized histone H4 is acetylated before it is deposited onto DNA, then deacetylated as assembly proceeds. In a previous study (Perry and Annunziato, Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 4275 [1989]) it was shown that when replication occurs in the presence of sodium butyrate (thereby inhibiting histone deacetylation), nascent chromatin fails to mature fully and instead remains preferentially sensitive to DNaseI, more soluble in magnesium, and depleted of histone H1 (relative to mature chromatin). In the following report the relationships between chromatin replication, histone acetylation, and H1-mediated nucleosome aggregation were further investigated. Chromatin was replicated in the presence or absence of sodium butyrate; isolated nucleosomes were stripped of linker histone, reconstituted with H1, and treated to produce Mg(2+)-soluble and Mg(2+)-insoluble chromatin fractions. Following the removal of H1, all solubility differences between chromatin replicated in sodium butyrate for 30 min (bu-chromatin) and control chromatin were lost. Reconstitution with H1 completely restored the preferential Mg(2+)-solubility of bu-chromatin, demonstrating that a reduced capacity for aggregation/condensation is an inherent feature of acetylated nascent nucleosomes; however, titration with excess H1 caused the solubility differences to be lost again. Moreover, when the core histone N-terminal "tails" (the sites of acetylation) were removed by trypsinization prior to reconstitution, H1 was unable to reestablish the altered solubility of chromatin replicated in butyrate. Thus, the core histone "tails," and the acetylation thereof, not only modulate H1-mediated nucleosome interactions in vitro, but also strongly influence the ability of H1 to differentiate between new and old nucleosomes. The data suggest a possible mechanism for the control of H1 deposition and/or chromatin folding during nucleosome assembly.     

Nascent DNA in nucleosome like structures from chromatin

We have used chromatin sensitivity to cleavage by micrococcal nuclease as a probe for differences between chromatin containing nascent DNA and that containing bulk DNA. Micrococcal nuclease digested the nascent DNA in chromatin of swimming blastulae of sea urchins more rapidly to acid-soluble nucleotides than the DNA of bulk chromatin. A part of the nascent DNA occurred in micrococcal nuclease-resistant structures which were either different from, or temporary modifications of, the bulk nucleosomes. This was inferred from the size differences between bulk and nascent DNA fragments in 10% polyacrylamide gels after micrococcal nuclease digestion of nuclei from a mixture of ¹⁴C-thymidine long- and ³H-thymidine pulse-labeled embryos. Bulk monomer and dimer DNA fragments contained about 170 and 410 base pairs (bp), respectively, when 18% of the bulk DNA had been rendered acid-soluble. At this level of digestion, “nascent monomer DNA” fragments of about 150 bp as well as 305 bp “large nascent DNA fragments” were observed. Increasing levels of digestion indicated that the large nascent DNA fragment was derived from a chromatin structure which was more resistant to micrococcal nuclease cleavage than bulk dimer chromatin subunits. Peaks of ³H-thymidine-labeled DNA fragments from embryos which had been pulse-labeled and then chased or labeled for several minutes overlapped those of ¹⁴C-thymidine long-labeled monomer, dimer and trimer fragments. This indicated that the chromatin organization at or near the replication fork which had temporarily changed during replication had returned to the organization of its nonreplicating state.     

Changes in chromatin structure at the replication fork. DNase I and trypsin-micrococcal nuclease effects on approximately 300- and 150-base pair nascent DNAs

DNase I, trypsin, and micrococcal nuclease are used to further probe the structure of nascent deoxyribonucleoprotein (DNP) fractions which appear after in vivo 20-s pulse labeling of sea urchin embryos with [3H]thymidine. We present evidence that the large nascent DNP which protects the approximately 300-base pair large nascent DNA consists of at least one nucleosome core. This is based on fractionation in denaturing polyacrylamide gels of DNA extracted from large nascent DNP fractions of a micrococcal nuclease + DNase I digest of nuclei. The data also suggest the existence of a DNase I-hypersensitive site(s) within the large nascent DNP; this is consistent with the hypothesis that the latter consists of closely packed dinucleosome cores. Histone H1 and non-histone proteins do not account for the previously reported unusual hyperresistance of the large nascent DNA against micrococcal nuclease. The protection offered this approximately 300-base pair nascent DNA was not eliminated by an 0.2-microgram/ml trypsin pretreatment which removes the above proteins from the chromatin. However, 5-10 micrograms/ml of trypsin, which remove a portion of the NH2 termini of the four core histones of nucleosomes, eliminate the hyperresistance of the large nascent DNA to subsequent micrococcal nuclease digestion, while nascent and bulk monomer DNAs remain unaffected. This indicates histone-histone and/or histone-DNA interactions within the large nascent DNP which differ from those of nascent and bulk mononucleosome cores.     

Dispersive segregation of nucleosomes during replication of simian virus 40 chromosomes

The distribution of preformed ("old") histone octamers between the two arms of DNA replication forks was analyzed in simian virus 40(SV40)-infected cells following treatment with cycloheximide to prevent nucleosome assembly from nascent histones. Viral chromatin synthesized in the presence of cycloheximide was shown to be deficient in nucleosomes. Replicating SV40 DNA (wild-type 800 and capsid assembly mutant, tsB11) was radiolabeled in either intact cells or nuclear extracts supplemented with cytosol. Nascent nucleosomal monomers were then released by extensive digestion of isolated nuclei, nuclear extracts or isolated viral chromosomes with micrococcal nuclease. The labeled nucleosomal DNA was purified and found to hybridize to both strands of SV40 DNA restriction fragments taken from each side of the origin of DNA replication, whereas Okazaki fragments hybridized only to the strand representing the retrograde DNA template. In addition, isolated, replicating SV40 chromosomes were digested with two strand-specific exonucleases that excised nascent DNA from either the forward or the retrograde side of replication forks. Pretreatment of cells with cycloheximide did not result in an excess of prenucleosomal DNA on either side of replication forks, but did increase the amount of internucleosomal DNA. These data are consistent with a dispersive model for nucleosome segregation in which "old" histone octamers are distributed to both arms of DNA replication forks.     

Changes in chromatin structure at the replication fork. II The DNPs containing nascent DNA and a transient chromatin modification detected by DNAase I.

Discrete deoxyribonucleoproteins (DNPs) containing nascent and/or bulk DNA, were obtained by fractionating micrococcal nuclease digests of nuclei form 3H-thymidine pulse (15-20 sec) and 14C-thymidine long (16 h) labeled sea urchin embryos in polyacrylamide gels. One of these DNPs was shown to contain the micrococcal nuclease resistant 300 bp "large nascent DNA" described in Cell 14, 259-267, 1978. The bulk and nascent mononucleosome fractions provided evidence for the preferential digestion by micrococcal nuclease of nascent over bulk linker regions to yield mononucleosome cores with nascent DNA. DNAase I was used to probe whether any nascent DNA is in nucleosomes. Nascent as well as bulk single-stranded DNA fragments occurred in multiples of 10.4 bases with higher than random frequencies of certain fragment sizes (for instance 83 bases) as expected from a nucleosome structure. However, a striking background of nascent DNA between nascent DNA peaks was observed. This was eliminated by a pulse-chase treatment or by digestion of pulse-labeled nuclei with micrococcal nuclease together with DNAase I. One of several possible interpretations of these results suggests that a transient change in nucleosome structure may have created additional sites for the nicking of nascent DNA by DNAase I; the micrococcal nuclease sensitivity of the interpeak radioactivity suggest its origin from the linker region. Endogenous nuclease of sea urchin embryos cleaves chromatin DNA in a manner similar to that of DNAase I.     

Influence of histone acetylation on the solubility, H1 content and DNase I sensitivity of newly assembled chromatin.

In a previous report [Annunziato, A.T. and Seale, R.L. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258:12675] a novel intermediate in chromatin assembly was described (detected by labeling new DNA in the presence of the deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate), which retained approximately 50% of the heightened sensitivity of newly replicated chromatin to DNaseI. It is now reported that nucleosomes replicated in butyrate are considerably more soluble in the presence of magnesium, relative to chromatin replicated under control conditions, and that this heightened magnesium-solubility is reflected in a concomitant increase in the preferential solubility of nucleosomes containing newly synthesized core histones. This differential solubility was accompanied by a 5- to 6-fold depletion of histone H1, and was completely abolished by the selective removal of H1 from isolated nuclei. The removal of H1 also markedly reduced the preferential DNaseI sensitivity of chromatin replicated in butyrate. Further, when mononucleosomes of control and (acetylated) nascent chromatin were compared, no differences in DNaseI sensitivity were detected. These results provide evidence that the interactions between newly assembled nucleosomes and histone H1 are altered when histone deacetylation is inhibited during chromatin replication, and suggest a mechanism for the control of H1 deposition during nucleosome assembly in vivo.     

Cell lethality after selective irradiation of the DNA replication fork

Summary It has been suggested that nascent DNA located at the DNA replication fork may exhibit enhanced sensitivity to radiation damage. To evaluate this hypothesis, Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) were labeled with¹²⁵I-iododeoxyuridine (¹²⁵IUdR) either in the presence or absence of aphidicolin. Aphidicolin (5 µg/ml) reduced cellular¹²⁵IUdR incorporation to 3–5% of the control value. The residual¹²⁵I incorporation appeared to be restricted to low molecular weight (sub-replicon sized) fragments of DNA which were more sensitive to micrococcal nuclease attack and less sensitive to high salt DNase I digestion than randomly labeled DNA. These findings suggest that DNA replicated in the presence of aphidicolin remains localized at the replication fork adjacent to the nuclear matrix.Based on these observations an attempt was made to compare the lethal consequences of¹²⁵I decays at the replication fork to that of¹²⁵I decays randomly distributed over the entire genome. Regardless of the distribution of decay events, all treatment groups exhibited identical dose-response curves (D₀: 101¹²⁵I decays/cell). Since differential irradiation of the replication complex did not result in enhanced cell lethality, it can be concluded that neither the nascent DNA nor the protein components (replicative enzymes, nuclear protein matrix) associated with the DNA replication site constitute key radiosensitive targets within the cellular genome.     

Organization of the thyroid hormone receptor in the chromatin of C6 glial cells: Evidence that changes in receptor levels are not associated with changes in receptor distribution

The association of [¹²⁵I]T3-receptor complexes with C6 cell chromatin was analysed after a limited digestion with micrococcal nuclease (MN) or DNase I. Both nucleases solubilized up to 60–70% of receptor and 0.4 M KCl extracted 70%, of the non-digested receptor, thus showing that only a residual fraction of receptor is associated with the nuclear matrix. With DNase I the receptor was released 2–3-fold faster than the bulk of chromatin, whereas a preferential release of receptor over total chromatin was not observed with MN. The digestion of receptor with DNase I and MN occurred 14- and 6-fold faster, respectively, than the appearance of PCA-soluble chromatin. Preincubation for 48 h with 4 nM T3 of 2 mM butyrate significantly altered receptor levels but did not change sensitivity to the nucleases. These results suggest that the thyroid hormone receptor is associated with chromatin highly sensitive to nuclease digestion, and that changes in receptor number are not associated with changes in its distribution in chromatin.     

Studies on nuclease digestion of chromatin phosphorylated in vivo

We have previously shown that, by culturing cells in hypertonic media, histone 2A becomes hyperphosphorylated (Pantazis, P., West, M. H. P., and Bonner, W. M. (1984) Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 1186-1188). In the present study we have probed the effect of this histone modification on the overall chromatin structure by micrococcal nuclease and DNase I digestion. Although no significant quantitative differences in the extent of hydrolysis were observed between control and hyperphosphorylated chromatin by micrococcal nuclease, DNase I digested hyperphosphorylated chromatin at a 3- to 4-fold higher rate than unmodified chromatin.     

Evidence from ATP synthesis driven by a proton gradient in Methanosarcina barkeri.

Hepatoma Tissue Culture (HTC) cell nuclei were isolated from untreated cells and from cells treated with sodium butyrate to increase the levels of acetylated histone. Nuclei from sodium butyrate treated cells exhibited a dramatic increased rate of digestion with DNase I as compared to control cell nuclei. Micrococcal nuclease showed no preference for chromatin containing hyperacetylated histones.     

Digestion of insect chromatin with micrococcal nuclease, DNase I and DNase I combined with single-strand specific nuclease S1.

The chromatin of the lepidopteran Ephestia kuehniella was digested by micrococcal nuclease, DNase I and S1-nuclease combined with DNase I pretreatment. The resulting DNA fragments were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and compared with the DNA fragments of rat liver nuclei obtained by the same process. Extensive homology was revealed between insect and mammalian chromatin structure. The combined DNase I- S1-nuclease digestion yields double-stranded DNA fragments of lengths from 30 to 110 base-pairs. These DNA fragments are not obtained from nuclei predigested extensively with micrococcal nuclease. The results are discussed with respect to the internal structure of the chromatin subunit.     

Maturation of newly replicated chromatin of simian virus 40 and its host cell

The DNA in replicating simian virus 40 chromatin and cellular chromatin was labeled with short pulses of [³H]thymidine. The structure of pulse-labeled nucleoprotein complexes was studied by micrococcal nuclease digestion. It was found that in both newly replicated viral and cellular chromatin, a structural state appears which is characterized by an increased sensitivity to nuclease and a faster than usual rate of cleavage to DNA fragments of monomeric nucleosome size and smaller. Pulse-chase experiments show that each of these effects requires a characteristic time to disappear in both systems, suggesting the existence of different sub-processes of chromatin maturation. One of these processes, detectable by the reversion of the unusually fast production of subnucleosomal fragments, is delayed in SV40 chromatin replication.     

Closely spaced nucleosome cores in reconstituted histone.DNA complexes and histone-H1-depleted chromatin

It has been demonstrated by digestion studies with micrococcal nuclease that reconstitution of complexes from DNA and a mixture of the four small calf thymus histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 leads to subunits closely spaced in a 137 +/- 7-nucleotide-pair register. Subunits isolated from the reconstituted complex contain nearly equimolar amounts of the four histones and sediment at 11.6S. On DNase I digestion both the reconstituted complex and the separated subunits gave rise to series of single-stranded DNA fragments with a 10-nucleotide periodicity. This indicates that the reconstitution leads to subunits very similar to nucleosome cores. Nucleosome cores closely spaced in a 140-nucleotide-pair register were also obtained upon removal of histone H1 from chromatin by dissociation with 0.63 M NaCl and subsequent ultracentrifugation. In reconstitution experiments with all five histones (including histone H1) our procedure did not lead to tandemly arranged nucleosomes containing about 200 nucleotide pairs of DNA. In the presence of EDTA, DNase II cleaved calf thymus nuclei and chromatin at about 200-nucleotide-pair intervals whereas in the presence of Mg2+ cleavage at intervals of approximately half this size was observed. The change in the nature of the cleavage pattern, however, was no longer found after removal of histone H1 from chromatin. This indicates that H1 influences the accessibility of DNase II cleavage sites in chromatin. This finding is discussed with respect to the influence of histone H1 on chromatin superstructure.     

Nuclease sensitivity of active chromatin.

The active regions of chicken erythrocyte nuclei were labeled using the standard DNase I directed nick translation reaction. These nuclei were then used to study the characteristics and, in particular, the nuclease sensitivity of active genes. Although DNase I specifically attacks active genes, micrococcal nuclease solubilizes these regions to about the same degree as the total DNA. On the other hand micrococcal nuclease does selectively cut the internucleosomal regions of active genes resulting in the appearance of mononucleosomal fraction which is enriched in active gene DNA. A small percentage of the active chromatin is also released from the nucleus by low speed centrifugation following micrococcal nuclease treatment. The factors which make active genes sensitive to DNase I were shown to reside on individual nucleosomes from these regions. This was established by showing that isolated active mononucleosomes were preferentially sensitive to DNase I digestion. Although the high mobility group proteins are essential for the maintenance of DNase I sensitivity in active regions, these proteins are not necessary for the formation of the conformation which makes these genes preferentially accessible to micrococcal nuclease. The techniques employed in this paper enable one to study the chromatin structure of the entire population of actively expressed genes. Previous studies have elucidated the structure of a few special highly prevalent genes such as ovalbumin and hemoglobin. The results of this paper show that this special conformation is a general feature of all active genes irregardless of the extent of expression.     

Nucleosome segregation in chromatin replicated in the presence of cycloheximide

Ehrlich ascites tumour cells and L cells were grown in the presence of [¹⁴C]thymidine to label DNA replicated under normal conditions and were then cultured in the presence of cycloheximide and [³H]thymidine to label DNA replicated in the absence of histone synthesis, Chromatin from these cells was digested with micrococcal nuclease and with restriction endonuclease BspRI (an isoschizomer of HaeIII). The rates of digestion of the ¹⁴C-labelled and of the ³H-labelled DNA, and the size and buoyant density of the BspRI-generated chromatin fragments showed that: (1) chromatin replicated in the presence of cycloheximide contained half the normal amount of histones; (2) it did not contain long stretches of naked DNA; and (3) it was organized in nucleosomes distributed along DNA in groups of several particles separated by relatively short stretches of histone-free DNA. Control experiments showed that this could not be the result of a long-distance sliding of nucleosomes.These data suggest a bilateral mode of nucleosome segregation during DNA replication.     

Histone hyperacetylation facilitates chromatin remodelling in a Drosophila embryo cell-free system

We found that Drosophila embryo extract contains a protein activity (or activities) that can destabilize nucleosomes, resulting in increased sensitivity to DNase I, release of nucleosomal supercoiling, high levels of conformational flexibility of DNA and more diffuse micrococcal nuclease digestion patterns. Incorporation of histone H1 did not significantly affect this nucleosome remodelling. Remodelling occurs more efficiently in hyperacetylated chromatin. It was shown previously that hyperacetylated chromatin, reconstituted in a Drosophila embryo cell-free system, exhibits increased DNase I sensitivity and a high degree of conformational flexibility of DNA. The present data suggest that the more diffuse structure of acetylated chromatin is a result of chromatin remodelling by protein activities in the Drosophila embryo extract. Received: 4 November 1998 / Accepted: 10 May 1999     

Hydrodynamic shearing by VirTis blending conserves nucleosome structure of rat liver chromatin

The effects of VirTis shearing on chromatin subunit structure were investigated by enzymatic digestion, thermal denaturation, and electron microscopy. While initial rates of micrococcal nuclease and DNase I digestion were greater postshearing, limit digest values were similar to those for unsheared chromatin. Fractionated chromatin digestion kinetics varied with sedimentation. Digestion of all chromatins produced monomer and dimer DNA fragment lengths, but only unsheared chromatins exhibited higher order nucleosome oligomer lengths. Mononucleosomes and core particles were resolved in digests of sheared and gradient fractions analyzed by electrophoresis. All chromatins exposed to DNase I showed discrete 10-base pair nicking patterns. The presence of nucleosomes was confirmed by electron microscopy. Electron microscopy and histone content of gradient fractions showed that nucleosome density along the chromatin axis increased in rapidly sedimenting fractions. Thermal denaturation detected no appreciable generation of protein-free DNA fragments as a result of shearing. The results indicate that VirTis blending conserves subunit structure with loss of less than 12–15% of nucleosome structure.