MTHFR polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) have been reported to alter the risk of ovarian cancer. However, the results are still inconclusive. For better understanding of the effect of these two polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. An extensive search was performed to identify all case–control studies investigating such association. The strength of association between these two polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk was assessed by odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95?% confidence interval (95?% CI). 3,496 cases and 3,631 controls for C677T polymorphism and 3,280 cases and 3,346 controls for A1298C polymorphism were included in this meta-analysis. The results suggested that there were no significant associations between C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk in overall comparisons in all genetic models (For C677T: TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.94, 95?% CI?=?0.71–1.24, P?=?0.65; CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.03, 95?% CI?=?0.93–1.14, P?=?0.57; TT/CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.01, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.16, P?=?0.87; TT vs. CC/CT: OR?=?0.93, 95?% CI?=?0.72–1.20, P?=?0.58. For A1298C: CC vs. AA: OR?=?1.05, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.25, P?=?0.65; CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.98, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.08, P?=?0.66; CC/CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.99, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.09, P?=?0.85; CC vs. AA/CA: OR?=?1.06, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.26, P?=?0.46). Subgroup analysis based on ethnicities and influence analysis did not perturb the results. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are not associated with ovarian cancer risk, especially in Caucasians.     

Quantitative assessment of the effect of MTHFR polymorphisms on the risk of lung carcinoma

Published studies on the relationships between 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms and lung cancer risk have been conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and lung cancer risk. A total of 15 studies including 10,753 cases and 11,275 controls described C677T genotypes, among which 11 articles totalling 6,161 cases and 7,684 controls described A1298C genotypes, were also involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significantly elevated lung cancer risk was found in any genetic models when all studies were pooled. For C677T polymorphism: (TT vs. CC: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.97–1.42; TC vs. CC: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.94–1.20; dominant model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.96–1.24; and recessive model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.95–1.24); for A1298C polymorphism: (CC vs. AA: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.91–1.19; AC vs. AA: OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.91–1.06; dominant model: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.92–1.06; and recessive model: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.92–1.20). In the subgroup analyses, the results showed that 677T varients could decrease lung cancer risk in female (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.41–0.95, P-value = 0.03, 677CC as reference). No evidence of any associations of MTHFR A1298C polymorphism with lung cancer was found in overall or subgroup analyses. Our meta-analysis supports that the common polymorphisms of C677T and A1298C in MTHFR gene are not susceptibility gene for lung cancer from currently available evidence.     

MTHFR C677T polymorphism contributes to colorectal cancer susceptibility: evidence from 61 case–control studies

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is believed to be involved in folate metabolism which plays a critical role in carcinogenesis. To date, many case-control studies have investigated the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk. However, the results were inconsistent. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the association, we conducted this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis recruited 61 published studies which were selected by a search of PubMed up to 31st September 2011, including 16,111 colorectal cancer cases and 23,192 controls. We used crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95?% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility. Our results showed that MTHFR C667T polymorphism contributed to the decreased colorectal cancer risk in overall population (for TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.89, 95?% CI?=?0.82-0.97; for TT vs. CT/CC: OR?=?0.88, 95?% CI?=?0.83-0.92). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, the results also indicated a correlation between the T allele of MTHFR C667T and the colorectal cancer risk in Asian population (for TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.82, 95?% CI?=?0.69-0.97; for TT vs. CT/CC: OR?=?0.81, 95?% CI?=?0.74-0.90). Additionally, the correlation was also observed in male subgroup in sub-analysis by gender (for TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.82, 95?% CI?=?0.71-0.93; for TT vs. CT/CC: OR?=?0.81, 95?% CI?=?0.71-0.92). In summary, our meta-analysis strongly indicated the MTHFR C667T polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of CRC.     

Association of excision repair cross-complimentary group 1 gene polymorphisms with breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility

The role of excision repair cross-complimentary group 1 (ERCC1) gene polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancer development has long been controversial and existing data were inconsistent. Here, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to better clarify the association. Case-control studies published from December 2008 to November 2018 were assessed. The statistical analyses of the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Fifteen articles with 24 case-control studies and 3 ERCC1 polymorphisms were enrolled. A total of 20 923 participants including 9896 cases and 11 027 controls were analyzed. The results showed that C to T variation in the ERCC1 rs11615 (C/T) polymorphisms was correlated with breast cancer susceptibility (T vs C: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02-1.38; TT + CT vs CC: OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.12-1.36). ERCC1 rs3212986 (C/A) polymorphisms posed an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer as whole (A vs C: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01-1.25; AA + CA vs CC: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.22), and presented especially higher risk for ovarian cancer (A vs C: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.05-1.63; AA vs CA + CC: OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.12-2.47; AA vs CC: OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.12-2.64). Meanwhile, neither overall group analyses nor stratified analyses displayed any association of ERCC1 rs2298881 (A/C) polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. This meta-analysis suggested that ERCC1 rs11615 (C/T) polymorphisms were associated with breast cancer susceptibility and rs3212986 (C/A) polymorphisms were especially correlated with ovarian cancer risk. More case-control studies with well-adjusted data and diverse populations are essential for validation of our conclusion.     

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotypes and haplotypes associated with susceptibility to colorectal cancer in an eastern Chinese Han population

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) plays an important role in folate metabolism and is involved in DNA synthesis, DNA repair and DNA methylation. The two common functional polymorphisms of MTHFR, C677T and A1298C have been associated with several diseases, including cancer. We made a case-control study to analyze a possible association of MTHFR gene polymorphisms C677T and A1298C with risk for colorectal cancer in an eastern Chinese Han population of 137 patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of CRC and 145 age- and gender-matched controls with no history of cancer. DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples and the genotypes were determined by PCR-RFLP. The concentrations of folate in plasma were measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay. The MTHFR 677TT genotype had a protective effect against colorectal cancer, with an odds ratio (OR) = 0.467 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.225-0.966). The 1298CC genotype was significantly correlated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (OR = 0.192; 95%CI = 0.040-0.916). Compared with the MTHFR 677CC and MTHFR 1298 AA genotypes, for individuals who carried both MTHFR 677CC and 1298CC genotypes, the OR of colorectal cancer was 0.103 (95%CI = 0.012-0.900); among individuals who carried both MTHFR 677TT and 1298AC genotypes, the OR for risk of colorectal cancer was 0.169 (95%CI = 0.044-0.654). MTHFR 677TT+CT genotypes had a significantly lower plasma folate concentration than those with the MTHFR 677CC genotype. MTHFR 1298AC+CC genotypes had a lower plasma folate concentration than those with the MTHFR 1298AA genotype (P < 0.05). In conclusion, subjects with the MTHFR 677TT and MTHFR 1298CC genotypes appeared to have a significantly lower risk for colorectal cancer. MTHFR haplotypes 677CC/1298CC and 677TT/1298AC were less common in cases than in controls. These haplotypes, when compared to the most common haplotype 677CC/1298AA, were associated with a decreased risk for colorectal cancer. We conclude that plasma folate level is influenced by MTHFR genotypes.     

Meta-analysis on the association of nucleotide excision repair gene XPD A751C variant and cancer susceptibility among Indian population

Polymorphism A751C (A>C) in XPD gene has shown susceptibility to many cancers in Indian population; however the results of these studies are inconclusive. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to estimate the association between XPD A751C polymorphism and overall cancer susceptibility. We quantitavely synthesized all published studies of the association between XPD A751C polymorphism and cancer risk. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % CI were estimated for allele contrast, homozygous, heterozygous, dominant and recessive genetic model. A total of thirteen studies including 3,599 controls and 3,087 cancer cases were identified and analyzed. Overall significant results were observed for C allele carrier (C vs. A: p = 0.001; OR 1.372, 95 % CI 1.172–1.605) variant homozygous (CC vs. AA: p = 0.001; OR 1.691, 95 % CI 1.280–2.233) and heterozygous (AC vs. AA: p = 0.001; OR 1.453, 95 % CI 1.215–1.737) genotypes. Similarly dominant (CC+AC vs. AA: p = 0.001; OR 1.512, 95 % CI 1.244–1.839) and recessive (CC vs. AA+AC: p = 0.001; OR 1.429, 95 % CI 1.151–1.774) genetic models also demonstrated risk of developing cancer. This meta-analysis suggested that XPD A751C polymorphism likely contribute to cancer susceptibility in Indian population. Further studies about gene–gene and gene–environment interactions are required.     

MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and cervical carcinoma susceptibility: meta-analyses based on 4421 individuals

MTHFR polymorphisms have been implicated as risk factors for several cancers. Studies have conducted on the associations of MTHFR polymorphisms with cervical carcinoma risk and have generated inconclusive results. The aim of the present study was to increase power demonstrating the possible relations. Meta-analyses examining the association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and cervical carcinoma risk were performed. Separate analyses on ethnicity and source of controls were also implemented. Eligible studies were identified for the period up to Dec 2011. Eleven case-control studies containing 1859 cases and 2562 controls regarding MTHFR C677T polymorphisms were selected, of which four studies containing 461 cases and 832 controls described A1298C polymorphisms. For the overall data, no associations of MTHFR C677T polymorphisms with cervical carcinoma were observed (TT vs CC: OR = 1.07; 95 %CI = 0.73-1.58; dominant model: OR = 0.89; 95 %CI = 0.66-1.18; recessive model: OR = 1.13; 95 %CI = 0.84-1.52). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, MTHFR 677T allele was associated with decreased cervical cancer susceptibility among Caucasians (TT vs CC: OR = 0.65; 95 %CI = 0.45-0.93; dominant model: OR = 0.70; 95 %CI = 0.58-0.86) but not Asians. As for A1298C polymorphism, no marked associations of A1298C genetic variation with cervical cancer risk were observed (CC vs AA: OR = 1.01; 95 %CI = 0.60-1.73; dominant model: OR = 1.17; 95 %CI = 0.91-1.49; recessive model: OR = 0.99; 95 %CI = 0.60-1.63). Collectively, the results of the present study suggest that MTHFR 677T allele might play a preventive role for cervical carcinoma among Caucasians. A1298C polymorphisms might exert little effect on cervical cancerigenesis.     

The association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 18, 628 individuals

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) enzyme plays an important role in folate metabolism and MTHFR polymorphisms have been suggested to be associated with risk of various cancers. MTHFR C677T polymorphism is a common genetic alteration and may affect the host susceptibility to ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk by performing a meta-analysis. Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) databases were searched for case–control studies investigating the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ovarian cancer. Odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was used to assess this possible association. 13 individual case–control studies from 10 publications with a total of 18, 628 subjects (5, 932 cases and 12, 696 controls) were included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analyses showed there was no association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk in Caucasians under all five genetic models (All P values for the pooled ORs were more than 0.05), whereas there was an obvious association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk in Asians under four genetic models (for T vs C, OR (95 % CI) = 1.38(1.19–1.61); for TT vs CC, OR (95 % CI) = 2.32(1.63–3.29); for TT vs TC+CC, OR (95 % CI) = 2.04(1.47–2.85); for TT+TC vs CC, OR (95 % CI) = 1.36(1.12–1.65)). Subgroup analyses suggested ethnicity was the major source of heterogeneity. This meta-analysis supports an association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk, and there might be a race-specific effect in this association. Further studies with large sample size and careful design are needed to identify this association more comprehensively.     

Quantitative assessment of the association between TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism and cancer risk

The findings regarding the relation of transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) to cancer risk have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the association between TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. A meta-analysis of nine investigations with 2800 cases and 1620 controls was conducted to gain a better understanding of the effect of TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism on cancer risk. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the strength of the correlation between TAP2 gene polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. The pooled results from TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism showed a decreased risk of cancer in two dominant genetic models (GG + AG vs AA: OR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; AG vs AA: OR = 0.85, 95% CI, 0.73-0.99). From the subgroup analysis, decreased cancer susceptibility was found in Caucasians (GG + AG vs AA: OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.68-0.99), especially among the subgroup of cervical carcinoma (GG + AG vs AA: OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.96; AG vs AA: OR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.70-0.99). Overall, the results suggest that TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism contributes to decreased cancer susceptibility.     

Association between CASP3 polymorphisms and overall cancer risk: A meta-analysis of case-control studies

Several studies inspected the relationship between caspase-3 (CASP3) polymorphisms and the risk of several human cancers, but the findings remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis aiming to inspect the association between CASP3 rs1049216 T>C, rs12108497 C>T, rs4647603 G>A, rs4647602 C>A, rs6948 T>G, rs2705897 A>C, and rs113420705 G>A polymorphisms and cancer risk. Eligible studies were recognized by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to quantitatively evaluate the association between each polymorphism of CASP3 and cancer risk. The rs4647603 variant significantly increased the risk of cancer in an overdominant (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03-2.01; P = 0.03; AG vs AA+GG) inheritance model. Regarding the rs4647602 variant, the findings revealed that this variant was associated with protection against cancer in homozygous codominant (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.80; P < 0.00001; AA vs CC), dominant (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96; P = 0.009; AC+AA vs CC), recessive (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.79; P < 0.00001; AA vs AC+CC), and allele (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88; P = 0.00001; A vs C) models. The findings suggested that the rs2705897 variant significantly decreased the risk of cancer in heterozygous codominant (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94; P = 0.009; AC vs AA), dominant (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = 0.009; AC+CC vs AA), overdominant (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.95; P = 0.01; AC vs CC+AA), and allele (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97; P = 0.02; C vs A) models. The results did not support an association between CASP3 rs1049216 and rs6948 polymorphisms and cancer risk. In summary, the findings of this meta-analysis support an association between CASP3 polymorphisms and cancer risk. Larger and well-designed studies are desired to evaluate these associations in detail.     

Three genetic polymorphisms of homocysteine-metabolizing enzymes and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis based on 23 case-control studies

Many epidemiological studies have explored the relationships between three genetic polymorphisms of genes encoding homocysteine-metabolizing enzymes (methionine synthase [MTR] A2756G, methionine synthase reductase [MTRR] A66G, and N(5),N(10)-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase [MTHFR] A1298C) and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), but no conclusive results were obtained. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of 23 case-control studies. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to examine the strength of the associations. Among those primary studies, 22 studies were for Europeans, and one study focused on the MTR A2756G polymorphism in Asians. The results of combined analyses of the MTR A2756G polymorphism suggested that the G allele was associated with increased risk of CHD and myocardial infarction (MI) especially for Europeans (GG vs. AA for CHD: OR [95% CI]=1.63 [1.18-2.25], p(z)(-test)=0.001, p(heterogeneity)=0.274; GG+AG vs. AA for MI: OR [95% CI]=1.44 [1.08-1.93], p(z)(-test)=0.014, p(heterogeneity)=0.611). In addition, the G allele was also associated with higher risk CHD based on population-based case-control studies (PCC) (GG vs. AA: OR [95% CI]=1.75 [1.24-2.49], p(z)(-test)=0.002, p(heterogeneity)=0.316). The results suggested that the MTRR A66G polymorphism was not associated with risk of CHD for Europeans (AA vs. GG: OR [95% CI]=1.07 [0.59-1.94], p(z)(-test)=0.831, p(heterogeneity)<0.01). The results suggested that the C allele of the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism might be associated with the increased risk of MI for Europeans (CC vs. CA+AA: OR [95% CI]=1.37 [1.03-1.84], p(z)(-test)=0.033, p(heterogeneity)=0.668). However, when subgroup analyses for sources of controls were performed, conflicting results were obtained. The results suggested that the C allele was associated with decreased risk of CHD based on hospital-based case-control studies, but associated with increased risk of CHD based on PCC. This meta-analysis suggests that MTR A2756G polymorphism, but not MTRR A66G and MTHFR A1298C, is associated with risk of CHD for Europeans. Because of limitations and potential bias, more well-designed studies with larger sample size, especially focused on Asians and Africans, should be performed in the future.     

Quantitative assessment of the associations between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis

Many studies have investigated the associations between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures, but the impact of MTHFR polymorphisms on fractures risk is unclear owing to the obvious inconsistence among those studies. This study aims to quantify the strength of association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures. We searched the PubMed, Embase and Wanfang databases for articles relating the association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and risk of fractures in humans. We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) with their confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the associations. Meta-analyses suggested MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with increased risk of any site fractures (for T vs. C, OR = 1.17, 95 % CI 1.03–1.32; for TT vs. CC, OR = 1. 31, 95 % CI 1.11–1.54; for TT vs. CT, OR = 1.22, 95 % CI 1.04–1.43; for TT vs. CT/CC, OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.13–1.51). Besides, MTHFR A1298C polymorphism was also associated with increased risk of any site fractures. Subgroup meta-analyses suggested MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with increased risk of vertebral fractures under three genetic contrast modes (for TT vs. CC, OR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.05–1.95; for TT vs. CT, OR = 1.36, 95 % CI 1.01–1.85; for TT vs. CT/CC, OR = 1.50, 95 % CI 1.17–1.91), but there was no association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of hip fractures and non-vertebral fractures (all P values were more than 0.05). Thus, individuals with homozygote genotype TT of MTHFR C677T have obviously increased risk of vertebral fractures compared those with heterozygote genotype CT or homozygote genotype CC. There is no association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of hip fractures and non-vertebral fractures.     

Association between MTHFR polymorphisms and orofacial clefts risk: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The roles of C677T and A1298C polymorphisms in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene in orofacial clefts (OFCs) risk have been substantially explored, but the results remain conflicting. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis involving all eligible studies. METHODS: Electronic literature searches of the PubMed, EmBase, and Medline databases were performed up to October 31, 2011. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for two genetic comparisons (heterozygous mutation vs. wild type, homozygous mutation vs. wild type). RESULTS A total of 18 studies were ultimately identified. The pooled results revealed no statistical association between infant and maternal C677T and A1298C variants and risk of cleft lip with or without palate (CL/P) or cleft palate only (CPO), except for the maternal 677TT genotype for CL/P, the OR was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.63) as compared to the normal 677CC genotype. In the subgroup analyses on CL/P data based on ethnicity and source of control subjects, almost all of the results were replicated as nonsignificant associations in both examined polymorphisms, whereas the pooled risk estimate calculated for maternal 677TT genotype in the white population remained statistically significant, with an OR of 1.36 (95% CI, 1.05-1.76). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis suggests that maternal MTHFR 677TT genotype might increase the risk of having a CL/P offspring in the white population. However, these findings remain to be confirmed by additional investigations.     

Association between SHBG Asp327Asn (rs6259) polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 10,454 cases and 13,111 controls

Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) is a plasma glycoprotein that plays an important role in breast cancer pathophysiology and risk definition, since it regulates the bioavailable fraction of circulating estradiol. Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between SHBG Asp327Asn polymorphism and breast cancer risk in diverse populations. However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. This meta-analysis of literatures was performed to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. A total of 10 studies were identified for the meta-analysis, including 10,454 cases and 13,111 controls for SHBG Asp327Asn polymorphism. When all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was no evidence for significant association between SHBG Asp327Asn polymorphism and breast cancer risk (for Asn/Asn vs. Asp/Asp: OR = 1.20, 95 % CI = 0.94-1.55; for Asp/Asn vs. Asp/Asp: OR = 0.94, 95 % CI = 0.87-1.01; for dominant model: OR = 0.95, 95 % CI = 0.90-1.02; for recessive model: OR = 1.22, 95 % CI = 0.95-1.57). In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, menopausal status, and source of controls, no significant associations were found in all genetic models. Interestingly, further analyses stratified by menopausal status in different ethnicities revealed that this polymorphism might provide protective effects against breast cancer risk in postmenopausal Asian women (for dominant model: OR = 0.83, 95 % CI = 0.70-0.97). Sensitivity analyses were performed by sequential removal of individual studies and cumulative statistics have showed combined ORs were not materially altered by any individual study under all comparisons. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that SHBG Asp327Asn polymorphism is not associated with breast cancer risk overall, while it might be an important genetic susceptibility factor in postmenopausal Asian women for developing breast cancer. Larger and well-designed studies are warranted to confirm our findings in the future.     

miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphism is associated with cancer development among Asians and related to breast cancer susceptibility

To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphism (A>G) and cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 9 studies including 6,077 cases and 7,199 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significantly elevated cancer risk was associated with miR-499 G allele when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (AG vs. AA: OR?=?1.14, 95?% CI?=?0.98–1.32; GG vs. AA: OR?=?1.12, 95?% CI?=?0.95–1.33; dominant model: OR?=?1.13, 95?% CI?=?0.99–1.29; recessive model: OR?=?1.05, 95?% CI?=?0.83–1.33). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risk was only found for Asians (dominant model: OR?=?1.22, 95?% CI?=?1.02–1.46). When stratified by study design, no statistically significantly elevated risks were found in hospital-based studies or population-based studies. In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, significant cancer risk change was only found for breast cancer when miR-499 G allele was included (dominant model: OR?=?1.13, 95?% CI?=?1.01–1.26). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphism (A>G) is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development among Asians and may contribute to breast cancer susceptibility.     

Lack of association between miR-149 C>T polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 4,677 cases and 4,830 controls

To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between miR-149 C>T polymorphism and cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 8 studies including 4,677 cases and 4,830 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significantly elevated cancer risk was associated with miR-149 T allele when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (CT vs. CC: OR = 0.977, 95 % CI = 0.882-1.082; TT vs. CC: OR = 0.985, 95 % CI = 0.857-1.132; dominant model: OR = 0.984, 95 % CI = 0.893-1.084; recessive model: OR = 1.026, 95 % CI = 0.931-1.132). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity or study design, no significantly increased risks were found under all models. When stratified by cancer type, there were no significant cancer risk changes for lung cancer, breast cancer or colorectal cancer when miR-149 T allele was included. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the miR-149 C>T polymorphism may not contribute to cancer susceptibility.     

miR-196a2 C allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development

Published data on the association between miR-196a2 T/C polymorphism and cancer susceptibility are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 21 studies including 10,441 cases and 12,353 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated cancer risk was associated with miR-196a2 C allele when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (TC vs. TT: OR=1.23, 95% CI=1.11-1.36; CC vs. TT: OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.14-1.48; dominant model: OR=1.25, 95% CI=1.13-1.38). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were found in Asains (TC vs. TT: OR=1.24, 95% CI=1.10-1.40; CC vs. TT: OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.13-1.52; dominant model: OR=1.26, 95% CI=1.12-1.41) but with bordline statistical significance in Caucasians (TC vs. TT: OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.00-1.31). In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, statistically significantly increased risks were found for breast cancer (TC vs. TT: OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.01-1.31; CC vs. TT: OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.01-1.68; dominant model: OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.00-1.50; and recessive model: OR=1.11, 95% CI=1.01-1.23) and lung cancer (CC vs. TT: OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.10-1.54; and recessive model: OR=1.18, 95% CI=1.02-1.36). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in hospital-based studies (TC vs. TT: OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.13-1.49; CC vs. TT: OR=1.37, 95% CI=1.14-1.66; dominant model: OR=1.32, 95% CI=1.15-1.53) and population-based studies (CC vs. TT: OR=1.19, 95% CI=1.06-1.35; dominant model: OR=1.13, 95% CI=1.01-1.25). Despite some limitations, this meta-analysis suggests that the miR-196a2 C allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development.     

The association between common genetic variant of microRNA-146a and cancer susceptibility

Published data on the association between microRNA-146a (miR-146a) G/C polymorphism and cancer susceptibility are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 23 studies including 10,585 cases and 12,183 controls were used in the meta-analysis. Overall, no significant associations were found between miR-146a G/C polymorphism and cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (GC vs. CC: OR=1.08, 95% CI=0.94-1.24; GG vs. CC: OR=1.13, 95% CI=0.93-1.37; dominant model: OR=1.09, 95% CI=0.94-1.26). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, still no significant associations were found. In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, statistically significantly increased risks were found for papillary thyroid carcinoma (GC vs. CC: OR=3.44, 95% CI=1.86-6.34; GG vs. CC: OR=2.20, 95% CI=1.22-3.99; dominant model: OR=2.68, 95% CI=1.48-4.83). In the subgroup analysis by population-based controls or hospital-based controls, no statistically significantly increased risks were found. Despite some limitations, this meta-analysis suggests that the miR-146a G allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for papillary thyroid carcinoma development.     

The Association between MTHFR Gene Polymorphisms and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk was inconsistent and underpowered. To clarify the effects of MTHFR gene polymorphisms on the risk of HCC, a meta-analysis of all available studies relating C677T and/or A1298C polymorphisms of MTHFR gene to the risk of HCC was conducted.

Methods

The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) for the period up to July 2012. Data were extracted by two independent authors and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Metaregression and subgroup analyses were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity.

Results

Finally, 12 studies with 2,351 cases and 4,091 controls were included for C677T polymorphism and 6 studies with 1,333 cases and 1,878 controls were included for A1298C polymorphism. With respect to A1298C polymorphism, significantly decreased HCC risk was found in the overall population (CC vs. AA: OR = 0.660, 95%CI 0.460–0.946, P = 0.024; recessive model: OR = 0.667, 95%CI = 0.470–0.948, P = 0.024). In subgroup analyses, significantly decreased HCC risk was found in Asian population (CC vs. AA: OR = 0.647, 95%CI = 0.435–0.963; P = 0.032) and population-based studies (CC vs. AA: OR = 0.519, 95%CI = 0.327–0.823; P = 0.005). With respect to C677T polymorphism, no significant association with HCC risk was demonstrated in overall and stratified analyses.

Conclusions

We concluded that MTHFR A1298C polymorphism may play a protective role in the carcinogenesis of HCC. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm this association.     

Folate intake and MTHFR polymorphism C677T is not associated with ovarian cancer risk: evidence from the meta-analysis

Folate is essential for DNA synthesis and methylation and implicated in the process of carcinogenesis. Several studies inconclusively suggested increased folate intake may reduce ovarian cancer risk. Studies concerning the association between C677T polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), an important enzyme in folate metabolism, and ovarian cancer risk also resulted in no agreement. The meta-analysis was conducted based on current studies to assess the association between folate intake, the MTHFR C667T polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk. 1,158 cases out of 217,309 participants from four cohort studies, 4,519 cases and 6,031 controls from four case–control studies about folate intake along with 5,617 cases and 9,808 controls from 10 publications concerning the polymorphism were pooled, respectively. We detected no significant association between total folate (RR = 1.04, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.87–1.23) or dietary folate (RR = 0.88, 95 % CI = 0.75–1.05) intake and ovarian cancer risk, and also no significant relationship was found between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk (TT vs. CC: odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95 % CI = 0.90–1.46; CT vs. CC: OR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 0.94–1.16). Our analysis indicated neither folate intake nor MTHFR C677T polymorphism is related to altered susceptibility of ovarian cancer.