GAPs galore! A survey of putative Ras superfamily GTPase activating proteins in man and Drosophila

Typical members of the Ras superfamily of small monomeric GTP-binding proteins function as regulators of diverse processes by cycling between biologically active GTP- and inactive GDP-bound conformations. Proteins that control this cycling include guanine nucleotide exchange factors or GEFs, which activate Ras superfamily members by catalyzing GTP for GDP exchange, and GTPase activating proteins or GAPs, which accelerate the low intrinsic GTP hydrolysis rate of typical Ras superfamily members, thus causing their inactivation. Two among the latter class of proteins have been implicated in common genetic disorders associated with an increased cancer risk, neurofibromatosis-1, and tuberous sclerosis. To facilitate genetic analysis, I surveyed Drosophila and human sequence databases for genes predicting proteins related to GAPs for Ras superfamily members. Remarkably, close to 0.5% of genes in both species (173 human and 64 Drosophila genes) predict proteins related to GAPs for Arf, Rab, Ran, Rap, Ras, Rho, and Sar family GTPases. Information on these genes has been entered into a pair of relational databases, which can be used to identify evolutionary conserved proteins that are likely to serve basic biological functions, and which can be updated when definitive information on the coding potential of both genomes becomes available.     

CAPRI regulates Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of the Ras-MAPK pathway.

Ca(2+) is a universal second messenger that is critical for cell growth and is intimately associated with many Ras-dependent cellular processes such as proliferation and differentiation. Ras is a small GTP binding protein that operates as a molecular switch regulating the control of gene expression, cell growth, and differentiation through a pathway from receptors to mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). A role for intracellular Ca(2+) in the activation of Ras has been previously demonstrated, e.g., via the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase PYK2 and by Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) such as Ras-GRF; however, there is no Ca(2+)-dependent mechanism for direct inactivation. An important advance toward greater understanding of the complex coordination within the Ras-signaling network is the spatio-temporal analysis of signaling events in vivo. Here, we describe the identification of CAPRI (Ca(2+)-promoted Ras inactivator), a Ca(2+)-dependent Ras GTPase-activating protein (GAP) that switches off the Ras-MAPK pathway following a stimulus that elevates intracellular Ca(2+). Analysis of the spatio-temporal dynamics of CAPRI indicates that Ca(2+) regulates the GAP by a fast C2 domain-dependent translocation mechanism.     

RasGRP proteins--Ras-activating factors

The Ras proteins, members of small GTP-binding protein family, are regulated through the exchange of GTP/GDP nucleotide. The activity of the Ras proteins is controlled by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTP-ase activating proteins (GAPs), which activate and inactivate G proteins respectively. Beside other, well known Ras-activating GEFs, the new class of such factors was recently described. RasGRP family, known also as CalDAG-GEF, consists of four members. C1 domain, allows them to bind diacylglycerol as well as DAG-analogs like phorbol esters. Binding of the ligand leads to activation of RasGRPs and in consequence to the activation of Ras and Rap proteins by the exchange of bounded guanine nucleotides. The signal transmitted by RasGRP is terminated as a result of DAG phosphorylation catalyzed by diacylglycerol kinase (DGK). Location of RasGRP proteins on the crossing of signaling cascades and broad tissue expression pattern involve them in many events essential for the cell function. RasGRP proteins play roles in such phenomena as: T cells maturation and functioning, B cells response, platelet aggregation, mast cells activity regulation, transformation and many other. In this review, structure and function of RasGRP proteins, as well as their role in neoplastic transformation are described.     

Differential regulation of NFAT and SRF by the B cell receptor via a PLCgamma-Ca(2+)-dependent pathway

NFAT and SRF are important in the regulation of proliferation and cytokine production in lymphocytes. NFAT activation by the B cell receptor (BCR) occurs via the PLCgamma-Ca(2+)-calcineurin pathway, however how the BCR activates SRF is unclear. We show here that like NFAT, BCR regulation of SRF occurs via an Src-Syk-Tec-PLCgamma-Ca(2+) (Lyn-Syk-Btk-PLCgamma-Ca(2+)) pathway. However, SRF responds to lower Ca(2+) and is less dependent on IP(3)R expression than NFAT. Ca(2+)-regulated calcineurin plays a partial role in SRF activation, in combination with diacylglycerol (DAG), while is fully required for NFAT activation. Signals from the DAG effectors protein kinase C, Ras and Rap1, and the downstream MEK-ERK pathway are required for both SRF and NFAT; however, NFAT but not SRF is dependent on JNK signals. Both SRF and NFAT were also dependent on Rac, Rho, CDC42 and actin. Finally, we show that Ca(2+) is not required for ERK activation, but instead for its association with nuclear areas of the cell. These data suggest that combinatorial assembly of signaling pathways emanating from the BCR differentially regulate NFAT and SRF, to activate gene expression.     

Probing the GTPase cycle with real-time NMR: GAP and GEF activities in cell extracts

The Ras superfamily of small GTPases is a large family of switch-like proteins that control diverse cellular functions, and their deregulation is associated with multiple disease processes. When bound to GTP they adopt a conformation that interacts with effector proteins, whereas the GDP-bound state is generally biologically inactive. GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) promote hydrolysis of GTP, thus impeding the biological activity of GTPases, whereas guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) promote exchange of GDP for GTP and activate GTPase proteins. A number of methods have been developed to assay GTPase nucleotide hydrolysis and exchange, as well as the activity of GAPs and GEFs. The kinetics of these reactions are often studied with purified proteins and fluorescent nucleotide analogs, which have been shown to non-specifically impact hydrolysis and exchange. Most GAPs and GEFs are large multidomain proteins subject to complex regulation that is challenging to reconstitute in vitro. In cells, the activities of full-length GAPs or GEFs are typically assayed indirectly on the basis of nucleotide loading of the cognate GTPase, or by exploiting their interaction with effector proteins. Here, we describe a recently developed real-time NMR method to assay kinetics of nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis reactions by direct monitoring of nucleotide-dependent structural changes in an isotopically labeled GTPase. The unambiguous readout of this method makes it possible to precisely measure GAP and GEF activities from extracts of mammalian cells, enabling studies of their catalytic and regulatory mechanisms. We present examples of NMR-based assays of full-length GAPs and GEFs overexpressed in mammalian cells.     

Ca2+-dependent monomer and dimer formation switches CAPRI Protein between Ras GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and RapGAP activities

CAPRI is a member of the GAP1 family of GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for small G proteins. It is known to function as an amplitude sensor for intracellular Ca(2+) levels stimulated by extracellular signals and has a catalytic domain with dual RasGAP and RapGAP activities. Here, we have investigated the mechanism that switches CAPRI between its two GAP activities. We demonstrate that CAPRI forms homodimers in vitro and in vivo in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. The site required for dimerization was pinpointed by deletion and point mutations to a helix motif that forms a hydrophobic face in the extreme C-terminal tail of the CAPRI protein. Deletion of this helix motif abolished dimer formation but did not affect translocation of CAPRI to the plasma membrane upon cell stimulation with histamine. We found that dimeric and monomeric CAPRI coexist in cells and that the ratio of dimeric to monomeric CAPRI increases upon cell stimulation with histamine. Free Ca(2+) at physiologically relevant concentrations was both necessary and sufficient for dimer formation. Importantly, the monomeric and dimeric forms of CAPRI exhibited differential GAP activities in vivo; the wild-type form of CAPRI had stronger RapGAP activity than RasGAP activity, whereas a monomeric CAPRI mutant showed stronger RasGAP than RapGAP activity. These results demonstrate that CAPRI switches between its dual GAP roles by forming monomers or homodimers through a process regulated by Ca(2+). We propose that Ca(2+)-dependent dimerization of CAPRI may serve to coordinate Ras and Rap1 signaling pathways.     

Recent advances in Ca(2+)-dependent Ras regulation and cell proliferation

Our understanding of the mechanisms whereby growth factors stimulate cell proliferation through the Ras pathway stems largely from studies of the canonical pathway involving recruitment of Ras activators and inhibitors to the vicinity of receptor tyrosine kinases via phosphotyrosine-binding adaptor proteins. Ca(2+) has seldom joined the party, despite the identification of phospholipase Cgamma and Ca(2+) entry as receptor tyrosine kinase-dependent signals. Mechanisms by which Ca(2+) can directly influence Ras activity have remained relatively elusive. Similarly, the mechanisms whereby Ca(2+) modulates the cell cycle have been equally murky, and yet there are some interesting parallels in the role of Ras and Ca(2+) in cell cycle re-entry. This review focuses on a number of novel mechanisms that link Ca(2+) with the regulation of Ras activity and signaling output. Their collective discovery adds to the complexities of Ras regulation and raises further questions about the role of Ca(2+) signals in Ras-dependent cell proliferation.     

GEFs and GAPs: critical elements in the control of small G proteins

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) regulate the activity of small guanine nucleotide-binding (G) proteins to control cellular functions. In general, GEFs turn on signaling by catalyzing the exchange from G-protein-bound GDP to GTP, whereas GAPs terminate signaling by inducing GTP hydrolysis. GEFs and GAPs are multidomain proteins that are regulated by extracellular signals and localized cues that control cellular events in time and space. Recent evidence suggests that these proteins may be potential therapeutic targets for developing drugs to treat various diseases, including cancer.     

Regulatory proteins of R-Ras, TC21/R-Ras2, and M-Ras/R-Ras3

We studied the regulation of three closely related members of Ras family G proteins, R-Ras, TC21 (also known as R-Ras2), and M-Ras (R-Ras3). Guanine nucleotide exchange of R-Ras and TC21 was promoted by RasGRF, C3G, CalDAG-GEFI, CalDAG-GEFII (RasGRP), and CalDAG-GEFIII both in 293T cells and in vitro. By contrast, guanine nucleotide exchange of M-Ras was promoted by the guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the classical Ras (Ha-, K-, and N-), including mSos, RasGRF, CalDAG-GEFII, and CalDAG-GEFIII. GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for Ras, Gap1(m), p120 GAP, and NF-1 stimulated all of the R-Ras, TC21, and M-Ras proteins, whereas R-Ras GAP stimulated R-Ras and TC21 but not M-Ras. We did not find any remarkable difference in the subcellular localization of R-Ras, TC21, or M-Ras when these were expressed with a green fluorescent protein tag in 293T cells and MDCK cells. In conclusion, TC21 and R-Ras were regulated by the same GEFs and GAPs, whereas M-Ras was regulated as the classical Ras.     

Specificity in Ras and Rap Signaling

Ras and Rap proteins are closely related small GTPases. Whereas Ras is known for its role in cell proliferation and survival, Rap1 is predominantly involved in cell adhesion and cell junction formation. Ras and Rap are regulated by different sets of guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GTPase-activating proteins, determining one level of specificity. In addition, although the effector domains are highly similar, Rap and Ras interact with largely different sets of effectors, providing a second level of specificity. In this review, we discuss the regulatory proteins and effectors of Ras and Rap, with a focus on those of Rap.Ras-like small G-proteins are ubiquitously expressed, conserved molecular switches that couple extracellular signals to various cellular responses. Different signals can activate GEFs² that induce the small G-protein to switch from the inactive, GDP-bound state to the active, GTP-bound state. This induces a conformational change that allows downstream effector proteins to bind specifically to and be activated by the GTP-bound protein to mediate diverse biological responses. Small G-proteins are returned to the GDP-bound state by hydrolyzing GTP with the help of GAPs. Ras (Ha-Ras, Ki-Ras, and N-Ras) and Rap proteins (Rap1A, Rap1B, Rap2A, Rap2B, and Rap2C) have similar effector-binding regions that interact predominantly with RA domains or the structurally similar RBDs present in a variety of different proteins. Both protein families operate in different signaling networks. For instance, Ras is central in a network controlling cell proliferation and cell survival, whereas Rap1 predominantly controls cell adhesion, cell junction formation, cell secretion, and cell polarity. These different functions are reflected in a largely different set of GEFs and GAPs. Also the downstream effector proteins operate in a selective manner in either one of the networks.     

Diacylglycerol kinase zeta regulates Ras activation by a novel mechanism

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) activate Ras by facilitating its GTP binding. Ras guanyl nucleotide-releasing protein (GRP) was recently identified as a Ras GEF that has a diacylglycerol (DAG)-binding C1 domain. Its exchange factor activity is regulated by local availability of signaling DAG. DAG kinases (DGKs) metabolize DAG by converting it to phosphatidic acid. Because they can attenuate local accumulation of signaling DAG, DGKs may regulate RasGRP activity and, consequently, activation of Ras. DGK zeta, but not other DGKs, completely eliminated Ras activation induced by RasGRP, and DGK activity was required for this mechanism. DGK zeta also coimmunoprecipitated and colocalized with RasGRP, indicating that these proteins associate in a signaling complex. Coimmunoprecipitation of DGK zeta and RasGRP was enhanced in the presence of phorbol esters, which are DAG analogues that cannot be metabolized by DGKs, suggesting that DAG signaling can induce their interaction. Finally, overexpression of kinase-dead DGK zeta in Jurkat cells prolonged Ras activation after ligation of the T cell receptor. Thus, we have identified a novel way to regulate Ras activation: through DGK zeta, which controls local accumulation of DAG that would otherwise activate RasGRP.     

A novel <Emphasis Type="Italic">Dictyostelium</Emphasis> RasGEF required for chemotaxis and development

Background  

Ras proteins are guanine-nucleotide-binding enzymes that couple cell surface receptors to intracellular signaling pathways controlling cell proliferation and differentiation, both in lower and higher eukaryotes. They act as molecular switches by cycling between active GTP and inactive GDP-bound states, through the action of two classes of regulatory proteins: a) guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEFs) and b) GTP-ase activating proteins (GAPs). Genome wide analysis of the lower eukaryote Dictyostelium discoideum revealed a surprisingly large number of Ras Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (RasGEFs). RasGEFs promote the activation of Ras proteins by catalyzing the exchange of GDP for GTP, thus conferring to RasGEFs the role of main activator of Ras proteins. Up to date only four RasGEFs, which are all non-redundant either for growth or development, have been characterized in Dictyostelium. We report here the identification and characterization of a fifth non-redundant GEF, RasGEFM.     

Computational model explains high activity and rapid cycling of Rho GTPases within protein complexes

Formation of multiprotein complexes on cellular membranes is critically dependent on the cyclic activation of small GTPases. FRAP-based analyses demonstrate that within protein complexes, some small GTPases cycle nearly three orders of magnitude faster than they would spontaneously cycle in vitro. At the same time, experiments report concomitant excess of the activated, GTP-bound form of GTPases over their inactive form. Intuitively, high activity and rapid turnover are contradictory requirements. How the cells manage to maximize both remains poorly understood. Here, using GTPases of the Rab and Rho families as a prototype, we introduce a computational model of the GTPase cycle. We quantitatively investigate several plausible layouts of the cycling control module that consist of GEFs, GAPs, and GTPase effectors. We explain the existing experimental data and predict how the cycling of GTPases is controlled by the regulatory proteins in vivo. Our model explains distinct and separable roles that the activating GEFs and deactivating GAPs play in the GTPase cycling control. While the activity of GTPase is mainly defined by GEF, the turnover rate is a sole function of GAP. Maximization of the GTPase activity and turnover rate places conflicting requirements on the concentration of GAP. Therefore, to achieve a high activity and turnover rate at once, cells must carefully maintain concentrations of GEFs and GAPs within the optimal range. The values of these optimal concentrations indicate that efficient cycling can be achieved only within dense protein complexes typically assembled on the membrane surfaces. We show that the concentration requirement for GEF can be dramatically reduced by a GEF-activating GTPase effector that can also significantly boost the cycling efficiency. Interestingly, we find that the cycling regimes are only weakly dependent on the concentration of GTPase itself.     

Regulation of small GTPases at epithelial cell-cell junctions

Small GTPases of the Rho family (RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42) and the Ras family GTPase Rap1 are essential for the assembly and function of epithelial cell-cell junctions. Through their downstream effectors, small GTPases modulate junction formation and stability, primarily by orchestrating the polymerization and contractility of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. The major upstream regulators of small GTPases are guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). Several GEFs and a few GAPs have been localized at epithelial junctions, and bind to specific junctional proteins. Thus, junctional proteins can regulate small GTPases at junctions, through their interactions with GEFs and GAPs. Here we review the current knowledge about the mechanisms of regulation of small GTPases by junctional proteins. Understanding these mechanisms will help to clarify at the molecular level how small GTPases control the morphogenesis and physiology of epithelial tissues, and how they are disregulated in disease.     

Activation of TRPC6 calcium channels by diacylglycerol (DAG)-containing arachidonic acid: a comparative study with DAG-containing docosahexaenoic acid

We synthesized a diacylglycerol (DAG)-containing arachidonic acid, i.e., 1-stearoyl-2-arachidonyl-sn-glycerol (SAG), and studied its implication in the modulation of canonical transient receptor potential sub-type 6 (TRPC6) channels in stably-transfected HEK-293 cells. SAG induced the influx of Ca(2+), and also of other bivalent cations like Ba(2+) and Sr(2+), in these cells. SAG-evoked Ca(2+) influx was not due to its metabolites as inhibitors of DAG-lipase (RHC80267) and DAG-kinase (R50922) failed to inhibit the response of the same. To emphasise that SAG exerts its action via its DAG configuration, but not due to the presence of stearic acid at sn-1 position, we synthesized 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonyl-sn-glycerol (PAG). PAG-induced increases in [Ca(2+)](i) were not significantly different from those induced by SAG. For the comparative studies, we also synthesized the DAG-containing docosahexaenoic acid, i.e., 1-stearoyl-2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycerol (SDG). We observed that SDG and 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol (DOG), a DAG analogue, also evoked increases in [Ca(2+)](i), which were lesser than those evoked by SAG. However, activation of TRPC6 channels by all the DAG molecular species (SAG, DOG and SDG) required Src kinases as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, PP2 and SU6656, significantly attenuated the increases in [Ca(2+)](i) evoked by these agents. Moreover, disruption of lipid rafts with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin completely abolished SAG-, DOG- and SDG-induced increases in [Ca(2+)](i). The present study shows that SAG as well as SDG and DOG stimulate Ca(2+) influx through the activation of TRPC6 calcium channels which are regulated by Src kinases and intact lipid raft domains.     

Store-operated Ca2+ entry in astrocytes: different spatial arrangement of endoplasmic reticulum explains functional diversity in vitro and in situ

Ca(2+) signaling is the astrocyte form of excitability and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) plays an important role as an intracellular Ca(2+) store. Since the subcellular distribution of the ER influences Ca(2+) signaling, we compared the arrangement of ER in astrocytes of hippocampus tissue and astrocytes in cell culture by electron microscopy. While the ER was usually located in close apposition to the plasma membrane in astrocytes in situ, the ER in cultured astrocytes was close to the nuclear membrane. Activation of metabotropic receptors linked to release of Ca(2+) from ER stores triggered distinct responses in cultured and in situ astrocytes. In culture, Ca(2+) signals were commonly first recorded close to the nucleus and with a delay at peripheral regions of the cells. Store-operated Ca(2+) entry (SOC) as a route to refill the Ca(2+) stores could be easily identified in cultured astrocytes as the Zn(2+)-sensitive component of the Ca(2+) signal. In contrast, such a Zn(2+)-sensitive component was not recorded in astrocytes from hippocampal slices despite of evidence for SOC. Our data indicate that both, astrocytes in situ and in vitro express SOC necessary to refill stores, but that a SOC-related signal is not recorded in the cytoplasm of astrocytes in situ since the stores are close to the plasma membrane and the refill does not affect cytoplasmic Ca(2+) levels.     

Diacylglycerol mediates the T-cell receptor-driven Ca(2+) influx in T cells by a novel mechanism independent of protein kinase C activation

The mechanism of Ca(2+) influx in nonexcitable cells is not known yet. According to the capacitative hypothesis, Ca(2+) influx is triggered by IP(3)-mediated Ca(2+) release from the intracellular Ca(2+) stores. Conversely, many workers have reported a lack of association between release and influx. In this work, the role of diacylglycerol (DAG) as the mediator of T-cell receptor (TCR)-driven Ca(2+) influx in T cells was investigated. Stimulation of mouse splenic T cells with naturally occurring DAG caused Ca(2+) entry in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Such stimulation was blocked by Ni(2+), a divalent cation known to block Ca(2+) channels. Inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) by calphostin C did not inhibit, but slightly enhanced, the DAG-stimulated Ca(2+) entry. However, inhibition of DAG metabolism by DAG kinase and lipase inhibitors enhanced the DAG-stimulated Ca(2+) entry. DAG lipase and kinase inhibitors also enhanced the Ca(2+) entry in T cells stimulated through TCR/CD3 complex with anti-CD3 antibody. Calphostin C did not affect the anti-CD3-stimulated Ca(2+) entry. These results showed that TCR-driven Ca(2+) influx in T cells is mediated by DAG through a novel mechanism(s) independent of PKC activation.     

Regulation of small GTPases at epithelial cell-cell junctions

Abstract

Small GTPases of the Rho family (RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42) and the Ras family GTPase Rap1 are essential for the assembly and function of epithelial cell-cell junctions. Through their downstream effectors, small GTPases modulate junction formation and stability, primarily by orchestrating the polymerization and contractility of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. The major upstream regulators of small GTPases are guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). Several GEFs and a few GAPs have been localized at epithelial junctions, and bind to specific junctional proteins. Thus, junctional proteins can regulate small GTPases at junctions, through their interactions with GEFs and GAPs. Here we review the current knowledge about the mechanisms of regulation of small GTPases by junctional proteins. Understanding these mechanisms will help to clarify at the molecular level how small GTPases control the morphogenesis and physiology of epithelial tissues, and how they are disregulated in disease.     

Mechanisms of signal transduction in photo-stimulated secretion in Phaeocystis globosa

Phaeocystis globosa, a leading agent in marine carbon cycling, releases its photosynthesized biopolymers via regulated exocytosis. Release is elicited by blue light and relayed by a characteristic cytosolic Ca(2+) signal. However, the source of Ca(2+) in these cells has not been established. The present studies indicate that Phaeocystis' secretory granules work as an intracellular Ca(2+) oscillator. Optical tomography reveals that photo-stimulation induces InsP(3)-triggered periodic lumenal [Ca(2+)] oscillations in the granule and corresponding out-of-phase cytosolic oscillations of [Ca(2+)] that trigger exocytosis. This Ca(2+) dynamics results from an interplay between the intragranular polyanionic matrix, and two Ca(2+)-sensitive ion channels located on the granule membrane: an InsP(3)-receptor-Ca(2+) channel, and an apamin-sensitive K(+) channel.