Glucanases and Chitinases as Causal Agents in the Protection of Acacia Extrafloral Nectar from Infestation by Phytopathogens

Nectars are rich in primary metabolites and attract mutualistic animals, which serve as pollinators or as an indirect defense against herbivores. Their chemical composition makes nectars prone to microbial infestation. As protective strategy, floral nectar of ornamental tobacco (Nicotiana langsdorffii × Nicotiana sanderae) contains “nectarins,” proteins producing reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide. By contrast, pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins were detected in Acacia extrafloral nectar (EFN), which is secreted in the context of defensive ant-plant mutualisms. We investigated whether these PR proteins protect EFN from phytopathogens. Five sympatric species (Acacia cornigera, A. hindsii, A. collinsii, A. farnesiana, and Prosopis juliflora) were compared that differ in their ant-plant mutualism. EFN of myrmecophytes, which are obligate ant-plants that secrete EFN constitutively to nourish specialized ant inhabitants, significantly inhibited the growth of four out of six tested phytopathogenic microorganisms. By contrast, EFN of nonmyrmecophytes, which is secreted only transiently in response to herbivory, did not exhibit a detectable inhibitory activity. Combining two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with nanoflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis confirmed that PR proteins represented over 90% of all proteins in myrmecophyte EFN. The inhibition of microbial growth was exerted by the protein fraction, but not the small metabolites of this EFN, and disappeared when nectar was heated. In-gel assays demonstrated the activity of acidic and basic chitinases in all EFNs, whereas glucanases were detected only in EFN of myrmecophytes. Our results demonstrate that PR proteins causally underlie the protection of Acacia EFN from microorganisms and that acidic and basic glucanases likely represent the most important prerequisite in this defensive function.Plants secrete nectar to attract mutualistic animals, which mainly function as pollinators in the case of floral nectar or as defenders against herbivores in the case of extrafloral nectar (EFN; Simpson and Neff, 1981; Heil, 2008; González-Teuber and Heil, 2009a). Because nectars usually represent aqueous solutions of monosaccharides and disaccharides together with amino acids, they are prone to infestation by microbial organisms. When present in the nectar, fungi (González-Teuber et al., 2009) and yeast (Herrera et al., 2009) in particular can alter the chemical composition of the nectar and thereby reduce its suitability for the plant''s animal mutualists (Herrera et al., 2008). Moreover, several phytopathogenic organisms may use the nectar-secreting tissues as entries to infect other plant organs (Bubán et al., 2003; Farkas et al., 2007). Therefore, being an excellent growing medium for yeast, fungi, and bacteria, nectar requires an efficient antimicrobial protection.Unfortunately, our knowledge of the means by which plants protect nectar from microorganisms is extremely limited. Although the first reports on nectar proteins date back to the 1960s and 1970s (Lüttge, 1961; Baker and Baker, 1975), most studies that considered the defensive function of nectar focused on secondary compounds such as alkaloids and phenols. These metabolites commonly protect nectar from consumption by nectar robbers (animals that feed on nectar without providing a mutualistic service to the plant [Stephenson, 1981; Johnson et al., 2006]) or limit the duration of pollinator visits (Kessler et al., 2008). Only during the last decade did a series of studies discover defensive proteins in the floral nectar of ornamental tobacco (Nicotiana langsdorffii × Nicotiana sanderae; Carter et al., 1999). In this species, floral nectar contains a limited array of proteins termed “nectarins.” Nectarins serve the protection from microbial infestation through a biochemical pathway called the nectar redox cycle (Carter and Thornburg, 2004a), in which mainly three of the five nectarins are involved: NEC1, NEC3, and NEC5. NEC1 was characterized as a manganese superoxide dismutase (Carter and Thornburg, 2000), NEC3 has carbonic anhydrase and monodehydroascorbate reductase activity (Carter and Thornburg, 2004b), and NEC5 is a Glc oxidase that functions together with NEC1 in the production of high peroxide levels (Carter and Thornburg, 2004c): nectar of ornamental tobacco can accumulate up to 4 mm hydrogen peroxide, concentrations that are clearly high enough to exhibit toxicity on microorganisms. Thus, the floral nectar of ornamental tobacco is kept free of microbes mainly via the production of small reactive oxygen species.By contrast, a proteomic study on EFN of the ant-plant, Acacia cornigera, revealed the presence of several pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins (González-Teuber et al., 2009). Myrmecophytes (ant-plants) are constitutively inhabited by specialized ant species, which serve as a very efficient indirect defense against herbivores (Heil, 2008). In the most specialized cases, both the ant and the plant depend on this interaction, which thus represents an obligate mutualism. In the EFN of A. cornigera, activities of chitinase, β -1,3-glucanase, and peroxidase were detected together with proteins similar to PR-1, osmotin-like proteins, and thaumatin-like proteins (González-Teuber et al., 2009). Most of these proteins, however, were only investigated by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and characterized via MS-BLAST searches. Because no activity assays had been performed, the presence of these proteins could not be causally linked to the protection of EFN from microorganisms.This study was conducted to determine whether the antimicrobial protection of Acacia EFN can be directly and exclusively allotted to the enzymatic activity of its protein fraction, which would contrast the protective strategy of this nectar from the one that has been described by Carter, Thornburg, and colleagues (Carter et al., 1999; Carter and Thornburg, 2004a). We also aimed at investigating whether Acacia EFN inhibits the growth of phytopathogens and thus can serve in the protection from infection by pathogens that may use nectaries to enter the plant (Bubán et al., 2003). We used four sympatric Acacia species and a closely related Prosopis species, which exhibit different types of ant-plant mutualism and therefore differ in their EFN secretion schemes (Heil et al., 2004) and composition (Heil et al., 2005; González-Teuber and Heil, 2009b). The obligate myrmecophytes among Central American Acacia species secrete EFN constitutively at high rates, and the EFN of these species possesses a much higher level of proteins and of antimicrobial defense than the EFN of congeneric nonmyrmecophytes (González-Teuber et al., 2009). The nonmyrmecophytes, by contrast, secrete EFN at lower rates and only transiently in response to leaf damage; this EFN contains few proteins but high levels of Suc (Heil et al., 2005; González-Teuber et al., 2009).We studied the EFN of the obligate myrmecophytes A. cornigera, Acacia hindsii, and Acacia collinsii and of the two nonmyrmecophytes Acacia farnesiana and Prosopis juliflora. Bioassays were employed to detect inhibitory activities of the nectars against phytopathogens, and in-gel assays were used to determine the presence and functionality of basic and acidic chitinases and glucanases. Size exclusion filtration and heating of the EFN was used to investigate whether the antimicrobial activity of EFN is exclusively caused by the protein fraction. The results demonstrate that the antimicrobial protection of Acacia EFN is caused by the fraction of enzymatically active PR proteins and independent of small, soluble molecules, an observation that represents, to our knowledge, a new strategy by which plants can protect nectar from infestation by potentially deleterious microorganisms.     

Clinicopathologic Characteristics,Prevalence, and Risk Factors of Spontaneous Diabetes in Sooty Mangabeys (Cercocebus atys)

In 2008, clinical observations in our colony of sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys) suggested a high frequency of type 2 diabetes. Postmortem studies of diabetic animals revealed dense amyloid deposits in pancreatic islets. To investigate these findings, we screened our colony (97 male mangabeys; 99 female mangabeys) for the disease from 2008 to 2012. The overall prevalence of diabetes was 11% and of prediabetes was 7%, which is nearly double that reported for other primate species (less than 6%). Fructosamine and triglyceride levels were the best indicators of diabetes; total cholesterol and glycated hemoglobin were not associated with disease. Increasing age was a significant risk factor: prevalence increased from 0% in infants, juveniles, and young adults to 11% in adults and 19% in geriatric mangabeys. Sex, medroxyprogesterone acetate exposure, and SIV status were unrelated to disease. Weight was marginally higher in prediabetics, but body condition did not indicate obesity. Of the 49 mangabeys that were necropsied after clinical euthanasia or death from natural causes, 22 were diabetic; all 22 animals demonstrated pancreatic amyloid, and most had more than 75% of islets replaced with amyloid. We conclude that type 2 diabetes is more common in mangabeys than in other primate species. Diabetes in mangabeys has some unusual pathologic characteristics, including the absence of altered cholesterol levels and glycated hemoglobin but a robust association of pancreatic insular amyloidosis with clinical diabetes. Future research will examine the genetic basis of mangabey diabetes and evaluate additional diagnostic tools using imaging and serum markers.Abbreviations: HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; MPA, medroxyprogesterone acetate; YNPRC, Yerkes National Primate Research CenterSooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys) are Old World NHP that are native to West Africa. Historically their use in research has been limited to infectious disease studies, leprosy studies, and behavioral research.^14,25 Over the past 20 to 30 y, they have been used in HIV–AIDS research. Mangabeys are natural hosts of SIV_smm, which is recognized as the origin of HIV2 infection in humans.^7,8,30,36,42 SIV typically is nonpathogenic in mangabeys despite high levels of virus replication, which makes this species a unique and invaluable model in AIDS research.^7,30,36,42 Our facility maintains a colony of approximately 200 sooty mangabeys. In 2008 clinical observations of relative hyperglycemia, glucosuria, and weight loss in our colony suggested that type 2 diabetes mellitus occurred at a relatively high frequency in this population. Spontaneous diabetes was found in 10% of the colony, and 5% of animals were prediabetic; this incidence is higher than that typically reported for other NHP species, such as cynomolgus macaques (less than 1% to 2%)²² and chimpanzees (less than 1%).³⁷ The prevalence of spontaneous diabetes in humans is typically 8.3%.^2,6,22,37 In addition, necropsies revealed that many affected animals had dense amyloid deposits in pancreatic islet cells. Insular amyloidosis was seen on histology, with a total replacement of islets by amyloid deposition in advanced diabetes. Advanced diabetes was determined by increased weight loss and severity of relative hyperglycemia. The increased clinical prevalence of diabetes in our mangabey colony prompted additional characterization of the clinicopathologic profile, risk factors, and prevalence of diabetes in our mangabey colony.The form of diabetes in this mangabey colony is characterized as type 2 diabetes mellitus, as they have hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and islet amyloidosis. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the most common of the 3 forms of diabetes, and has been documented in humans and NHP,^22,31,37,55 including rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis), Celebes crested macaques (Macaca nigra), bonnet macaques (Macaca radiate), pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina), vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and woolly monkeys (Lagothrix spp.).^{1,24,31,52,55} Type 2 diabetes is a chronic metabolic disorder in which insulin resistance occurs in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue. As type 2 diabetes progresses, it also can be characterized as a relative insulin deficiency.^{1,6,15,22,29,31,37,55} The initial clinical presentation of diabetes in humans and NHP includes polydipsia, polyuria, polyphagia, weight loss, and lethargy.^{1,6,22,27,31,37,55} Similar presentation was observed in our colony of diabetic mangabeys.Diagnostic criteria of diabetes in NHP species is similar to that for humans and is based on clinical symptoms and routine lab tests, including serum chemistry panel to evaluate persistent fasting hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercholesterolemia.^{2,6,11,16-18,21,22,29,31,37,48-50,52,55} Hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia frequently are elevated due to diabetes and therefore are used as supportive diagnostic markers. In addition, the disease is characterized by transient hyperinsulinemia followed by insulin deficiency subsequent to glucose challenge. Urinalysis is used to evaluate glucosuria and ketonuria. These tests are not exclusive for diagnosing diabetes and can be inconsistent between species, thus making conclusive diagnosis challenging. For example, hyperglycemia can be a transient finding associated with recent food intake or stress associated with restraint for blood sample collection or anesthetic access, whereas hypertriglyceridemia can be seen in obese animals and those with other metabolic diseases such as pancreatitis and hypothyroidism.^1,22,37,55The typical clinical approach to the diagnosis of diabetes in NHP and other veterinary patients includes evaluation of fructosamine and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and glucose tolerance testing. These tests are indices of glycemic control and are used in clinical settings primarily to assess prognosis and response to treatment; they are also useful for the initial diagnosis of diabetes when used in parallel with serum chemistry markers. Fructosamine and HbA1c can both provide information on long-term glycemic control, because fructosamine reflects average blood glucose levels over 2 to 3 wk whereas HbA1c reflects average blood glucose over 2 to 3 mo preceding blood collection. HbA1c is the primary test for diabetes in human medicine,^6,31,35,37 whereas fructosamine is commonly used in veterinary medicine. Glucose tolerance testing provides an indirect measure of insulin sensitivity, but it is not frequently used clinically in NHP because of the requirement for prolonged physical restraint or sedation.^{1,21,22,26,27,34,37,55}Prevention and management of diabetes in NHP and humans can be achieved by identifying potential risk factors, including age, weight, sex, genetics, hormone drug exposure, and viral status.^{1,6,15,22,29,31,37,42,55} Advanced age, obesity, sex, and genetics are associated with diabetes in some species of NHP and humans.^{1,6,15,22,29,31,37,55} In addition, exposure to drugs such as medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is suspected to be linked to diabetes due to the hormonal effects of progesterone impacting glucoregulatory function.^{1,6,10,22,23,31,34,55} MPA exposure is of interest, because it is used regularly in our mangabey colony as both a contraceptive and as therapy for endometriosis. In addition, SIV status is being evaluated as a risk factor, because a portion of our colony is SIV positive. Although HIV is not thought to be associated with diabetes in people, SIV pathogenesis in mangabeys differs; therefore it was of interest to explore the possible association of SIV and diabetes in mangabeys.^7,30,36,42 Pancreatic insular amyloidosis has been documented to be associated with type 2 diabetes in several species. Amyloidosis is a group of disorders that are caused by extracellular deposition of misfolded proteins that can result in impaired function of any organ.^{15,20,23,28,32,43,45,48,49} Because a high incidence of pancreatic insular amyloid was noted at necropsy, we sought to document the relationship with clinical diabetes in mangabeys.Spontaneous type 2 diabetes mellitus has been well documented in several species of NHP. Because the literature contains little information regarding the clinicopathologic features (the ‘profile’), risk factors, and prevalence of spontaneous diabetes mellitus in sooty mangabeys, the primary aims of the current study were 1) to determine whether elevated levels of fasting blood glucose, fructosamine, HbA1c, triglycerides, and total cholesterol levels are reliable diagnostic markers of type 2 diabetes mellitus in this NHP species; 2) to determine whether age, sex, MPA exposure, and SIV status influence the risk of diabetes; 3) to determine whether body weight influences diabetic status; 4) to evaluate the relationship between pancreatic amyloidosis and diabetes mellitus; and 5) to characterize the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the mangabey population at our institution. To our knowledge, this report is the first to describe the natural occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus within a captive colony of sooty mangabeys. We hypothesized that blood glucose, fructosamine, HbA1c, triglyceride, and total cholesterol would be reliable diagnostic markers and that age, sex, and MPA exposure would influence the risk of diabetes in this species.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.     

Nontransgenic Genome Modification in Plant Cells

Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) are a powerful tool for genome editing in eukaryotic cells. ZFNs have been used for targeted mutagenesis in model and crop species. In animal and human cells, transient ZFN expression is often achieved by direct gene transfer into the target cells. Stable transformation, however, is the preferred method for gene expression in plant species, and ZFN-expressing transgenic plants have been used for recovery of mutants that are likely to be classified as transgenic due to the use of direct gene-transfer methods into the target cells. Here we present an alternative, nontransgenic approach for ZFN delivery and production of mutant plants using a novel Tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based expression system for indirect transient delivery of ZFNs into a variety of tissues and cells of intact plants. TRV systemically infected its hosts and virus ZFN-mediated targeted mutagenesis could be clearly observed in newly developed infected tissues as measured by activation of a mutated reporter transgene in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and petunia (Petunia hybrida) plants. The ability of TRV to move to developing buds and regenerating tissues enabled recovery of mutated tobacco and petunia plants. Sequence analysis and transmission of the mutations to the next generation confirmed the stability of the ZFN-induced genetic changes. Because TRV is an RNA virus that can infect a wide range of plant species, it provides a viable alternative to the production of ZFN-mediated mutants while avoiding the use of direct plant-transformation methods.Methods for genome editing in plant cells have fallen behind the remarkable progress made in whole-genome sequencing projects. The availability of reliable and efficient methods for genome editing would foster gene discovery and functional gene analyses in model plants and the introduction of novel traits in agriculturally important species (Puchta, 2002; Hanin and Paszkowski, 2003; Reiss, 2003; Porteus, 2009). Genome editing in various species is typically achieved by integrating foreign DNA molecules into the target genome by homologous recombination (HR). Genome editing by HR is routine in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells (Scherer and Davis, 1979) and has been adapted for other species, including Drosophila, human cell lines, various fungal species, and mouse embryonic stem cells (Baribault and Kemler, 1989; Venken and Bellen, 2005; Porteus, 2007; Hall et al., 2009; Laible and Alonso-González, 2009; Tenzen et al., 2009). In plants, however, foreign DNA molecules, which are typically delivered by direct gene-transfer methods (e.g. Agrobacterium and microbombardment of plasmid DNA), often integrate into the target cell genome via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and not HR (Ray and Langer, 2002; Britt and May, 2003).Various methods have been developed to indentify and select for rare site-specific foreign DNA integration events or to enhance the rate of HR-mediated DNA integration in plant cells. Novel T-DNA molecules designed to support strong positive- and negative-selection schemes (e.g. Thykjaer et al., 1997; Terada et al., 2002), altering the plant DNA-repair machinery by expressing yeast chromatin remodeling protein (Shaked et al., 2005), and PCR screening of large numbers of transgenic plants (Kempin et al., 1997; Hanin et al., 2001) are just a few of the experimental approaches used to achieve HR-mediated gene targeting in plant species. While successful, these approaches, and others, have resulted in only a limited number of reports describing the successful implementation of HR-mediated gene targeting of native and transgenic sequences in plant cells (for review, see Puchta, 2002; Hanin and Paszkowski, 2003; Reiss, 2003; Porteus, 2009; Weinthal et al., 2010).HR-mediated gene targeting can potentially be enhanced by the induction of genomic double-strand breaks (DSBs). In their pioneering studies, Puchta et al. (1993, 1996) showed that DSB induction by the naturally occurring rare-cutting restriction enzyme I-SceI leads to enhanced HR-mediated DNA repair in plants. Expression of I-SceI and another rare-cutting restriction enzyme (I-CeuI) also led to efficient NHEJ-mediated site-specific mutagenesis and integration of foreign DNA molecules in plants (Salomon and Puchta, 1998; Chilton and Que, 2003; Tzfira et al., 2003). Naturally occurring rare-cutting restriction enzymes thus hold great promise as a tool for genome editing in plant cells (Carroll, 2004; Pâques and Duchateau, 2007). However, their wide application is hindered by the tedious and next to impossible reengineering of such enzymes for novel DNA-target specificities (Pâques and Duchateau, 2007).A viable alternative to the use of rare-cutting restriction enzymes is the zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), which have been used for genome editing in a wide range of eukaryotic species, including plants (e.g. Bibikova et al., 2001; Porteus and Baltimore, 2003; Lloyd et al., 2005; Urnov et al., 2005; Wright et al., 2005; Beumer et al., 2006; Moehle et al., 2007; Santiago et al., 2008; Shukla et al., 2009; Tovkach et al., 2009; Townsend et al., 2009; Osakabe et al., 2010; Petolino et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). Here too, ZFNs have been used to enhance DNA integration via HR (e.g. Shukla et al., 2009; Townsend et al., 2009) and as an efficient tool for the induction of site-specific mutagenesis (e.g. Lloyd et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2010) in plant species. The latter is more efficient and simpler to implement in plants as it does not require codelivery of both ZFN-expressing and donor DNA molecules and it relies on NHEJ—the dominant DNA-repair machinery in most plant species (Ray and Langer, 2002; Britt and May, 2003).ZFNs are artificial restriction enzymes composed of a fusion between an artificial Cys₂His₂ zinc-finger protein DNA-binding domain and the cleavage domain of the FokI endonuclease. The DNA-binding domain of ZFNs can be engineered to recognize a variety of DNA sequences (for review, see Durai et al., 2005; Porteus and Carroll, 2005; Carroll et al., 2006). The FokI endonuclease domain functions as a dimer, and digestion of the target DNA requires proper alignment of two ZFN monomers at the target site (Durai et al., 2005; Porteus and Carroll, 2005; Carroll et al., 2006). Efficient and coordinated expression of both monomers is thus required for the production of DSBs in living cells. Transient ZFN expression, by direct gene delivery, is the method of choice for targeted mutagenesis in human and animal cells (e.g. Urnov et al., 2005; Beumer et al., 2006; Meng et al., 2008). Among the different methods used for high and efficient transient ZFN delivery in animal and human cell lines are plasmid injection (Morton et al., 2006; Foley et al., 2009), direct plasmid transfer (Urnov et al., 2005), the use of integrase-defective lentiviral vectors (Lombardo et al., 2007), and mRNA injection (Takasu et al., 2010).In plant species, however, efficient and strong gene expression is often achieved by stable gene transformation. Both transient and stable ZFN expression have been used in gene-targeting experiments in plants (Lloyd et al., 2005; Wright et al., 2005; Maeder et al., 2008; Cai et al., 2009; de Pater et al., 2009; Shukla et al., 2009; Tovkach et al., 2009; Townsend et al., 2009; Osakabe et al., 2010; Petolino et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). In all cases, direct gene-transformation methods, using polyethylene glycol, silicon carbide whiskers, or Agrobacterium, were deployed. Thus, while mutant plants and tissues could be recovered, potentially without any detectable traces of foreign DNA, such plants were generated using a transgenic approach and are therefore still likely to be classified as transgenic. Furthermore, the recovery of mutants in many cases is also dependent on the ability to regenerate plants from protoplasts, a procedure that has only been successfully applied in a limited number of plant species. Therefore, while ZFN technology is a powerful tool for site-specific mutagenesis, its wider implementation for plant improvement may be somewhat limited, both by its restriction to certain plant species and by legislative restrictions imposed on transgenic plants.Here we describe an alternative to direct gene transfer for ZFN delivery and for the production of mutated plants. Our approach is based on the use of a novel Tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based expression system, which is capable of systemically infecting its host and spreading into a variety of tissues and cells of intact plants, including developing buds and regenerating tissues. We traced the indirect ZFN delivery in infected plants by activation of a mutated reporter gene and we demonstrate that this approach can be used to recover mutated plants.     

Implication of different domains of the Leishmania major metacaspase in cell death and autophagy

Metacaspases (MCAs) are cysteine peptidases expressed in plants, fungi and protozoa, with a caspase-like histidine–cysteine catalytic dyad, but differing from caspases, for example, in their substrate specificity. The role of MCAs is subject to debate: roles in cell cycle control, in cell death or even in cell survival have been suggested. In this study, using a Leishmania major MCA-deficient strain, we showed that L. major MCA (LmjMCA) not only had a role similar to caspases in cell death but also in autophagy and this through different domains. Upon cell death induction by miltefosine or H₂O₂, LmjMCA is processed, releasing the catalytic domain, which activated substrates via its catalytic dyad His/Cys and a proline-rich C-terminal domain. The C-terminal domain interacted with proteins, notably proteins involved in stress regulation, such as the MAP kinase LmaMPK7 or programmed cell death like the calpain-like cysteine peptidase. We also showed a new role of LmjMCA in autophagy, acting on or upstream of ATG8, involving Lmjmca gene overexpression and interaction of the C-terminal domain of LmjMCA with itself and other proteins. These results allowed us to propose two models, showing the role of LmjMCA in the cell death and also in the autophagy pathway, implicating different protein domains.Apoptosis is, in most cases, associated with and depends on the activation of cys-dependent peptidases, named caspases.^{1, 2} Once activated, initiator caspases induce a proteolytic cascade via the activation of effector caspases that ultimately cleave numerous substrates, thereby causing the typical morphological features of apoptosis.^{3, 4} Despite their essential role in apoptosis, caspases are also involved in non-apoptotic events, including inflammation, cell proliferation, cell differentiation⁵ and the cell survival process autophagy, a major catabolic process in eukaryotic cells that allows cells to survive nutrient starvation due to engulfment of a portion of the cytoplasm by a specific membrane, delivery to lysosomes or vacuoles and digestion by hydrolytic enzymes.^{6, 7, 8, 9, 10} Plants, fungi and protozoa are devoid of caspases but express metacaspases (MCAs).¹¹MCAs are cysteine peptidases of the clan CD, family 14, with a caspase-like histidine–cysteine catalytic dyad.^{12, 13} However, besides their distant similarity to caspases,¹⁴ MCAs prefer arginine/lysine in the P1 position, whereas caspases prefer aspartic residues.^{15, 16} The role of MCAs in cell death is still enigmatic. For example, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, YCA1 has a role in cell death,^{17, 18} whereas, although only partly dependent on its conserved catalytic cysteine, it also facilitates the removal of unfolded proteins, prolonging cellular life span.¹⁹ Similarly, some metacaspases have roles, outside of death, in stress acclimation pathways, as in Aspergillus fumigatus²⁰ or in the unicellular planctonic organisms diatoms.^{21, 22} In Arabidopsis thaliana, AtMC1 is a positive regulator of cell death and a survival factor for aging plants,²³ whereas AtMC2 negatively regulates cell death.²⁴ Trypanosoma brucei TbMCA2, TbMCA3 and TbMCA5 and Leishmania major MCA are involved in cell cycle regulation.^{25, 26}Leishmania are parasitic protozoa responsible for the neglected tropical disease leishmaniasis, transmitted to humans by the bite of the sand fly. In the insect, parasites proliferate as free-living flagellated forms called procyclic promastigotes within the midgut before differentiating into virulent metacyclic promastigotes and migrating to the proboscis.^{27, 28} In the mammalian host, promastigotes are taken up by macrophages and transform into amastigotes. Under a variety of stress stimuli, apoptosis-like morphological and biochemical features have been described in Leishmania, among which are cell shrinkage, chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation or mitochondrial depolarization.^{29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38} Despite the evidence of morphological and biochemical markers of cell death in dying Leishmania, very little is known about the cell death pathway and the implicated executioner proteins. Indeed, essential proteins involved in mammalian apoptosis, death receptors, small pro- and anti-apoptotic molecules and caspases, are apparently not encoded in the genome of Leishmania³⁹ and the role of Leishmania MCA in cell death is still controversial, certain authors suggesting a role as a negative regulator of intracellular amastigote proliferation, instead of having a caspase-like role in the execution of cell death.⁴⁰LmjMCA contains different domains: an N-terminal domain with a Mitochondrion Localization Signal (MLS),⁴¹ a caspase-like catalytic domain and a C-terminal proline-rich domain.⁴¹ On the basis of this domain structure, LmjMCA can be classified among the type I metacaspases,¹⁶ a subclass more generally defined in higher plants and characterized by the presence of an N-terminal prodomain and a short linker between the large and small subunits, as initiator caspases in metazoans.¹¹ Upon induction of cell death by heat shock, H₂O₂ or drugs like miltefosine or curcumin, LmjMCA is processed and the catalytic domain is released,⁴¹ liberating the C-terminal domain. It was therefore interesting to investigate the functional roles of the different domains.In this report, we studied the role of L. major MCA (LmjMCA), using an MCA-deficient strain and overexpressing independently the catalytic and the C-terminal domains. The results confirmed that MCA was not essential to L. major survival. In contrast, LmjMCA processing, releasing its catalytic and C-terminal domains, induced cell death in L. major, whereas the overexpression of Lmjmca gene triggered autophagy after interaction of the C-terminal domain with itself and with other proteins, acting on or upstream of the autophagic protein ATG8.     

ORM Expression Alters Sphingolipid Homeostasis and Differentially Affects Ceramide Synthase Activity

Sphingolipid synthesis is tightly regulated in eukaryotes. This regulation in plants ensures sufficient sphingolipids to support growth while limiting the accumulation of sphingolipid metabolites that induce programmed cell death. Serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) catalyzes the first step in sphingolipid biosynthesis and is considered the primary sphingolipid homeostatic regulatory point. In this report, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) putative SPT regulatory proteins, orosomucoid-like proteins AtORM1 and AtORM2, were found to interact physically with Arabidopsis SPT and to suppress SPT activity when coexpressed with Arabidopsis SPT subunits long-chain base1 (LCB1) and LCB2 and the small subunit of SPT in a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) SPT-deficient mutant. Consistent with a role in SPT suppression, AtORM1 and AtORM2 overexpression lines displayed increased resistance to the programmed cell death-inducing mycotoxin fumonisin B₁, with an accompanying reduced accumulation of LCBs and C16 fatty acid-containing ceramides relative to wild-type plants. Conversely, RNA interference (RNAi) suppression lines of AtORM1 and AtORM2 displayed increased sensitivity to fumonisin B₁ and an accompanying strong increase in LCBs and C16 fatty acid-containing ceramides relative to wild-type plants. Overexpression lines also were found to have reduced activity of the class I ceramide synthase that uses C16 fatty acid acyl-coenzyme A and dihydroxy LCB substrates but increased activity of class II ceramide synthases that use very-long-chain fatty acyl-coenzyme A and trihydroxy LCB substrates. RNAi suppression lines, in contrast, displayed increased class I ceramide synthase activity but reduced class II ceramide synthase activity. These findings indicate that ORM mediation of SPT activity differentially regulates functionally distinct ceramide synthase activities as part of a broader sphingolipid homeostatic regulatory network.Sphingolipids play critical roles in plant growth and development as essential components of endomembranes, including the plasma membrane, where they constitute more than 40% of the total lipid (Sperling et al., 2005; Cacas et al., 2016). Sphingolipids also are highly enriched in detergent-insoluble membrane fractions of the plasma membrane that form microdomains for proteins with important cell surface activities, including cell wall biosynthesis and hormone transport (Cacas et al., 2012, 2016; Perraki et al., 2012; Bayer et al., 2014). In addition, sphingolipids, particularly those with very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs), are integrally associated with Golgi-mediated protein trafficking that underlies processes related to the growth of plant cells (Bach et al., 2008, 2011; Markham et al., 2011; Melser et al., 2011). Furthermore, sphingolipids function through their bioactive long-chain base (LCB) and ceramide metabolites to initiate programmed cell death (PCD), important for mediating plant pathogen resistance through the hypersensitive response (Greenberg et al., 2000; Liang et al., 2003; Shi et al., 2007; Bi et al., 2014; Simanshu et al., 2014).Sphingolipid biosynthesis is highly regulated in all eukaryotes. In plants, the maintenance of sphingolipid homeostasis is vital to ensure sufficient sphingolipids for growth (Chen et al., 2006; Kimberlin et al., 2013) while restricting the accumulation of PCD-inducing ceramides and LCBs until required for processes such as the pathogen-triggered hypersensitive response. Serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT), which catalyzes the first step in LCB synthesis, is generally believed to be the primary control point for sphingolipid homeostasis (Hanada, 2003). SPT synthesizes LCBs, unique components of sphingolipids, by catalyzing a pyridoxal phosphate-dependent condensation of Ser and palmitoyl (16:0)-CoA in plants (Markham et al., 2013). Similar to other eukaryotes, the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) SPT is a heterodimer consisting of LCB1 and LCB2 subunits (Chen et al., 2006; Dietrich et al., 2008; Teng et al., 2008). Research to date has shown that SPT is regulated primarily by posttranslational mechanisms involving physical interactions with noncatalytic, membrane-associated proteins that confer positive and negative regulation of SPT activity (Han et al., 2009, 2010; Breslow et al., 2010). These proteins include a 56-amino acid small subunit of SPT (ssSPT) in Arabidopsis, which was recently shown to stimulate SPT activity and to be essential for generating sufficient amounts of sphingolipids for pollen and sporophytic cell viability (Kimberlin et al., 2013).Evidence from yeast and mammalian research points to a more critical role for proteins termed ORMs (for orosomucoid-like proteins) in sphingolipid homeostatic regulation (Breslow et al., 2010; Han et al., 2010). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Orm1p and Orm2p negatively regulate SPT through reversible phosphorylation of these polypeptides in response to intracellular sphingolipid levels (Breslow et al., 2010; Han et al., 2010; Roelants et al., 2011; Gururaj et al., 2013; Muir et al., 2014). Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of ORMs in S. cerevisiae presumably affects the higher order assembly of SPT to mediate flux through this enzyme for LCB synthesis (Breslow, 2013). In this sphingolipid homeostatic regulatory mechanism, the S. cerevisiae Orm1p and Orm2p are phosphorylated at their N termini by Ypk1, a TORC2-dependent protein kinase (Han et al., 2010; Roelants et al., 2011). The absence of this phosphorylation domain in mammalian and plant ORM homologs brings into question the nature of SPT reversible regulation by ORMs in other eukaryotic systems (Hjelmqvist et al., 2002).Sphingolipid synthesis also is mediated by the N-acylation of LCBs by ceramide synthases to form ceramides, the hydrophobic backbone of the major plant glycosphingolipids, glucosylceramide (GlcCer) and glycosyl inositolphosphoceramide (GIPC). Two functionally distinct classes of ceramide synthases occur in Arabidopsis, designated class I and class II (Chen et al., 2008). Class I ceramide synthase activity resulting from the Longevity Assurance Gene One Homolog2 (LOH2)-encoded ceramide synthase acylates, almost exclusively, LCBs containing two hydroxyl groups (dihydroxy LCBs) with 16:0-CoA to form C16 ceramides, which are used primarily for GlcCer synthesis (Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011; Luttgeharm et al., 2016). Class II ceramide synthase activities resulting from the LOH1- and LOH3-encoded ceramide synthases are most active in the acylation of LCBs containing three hydroxyl groups (trihydroxy LCBs) with VLCFA-CoAs, including primarily C₂₄ and C₂₆ acyl-CoAs (Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011; Luttgeharm et al., 2016). Class II (LOH1 and LOH3) ceramide synthase activity is essential for producing VLCFA-containing glycosphingolipids to support the growth of plant cells, whereas class I (LOH2) ceramide synthase activity is nonessential under normal growth conditions (Markham et al., 2011; Luttgeharm et al., 2015b). It was speculated recently that LOH2 ceramide synthase functions, in part, as a safety valve to acylate excess LCBs for glycosylation, resulting in a less cytotoxic form (Luttgeharm et al., 2015b; Msanne et al., 2015). Recent studies have shown that the Lag1/Lac1 components of the S. cerevisiae ceramide synthase are phosphorylated by Ypk1, and this phosphorylation stimulates ceramide synthase activity in response to heat and reduced intracellular sphingolipid levels (Muir et al., 2014). This finding points to possible coordinated regulation of ORM-mediated SPT and ceramide synthase activities to regulate sphingolipid homeostasis, which is likely more complicated in plants and mammals due to the occurrence of functionally distinct ceramide synthases in these systems (Stiban et al., 2010; Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011; Luttgeharm et al., 2016).RNA interference (RNAi) suppression of ORM genes in rice (Oryza sativa) has been shown to affect pollen viability (Chueasiri et al., 2014), but no mechanistic characterization of ORM proteins in plants has yet to be reported. Here, we describe two Arabidopsis ORMs, AtORM1 and AtORM2, that suppress SPT activity through direct interaction with the LCB1/LCB2 heterodimer. We also show that strong up-regulation of AtORM expression impairs growth. In addition, up- or down-regulation of ORMs is shown to differentially affect the sensitivity of Arabidopsis to the PCD-inducing mycotoxin fumonisin B₁ (FB₁), a ceramide synthase inhibitor, and to differentially affect the activities of class I and II ceramide synthases as a possible additional mechanism for regulating sphingolipid homeostasis.     

Wettability,Polarity, and Water Absorption of Holm Oak Leaves: Effect of Leaf Side and Age

Plant trichomes play important protective functions and may have a major influence on leaf surface wettability. With the aim of gaining insight into trichome structure, composition, and function in relation to water-plant surface interactions, we analyzed the adaxial and abaxial leaf surface of holm oak (Quercus ilex) as a model. By measuring the leaf water potential 24 h after the deposition of water drops onto abaxial and adaxial surfaces, evidence for water penetration through the upper leaf side was gained in young and mature leaves. The structure and chemical composition of the abaxial (always present) and adaxial (occurring only in young leaves) trichomes were analyzed by various microscopic and analytical procedures. The adaxial surfaces were wettable and had a high degree of water drop adhesion in contrast to the highly unwettable and water-repellent abaxial holm oak leaf sides. The surface free energy and solubility parameter decreased with leaf age, with higher values determined for the adaxial sides. All holm oak leaf trichomes were covered with a cuticle. The abaxial trichomes were composed of 8% soluble waxes, 49% cutin, and 43% polysaccharides. For the adaxial side, it is concluded that trichomes and the scars after trichome shedding contribute to water uptake, while the abaxial leaf side is highly hydrophobic due to its high degree of pubescence and different trichome structure, composition, and density. Results are interpreted in terms of water-plant surface interactions, plant surface physical chemistry, and plant ecophysiology.Plant surfaces have an important protecting function against multiple biotic and abiotic stress factors (Riederer, 2006). They may, for example, limit the attack of insects (Eigenbrode and Jetter, 2002) or pathogenic fungi (Gniwotta et al., 2005; Łaźniewska et al., 2012), avoid damage caused by high intensities of UV and visible radiation (Reicosky and Hanover, 1978; Karabourniotis and Bormann, 1999), help to regulate leaf temperature (Ehleringer and Björkman, 1978; Ripley et al., 1999), and chiefly prevent plant organs from dehydration (Riederer and Schreiber, 2001).The epidermis of plants has been found to have a major degree of physical and chemical variability and may often contain specialized cells such as trichomes or stomata (Roth-Nebelsick et al., 2009; Javelle et al., 2011). Most aerial organs are covered with an extracellular and generally lipid-rich layer named the cuticle, which is typically composed of waxes embedded in (intracuticular waxes) or deposited on (epicuticular waxes) a biopolymer matrix of cutin, forming a network of cross-esterified hydroxy C₁₆ and/or C₁₈ fatty acids, and/or cutan, with variable amounts of polysaccharides and phenolics (Domínguez et al., 2011; Yeats and Rose, 2013). Different nano- and/or microscale levels of plant surface sculpturing have been observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), generally in relation to the topography of epicuticular waxes, cuticular folds, and epidermal cells (Koch and Barthlott, 2009). Such surface features together with their chemical composition (Khayet and Fernández, 2012) may lead to a high degree of roughness and hydrophobicity (Koch and Barthlott, 2009; Konrad et al., 2012). The interactions of plant surfaces with water have been addressed in some investigations (Brewer et al., 1991; Brewer and Smith, 1997; Pandey and Nagar, 2003; Hanba et al., 2004; Dietz et al., 2007; Holder, 2007a, 2007b; Fernández et al., 2011, 2014; Roth-Nebelsick et al., 2012; Wen et al., 2012; Urrego-Pereira et al., 2013) and are a topic of growing interest for plant ecophysiology (Helliker and Griffiths, 2007; Aryal and Neuner, 2010; Limm and Dawson, 2010; Kim and Lee, 2011; Berry and Smith, 2012; Berry et al., 2013; Rosado and Holder, 2013; Helliker, 2014). On the other hand, the mechanisms of foliar uptake of water and solutes by plant surfaces are still not fully understood (Fernández and Eichert, 2009; Burkhardt and Hunsche, 2013), but they may play an important ecophysiological role (Limm et al., 2009; Johnstone and Dawson, 2010; Adamec, 2013; Berry et al., 2014).The importance of trichomes and pubescent layers on water drop-plant surface interactions and on the subsequent potential water uptake into the organs has been analyzed in some investigations (Fahn, 1986; Brewer et al., 1991; Grammatikopoulos and Manetas, 1994; Brewer and Smith, 1997; Pierce et al., 2001; Kenzo et al., 2008; Fernández et al., 2011, 2014; Burrows et al., 2013). Trichomes are unicellular or multicellular and glandular or nonglandular appendages, which originate from epidermal cells only and develop outwards on the surface of plant organs (Werker, 2000). Nonglandular trichomes are categorized according to their morphology and exhibit a major variability in size, morphology, and function. On the other hand, glandular trichomes are classified by the secretory materials they excrete, accumulate, or absorb (Johnson, 1975; Werker, 2000; Wagner et al., 2004). Trichomes can be often found in xeromorphic leaves and in young organs (Fahn, 1986; Karabourniotis et al., 1995). The occurrence of protecting leaf trichomes has been also reported for Mediterranean species such as holm oak (Quercus ilex; Karabourniotis et al., 1995, 1998; Morales et al., 2002; Karioti et al., 2011; Camarero et al., 2012). There is limited information about the nature of the surface of trichomes, but they are also covered with a cuticle similarly to other epidermal cell types (Fernández et al., 2011, 2014).In this study and using holm oak as a model, we assessed, for the first time, the leaf surface-water relations of the abaxial (always pubescent) versus the adaxial (only pubescent in developing leaves and for a few months) surface, including their capacity to absorb surface-deposited water drops. Based on membrane science methodologies (Fernández et al., 2011; Khayet and Fernández, 2012) and following a new integrative approach, the chemical, physical, and anatomical properties of holm oak leaf surfaces and trichomes were analyzed, with the aim of addressing the following questions. Are young and mature adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces capable of absorbing water deposited as drops on to the surfaces? Are young and mature abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces similar in relation to their wettability, hydrophobicity, polarity, work of adhesion (W_a) for water, solubility parameter (δ), and surface free energy (γ)? What is the physical and chemical nature of the adaxial versus the abaxial trichomes, chiefly in relation to young leaves?     

Mer receptor tyrosine kinase mediates both tethering and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells

Billions of inflammatory leukocytes die and are phagocytically cleared each day. This regular renewal facilitates the normal termination of inflammatory responses, suppressing pro-inflammatory mediators and inducing their anti-inflammatory counterparts. Here we investigate the role of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) Mer and its ligands Protein S and Gas6 in the initial recognition and capture of apoptotic cells (ACs) by macrophages. We demonstrate extremely rapid binding kinetics of both ligands to phosphatidylserine (PtdSer)-displaying ACs, and show that ACs can be co-opsonized with multiple PtdSer opsonins. We further show that macrophage phagocytosis of ACs opsonized with Mer ligands can occur independently of a requirement for αV integrins. Finally, we demonstrate a novel role for Mer in the tethering of ACs to the macrophage surface, and show that Mer-mediated tethering and subsequent AC engulfment can be distinguished by their requirement for Mer kinase activity. Our results identify Mer as a receptor uniquely capable of both tethering ACs to the macrophage surface and driving their subsequent internalization.Many diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, pulmonary fibrosis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and inflammatory bowel disease,^{1, 2, 3, 4} are commonly marked by impaired resolution of inflammation that is linked to defects in the phagocytic clearance of apoptotic cells.^{5, 6, 7} Apoptotic cell (AC) clearance normally eliminates a plethora of pro-inflammatory stimuli,^{8, 9} and the recognition of ACs by phagocytes¹⁰ limits progression to necrosis,¹¹ suppresses pro-inflammatory mediator production, and induces IL-10 and TGF-β release.^{12, 13} As defective clearance of ACs is associated with the development of inflammatory disease and autoimmunity,^{14, 15} new therapeutic approaches designed to increase the capacity of phagocytes to remove ACs could effectively promote the resolution of inflammation.Phagocytosis of ACs can be regulated by soluble mediators, including cytokines,^{16, 17} prostaglandins and lipoxins,^{17, 18, 19} serum proteins,²⁰ agonists of Liver X receptors (LXRs),^{17, 21} and glucocorticoids (GC).^{17, 22} In particular, LXR agonists and GCs promote phagocytosis of ACs predominantly via a Tyro3/Axl/Mer (TAM) receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-dependent pathway.^{17, 21, 23} There are two established ligands for the TAM RTKs, Protein S (gene name Pros1), which activates Tyro3 and Mer, and Gas6, which activates all three TAMs,^{24, 25} although other ligands have been suggested.^{26, 27} The amino terminal Gla domains of Protein S and Gas6 bind to phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) on the plasma membrane of ACs,²⁸ a potent ‘eat-me'' signal by which ACs are recognized by phagocytes.²⁹ TAM receptors bind to the carboxy terminal domains of Protein S and Gas6, which effectively act as molecular ‘bridges'' between PtdSer on the AC and TAM receptors on the phagocyte.^{17, 30, 31} TAM receptor- and ligand-deficient mice exhibit defective phagocytic pruning of photoreceptor outer segments by retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells of the eye,^{32, 33, 34} defective clearance of apoptotic germ cells by Sertoli cells of the testis,³⁵ and defective clearance of ACs by macrophages/dendritic cells in lymphoid organs.³⁶ These phenotypes are also detectable in Mer (gene name Mertk) single knockouts.³⁷ In addition to phagocytic clearance, TAM signaling also has a pivotal role in controlling the innate immune response to pathogenic stimuli.^{13, 17, 38}Although the importance of Mer in the internalization of ACs by macrophages is now well-established, this receptor has been thought not to have a significant role in the initial ‘tethering'' of ACs to the macrophage surface.^{36, 39} In their studies, Scott et al.³⁶ used peritoneal macrophages for which tethering of ACs has now been shown to be mediated by T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing molecule 4 (TIM4).³⁹ Subsequent internalization of tethered ACs is then mediated by either integrin αvβ3- or Mer-mediated signaling.^{39, 40} Similarly, for RPE cells, the initial capture of photoreceptor outer segments by RPE cells required the integrin αvβ5,⁴¹ with Mer-dependent signaling necessary for subsequent internalization. To further probe the mechanistic role of Mer in AC recognition and engulfment, we have now examined macrophages that predominantly use a Mer-dependent AC phagocytosis mechanism.^{17, 23} We show that in these cells, which do not express TIM4, Mer has the capacity to serve a unique dual role in mediating both tethering of ACs to the macrophage surface as well as subsequent AC engulfment.