The stability of transmembrane helix interactions measured in a biological membrane

Despite some promising progress in the understanding of membrane protein folding and assembly, there is little experimental information regarding the thermodynamic stability of transmembrane helix interactions and even less on the stability of transmembrane helix-helix interactions in a biological membrane. Here we describe an approach that allows quantitative measurement of transmembrane helix interactions in a biological membrane, and calculation of changes in the interaction free energy resulting from substitution of single amino acids. Dimerization of several variants of the glycophorin A transmembrane domain are characterized and compared to the wild-type (wt) glycophorin A transmembrane helix dimerization. The calculated DeltaDeltaG(app) values are further compared with values found in the literature. In addition, we compare interactions between the wt glycophorin A transmembrane domain and helices in which critical glycine residues are replaced by alanine or serine, respectively. The data demonstrate that replacement of the glycine residues by serine is less destabilizing than replacement by alanine with a DeltaDeltaG(app) value of about 0.4 kcal/mol. Our study comprises the first measurement of a transmembrane helix interaction in a biological membrane, and we are optimistic that it can be further developed and applied.     

Empirical lipid propensities of amino acid residues in multispan alpha helical membrane proteins

Characterizing the interactions between amino acid residues and lipid molecules is important for understanding the assembly of transmembrane helices and for studying membrane protein folding. In this study we develop TMLIP (TransMembrane helix-LIPid), an empirically derived propensity of individual residue types to face lipid membrane based on statistical analysis of high-resolution structures of membrane proteins. Lipid accessibilities of amino acid residues within the transmembrane (TM) region of 29 structures of helical membrane proteins are studied with a spherical probe of radius of 1.9 A. Our results show that there are characteristic preferences for residues to face the headgroup region and the hydrocarbon core region of lipid membrane. Amino acid residues Lys, Arg, Trp, Phe, and Leu are often found exposed at the headgroup regions of the membrane, where they have high propensity to face phospholipid headgroups and glycerol backbones. In the hydrocarbon core region, the strongest preference for interacting with lipids is observed for Ile, Leu, Phe and Val. Small and polar amino acid residues are usually buried inside helical bundles and are strongly lipophobic. There is a strong correlation between various hydrophobicity scales and the propensity of a given residue to face the lipids in the hydrocarbon region of the bilayer. Our data suggest a possibly significant contribution of the lipophobic effect to the folding of membrane proteins. This study shows that membrane proteins have exceedingly apolar exteriors rather than highly polar interiors. Prediction of lipid-facing surfaces of boundary helices using TMLIP1 results in a 54% accuracy, which is significantly better than random (25% accuracy). We also compare performance of TMLIP with another lipid propensity scale, kPROT, and with several hydrophobicity scales using hydrophobic moment analysis.     

Proline residues in transmembrane alpha helices affect the folding of bacteriorhodopsin

Proline residues occur frequently in transmembrane alpha helices, which contrasts with their behaviour as helix-breakers in water-soluble proteins. The three membrane-embedded proline residues of bacteriorhodopsin have been replaced individually by alanine and glycine to give P50A, or P50G on helix B, P91A, or P91G on helix C, and P186A or P186G on helix F, and the effect on the protein folding kinetics has been investigated. The rate-limiting apoprotein folding step, which results in formation of a seven transmembrane, alpha helical state, was slower than wild-type protein for the Pro50 and Pro91 mutants, regardless of whether they were mutated to Ala or Gly. These proline residues give rise to several inter-helix contacts, which are therefore important in folding to the seven transmembrane helix state. No evidence for cis-trans isomerisations of the peptidyl prolyl bonds was found during this rate-limiting apoprotein folding step. Mutations of all three membrane-embedded proline residues affected the subsequent retinal binding and final folding to bacteriorhodopsin, suggesting that these proline residues contribute to formation of the retinal binding pocket within the helix bundle, again via helix/helix interactions. These results point to proline residues in transmembrane alpha helices being important in the folding of integral membrane proteins. The helix/helix interactions and hydrogen bonds that arise from the presence of proline residues in transmembrane alpha helices can affect the formation of transmembrane alpha helix bundles as well as cofactor binding pockets.     

Analysis and prediction of helix-helix interactions in membrane channels and transporters

Membrane proteins span a large variety of different functions such as cell-surface receptors, redox proteins, ion channels, and transporters. Proteins with functional pores show different characteristics of helix-helix packing as other helical membrane proteins. We found that the helix-helix contacts of 13 nonhomologous high-resolution structures of membrane channels and transporters are mainly accomplished by weakly polar amino acids (G > S > T > F) that preferably create contacts every fourth residue, typical for right-handed helix crossings. There is a strong correlation between the now available biological hydrophobicity scale and the propensities of the weakly polar and hydrophobic residues to be buried at helix-helix interfaces or to be exposed to the lipids in membrane channels and transporters. The polar residues, however, make no major contribution towards the packing of their transmembrane helices, and are therefore subsumed to be primarily exposed to the polar milieu during the folding process. The contact formation of membrane channels and transporters is therefore ruled by the solubility of the residues, which we suppose to be the driving force for the assembly of their transmembrane helices. By contrast, in 14 nonhomologous high-resolution structures of other membrane protein coils, also large and polar amino acids (D > S > M > Q) create characteristic contacts every 3.5th residues, which is a signature for left-handed helix crossings. Accordingly, it seems that dependent on the function, different concepts of folding and stabilization are realized for helical membrane proteins. Using a sequence-based matrix prediction method these differences are exploited to improve the prediction of buried and exposed residues of transmembrane helices significantly. When the sequence motifs typical for membrane channels and transporters were applied for the prediction of helix-helix contacts the quality of prediction rises by 16% to an average value of 76%, compared to the same approach when only single amino acid positions are taken into account.     

Assembly of a transmembrane b-type cytochrome is mainly driven by transmembrane helix interactions

Folding, assembly and stability of alpha-helical membrane proteins is still not very well understood. Several of these membrane proteins contain cofactors, which are essential for their function and which can be involved in protein assembly and/or stabilization. The effect of heme binding on the assembly and stability of the transmembrane b-type cytochrome b'559 was studied by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Cytochrome b'559 consists of two monomers of a 44 amino acid long polypeptide, which contains one transmembrane domain. The synthesis of two variants of the b'559 monomer, each carrying a specific fluorescent dye, allowed monitoring helix-helix interactions in micelles by resonance energy transfer. The measurements demonstrate that the transmembrane peptides dimerize in detergent in the absence and presence of the heme cofactor. Cofactor binding only marginally enhances dimerization and, apparently, the redox state of the heme group has no effect on dimerization.     

Rapid exploration of the folding topology of helical membrane proteins using paramagnetic perturbation

An understanding of the folding states of α-helical membrane proteins in detergent systems is important for functional and structural studies of these proteins. Here, we present a rapid and simple method for identification of the folding topology and assembly of transmembrane helices using paramagnetic perturbation in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. By monitoring the perturbation of signals from glycine residues located at specific sites, the folding topology and the assembly of transmembrane helices of membrane proteins were easily identified without time-consuming backbone assignment. This method is validated with Mistic (membrane-integrating sequence for translation of integral membrane protein constructs) of known structure as a reference protein. The folding topologies of two bacterial histidine kinase membrane proteins (SCO3062 and YbdK) were investigated by this method in dodecyl phosphocholine (DPC) micelles. Combing with analytical ultracentrifugation, we identified that the transmembrane domain of YbdK is present as a parallel dimer in DPC micelle. In contrast, the interaction of transmembrane domain of SCO3062 is not maintained in DPC micelle due to disruption of native structure of the periplasmic domain by DPC micelle.     

Distinct protein interfaces in transmembrane domains suggest an in vivo folding model

Given the known high-resolution structures of alpha-helical transmembrane domains, we show that there are statistically distinct classes of transmembrane interfaces which relate to the folding and oligomerization of transmembrane domains. Distinct types of interfaces have been categorized and refer to those between: the same polypeptide chain, different polypeptide chains, helices that are sequential neighbors, and those that are nonsequential. These different interfaces may reflect different phases in the mechanism of transmembrane domain folding and are consistent with the current experimental evidence pertaining to the folding and oligomerization of transmembrane domains. The classes of helix-helix interfaces have been identified in terms of the numbers and different types of pairwise amino acid interactions. The specific measures used are interaction entropy, the information content of interacting partners compared to a random set of contacts, the amino acid composition of the classes and the abundances of specific amino acid pairs in close contact. Knowledge of the clear differences in the types of helix-helix contacts helps with the derivation of knowledge-based constraints which until now have focused on only the interiors of transmembrane domains as compared to the exterior. Taken together, an in vivo model for membrane protein folding is presented, which is distinct from the familiar two-stage model. The model takes into account the different interfaces of membrane helices defined herein, and the available data regarding folding in the translocation channel.     

Interaction of transmembrane helices by a knobs-into-holes packing characteristic of soluble coiled coils

Membrane-embedded protein domains frequently exist as α-helical bundles, as exemplified by photosynthetic reaction centers, bacteriorhodopsin, and cytochrome C oxidase. The sidechain packing between their transmembrane helices was investigated by a nearest-neighbor analysis which identified sets of interfacial residues for each analyzed helix–helix interface. For the left-handed helix–helix pairs, the interfacial residues almost exclusively occupy positions a, d, e, or g within a heptad motif (abcdefg) which is repeated two to three times for each interacting helical surface. The connectivity between the interfacial residues of adjacent helices conforms to the knobs-into-holes type of sidechain packing known from soluble coiled coils. These results demonstrate on a quantitative basis that the geometry of sidechain packing is similar for left-handed helix–helix pairs embedded in membranes and coiled coils of soluble proteins. The transmembrane helix–helix interfaces studied are somewhat less compact and regular as compared to soluble coiled coils and tolerate all hydrophobic amino acid types to similar degrees. The results are discussed with respect to previous experimental findings which demonstrate that specific interactions between transmembrane helices are important for membrane protein folding and/or oligomerization. Proteins 31:150–159, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Helix packing in polytopic membrane proteins: role of glycine in transmembrane helix association.

The nature and distribution of amino acids in the helix interfaces of four polytopic membrane proteins (cytochrome c oxidase, bacteriorhodopsin, the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, and the potassium channel of Streptomyces lividans) are studied to address the role of glycine in transmembrane helix packing. In contrast to soluble proteins where glycine is a noted helix breaker, the backbone dihedral angles of glycine in transmembrane helices largely fall in the standard alpha-helical region of a Ramachandran plot. An analysis of helix packing reveals that glycine residues in the transmembrane region of these proteins are predominantly oriented toward helix-helix interfaces and have a high occurrence at helix crossing points. Moreover, packing voids are generally not formed at the position of glycine in folded protein structures. This suggests that transmembrane glycine residues mediate helix-helix interactions in polytopic membrane proteins in a fashion similar to that seen in oligomers of membrane proteins with single membrane-spanning helices. The picture that emerges is one where glycine residues serve as molecular notches for orienting multiple helices in a folded protein complex.     

Mutational analysis of the mouse mitochondrial cytochrome b gene

The protonmotive cytochrome b protein of the mitochondrial bc1 respiratory chain complex contains two reactions centers, designated Qo and Qi, which can be distinguished by the effects of different inhibitors. The nucleotide sequences have been determined of the mitochondrial cytochrome b genes from a series of mouse cell mutants selected for increased inhibitor resistance. Each mutant contains a single nucleotide change which results in an amino acid substitution. When the proximity of the altered amino acid residues to the histidines involved in heme ligation is considered, the results support a model for cytochrome b folding in which there are eight transmembrane domains rather than the nine of the Widger-Saraste model. Replacement of the Gly38 residue by valine results in resistance to the Qi inhibitors antimycin A and funiculosin but not 2-n-heptyl-hydroxyquinoline-N-oxide. Based upon sequence comparisons of mitochondrial and bacterial cytochrome b and chloroplast b6 proteins, the region of the molecule involved in antimycin binding is as highly conserved as those domains involved in heme ligation. It is suggested that the antimycin binding domain of cytochrome b is involved in forming the Qi reaction center. Alterations of the Gly142 and Thr147 residues result in resistance to myxothiazol and stimatellin, respectively. While both inhibitors block the Qo reaction center, the two mutations do not confer cross-resistance to each other. This region of cytochrome b is the most highly conserved during evolution and these inhibitor binding sites probably occur within the protein domain constituting the Qo reaction center. In addition, there is a less conserved region of the protein, defined by the Leu294 residue, which may function in binding the hydrophobic portions of Qo inhibitors.     

Helix packing moments reveal diversity and conservation in membrane protein structure

Helical membrane proteins are more tightly packed and the packing interactions are more diverse than those found in helical soluble proteins. Based on a linear correlation between amino acid packing values and interhelical propensity, we propose the concept of a helix packing moment to predict the orientation of helices in helical membrane proteins and membrane protein complexes. We show that the helix packing moment correlates with the helix interfaces of helix dimers of single pass membrane proteins of known structure. Helix packing moments are also shown to help identify the packing interfaces in membrane proteins with multiple transmembrane helices, where a single helix can have multiple contact surfaces. Analyses are described on class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with seven transmembrane helices. We show that the helix packing moments are conserved across the class A family of GPCRs and correspond to key structural contacts in rhodopsin. These contacts are distinct from the highly conserved signature motifs of GPCRs and have not previously been recognized. The specific amino acid types involved in these contacts, however, are not necessarily conserved between subfamilies of GPCRs, indicating that the same protein architecture can be supported by a diverse set of interactions. In GPCRs, as well as membrane channels and transporters, amino acid residues with small side-chains (Gly, Ala, Ser, Cys) allow tight helix packing by mediating strong van der Waals interactions between helices. Closely packed helices, in turn, facilitate interhelical hydrogen bonding of both weakly polar (Ser, Thr, Cys) and strongly polar (Asn, Gln, Glu, Asp, His, Arg, Lys) amino acid residues. We propose the use of the helix packing moment as a complementary tool to the helical hydrophobic moment in the analysis of transmembrane sequences.     

Transmembrane helix dimerization: beyond the search for sequence motifs

Studies of the dimerization of transmembrane (TM) helices have been ongoing for many years now, and have provided clues to the fundamental principles behind membrane protein (MP) folding. Our understanding of TM helix dimerization has been dominated by the idea that sequence motifs, simple recognizable amino acid sequences that drive lateral interaction, can be used to explain and predict the lateral interactions between TM helices in membrane proteins. But as more and more unique interacting helices are characterized, it is becoming clear that the sequence motif paradigm is incomplete. Experimental evidence suggests that the search for sequence motifs, as mediators of TM helix dimerization, cannot solve the membrane protein folding problem alone. Here we review the current understanding in the field, as it has evolved from the paradigm of sequence motifs into a view in which the interactions between TM helices are much more complex. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Membrane protein structure and function.     

Assembly of cytochrome f into the cytochrome bf complex in isolated pea chloroplasts.

Structural features of cytochrome f necessary for assembly into the cytochrome bf complex were examined in isolated pea chloroplasts following import of (35)S-labelled chimeric precursor proteins, consisting of the presequence of the small subunit of Rubisco fused to the turnip cytochrome f precursor. Assembly was detected by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis of dodecyl maltoside-solubilized thylakoid membranes. A cytochrome f polypeptide unable to bind haem because of mutagenesis of Cys21 and Cys24 to alanine residues was assembled into the complex and had similar stability to the wild-type polypeptide. This indicates that covalent haem binding to cytochrome f is not necessary for assembly of the protein into the cytochrome bf complex. A truncated protein lacking the C-terminal 33 amino acid residues, including the transmembrane span and the stroma-exposed region, was translocated across the thylakoid membrane, had a similar stability to wild-type cytochrome f but was not assembled into the complex. This indicates that the C-terminal region of cytochrome f is important for assembly into the complex. A mutant cytochrome f unable to bind haem and lacking the C-terminal region was also translocated across the thylakoid membrane but was extremely labile, indicating that, in the absence of the C-terminal membrane anchor, haem-less cytochrome f is recognized by a thylakoid proteolytic system.     

Thermostability of membrane protein helix-helix interaction elucidated by statistical analysis

A prerequisite for the survival of (micro)organisms at high temperatures is an adaptation of protein stability to extreme environmental conditions. In contrast to soluble proteins, where many factors have already been identified, the mechanisms by which the thermostability of membrane proteins is enhanced are almost unknown. The hydrophobic membrane environment constrains possible stabilizing factors for transmembrane domains, so that a difference might be expected between soluble and membrane proteins. Here we present sequence analysis of predicted transmembrane helices of the genomes from eight thermophilic and 12 mesophilic organisms. A comparison of the amino acid compositions indicates that more polar residues can be found in the transmembrane helices of thermophilic organisms. Particularly, the amino acids aspartic acid and glutamic acid replace the corresponding amides. Cysteine residues are found to be significantly decreased by about 70% in thermophilic membrane domains suggesting a non-specific function of most cysteine residues in transmembrane domains of mesophilic organisms. By a pair-motif analysis of the two sets of transmembrane helices, we found that the small residues glycine and serine contribute more to transmembrane helix-helix interactions in thermophilic organisms. This may result in a tighter packing of the helices allowing more hydrogen bond formation.     

Complex Patterns of Histidine, Hydroxylated Amino Acids and the GxxxG Motif Mediate High-affinity Transmembrane Domain Interactions

Specific interactions of transmembrane helices play a pivotal role in the folding and oligomerization of integral membrane proteins. The helix-helix interfaces frequently depend on specific amino acid patterns. In this study, a heptad repeat pattern was randomized with all naturally occurring amino acids to uncover novel sequence motifs promoting transmembrane domain interactions. Self-interacting transmembrane domains were selected from the resulting combinatorial library by means of the ToxR/POSSYCCAT system. A comparison of the amino acid composition of high-and low-affinity sequences revealed that high-affinity transmembrane domains exhibit position-specific enrichment of histidine. Further, sequences containing His preferentially display Gly, Ser, and/or Thr residues at flanking positions and frequently contain a C-terminal GxxxG motif. Mutational analysis of selected sequences confirmed the importance of these residues in homotypic interaction. Probing heterotypic interaction indicated that His interacts in trans with hydroxylated residues. Reconstruction of minimal interaction motifs within the context of an oligo-Leu sequence confirmed that His is part of a hydrogen bonded cluster that is brought into register by the GxxxG motif. Notably, a similar motif contributes to self-interaction of the BNIP3 transmembrane domain.     

Caveolin-Na/K-ATPase interactions: Role of transmembrane topology in non-genomic steroid signal transduction

Progesterone and its polar metabolite(s) trigger the meiotic divisions in the amphibian oocyte through a non-genomic signaling system at the plasma membrane. Published site-directed mutagenesis studies of ouabain binding and progesterone-ouabain competition studies indicate that progesterone binds to a 23 amino acid extracellular loop of the plasma membrane α-subunit of Na/K-ATPase. Integral membrane proteins such as caveolins are reported to form Na/K-ATPase-peptide complexes essential for signal transduction. We have characterized the progesterone-induced Na/K-ATPase-caveolin (CAV-1)-steroid 5α-reductase interactions initiating the meiotic divisions. Peptide sequence analysis algorithms indicate that CAV-1 contains two plasma membrane spanning helices, separated by as few as 1-2 amino acid residues at the cell surface. The CAV-1 scaffolding domain, reported to interact with CAV-1 binding (CB) motifs in signaling proteins, overlaps transmembrane (TM) helix 1. The α-subunit of Na/K-ATPase (10 TM helices) contains double CB motifs within TM-1 and TM-10. Steroid 5α-reductase (6 TM helices), an initial step in polar steroid formation, contains CB motifs overlapping TM-1 and TM-6. Computer analysis predicts that interaction between antipathic strands may bring CB motifs and scaffolding domains into close proximity, initiating allostearic changes. Progesterone binding to the α-subunit may thus facilitate CB motif:CAV-1 interaction, which in turn induces helix-helix interaction and generates both a signaling cascade and formation of polar steroids.     

Assembly of a transmembrane b-Type cytochrome is mainly driven by transmembrane helix interactions

Folding, assembly and stability of α-helical membrane proteins is still not very well understood. Several of these membrane proteins contain cofactors, which are essential for their function and which can be involved in protein assembly and/or stabilization. The effect of heme binding on the assembly and stability of the transmembrane b-type cytochrome b₅₅₉^′ was studied by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Cytochrome b₅₅₉^′ consists of two monomers of a 44 amino acid long polypeptide, which contains one transmembrane domain. The synthesis of two variants of the b₅₅₉^′ monomer, each carrying a specific fluorescent dye, allowed monitoring helix-helix interactions in micelles by resonance energy transfer. The measurements demonstrate that the transmembrane peptides dimerize in detergent in the absence and presence of the heme cofactor. Cofactor binding only marginally enhances dimerization and, apparently, the redox state of the heme group has no effect on dimerization.     

Folding determinants of disulfide bond forming protein B explored by solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

The two-stage model for membrane protein folding postulates that individual helices form first and are subsequently packed against each other. To probe the two-stage model, the structures of peptides representing individual transmembrane helices of the disulfide bond forming protein B have been studied in trifluoroethanol solution as well as in detergent micelles using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and circular dichroism spectroscopy. In TFE solution, peptides showed well-defined α-helical structures. Peptide structures in TFE were compared to the structures of full-length protein obtained by X-ray crystallography and NMR. The extent of α-helical secondary structure coincided well, lending support for the two-stage model for membrane protein folding. However, the conformation of some amino acid side chains differs between the structures of peptide and full-length protein. In micellar solution, the peptides also adopted a helical structure, albeit of reduced definition. Using measurements of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement, peptides were confirmed to be embedded in micelles. These observations may indicate that in the native protein, tertiary interactions additionally stabilize the secondary structure of the individual transmembrane helices.     

Comparison of helix interactions in membrane and soluble alpha-bundle proteins

Helix-helix interactions are important for the folding, stability, and function of membrane proteins. Here, two independent and complementary methods are used to investigate the nature and distribution of amino acids that mediate helix-helix interactions in membrane and soluble alpha-bundle proteins. The first method characterizes the packing density of individual amino acids in helical proteins based on the van der Waals surface area occluded by surrounding atoms. We have recently used this method to show that transmembrane helices pack more tightly, on average, than helices in soluble proteins. These studies are extended here to characterize the packing of interfacial and noninterfacial amino acids and the packing of amino acids in the interfaces of helices that have either right- or left-handed crossing angles, and either parallel or antiparallel orientations. We show that the most abundant tightly packed interfacial residues in membrane proteins are Gly, Ala, and Ser, and that helices with left-handed crossing angles are more tightly packed on average than helices with right-handed crossing angles. The second method used to characterize helix-helix interactions involves the use of helix contact plots. We find that helices in membrane proteins exhibit a broader distribution of interhelical contacts than helices in soluble proteins. Both helical membrane and soluble proteins make use of a general motif for helix interactions that relies mainly on four residues (Leu, Ala, Ile, Val) to mediate helix interactions in a fashion characteristic of left-handed helical coiled coils. However, a second motif for mediating helix interactions is revealed by the high occurrence and high average packing values of small and polar residues (Ala, Gly, Ser, Thr) in the helix interfaces of membrane proteins. Finally, we show that there is a strong linear correlation between the occurrence of residues in helix-helix interfaces and their packing values, and discuss these results with respect to membrane protein structure prediction and membrane protein stability.     

Folding and assembly in rhodopsin. Effect of mutations in the sixth transmembrane helix on the conformation of the third cytoplasmic loop.

Previous studies on bovine opsin folding and assembly have identified an amino-terminal fragment, EF(1-232), which folds and inserts into a membrane only after coexpression with its complementary carboxyl-terminal fragment, EF(233-348). To further characterize this interaction, EF(1-232) production was examined upon coexpression with carboxyl-terminal fragments of varying length and/or amino acid composition. These included fragments with incremental deletions of the third cytoplasmic loop (TH(241-348) and EF(249-348)), a fragment composed of the third cytoplasmic loop and sixth transmembrane helix (HF(233-280)), a fragment composed of the sixth and seventh transmembrane helices (FG(249-312)), and EF(233-348) and TH(241-348) fragments with Pro-267 or Trp-265 mutations. Although EF(1-232) production was independent of the third cytoplasmic loop and carboxyl-terminal tail, both the sixth and seventh transmembrane helices were essential. The effects of mutations in the sixth transmembrane helix on EF(1-232) expression were dependent on the length of the third cytoplasmic loop. Although Pro-267 mutations in EF(233-348) failed to stabilize EF(1-232) expression, their introduction into TH(241-348) was without discernible effects. However, Trp-265 substitutions in the EF(233-348) and TH(241-348) fragments conferred significant EF(1-232) production. Therefore, key residues in the transmembrane helices may exert their effects on opsin folding, assembly, and/or function by influencing the conformation of the connecting loops.