Comparative analysis of environmental DNA extraction and purification methods from different humic acid-rich soils

AIM: To establish a rapid, improved soil environmental DNA extraction and purification protocol. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three different soil DNA isolation and four purification strategies were compared on different soil samples with variable rates of success. Bead beating extraction gave significantly higher DNA yields than microwave-based and liquid nitrogen grinding DNA extraction methods. The inclusion of soil washing prior to cell lysis decreased the amount of purification steps required. Although these soil types differed, polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP)-sepharose 2B column elution was sufficient for all three samples, yielding DNA pure enough for successful application in molecular studies. One soil sample retained 80% of the initial DNA after successful purification. CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of a purification protocol confirmed that only a combination of previously described methods proved sufficient in yielding pure environmental DNA from humic-rich soils. Total processing time for DNA extraction and subsequent purification from multiple samples was considerably more rapid than the previously described methods. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study developed a new optimized soil DNA extraction and purification protocol that is suitable for different environmental sources that are rich in humic acid content.     

Comparative assessment of DNA extraction methods for identification of glanders and melioidosis etiological agents by PCR

Pathogenic Burkholderia are considered as a cause of dangerous infections and potential agents of bioterrorism. Comparative assessment of different methods of extraction and purification of DNA for PCR analysis of pure cultures and samples contaminated by etiological agents of glanders and melioidosis was performed. Samples of soil and food artificially contaminated by pathogenic Burkholderia as well as organs of infected animals were tested. DNA was extracted by methods of boiling, nucleosorption with presence of guanidine thiocyanate, guanidine thiocyanatephenol extraction, guanidine thiocyanate-phenol extraction with additional purification of DNA by nucleosorption. Amplification was performed by "Flash" technique and detector of fluorescence was used for analysis of PCR products. Utilization of the recommended methods of preparation depending on the nature of sample let to detect by the "Flash" technique the etiological agents of glanders and melioidosis in concentration =10(3) microbial cells per ml. Choice of DNA extraction and purification methods is determined by type of a sample and presence in it of admixtures inhibiting PCR.     

一种新的小分子DNA纯化方法——石英棉纯化法

建立了小分子DNA的高效分离纯化方法,适合于分离几十到300个核苷酸组成的基因,在此基础上,建立更大的DNA片段的分离纯化方法。对不同大小的DNA片段经琼脂糖凝胶电泳后,采用石英棉分离纯化法纯化DNA。结果显示,石英棉的分离效果最好,对于200个碱基以下的DNA的回收率约高达90%以上,对于300个碱基的DNA回收率为约85~90,该项技术纯化的DNA的酶切、酶连效率与试剂盒法纯化的DNA的酶切、酶连效率相同。该分离纯化DNA技术明显优于试剂盒方法。     

风沙土微生物总DNA不同提取和纯化方法比较

为筛选和建立风沙土中总DNA的提取和纯化方法,选取了5种直接提取法、1种间接提取法和2种纯化法分别对风沙土中总DNA进行了提取和纯化,并对其质量和产量进行了比较.结果表明：6种方法均可从风沙土中提取到大小为23 kb左右的总DNA,其中改进后的高盐提取法（用40%聚乙二醇8000和4 mol·L^-1 NaCl沉淀DNA）效果最好,纯化后总DNA的纯度最高,可进行16S rDNA的PCR扩增,且产量仅稍低于试剂盒提取法;电泳加柱回收纯化法的纯化效果较好,经该方法纯化后的总DNA大部分可进行PCR扩增,可满足后续分子操作对DNA纯度的要求.     

Extraction and purification of DNA in rhizosphere soil samples for PCR-DGGE analysis of bacterial consortia

Application of DNA fingerprinting methods enables the detection of diverse members of soil bacterial consortia, even including those bacteria not yet cultivated. However, extraction and purification of DNA from soil samples without bias is difficult. We compared five different DNA isolation methods and three purification methods for rhizosphere soil samples. Purified DNA extracts were amplified in PCR using universal bacterial primers and the PCR products were analysed with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for the visualisation of DNA bands representing dominant bacterial species. Both the isolation and purification methods affected the apparent bacterial community structure of the samples.     

Optimization of a high-throughput CTAB-based protocol for the extraction of qPCR-grade DNA from rumen fluid, plant and bacterial pure cultures

The quality and yield of extracted DNA are critical for the majority of downstream applications in molecular biology. Moreover, molecular techniques such as quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) are becoming increasingly widespread; thus, validation and cross-laboratory comparison of data require standardization of upstream experimental procedures. DNA extraction methods depend on the type and size of starting material(s) used. As such, the extraction of template DNA is arguably the most significant variable when cross-comparing data from different laboratories. Here, we describe a reliable, inexpensive and rapid method of DNA purification that is equally applicable to small or large scale or high-throughput purification of DNA. The protocol relies on a CTAB-based buffer for cell lysis and further purification of DNA with phenol : chloroform : isoamyl alcohol. The protocol has been used successfully for DNA purification from rumen fluid and plant cells. Moreover, after slight alterations, the same protocol was used for large-scale extraction of DNA from pure cultures of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The yield of the DNA obtained with this method exceeded that from the same samples using commercial kits, and the quality was confirmed by successful qPCR applications.     

大鼠肠内容物细菌基因组DNA提取方法的比较

目的比较两种肠内容物前处理和两种提取方法对清洁级SD大鼠肠内容物细菌基因组DNA提取效率。方法分别选用PBS多次离心漂洗、液氮破细胞两种前处理方法和酚/氯仿抽提、试剂盒过柱法两种提取方法进行组合分析,对4份肠内容物和16份含金黄色葡萄球菌肠内容物进行随机提取。结果大鼠肠内容物细菌基因组DNA含量和纯度测定结果显示,与PBS反复离心相比,液氮研磨前处理能显著提高大鼠肠内容物基因组DNA。荧光定量PCR表明,液氮研磨前处理较PBS反复离心能更好地收集细菌基因组DNA,其Ct值最低。结论研究结果表明,采用液氮研磨试剂盒法在大鼠肠内容物DNA提取中是较为优良的方法,该方法为建立实验动物中微生物的定量PCR检测方法打下了基础。     

高温环境样品总DNA直接和间接提取方法的比较

分别采用两种环境总DNA直接提取法和一种间接提取法从6种温泉菌席样品中提取总DNA,以DNA粗产物的纯度、能否用于后续PCR扩增及PCR-DGGE(变性梯度凝胶电泳)所反映的微生物多样性为评价指标对两类方法进行比较和评价。研究发现,虽然间接提取法效率低下,但对于高温极端环境中生物量较小的样品,间接法能得到有研究价值的、纯度较高的环境样品总DNA,而直接法得到的DNA量小且不适于PCR扩增操作。在使用这2类方法都能得到可用于研究操作的DNA的情况下,间接提取法能更好的体现环境样品中微生物的多样性。     

Comparing the performance of three ancient DNA extraction methods for high‐throughput sequencing

The DNA molecules that can be extracted from archaeological and palaeontological remains are often degraded and massively contaminated with environmental microbial material. This reduces the efficacy of shotgun approaches for sequencing ancient genomes, despite the decreasing sequencing costs of high‐throughput sequencing (HTS). Improving the recovery of endogenous molecules from the DNA extraction and purification steps could, thus, help advance the characterization of ancient genomes. Here, we apply the three most commonly used DNA extraction methods to five ancient bone samples spanning a ~30 thousand year temporal range and originating from a diversity of environments, from South America to Alaska. We show that methods based on the purification of DNA fragments using silica columns are more advantageous than in solution methods and increase not only the total amount of DNA molecules retrieved but also the relative importance of endogenous DNA fragments and their molecular diversity. Therefore, these methods provide a cost‐effective solution for downstream applications, including DNA sequencing on HTS platforms.     

Adsorptive purification of pDNA on superporous rigid cross-linked cellulose matrix

Use of plasmid DNA (pDNA) in the emerging gene therapy requires pure DNA in large quantities requiring production of safe DNA on large scale. While a number of kit-based DNA purification techniques have become popular, large scale cost effective purification of DNA remains a technological challenge. Most traditional, as well as newly developed methods for DNA purification are expensive, tedious, use toxic reagents, and/or generally not amenable for scaled up production. Our attempts to develop a scalable adsorptive separation technology resulted in successful use of indigenously developed rigid cross-linked cellulose beads for single step purification of pDNA from alkaline cell lysates. This mode of purification employs a combination of intra-particle interactions that could give a product plasmid DNA free from chromosomal DNA, RNA and host proteins in a single scalable chromatographic step. The technology can be employed as a batch adsorption step on small scale, or on a large scale column chromatography. A high copy number 9.8 kb plasmid (from an Escherichia coli strain) was purified in yields of 77 and 52%, respectively in batch and column modes. The product obtained was homogeneous supercoiled plasmid with no RNA and protein contamination confirmed by quantitative analysis, agarose gel electrophoresis and SDS-PAGE.     

Reversed-phase ion-pair liquid chromatography method for purification of duplex DNA with single base pair resolution

Obtaining quantities of highly pure duplex DNA is a bottleneck in the biophysical analysis of protein–DNA complexes. In traditional DNA purification methods, the individual cognate DNA strands are purified separately before annealing to form DNA duplexes. This approach works well for palindromic sequences, in which top and bottom strands are identical and duplex formation is typically complete. However, in cases where the DNA is non-palindromic, excess of single-stranded DNA must be removed through additional purification steps to prevent it from interfering in further experiments. Here we describe and apply a novel reversed-phase ion-pair liquid chromatography purification method for double-stranded DNA ranging in lengths from 17 to 51 bp. Both palindromic and non-palindromic DNA can be readily purified. This method has the unique ability to separate blunt double-stranded DNA from pre-attenuated (n-1, n-2, etc) synthesis products, and from DNA duplexes with single base pair overhangs. Additionally, palindromic DNA sequences with only minor differences in the central spacer sequence of the DNA can be separated, and the purified DNA is suitable for co-crystallization of protein–DNA complexes. Thus, double-stranded ion-pair liquid chromatography is a useful approach for duplex DNA purification for many applications.     

Innovative methods for soil DNA purification tested in soils with widely differing characteristics

Seven methods of soil DNA extraction and purification were tested in a set of 14 soils differing in bedrock, texture, pH, salinity, moisture, organic matter content, and vegetation cover. The methods introduced in this study included pretreatment of soil with CaCO(3) or purification of extracted DNA by CaCl(2). The performance of innovated methods was compared to that of the commercial kit Mo Bio PowerSoil and the phenol-chloroform-based method of D. N. Miller, J. E. Bryant, E. L. Madsen, and W. C. Ghiorse (Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4715-4724, 1999). This study demonstrated significant differences between the tested methods in terms of DNA yield, PCR performance, and recovered bacterial diversity. The differences in DNA yields were correlated to vegetation cover, soil pH, and clay content. The differences in PCR performances were correlated to vegetation cover and soil pH. The innovative methods improved PCR performance in our set of soils, in particular for forest acidic soils. PCR was successful in 95% of cases by the method using CaCl(2) purification and in 93% of cases by the method based on CaCO(3) pretreatment, but only in 79% by Mo Bio PowerSoil, for our range of soils. Also, the innovative methods recovered a higher percentage of actinomycete diversity from a subset of three soils. Recommendations include the assessment of soil characteristics prior to selecting the optimal protocol for soil DNA extraction and purification.     

Isolation of genomic DNA from blood using a novel filter-based DNA purification technology

A novel DNA purification technology is described that enables the purification of pure dsDNA from blood. When compared to existing DNA purification methods, the Whatman BioScience Purification System (WBPS) offers a fast and convenient way to recover high yields of DNA. WBPS is based on a unique filter system that entraps DNA within a matrix. This allows the process to be performed in a single unidirectional reaction vessel, reducing user interaction and multiple centrifugation steps.     

In situ synthesis of protein arrays

In situ or on-chip protein array methods use cell free expression systems to produce proteins directly onto an immobilising surface from co-distributed or pre-arrayed DNA or RNA, enabling protein arrays to be created on demand. These methods address three issues in protein array technology: (i) efficient protein expression and availability, (ii) functional protein immobilisation and purification in a single step and (iii) protein on-chip stability over time. By simultaneously expressing and immobilising many proteins in parallel on the chip surface, the laborious and often costly processes of DNA cloning, expression and separate protein purification are avoided. Recently employed methods reviewed are PISA (protein in situ array) and NAPPA (nucleic acid programmable protein array) from DNA and puromycin-mediated immobilisation from mRNA.     

Compaction agent protection of nucleic acids during mechanical lysis

Mechanical lysis is an efficient and widely used method of liberating the contents of microbial cells, but the sensitivity of large nucleic acids to shear damage has prevented the application of mechanical lysis to DNA purification. It is demonstrated that polycationic compaction agents can protect DNA from shear damage and allow chromosomal and plasmid DNA purification by mechanical lysis. In addition to being substantially protected during mechanical lysis, the compacted DNA can be separated with the insoluble cell debris, washed, and selectively resolubilized, yielding a substantially purified DNA product. An additional benefit of this method is that lysate viscosity is greatly reduced, allowing the use of much smaller processing volumes when compared with traditional lysis methods used in nucleic acid purification.     

Plasmid DNA production combining antibiotic‐free selection,inducible high yield fermentation,and novel autolytic purification

DNA vaccines and gene medicines, derived from bacterial plasmids, are emerging as an important new class of pharmaceuticals. However, the challenges of performing cell lysis processes for plasmid DNA purification at an industrial scale are well known. To address downstream purification challenges, we have developed autolytic Escherichia coli host strains that express endolysin (phage λR) in the cytoplasm. Expression of the endolysin is induced during fermentation by a heat inducible promoter. The endolysin remains in the cytoplasm, where it is separated from its peptidoglycan substrate in the cell wall; hence the cells remain alive and intact and can be harvested by the usual methods. The plasmid DNA is then recovered by autolytic extraction under slightly acidic, low salt buffer conditions and treatment with a low concentration of non‐ionic detergent. Under these conditions the E. coli genomic DNA remains associated with the insoluble cell debris and is removed by a solid–liquid separation. Here, we report fermentation, lysis methods, and plasmid purification using autolytic hosts. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009; 104: 505–515 © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A rapid method for determining the relationship between cDNA clones

We describe a technique for rapidly screening the inserts of plasmids for homology to each other by using DNA fragments isolated in agarose gels to probe Southern blots of DNA prepared by the "miniprep" alkaline lysis method. The procedure includes a technique for labeling DNA fragments in agarose gel slices without further purification. The protocol results in a significant savings in time and expense and a considerable increase in fragment yield over methods involving fragment purification from polyacrylamide or agarose gels.     

An optimized DNA extraction and purification method from dairy manure compost for genetic diversity analysis

An unbiased DNA extraction protocol is necessary for analysis of genetic diversity, particularly, of genes in complex environmental samples by nucleic acid techniques. In the present study, three manual extraction methods and two commonly used commercial kits, which were accompanied by two DNA purification strategies, were compared based on cell lysis efficiency, DNA and humic acid yields, PCR amplification and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis. The results show that in spite of higher cell lysis efficiencies of the two commercial kits, the purified DNA yields were only one-third of that obtained by the two manual methods of FTSP (Freeze–thaw–SDS–Protein K) and FTSPP (Freeze–thaw–SDS–Protein K-Polyvinylpolypyrrolidone). The purified DNA from all five methods was pure enough for successful PCR and real-time PCR amplifications in the presence of 1 μg μL^?1 BSA. However, the FTSPP extraction method with DNA purification by a Wizard^® kit yielded the largest number of 16S rRNA gene copies and ribotypes or bands in DGGE profiles, which indicated a superiority over the other four methods. The development of this optimized DNA extraction and purification method may provide a valuable tool for further molecular analysis of compost.     

Desalting minimal amounts of DNA for electroporation in <Emphasis Type="Italic">E. coli</Emphasis>: a comparison of different physical methods

Recovery and purification of ligated plasmid DNA is a critical and limiting step in modern molecular cloning techniques prior to electroporation in E. coli. Four different DNA purification and desalting methods were compared in regard to simple handling, reproducibility, efficiency and cost-effectiveness using picogram and nanogram amounts of DNA. Microcolumn purification of DNA was up to two orders of magnitude more efficient compared to gel filtration, ethanol precipitation or drop dialysis.Revisions requested 14 April 2005; Revisions received 10 May 2005     

四种土壤微生物总DNA的纯化方法的比较

比较了4种从土壤中直接抽提的微生物总DNA的纯化方法,实验结果表明1 %的琼脂糖凝胶电泳纯化方法及葡聚糖凝胶G 2 0 0离心层析纯化方法均不能完全纯化从土壤中抽提的微生物总DNA。若将直接抽提的总DNA先经葡聚糖凝胶G 2 0 0离心层析纯化,再用1 %的琼脂糖凝胶电泳纯化,则能取得较好的纯化效果。含2 %PVP的1 %琼脂糖凝胶电泳纯化,用DNA凝胶回收试剂盒回收后没有得到纯化后的土壤微生物总DNA。