Pseudotyping Incompatibility between HIV-1 and Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus Env Is Modulated by Vpu

The Env protein from gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been shown to be incompatible with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in the production of infectious pseudotyped particles. This incompatibility has been mapped to the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env. Surprisingly, we found that the HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu modulates this incompatibility. The infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with murine leukemia virus (MLV) Env was not affected by Vpu. However, the infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with an MLV Env with the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env (MLV/GaLV Env) was restricted 50- to 100-fold by Vpu. A Vpu mutant containing a scrambled membrane-spanning domain, Vpu_RD, was still able to restrict MLV/GaLV Env, but mutation of the serine residues at positions 52 and 56 completely alleviated the restriction. Loss of infectivity appeared to be caused by reduced MLV/GaLV Env incorporation into viral particles. The mechanism of this downmodulation appears to be distinct from Vpu-mediated CD4 downmodulation because Vpu-expressing cells that failed to produce infectious HIV-1 particles nonetheless continued to display robust surface MLV/GaLV Env expression. In addition, if MLV and HIV-1 were simultaneously introduced into the same cells, only the HIV-1 particle infectivity was restricted by Vpu. Collectively, these data suggest that Vpu modulates the cellular distribution of MLV/GaLV Env, preventing its recruitment to HIV-1 budding sites.The gammaretrovirus gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been widely used for gene therapy because of its wide host cell tropism and nonpathogenicity (1, 6, 10, 12, 13, 20). The host cell receptor for GaLV Env has been cloned and identified as a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter protein (25, 26). Like other retroviruses, GaLV encodes a single transmembrane surface glycoprotein (GaLV Env), which is cleaved into surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM) subunits (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The TM domain of GaLV Env contains a short 30-amino-acid C-terminal cytoplasmic tail. Although GaLV Env functions well when coupled (pseudotyped) with murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based retroviral vectors, it has been shown to be completely incompatible with HIV-1 (4, 35). When GaLV Env is expressed with HIV-1, essentially no infectious HIV-1 particles are produced (4, 35). The mechanism for this infectivity downmodulation is unknown, but the component of GaLV Env responsible for the restriction has been mapped to the cytoplasmic tail. Replacing the cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env with the equivalent sequence from MLV Env ameliorates the restriction. Likewise, replacing the cytoplasmic tail of MLV Env with that from GaLV Env confers the restriction (4).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic of MLV Env protein. Sequences are the C-terminal cytoplasmic tails of MLV Env, GaLV Env, and human CD4. GaLV sequences in boldface are residues that have been shown to modulate the HIV-1 incompatibility (4). Underlined sequences in CD4 are amino acids required for Vpu-mediated downmodulation (2, 15). Arrows denote the location of MLV/GaLV tail substitution. SU, surface domain; TM, transmembrane domain.Vpu is an 81-amino-acid HIV-1 accessory protein produced from the same mRNA as the HIV-1 Env gene. The N terminus of Vpu contains a membrane-spanning domain, followed by a 50-amino-acid cytoplasmic domain. Vpu is unique to HIV-1 and a few closely related SIV strains. The best-characterized roles for Vpu in the HIV-1 life cycle are modulation of host proteins CD4 and tetherin (also known as BST-2, CD317, and HM1.24) (24, 38, 39). Vpu promotes the degradation of CD4 in the endoplasmic reticulum through a proteasome-dependent mechanism (29). The cytoplasmic tail of Vpu physically interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 and recruits the human β-transducing repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP) and E3 ubiquitin ligase components to polyubiquitinate and ultimately trigger the degradation of CD4 (18). Two serine residues at positions 52 and 56 of Vpu are phosphorylated by casein kinase-2 and are required for CD4 degradation (31, 32). The membrane-spanning domain of Vpu is not specifically required for CD4 degradation. A mutant protein containing a scrambled membrane-spanning sequence, Vpu_RD, is still able to trigger the degradation of CD4 (32). The region of CD4 that is targeted by Vpu is approximately 17 to 13 amino acids from the C terminus in the cytoplasmic tail (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (2, 15).In addition to degrading CD4, Vpu has also long been known to result in enhanced viral release (EVR) in certain cell lines (14, 36). Recently, the type I interferon-induced host protein tetherin was identified as being responsible for this Vpu-modulated restriction (24, 38). In the absence of Vpu, tetherin causes particles to remain tethered (hence the name) to the host cell postfission. Although Vpu counteracts the function of tetherin, the exact mechanism has not been fully elucidated. However, the mechanism for tetherin antagonism appears to be distinct from that for modulating CD4. Mutation of the serines 52 and 56 of Vpu abolish CD4 degradation, but only reduce EVR activity (5, 17, 21, 32). Some EVR activity remains even when much of the Vpu cytoplasmic tail is deleted (30). In addition, many mutations in the membrane-spanning domain, such as Vpu_RD, do not affect CD4 degradation and yet completely abolish EVR activity (27, 30, 37). The critical residues in tetherin for recognition by Vpu appear to be in the membrane-spanning domain and not the cytoplasmic tail (9, 19, 28). Although β-TrCP is required for complete EVR activity, there is no consensus whether the degradation of tetherin is proteasome or lysosome mediated (5, 7, 21) or whether degradation is required at all. In some cases there can be some EVR activity in the absence of tetherin degradation (17, 22).We demonstrate here that Vpu is responsible for the incompatibility between HIV-1 and GaLV Env. Glycoproteins containing the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env are prevented from being incorporated into HIV-1 particles by Vpu, effectively reducing infectious particle production by 50- to 100-fold. The serines at positions 52 and 56 are required for this restriction, but the membrane-spanning domain is not. Although the mechanism for this restriction appears similar to CD4 degradation, there are apparent differences. Vpu does not prevent surface expression, and it does not prevent its incorporation into MLV particles. Therefore, the mechanism of restriction appears to involve a system that does not rely directly on global protein degradation.     

Evaluation of CD4-CD4i Antibody Architectures Yields Potent,Broadly Cross-Reactive Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Reagents

The envelope glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has several adaptations that allow the virus to evade antibody neutralization. Nevertheless, a few broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies as well as reagents containing portions of CD4, the HIV receptor, have demonstrated partial efficacy in suppressing viral replication. One type of reagent designed for improved HIV neutralization fuses the CD4 D1-D2 domains to the variable regions of an antibody recognizing the CD4-induced (CD4i) coreceptor binding site on the gp120 portion of the HIV envelope spike. We designed, expressed, purified, and tested the neutralization potencies of CD4-CD4i antibody reagents with different architectures, antibody combining sites, and linkers. We found that fusing CD4 to the heavy chain of the CD4i antibody E51 yields a bivalent reagent including an antibody Fc region that expresses well, is expected to have a long serum half-life, and has comparable or greater neutralization activity than well-known broadly neutralizing anti-HIV antibodies. A CD4 fusion with the anti-HIV carbohydrate antibody 2G12 also results in a potent neutralizing reagent with more broadly neutralizing activity than 2G12 alone.The envelope spike of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), a trimer of gp120/gp41 heterodimers, utilizes a number of strategies to avoid antibodies (Abs) elicited by the humoral immune response. These include variable loops, heavy glycosylation (36), conformational masking of key functional sites (19), and an architecture and surface density that reduce bivalent Ab engagement (18). Nevertheless, a small number of broadly cross-reactive neutralizing Abs have been found and extensively characterized (5, 32, 41). The targets of these Abs include the membrane proximal region of gp41 (24, 42), a cluster of high-mannose carbohydrates on gp120 (29), and the HIV receptor (CD4)-binding site (3, 28). A combination of several of these Abs has been evaluated in clinical trials as a passive immunotherapy to reduce viral rebound during an interruption of antiretroviral therapy (34).Several CD4-containing proteins have also been explored clinically as possible therapeutics for treating HIV-1: soluble CD4 (13, 16), a CD4-Fc fusion protein (7), and the tetravalent CD4-immunoglobulin G2 (CD4-IgG2; PRO 542) reagent (1, 17). In patients with advanced disease, CD4-IgG2 treatment led to a ∼0.5 log₁₀ mean reduction in viral load (17). In addition, D1D2-Igαtp, an approximately dodecameric CD4 reagent created as a chimeric IgG1/IgA fusion protein (2), exhibited very potent HIV neutralization activity and targeted HIV-infected cells for lysis by natural killer cells (14).Another approach to targeting gp120 is a fusion protein composed of CD4 linked to the variable regions of a CD4-induced (CD4i) Ab (11). CD4i Abs represent a potentially promising class of Abs because they bind to the conserved HIV-1 coreceptor binding site on gp120, which is exposed after a conformational change resulting from binding to CD4 (25, 27, 38). Examples of CD4i Abs include 17b (33), E51 (39), m9 (40), 412d (8), and 21c (38). These Abs are often broadly cross-reactive but generally show little neutralization potency in vivo due to limited steric accessibility when gp120 on the viral membrane is bound to CD4 on the surface of the target cell (20). Fusing CD4 to the combining site of a CD4i Ab solves the accessibility problem since the Ab epitope would be exposed by CD4 binding when the virion is not bound to the target cell. This class of reagent has two other favorable features: bivalent binding and targeting of functionally critical epitopes on gp120, the CD4 and coreceptor binding sites. One such reagent, sCD4-17b (referred to here as CD4-scFv_17b), contains the first two domains of CD4 linked to the single-chain fragment variable (scFv) form of the CD4i Ab 17b (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (11). This reagent was shown to potently neutralize multiple primary strains of HIV-1 (11), suggesting that CD4-CD4i Ab fusion proteins are promising candidates for passive immunization or gene therapy trials.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic depiction of CD4-CD4i reagents and related molecules. V_H, variable domain of the IgG heavy chain (HC); V_L, variable domain of the IgG light chain (LC), C_H1, constant region 1 of the HC; C_L, constant region of the LC; Fc, C_H2 and C_H3 domains of dimerized HCs; CD4 D1-D2, N-terminal two domains of CD4; scFv, single-chain fragment variable (V_H and V_L domains of an IgG); CD4_HC, CD4 linked to the V_H domain of an IgG; CD4_LC, CD4 linked to the V_L domain of an IgG; CD4_HC,LC, CD4 linked to the V_H and V_L domains of an IgG.Critical properties for CD4-containing reagents include their breadth of neutralization activity, half-life, and, for reagents used in a gene therapy context, their expression level. We have undertaken a systematic effort to develop the optimal architecture for a CD4-CD4i Ab reagent by designing, constructing, and testing reagents with different CD4i Ab combining sites and including an Ab Fc region to increase valency and serum half-life (7). We varied the arrangements of the Ab combining sites; the lengths, attachments, and forms of the linking regions; and the ways in which CD4 was fused to the CD4i Ab (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). CD4-CD4i Ab reagents were evaluated using in vitro neutralization assays across a broad range of clade A, B, and C HIV-1 strains. One promising reagent, a fusion of CD4 domains 1 and 2 (D1-D2) to the heavy chain of the E51 CD4i Ab, was expressed at high levels in mammalian cells and exhibited neutralization potencies that compared favorably with or exceeded those of known broadly neutralizing Abs such as 4E10, b12, 2G12, and 2F5.Since much of the activity of our CD4-CD4i reagents resulted from the CD4 component, we also explored the effects of attaching CD4 to an Ab with a different quaternary structure. The anticarbohydrate Ab 2G12 is unusual in that its heavy chains are involved in a domain swap creating a rigid (Fab)₂ unit in which the combining sites are separated by ∼35Å (6). This domain swapping tendency also leads to the formation of 2G12 dimers containing two (Fab)₂ units and two Fc regions, which form when the domain swapping occurs intermolecularly between two IgGs rather than intramolecularly between the two Fab arms of a single IgG (37). The 2G12 dimer is 50- to 80-fold more potent than monomeric 2G12 in neutralizing clade B 2G12-sensitive strains; however, neither form of 2G12 neutralizes clade C strains of HIV-1 (37). In order to assess the effects of adding CD4 to the 2G12 monomer and dimer architectures and to explore whether addition of CD4 would broaden the range of HIV-1 strains that are sensitive to 2G12, we constructed CD4-2G12 fusion proteins and tested their neutralization potencies (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). We found that these hybrid reagents had potent neutralizing activities with both the CD4 and Ab combining site components apparently contributing to this behavior.     

Cell-Cell Spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Overcomes Tetherin/BST-2-Mediated Restriction in T cells

Direct cell-to-cell spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) between T cells at the virological synapse (VS) is an efficient mechanism of viral dissemination. Tetherin (BST-2/CD317) is an interferon-induced, antiretroviral restriction factor that inhibits nascent cell-free particle release. The HIV-1 Vpu protein antagonizes tetherin activity; however, whether tetherin also restricts cell-cell spread is unclear. We performed quantitative cell-to-cell transfer analysis of wild-type (WT) or Vpu-defective HIV-1 in Jurkat and primary CD4⁺ T cells, both of which express endogenous levels of tetherin. We found that Vpu-defective HIV-1 appeared to disseminate more efficiently by cell-to-cell contact between Jurkat cells under conditions where tetherin restricted cell-free virion release. In T cells infected with Vpu-defective HIV-1, tetherin was enriched at the VS, and VS formation was increased compared to the WT, correlating with an accumulation of virus envelope proteins on the cell surface. Increasing tetherin expression with type I interferon had only minor effects on cell-to-cell transmission. Furthermore, small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion of tetherin decreased VS formation and cell-to-cell transmission of both Vpu-defective and WT HIV-1. Taken together, these data demonstrate that tetherin does not restrict VS-mediated T cell-to-T cell transfer of Vpu-defective HIV-1 and suggest that under some circumstances tetherin might promote cell-to-cell transfer, either by mediating the accumulation of virions on the cell surface or by regulating integrity of the VS. If so, inhibition of tetherin activity by Vpu may balance requirements for efficient cell-free virion production and cell-to-cell transfer of HIV-1 in the face of antiviral immune responses.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 can disseminate between and within hosts by cell-free infection or by direct cell-cell spread. Cell-cell spread of HIV-1 between CD4⁺ T cells is an efficient means of viral dissemination (65) and has been estimated to be several orders of magnitude more rapid than cell-free virus infection (6, 8, 41, 64, 74). Cell-cell transmission of HIV-1 takes place at the virological synapse (VS), a multimolecular structure that forms at the interface between an HIV-1-infected T cell and an uninfected target T cell during intercellular contact (27). Related structures that facilitate cell-cell spread of HIV-1 between dendritic cells and T cells (42) and between macrophages and T cells (16, 17) and for cell-cell spread of the related retrovirus human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) (24) have also been described. Moreover, more long-range cell-cell transfer can occur via cellular projections, including filopodia (71) and membrane nanotubes (75). The VS is initiated by binding of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env), which is expressed on the surfaces of infected T cells, to HIV-1 entry receptors (CD4 and either CXCR4 or CCR5) present on the target cell membrane (6, 22, 27, 41, 61, 73). Interactions between LFA-1 and ICAM-1 and ICAM-3 further stabilize the conjugate interface and, together with Env receptor binding, help trigger the recruitment of viral proteins, CD4/coreceptor, and integrins to the contact site (27, 28, 61). The enrichment of viral and cellular proteins at the VS is an active process, dependent on cytoskeletal remodeling, and in the infected T cell both the actin and tubulin network regulate polarization of HIV-1 proteins at the cell-cell interface, thus directing HIV-1 assembly and egress toward the engaged target cell (27, 29). Virus is transferred by budding into the synaptic cleft, and virions subsequently attach to the target cell membrane to mediate entry, either by fusion at the plasma membrane or possibly following endocytic uptake (2, 22). In this way, the VS promotes more rapid infection kinetics and may enhance HIV-1 pathogenesis in vivo.Cells have evolved a number of barriers to resist invading microorganisms. One mechanism that appears to be particularly important in counteracting HIV-1 infection is a group of interferon-inducible, innate restriction factors that includes TRIM5α, APOBEC3G, and tetherin (38, 49, 69, 79). Tetherin (BST-2/CD317) is a host protein expressed by many cell types, including CD4⁺ T cells, that acts at a late stage of the HIV-1 life cycle to trap (or “tether”) mature virions at the plasma membranes of virus-producing cells, thereby inhibiting cell-free virus release (49, 56, 81). This antiviral activity of tetherin is not restricted to HIV-1, and tetherin can also inhibit the release of other enveloped viruses from infected cells (31, 40, 54, 62). What the cellular function of tetherin is besides its antiviral activity is unclear, but because expression is upregulated following alpha/beta interferon (IFN-α/β) treatment (1) and tetherin can restrict a range of enveloped viruses, tetherin has been postulated to be a broad-acting mediator of the innate immune defense against enveloped viruses.To circumvent restriction of particle release, HIV-1 encodes the 16-kDa accessory protein Vpu, which antagonizes tetherin and restores normal virus budding (47, 78). The molecular mechanisms by which Vpu does this are not entirely clear, but evidence suggests that Vpu may exert its antagonistic function by downregulating tetherin from the cell surface, trapping it in the trans-Golgi network (10) and targeting it for degradation by the proteasome (12, 39, 81) or lysosome (9, 25, 44); however, degradation of tetherin may be dispensable for Vpu activity (13), and in HIV-1-infected T cells, surface downregulation of tetherin has been reported to be minor (45), suggesting that global removal of tetherin from the plasma membrane may not be necessary to antagonize its function.Tetherin-mediated restriction of HIV-1 and antagonism by Vpu have been the focus of much research, and inhibition of cell-free virus infection has been well documented (33, 47-49, 77, 81, 82). In contrast, less studied is the impact of tetherin on direct cell-cell dissemination. For example, it is not clear if tetherin-mediated restriction inhibits T cell-T cell spread as efficiently as cell-free release or whether tetherin affects VS formation. To address these questions, we analyzed Vpu⁺ and Vpu⁻ viruses for their ability to spread directly between Jurkat T cells and primary CD4⁺ T cells in the presence or absence of endogenous tetherin. Our data suggest that tetherin does not restrict HIV-1 in the context of cell-to-cell transmission of virus between T cells expressing endogenous tetherin. Interestingly, we also that observed that Vpu-defective virus may disseminate more efficiently by cell-cell spread at the VS. We postulate that cell-cell spread may favor viral pathogenesis by allowing HIV-1 to disseminate in the presence of tetherin during an interferon-producing innate response.     

The Transmembrane Domain of BST-2 Determines Its Sensitivity to Down-Modulation by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vpu

Bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST-2, also known as tetherin) restricts the production of a number of enveloped viruses by blocking virus release from the cell surface. This antiviral activity is counteracted by such viral factors as Vpu of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Here, we report that Vpu antagonizes human BST-2 but not BST-2 derived from African green monkeys. The determinants of susceptibility to Vpu map to the transmembrane domain of BST-2. In accordance with this, expression of human BST-2 containing a modified transmembrane domain effectively blocks the replication of wild-type Vpu-expressing HIV-1 in CD4⁺ T cells. Furthermore, these BST-2 variants, as opposed to wild-type human BST-2, are refractory to Vpu-mediated down-regulation as a result of an attenuated interaction with Vpu. In view of the work by others pointing to a key role of the transmembrane domain of Vpu in promoting virus release, our data suggest that a direct interaction through the transmembrane domain of each of these two proteins is a prerequisite for Vpu to down-modulate BST-2.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes four accessory proteins, Vif, Vpr, Vpu, and Nef. Although they are dispensable for HIV-1 replication in certain transformed cell lines, these accessory proteins play important roles in HIV-1 pathogenesis by modulating host immunity and overcoming antagonism by cellular factors (10). For example, Vif counteracts APOBEC3G by recruiting the cullin 5-elongin B/C ubiquitin ligase complex and sending polyubiquitinated APOBEC3G to proteasomes for degradation (29). In the absence of Vif, newly synthesized APOBEC3G is incorporated into virus particles and hampers the production of infectious proviral DNA in the new round of infection (4, 10, 23). In addition to its role in down-modulating the cell surface expression of CD4 in infected T cells (11), Vpu stimulates HIV-1 production in cells such as HeLa cells (26). The mechanism behind this latter activity of Vpu was unknown until it was recently discovered that bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST-2, also known as tetherin, CD317, or HM1.24) blocks the release of HIV-1 and that this inhibitory effect is antagonized by viral Vpu (16, 25).BST-2 harbors an N-terminal transmembrane domain and a C-terminal glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor that together create an unusual topology with both termini of BST-2 inserted into the plasma membrane (8, 18). This unique topology of BST-2 may underlie the mechanism for the retention of progeny virus particles at the cell surface (16). An indirect mechanism behind this tethering effect has not been ruled out, especially in view of the difficulty of detecting BST-2 protein in purified HIV-1 particles (14). In addition to HIV-1, a number of enveloped viruses are subject to inhibition by BST-2, including simian immunodeficiency virus, feline immunodeficiency virus, equine infectious anemia virus, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, and Lassa virus, as well as Ebola and Marburg viruses (5, 6, 16, 19, 25). This suggests that BST-2 has a broad antiviral effect spectrum.The bst-2 gene has in its promoter the IRF-1/2 and ISGF3 response elements and thus belongs to the interferon-stimulated gene family (17). In line with its ability to impair the release of enveloped viruses, BST-2 has been demonstrated to be the effector in human embryonic kidney (HEK293T) cells that leads to the interferon-induced block of Vpu deletion-containing HIV-1 production (15). However, the African green monkey kidney cell line COS-7 responds to interferon treatment with a different outcome in that the production of both Vpu deletion-containing and Vpu-expressing HIV-1 is inhibited (15). This indicates that interferon induces a block to HIV-1 in COS-7 cells that cannot be overcome by Vpu. A conceivable candidate that creates this block is BST-2 in COS-7 cells (hereafter named agmBST-2). In this study, we provide evidence that depletion of endogenous BST-2 in COS-7 cells greatly alleviates interferon-induced inhibition of HIV-1 production. The refractoriness of agmBST-2 to Vpu results from a weak association of these two proteins and a resistance of agmBST-2 to Vpu-mediated down-regulation.     

Caveolin-1 Modulates HIV-1 Envelope-Induced Bystander Apoptosis through gp41

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope (Env)-mediated bystander apoptosis is known to cause the progressive, severe, and irreversible loss of CD4⁺ T cells in HIV-1-infected patients. Env-induced bystander apoptosis has been shown to be gp41 dependent and related to the membrane hemifusion between envelope-expressing cells and target cells. Caveolin-1 (Cav-1), the scaffold protein of specific membrane lipid rafts called caveolae, has been reported to interact with gp41. However, the underlying pathological or physiological meaning of this robust interaction remains unclear. In this report, we examine the interaction of cellular Cav-1 and HIV gp41 within the lipid rafts and show that Cav-1 modulates Env-induced bystander apoptosis through interactions with gp41 in SupT1 cells and CD4⁺ T lymphocytes isolated from human peripheral blood. Cav-1 significantly suppressed Env-induced membrane hemifusion and caspase-3 activation and augmented Hsp70 upregulation. Moreover, a peptide containing the Cav-1 scaffold domain sequence markedly inhibited bystander apoptosis and apoptotic signal pathways. Our studies shed new light on the potential role of Cav-1 in limiting HIV pathogenesis and the development of a novel therapeutic strategy in treating HIV-1-infected patients.HIV infection causes a progressive, severe, and irreversible depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, which is responsible for the development of AIDS (9). The mechanism through which HIV infection induces cell death involves a variety of processes (58). Among these processes, apoptosis is most likely responsible for T-cell destruction in HIV-infected patients (33), because active antiretroviral therapy has been associated with low levels of CD4⁺ T-cell apoptosis (7), and AIDS progression was shown previously to correlate with the extent of immune cell apoptosis (34). Importantly, bystander apoptosis of uninfected cells was demonstrated to be one of the major processes involved in the destruction of immune cells (58), with the majority of apoptotic CD4⁺ T cells in the peripheral blood and lymph nodes being uninfected in HIV patients (22).Binding to uninfected cells or the entry of viral proteins released by infected cells is responsible for the virus-mediated killing of innocent-bystander CD4⁺ T cells (2-4, 9, 65). The HIV envelope glycoprotein complex, consisting of gp120 and gp41 subunits expressed on an HIV-infected cell membrane (73), is believed to induce bystander CD4⁺ T-cell apoptosis (58). Although there is a soluble form of gp120 in the blood, there is no conclusive agreement as to whether the concentration is sufficient to trigger apoptosis (57, 58). The initial step in HIV infection is mediated by the Env glycoprotein gp120 binding with high affinity to CD4, the primary receptor on the target cell surface, which is followed by interactions with the chemokine receptor CCR5 or CXCR4 (61). This interaction triggers a conformational change in gp41 and the insertion of its N-terminal fusion peptide into the target membrane (30). Next, a prehairpin structure containing leucine zipper-like motifs is formed by the two conserved coiled-coil domains, called the N-terminal and C-terminal heptad repeats (28, 66, 70). This structure quickly collapses into a highly stable six-helix bundle structure with an N-terminal heptad repeat inside and a hydrophobic C-terminal heptad repeat outside (28, 66, 70). The formation of the six-helix bundle leads to a juxtaposition and fusion with the target cell membrane (28, 66, 70). The fusogenic potential of HIV Env is proven to correlate with the pathogenesis of both CXCR4- and CCR5-tropic viruses by not only delivering the viral genome to uninfected cells but also mediating Env-induced bystander apoptosis (71). Initial infection is dominated by the CCR5-tropic strains, with the CXCR4-tropic viruses emerging in the later stages of disease (20). Studies have shown that CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 triggers more depletion of CD4⁺ T cells than CCR5-tropic strains (36).Glycolipid- and cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomains, termed lipid rafts, are spatially organized plasma membranes and are known to have many diverse functions (26, 53). These functions include membrane trafficking, endocytosis, the regulation of cholesterol and calcium homeostasis, and signal transduction in cellular growth and apoptosis. Lipid rafts have also been implicated in HIV cell entry and budding processes (19, 46, 48, 51). One such organelle is the caveola, which is a small, flask-shaped (50 to 100 nm in diameter) invagination in the plasma membrane (5, 62). The caveola structure, which is composed of proteins known as caveolins, plays a role in various functions by serving as a mobile platform for many receptors and signal proteins (5, 62). Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) is a 22- to 24-kDa major coat protein responsible for caveola assembly (25, 47). This scaffolding protein forms a hairpin-like structure and exists as an oligomeric complex of 14 to 16 monomers (21). Cav-1 has been shown to be expressed by a variety of cell types, mostly endothelial cells, type I pneumocytes, fibroblasts, and adipocytes (5, 62). In addition, Cav-1 expression is evident in immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells (38, 39). However, Cav-1 is not expressed in isolated thymocytes (49). Furthermore, Cav-1 and caveolar structures are absent in human or murine T-cell lines (27, 41, 68). Contrary to this, there has been one report showing evidence of Cav-1 expression in bovine primary cell subpopulations of CD4⁺, CD8⁺, CD21⁺, and IgM⁺ cells with Cav-1 localized predominantly in the perinuclear region (38). That report also demonstrated a membrane region staining with Cav-1-specific antibody of human CD21⁺ and CD26⁺ peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs). Recently, the expression of Cav-1 in activated murine B cells, with a potential role in the development of a thymus-independent immune response, was also reported (56). It remains to be determined whether Cav-1 expression is dependent on the activation state of lymphocytes. For macrophages, however, which are one of the main cell targets for HIV infection, Cav-1 expression has been clearly documented (38).The scaffolding domain of Cav-1, located in the juxtamembranous region of the N terminus, is responsible for its oligomerization and binding to various proteins (5, 62, 64). It recognizes a consensus binding motif, ΦXΦXXXXΦ, ΦXXXXΦXXΦ, or ΦXΦXXXXΦXXΦ, where Φ indicates an aromatic residue (F, W, or Y) and X indicates any residue (5, 62, 64). A Cav-1 binding motif (WNNMTWMQW) has been identified in the HIV-1 envelope protein gp41 (42, 43). Cav-1 has been shown to associate with gp41 by many different groups under various circumstances, including the immunoprecipitation of gp41 and Cav-1 in HIV-infected cells (42, 43, 52). However, the underlying pathological or physiological functions of this robust interaction between Cav-1 and gp41 remain unclear.Here, we report that the interaction between Cav-1 and gp41 leads to a modification of gp41 function, which subsequently regulates Env-induced T-cell bystander apoptosis. Moreover, we show that a peptide containing the Cav-1 scaffold domain sequence is capable of modulating Env-induced bystander apoptosis, which suggests a novel therapeutic application for HIV-1-infected patients.     

Interactions of DNA with Biofilm-Derived Membrane Vesicles

The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms. Biofilm-derived membrane vesicles (MVs) and DNA, both matrix components, demonstrated concentration-, pH-, and cation-dependent interactions. Furthermore, MV-DNA association influenced MV surface properties. This bears consequences for the reactivity and availability for interaction of matrix polymers and other constituents.The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms and is crucial for the development of fundamental biofilm properties (46, 47). Early studies defined polysaccharides as the matrix component, but proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids are all now acknowledged as important contributors (7, 15). Indeed, DNA has emerged as a vital participant, fulfilling structural and functional roles (1, 5, 6, 19, 31, 34, 36, 41, 43, 44). The phosphodiester bond of DNA renders this polyanionic at a physiological pH, undoubtedly contributing to interactions with cations, humic substances, fine-dispersed minerals, and matrix entities (25, 41, 49).In addition to particulates such as flagella and pili, membrane vesicles (MVs) are also found within the matrices of gram-negative and mixed biofilms (3, 16, 40). MVs are multifunctional bilayered structures that bleb from the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria (reviewed in references 4, 24, 27, 28, and 30) and are chemically heterogeneous, combining the known chemistries of the biofilm matrix. Examination of biofilm samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has suggested that matrix material interacts with MVs (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Since MVs produced in planktonic culture have associated DNA (11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 30, 39, 48), could biofilm-derived MVs incorporate DNA (1, 39, 40, 44)?Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Possible interactions between matrix polymers and particulate structures. Shown is an electron micrograph of a thin section through a P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm. During processing, some dehydration occurred, resulting in collapse of matrix material into fibrillate arrangements (black filled arrows). There is a suggestion of interactions occurring with particulate structures such as MVs (hollow white arrow) and flagella (filled white arrows) (identified by the appearance and cross-dimension of these highly ordered structures when viewed at high magnification), which was consistently observed with other embedded samples and also with whole-mount preparations of gently disrupted biofilms (data not shown). The scale bar represents 200 nm.     

HIV-1 gp120 Determinants Proximal to the CD4 Binding Site Shift Protective Glycans That Are Targeted by Monoclonal Antibody 2G12

HIV-1 R5 envelopes vary considerably in their capacities to exploit low CD4 levels on macrophages for infection and in their sensitivities to the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) monoclonal antibody (MAb) b12 and the glycan-specific MAb 2G12. Here, we show that nonglycan determinants flanking the CD4 binding loop, which affect exposure of the CD4bs, also modulate 2G12 neutralization. Our data indicate that such residues act via a mechanism that involves shifts in the orientation of proximal glycans, thus modulating the sensitivity of 2G12 neutralization and affecting the overall presentation and structure of the glycan shield.The trimeric envelope (Env) spikes on HIV-1 virions are comprised of gp120 and gp41 heterodimers. gp120 is coated extensively with glycans (9, 11, 15) that are believed to protect the envelope from neutralizing antibodies. The extents and locations of glycosylation are variable and evolving (15). Thus, while some glycans are conserved, others appear or disappear in a host over the course of infection. Such changes may result in exposure or protection of functional envelope sites and can result from selection by different environmental pressures in vivo, including neutralizing antibodies.We previously reported that HIV-1 R5 envelopes varied considerably in tropism and neutralization sensitivity (3, 4, 12-14). We showed that highly macrophage-tropic R5 envelopes were more frequently detected in brain than in semen, blood, and lymph node (LN) samples (12, 14). The capacity of R5 envelopes to infect macrophages correlated with their ability to exploit low levels of cell surface CD4 for infection (12, 14). Determinants within and proximal to the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) were shown to modulate macrophage infectivity (3, 4, 5, 12, 13) and presumably acted by altering the avidity of the trimer for cell surface CD4. These determinants include residues proximal to the CD4 binding loop, which is likely the first part of the CD4bs contacted by CD4 (1). We also observed that macrophage-tropic R5 envelopes were frequently more resistant to the glycan-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb) 2G12 than were non-macrophage-tropic R5 Envs (13).Here, we investigated the envelope determinants of 2G12 sensitivity by using two HIV-1 envelopes that we used previously to map macrophage tropism determinants (4), B33 from brain and LN40 from lymph node tissue of an AIDS patient with neurological complications. While B33 imparts high levels of macrophage infectivity and is resistant to 2G12, LN40 Env confers very inefficient macrophage infection and is 2G12 sensitive (12-14).     

Role of Complex Carbohydrates in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection and Resistance to Antibody Neutralization

Complex N-glycans flank the receptor binding sites of the outer domain of HIV-1 gp120, ostensibly forming a protective “fence” against antibodies. Here, we investigated the effects of rebuilding this fence with smaller glycoforms by expressing HIV-1 pseudovirions from a primary isolate in a human cell line lacking N-acetylglucosamine transferase I (GnTI), the enzyme that initiates the conversion of oligomannose N-glycans into complex N-glycans. Thus, complex glycans, including those that surround the receptor binding sites, are replaced by fully trimmed oligomannose stumps. Conversely, the untrimmed oligomannoses of the silent domain of gp120 are likely to remain unchanged. For comparison, we produced a mutant virus lacking a complex N-glycan of the V3 loop (N301Q). Both variants exhibited increased sensitivities to V3 loop-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and soluble CD4. The N301Q virus was also sensitive to “nonneutralizing” MAbs targeting the primary and secondary receptor binding sites. Endoglycosidase H treatment resulted in the removal of outer domain glycans from the GnTI- but not the parent Env trimers, and this was associated with a rapid and complete loss in infectivity. Nevertheless, the glycan-depleted trimers could still bind to soluble receptor and coreceptor analogs, suggesting a block in post-receptor binding conformational changes necessary for fusion. Collectively, our data show that the antennae of complex N-glycans serve to protect the V3 loop and CD4 binding site, while N-glycan stems regulate native trimer conformation, such that their removal can lead to global changes in neutralization sensitivity and, in extreme cases, an inability to complete the conformational rearrangements necessary for infection.The intriguing results of a recent clinical trial suggest that an effective HIV-1 vaccine may be possible (97). Optimal efficacy may require a component that induces broadly neutralizing antibodies (BNAbs) that can block virus infection by their exclusive ability to recognize the trimeric envelope glycoprotein (Env) spikes on particle surfaces (43, 50, 87, 90). Env is therefore at the center of vaccine design programs aiming to elicit effective humoral immune responses.The amino acid sequence variability of Env presents a significant challenge for researchers seeking to elicit broadly effective NAbs. Early sequence comparisons revealed, however, that the surface gp120 subunit can be divided into discrete variable and conserved domains (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (110), the latter providing some hope for broadly effective NAb-based vaccines. Indeed, the constraints on variability in the conserved domains of gp120 responsible for binding the host cell receptor CD4, and coreceptor, generally CCR5, provide potential sites of vulnerability. However, viral defense strategies, such as the conformational masking of conserved epitopes (57), have made the task of eliciting bNAbs extremely difficult.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Glycan biosynthesis and distribution on gp120 and gp41. (A) Putative carbohydrate modifications are shown on gp120 and gp41 secondary structures, based on various published works (26, 42, 63, 74, 119, 128). The gp120 outer domain is indicated, as are residues that form the SOS gp120-gp41 disulfide bridge. The outer domain is divided into neutralizing and silent faces. Symbols distinguish complex, oligomannose, and unknown glycans. Generally, the complex glycans of the outer domain line the receptor binding sites of the neutralizing face, while the oligomannose glycans of the outer domain protect the silent domain (105). Asterisks denote sequons that are unlikely to be utilized, including position 139 (42), position 189 (26, 42), position 406 (42, 74), and position 637 (42). Glycans shown in gray indicate when sequon clustering may lead to some remaining unused, e.g., positions 156 and 160 (42, 119), positions 386, 392, and 397 (42), and positions 611 and 616 (42). There is also uncertainty regarding some glycan identities: glycans at positions 188, 355, 397, and 448 are not classified as predominantly complex or oligomannose (26, 42, 63, 128). The number of mannose moieties on oligomannose glycans can vary, as can the number of antennae and sialic acids on complex glycans (77). The glycan at position 301 appears to be predominantly a tetra-antennary complex glycan, as is the glycan at position 88, while most other complex glycans are biantennary (26, 128). (B) Schematic of essential steps of glycan biosynthesis from the Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursor to a mature multiantennary complex glycan. Mannosidase I progressively removes mannose moieties from the precursor, in a process that can be inhibited by the drug kifunensine. GnTI then transfers a GlcNAc moiety to the D1 arm of the resulting Man₅GlcNAc₂ intermediate, creating a hybrid glycan. Mannose trimming of the D2 and D3 arms then allows additional GlcNAc moieties to be added by a series of GnT family enzymes to form multiantennary complexes. This process can be inhibited by swainsonine. The antennae are ultimately capped and decorated by galactose and sialic acid. Hybrid and complex glycans are usually fucosylated at the basal GlcNAc, rendering them resistant to endo H digestion. However, NgF is able to remove all types of glycan.Carbohydrates provide a layer of protection against NAb attack (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). As glycans are considered self, antibody responses against them are thought to be regulated by tolerance mechanisms. Thus, a glycan network forms a nonimmunogenic “cloak,” protecting the underlying protein from antibodies (3, 13, 20, 29, 39, 54, 65, 67, 74, 85, 96, 98, 117, 119, 120). The extent of this protection can be illustrated by considering the ways in which glycans differ from typical amino acid side chains. First, N-linked glycans are much larger, with an average mass more than 20 times that of a typical amino acid R-group. They are also usually more flexible and may therefore affect a greater volume of surrounding space. In the more densely populated parts of gp120, the carbohydrate field may even be stabilized by sugar-sugar hydrogen bonds, providing even greater coverage (18, 75, 125).The process of N-linked glycosylation can result in diverse structures that may be divided into three categories: oligomannose, hybrid, and complex (56). Each category shares a common Man₃GlcNAc₂ pentasaccharide stem (where Man is mannose and GlcNAc is N-acetylglucosamine), to which up to six mannose residues are attached in oligomannose N-glycans, while complex N-glycans are usually larger and may bear various sizes and numbers of antennae (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). Glycan synthesis begins in the endoplasmic reticulum, where N-linked oligomannose precursors (Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂; Glc is glucose) are transferred cotranslationally to the free amide of the asparagine in a sequon Asn-X-Thr/Ser, where X is not Pro (40). Terminal glucose and mannose moieties are then trimmed to yield Man₅GlcNAc₂ (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). Conversion to a hybrid glycan is then initiated by N-acetylglucosamine transferase I (GnTI), which transfers a GlcNAc moiety to the D1 arm of the Man₅GlcNAc₂ substrate (19) (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). This hybrid glycoform is then a substrate for modification into complex glycans, in which the D2 and D3 arm mannose residues are replaced by complex antennae (19, 40, 56). Further enzymatic action catalyzes the addition of α-1-6-linked fucose moiety to the lower GlcNAc of complex glycan stems, but usually not to oligomannose glycan stems (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (21, 113).Most glycoproteins exhibit only fully mature complex glycans. However, the steric limitations imposed by the high density of glycans on some parts of gp120 lead to incomplete trimming, leaving “immature” oligomannose glycans (22, 26, 128). Spatial competition between neighboring sequons can sometimes lead to one or the other remaining unutilized, further distancing the final Env product from what might be expected based on its primary sequence (42, 48, 74, 119). An attempt to assign JR-FL gp120 and gp41 sequon use and types, based on various studies, is shown in Fig. ​Fig.1A1A (6, 26, 34, 35, 42, 63, 71, 74, 119, 128). At some positions, the glycan type is conserved. For example, the glycan at residue N301 has consistently been found to be complex (26, 63, 128). At other positions, considerable heterogeneity exists in the glycan populations, in some cases to the point where it is difficult to unequivocally assign them as predominantly complex or oligomannose. The reasons for these uncertainties might include incomplete trimming (42), interstrain sequence variability, the form of Env (e.g., gp120 or gp140), and the producer cell. The glycans of native Env trimers and monomeric gp120 may differ due to the constraints imposed by oligomerization (32, 41, 77). Thus, although all the potential sequons of HXB2 gp120 were found to be occupied in one study (63), some are unutilized or variably utilized on functional trimers, presumably due to steric limitations (42, 48, 75, 96, 119).The distribution of complex and oligomannose glycans on gp120 largely conforms with an antigenic map derived from structural models (59, 60, 102, 120), in which the outer domain is divided into a neutralizing face and an immunologically silent face. Oligomannose glycans cluster tightly on the silent face of gp120 (18, 128), while complex glycans flank the gp120 receptor binding sites of the neutralizing face, ostensibly forming a protective “fence” against NAbs (105). The relatively sparse clustering of complex glycans that form this fence may reflect a trade-off between protecting the underlying functional domains from NAbs by virtue of large antennae while at the same time permitting sufficient flexibility for the refolding events associated with receptor binding and fusion (29, 39, 67, 75, 98, 117). Conversely, the dense clustering of oligomannose glycans on the silent domain may be important for ensuring immune protection and/or in creating binding sites for lectins such as DC-SIGN (9, 44).The few available broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) define sites of vulnerability on Env trimers (reviewed in reference 52). They appear to fall into two general categories: those that access conserved sites by overcoming Env''s various evasion strategies and, intriguingly, those that exploit these very defensive mechanisms. Regarding the first category, MAb b12 recognizes an epitope that overlaps the CD4 binding site of gp120 (14), and MAbs 2F5 and 4E10 (84, 129) recognize adjacent epitopes of the membrane-proximal external region (MPER) at the C-terminal ectodomain of gp41. The variable neutralizing potencies of these MAbs against primary isolates that contain their core epitopes illustrate how conformational masking can dramatically regulate their exposure (11, 118). Conformational masking also limits the activities of MAbs directed to the V3 loop and MAbs whose epitopes overlap the coreceptor binding site (11, 62, 121).A second category of MAbs includes MAb 2G12, which recognizes a tight cluster of glycans in the silent domain of gp120 (16, 101, 103, 112). This epitope has recently sparked considerable interest in exploiting glycan clusters as possible carbohydrate-based vaccines (2, 15, 31, 70, 102, 116). Two recently described MAbs, PG9 and PG16 (L. M. Walker and D. R. Burton, unpublished data), also target epitopes regulated by the presence of glycans that involve conserved elements of the second and third variable loops and depend largely on the quaternary trimer structure and its in situ presentation on membranes. Their impressive breadth and potency may come from the fact that they target the very mechanisms (variable loops and glycans) that are generally thought to protect the virus from neutralization. Like 2G12, these epitopes are likely to be constitutively exposed and thus may not be subject to conformational masking (11, 118).The above findings reveal the importance of N-glycans both as a means of protection against neutralization as well as in directly contributing to unique neutralizing epitopes. Clearly, further studies on the nature and function of glycans in native Env trimers are warranted. Possible approaches may be divided into four categories, namely, (i) targeted mutation, (ii) enzymatic removal, (iii) expression in the presence of glycosylation inhibitors, and (iv) expression in mutant cell lines with engineered blocks in the glycosylation pathway. Much of the available information on the functional roles of glycans in HIV-1 and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection has come from the study of mutants that eliminate glycans either singly or in combination (20, 54, 66, 71, 74, 91, 95, 96). Most mutants of this type remain at least partially functional (74, 95, 96). In some cases these mutants have little effect on neutralization sensitivity, while in others they can lead to increased sensitivity to MAbs specific for the V3 loop and CD4 binding site (CD4bs) (54, 71, 72, 74, 106). In exceptional cases, increased sensitivity to MAbs targeting the coreceptor binding site and/or the gp41 MPER has been observed (54, 66, 72, 74).Of the remaining approaches for studying the roles of glycans, enzymatic removal is constrained by the extreme resistance of native Env trimers to many common glycosidases, contrasting with the relative sensitivity of soluble gp120 (67, 76, 101). Alternatively, drugs can be used to inhibit various stages of mammalian glycan biosynthesis. Notable examples are imino sugars, such as N-butyldeoxynojirimycin (NB-DNJ), that inhibit the early trimming of the glucose moieties from Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursors in the endoplasmic reticulum (28, 38, 51). Viruses produced in the presence of these drugs may fail to undergo proper gp160 processing or fusion (37, 51). Other classes of inhibitor include kifunensine and swainsonine, which, respectively, inhibit the trimming of the Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursor into Man₅GlcNAc₂ or inhibit the removal of remaining D2 and D3 arm mannoses from the hybrid glycans, thus preventing the construction of complex glycan antennae (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (17, 33, 76, 104, 119). Unlike NB-DNJ, viruses produced in the presence of these drugs remain infectious (36, 76, 79, 100).Yet another approach is to express virus in insect cells that can only modify proteins with paucimannose N-glycans (58). However, the inefficient gp120/gp41 processing by furin-like proteases in these cells prevents their utility in functional studies (123). Another option is provided by ricin-selected GnTI-deficient cell lines that cannot transfer GlcNAc onto the mannosidase-trimmed Man₅GlcNAc₂ substrate, preventing the formation of hybrid and complex carbohydrates (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (17, 32, 36, 94). This arrests glycan processing at a well-defined point, leading to the substitution of complex glycans with Man₅GlcNAc₂ rather than with the larger Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursors typically obtained with kifunensine treatment (17, 32, 33, 104). With this in mind, here we produced HIV-1 pseudoviruses in GnTI-deficient cells to investigate the role of complex glycan antennae in viral resistance neutralization. By replacing complex glycans with smaller Man₅GlcNAc₂ we can determine the effect of “lowering the glycan fence” that surrounds the receptor binding sites, compared to the above-mentioned studies of individual glycan deletion mutants, whose effects are analogous to removing a fence post. Furthermore, since oligomannose glycans are sensitive to certain enzymes, such as endoglycosidase H (endo H), we investigated the effect of dismantling the glycan fence on Env function and stability. Our results suggest that the antennae of complex glycans protect against certain specificities but that glycan stems regulate trimer conformation with often more dramatic consequences for neutralization sensitivity and in extreme cases, infectious function.     

Influence of Novel CD4 Binding-Defective HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein Immunogens on Neutralizing Antibody and T-Cell Responses in Nonhuman Primates

The high-affinity in vivo interaction between soluble HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) immunogens and primate CD4 results in conformational changes that alter the immunogenicity of the gp120 subunit. Because the conserved binding site on gp120 that directly interacts with CD4 is a major vaccine target, we sought to better understand the impact of in vivo Env-CD4 interactions during vaccination. Rhesus macaques were immunized with soluble wild-type (WT) Env trimers, and two trimer immunogens rendered CD4 binding defective through distinct mechanisms. In one variant, we introduced a mutation that directly disrupts CD4 binding (368D/R). In the second variant, we introduced three mutations (423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E) that disrupt CD4 binding indirectly by altering a gp120 subdomain known as the bridging sheet, which is required for locking Env into a stable interaction with CD4. Following immunization, Env-specific binding antibody titers and frequencies of Env-specific memory B cells were comparable between the groups. However, the quality of neutralizing antibody responses induced by the variants was distinctly different. Antibodies against the coreceptor binding site were elicited by WT trimers but not the CD4 binding-defective trimers, while antibodies against the CD4 binding site were elicited by the WT and the 423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E trimers but not the 368D/R trimers. Furthermore, the CD4 binding-defective trimer variants stimulated less potent neutralizing antibody activity against neutralization-sensitive viruses than WT trimers. Overall, our studies do not reveal any potential negative effects imparted by the in vivo interaction between WT Env and primate CD4 on the generation of functional T cells and antibodies in response to soluble Env vaccination.The HIV-1 Envs mediate the entry of the virus into target cells and are the only virally encoded proteins exposed on the surface of the virus. HIV-1 Env is the sole target for neutralizing antibodies (Abs) and therefore is an important component of a vaccine designed to elicit protective antibody responses (4, 20). The viral spike is a trimer comprised of three heterodimers of the exterior envelope glycoprotein, gp120, noncovalently attached to the transmembrane protein, gp41. The gp120 subunit binds the primary receptor, CD4 (7), to form or to expose the gp120 coreceptor binding elements, which interact with the viral coreceptor, primarily CCR5 (1, 9, 12, 45). The highly conserved coreceptor binding site (CoRbs) overlaps the gp120 bridging sheet and also contains both proximal and distal elements of V3 (18, 32, 43, 45).In attempts to mimic the native trimeric structure of Env present on the virus, various forms of soluble Env trimers were designed (reviewed in reference 14). One design consists of cleavage-defective trimers derived from the primary R5 isolate YU2 that possess a heterologous trimerization motif derived from T4 bacteriophage fibritin (F; YU2 gp140-F) (3, 21, 34, 40, 50, 51). We recently demonstrated that the immunization of monkeys, but not rabbits, with gp140-F trimers resulted in the generation of Abs directed against the CoRbs of gp120 capable of cross-neutralizing HIV-2 (15). CoRbs-directed Abs (also referred to as CD4-induced, or CD4i, Abs) also were elicited in rabbits transgenic for human CD4 (15). Taken together, these data strongly suggest that Env interacts with high-affinity primate CD4 in vivo, resulting in the formation, or exposure, of a highly immunogenic gp120 determinant that overlaps the CoRbs. Early in infection, the frequency of HIV-1-infected individuals with significant antibody responses against the CoRbs is high (8, 33), and CoRbs-directed antibody responses are elicited abundantly in humans inoculated with Env-based immunogens (15). Collectively, these data suggest that the recognition of the HIV-1 CoRbs by naïve B cells is greatly increased when Env is presented in complex with high-affinity primate CD4, leading to a productive Ab response against this epitope (41). With rare exceptions, the majority of CoRbs-directed monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) do not neutralize HIV-1 primary viruses in vitro, bringing into question the utility of this region as a relevant neutralization target (23, 31, 47, 49). Strategies aimed to diminish vaccine-elicited B-cell responses to the CoRbs, and shift responses toward more accessible neutralization targets, represent one approach to improve the design of Env-based vaccine candidates. The selective manipulation of Env immunogens to decrease their CD4 binding capacity may reduce the elicitation of CoRbs-directed Abs and circumvent potential occlusion effects of the conserved CD4 binding site caused by CD4 itself.In addition to the potential effects of in vivo Env-CD4 interactions on the Ab repertoire elicited by Env-based immunogens, interactions between Env and CD4 also may have consequences on CD4⁺ T-cell responses. CD4 is an important costimulatory molecule expressed on several subsets of T cells and antigen-presenting cells, and interactions with Env were shown to alter the function of CD4-expressing T cells in a number of in vitro systems (13, 37, 44). The elimination of the Env-CD4 interaction in the context of vaccination may be beneficial to improve the elicitation of helper T-cell responses and effective neutralizing Ab responses. In vivo evaluation in subjects possessing high-affinity CD4 (i.e., rhesus macaques or humans) of CD4 binding-competent and CD4 binding-deficient Env immunogens so far have not been described.To address these questions, we designed Env trimer variants rendered CD4 binding defective through two distinct mechanisms. In the first variant, the interaction between CD4 and HIV-1 Env was directly disrupted by the introduction of a mutation (368D/R) in the CD4 binding loop of the gp120 outer domain (29). This alteration abolishes the initial binding of CD4 and most CD4 binding site (CD4bs)-directed MAbs (42) to variant forms of gp120 and would be expected to do the same in the soluble stable timer context. The aim of the second variant was to decrease the CD4 binding affinity while preserving the antigenicity of the CD4bs (48). This variant was generated in the soluble gp140-F trimers by the introduction of three point mutations, 423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E, in the β20 strand region of gp120. These mutations were suggested to favor a helix rather than the β20/21 antiparallel strands visible in the gp120 structure (23, 31, 47, 49). In the monomeric context, mutations in the β20 strand region of gp120 abolish binding by CoRbs-directed Abs, presumably because the bridging sheet cannot form (48). The introduction of the 423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E mutations in the trimer context therefore should disrupt the normally high-affinity gp120-CD4 interaction, while recognition by CD4bs Abs would not be affected. Indeed, a recent study provides a mechanistic basis for the impact of these mutations on CD4 binding (52). This study revealed that CD4 interacts with gp120 by a two-step binding mechanism in which the first step involves a direct, but low-affinity, CD4 interaction with the gp120 outer domain, while the second step requires a conformational change in gp120 to fully stabilize the high-affinity gp120-CD4 interaction.Here, we exploit this two-step model to generate novel CD4 binding-defective soluble trimers that, unlike the 368D/R trimers, possess a CD4bs surface that retains recognition by well-described CD4bs Abs. By immunizing rhesus macaques with the wild-type (WT) and CD4 binding-defective trimer variants, we demonstrate that similar levels of Env-specific Ab and T-cell responses were elicited in the three groups, suggesting that in vivo interactions between CD4 binding-competent (WT) Env and CD4 do not measurably affect T-cell responses against Env in this immunization regimen. However, the quality of the Ab response was markedly different between the groups. As hypothesized, CoRbs-directed Abs were elicited only in animals inoculated with WT trimers and not in those inoculated with 368D/R or 423I/M, 425N/K, and 431G/E trimers (hereafter referred to as 368 and 423/425/431 trimers, respectively). Importantly, we show that the 423/425/431 trimers retain the capacity to elicit binding and neutralizing CD4bs-directed Abs. In conclusion, the results generated in this study suggest that CD4 engagement by the WT soluble Env trimers did not impair the overall magnitude of the elicited Env-specific antibody or T-cell responses. Furthermore, our data provide new insights into the characteristics of Env that impact immunogenicity. The data also provide a potential path forward for the design of Env immunogens that have the capacity to elicit neutralizing Abs against the conserved gp120 CD4 binding surface while eliminating both the elicitation of nonneutralizing CoRbs-directed Abs and the potential occlusion of the CD4 binding surface of gp120 by the engagement of the primary virus receptor, CD4.     

The ESCRT-Associated Protein Alix Recruits the Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4-1 To Facilitate HIV-1 Release through the LYPXnL L Domain Motif

The p6 region of HIV-1 Gag contains two late (L) domains, PTAP and LYPX_nL, that bind Tsg101 and Alix, respectively. Interactions with these two cellular proteins recruit members of the host''s fission machinery (ESCRT) to facilitate HIV-1 release. Other retroviruses gain access to the host ESCRT components by utilizing a PPXY-type L domain that interacts with cellular Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases. Despite the absence of a PPXY motif in HIV-1 Gag, interaction with the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-2 was recently shown to stimulate HIV-1 release. We show here that another Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase, Nedd4-1, corrected release defects resulting from the disruption of PTAP (PTAP⁻), suggesting that HIV-1 Gag also recruits Nedd4-1 to facilitate virus release. Notably, Nedd4-1 remediation of HIV-1 PTAP⁻ budding defects is independent of cellular Tsg101, implying that Nedd4-1''s function in HIV-1 release does not involve ESCRT-I components and is therefore distinct from that of Nedd4-2. Consistent with this finding, deletion of the p6 region decreased Nedd4-1-Gag interaction, and disruption of the LYPX_nL motif eliminated Nedd4-1-mediated restoration of HIV-1 PTAP⁻. This result indicated that both Nedd4-1 interaction with Gag and function in virus release occur through the Alix-binding LYPX_nL motif. Mutations of basic residues located in the NC domain of Gag that are critical for Alix''s facilitation of HIV-1 release, also disrupted release mediated by Nedd4-1, further confirming a Nedd4-1-Alix functional interdependence. In fact we found that Nedd4-1 binds Alix in both immunoprecipitation and yeast-two-hybrid assays. In addition, Nedd4-1 requires its catalytic activity to promote virus release. Remarkably, RNAi knockdown of cellular Nedd4-1 eliminated Alix ubiquitination in the cell and impeded its ability to function in HIV-1 release. Together our data support a model in which Alix recruits Nedd4-1 to facilitate HIV-1 release mediated through the LYPX_nL/Alix budding pathway via a mechanism that involves Alix ubiquitination.Retroviral Gag polyproteins bear short conserved sequences that control virus budding and release. As such, these motifs have been dubbed late or L domains (49). Three types of L domains have thus far been characterized: PT/SAP, LYPX_nL, and PPPY motifs (5, 9, 32). They recruit host proteins known to function in the vacuolar protein sorting (vps) of cargo proteins and the generation of multivesicular bodies (MVB) compartments (2). It is currently accepted that budding of vesicles into MVB involves the sequential recruitment of endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT-I, -II, and -III) and the activity of the VPS4 AAA-ATPase (22). These sorting events are believed to be triggered by recognition of ubiquitin molecules conjugated to cargo proteins (20, 24, 41). For retrovirus budding, L domain motifs are the primary signals in Gag that elicit the recruitment of ESCRT components to facilitate viral budding. Consequently, mutations in L domain motifs or dominant-negative interference with the function of ESCRT-III members or the VPS4 ATPase adversely affect virus release. This indicates that Gag interactions with the ESCRT machinery are necessary for virus budding and separation from the cell (7, 10, 15, 16, 21, 28, 44).Two late domains have been identified within the p6 region of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag protein: the PTAP and LYPX_nL motifs. The PTAP motif binds the cellular protein Tsg101 (15, 39, 40, 47), whereas the LYPX_nL motif is the docking site for Alix (44). Tsg101 functions in HIV-1 budding (15) as a member of ESCRT-I (30, 48), a soluble complex required for the generation of MVB. This process is topologically similar to HIV-1 budding and requires the recruitment of ESCRT-III members called the charged-multivesicular body proteins (3, 29, 48) and the activity of the VPS4 AAA-ATPase (4, 48). In addition to binding the LYPX_nL motif, Alix also interacts with the nucleocapsid (NC) domain of HIV-1 Gag (13, 38), thus linking Gag to components of ESCRT-III that are critical for virus release (13).Other retroviruses, including the human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) and the Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMLV), utilize the PPPY-type L domain to efficiently release virus (7, 26, 51). The PPPY motif binds members of the Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase family (6, 7, 16, 19, 25, 43), whose normal cellular function is to ubiquitinate cargo proteins and target them into the MVB sorting pathway (11, 12, 20). Members of the Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase family include Nedd4-1, Nedd4-2 (also known as Nedd4L), WWP-1/2, and Itch. They contain three distinct domains: an N-terminal membrane binding C2 domain (12), a central PPPY-interacting WW domain (43), and a C-terminal HECT domain that contains the ubiquitin ligase active site (42). The functional requirement for the binding of Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases to the PPPY motif in virus budding has been demonstrated (7, 16, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 50, 51). Overexpression of dominant-negative mutants of Nedd4-like ligases, ESCRT-III components, or VPS4 cause a potent inhibition of PPPY-dependent virus release (7, 19, 29, 31, 52) and induce assembly and budding defects similar to those observed after perturbation of the PPPY motif (26, 51). These observations demonstrated that Nedd4-like ligases connect Gag encoding PPPY motif to ESCRT-III and VPS4 proteins to facilitate virus release.Whereas the role of Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases in virus budding has been established, the protein interactions that link them to the cell''s ESCRT-III pathway are still unknown. Evidence for associations of Nedd4-like ligases with ESCRT proteins have been previously reported and include: the binding of Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases LD1 and Nedd4-1 to ESCRT-I member Tsg101 (6, 31), the colocalization of multiple Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases with endosomal compartments (1, 28), the requirement of the cell''s ESCRT pathway for Itch mediated L domain independent stimulation of MoMLV release (23), and the ubiquitination of ESCRT-I components with a shorter isoform, Nedd4-2s (8). Therefore, Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligase interactions with members of the cell''s ESCRT pathway may provide retroviral Gag with access to the host budding machinery required for virus release.Although HIV-1 Gag does not carry the PPPY canonical sequence known to interact with Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases, both Nedd4-1 and Nedd4-2 were shown to restore the release of the HIV-1 PTAP⁻ mutant, albeit Nedd4-1 with less efficiency than Nedd4-2 (8, 46). These findings suggested that HIV-1 might utilize cellular Nedd4-like ubiquitin ligases to increase virus release. We present here evidence demonstrating that Nedd4-1 interacts with Gag and enhances HIV-1 PTAP⁻ virus release. Furthermore, we show that Nedd4-1''s function in HIV-1 release is distinct from that of Nedd4-2 in both its viral and cellular requirements. Notably, we found that Nedd4-1 enhancement of HIV-1 release requires the Alix-binding LYPX_nL L domain motif in the p6 region and basic residues in the NC domain. In addition, Alix''s facilitation of HIV-1 release requires cellular Nedd4-1, since mutations in NC that prevented Alix-mediated HIV-1 release also eliminated release by overexpression of Nedd4-1. This suggested a Nedd4-1-Alix physical and functional interdependence. In agreement with this, we found Nedd4-1 to bind and ubiquitinate Alix in the cell. Taken together, these results support a model in which Alix recruits Nedd4-1 to facilitate late steps of HIV-1 release through the LYPX_nL L domain motif via a mechanism that involves Alix ubiquitination.     

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nef Protein Targets CD4 to the Multivesicular Body Pathway

The Nef protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 downregulates the CD4 coreceptor from the surface of host cells by accelerating the rate of CD4 endocytosis through a clathrin/AP-2 pathway. Herein, we report that Nef has the additional function of targeting CD4 to the multivesicular body (MVB) pathway for eventual delivery to lysosomes. This targeting involves the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery. Perturbation of this machinery does not prevent removal of CD4 from the cell surface but precludes its lysosomal degradation, indicating that accelerated endocytosis and targeting to the MVB pathway are separate functions of Nef. We also show that both CD4 and Nef are ubiquitinated on lysine residues, but this modification is dispensable for Nef-induced targeting of CD4 to the MVB pathway.Primate immunodeficiency viruses infect helper T lymphocytes and cells of the macrophage/monocyte lineage by binding of their viral envelope glycoprotein, Env, to a combination of two host cell-specific surface proteins, CD4 and either the CCR5 or CXCR4 chemokine receptors (reviewed in reference 62). Ensuing fusion of the viral envelope with the host cell plasma membrane delivers the viral genetic material into the cytoplasm. Remarkably, the most highly transcribed viral gene in the early phase of infection does not encode an enzyme or structural protein but an accessory protein named Nef. Early expression of Nef is thought to reprogram the host cell for optimal replication of the virus. Indeed, Nef has been shown to enhance virus production (19, 24, 59, 74) and to promote progression to AIDS (23, 47, 48), making it an attractive candidate for pharmacologic intervention.Nef is an N-terminally myristoylated protein with a molecular mass of 27 kDa for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and 35 kDa for HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus (27, 29, 50, 65). Nef has been ascribed many functions, the best characterized of which is the downregulation of the CD4 coreceptor from the surface of infected cells (28, 35, 57). CD4 downregulation is believed to prevent superinfection (8, 52) and to preclude the cellular retention of newly synthesized Env (8, 49), thus allowing the establishment of a robust infection (30, 71).The molecular mechanism by which Nef downregulates CD4 has been extensively studied. A consensus has emerged that Nef accelerates the endocytosis of cell surface CD4 (2, 64) by linking the cytosolic tail of CD4 to the heterotetrameric (α-β2-μ2-σ2) adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) complex (17, 25, 34, 45, 67). Determinants in the CD4 tail bind to a hydrophobic pocket comprising tryptophan-57 and leucine-58 on the folded core domain of Nef (34). On the other hand, a dileucine motif (i.e., ENTSLL, residues 160 to 165) (14, 22, 32) and a diacidic motif (i.e., DD, residues 174 and 175) (3) (residues correspond to the NL4-3 clone of HIV-1) within a C-terminal, flexible loop of Nef bind to the α and σ2 subunits of AP-2 (17, 18, 25, 51). AP-2, in turn, binds to clathrin, leading to the concentration of CD4 within clathrin-coated pits (15, 33). These pits eventually bud from the plasma membrane as clathrin-coated vesicles that deliver internalized CD4 to endosomes. In essence, then, Nef acts as a connector that confers on CD4 the ability to be rapidly internalized in a manner similar to endocytic receptors (75).Unlike typical endocytic recycling receptors like the transferrin receptor or the low-density lipoprotein receptor, however, CD4 that is forcibly internalized by Nef does not return to the cell surface but is delivered to lysosomes for degradation (4, 64, 68). Thus, expression of Nef decreases both the surface and total levels of CD4. What keeps internalized CD4 from returning to the plasma membrane? We hypothesized that Nef might additionally act on endosomes to direct CD4 to lysosomes. This is precisely the fate followed by signaling receptors, transporters, and other transmembrane proteins that undergo ubiquitination-mediated internalization and targeting to the multivesicular body (MVB) pathway (40, 46). This targeting involves the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), including the ESCRT-0, -I, -II, and -III complexes, which function to sort ubiquitinated cargoes into intraluminal vesicles of MVBs for eventual degradation in lysosomes (40, 46). Herein, we show that Nef indeed plays a novel role in targeting internalized CD4 from endosomes to the MVB pathway in an ESCRT-dependent manner. We also show that both Nef and CD4 undergo ubiquitination on lysine residues, but, strikingly, this modification is not required for CD4 targeting to the MVB pathway.