Plasma levels of insulin-like binding protein-2 in prepubertal short children and its diagnostic value in the evaluation of growth hormone deficiency

AIM: This study was designed to investigate whether determination of plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) levels could be of benefit in the evaluation of childhood growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD). METHOD: A retrospective analysis was performed on 91 prepubertal children referred for investigation of short stature. Maximal GH levels in plasma after provocative stimuli were between 1.0 and 93.0 mU/l, 6 subjects exhibiting peak values of <5 mU/l. Initially a GH peak of 20 mU/l was used as a cutoff limit to define GHD and idiopathic short stature (ISS) patients. The results of GH provocative tests were compared to age- and gender-based standard deviation scores (SDS) of plasma IGFBP-2, IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and the molar ratios of the latter two to IGFBP-2. The respective normative range values for these parameters were determined in plasma samples from 353 healthy children (i.e. 171 girls, 182 boys). RESULTS: Circulating IGFBP-2 levels did not correlate with height SDS, height velocity SDS or the peak GH levels after provocative stimuli. A weak negative relationship was found between IGFBP-2 and IGF-I. Plasma levels of IGFBP-2 in GHD patients were higher than those of ISS children, who had normal levels. Although at the optimal cutoff point of -0.71 SDS 91.5% of the GHD patients were identified correctly, a substantial proportion (71.9%) of the ISS subjects also had IGFBP-2 levels above this limit. The use of various combinations of IGFBP-2, IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and the derived ratios only slightly improved the diagnostic efficiency as compared to the results of the individual tests. Neither IGFBP-2 nor the IGFBP-3/IGFBP-2 and IGF-I/IGFBP-2 ratios were found to be related to the short- (1 year) or long-term (3 years) growth response to GH therapy. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that none of the tests investigated, either alone or in various combinations, are reliable in either predicting the peak GH level after provocative stimuli in prepubertal short children or in predicting their growth response to GH.     

Insulin-like growth factors as diagnostic tools in growth hormone deficiency during childhood and adolescence: the KIGS experience

Growth hormone (GH) deficiency in children covers a spectrum of disorders involving an impairment in GH secretion and a clinical syndrome characterized by permanent stunting of growth. Ascertaining impairments in GH secretion directly is complex, especially if GH deficiency (GHD) is isolated and not caused by congenital or acquired pituitary defects or genetic abnormalities. It has been established that the concentrations of GH-dependent peptides, such as insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), are low in patients with GHD. Their levels are, however, also influenced by a multitude of factors, such as age, gender, height, liver function, nutritional status and other hormones. In addition, the type of complex formed, e.g. either binary or ternary, may influence the measurements of IGFs and their binding proteins. Therefore, levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 are generally lower in short children compared with age-matched norms. The reported diagnostic value of sub-normal basal levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 is, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, approximately 70%. Thus, definite proof of GHD can only be achieved by means of GH measurements. As the diagnosis of GHD is somewhat unlikely if IGF testing shows normal values, it is clearly advantageous to schedule these tests as part of the initial diagnostic work-up in short children, as their implementation is not only practical but also inexpensive. The Pfizer International Growth Database (KIGS) analysis of IGF-I (n = 2,750) and IGFBP-3 (n = 1,300) levels in children with idiopathic GHD shows that these two parameters are now firmly embedded in diagnostic strategies around the world.     

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 as diagnostic markers of growth hormone deficiency in infancy

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in infancy is difficult, and no specific cutoff value during GH provocative testing is recommended in early life. METHODS: Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and serum IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) levels were evaluated as diagnostic markers of GHD. Measurements of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 during the 1st year of life were analyzed in 11 patients clinically suspected of having GHD (neonatal hypoglycemia, micropenis, or evidence of other pituitary hormone deficiencies), in whom the diagnosis was later verified. A prospective cohort of 51 healthy infants served as controls. RESULTS: The sensitivity of IGF-I as a diagnostic marker of GHD was 90% (10 out of 11 patients) with a cutoff value of -2 standard deviations (SD), and the sensitivity of IGFBP-3 measurements was 81% (9 out of 11 patients) with a cutoff value below -2 SD. One patient had serial measurements before initiation of GH treatment where the IGF-I was fluctuating (3 of 6 slightly above -2 SD), whereas all IGFBP-3 measurements were below -2 SD. CONCLUSIONS: The IGF-I had a high sensitivity in detecting infants with GHD. The combination of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 increased the diagnostic sensitivity. We speculate that assessment of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 may add diagnostic value in infants suspected of having GHD and furthermore that values below -2 SD are highly suggestive of GHD.     

Diagnostic value of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in growth hormone disorders in adults

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) measurements in adult patients with acromegaly and GH deficiency (GHD). METHODS: Serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were measured in 39 active acromegalic patients, 34 adult patients with GHD and 150 healthy adults. Disease activity in patients with acromegaly was confirmed by nadir GH levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Among patients with acromegaly, 15 had not been treated previously and 24 had been treated but not cured. GHD in adults was diagnosed by an insulin tolerance test (ITT). Among patients with GHD, 15 were aged 20-40 years (9 men and 6 women) and 19 were aged over 40 years (9 men and 10 women). One hundred and fifty healthy subjects were recruited as a control group. To compare the individual serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels of patients with the results of the gold standard, we calculated age- and sex-corrected standard deviation scores (SDS) for individual IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. The sensitivities of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements for the disease diagnosis were analyzed using the mean +/- 2 SD of the values of healthy control subjects as a diagnostic cutoff, defining 95% specificity. RESULTS: The mean IGF-I and IGFBP-3 SDS levels were significantly higher in active acromegalic patients, both untreated and treated but not cured, than in the control subjects (p < 0.05). The sensitivities of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements for the diagnosis of acromegaly were 97.4 and 81.8%, respectively. In untreated patients with acromegaly, the sensitivities of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements for the diagnosis of disease were 100 and 100%, while these were 95.8 and 72.7% in treated patients with acromegaly. In adult patients with GHD, the mean IGF-I and IGFBP-3 SDS were significantly lower than those of the control subjects (IGF-I, -2.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 0.0 +/- 1.0 SDS, p < 0.0001); IGFBP-3, -1.7 +/- 1.2 vs. 0.0 +/- 1.0 SDS, p < 0.0001), but there was a considerable overlap between GHD in adults and the controls. In all patients with GHD, the sensitivities of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements were 64.7 and 52.9%, respectively. In the group of women aged 20-40 years, the sensitivity of IGF-I measurement for the diagnosis of GHD was 100%, although the number of patients was only 6. CONCLUSION: Both serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements are comparable to an oral glucose tolerance test in patients with untreated acromegaly, but in acromegalic patients that have undergone surgery and/or radiotherapy, serum IGF-I is more valuable for determining disease activity than serum IGFBP-3. Serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements are not valuable for the diagnosis of GHD in adults, but in women aged 20-40 years serum IGF-I measurement appears to be useful in the diagnosis of GHD.     

Evaluation of the components of the insulin-like growth factors system in GH-deficient adults: effects of twelve-month rhGH treatment.

The impact of GH deficiency and rhGH replacement therapy on IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and ALS levels has been widely studied. There is less information available on IGF-II levels, the component of the ternary complex poorly dependent on GH. We investigate the components of IGFs system in 36 GHD adults (28M, 8F, age 45 +/- 14 yrs) before and after 12 months of rhGH therapy (mean dose 0.3 +/- 0.1 mg/day). One-hundred healthy sex- and age-matched subjects were studied for comparison. At baseline, GHD patients showed IGF-I and IGF-II levels and IGFs to IGFBP-3 molar ratios that were lower than controls. During therapy, IGF-I levels increased (p < 0.01) to normal range. IGF-II levels, though higher than at baseline (p < 0.01), remained lower than in controls (p < 0.01). ALS and IGFBP-3 significantly increased (p < 0.001). These modifications resulted in normalization in IGF-I to IGFBP-3 ratio, while no change in IGF-II to IGFBP-3 ratio was observed. In conclusion, the increase of serum IGF-II levels during rhGH treatment in GHD patients probably reflects the increase in the other components of ternary complex (ALS and IGFBP-3). However, serum IGF-II levels as well as IGF-II to IGFBP-3 ratio, although increased, were definitely lower than in controls. This last result, given the increasing evidences of a direct implication of IGF-II in cancer, may further confirm the safety of rhGH replacement in adults with severe GHD as diagnosed by appropriate stimulation tests.     

Pharmacological testing of growth hormone secretion

The laboratory confirmation of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) has been extensively studied. Multiple stimuli induce GH release, but insulin-induced hypoglycemia usually is considered the 'gold standard'. Seventy-five to 90% of normal children have significant increments of hGH to any single test. Complete and partial syndromes of GHD have been defined, but some patients with a clinical appearance of GHD release hGH during provocative testing. Discordant results on varied tests may occur in the same child. Sequential and simultaneous tests have been attempted with diverse time patterns; testing sequence may significantly affect data interpretation. Persistent problems with GH provocative tests remain: normal data not strictly defined throughout childhood, multiple tests with discordant results, and substantial discrepancies of immunopotency estimates with different radioimmunoassays. Some children with 'normal' hGH increments during provocative tests, despite clinical GHD, may require short-term treatment with hGH to finally establish the diagnosis.     

Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 levels in pediatric patients with growth hormone deficiency, eating disorders and acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) is altered in different diseases and might be used as an indication of its severity. The aims of our study were to investigate: (1) the developmental pattern of the serum IGFBP-2 concentration at birth and during childhood and adolescence; (2) whether the serum IGFBP-2 level could be a marker for the diagnosis and evolution of diseases where the growth hormone (GH)-IGF axis is altered, and (3) whether this binding protein shows a relationship with IGF-I, its free fraction, IGFBP-1 and -3. We report reference values for 55 normal full-term newborns and 221 normal children who were divided into 5 groups according to their Tanner stage. Serum levels were higher in newborns when compared with Tanner stages I-V (p < 0.001, ANOVA), with no further changes throughout development. Furthermore, we studied IGFBP-2 levels in 24 children with congenital GH deficiency (GHD), 26 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 75 obese children, and 60 girls with anorexia nervosa (AN) at diagnosis and during a follow-up period. IGFBP-2 at diagnosis was increased in GHD, ALL and AN, and decreased in obesity (p < 0.05, ANOVA). During the follow-up, IGFBP-2 concentrations tended to normalize. IGFBP-2 correlated positively with IGFBP-1 and negatively with IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in normal subjects and at diagnosis of the pathologies studied. Although IGFBP-2 functions are not well understood, these results suggest a possible role for this protein in diseases where the GH-IGF axis is altered.     

Plasma levels of total and active ghrelin in acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency

Ghrelin is an endogenous growth hormone (GH) secretagogue recently isolated from the stomach. Although it possesses a strong GH releasing activity in vitro and in vivo, its physiological significance in endogenous GH secretion remains unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize plasma ghrelin levels in acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD). We investigated plasma total and active ghrelin in 21 patients with acromegaly, 9 patients with GHD and 24 age-, sex- and BMI-matched controls. In all subjects, we further assessed the concentrations of leptin, soluble leptin receptor, insulin, IGF-I, free IGF-I and IGFBP-1, 2, 3 and 6. Patients with acromegaly and GHD as well as control subjects showed similar levels of total ghrelin (controls 2.004+/-0.18 ng/ml, acromegalics 1.755+/-0.16 ng/ml, p=0.31, GHD patients 1.704+/-0.17 ng/ml, p=0.35) and active ghrelin (controls 0.057+/-0.01 ng/ml, acromegalics 0.047+/-0.01 ng/ml, p=0.29, GHD patients 0.062+/-0.01 ng/ml, p=0.73). In acromegalic patients plasma total ghrelin values correlated negatively with IGF-I (p<0.05), in GHD patients active ghrelin correlated with IGF-I positively (p<0.05). In the control group, total ghrelin correlated positively with IGFBP-2 (p<0.05) and negatively with active ghrelin (p=0.05), BMI (p<0.05), WHR (p<0.05), insulin (p=0.01) and IGF-I (p=0.05). Plasma active ghrelin correlated positively with IGFBP-3 (p=0.005) but negatively with total ghrelin and free IGF-I (p=0.01). In conclusion, all groups of the tested subjects showed similar plasma levels of total and active ghrelin. In acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency plasma ghrelin does not seem to be significantly affected by changes in GH secretion.     

European audit of current practice in diagnosis and treatment of childhood growth hormone deficiency

BACKGROUND: The present survey among members of the ESPE on current practice in diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is of great clinical relevance and importance in the light of the recently published guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of GHD by the Growth Hormone Research Society. We have found much conformity but also numerous discrepancies between the recommendations of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the current practice in Europe. RESULTS: We found that 80% of the pediatric endocrinologists included insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in their initial evaluation of a short child suspected of having GHD, whereas only 22% used GH provocative testing alone in the initial evaluation of a short child. Sixty-eight percent confirmed the diagnosis of GHD using two separate provocative tests. In the present survey cutoff values for GH provocative testing clustered around two values; 10 ng/ml and 20 mU/l. Interestingly, these two values, differing by a factor of 2, were also the most prevalent cutoff values among those who reported their assay to be calibrated against the WHO International Reference Preparation 80/505 where the conversion factor between milligrams and milliunits is 2.6. This suggests that the selection of cutoff values is based on tradition rather than on specific GH assay characteristics. In addition, only 63% of the respondents actually knew what GH assay they were using, and only 57% knew how their GH assay was calibrated. Dosing of GH at the start of treatment was reported according to body surface by 39%, whereas 59% were dosing according to body weight. GH dose adjustment was primarily based on growth response and height during auxological assessment every 3-4 months (height velocity, change in height velocity or change in height standard deviation scores) as indicated by almost 70% of the respondents. However, dose adjustment according to body surface (38%) and body weight (44%) was also quite common. Sixty-five percent measures IGF-I regularly (at least once a year) during GH therapy in children, and to our surprise 17% reported that they adjust the GH dose according to the IGF-I levels. SUMMARY: In summary, we have found large heterogeneity in the current practice of diagnosis and treatment of childhood GHD among European pediatric endocrinologists. Especially standardizations of GH assays and cutoff values are urgently required to ensure a uniform and correct diagnosis and therapy of GHD in the future.     

Usefulness and limitation of measurement of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) for diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency.

To analyze the utility of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) radioimmunoassay for diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) we measured IGFBP-3 in sera from normal children, short children and patients with GHD. The sensitivity (true positive ratio) of IGFBP-3 for complete GHD (cGHD) was 93%, while the specificity (true negative ratio) for normal short children (NS) was 88%. In contrast, the sensitivity of IGFBP-3 for partial GHD (pGHD) was only 43%. The poor discrimination between patients with pGHD and NS may be the result of their relatively similar GH level, as compared to cGHD, or due to the limitations of GH stimulation tests. The specificity of IGFBP-3 for NS was excellent in children of all ages: less than 10 years old (87%) and older than 10 (88%). However, sensitivity for GHD was good for children less than 10 years old (84%) but poor for children older than 10 (64%). IGFBP-3 may be less sensitive for diagnosing GHD in older children because IGFBP-3 levels may also increase during puberty due to mechanisms independent of the GH-IGF-I axis.     

Relevance of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-2 measurements during GH treatment of GH-deficient and non-GH-deficient children and adolescents

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the relevance of parameters representing the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system with regard to growth hormone (GH) treatment during childhood. In adults, high IGF-I levels were found to be associated with side effects and long-term risks. AIM/METHOD: Our aim was to monitor the serum levels of IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) 3, and IGFBP-2 during long-term GH treatment of 156 patients with GH deficiency (GHD) and of 153 non-GHD patients. We determined the extent to which the IGF parameters exceed the normal ranges and identified those parameters which are predictive of 1st-year growth. RESULTS: In prepubertal GHD children, the levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 exceeded the 95th centile of the reference values for this age group in 2.3, 0.3, and 7.9% of the cases, respectively, whereas in prepubertal non-GHD children, the same parameters exceeded the 95th reference centile in 20.1, 3.5, and 32.2%, respectively. In pubertal GHD children IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 levels exceeded the 95th reference centile in 11.1, 1.5, and 15.4%, respectively. In pubertal non-GHD children, these levels also exceeded the 95th centile in 26.7, 7.0, and 41.4%, respectively. In both GHD and non-GHD groups, however, some patients had IGF parameters which were below the reference values. Our analysis showed that, in both groups, in addition to maximum GH, all IGF parameters (IGF-I, IGFBP-3, IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio, IGFBP-2 or derivatives) significantly extend the scope of a calculated model for predicting 1st-year height velocity. CONCLUSION: For reasons of safety and optimization of GH therapy, it is essential to follow up IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-2 levels regularly during childhood.     

IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 levels during initial GH dosage step-up are indicators of GH sensitivity in GH-deficient children and short children born small for gestational age

BACKGROUND: A stepwise increment of the GH dose is an approach aimed at avoiding adverse events. We investigated GH sensitivity by studying IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations during the initial phase of GH treatment. METHODS: Our investigation was part of the regular follow-up of prepubertal children with GH deficiency (GHD) (n = 31) and small for gestational age (SGA) (n = 23). Dosage was increased in three steps: one-third at the start, two-thirds after 14 days, and the full dose after 28 days (full dose: GHD = 28 microg/kg body weight (BW)/day; SGA = 60 microg/kg BW/day). Blood samples were taken on days 0, 14 and 28, as well as in conjunction with anthropometrical examinations after 3, 6 and 12 months. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured by means of published in-house RIAs and age-related references were used to calculate standard deviation scores (SDS). Height velocity (cm/year) and Delta HT SDS were taken as growth response parameters. RESULTS: Before GH treatment (GHD vs. SGA; median and p values): age (years) (6.6 vs. 6.0; n.s.), HT SDS (-2.6 vs. -3.2; p < 0.05); GH amount after stepping up (mug/kg BW/day) (28 vs. 60; p < 0.01); BW SDS (-0.5 vs. -2.9; p < 0.01); max. GH stimulated (microg/l) (5.6 vs. 10.8; p < 0.01); IGF-I SDS (-3.5 vs. -1.8; p < 0.01); IGFBP-3 SDS (-2.0 vs. 0.8; p < 0.01). After 1 year of GH therapy: HT velocity (cm/year) (9.8 vs. 9.6; n.s.), Delta HT SDS (0.9 vs. 0.9; n.s.); WT velocity (kg/year) (3.3 vs. 3.5; n.s.). Our results show that changes in growth similar to GHD could be induced in SGA by a dosage that was twice as high as the replacement dose given in GHD. GH dose and HT velocity did not correlate in both groups. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 increased as follows in GHD and SGA during stepping up of the dosage (ng/ml, GHD vs. SGA): at start, 54 vs. 89; at day 14, 78 vs. 132; at day 28, 90 vs. 167; at 3 months, 118 vs. 218. There was the same relationship between dose levels and absolute IGF-I concentrations in both groups. In terms of IGF-I SDS, the dose-response curve in SGA showed a shift to the right in comparison to GHD, thus indicating lower sensitivity to GH. The dynamics of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 differed, as IGFBP-3 peaked earlier (on day 28). In GHD, IGF-I SDS at 3 months was -0.7 vs. +0.9 in SGA. Near-identical levels were found for Delta IGF-I SDS and IGFBP-3 SDS above basal levels for each time-point investigated. First year HT velocity in GHD correlated negatively with basal IGF-I SDS (R(2) = 0.33; p <0.001) and basal IGFBP-3 (R(2) = 0.17; p <0.05) but did not correlate with the IGF-I increment during the 0- to 3-month period. Conversely, first year HT velocity correlated (+) in SGA with the IGF SDS increment during the 0- to 3-month period (R(2) = 0.26; p = <0.05). Height velocity in SGA, however, correlated neither with basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 nor with the 0- to 3-month increments of IGFBP-3 SDS. CONCLUSIONS: IGFs increase during initial GH therapy, thus raising questions about short-term IGF generation tests. (I) In terms of IGF generation, substantially lower sensitivity to GH was observable in SGA. (II) Higher GH sensitivity during first year catch-up growth is associated with GHD, but in SGA it is attributable to increases in IGF. A wider range of GH dosages needs to be explored in order to gain further insight into the relationship between GH dose, IGF levels, and growth. Monitoring IGFs is a practical means for exploring GH sensitivity during dosage stepping up.     

Determination of insulin-like growth factor-I in the monitoring of growth hormone treatment with respect to efficacy of treatment and side effects: should potential risks of cardiovascular disease and cancer be considered?

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I has proven to be important in the diagnosis of childhood-onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD). However, the variability of IGF-I should be taken into account before it can be used in a clinical setting. GH replacement therapy in GHD patients increases IGF-I into the normal range, although there is a large variation. Excessively high (supranormal) GH-induced IGF-I levels are associated with increased prevalence of side effects in adults with GHD. Consequently, at most centres, GH doses are titrated according to IGF-I levels in GHD adults. Whether or not this should also be done in children has not been established. Due to the known variability of IGF-I, individual changes in IGF-I must exceed approximately 35% to be sufficiently significant to warrant a dose adjustment. Novel epidemiological studies have suggested that higher IGF-I levels are associated with an increased risk of prostate, breast and colorectal cancer compared with lower IGF-I levels in otherwise healthy subjects. Consequently, life-time exposure to IGF-I should be considered in all patients treated with GH, and IGF-I should preferably be kept within normal age-related ranges in children as well as in adults.     

Partial growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children has more similarities to idiopathic short stature than to severe GHD

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of growth hormone (GH) secretion is based on stimulation tests. Low GH peaks in stimulation tests, together with decreased insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) secretion, confirm a diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD). However, limitations in interpreting the test results and discrepancies between GH and IGF-I secretion in particular patients have both been reported. GH therapy should improve the prognosis of adult height (PAH). The aim of the study was to compare the deficit of height at diagnosis, IGF-I secretion and PAH in children with either decreased (in varying degrees of severity) or normal GH secretion in stimulation tests. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis comprised 540 short children (373 boys, 167 girls), aged 11.7 +/- 3.2 years. In all the patients two GH stimulation tests were performed, IGF-I serum concentration was measured, bone age was assessed and PAH was calculated. According to the GH peak in the two stimulation tests, the patients were classified into the following groups: severe GHD (sGHD)--GH peak < 5 ng/mL (n = 44), partial GHD (pGHD)--GH peak 5-10 ng/mL (n = 190), idiopathic short stature (ISS)--GH peak at least 10 ng/mL (n = 306). RESULTS: A significantly greater deficit of height, lower IGF-I secretion and worse PAH were observed in sGHD than in both remaining groups, while all the differences between pGHD and ISS in the parameters analysed were insignificant. CONCLUSION: The results obtained indicate the necessity of applying another methods of qualifying short children for GH therapy other than GH stimulation tests with a cut-off value at a level of 10 ng/mL.     

Reproducibility in patterns of IGF generation with special reference to idiopathic short stature

BACKGROUND/AIM: Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) generation tests are both sensitive and specific measures of growth hormone (GH) sensitivity. Recently, the question of reproducibility of IGF generation tests has been raised. We report our analysis of the correlation of low- and high-dose GH IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation tests among patients with GH deficiency, GH insensitivity, and idiopathic short stature. METHODS: A total of 198 subjects were randomized to either high- or low-dose GH for 7 days; the alternate dose was received after a 2-week washout period. Samples were collected at baseline and on days 5 and 8 of GH administration. RESULTS: The serum concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 correlated significantly from one test to the other, regardless of the diagnosis. In normal subjects and patients with GH insensitivity and GH deficiency, the delta over baseline in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in the low-dose test was highly predictive of the delta values in the high-dose test. The delta correlation was greatly diminished, however, in the patient population having idiopathic short stature. CONCLUSIONS: These observations support partial GH insensitivity effecting IGF-I generation specifically, as a possible etiology for idiopathic short stature, and thus such patients may warrant appropriate biochemical and/or molecular evaluation for partial GH insensitivity.     

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II in growth hormone deficiency

In blood, circulating IGFs are bound to six high-affinity IGFBPs, which modulate IGF delivery to target cells. Serum IGFs and IGFBP-3, the main carrier of IGFs, are upregulated by GH. The functional role of serum IGFBP-3-bound IGFs is not well understood, but they constitute the main reservoir of IGFs in the circulation. We have used an equation derived from the law of mass action to estimate serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II, as well as serum free IGF-I and free IGF-II, in 129 control children and adolescents (48 girls and 81 boys) and in 13 patients with GHD. Levels of serum total IGF-I, total IGF-II, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3 were determined experimentally, while those of IGFBP-4, IGFBP-5 and IGFPB-6, as well as the 12 affinity constants of association of the two IGFs with the six IGFBPs, were taken from published values. A correction for in vivo proteolysis of serum IGFBP-3 was also considered. In controls, serum total IGF-I, total IGF-II, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I, IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II and free IGF-I increased linearly with age, from less than 1 to 15 years, in the two sexes. The concentrations of serum free IGF-I and free IGF-II were approximately two orders of magnitude below published values, as well as below the affinity constant of association of IGF-I with the type-1 IGF receptor. Therefore, it is unlikely that these levels can interact with the receptor. In the 13 patients with GHD, mean (+/- SD) SDS of serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I was -2.89 +/- 0.97. It was significantly lower than serum total IGF-I, free IGF-I or IGFBP-3 SDSs (-2.35 +/- 0.83, -1.12 +/- 0.78 and -2.55 +/- 1.07, respectively, p = 0.0001). The mean SDS of serum total IGF-II, IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II and free IGF-II were -1.25 +/- 0.68, -2.03 +/- 0.87 and 0.59 +/- 1.10, respectively, in GHD. In control subjects, 89.8 +/- 4.47% of serum total IGF-I and 77.3 +/- 9.4% of serum total IGF-II were bound to serum IGFBP-3. In patients with GHD, the mean serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II were 8.63 +/- 8. 53 and 19.1 +/- 14.7% below the respective means of control subjects (p < 0.02). In conclusion, in GHD there was a relative change in the distribution of serum IGFs among IGFBPs, due to the combined effects of the decrease in both total IGF-I and IGFBP-3. As a result, serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3 bound IGF-II, the main reservoirs of serum IGFs, were severely affected. This suggests that the decrease in serum IGFPB-3-bound IGF-I and IGFBP-3-bound IGF-II might have a negative effect for growth promotion and other biological effects of IGF-I and IGF-II. Finally, the estimation of serum IGFBP-3-bound IGF-I, or the percentage of total IGF-I and IGF-II bound to IGFBP-3, might be useful markers in the diagnosis of GHD.     

Assessing short-statured children for growth hormone deficiency

AIM: To optimize the workup of short-statured children by defining the most appropriate tools for diagnosing growth hormone (GH) deficiency. METHODS: Patients were assigned to prepubertal (n = 113) or pubertal (n = 112, including 25 boys primed with testosterone) age groups. Mean plasma GH concentration during sleep, GH peak after provocative test, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) were measured in a single evaluation. RESULTS: The mean GH concentration during sleep was more often normal (n = 155) than the GH peak after provocative tests (n = 105) or the IGF-I concentration (n = 88). Prepubertal patients with a normal body mass index (BMI) had mean GH concentrations during sleep that correlated positively with height, growth rate, GH peak after provocative tests, and IGF-I (p < 0.0005 for all) and negatively with the difference between target and patient heights (p = 0.01) and BMI (p < 0.05). Pubertal patients with a normal BMI had a mean GH concentration during sleep that correlated positively with GH after provocative tests (p < 0.0001) and IGF-I (p < 0.005). Mean GH concentration during sleep and IGF-I concentration for boys primed with testosterone were more often normal (n = 23) than the GH peak after provocative tests (n = 14). All 9 patients with pituitary stalk interruption had low IGF-I concentrations; 1 patient had a normal GH peak after provocative test, and 2 patients had normal mean GH concentrations during sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the GH concentration during sleep and priming boys with pubertal delay can help to exclude idiopathic GH deficiency. Magnetic resonance imaging is needed to exclude anatomic abnormalities when GH and/or IGF-I concentrations are low.     

Defining growth hormone status in adults with hypopituitarism

The identification of adults with severe growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is not straightforward. The insulin tolerance test remains the gold standard diagnostic test, although other stimuli such as GH-releasing hormone-arginine are gaining acceptance. Insulin-like growth factor-I has a poor diagnostic sensitivity in adult-onset GHD, but is more useful in the subgroup of adults with childhood-onset GHD. Therapeutic developments include increasing recognition of the need to continue GH therapy beyond final height in young adults with severe GHD on retesting. Consensus guidelines have provided a useful algorithm to identify individuals requiring retesting and the number of tests needed. The concept of partial GHD, recognized by paediatric endocrinologists for many years, is being examined in adults with hypothalamic-pituitary disease. Preliminary evidence suggests that this entity is associated with metabolic and anthropometric abnormalities intermediate between those in severe GHD and in healthy controls. It remains to be seen whether this subgroup will derive benefit from GH therapy. To date, therapeutic benefits of GH have been demonstrated only in adults with severe GHD. It is, therefore, imperative that these individuals are unequivocally identified; the diagnosis becomes more uncertain in the presence of obesity, increasing age, and in the absence of additional pituitary hormone deficits.     

Individual igf-I responsiveness to a fixed regimen of low-dose growth hormone replacement is increased with less variability in obese compared to non-obese adults with severe growth hormone deficiency

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Decreased GH and IGF-I levels and increased GH responsiveness are frequently reported in obesity. As GH-deficient adults are commonly obese, the role of obesity in affecting hepatic responsiveness of IGF-I generation to GH stimulation is unclear in severe GH-deficient states. To address this question, we challenged a cohort of severely GH-deficient non-obese and obese adults with a fixed low GH dose (0.2 mg/day), and examined the relationship of body mass index (BMI) with IGF-I response. METHODS: 12 non-obese (6 males, median BMI 24.7 kg/m2) and 14 obese (7 males, median BMI 45.2 kg/m2) adults with severe GH deficiency were studied for 8 weeks. Blood samples were collected at baseline, and weeks 4 and 8. RESULTS: There was a larger increment and reduced variability of IGF-I levels in obese compared to non-obese GH-deficient adults at week 8, but not at week 4. A similar but smaller increment and less variability was observed with IGFBP-3. Increment IGF-I positively correlated with baseline BMI at weeks 4 (r=0.49, p<0.02) and 8 (r=0.47, p<0.02). No gender differences were observed with the IGF-I and IGFBP-3 response. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there is a larger increment and deceased individual variability of IGF-I to the low GH replacement dose in obese compared to non-obese adults with severe GH deficiency, regardless of gender. The positive association of IGF-I increment with BMI implies a greater impact of obesity rather than GH deficiency in enhancing hepatic sensitivity to GH. These findings, thus, question the reliability of interpreting single serum IGF-I levels in non-obese adults with severe GH deficiency treated with low GH replacement doses.     

Normal growth spurt and final height despite low levels of all forms of circulating insulin-like growth factor-I in a patient with acid-labile subunit deficiency

BACKGROUND: In a recently described patient with acid-labile subunit (ALS) deficiency, the inability to form ternary complexes resulted in a marked reduction in circulating total insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, whereas skeletal growth was only marginally affected. To further study the role of circulating versus locally produced IGF-I in skeletal growth in this patient, we now describe in detail growth changes and their relationship with several components of the circulating IGF system. DESIGN AND METHODS: We followed growth and development up to the final height in a patient with complete ALS deficiency and determined both spontaneous and growth hormone (GH)-stimulated changes in the IGF system, including measurements of total, free and bioactive IGF-I, total IGF-II and insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-1, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3. RESULTS: The patient had a delayed growth and pubertal onset. Six months of GH treatment had no effect on growth. At the age of 19.3 years, he spontaneously completed puberty and had a normal growth spurt for a late adolescent (peak height velocity of 8.4 cm/year). A normal final height was attained at 21.3 years (167.5 cm; -0.78 SDS). During as well as after puberty, basal levels of total, free and bioactive IGF-I were low, as were total IGF-II, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3. GH treatment for 6 months normalized free IGF-I and increased bioactive IGF-I, but had no effect on growth velocity. CONCLUSIONS: This case story shows that in the presence of complete ALS deficiency, a height within normal limits can be obtained despite low levels of all forms of circulating IGF-I. Furthermore, the patient presented a delayed but normal growth spurt without any marked increment of circulating IGF-I.