The First Transmembrane Domain of the Hepatitis B Virus Large Envelope Protein Is Crucial for Infectivity

The early steps of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) life cycle are still poorly understood. Indeed, neither the virus receptor at the cell surface nor the mechanism by which nucleocapsids are delivered to the cytosol of infected cells has been identified. Extensive mutagenesis studies in pre-S1, pre-S2, and most of the S domain of envelope proteins revealed the presence of two regions essential for HBV infectivity: the 77 first residues of the pre-S1 domain and a conformational motif in the antigenic loop of the S domain. In addition, at the N-terminal extremity of the S domain, a putative fusion peptide, partially overlapping the first transmembrane (TM1) domain and preceded by a PEST sequence likely containing several proteolytic cleavage sites, was identified. Since no mutational analysis of these two motifs potentially implicated in the fusion process was performed, we decided to investigate the ability of viruses bearing contiguous deletions or substitutions in the putative fusion peptide and PEST sequence to infect HepaRG cells. By introducing the mutations either in the L and M proteins or in the S protein, we demonstrated the following: (i) that in the TM1 domain of the L protein, three hydrophobic clusters of four residues were necessary for infectivity; (ii) that the same clusters were critical for S protein expression; and, finally, (iii) that the PEST sequence was dispensable for both assembly and infection processes.The hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the main human pathogen responsible for severe hepatic diseases like cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Even though infection can be prevented by immunization with an efficient vaccine, about 2 billion people have been infected worldwide, resulting in 350 million chronic carriers that are prone to develop liver diseases (56). Current treatments consist either of the use of interferon α, which modulates antiviral defenses and controls infection in 30 to 40% of cases, or of the use of viral polymerase inhibitors that allow a stronger response to treatment but require long-term utilization and frequently lead to the outcome of resistant viruses (34, 55). A better understanding of the virus life cycle, and particularly of the mechanism by which the virus enters the cell, could provide background for therapeutics that inhibit the early steps of infection, as recently illustrated with the HBV pre-S1-derived entry inhibitor (25, 45).HBV belongs to the Hepadnaviridae family whose members infect different species. All viruses of this family share common properties. The capsid containing a partially double-stranded circular DNA genome is surrounded by a lipid envelope, in which two (in avihepadnaviruses infecting birds) or three (in orthohepadnaviruses infecting mammals) envelope proteins are embedded. A single open reading frame bearing several translation initiation sites encodes these surface proteins. Thus, the HBV envelope contains three proteins: S, M, and L that share the same C-terminal extremity corresponding to the small S protein that is crucial for virus assembly (7, 8, 46) and infectivity (1, 31, 53). These proteins are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), assembled, and secreted as particles through the Golgi apparatus (15, 42). The current model for the transmembrane structure of the S domain implies the luminal exposition of both N- and C-terminal extremities and the presence of four transmembrane (TM) domains: the TM1 and TM2 domains, both necessary for cotranslational protein integration into the ER membrane, and the TM3 and TM4 domains, located in the C-terminal third of the S domain (for a review, see reference 6). Among the four predicted TM domains, only the TM2 domain has a defined position between amino acids 80 and 98 of the S domain. The exact localization of the TM1 domain is still unclear, probably because of the relatively low hydrophobicity of its sequence, which contains polar residues and two prolines. The M protein corresponds to the S protein extended by an N-terminal domain of 55 amino acids called pre-S2. Its presence is dispensable for both assembly and infectivity (20, 21, 37). Finally, the L protein corresponds to the M protein extended by an N-terminal domain of 108 amino acids called pre-S1 (genotype D). The pre-S1 and pre-S2 domains of the L protein can be present either at the inner face of viral particles (on the cytoplasmic side of the ER), playing a crucial role in virus assembly (5, 8, 10, 11, 46), or on the outer face (on the luminal side of the ER), available for the interaction with target cells and necessary for viral infectivity (4, 14, 36). The pre-S translocation is independent from the M and S proteins and is driven by the L protein TM2 domain (33). Finally, HBV surface proteins are not only incorporated into virion envelopes but also spontaneously bud from ER-Golgi intermediate compartment membranes (30, 43) to form empty subviral particles (SVPs) that are released from the cell by secretion (8, 40).One approach to decipher viral entry is to interfere with the function of envelope proteins. Thus, by a mutagenesis approach, two envelope protein domains crucial for HBV infectivity have already been identified: (i) the 77 first amino acids of the pre-S1 domain (4, 36) including the myristic acid at the N-terminal extremity (9, 27) and (ii) possibly a cysteine motif in the luminal loop of the S domain (1, 31). In addition, a putative fusion peptide has been identified at the N-terminal extremity of the S domain due to its sequence homology with other viral fusion peptides (50). This sequence, either N-terminal in the S protein or internal in the L and M proteins, is conserved among the Hepadnaviridae family and shares common structural and functional properties with other fusion peptides (49, 50). Finally, a PEST sequence likely containing several proteolytic cleavage sites has been identified in the L and M proteins upstream of the TM1 domain (39). A cleavage within this sequence could activate the fusion peptide.In this study, we investigated whether the putative fusion peptide and the PEST sequence were necessary for the infection process. For this purpose, we constructed a set of mutant viruses bearing contiguous deletions in these regions and determined their infectivity using an in vitro infection model based on HepaRG cells (28). The introduction of mutations either in the L and M proteins or in only the S protein allowed us to demonstrate that, in the TM1 domain of L protein, three hydrophobic clusters not essential for viral assembly were crucial for HBV infectivity while their presence in the S protein was critical for envelope protein expression. In addition, we showed that the PEST sequence was clearly dispensable for both assembly and infection processes.     

Impaired Quality of the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)-Specific T-Cell Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-HBV Coinfection

Hepatits B virus (HBV)-specific T cells play a key role both in the control of HBV replication and in the pathogenesis of liver disease. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) coinfection and the presence or absence of HBV e (precore) antigen (HBeAg) significantly alter the natural history of chronic HBV infection. We examined the HBV-specific T-cell responses in treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative HIV-1-HBV-coinfected (n = 24) and HBV-monoinfected (n = 39) Asian patients. Peripheral blood was stimulated with an overlapping peptide library for the whole HBV genome, and tumor necrosis factor alpha and gamma interferon cytokine expression in CD8⁺ T cells was measured by intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. There was no difference in the overall magnitude of the HBV-specific T-cell responses, but the quality of the response was significantly impaired in HIV-1-HBV-coinfected patients compared with monoinfected patients. In coinfected patients, HBV-specific T cells rarely produced more than one cytokine and responded to fewer HBV proteins than in monoinfected patients. Overall, the frequency and quality of the HBV-specific T-cell responses increased with a higher CD4⁺ T-cell count (P = 0.018 and 0.032, respectively). There was no relationship between circulating HBV-specific T cells and liver damage as measured by activity and fibrosis scores, and the HBV-specific T-cell responses were not significantly different in patients with either HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative disease. The quality of the HBV-specific T-cell response is impaired in the setting of HIV-1-HBV coinfection and is related to the CD4⁺ T-cell count.There are 40 million people worldwide infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), and 6 to 15% of HIV-1-infected patients are also chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) (13, 20, 35, 38, 40-42, 47, 50, 61, 69). The highest rates of coinfection with HIV-1 and HBV are in Asia and Africa, where HBV is endemic (33, 68). Following the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), liver disease is now the major cause of non-AIDS-related deaths in HIV-1-infected patients (12, 13, 38, 59, 65).Coinfection of HBV with HIV-1 alters the natural history of HBV infection. Individuals with HIV-1-HBV coinfection seroconvert from HBV e (precore) antigen (HBeAg) to HBV e antibody less frequently and have higher HBV DNA levels but lower levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and milder necroinflammatory activity on histology than those infected with HBV alone (18, 26, 49). Progression to cirrhosis, however, seems to be more rapid and more common, and liver-related mortality is higher, in HIV-1-HBV coinfection than with either infection alone (47, 59). HBeAg is an accessory protein of HBV and is not required for viral replication or infection; however, chronic HBV infection typically is divided into two distinct phases: HBeAg positive and HBeAg negative (reviewed in reference 15). Most natural history studies of HIV-1-HBV coinfection to date have primarily focused on HBeAg-positive patients from non-Asian countries (23, 44, 46).We previously developed an overlapping peptide library for the HBV genome to detect HBV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses to all HBV gene products from multiple HBV genotypes (17). In a small cross-sectional study of patients recruited in Australia, we found that in coinfected patients, HBV-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses, as measured by gamma interferon (IFN-γ) production, were diminished compared to those seen in HBV-monoinfected patients (17). However, patients had varying lengths of exposure to anti-HBV-active HAART at the time of analysis. In this study, therefore, we aimed to characterize the HBV-specific T-cell response in untreated HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative HIV-1-HBV-coinfected patients and to determine the relationship between the HBV-specific immune response, HBeAg status, and liver disease.     

The Pre-S1 and Antigenic Loop Infectivity Determinants of the Hepatitis B Virus Envelope Proteins Are Functionally Independent

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) envelope proteins bear two determinants of viral entry: a receptor-binding site (RBS) in the pre-S1 domain of the large envelope protein and a conformation-dependent determinant, of unknown function, in the antigenic loop (AGL) of the small, middle, and large envelope proteins. Using an in vitro infection assay consisting of susceptible HepaRG cells and the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) as a surrogate of HBV, we first investigated whether subelements of the pre-S1 determinant (amino acids 2 to 75), i.e., the N-terminal myristoyl anchor, subdomain 2-48 (RBS), and subdomain 49-75, were functionally separable. In transcomplementation experiments, coexpression of two distinct infectivity-deficient pre-S1 mutants at the surface of HDV virions failed to restore infectivity, indicating that the myristoyl anchor, the 2-48 RBS, and the 49-75 sequence, likely cooperate in cis at viral entry. Furthermore, we showed that as much as 52% of total pre-S1 in the HDV envelope could bear infectivity-deficient lesions without affecting entry, indicating that a small number of pre-S1 polypeptides—estimated at three to four per virion—is sufficient for infectivity. We next investigated the AGL activity in the small or large envelope protein background (S- and L-AGL, respectively) and found that lesions in S-AGL were more deleterious to infectivity than in L-AGL, a difference that reflects the relative stoichiometry of the small and large envelope proteins in the viral envelope. Finally, we showed that C147S, an AGL infectivity-deficient substitution, exerted a dominant-negative effect on infectivity, likely reflecting an involvement of C147 in intermolecular disulfide bonds.Hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a major public health concern worldwide, affecting more than 350 millions of chronically infected individuals. Since the discovery of HBV, substantial information has been gathered on the viral replication cycle, but our understanding of the viral entry mechanism remains limited, and the identity of the receptor(s) for HBV is still unknown (15). HBV displays a very narrow host range, which is likely determined at viral entry by a highly specific interaction between the HBV envelope proteins and receptors at the surface of human hepatocytes. The envelope proteins designated large (L-HBsAg), middle (M-HBsAg), and small (S-HBsAg) are membrane-spanning glycoproteins that differ from each other by the size of their N-terminal ectodomain (21). L-HBsAg contains a N-terminal pre-S1, central pre-S2, and C-terminal S domains. M-HBsAg is shorter than L-HBsAg in lacking pre-S1, whereas S-HBsAg consists of the S domain only (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Envelope protein synthesis occurs at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Empty subviral particles (SVPs) assemble from aggregates at a pre-Golgi membrane and exit the cell through the secretory pathway (36). Assembly of mature HBV virions requires, in addition to S-HBsAg, the presence of L-HBsAg as a matrix protein for nucleocapsid envelopment (6). Recent findings indicate that HBV virions and SVPs follow distinct pathways for budding: the late endosomal multivesicular bodies (MVBs) for HBV virions, and the MVB-independent secretory pathway for SVPs (26, 28, 46). The HBV envelope proteins can also package the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) ribonucleoprotein (RNP), in case of HBV/HDV coinfection (5, 45), leading to the formation of HDV virions. Whether HDV uses the SVP secretion pathway rather than an MVB-dependent route is uncertain.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic representation of HBV envelope proteins. The topology of the L-, M-, and S-HBsAg proteins at the viral membrane is represented. The pre-S2 domain of L- and M-HBsAg, and the determinants of viral entry, pre-S1 and AGL, are indicated. The M-HBsAg protein, represented in gray, is dispensable for infectivity. The myristic acid (Myr) linked to the L-HBsAg N terminus is indicated (closed box). Subdomains 2-48 and 49-75 of the pre-S1 infectivity determinant are indicated. Open boxes represent transmembrane regions in the S domain.L-HBsAg, but not M-HBsAg, is crucial to infectivity of both HBV and HDV particles (13, 31, 41, 42). L-HBsAg contains a major infectivity determinant located between amino acid residues 2 and 75 of its N-terminal pre-S1 domain (4, 30), including a myristoyl anchor linked to glycine-2 (1, 8, 18), a putative receptor binding site (RBS) between positions 2 and 48, and a domain of unknown function between amino acids 49 and 75. To date, the most compelling evidence that pre-S1 mediates receptor binding comes from studies demonstrating that myristoylated synthetic peptides specific for the N-terminal 2-to-48 pre-S1 domain can bind to hepatocyte plasma membranes and block infection in vitro (3, 16, 17) and in vivo (37). Beside pre-S1, a second determinant was recently identified in the antigenic loop (AGL) borne by the three HBV envelope proteins (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The AGL participation in viral entry was first established in the HDV model (23) and more recently directly in the HBV model (39). Interestingly, serine substitutions for the AGL cysteine residues, which prove detrimental to the conserved immunodominant “a” determinant, could also block viral entry. Note that the “a” determinant consists in conformational epitopes, which elicit highly neutralizing antibodies (22). Infectivity and the “a” determinant were also lost when virions were treated with membrane-impermeable inhibitors of thiol/disulfide isomerization (2). These findings clearly established a correlation between the AGL cysteine disulfide bonds network, the conformation of the “a” determinant, and infectivity. Hence, the strict conservation of the “a” determinant among all HBV genotypes is related to the AGL function at viral entry. The AGL determinant may operate in association with, or independently of pre-S1, in binding to receptors at the early step of entry and/or in the mechanism of envelope disassembly postentry.In the present study, we investigated the pre-S1 determinant by performing transcomplementation experiments between mutants of 3 pre-S1 subelements: the myristoyl anchor, subdomain 2-48, and subdomain 49-75. We analyzed the activity of the AGL determinant in the S- or L-HBsAg background (S- and L-AGL, respectively), and we examined the effect of introducing increasing amounts of infectivity-deficient pre-S1, or AGL, in the virion''s envelope on infectivity.     

African Swine Fever Virus Protein p17 Is Essential for the Progression of Viral Membrane Precursors toward Icosahedral Intermediates

The first morphological evidence of African swine fever virus (ASFV) assembly is the appearance of precursor viral membranes, thought to derive from the endoplasmic reticulum, within the assembly sites. We have shown previously that protein p54, a viral structural integral membrane protein, is essential for the generation of the viral precursor membranes. In this report, we study the role of protein p17, an abundant transmembrane protein localized at the viral internal envelope, in these processes. Using an inducible virus for this protein, we show that p17 is essential for virus viability and that its repression blocks the proteolytic processing of polyproteins pp220 and pp62. Electron microscopy analyses demonstrate that when the infection occurs under restrictive conditions, viral morphogenesis is blocked at an early stage, immediately posterior to the formation of the viral precursor membranes, indicating that protein p17 is required to allow their progression toward icosahedral particles. Thus, the absence of this protein leads to an accumulation of these precursors and to the delocalization of the major components of the capsid and core shell domains. The study of ultrathin serial sections from cells infected with BA71V or the inducible virus under permissive conditions revealed the presence of large helicoidal structures from which immature particles are produced, suggesting that these helicoidal structures represent a previously undetected viral intermediate.African swine fever virus (ASFV) (61, 72) is the only known DNA-containing arbovirus and the sole member of the Asfarviridae family (24). Infection by this virus of its natural hosts, the wild swine warthogs and bushpigs and the argasid ticks of the genus Ornithodoros, results in a mild disease, often asymptomatic, with low viremia titers, that in many cases develops into a persistent infection (3, 43, 71). In contrast, infection of domestic pigs leads to a lethal hemorrhagic fever for which the only available methods of disease control are the quarantine of the affected area and the elimination of the infected animals (51).The ASFV genome is a lineal molecule of double-stranded DNA of 170 to 190 kbp in length with convalently closed ends and terminal inverted repeats. The genome encodes more than 150 open reading frames, half of which lack any known or predictable function (16, 75).The virus particle, with an overall icosahedral shape and an average diameter of 200 nm (11), is organized in several concentric layers (6, 11, 15) containing more than 50 structural proteins (29). Intracellular particles are formed by an inner viral core, which contains the central nucleoid surrounded by a thick protein coat, referred to as core shell. This core is enwrapped by an inner lipid envelope (7, 34) on top of which the icosahedral capsid is assembled (26, 27, 31). Extracellular virions possess an additional membrane acquired during the budding from the plasma membrane (11). Both forms of the virus, intracellular and extracellular, are infective (8).The assembly of ASFV particles occurs in the cytoplasm of the infected cell, in viral factories located close to the cell nucleus (6, 13, 49). ASFV factories possess several characteristics similar to those of the cellular aggresomes (35), which are accumulations of aggregates of cellular proteins that form perinuclear inclusions (44).Current models propose that ASFV assembly begins with the modification of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes, which are subsequently recruited to the viral factories and transformed into viral precursor membranes. These ER-derived viral membranes represent the precursors of the inner viral envelope and are the first morphological evidence of viral assembly (7, 60). ASFV viral membrane precursors evolve into icosahedral intermediates and icosahedral particles by the progressive assembly of the outer capsid layer at the convex face of the precursor membranes (5, 26, 27, 31) through an ATP- and calcium-dependent process (19). At the same time, the core shell is formed underneath the concave face of the viral envelope, and the viral DNA and nucleoproteins are packaged and condensed to form the innermost electron-dense nucleoid (6, 9, 12, 69). However, the assembly of the capsid and the internal envelope appears to be largely independent of the components of the core of the particle, since the absence of the viral polyprotein pp220 during assembly produces empty virus-like particles that do not contain the core (9).Comparative genome analysis suggests that ASFV shares a common origin with the members of the proposed nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs) (40, 41). The reconstructed phylogeny of NCLDVs as well as the similitude in the structures and organizations of the genomes indicates that ASFV is more closely related to poxviruses than to other members of the NCLDVs. A consensus about the origin and nature of the envelope of the immature form of vaccinia virus (VV), the prototypical poxvirus, seems to be emerging (10, 17, 20, 54). VV assembly starts with the appearance of crescent-shaped structures within specialized regions of the cytoplasm also known as viral factories (21, 23). The crescent membranes originate from preexisting membranes derived from some specialized compartment of the ER (32, 37, 52, 53, 67), and an operative pathway from the ER to the crescent membrane has recently been described (38, 39). VV crescents apparently grow in length while maintaining the same curvature until they become closed circles, spheres in three dimensions, called immature virions (IV) (22). The uniform curvature is produced by a honeycomb lattice of protein D13L (36, 70), which attaches rapidly to the membranes so that nascent viral membranes always appear to be coated over their entirety. The D13L protein is evolutionarily related to the capsid proteins of the other members of the NCLDV group, including ASFV, but lacks the C-terminal jelly roll motif (40). This structural difference is probably related to the fact that poxviruses are the only member of this group without an icosahedral capsid; instead, the spherical D13L coat acts as a scaffold during the IV stage but is discarded in subsequent steps of morphogenesis (10, 28, 46, 66). Thus, although crescents in VV and precursors of the inner envelope in ASFV are the first morphogenetic stages discernible in the viral factories of these viruses, they seem to be different in nature. Crescents are covered by the D13L protein and are more akin to the icosahedral intermediates of ASFV assembly, whereas ASFV viral membrane precursors are more similar to the naked membranes seen when VV morphogenesis is arrested by rifampin treatment (33, 47, 48, 50) or when the expression of the D13L and A17L proteins are repressed during infection with lethal conditional VV viruses (45, 55, 56, 68, 74, 76).Although available evidence strongly supports the reticular origin of the ASFV inner envelope (7, 60), the mechanism of acquisition remains unknown, and the number of membranes present in the inner envelope is controversial. The traditional view of the inner envelope as formed by two tightly opposed membranes derived from ER collapsed cisternae (7, 59, 60) has recently been challenged by the careful examination of the width of the internal membrane of viral particles and the single outer mitochondrial membrane, carried out using chemical fixation, cryosectioning, and high-pressure freezing (34). The results suggest that the inner envelope of ASFV is a single lipid bilayer, which raises the question of how such a structure can be generated and stabilized in the precursors of the ASFV internal envelope. In the case of VV, the coat of the D13L protein has been suggested to play a key role in the stabilization of the single membrane structure of the crescent (10, 17, 36), but the ASFV capsid protein p72 is not a component of the viral membrane precursors. The identification and functional characterization of the proteins involved in the generation of these structures are essential for the understanding of the mechanisms involved in these early stages of viral assembly. For this reason, we are focusing our interest on the study of abundant structural membrane proteins that reside at the inner envelope of the viral particle. We have shown previously that one of these proteins, p54, is essential for the recruitment of ER membranes to the viral factory (59). Repression of protein p54 expression has a profound impact on virus production and leads to an early arrest in virion morphogenesis, resulting in the virtual absence of membranes in the viral factory.Protein p17, encoded by the late gene D117L in the BA71V strain, is an abundant structural protein (60, 65). Its sequence, which is highly conserved among ASFV isolates (16), does not show any significant similarity with the sequences present in the databases. Protein p17 is an integral membrane protein (18) that is predicted to insert in membranes with a Singer type I topology and has been localized in the envelope precursors as well as in both intracellular and extracellular mature particles (60), suggesting that it resides at the internal envelope, the only membranous structure of the intracellular particles.In this work, we analyze the role of protein p17 in viral assembly by means of an IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside)-dependent lethal conditional virus. The data presented indicate that protein p17 is essential for viral morphogenesis. The repression of this protein appears to block assembly at the level of viral precursor membranes, resulting in their accumulation at the viral factory.From the electron microscopy analysis of serial sections of viral factories at very early times during morphogenesis, we present experimental evidence that suggests that, during assembly, viral precursor membranes and core material organize into large helicoidal intermediates from which icosahedral particles emerge. The possible role of these structures during ASFV morphogenesis is discussed.     

Hepatitis B Virus Replication and Release Are Independent of Core Lysine Ubiquitination

Ubiquitin conjugation to lysine residues regulates a variety of protein functions, including endosomal trafficking and degradation. While ubiquitin plays an important role in the release of many viruses, the requirement for direct ubiquitin conjugation to viral structural proteins is less well understood. Some viral structural proteins require ubiquitin ligase activity, but not ubiquitin conjugation, for efficient release. Recent evidence has shown that, like other viruses, hepatitis B virus (HBV) requires a ubiquitin ligase for release from the infected cell. The HBV core protein contains two lysine residues (K7 and K96), and K96 has been suggested to function as a potential ubiquitin acceptor site based on the fact that previous studies have shown that mutation of this amino acid to alanine blocks HBV release. We therefore reexamined the potential connection between core lysine ubiquitination and HBV replication, protein trafficking, and virion release. In contrast to alanine substitution, we found that mutation of K96 to arginine, which compared to alanine is more conserved but also cannot mediate ubiquitin conjugation, does not affect either virus replication or virion release. We also found that the core lysine mutants display wild-type sensitivity to the antiviral activity of interferon, which demonstrates that ubiquitination of core lysines does not mediate the interferon-induced disruption of HBV capsids. However, mutation of K96 to arginine alters the nuclear-cytoplasmic distribution of core, leading to an accumulation in the nucleolus. In summary, these studies demonstrate that although ubiquitin may regulate the HBV replication cycle, these mechanisms function independently of direct lysine ubiquitination of core protein.The hepatitis B virus (HBV) particle consists of an enveloped nucleocapsid that contains the viral polymerase (Pol) and an incomplete 3.2-kb double-stranded DNA genome (9). In the cytoplasm, the viral core structural proteins interact to form homodimers, which further self-assemble into capsid particles that package Pol and the viral pregenomic RNA. Encapsidated Pol subsequently reverse transcribes pregenomic RNA to give rise to mature double-stranded relaxed circular DNA-containing capsids. HBV DNA-containing capsids are released from the cell as mature virions after acquiring an envelope consisting of cellular membrane lipids and the viral small, middle, and large envelope proteins (4, 9, 41). Due to the directed insertion of the envelope proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi membrane, and the requirement of the large envelope protein for virion release, nucleocapsids are hypothesized to bud at intracellular membranes for release through the constitutive secretory pathway (5). Although the mechanism and site of HBV nucleocapsid envelopment and release remain poorly understood, emerging evidence indicates that the cellular ubiquitin pathway may play a role in this process.Structural proteins of some enveloped RNA viruses contain highly conserved sequences [PPXY, P(T/S)AP, and YPXL] termed late (L) domains that mediate interactions with proteins of the endocytic pathway to facilitate virus budding and release (1). The P(T/S)AP motif binds Tsg101 (8, 10, 19, 27, 47), a key ESCRT (for endosomal sorting complex required for transport) component for the recognition and sorting of ubiquitinated proteins to internal vesicles of the multivesicular body (MVB), while the YPXL motif binds Alix, an ESCRT-associated protein (26, 44, 48). The PPXY motif binds proteins of the Nedd4 family ubiquitin ligases, which are responsible for ubiquitination of proteins targeted for endocytosis and sorting to the MVB (20), suggesting a link between ubiquitin and viral budding (3, 16, 17, 22, 43, 55). The observation that proteasome inhibition, which depletes free cellular ubiquitin by interfering with ubiquitin recycling, results in a viral budding defect similar to that seen in virus L domain mutants further supports the implication that ubiquitin plays a role in mediating virion release (15, 31, 40, 43). Furthermore, fusion of ubiquitin to the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) PPPY-containing Gag protein and the equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) Gag protein containing a heterologous PTAP or PPPY motif rescues the virus-like particle release defect induced by proteasome inhibition (18, 31). While the role of L domains in mediating virion release is relatively well established, it remains unclear whether direct ubiquitination of viral structural proteins is generally required for virion release. Mutation of ubiquitin acceptor lysine residues in the RSV Gag protein inhibits virus budding, but such mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) or murine leukemia virus Gag protein exert no effect on virus release (29, 42). Recently, a retroviral (i.e., prototypic foamy virus) Gag protein engineered to lack ubiquitin acceptor lysines and encoding either the PSAP or PPXY motif of the L domain displayed no defect in viruslike particle release (58). Altogether, these results suggest that recruitment of host proteins to the L domain and ubiquitination of interacting proteins, but not the viral structural proteins, is required for ubiquitin-dependent virion release, at least for some viruses.The HBV core structural protein contains two potential ubiquitin acceptor lysine residues (K7 and K96) and an L-domain-like PPAY motif (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). Structural studies indicate that residue K96 and the PPAY motif may be exposed on the surface of HBV capsid particles, at least transiently (4, 32, 37). Studies aimed at identifying interaction factors important for HBV particle release demonstrated a number of interesting findings. First, γ2-adaptin, a cellular trafficking adaptor that contains a ubiquitin-interacting motif (UIM), interacts with both the viral large envelope protein and HBV core, and disruption of the HBV/γ2-adaptin interaction inhibits virus secretion (14, 39). Second, core protein interacts with the Nedd4 ubiquitin ligase through the PPAY motif in core (39). Mutation of the tyrosine in the PPAY motif results in disrupted binding of Nedd4, and overexpression of a catalytically inactive Nedd4 mutant inhibits HBV particle secretion (39). Third, mutation of core K96, but not K7, to alanine results in a defective release phenotype, suggesting that K96 may serve as a ubiquitin conjugation site that aids virion release (32, 39). Recently, overexpression of dominant-negative proteins of the MVB machinery, such as the Vps4 ATPases and the ESCRT-III complex-forming CHMP proteins, were also shown to disrupt HBV budding and virion release, while subviral particles comprised only of envelope proteins were released efficiently (21, 24, 49). This suggests that nucleocapsids may release from the cell by a mechanism distinct from constitutive secretion. These studies show that similar to RNA viruses, HBV utilizes components of the cellular protein trafficking machinery to mediate virion release.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Generation of core lysine mutants. (A) The 21-kDa HBV core structural protein contains two lysine residues at positions 7 and 96 that serve as potential ubiquitin conjugation sites. These residues are highly conserved among the four major HBV genotypes (6). Core contains a late-domain-like PPXY motif that serves as a binding site for the Nedd4 E3 ubiquitin ligase. Core additionally contains a potential noncanonical SUMOylation motif at position 96. (B) Lysine mutations were generated by site-directed mutagenesis in the core gene contained within the HBV genome under the control of a CMV promoter. K7R contains a lysine-to-arginine mutation at position 7, K96R contains a lysine-to-arginine mutation at position 96, K96A contains a lysine-to-alanine mutation at position 96, and K7R/K96R contains arginine substituted at position 7 and position 96.Although these findings imply that core ubiquitination may be necessary for HBV particle release, direct evidence of core ubiquitination has been elusive (33, 39; unpublished results). As suggested by previous Gag lysine mutagenesis studies, however, ubiquitin may instead indirectly be required through conjugation to an interacting protein that is essential for mediating HBV release (29, 58). Although core K7 and K96 have been previously assayed in the context of virion release by mutation of the lysine residues to alanine (32, 39), we expanded these studies by assaying core mutants with an arginine substitution at position K7 (K7R) and K96 (K96R), as well as a double lysine-to-arginine mutation (K7R/K96R). Compared to alanine, arginine serves as a more conserved mutation for lysine while still abolishing the potential ubiquitin conjugation site. In the present study, we utilized these mutants to comprehensively examine the role of the core lysines in HBV virus release, the formation of replication intermediates, intracellular localization of core, and the interferon (IFN)-mediated antiviral response.     

Ectromelia Virus Inhibitor of Complement Enzymes Protects Intracellular Mature Virus and Infected Cells from Mouse Complement

Poxviruses produce complement regulatory proteins to subvert the host''s immune response. Similar to the human pathogen variola virus, ectromelia virus has a limited host range and provides a mouse model where the virus and the host''s immune response have coevolved. We previously demonstrated that multiple components (C3, C4, and factor B) of the classical and alternative pathways are required to survive ectromelia virus infection. Complement''s role in the innate and adaptive immune responses likely drove the evolution of a virus-encoded virulence factor that regulates complement activation. In this study, we characterized the ectromelia virus inhibitor of complement enzymes (EMICE). Recombinant EMICE regulated complement activation on the surface of CHO cells, and it protected complement-sensitive intracellular mature virions (IMV) from neutralization in vitro. It accomplished this by serving as a cofactor for the inactivation of C3b and C4b and by dissociating the catalytic domain of the classical pathway C3 convertase. Infected murine cells initiated synthesis of EMICE within 4 to 6 h postinoculation. The levels were sufficient in the supernatant to protect the IMV, upon release, from complement-mediated neutralization. EMICE on the surface of infected murine cells also reduced complement activation by the alternative pathway. In contrast, classical pathway activation by high-titer antibody overwhelmed EMICE''s regulatory capacity. These results suggest that EMICE''s role is early during infection when it counteracts the innate immune response. In summary, ectromelia virus produced EMICE within a few hours of an infection, and EMICE in turn decreased complement activation on IMV and infected cells.Poxviruses encode in their large double-stranded DNA genomes many factors that modify the immune system (30, 56). The analysis of these molecules has revealed a delicate balance between viral pathogenesis and the host''s immune response (2, 21, 31, 61). Variola, vaccinia, monkeypox, cowpox, and ectromelia (ECTV) viruses each produce an orthologous complement regulatory protein (poxviral inhibitor of complement enzymes [PICE]) that has structural and functional homology to host proteins (14, 29, 34, 38, 41, 45, 54). The loss of the regulatory protein resulted in smaller local lesions with vaccinia virus lacking the vaccinia virus complement control protein (VCP) (29) and in a greater local inflammatory response in the case of cowpox lacking the inflammation-modulatory protein (IMP; the cowpox virus PICE) (35, 45, 46). Additionally, the complete loss of the monkeypox virus inhibitor of complement enzymes (MOPICE) may account for part of the reduced mortality observed in the West African compared to Congo basin strains of monkeypox virus (12).The complement system consists of proteins on the cell surface and in blood that recognize and destroy invading pathogens and infected host cells (36, 52). Viruses protect themselves from the antiviral effects of complement activation in a variety of ways, including hijacking the host''s complement regulatory proteins or producing their own inhibitors (7, 8, 15, 20, 23). Another effective strategy is to incorporate the host''s complement regulators in the outermost viral membrane, which then protects the virus from complement attack (62). The extracellular enveloped virus (EEV) produced by poxviruses acquires a unique outer membrane derived from the Golgi complex or early endosomes that contain the protective host complement regulators (58, 62). Poxviruses have multiple infectious forms, and the most abundant, intracellular mature virions (IMV), are released when infected cells lyse (58). The IMV lacks the outermost membrane found on EEV and is sensitive to complement-mediated neutralization. The multiple strategies viruses have evolved to evade the complement system underscore its importance to innate and adaptive immunity (15, 36).The most well-characterized PICE is VCP (24-29, 34, 49, 50, 53, 55, 59, 60). Originally described as a secreted complement inhibitor (34), VCP also attaches to the surface of infected cells through an interaction with the viral membrane protein A56 that requires an unpaired N-terminal cysteine (26). This extra cysteine also adds to the potency of the inhibitor by forming function-enhancing dimers (41). VCP and the smallpox virus inhibitor of complement enzymes (SPICE) bind heparin in vitro, and this may facilitate cell surface interactions (24, 38, 50, 59). The coevolution of variola virus with its only natural host, humans, likely explains the enhanced activity against human complement observed with SPICE compared to the other PICEs (54, 64).Our recent work with ECTV, the causative agent of mousepox infection, demonstrated that the classical and alternative pathways of the complement system are required for host survival (48). The mouse-specific pathogen ECTV causes severe disease in most strains and has coevolved with its natural host, analogous to variola virus in humans (9). This close host-virus relationship is particularly important for evaluating the role of the complement system, given the species specificity of many complement proteins, receptors, and regulators (10, 47, 62). Additionally, the availability of complement-deficient mice permits dissection of the complement activation pathways involved. Naïve C57BL/6 mouse serum neutralizes the IMV of ECTV in vitro, predominately through opsonization (48). Maximal neutralization requires natural antibody, classical-pathway activation, and amplification by the alternative pathway. C3 deficiency in the normally resistant C57BL/6 strain results in acute mortality, similar to immunodeficiencies in important elements of the antiviral immune response, including CD8⁺ T cells (19, 32), natural killer cells (18, 51), and gamma interferon (33). During ECTV infection, the complement system acts in the first few hours and days to delay the spread of infection, resulting in lower levels of viremia and viral burden in tissues (48).This study characterized the PICE produced by ECTV, ectromelia virus inhibitor of complement enzymes (EMICE), and assessed its complement regulatory activity. Recombinant EMICE (rEMICE) decreased activation of both human and mouse complement. Murine cells produced EMICE at 4 to 6 h postinfection prior to the release of the majority of the complement-sensitive IMV from infected cells. rEMICE protected ECTV IMV from complement-mediated neutralization. Further, EMICE produced during natural infection inhibited complement deposition on infected cells by the alternative pathway. ECTV likely produces this abundance of EMICE to protect both the IMV and infected cells.     

Characterization of Lassa Virus Glycoprotein Oligomerization and Influence of Cholesterol on Virus Replication

Mature glycoprotein spikes are inserted in the Lassa virus envelope and consist of the distal subunit GP-1, the transmembrane-spanning subunit GP-2, and the signal peptide, which originate from the precursor glycoprotein pre-GP-C by proteolytic processing. In this study, we analyzed the oligomeric structure of the viral surface glycoprotein. Chemical cross-linking studies of mature glycoprotein spikes from purified virus revealed the formation of trimers. Interestingly, sucrose density gradient analysis of cellularly expressed glycoprotein showed that in contrast to trimeric mature glycoprotein complexes, the noncleaved glycoprotein forms monomers and oligomers spanning a wide size range, indicating that maturation cleavage of GP by the cellular subtilase SKI-1/S1P is critical for formation of the correct oligomeric state. To shed light on a potential relation between cholesterol and GP trimer stability, we performed cholesterol depletion experiments. Although depletion of cholesterol had no effect on trimerization of the glycoprotein spike complex, our studies revealed that the cholesterol content of the viral envelope is important for the infectivity of Lassa virus. Analyses of the distribution of viral proteins in cholesterol-rich detergent-resistant membrane areas showed that Lassa virus buds from membrane areas other than those responsible for impaired infectivity due to cholesterol depletion of lipid rafts. Thus, derivation of the viral envelope from cholesterol-rich membrane areas is not a prerequisite for the impact of cholesterol on virus infectivity.Lassa virus (LASV) is a member of the family Arenaviridae, of which Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) is the prototype. Arenaviruses comprise more than 20 species, divided into the Old World and New World virus complexes (19). The Old World arenaviruses include the human pathogenic LASV strains, Lujo virus, which was first identified in late 2008 and is associated with an unprecedented high case fatality rate in humans, the nonhuman pathogenic Ippy, Mobala, and Mopeia viruses, and the recently described Kodoko virus (10, 30, 49). The New World virus complex contains, among others, the South American hemorrhagic fever-causing viruses Junín virus, Machupo virus, Guanarito virus, Sabiá virus, and the recently discovered Chapare virus (22).Arenaviruses contain a bisegmented single-stranded RNA genome encoding the polymerase L, matrix protein Z, nucleoprotein NP, and glycoprotein GP. The bipartite ribonucleoprotein of LASV is surrounded by a lipid envelope derived from the plasma membrane of the host cell. The matrix protein Z has been identified as a major budding factor, which lines the interior of the viral lipid membrane, in which GP spikes are inserted (61, 75). The glycoprotein is synthesized as precursor protein pre-GP-C and is cotranslationally cleaved by signal peptidase into GP-C and the signal peptide, which exhibits unusual length, stability, and topology (3, 27, 28, 33, 70, 87). Moreover, the arenaviral signal peptide functions as trans-acting maturation factor (2, 26, 33). After processing by signal peptidase, GP-C of both New World and Old World arenaviruses is cleaved by the cellular subtilase subtilisin kexin isozyme-1/site-1 protease (SKI-1/S1P) into the distal subunit GP-1 and the membrane-anchored subunit GP-2 within the secretory pathway (5, 52, 63). For LCMV, it has been shown that GP-1 subunits are linked to each other by disulfide bonds and are noncovalently connected to GP-2 subunits (14, 24, 31). GP-1 is responsible for binding to the host cell receptor, while GP-2 mediates fusion between the virus envelope and the endosomal membrane at low pH due to a bipartite fusion peptide near the amino terminus (24, 36, 44). Sequence analysis of the LCMV GP-2 ectodomain revealed two heptad repeats that most likely form amphipathic helices important for this process (34, 86).In general, viral class I fusion proteins have triplets of α-helical structures in common, which contain heptad repeats (47, 73). In contrast, class II fusion proteins are characterized by β-sheets that form dimers in the prefusion status and trimers in the postfusion status (43). The class III fusion proteins are trimers that, unlike class I fusion proteins, were not proteolytically processed N-terminally of the fusion peptide, resulting in a fusion-active membrane-anchored subunit (39, 62). Previous studies with LCMV described a tetrameric organization of the glycoprotein spikes (14), while more recent data using a bacterially expressed truncated ectodomain of the LCMV GP-2 subunit pointed toward a trimeric spike structure (31). Due to these conflicting data regarding the oligomerization status of LCMV GP, it remains unclear to which class of fusion proteins the arenaviral glycoproteins belong.The state of oligomerization and the correct conformation of viral glycoproteins are crucial for membrane fusion during virus entry. The early steps of infection have been shown for several viruses to be dependent on the cholesterol content of the participating membranes (i.e., either the virus envelope or the host cell membrane) (4, 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, 40, 42, 53, 56, 76, 78, 79). In fact, it has been shown previously that entry of both LASV and LCMV is susceptible to cholesterol depletion of the target host cell membrane using methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) treatment (64, 71). Moreover, cholesterol not only plays an important role in the early steps during entry in the viral life cycle but also is critical in the virus assembly and release process. Several viruses of various families, including influenza virus, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), measles virus, and Ebola virus, use the ordered environment of lipid raft microdomains. Due to their high levels of glycosphingolipids and cholesterol, these domains are characterized by insolubility in nonionic detergents under cold conditions (60, 72). Recent observations have suggested that budding of the New World arenavirus Junin virus occurs from detergent-soluble membrane areas (1). Assembly and release from distinct membrane microdomains that are detergent soluble have also been described for vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (12, 38, 68). At present, however, it is not known whether LASV requires cholesterol in its viral envelope for successful virus entry or whether specific membrane microdomains are important for LASV assembly and release.In this study, we first investigated the oligomeric state of the premature and mature LASV glycoprotein complexes. Since it has been shown for several membrane proteins that the oligomerization and conformation are dependent on cholesterol (58, 59, 76, 78), we further analyzed the dependence of the cholesterol content of the virus envelope on glycoprotein oligomerization and virus infectivity. Finally, we characterized the lipid membrane areas from which LASV is released.     

Conserved Motifs within Ebola and Marburg Virus VP40 Proteins Are Important for Stability,Localization, and Subsequent Budding of Virus-Like Particles

The filovirus VP40 protein is capable of budding from mammalian cells in the form of virus-like particles (VLPs) that are morphologically indistinguishable from infectious virions. Ebola virus VP40 (eVP40) contains well-characterized overlapping L domains, which play a key role in mediating efficient virus egress. L domains represent only one component required for efficient budding and, therefore, there is a need to identify and characterize additional domains important for VP40 function. We demonstrate here that the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ sequence of eVP40 and the corresponding ₈₄LPLGIM₈₉ sequence of Marburg virus VP40 (mVP40) are critical for efficient release of VP40 VLPs. Indeed, deletion of these motifs essentially abolished the ability of eVP40 and mVP40 to bud as VLPs. To address the mechanism by which the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif of eVP40 contributes to egress, a series of point mutations were introduced into this motif. These mutants were then compared to the eVP40 wild type in a VLP budding assay to assess budding competency. Confocal microscopy and gel filtration analyses were performed to assess their pattern of intracellular localization and ability to oligomerize, respectively. Our results show that mutations disrupting the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif resulted in both altered patterns of intracellular localization and self-assembly compared to wild-type controls. Interestingly, coexpression of either Ebola virus GP-WT or mVP40-WT with eVP40-ΔLPLGVA failed to rescue the budding defective eVP40-ΔLPLGVA mutant into VLPs; however, coexpression of eVP40-WT with mVP40-ΔLPLGIM successfully rescued budding of mVP40-ΔLPLGIM into VLPs at mVP40-WT levels. In sum, our findings implicate the LPLGVA and LPLGIM motifs of eVP40 and mVP40, respectively, as being important for VP40 structure/stability and budding.Ebola and Marburg viruses are members of the family Filoviridae. Filoviruses are filamentous, negative-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses that cause lethal hemorrhagic fevers in both humans and nonhuman primates (5). Filoviruses encode seven viral proteins including: NP (major nucleoprotein), VP35 (phosphoprotein), VP40 (matrix protein), GP (glycoprotein), VP30 (minor nucleoprotein), VP24 (secondary matrix protein), and L (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) (2, 5, 10, 12, 45). Numerous studies have shown that expression of Ebola virus VP40 (eVP40) alone in mammalian cells leads to the production of virus-like particles (VLPs) with filamentous morphology which is indistinguishable from infectious Ebola virus particles (12, 17, 18, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 49). Like many enveloped viruses such as rhabdovirus (11) and arenaviruses (44), Ebola virus encodes late-assembly or L domains, which are sequences required for the membrane fission event that separates viral and cellular membranes to release nascent virion particles (1, 5, 7, 10, 12, 18, 25, 27, 34). Thus far, four classes of L domains have been identified which were defined by their conserved amino acid core sequences: the Pro-Thr/Ser-Ala-Pro (PT/SAP) motif (25, 27), the Pro-Pro-x-Tyr (PPxY) motif (11, 12, 18, 19, 41, 53), the Tyr-x-x-Leu (YxxL) motif (3, 15, 27, 37), and the Phe-Pro-Ile-Val (FPIV) motif (39). Both PTAP and the PPxY motifs are essential for efficient particle release for eVP40 (25, 27, 48, 49), whereas mVP40 contains only a PPxY motif. L domains are believed to act as docking sites for the recruitment of cellular proteins involved in endocytic trafficking and multivesicular body biogenesis to facilitate virus-cell separation (8, 13, 14, 16, 28, 29, 33, 36, 43, 50, 51).In addition to L domains, oligomerization, and plasma-membrane localization of VP40 are two functions of the protein that are critical for efficient budding of VLPs and virions. Specific sequences involved in self-assembly and membrane localization have yet to be defined precisely. However, recent reports have attempted to identify regions of VP40 that are important for its overall function in assembly and budding. For example, the amino acid region ₂₁₂KLR₂₁₄ located at the C-terminal region was found to be important for efficient release of eVP40 VLPs, with Leu₂₁₃ being the most critical (30). Mutation of the ₂₁₂KLR₂₁₄ region resulted in altered patterns of cellular localization and oligomerization of eVP40 compared to those of the wild-type genotype (30). In addition, the proline at position 53 was also implicated as being essential for eVP40 VLP release and plasma-membrane localization (54).In a more recent study, a YPLGVG motif within the M protein of Nipah virus (NiV) was shown to be important for stability, membrane binding, and budding of NiV VLPs (35). Whether this NiV M motif represents a new class of L domain remains to be determined. However, it is clear that this YPLGVG motif of NiV M is important for budding, perhaps involving a novel mechanism (35). Our rationale for investigating the corresponding, conserved motifs present within the Ebola and Marburg virus VP40 proteins was based primarily on these findings with NiV. In addition, Ebola virus VP40 motif maps close to the hinge region separating the N- and C-terminal domains of VP40 (4). Thus, the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif of eVP40 is predicted to be important for the overall stability and function of VP40 during egress. Findings presented here indicate that disruption of these filovirus VP40 motifs results in a severe defect in VLP budding, due in part to impairment in overall VP40 structure, stability and/or intracellular localization.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Virus Replication Upregulates Serine Protease Inhibitor Kazal,Resulting in Cellular Resistance to Serine Protease-Dependent Apoptosis

Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV, respectively) are different and distinct viruses, but there are striking similarities in their disease potential. Infection by either virus can cause chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and ultimately, liver cancer, despite the fact that no pathogenetic mechanisms are known which are shared by the two viruses. Our recent studies have suggested that replication of either of these viruses upregulates a cellular protein called serine protease inhibitor Kazal (SPIK). Furthermore, the data have shown that cells containing HBV and HCV are more resistant to serine protease-dependent apoptotic death. Since our previous studies have shown that SPIK is an inhibitor of serine protease-dependent apoptosis, it is hypothesized that the upregulation of SPIK caused by HBV and HCV replication leads to cell resistance to apoptosis. The evasion of apoptotic death by infected cells results in persistent viral replication and constant liver inflammation, which leads to gradual accumulation of genetic changes and eventual development of cancer. These findings suggest a possibility by which HBV and HCV, two very different viruses, can share a common mechanism in provoking liver disease and cancer.Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are serious worldwide health problems, with more than 500 million people believed to be chronically infected with at least one of these viruses (36). HBV is a DNA virus belonging to the Hepadnaviridae family (21), while HCV is an RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family (7). Despite the fact that they are two very different viruses, they share a common pathology in the ability to cause chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and ultimately, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (34). It remains unclear why these two viruses, which are fundamentally so different, can both lead to similar disease states and the development of HCC.Numerous studies suggest that in chronic viral hepatitis, the host''s immune system is unable to clear infected cells (34). The persistent viral replication further stimulates liver inflammation, and prolonged inflammation and viral persistence result in a gradual accumulation of genetic changes which can subsequently lead to transformation and development of HCC (3, 13). It is possible that part of this failure of the host to clear infected cells results from an inability to induce apoptosis in these cells. For example, persistent HBV/HCV infection suppresses cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL)-induced apoptosis (3, 4). Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, plays a critical role in embryonic development, immune system function, and the overall maintenance of tissue homeostasis in multicellular organisms. It is also important in the host''s control of viral infection (4). The execution of the apoptotic program has traditionally been considered the result of the activation of a family of proteases known as caspases. Caspase-dependent cell apoptosis (CDCA) usually initiates by activating caspases 8 and 10 through proteolysis of their proenzymes, which further activates the executioner caspases, such as caspase 3 and caspase 7, resulting in the degradation of chromosomal DNA and cell death (28, 29). Recent evidence, however, has suggested that apoptotic cell death can also be promoted and triggered by serine proteases in a caspase-independent manner (5, 6, 39). Serine protease-dependent cell apoptosis (SPDCA) differs from CDCA in that serine proteases, not caspases, are critical to the apoptotic process (1, 6, 39). Interestingly, certain viral infections have been shown to induce SPDCA (27, 39).Failure of the immune-mediated removal of malignant cells through apoptosis may be due to the upregulation of apoptosis inhibitors in these cells (12, 18). We recently demonstrated that SPDCA can be inhibited by a small, 79-amino-acid protein called serine protease inhibitor Kazal (SPIK) (22). SPIK, which is also known as SPINK1, TATI (tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor), and PSTI (pancreas secretory trypsin inhibitor) (8, 24, 38), was first discovered in the pancreas as an inhibitor of autoactivation of trypsinogen (9). The expression of SPIK in normal tissue is limited or inactivated outside the pancreas, but expression of SPIK is elevated in numerous cancers, such as colorectal tumors, renal cell carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (16, 19, 24, 31, 40, 41). It remains unknown, however, what role SPIK may play in cancer formation and development. Additionally, overexpression of SPIK was also found in HBV/HCV-infected human livers (32), and an even higher level of expression of SPIK was found in HBV/HCV-associated HCC tissue (19, 31). This implies that SPIK may be closely associated with hepatitis virus infection and development of HCC.Here we show direct evidence that HBV/HCV replication does in fact upregulate expression of the apoptosis inhibitor SPIK, resulting in resistance to SPDCA, which could ultimately lead to the development of chronic hepatitis and liver cancer.     

Mutations in the Stalk Region of the Measles Virus Hemagglutinin Inhibit Syncytium Formation but Not Virus Entry

Measles virus (MV) entry requires at least 2 viral proteins, the hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins. We describe the rescue and characterization of a measles virus with a specific mutation in the stalk region of H (I98A) that is able to bind normally to cells but infects at a lower rate than the wild type due to a reduction in fusion triggering. The mutant H protein binds to F more avidly than the parent H protein does, and the corresponding virus is more sensitive to inhibition by fusion-inhibitory peptide. We show that after binding of MV to its receptor, H-F dissociation is required for productive infection.Measles virus (MV) infection requires binding of the hemagglutinin (H) protein to its cognate receptors (9, 20, 21, 29, 41) while the fusion (F) protein triggers membrane lipid mixing and fusion. The H protein is a type II transmembrane homodimeric, disulfide-linked glycoprotein (33). The F protein is a type I membrane glycoprotein that exists as a homotrimeric complex. The protein is cleaved by furin in the trans-Golgi network into a metastable heterodimer with a membrane-spanning F₁ domain and a membrane-distal F₂ domain (16). Expressed alone, neither H nor F leads to membrane fusion, and therefore, both proteins are required and have to interact for productive infection of a target cell (46). There is evidence that these interactions start within the endoplasmic reticulum (34).The H proteins of Paramyxoviridae family members have a globular head with a six-blade β-propellor structure that is responsible for receptor binding (4, 7, 13), a stalk region composed of alpha-helical coiled coils (18, 48) that anchors the complex to the plasma membrane, and a short cytoplasmic domain that can interact with the matrix (M) protein and modulate fusion (2). Given that the F protein does not interact with a receptor on the target cell but undergoes conformational changes to enable membrane fusion, it seems likely that the F protein must interact with the H protein that enables fusion (14, 19, 23, 24, 35, 47). The molecular interactions between the F and H proteins are being increasingly understood (6, 8, 24, 25, 30, 35, 42). Hummel and Bellini have described a mutation in the H glycoprotein where threonine replaced isoleucine 98, which led to loss of fusion in chronically infected cells, but the virus was not rescued (15). Corey and Iorio performed alanine-scanning mutagenesis to determine the role of specific, membrane-proximal residues in the stalk region of the H protein responsible for H-F interactions (6). Substitution of alanine for specific residues in this region altered cell-to-cell fusion and the strength of the H-F interaction in transient-transfection experiments (6). Replacement of isoleucine with alanine at position 98 reduced fusion but did not significantly alter hemadsorption, implying that binding of the mutant H protein to CD46 was not affected (6). More recently, Paal et al. showed that the H protein can tolerate significant additions to its alpha-helical coiled coils without loss of binding or fusion in transient-transfection assays (30). Although these studies confirm the importance of the interactions between the H protein stalk and the metastable F protein for enabling fusion after receptor binding, the exact steps leading to fusion are still unclear. Moreover, studies evaluating H-F interactions were performed with transient protein expression and not in the presence of the actual virus. This is potentially an important shortcoming since the M protein can modulate infection and fusion (1).     

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleocapsid p1 Confers ESCRT Pathway Dependence

To facilitate the release of infectious progeny virions, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) exploits the Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT) pathway by engaging Tsg101 and ALIX through late assembly (L) domains in the C-terminal p6 domain of Gag. However, the L domains in p6 are known to be dispensable for efficient particle production by certain HIV-1 Gag constructs that have the nucleocapsid (NC) domain replaced by a foreign dimerization domain to substitute for the assembly function of NC. We now show that one such L domain-independent HIV-1 Gag construct (termed Z_WT) that has NC-p1-p6 replaced by a leucine zipper domain is resistant to dominant-negative inhibitors of the ESCRT pathway that block HIV-1 particle production. However, Z_WT became dependent on the presence of an L domain when NC-p1-p6 was restored to its C terminus. Furthermore, when the NC domain was replaced by a leucine zipper, the p1-p6 region, but not p6 alone, conferred sensitivity to inhibition of the ESCRT pathway. In an authentic HIV-1 Gag context, the effect of an inhibitor of the ESCRT pathway on particle production could be alleviated by deleting a portion of the NC domain together with p1. Together, these results indicate that the ESCRT pathway dependence of HIV-1 budding is determined, at least in part, by the NC-p1 region of Gag.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and other retroviruses hijack the cellular Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT) pathway to promote the detachment of virions from the cell surface and from each other (3, 21, 42, 44, 47). The ESCRT pathway was initially identified based on its requirement for the sorting of ubiquitinated cargo into multivesicular bodies (MVB) (50, 51). During MVB biogenesis, the ESCRT pathway drives the membrane deformation and fission events required for the inward vesiculation of the limiting membrane of this organelle (26, 29, 50, 51). More recently, it emerged that the ESCRT pathway is also essential for the normal abscission of daughter cells during the final stage of cell division (10, 43). Most of the components of the ESCRT pathway are involved in the formation of four heteromeric protein complexes termed ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, and ESCRT-III. Additional components include ALIX, which interacts both with ESCRT-I and ESCRT-III, and the AAA ATPase Vps4, which mediates the disassembly of ESCRT-III (29, 42).The deformation and scission of endocytic membranes is thought to be mediated by ESCRT-III, which, together with Vps4, constitutes the most conserved element of the pathway (23, 26, 42). Indeed, it was recently shown that purified yeast ESCRT-III induces membrane deformation (52), and in another study three subunits of yeast ESCRT-III were sufficient to promote the formation of intralumenal vesicles in an in vitro assay (61). In mammals, ESCRT-III is formed by the charged MVB proteins (CHMPs), which are structurally related and tightly regulated through autoinhibition (2, 33, 46, 53, 62). The removal of an inhibitory C-terminal domain induces polymerization and association with endosomal membranes and converts CHMPs into potent inhibitors of retroviral budding (34, 46, 53, 60, 62). Alternatively, CHMPs can be converted into strong inhibitors of the ESCRT pathway and of HIV-1 budding through the addition of a bulky tag such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) or red fluorescent protein (RFP) (27, 36, 39, 54). Retroviral budding in general is also strongly inhibited by catalytically inactive Vps4 (22, 41, 55), or upon Vsp4B depletion (31), confirming the crucial role of ESCRT-III.Retroviruses engage the ESCRT pathway through the activity of so-called late assembly (L) domains in Gag. In the case of HIV-1, the primary L domain maps to a conserved PTAP motif in the C-terminal p6 domain of Gag (24, 28) and interacts with the ESCRT-I component Tsg101 (15, 22, 40, 58). HIV-1 p6 also harbors an auxiliary L domain of the LYPx_nL type, which interacts with the V domain of ALIX (20, 35, 39, 54, 59, 63). Interestingly, Tsg101 binding site mutants of HIV-1 can be fully rescued through the overexpression of ALIX, and this rescue depends on the ALIX binding site in p6 (20, 56). In contrast, the overexpression of a specific splice variant of the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-2 has been shown to rescue the release and infectivity of HIV-1 mutants lacking all known L domains in p6 (12, 57). Nedd4 family ubiquitin ligases had previously been implicated in the function of PPxY-type L domains, which also depend on an intact ESCRT pathway for function (4, 32, 38). However, HIV-1 Gag lacks PPxY motifs, and the WW domains of Nedd4-2, which mediate its interaction with PPxY motifs, are dispensable for the rescue of HIV-1 L domain mutants (57).ALIX also interacts with the nucleocapsid (NC) region of HIV-1 Gag (18, 49), which is located upstream of p6 and the p1 spacer peptide. ALIX binds HIV-1 NC via its Bro1 domain, and the capacity to interact with NC and to stimulate the release of a minimal HIV-1 Gag construct is shared among widely divergent Bro1 domain proteins (48). Based on these findings and the observation that certain mutations in NC cause a phenotype that resembles that of L domain mutants, it has been proposed that NC cooperates with p6 to recruit the machinery required for normal HIV-1 budding (18, 49).NC also plays a role in Gag polyprotein multimerization, and this function of NC depends on its RNA-binding activity (5-8). It has been proposed that the role of the NC-nucleic acid interaction during assembly is to promote the formation of Gag dimers (37), and HIV-1 assembly in the absence of NC can indeed be efficiently rescued by leucine zipper dimerization domains (65). Surprisingly, in this setting the L domains in p6 also became dispensable, since particle production remained efficient even when the entire NC-p1-p6 region of HIV-1 Gag was replaced by a leucine zipper (1, 65). These findings raised the possibility that the reliance of wild-type (WT) HIV-1 Gag on a functional ESCRT pathway is, at least in part, specified by NC-p1-p6. However, it also remained possible that the chimeric Gag constructs engaged the ESCRT pathway in an alternative manner.In the present report, we provide evidence supporting the first of those two possibilities. Particle production became independent of ESCRT when the entire NC-p1-p6 region was replaced by a leucine zipper, and reversion to ESCRT dependence was shown to occur as a result of restoration of p1-p6 but not of p6 alone. Furthermore, although the deletion of p1 alone had little effect in an authentic HIV-1 Gag context, the additional removal of a portion of NC improved particle production in the presence of an inhibitor of the ESCRT pathway. Together, these data imply that the NC-p1 region plays an important role in the ESCRT-dependence of HIV-1 particle production.