A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Specific Degradation of the Mucus Adhesion-Promoting Protein (MapA) of Lactobacillus reuteri to an Antimicrobial Peptide

The intestinal flora of mammals contains lactic acid bacteria (LAB) that may provide positive health effects for the host. Such bacteria are referred to as probiotic bacteria. From a pig, we have isolated a Lactobacillus reuteri strain that produces an antimicrobial peptide (AMP). The peptide was purified and characterized, and it was unequivocally shown that the AMP was a well-defined degradation product obtained from the mucus adhesion-promoting protein (MapA); it was therefore termed AP48-MapA. This finding demonstrates how large proteins might inherit unexpected pleiotropic functions by conferring antimicrobial capacities on the producer. The MapA/AP48-MapA system is the first example where a large protein of an intestinal LAB is shown to give rise to such an AMP. It is also of particular interest that the protein that provides this AMP is associated with the binding of the bacterium producing it to the surface/lining of the gut. This finding gives us new perspective on how some probiotic bacteria may successfully compete in this environment and thereby contribute to a healthy microbiota.Mammals have a microbiota in their digestive tract that contains lactic acid bacteria (LAB). It has been increasingly evident that some of these lactic acid bacteria produce antimicrobial peptides that may contribute to the positive effect on their host. Such bacteria are often referred to as probiotics, and one of their important beneficial effects is their ability to produce antimicrobial compounds that prevent or interfere with the growth of pathogenic bacteria in the host.It is known that the fecal microflora of pigs/piglets is large and diverse and develops rapidly after birth. Lactobacillus reuteri is among the very first lactic acid bacteria that colonize the intestine of new-born piglets, and their numbers gradually increase until they become the most dominant LAB in pigs (5, 17, 28). Other lactobacilli that are also part of the gut microbiota of pigs include L. amylovorus, L. acidophilus, L. salivarius, and L. casei (4, 8). Probiotic isolates have been identified within all these species, and many of them are today used as food/feed supplements to support good health (4, 11, 27). An important part of the antimicrobial arsenal produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a group of peptides called bacteriocins, which are ribosomally synthesized antibiotic-like peptides (antimicrobial peptides [AMPs]) (3, 7, 19). The bacteriocins constitute a wide range of structurally different peptides that are divided into different classes and subclasses. Some are modified (the lantibiotics, or class I), while others are basically unmodified (class II) (3, 6, 19).Most bacteriocins are derived from prepeptides, each containing a short leader sequence (14 to 30 amino acids [aa]) which is cleaved off during the secretion of the mature peptide (19). In recent years, a new group of AMPs have been recognized (18); these are different from regular bacteriocins in that they are derived from larger proteins through specific degradations, leading to a defined peptide possessing antimicrobial activity. Such antimicrobial peptides have been known for a long time in mammalian systems. For instance, lactoferrin, a protein in milk, is readily degraded to a specific antimicrobial peptide through heat, acid treatment, or pepsin digestion (14, 24, 26). Defined histone fragments with antimicrobial properties have been isolated from different eukaryotic species (1, 2, 15, 21, 23), and a few antimicrobial peptides derived from larger proteins have been isolated in bacteria, including Helicobacter pylori (22), propionic acid bacteria (9, 10), and Clostridium beijerinckii (13). Such antimicrobial peptides are most likely formed by proteolytic degradation during cell proliferation or death.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Inactivation of Vibrio anguillarum by Attached and Planktonic Roseobacter Cells

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the inhibition of Vibrio by Roseobacter in a combined liquid-surface system. Exposure of Vibrio anguillarum to surface-attached roseobacters (10⁷ CFU/cm²) resulted in significant reduction or complete killing of the pathogen inoculated at 10² to 10⁴ CFU/ml. The effect was likely associated with the production of tropodithietic acid (TDA), as a TDA-negative mutant did not affect survival or growth of V. anguillarum.Antagonistic interactions among marine bacteria are well documented, and secretion of antagonistic compounds is common among bacteria that colonize particles or surfaces (8, 13, 16, 21, 31). These marine bacteria may be interesting as sources for new antimicrobial drugs or as probiotic bacteria for aquaculture.Aquaculture is a rapidly growing sector, but outbreaks of bacterial diseases are a limiting factor and pose a threat, especially to young fish and invertebrates that cannot be vaccinated. Because regular or prophylactic administration of antibiotics must be avoided, probiotic bacteria are considered an alternative (9, 18, 34, 38, 39, 40). Several microorganisms have been able to reduce bacterial diseases in challenge trials with fish or fish larvae (14, 24, 25, 27, 33, 37, 39, 40). One example is Phaeobacter strain 27-4 (17), which inhibits Vibrio anguillarum and reduces mortality in turbot larvae (27). The antagonism of Phaeobacter 27-4 and the closely related Phaeobacter inhibens is due mainly to the sulfur-containing tropolone derivative tropodithietic acid (TDA) (2, 5), which is also produced by other Phaeobacter strains and Ruegeria mobilis (28). Phaeobacter and Ruegeria strains or their DNA has been commonly found in marine larva-rearing sites (6, 17, 28).Phaeobacter and Ruegeria (Alphaproteobacteria, Roseobacter clade) are efficient surface colonizers (7, 11, 31, 36). They are abundant in coastal and eutrophic zones and are often associated with algae (3, 7, 41). Surface-attached Phaeobacter bacteria may play an important role in determining the species composition of an emerging biofilm, as even low densities of attached Phaeobacter strain SK2.10 bacteria can prevent other marine organisms from colonizing solid surfaces (30, 32).In continuation of the previous research on roseobacters as aquaculture probiotics, the purpose of this study was to determine the antagonistic potential of Phaeobacter and Ruegeria against Vibrio anguillarum in liquid systems that mimic a larva-rearing environment. Since production of TDA in liquid marine broth appears to be highest when roseobacters form an air-liquid biofilm (5), we addressed whether they could be applied as biofilms on solid surfaces.     

Effects of Ammonium and Nitrite on Growth and Competitive Fitness of Cultivated Methanotrophic Bacteria

The effects of nitrite and ammonium on cultivated methanotrophic bacteria were investigated. Methylomicrobium album ATCC 33003 outcompeted Methylocystis sp. strain ATCC 49242 in cultures with high nitrite levels, whereas cultures with high ammonium levels allowed Methylocystis sp. to compete more easily. M. album pure cultures and cocultures consumed nitrite and produced nitrous oxide, suggesting a connection between denitrification and nitrite tolerance.The application of ammonium-based fertilizers has been shown to immediately reduce the uptake of methane in a number of diverse ecological systems (3, 5, 7, 8, 11-13, 16, 27, 28), due likely to competitive inhibition of methane monooxygenase enzymes by ammonia and production of nitrite (1). Longer-term inhibition of methane uptake by ammonium has been attributed to changes in methanotrophic community composition, often favoring activity and/or growth of type I Gammaproteobacteria methanotrophs (i.e., Gammaproteobacteria methane-oxidizing bacteria [gamma-MOB]) over type II Alphaproteobacteria methanotrophs (alpha-MOB) (19-23, 25, 26, 30). It has been argued previously that gamma-MOB likely thrive in the presence of high N loads because they rapidly assimilate N and synthesize ribosomes whereas alpha-MOB thrive best under conditions of N limitation and low oxygen levels (10, 21, 23).Findings from studies with rice paddies indicate that N fertilization stimulates methane oxidation through ammonium acting as a nutrient, not as an inhibitor (2). Therefore, the actual effect of ammonium on growth and activity of methanotrophs depends largely on how much ammonia-N is used for assimilation versus cometabolism. Many methanotrophs can also oxidize ammonia into nitrite via hydroxylamine (24, 29). Nitrite was shown previously to inhibit methane consumption by cultivated methanotrophs and by organisms in soils through an uncharacterized mechanism (9, 17, 24), although nitrite inhibits purified formate dehydrogenase from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b (15). Together, the data from these studies show that ammonium and nitrite have significant effects on methanotroph activity and community composition and reveal the complexity of ammonia as both a nutrient and a competitive inhibitor. The present study demonstrates the differential influences of high ammonium or nitrite loads on the competitive fitness of a gamma-MOB versus an alpha-MOB strain.     

Roles of Minor Pilin Subunits Spy0125 and Spy0130 in the Serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes Strain SF370

Adhesive pili on the surface of the serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370 are composed of a major backbone subunit (Spy0128) and two minor subunits (Spy0125 and Spy0130), joined covalently by a pilin polymerase (Spy0129). Previous studies using recombinant proteins showed that both minor subunits bind to human pharyngeal (Detroit) cells (A. G. Manetti et al., Mol. Microbiol. 64:968-983, 2007), suggesting both may act as pilus-presented adhesins. While confirming these binding properties, studies described here indicate that Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role as a wall linker. Pili were localized predominantly to cell wall fractions of the wild-type S. pyogenes parent strain and a spy0125 deletion mutant. In contrast, they were found almost exclusively in culture supernatants in both spy0130 and srtA deletion mutants, indicating that the housekeeping sortase (SrtA) attaches pili to the cell wall by using Spy0130 as a linker protein. Adhesion assays with antisera specific for individual subunits showed that only anti-rSpy0125 serum inhibited adhesion of wild-type S. pyogenes to human keratinocytes and tonsil epithelium to a significant extent. Spy0125 was localized to the tip of pili, based on a combination of mutant analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of purified pili. Assays comparing parent and mutant strains confirmed its role as the adhesin. Unexpectedly, apparent spontaneous cleavage of a labile, proline-rich (8 of 14 residues) sequence separating the N-terminal ∼1/3 and C-terminal ∼2/3 of Spy0125 leads to loss of the N-terminal region, but analysis of internal spy0125 deletion mutants confirmed that this has no significant effect on adhesion.The group A Streptococcus (S. pyogenes) is an exclusively human pathogen that commonly colonizes either the pharynx or skin, where local spread can give rise to various inflammatory conditions such as pharyngitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, or erysipelas. Although often mild and self-limiting, GAS infections are occasionally very severe and sometimes lead to life-threatening diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. A wide variety of cell surface components and extracellular products have been shown or suggested to play important roles in S. pyogenes virulence, including cell surface pili (1, 6, 32). Pili expressed by the serotype M1 S. pyogenes strain SF370 mediate specific adhesion to intact human tonsil epithelia and to primary human keratinocytes, as well as cultured keratinocyte-derived HaCaT cells, but not to Hep-2 or A549 cells (1). They also contribute to adhesion to a human pharyngeal cell line (Detroit cells) and to biofilm formation (29).Over the past 5 years, pili have been discovered on an increasing number of important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including Bacillus cereus (4), Bacillus anthracis (4, 5), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (13, 14, 19, 26, 27, 44, 46, 47), Streptococcus agalactiae (7, 23, 38), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2, 3, 24, 25, 34), as well as S. pyogenes (1, 29, 32). All these species produce pili that are composed of a single major subunit plus either one or two minor subunits. During assembly, the individual subunits are covalently linked to each other via intermolecular isopeptide bonds, catalyzed by specialized membrane-associated transpeptidases that may be described as pilin polymerases (4, 7, 25, 41, 44, 46). These are related to the classical housekeeping sortase (usually, but not always, designated SrtA) that is responsible for anchoring many proteins to Gram-positive bacterial cell walls (30, 31, 33). The C-terminal ends of sortase target proteins include a cell wall sorting (CWS) motif consisting, in most cases, of Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly (LPXTG, where X can be any amino acid) (11, 40). Sortases cleave this substrate between the Thr and Gly residues and produce an intermolecular isopeptide bond linking the Thr to a free amino group provided by a specific target. In attaching proteins to the cell wall, the target amino group is provided by the lipid II peptidoglycan precursor (30, 36, 40). In joining pilus subunits, the target is the ɛ-amino group in the side chain of a specific Lys residue in the second subunit (14, 18, 19). Current models of pilus biogenesis envisage repeated transpeptidation reactions adding additional subunits to the base of the growing pilus, until the terminal subunit is eventually linked covalently via an intermolecular isopeptide bond to the cell wall (28, 41, 45).The major subunit (sometimes called the backbone or shaft subunit) extends along the length of the pilus and appears to play a structural role, while minor subunits have been detected either at the tip, the base, and/or at occasional intervals along the shaft, depending on the species (4, 23, 24, 32, 47). In S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae one of the minor subunits acts as an adhesin, while the second appears to act as a linker between the base of the assembled pilus and the cell wall (7, 15, 22, 34, 35). It was originally suggested that both minor subunits of C. diphtheriae pili could act as adhesins (27). However, recent data showed one of these has a wall linker role (26, 44) and may therefore not function as an adhesin.S. pyogenes strain SF370 pili are composed of a major (backbone) subunit, termed Spy0128, plus two minor subunits, called Spy0125 and Spy0130 (1, 32). All three are required for efficient adhesion to target cells (1). Studies employing purified recombinant proteins have shown that both of the minor subunits, but not the major subunit, bind to Detroit cells (29), suggesting both might act as pilus-presented adhesins. Here we report studies employing a combination of recombinant proteins, specific antisera, and allelic replacement mutants which show that only Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role in linking pili to the cell wall.     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

Development and Application of a Novel Peptide Nucleic Acid Probe for the Specific Detection of Cronobacter Genomospecies (Enterobacter sakazakii) in Powdered Infant Formula

Here, we report a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method for rapid detection of Cronobacter strains in powdered infant formula (PIF) using a novel peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe. Laboratory tests with several Enterobacteriaceae species showed that the specificity and sensitivity of the method were 100%. FISH using PNA could detect as few as 1 CFU per 10 g of Cronobacter in PIF after an 8-h enrichment step, even in a mixed population containing bacterial contaminants.Cronobacter strains were originally described as Enterobacter sakazakii (12), but they are now known to comprise a novel genus consisting of six separate genomospecies (20, 21). These opportunistic pathogens are ubiquitous in the environment and various types of food and are occasionally found in the normal human flora (11, 12, 16, 32, 47). Based on case reports, Cronobacter infections in adults are generally less severe than Cronobacter infections in newborn infants, with which a high fatality rate is associated (24).The ability to detect Cronobacter and trace possible sources of infection is essential as a means of limiting the impact of these organisms on neonatal health and maintaining consumer confidence in powdered infant formula (PIF). Conventional methods, involving isolation of individual colonies followed by biochemical identification, are more time-consuming than molecular methods, and the reliability of some currently proposed culture-based methods has been questioned (28). Recently, several PCR-based techniques have been described (23, 26, 28-31, 38). These techniques are reported to be efficient even when low levels of Cronobacter cells are found in a sample (0.36 to 66 CFU/100 g). However, PCR requires DNA extraction and does not allow direct, in situ visualization of the bacterium in a sample.Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a method that is commonly used for bacterial identification and localization in samples. This method is based on specific binding of nucleic acid probes to particular DNA or RNA target regions (1, 2). rRNA has been regarded as the most suitable target for bacterial FISH, allowing differentiation of potentially viable cells. Traditionally, FISH methods are based on the use of conventional DNA oligonucleotide probes, and a commercial system, VIT-E sakazakii (Vermicon A.G., Munich, Germany), has been developed based on this technology (25). However, a recently developed synthetic DNA analogue, peptide nucleic acid (PNA), has been shown to provide improved hybridization performance compared to DNA probes, making FISH procedures easier and more efficient (41). Taking advantage of the PNA properties, FISH using PNA has been successfully used for detection of several clinically relevant microorganisms (5, 15, 17, 27, 34-36).     

Engineering of Clostridium phytofermentans Endoglucanase Cel5A for Improved Thermostability

A family 5 glycoside hydrolase from Clostridium phytofermentans was cloned and engineered through a cellulase cell surface display system in Escherichia coli. The presence of cell surface anchoring, a cellulose binding module, or a His tag greatly influenced the activities of wild-type and mutant enzymes on soluble and solid cellulosic substrates, suggesting the high complexity of cellulase engineering. The best mutant had 92%, 36%, and 46% longer half-lives at 60°C on carboxymethyl cellulose, regenerated amorphous cellulose, and Avicel, respectively.The production of biofuels from nonfood cellulosic biomass would benefit the economy, the environment, and national energy security (17, 32). The largest technological and economical obstacle is the release of soluble fermentable sugars at prices competitive with those from sugarcane or corn kernels (17, 31). One of the approaches is discovering new cellulases from cellulolytic microorganisms, followed by cellulase engineering for enhanced performance on pretreated solid substrates. However, cellulase engineering remains challenging because enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis is complicated, involving heterogeneous substrates (33, 37), different action mode cellulase components (18), synergy and/or competition among cellulase components (36, 37), and declining substrate reactivity over the course of conversion (11, 26). Directed enzyme evolution, independent of knowledge of the protein structure and the enzyme-substrate interactions (6, 34), has been conducted to generate endoglucanase mutants, such as enhanced activities on soluble substrates (14, 16, 22), prolonged thermostability (20), changed optimum pH (24, 28), or improved expression levels (21). Here, we cloned and characterized a family 5 glycoside hydrolase (Cel5A) from a cellulolytic bacterium, Clostridium phytofermentans ISDg (ATCC 700394) (29, 30), and engineered it for enhanced thermostability.     

Cloning and Characterization of an Intracellular Esterase from the Wine-Associated Lactic Acid Bacterium Oenococcus oeni

We report the cloning and characterization of EstB28, the first esterase to be so characterized from the wine-associated lactic acid bacterium, Oenococcus oeni. The published sequence for O. oeni strain PSU-1 was used to identify putative esterase genes and design PCR primers in order to amplify the corresponding region from strain Ooeni28, an isolate intended for inoculation of wines. In this way a 912-bp open reading frame (ORF) encoding a putative esterase of 34.5 kDa was obtained. The amino acid sequence indicated that EstB28 is a member of family IV of lipolytic enzymes and contains the GDSAG motif common to other lactic acid bacteria. This ORF was cloned into Escherichia coli using an appropriate expression system, and the recombinant esterase was purified. Characterization of EstB28 revealed that the optimum temperature, pH, and ethanol concentration were 40°C, pH 5.0, and 28% (vol/vol), respectively. EstB28 also retained marked activity under conditions relevant to winemaking (10 to 20°C, pH 3.5, 14% [vol/vol] ethanol). Kinetic constants were determined for EstB28 with p-nitrophenyl (pNP)-linked substrates ranging in chain length from C₂ to C₁₈. EstB28 exhibited greatest specificity for C₂ to C₄ pNP-linked substrates.The quality of fermented foods and beverages is affected in part by their composition of aroma compounds. In winemaking, the malolactic fermentation is used to deacidify wine and is typically carried out by Lactobacillus spp., Pediococcus spp., and particularly Oenococcus oeni (10, 7). Numerous reports clearly show that outside of this core function, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) can also bring about significant changes of sensorial importance (2, 5, 12, 32, 40, 49, 55). Such studies typically examined the action of active cultures or whole cells; however, the promise of LAB as a source of purified enzymes for use as additives in winemaking has recently been highlighted (43).Oenococcus oeni is acidophilic and indigenous to wine and similar environments. While the genome of the commercial PSU-1 strain has been sequenced and analyzed (44), there is limited information on the genes or their potential contribution to food and beverage aroma. The only such genes which have been cloned and partially characterized are alsS and alsD (24), which are thought to be responsible for the production of diacetyl, the principle compound conferring “buttery” aroma and flavor in wine (reviewed in reference 4). Analogous characterization of other flavor-related genes and enzymes not only may have practical implications for processes using LAB but also may be of fundamental interest.As a group, esters are a quantitatively significant constituent of beverages such as wine (total of >100 mg·liter⁻¹) (15). Included in this group are the C₄ to C₁₀ ethyl esters of organic acids, ethyl esters of straight-chain fatty acids (and branched-chain fatty acids to a lesser degree), and acetates of higher alcohols which are largely, if not exclusively, responsible for the fruity aroma of wine (13, 14). Some volatile esters are frequently found in fermented beverages in only trace amounts, often below threshold concentrations (3, 21, 25, 29, 50). However, they are extremely important for the flavor profile of these products, with different esters often having a synergistic effect to collectively affect aroma when their individual threshold concentrations are not exceeded. The fact that most esters are present in wine at concentrations around the threshold value implies that minor concentration changes might have a dramatic effect on the wine''s flavor (3, 21, 25, 29, 50). For this reason, an understanding of the hydrolysis and synthesis of esters in winemaking and how these may be manipulated is essential.A large amount of esters is formed during the primary fermentation by yeast; after this, LAB can contribute by increasing and decreasing the ester concentration (2, 5, 12, 40, 49, 55). Ester hydrolysis and synthesis can be catalyzed by esterases (6, 35, 38, 54). These enzymes commonly contain a catalytic triad composed of Ser, His, and Asp/Glu residues and a nucleophilic elbow structural motif (GXSXG), which contains the active-site serine residue (1, 31, 36, 48). They also contain an oxyanion hole, of which two residues donate their backbone amide protons to stabilize the substrate in the transition state. The oxyanion hole residues (in bold) have been divided into two groups termed GX and GGGX, with the glycine and a hydrophobic residue (X) being highly conserved (48).While extensive research has been carried out on the enzymes responsible for ester formation by wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (22, 23, 45, 51), esterase activity for wine-related LAB is not well documented. Most characterization of esterases in LAB has focused on dairy isolates (9, 16-18, 20). Parallel work in a wine context is limited despite general acceptance of the importance of esters in wine. Until recently, most evidence that wine LAB possess esterase activity came from wine volatile profiling studies which investigated the changes in concentration of individual esters during malolactic fermentation (12, 40, 55). Such changes in ester concentration were strain specific and had the potential to greatly affect the final aroma of wine.Our survey of the esterase activities of whole LAB cells found variations within species and even greater variation between the genera (42), with O. oeni showing greatest activity toward the p-nitrophenyl (pNP)-linked substrates tested. More recently (41), the esterase activities of whole O. oeni, lactobacillus, and pediococcus cells was determined under conditions with some relevance to wine. At least partial resistance to the harsh conditions used was observed, thereby demonstrating a necessary requirement of any enzyme intended for application in analogous environments. To more completely characterize esterases of LAB, the enzymes and their structural genes must be fully investigated. This study represents an effort to dissect the complex array of ester synthesis and hydrolysis activities in whole cells by cloning, heterologous expression, partial purification, and biochemical characterization of a single esterase from O. oeni. With a view to applying such an esterase under conditions found in wine and perhaps other industrial settings, enzyme function under the harsh physicochemical conditions frequently encountered in wine was examined.