The challenges of reliance on insulin-like growth factor I in monitoring disease activity in patients with acromegaly

Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is an important marker of disease activity in patients with acromegaly, and epidemiological data indicate control of circulating IGF-I in patients with acromegaly restores life expectancy to normal. Improvements in the quality of, and access to, IGF-I assays has encouraged monitoring of acromegaly with IGF-I, although circulating growth hormone (GH) and IGF-I values provide different information, so ideally both should be monitored. However, the introduction of the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant poses new challenges. Pegvisomant binds with high affinity to GH receptors, thereby blocking the action of GH at the tissue level and rendering the hormone biologically inactive. This leaves IGF-I as the principal marker of disease activity. It is conceptually possible to induce a state of functional GH deficiency (GHD) with pegvisomant with IGF-I values within the normal range. With the goal of minimizing the risk of over-treatment and GHD, we have provided preliminary guidance on the target range for IGF-I in patients receiving pegvisomant based on the gender- and decade-based percentile ranges for IGF-I of adult patients with untreated GHD enrolled in the Pfizer International Metabolic Database (KIMS).     

Plasma levels of total and active ghrelin in acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency

Ghrelin is an endogenous growth hormone (GH) secretagogue recently isolated from the stomach. Although it possesses a strong GH releasing activity in vitro and in vivo, its physiological significance in endogenous GH secretion remains unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize plasma ghrelin levels in acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD). We investigated plasma total and active ghrelin in 21 patients with acromegaly, 9 patients with GHD and 24 age-, sex- and BMI-matched controls. In all subjects, we further assessed the concentrations of leptin, soluble leptin receptor, insulin, IGF-I, free IGF-I and IGFBP-1, 2, 3 and 6. Patients with acromegaly and GHD as well as control subjects showed similar levels of total ghrelin (controls 2.004+/-0.18 ng/ml, acromegalics 1.755+/-0.16 ng/ml, p=0.31, GHD patients 1.704+/-0.17 ng/ml, p=0.35) and active ghrelin (controls 0.057+/-0.01 ng/ml, acromegalics 0.047+/-0.01 ng/ml, p=0.29, GHD patients 0.062+/-0.01 ng/ml, p=0.73). In acromegalic patients plasma total ghrelin values correlated negatively with IGF-I (p<0.05), in GHD patients active ghrelin correlated with IGF-I positively (p<0.05). In the control group, total ghrelin correlated positively with IGFBP-2 (p<0.05) and negatively with active ghrelin (p=0.05), BMI (p<0.05), WHR (p<0.05), insulin (p=0.01) and IGF-I (p=0.05). Plasma active ghrelin correlated positively with IGFBP-3 (p=0.005) but negatively with total ghrelin and free IGF-I (p=0.01). In conclusion, all groups of the tested subjects showed similar plasma levels of total and active ghrelin. In acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency plasma ghrelin does not seem to be significantly affected by changes in GH secretion.     

Plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with acromegaly.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is known to be linked to retinal ischemia-associated neovascularization. It was recently found that insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) enhances VEGF gene expression. In this study we investigated whether plasma VEGF levels are increased in patients with acromegaly, a disease in which plasma IGF-I levels are elevated, and whether plasma VEGF levels are correlated with plasma IGF-I levels in these patients. We retrospectively analyzed plasma samples from 13 active acromegalic patients (7 males and 6 females) aged 33 to 66 years, with a mean age of 52.3+/-10.8 years. The results were compared with plasma VEGF levels in 16 age- and sex-matched, healthy subjects (9 males and 7 females) aged 22 to 66 years, with a mean age of 52.4+/-11.5 years. Plasma VEGF levels were not higher in the acromegalic patients than in the healthy subjects (253+/-61 vs. 197+/-30 pg/mL, P= 0.39). In 5 patients plasma VEGF levels were rather slightly increased after pituitary adenomectomy while one patient showed a reduced plasma VEGF level. In addition there was no correlation between plasma VEGF and GH or IGF-I levels. These data indicate that plasma VEGF levels are not increased in patients with acromegaly and that serum VEGF may play a less important role in the neovascularization in the carcinogenesis and/or disturbances of the cardiovascular system in patients with acromegaly.     

Insulin-like growth factor I levels in healthy adults

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels mainly reflect secretion of growth hormone (GH) in the body. The aims of this study were to compare different IGF-I assay methods in healthy individuals, test the reliability of the methods and discuss the utility of IGF-I measurement in adults. The Nichols Institute Diagnostics radioimmunoassay was used to evaluate IGF-I in two random population samples of men and women (aged 25-64 years, n = 392) taken 10 years apart, in 1985 and 1995. This method for IGF-I testing was also compared with an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) method in 387 men and women participating in the World Health Organization MONICA (MONItoring of trends and determinants for CArdiovascular diseases) Project, Goteborg, Sweden, in 1995. Serum IGF-I decreased with increasing age in both men and women. IGF-I was higher in young women compared with young men in both cohorts, while the opposite was found in the highest age group. Age-adjusted significant correlations were found between IGF-I and smoking, fibrinogen, coffee consumption, lipoprotein (a), osteocalcin and IGF-binding protein 3. The two cohorts showed similar mean IGF-I concentrations irrespective of method. The correlation between the Nichols and the IRMA methods was high: r = 0.93 (p < 0.0001). Based on this and previous studies, population-based IGF-I measurements are robust irrespective of which commercially available method of assay is used. IGF-I levels can be used in diagnosing acromegaly as well as providing target values. IGF-I assay can be used as a complement to stimulation testing in the diagnosis of GH deficiency, and as a tool for GH dose titration.     

IGFs and human cancer: implications regarding the risk of growth hormone therapy

Perturbations of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis, including the autocrine production of IGFs, IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) and IGFBP proteases such as prostate specific antigen (PSA), and cathepsin D have been identified in prostate, lung and breast cancer cells and tissues. Serum IGFBP-3 levels have been found to be negatively correlated to the risk of cancer. Interestingly, IGFBP-3 is a potent inhibitor of IGF action and also mediates apoptosis via an IGF-independent mechanism. Recent case-control studies have found an approximately 10% increase in the serum levels of IGF-I in patients with prostate, breast and lung cancers, which are among the most frequently diagnosed cancers. While the studies indicate an association between serum IGF-I levels and cancer risk, causality has not been established. Thus, serum IGF-I level may actually be a confounding variable, serving as a marker for autocrine tissue IGF-I production. Growth hormone (GH) therapy raises both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in serum. However, the role of GH in controlling prostate, breast and lung growth and carcinogenesis remains unclear from animal studies. Increased GH levels as seen in acromegaly have been associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia but not with prostate, breast or lung cancers, although colon cancer mortality may be increased. Should serum IGF-I levels be proven to play a causal role in the pathogenesis of cancer, interpreting the risk associated with therapies such as GH replacement must take into account both the duration of exposure and the risk magnitude associated with the degree of serum IGF-I elevation. Since GH-deficient patients often have a subnormal IGF-I serum level, which normalizes on therapy, their cancer risk on GH therapy probably does not increase substantially above that of the normal population. Until further research in the area dictates otherwise, ongoing surveillance and routine monitoring of IGF-I levels in GH recipients should become standard of care.     

Surgical Reintervention in Acromegaly: is it Still worth trying?

Background and ObjectiveThere has not been a formal evaluation of how frequently and to what extent surgical reintervention in patients with persistently active acromegaly may achieve significant, albeit incomplete, reductions in growth hormone (GH) and insulinlike growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. Of importance, recent studies suggest that the response to radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy is better with lower degrees of hypersomatotropism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of surgical reintervention in patients with active acromegaly at our institution between 1995 and 2005.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the outcome in 53 patients with active acromegaly (49 with macroadenomas) who underwent a second operation a mean of 24.1 ± 25.2 months after the first intervention. Basal and postglucose GH as well as IGF-I levels were analyzed at diagnosis and after the first and second pituitary procedures.ResultsBasal GH decreased in 38 patients (72%): to < 10 ng/mL in 17 and to < 2.5 ng/mL in 11. The mean IGF- I index and basal GH decreased significantly after surgical reintervention: 1.7 ± 0.4 to 1.4 ± 0.4 (P = .0001) and 13.0 ± 12.8 to 8.3 ± 11.3 ng/mL (P = .0001), respectively. Some decrement in IGF-I was observed after surgical reintervention in 30 patients (57%), being greater than 30% in 9 (17%). Only 5 patients (9%) achieved complete biochemical cure (normal IGF-I and a postglucose GH level of < 1 ng/mL). Reoperation achieved a significant decline in basal and postglucose GH levels as well as in IGF-I index only in patients with noninvasive macroadenomas.ConclusionPituitary surgical reintervention in patients with acromegaly results in a low percentage of biochemical cure. If a remnant of a noninvasive macroadenoma is visible and accessible, however, such a procedure may significantly reduce GH and IGF-I levels. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:431-437)     

Association of IGF-I and the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio with plasma aldosterone levels in the general population

Several studies in patients with acromegaly or growth hormone (GH) deficiency suggest a stimulatory effect of the growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). We analyzed the association of serum IGF-I with plasma aldosterone and the aldosterone-to-renin ratio in a large sample from the general population. In addition to serum IGF-I levels, we also considered the IGF-I-to-IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 ratio. A total of 1 504 men and 1 566 women aged 25-88 were selected from the first follow-up of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania. Plasma aldosterone and renin concentrations, as well as serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were determined with immunoassays. Analyses of variance and linear regression analyses were performed. We found positive associations between serum IGF-I or the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio with plasma aldosterone in women but not in men. Plasma aldosterone levels increased by 2.91 ng/l per IGF-I standard deviation (SD) and by 2.17 ng/l per IGF-I/IGFBP-3 SD. The associations remained significant after exclusion of subjects taking RAAS-altering medication and of subjects with serum IGF-I levels and aldosterone-to-renin ratios outside the reference range. We conclude that, serum IGF-I and the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio are associated with plasma aldosterone levels in women but not in men from the general population.     

Diagnostic value of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in growth hormone disorders in adults

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) measurements in adult patients with acromegaly and GH deficiency (GHD). METHODS: Serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were measured in 39 active acromegalic patients, 34 adult patients with GHD and 150 healthy adults. Disease activity in patients with acromegaly was confirmed by nadir GH levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Among patients with acromegaly, 15 had not been treated previously and 24 had been treated but not cured. GHD in adults was diagnosed by an insulin tolerance test (ITT). Among patients with GHD, 15 were aged 20-40 years (9 men and 6 women) and 19 were aged over 40 years (9 men and 10 women). One hundred and fifty healthy subjects were recruited as a control group. To compare the individual serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels of patients with the results of the gold standard, we calculated age- and sex-corrected standard deviation scores (SDS) for individual IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. The sensitivities of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements for the disease diagnosis were analyzed using the mean +/- 2 SD of the values of healthy control subjects as a diagnostic cutoff, defining 95% specificity. RESULTS: The mean IGF-I and IGFBP-3 SDS levels were significantly higher in active acromegalic patients, both untreated and treated but not cured, than in the control subjects (p < 0.05). The sensitivities of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements for the diagnosis of acromegaly were 97.4 and 81.8%, respectively. In untreated patients with acromegaly, the sensitivities of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements for the diagnosis of disease were 100 and 100%, while these were 95.8 and 72.7% in treated patients with acromegaly. In adult patients with GHD, the mean IGF-I and IGFBP-3 SDS were significantly lower than those of the control subjects (IGF-I, -2.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 0.0 +/- 1.0 SDS, p < 0.0001); IGFBP-3, -1.7 +/- 1.2 vs. 0.0 +/- 1.0 SDS, p < 0.0001), but there was a considerable overlap between GHD in adults and the controls. In all patients with GHD, the sensitivities of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements were 64.7 and 52.9%, respectively. In the group of women aged 20-40 years, the sensitivity of IGF-I measurement for the diagnosis of GHD was 100%, although the number of patients was only 6. CONCLUSION: Both serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements are comparable to an oral glucose tolerance test in patients with untreated acromegaly, but in acromegalic patients that have undergone surgery and/or radiotherapy, serum IGF-I is more valuable for determining disease activity than serum IGFBP-3. Serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements are not valuable for the diagnosis of GHD in adults, but in women aged 20-40 years serum IGF-I measurement appears to be useful in the diagnosis of GHD.     

A Single-Center Open-Label Study To Investigate The Efficacy And Safety Of Repeated Subcutaneous Injections Of Lanreotide Autogel In Patients With Acromegaly Previously Treated With Octreotide

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of lanreotide Autogel, a depot preparation of a long-acting somatostatin analogue, in patients with acromegaly who were previously treated with octreotide.MethodsIn a prospective single-center, open-label, comparative study, 13 patients were switched from octreotide treatment (baseline) to lanreotide Autogel therapy at a fixed dosage of 90 mg/4 wk. After 6 injections, the dosage was titrated to 60, 90, or 120 mg/4 wk, on the basis of growth hormone (GH) levels, for a further 6 injections. Mean GH and insulinlike growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels were determined at baseline, during treatment (to 48 weeks), and up to 8 weeks after the last injection.ResultsThere was no significant change in the proportion of patients with GH and IGF-I control from baseline to week 48 (GH, 85% to 89%; IGF-I, 46% to 62%). Mean GH levels changed little from baseline, but mean IGF-I levels were significantly lower after 32 weeks (P < .05) and 48 weeks (P < .02). Data collected at 6 and 8 weeks after the last injection suggested that the efficacy of lanreotide Autogel can persist for longer than 4 weeks.ConclusionThis small study suggests that lanreotide Autogel is at least as effective as octreotide in the control of acromegaly and may last for longer than the recommended 4 weeks. It appears to be a useful alternative to long-acting octreotide in the treatment of acromegaly. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:191-197)     

Neurocognitive Function in Acromegaly after Surgical Resection of GH-Secreting Adenoma versus Na?ve Acromegaly

Patients with active untreated acromegaly show mild to moderate neurocognitive disorders that are associated to chronic exposure to growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) hypersecretion. However, it is unknown whether these disorders improve after controlling GH/IGF-I hypersecretion. The aim of this study was to compare neurocognitive functions of patients who successfully underwent GH-secreting adenoma transsphenoidal surgery (cured patients) with patients with naive acromegaly. In addition, we wanted to determine the impact of different clinical and biochemical variables on neurocognitive status in patients with active disease and after long-term cure. A battery of six standardized neuropsychological tests assessed attention, memory and executive functioning. In addition, a quantitative electroencephalography with Low-Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) solution was performed to obtain information about the neurophysiological state of the patients. Neurocognitive data was compared to that of a healthy control group. Multiple linear regression analysis was also conducted using clinical and hormonal parameters to obtain a set of independent predictors of neurocognitive state before and after cure. Both groups of patients scored significantly poorer than the healthy controls on memory tests, especially those assessing visual and verbal recall. Patients with cured acromegaly did not obtain better cognitive measures than naïve patients. Furthermore memory deficits were associated with decreased beta activity in left medial temporal cortex in both groups of patients. Regression analysis showed longer duration of untreated acromegaly was associated with more severe neurocognitive complications, regardless of the diagnostic group, whereas GH levels at the time of assessment was related to neurocognitive outcome only in naïve patients. Longer duration of post-operative biochemical remission of acromegaly was associated with better neurocognitive state. Overall, this data suggests that the effects of chronic exposure to GH/IGF-I hypersecretion could have long-term effects on brain functions.     

Determination of insulin-like growth factor-I in the monitoring of growth hormone treatment with respect to efficacy of treatment and side effects: should potential risks of cardiovascular disease and cancer be considered?

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I has proven to be important in the diagnosis of childhood-onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD). However, the variability of IGF-I should be taken into account before it can be used in a clinical setting. GH replacement therapy in GHD patients increases IGF-I into the normal range, although there is a large variation. Excessively high (supranormal) GH-induced IGF-I levels are associated with increased prevalence of side effects in adults with GHD. Consequently, at most centres, GH doses are titrated according to IGF-I levels in GHD adults. Whether or not this should also be done in children has not been established. Due to the known variability of IGF-I, individual changes in IGF-I must exceed approximately 35% to be sufficiently significant to warrant a dose adjustment. Novel epidemiological studies have suggested that higher IGF-I levels are associated with an increased risk of prostate, breast and colorectal cancer compared with lower IGF-I levels in otherwise healthy subjects. Consequently, life-time exposure to IGF-I should be considered in all patients treated with GH, and IGF-I should preferably be kept within normal age-related ranges in children as well as in adults.     

The role of insulin-like growth factor-I in neuroendocrine function and the consequent effects on sexual maturation: inferences from animal models

It is known that growth hormone (GH) plays an important role in growth and development.Additionally, emerging evidence suggest that it also influences hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function. We have found that GH from different species has different effects in mice. In rodents, human GH (hGH) binds to both GH and prolactin (PRL) receptors; it has both somatotrophic and lactotrophic effects. Since PRL has a profound effect on neuroendocrine function, the results obtained from hGH treatment or from transgenic animals expressing the hGH gene reflect PRL-like effects of this hormone. However, bovine GH (bGH) is purely somatogenic and therefore the effects of bGH represent the function of the natural GH produced in rodents. Furthermore, our studies in mice and rats have shown that not all effects of GH are stimulatory and the duration of exposure of the hypothalamo-hypophyseal-gonadal system to GH might influence the secretions of gonadotropins and gonadal steroids. In humans, excess productions of GH in acromegaly and GH resistance in Laron syndrome adversely affect reproduction. Similarly, it has been demonstrated that in transgenic mice expressing various GH genes, in insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) gene-knockout mice, in GH receptor gene-disrupted (GHR-KO) mice, and in Ames dwarf mice the onset of puberty and/or fertility is altered. Therefore, excess or subnormal secretion of GH can affect reproduction. We have shown that the hypothalamic-pituitary functions are affected in transgenic mice expressing the GH genes, Ames dwarf mice and in GH receptor gene knockout mice. The majority of the GH effects are mediated via IGF-I and the aforementioned effects may be due to the GH-induced IGF-I secretion or due to the absence of this peptide production. It is important to realize that the syntheses and actions of IGF binding proteins are controlled by IGF-I. Furthermore, some IGF binding proteins can inhibit IGF-I action. Therefore, the concentrations of IGF binding proteins and the ratio of these binding proteins and IGF-I within the body might play a pivotal role in modulating IGF-I effects on the neuroendocrine-gonadal system.     

Long-term monitoring of insulin-like growth factor I in adult growth hormone deficiency: a critical appraisal

Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels predominantly reflect the hepatic effect of growth hormone (GH). Compared with serum GH levels, which reflect pulsatile GH secretion, serum IGF-I levels exhibit no major diurnal variation and thus provide a better estimate of integrated GH secretion in an individual patient. Measurement of serum IGF-I levels allows reliable identification of states of GH excess. In contrast, in a large proportion of adults with severe GH deficiency, serum IGF-I levels are within the normal range. Serum IGF-I levels increase markedly in response to GH administration and are often used as a surrogate variable for overall responsiveness to such treatment. Current data, however, suggest a poor relationship between changes in or levels of IGF-I and efficacy variables such as body composition, muscle function and well-being. The use of serum IGF-I as a guide during dose titration in the initial phase of treatment and during long-term monitoring of GH replacement therapy in adults, and its use as a safety marker or predictor of future morbidity and mortality are discussed here.     

Treatment of acromegaly

Mortality is increased in individuals with acromegaly unless serum growth hormone (GH) levels are below 2 microg/l and serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels are normal following treatment. These combined criteria have been used to define remission of the disorder in this review. Transsphenoidal surgery achieves remission targets in an average of 55% of patients. For those not in remission following surgery, options include repeat surgery or use of adjuvant therapy. Fractionated external beam pituitary radiotherapy achieves 10-year remission rates of 47% but leaves patients exposed to excess GH until remission occurs. Stereotactic radiotherapy and gamma knife radiosurgery achieve remission rates of 40% over 3 years, and dopamine agonists produce remission in about 20% of patients. Somatostatin analogues induce remission in 59% of patients within the first year of treatment. The GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant leads to remission in 90% of patients, using IGF-I levels for assessment. Optimal treatment for a patient with acromegaly thus depends on the likely efficacy of treatment, cost, surgical skill, severity of side effects, tolerability, control of tumour growth, and improvement in complications related to tumour mass. A primary surgical approach, followed by medical therapy for those not in remission, remains the preferred option in most centres.     

Pituitary surgery for the management of acromegaly

Active acromegaly is almost always the result of a benign growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenoma of the pituitary gland. Because the same pituitary stem cell can produce both GH and prolactin (PRL), many acromegalic patients also have hyperprolactinemia. The advantages of surgical excision of pituitary adenomas associated with acromegaly include: (1) prompt decrease in GH; (2) reliable and immediate relief of the mass effect from the tumor (decompression of the optic nerves and chiasm), and (3) the opportunity to obtain tumor tissue for characterization and investigative study. Currently, more than 97% of operations for removal of pituitary tumors associated with acromegaly are done using the transsphenoidal approach rather than craniotomy. Technical advances to make the surgery safer continue to evolve, and include endoscopic approaches, computer-guided image-based intraoperative visualization, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Criteria for satisfactory remission of acromegaly after surgery are the same as those used for medical management. They include normal insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and suppression of GH to undetectable levels (<1.0 ng/ml) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Data from a recent series of 86 patients operated upon for acromegaly at the University of Virginia and followed for more than 1 year have been reviewed. In patients receiving surgery as the initial procedure, 67% had a normal IGF-I, and 52% suppressed to <1.0 ng/ml in an OGTT. There was one true recurrence of disease diagnosed 81 months after surgery. Results are best in patients with noninvasive microadenomas. Gamma knife radiosurgery has been a valuable adjunct in those patients who fail to achieve postoperative remission. Pathological evaluation of the tumors revealed that 16% expressed GH only, 25% stained for GH and glycoprotein hormones (follicle stimulating hormone, thyroid hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, alpha-subunit), 21% for GH and PRL, and 33% for GH, PRL and glycoprotein hormones. There was one acidophil stem cell tumor and 10% had the mammosomatotroph subtype. This contemporary series was free of mortality or serious complications. One patient had a transient cerebrospinal fluid leak and 3 developed transient SIADH with hyponatremia. Surgical treatment remains an important aspect of the combined management of patients with acromegaly.     

A novel role of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I. Priming neutrophils for superoxide anion secretion.

Growth hormone (GH) and the GH-dependent growth promoting peptide, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), are both potent signals for priming human and porcine polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) to secrete superoxide anion (O2-). PMA, opsonized-zymosan, or FMLP could all be used as triggering stimuli to demonstrate priming by GH or IGF-I. As positive controls, IFN-gamma and LPS also primed both human and porcine PMN for enhanced O2- release. However, only the LPS-mediated enhancement was inhibited by polymyxin B, which demonstrates that the priming induced by GH, IGF-I, or IFN-gamma was not caused by LPS contamination. Furthermore, a specific antibody to GH abrogated priming induced by this molecule. In contrast to IGF-I, the closely related molecule insulin was unable to prime PMN even at pharmacologic levels. Insulin, at pharmacologic levels, antagonized the priming mediated by IGF-I but had no effect on GH priming. A mAb directed against the human IGF-I receptor blocked the enhanced secretion of O2- by human PMN that was caused by IGF-I, but not GH, indicating that neutrophil priming induced by GH was not mediated by inducing extracellular release of IGF-I. However, priming PMN by both GH and IGF-I required de novo protein synthesis, because cycloheximide completely abrogated enhanced O2- secretion that was caused by these growth factors. These data show that a classic pituitary hormone (GH), as well as its widely recognized growth promoting peptide (IGF-I), are involved in regulating an important functional activity of both porcine and human PMN. Inasmuch as GH and IGF-I have recently been demonstrated to be synthesized by leukocytes, these data support the possibility that both of these proteins could act in a paracrine fashion as cytokines to prime PMN for an enhanced respiratory burst.     

Intrauterine growth retardation and consequences for endocrine and cardiovascular diseases in adult life: does insulin-like growth factor-I play a role?

Low birth weight has been associated with an increased incidence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and type 2 diabetes. Endocrine regulation of fetal growth by growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I is complex. Placental GH is detectable in maternal serum from the 8th to the 12th gestational week, and rises gradually during pregnancy where it replaces pituitary GH in the maternal circulation. The rise in placental GH may explain the pregnancy-induced rise in maternal serum IGF-I levels. In the fetal compartment, IGF-I levels increase significantly in normally growing fetuses from 18 to 40 weeks of gestation, but IGF-I levels are four to five times lower than those in the maternal circulation. Thus IGF-I levels in fetal as well as in maternal circulation are thought to regulate fetal growth. Circulating levels of IGF-I are thought to be genetically controlled and several IGF-I gene polymorphisms have been described. IGF-I gene polymorphisms are associated with birth weight in some studies but not in all. Likewise, IGF-I gene polymorphisms are associated with serum IGF-I in healthy adults in some studies, although some controversy exists. Serum IGF-I decreases with increasing age in healthy adults, and this decline could hypothetically be responsible for the increased risk of IHD with ageing. A recent nested case-control study found that adults without IHD, but with low circulating IGF-I levels and high IGF binding protein-3 levels, had a significantly increased risk of developing IHD during a 15-year follow-up period. In summary, the GH/IGF-I axis is involved in the regulation of fetal growth. Furthermore, it has been suggested that low IGF-I may increase the risk of IHD in otherwise healthy subjects. Hypothetically, intrauterine programming of the GH/IGF axis may influence postnatal growth, insulin resistance and consequently the risk of cardiovascular disease. Thus IGF-I may serve as a link between fetal growth and adult-onset disease.     

Growth hormone secretion during pregnancy: altered effects of growth hormone releasing factor and insulin-like growth factor-I in vitro

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is controlled by growth hormone releasing factor (GRF) but changes in the circulating level of this hormone are difficult to measure. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) is a GH-dependent growth factor which significantly but slightly inhibits stimulated GH release in vitro. We have tested the effects of GRF and IGF-I on GH release in pregnancy, a state in which serum concentrations of GH are elevated and levels of IGF-I are lowered. We have found, in a system of acutely dispersed adenohypophysial cells prepared from pregnant (day 21-23) or control cycling female rats, that adenohypophysial cells from pregnant rats have an increased GH release with GRF. In contrast, IGF-I inhibition is similar but slightly smaller. These altered responses may result in elevated serum GH levels during pregnancy.     

The effects of growth hormone on cortical and cancellous bone

Growth hormone (GH) has profound effects on linear bone growth, bone metabolism and bone mass. The GH receptor is found on the cell surface of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, but not on mature osteocytes. In vitro, GH stimulates proliferation, differentiation and extracellular matrix production in osteoblast-like cell lines. GH also stimulates recruitment and bone resorption activity in osteoclast-like cells. GH promotes autocrine/paracrine insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) production and endocrine (liver-derived) IGF-I production. Some of the GH-induced effects on bone cells can be blocked by IGF-I antibodies, while others cannot. In animal experiments, GH administration increases bone formation and resorption, and enhances cortical bone mass and mechanical strength. When GH induces linear growth, increased cancellous bone volume is seen, but an unaffected cancellous bone volume is found in the absence of linear growth. Patients with acromegaly have increased bone formation and resorption markers. Bone mass results are conflicting because many acromegalics have hypogonadism, but in acromegalics without hypogonadism, increased bone mineral density (BMD) is seen in predominantly cortical bone, and normal BMD in predominantly cancellous bone. Adult patients with growth hormone deficiency have decreased bone mineral content and BMD. GH therapy rapidly increases bone formation and resorption markers. During the first 6-12 months of therapy, declined or unchanged BMD is found in the femoral neck and lumbar spine. All GH trials with a duration of two years or more show enhanced femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD. In osteoporotic patients, GH treatment quickly increases markers for bone formation and resorption. During the first year of treatment, unchanged or decreased BMD values are found, whereas longer treatment periods report enhanced or unchanged BMD values. However, existing trials comprising relatively few patients and limited treatment periods do not allow final conclusions to be drawn regarding the effects of GH on osteoporosis during long-term treatment.     

How robust are laboratory measures of growth hormone status?

Biochemical assessment of growth hormone (GH) status is required in both suspected GH deficiency and GH excess. GH secretion can either be measured through investigation of the pituitary or by monitoring markers that change as a consequence of GH action on its target tissues. The two most widely used and, to date, best validated biochemical parameters are immunoassay measurement of either human GH (hGH) or insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I. The fundamental difference between measurement of hGH and IGF-I is that the first reflects GH secretion while the second reflects GH action. However, because GH secretion is pulsatile in nature, random blood sampling for determination of hGH levels is only minimally informative. Analytical methods for measuring GH and IGF-I show considerable between-method variability. Since these parameters are used in establishing diagnoses and in monitoring GH-related diseases, the endocrinologist should be aware of the specifications and limitations of the analytical methods available.