Endoplasmic reticulum stress associated responses in cancer

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is responsible for many housekeeping functions within the cell and is an important site for pathways that regulates its state of homeostasis. When cellular states perturb ER functions, a phenomenon termed “ER stress” activates a number of pathways to counteract the associated damages; these pathways are together called the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR has a dualistic function; it exists to alleviate damage associated with ER stress, however, if this is not possible, then it signals for cell death through apoptosis. Cancer cells are shown to be very resilient under extreme environmental stress and an increasing number of studies have indicated that this may be largely due to an altered state of the UPR. The role of ER stress and the UPR in cancer is still not clear, however many components are involved and may prove to be promising targets in future anti-cancer therapy. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Calcium Signaling in Health and Disease. Guest Editors: Geert Bultynck, Jacques Haiech, Claus W. Heizmann, Joachim Krebs, and Marc Moreau.     

Lifespan Extension Conferred by Endoplasmic Reticulum Secretory Pathway Deficiency Requires Induction of the Unfolded Protein Response

Cells respond to accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by activating the unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling pathway. The UPR restores ER homeostasis by degrading misfolded proteins, inhibiting translation, and increasing expression of chaperones that enhance ER protein folding capacity. Although ER stress and protein aggregation have been implicated in aging, the role of UPR signaling in regulating lifespan remains unknown. Here we show that deletion of several UPR target genes significantly increases replicative lifespan in yeast. This extended lifespan depends on a functional ER stress sensor protein, Ire1p, and is associated with constitutive activation of upstream UPR signaling. We applied ribosome profiling coupled with next generation sequencing to quantitatively examine translational changes associated with increased UPR activity and identified a set of stress response factors up-regulated in the long-lived mutants. Besides known UPR targets, we uncovered up-regulation of components of the cell wall and genes involved in cell wall biogenesis that confer resistance to multiple stresses. These findings demonstrate that the UPR is an important determinant of lifespan that governs ER stress and identify a signaling network that couples stress resistance to longevity.     

UAE1 inhibition mediates the unfolded protein response,DNA damage and caspase-dependent cell death in pancreatic cancer

The Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) plays a key role in the adaptive response to loss of protein homeostasis within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The UPR has an adaptive function in protein homeostasis, however, sustained activation of the UPR due to hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, and increased demand for protein synthesis, alters the UPR program such that additional perturbation of ER homeostasis activates a pro-apoptotic program. Since ubiquitination followed by proteasomal degradation of misfolded proteins within the ER is a central mechanism for restoration of ER homeostasis, inhibitors of this pathway have proven to be valuable anti-cancer therapeutics. Ubiquitin activating enzyme 1(UAE1), activates ubiquitin for transfer to target proteins for proteasomal degradation in conjunction with E2 and E3 enzymes. Inhibition of UAE1 activity in response to TAK-243, leads to an accumulation of misfolded proteins within the ER, thereby aggravating ER stress, leading to DNA damage and arrest of cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Persistent drug treatment mediates a robust induction of apoptosis following a transient cell cycle arrest. These biological effects of TAK-243 were recapitulated in mouse models of PDAC demonstrating antitumor activity at a dose and schedule that did not exhibit obvious normal tissue toxicity. In vitro as well as studies in mouse models failed to show enhanced efficacy when TAK-243 was combined with ionizing radiation or gemcitabine, providing an impetus for future studies to identify agents that synergize with this class of agents for improved tumor control in PDAC.SignificanceThe UAE1 inhibitor TAK-243, mediates activation of the unfolded protein response, accumulation of DNA breaks and apoptosis, providing a rationale for the use as a safe and efficacious anti-cancer therapeutic for PDAC.     

未折叠蛋白响应的激活机制

未折叠蛋白在内质网（endoplasmic reticulum,ER）腔中累积造成ER应激，此时细胞启动未折叠蛋白响应（unfolded protein response,UPR）以恢复蛋白质稳态。目前已知有三种UPR感受器，即IRE1、PERK和ATF6，它们均为ER跨膜蛋白，在ER应激时被激活并启动下游UPR信号通路。虽然UPR感受器最早是在研究细胞如何应对ER应激时发现的，但它们如何感知ER应激至今未得到完满的回答。随着研究的深入，人们发现UPR的功能不仅限于维持蛋白质稳态，而UPR感受器也不是只对未折叠蛋白累积作出响应。本文对UPR的发现及其经典通路作一介绍，着重阐述目前已知的UPR感受器的激活机制，并就UPR和ER应激关系以及该领域存在的问题进行讨论。     

The role of MAPK signalling pathways in the response to endoplasmic reticulum stress

Perturbations in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) homeostasis, including depletion of Ca^2 + or altered redox status, induce ER stress due to protein accumulation, misfolding and oxidation. This activates the unfolded protein response (UPR) to re-establish the balance between ER protein folding capacity and protein load, resulting in cell survival or, following chronic ER stress, promotes cell death. The mechanisms for the transition between adaptation to ER stress and ER stress-induced cell death are still being understood. However, the identification of numerous points of cross-talk between the UPR and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathways may contribute to our understanding of the consequences of ER stress. Indeed, the MAPK signalling network is known to regulate cell cycle progression and cell survival or death responses following a variety of stresses. In this article, we review UPR signalling and the activation of MAPK signalling pathways in response to ER stress. In addition, we highlight components of the UPR that are modulated in response to MAPK signalling and the consequences of this cross-talk. We also describe several diseases, including cancer, type II diabetes and retinal degeneration, where activation of the UPR and MAPK signalling contribute to disease progression and highlight potential avenues for therapeutic intervention. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Calcium Signaling In Health and Disease. Guest Editors: Geert Bultynck, Jacques Haiech, Claus W. Heizmann, Joachim Krebs, and Marc Moreau.     

Effect of the unfolded protein response on ER protein export: a potential new mechanism to relieve ER stress

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is an adaptive cellular response that aims to relieve endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress via several mechanisms, including inhibition of protein synthesis and enhancement of protein folding and degradation. There is a controversy over the effect of the UPR on ER protein export. While some investigators suggested that ER export is inhibited during ER stress, others suggested the opposite. In this article, their conflicting studies are analyzed and compared in attempt to solve this controversy. The UPR appears indeed to enhance ER export, possibly via multiple mechanisms. However, another factor, which is the integrity of the folding machinery/environment inside ER, determines whether ER export will appear increased or decreased during experimentation. Also, different methods of stress induction appear to have different effects on ER export. Thus, improvement of ER export may represent a new mechanism by which the UPR alleviates ER stress. This may help researchers to understand how the UPR works inside cells and how to manipulate it to alter cell fate during stress, either to promote cell survival or death. This may open up new approaches for the treatment of ER stress-related diseases.     

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) induces the unfolded protein response (UPR) in a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent fashion, and the UPR counteracts ROS accumulation by TNFalpha

Accumulation of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) causes ER overload, resulting in ER stress. To cope with ER stress, mammalian cells trigger a specific response known as the unfolded protein response (UPR). Although recent studies have indicated cross-talk between ER stress and oxidative stress, the mechanistic link is not fully understood. By using murine fibrosarcoma L929 cells, in which tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha induces accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cell death, we show that TNFalpha induces the UPR in a ROS-dependent fashion. In contrast to TNFalpha, oxidative stresses by H2O2 or arsenite only induce eukaroytic initiation factor 2alpha phosphorylation, but not activation of PERK- or IRE1-dependent pathways, indicating the specificity of downstream signaling induced by various oxidative stresses. Conversely, the UPR induced by tunicamycin substantially suppresses TNFalpha-induced ROS accumulation and cell death by inhibiting reduction of cellular glutathione levels. Collectively, some, but not all, oxidative stresses induce the UPR, and pre-emptive UPR counteracts TNFalpha-induced ROS accumulation.     

HSP105 interacts with GRP78 and GSK3 and promotes ER stress-induced caspase-3 activation

Stress of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER stress) is caused by the accumulation of misfolded proteins, which occurs in many neurodegenerative diseases. ER stress can lead to adaptive responses or apoptosis, both of which follow activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Heat shock proteins (HSP) support the folding and function of many proteins, and are important components of the ER stress response, but little is known about the role of one of the major large HSPs, HSP105. We identified several new partners of HSP105, including glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3), a promoter of ER stress-induced apoptosis, and GRP78, a key component of the UPR. Knockdown of HSP105 did not alter UPR signaling after ER stress, but blocked caspase-3 activation after ER stress. In contrast, caspase-3 activation induced by genotoxic stress was unaffected by knockdown of HSP105, suggesting ER stress-specificity in the apoptotic action of HSP105. However, knockdown of HSP105 did not alter cell survival after ER stress, but instead diverted signaling to a caspase-3-independent cell death pathway, indicating that HSP105 is necessary for apoptotic signaling after UPR activation by ER stress. Thus, HSP105 appears to chaperone the responses to ER stress through its interactions with GRP78 and GSK3, and without HSP105 cell death following ER stress proceeds by a non-caspase-3-dependent process.     

Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Aberrant Activation of Fluoride-Treated Osteoblasts

The aberrant activation of osteoblasts in the early stage is one of the critical steps during the pathogenesis of skeletal fluorosis. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stresses and unfolded protein response (UPR) are initiated to alleviate the accumulation of unfolded proteins against cell injury. The previous researches had demonstrated that fluoride induced ER stress in other cells or tissues. In this study, we determined the ER stress and UPR to investigate their roles in aberrant activation of fluoride-treated osteoblasts. The gene expression of bone markers and UPR factors in MC3T3-E1 cells treated with varying doses of fluoride administration was analyzed. Meantime, levels of glutathione and glutathione disulfide were tested by the ultraperformance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry applications. Our results indicated that a certain dose and period of fluoride administration induced cell proliferation and differentiation, and Runx2 was involved in the regulation of osteoblastic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells. Increase trend of Runx2 expression was consistent with change of marker of ER stress. Fluoride caused ER stress and stimulated UPR during the process of osteoblast maturation, while oxidative stress was also active in the occurrence of ER stress. These data indicated that ER stress and UPR were possibly involved in the action of fluoride on osteoblasts.     

The endoplasmic reticulum stress response in immunity and autoimmunity

Many exogenous sources of stress can lead to cell death. In recent years, endogenous cellular sources of stress have also been identified, including the stress that arises from the accumulation of unfolded proteins within a cell's endoplasmic reticulum (ER). To counterbalance this type of ER stress, higher eukaryotic cells possess a three-pronged signal-transduction pathway termed the unfolded-protein response (UPR). This Review focuses on the role of the UPR in the mammalian immune system and how manipulation of this complex signalling pathway may be of therapeutic benefit in human disease.     

The cargo receptor ERGIC-53 is a target of the unfolded protein response

The accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER triggers a signaling response known as unfolded protein response (UPR). In yeast the UPR affects several hundred genes that encode ER chaperones and proteins operating at later stages of secretion. In mammalian cells the UPR appears to be more limited to chaperones of the ER and genes assumed to be important after cell recovery from ER stress that are not important for secretion. Here, we report that the mRNA of lectin ERGIC-53, a cargo receptor for the transport of glycoproteins from ER to ERGIC, and of its related protein VIP36 is induced by the known inducers of ER stress, tunicamycin and thapsigargin. In parallel, the rate of synthesis of the ERGIC-53 protein was induced by these agents. The response was due to the UPR since it was also triggered by castanospermine, a specific inducer of UPR, and inhibited by genistein. Thapsigargin-induced upregulation of ERGIC-53 could be fully accounted for by the ATF6 pathway of UPR. The results suggest that in mammalian cells the UPR also affects traffic from and beyond the ER.     

内质网应激响应在脂肪组织中的代谢调节作用

在真核细胞中,内质网是蛋白合成、加工及质量监控的关键细胞器,也是Ca2+储存及脂质合成的重要场所.细胞通过未折叠蛋白响应(unfolded protein response,UPR)感应外界不同刺激引发的内质网应激,在维持细胞功能稳态中发挥至关重要的作用.在哺乳动物中,三个位于内质网的跨膜蛋白——肌醇依赖酶la(ino...     

Unfolded proteins and endoplasmic reticulum stress in neurodegenerative disorders

The stimuli for neuronal cell death in neurodegenerative disorders are multi-factorial and may include genetic predisposition, environmental factors, cellular stressors such as oxidative stress and free radical production, bioenergy failure, glutamate-induced excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation, disruption of Ca(2+) -regulating systems, mitochondrial dysfunction and misfolded protein accumulation. Cellular stress disrupts functioning of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), a critical organelle for protein quality control, leading to induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR). ER stress may contribute to neurodegeneration in a range of neurodegenerative disorders. This review summarizes the molecular events occurring during ER stress and the unfolded protein response and it specifically evaluates the evidence suggesting the ER stress response plays a role in neurodegenerative disorders.     

Intrinsic capacities of molecular sensors of the unfolded protein response to sense alternate forms of endoplasmic reticulum stress

The unfolded protein response (UPR) regulates the protein-folding capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) according to cellular demand. In mammalian cells, three ER transmembrane components, IRE1, PERK, and ATF6, initiate distinct UPR signaling branches. We show that these UPR components display distinct sensitivities toward different forms of ER stress. ER stress induced by ER Ca2+ release in particular revealed fundamental differences in the properties of UPR signaling branches. Compared with the rapid response of both IRE1 and PERK to ER stress induced by thapsigargin, an ER Ca2+ ATPase inhibitor, the response of ATF6 was markedly delayed. These studies are the first side-by-side comparisons of UPR signaling branch activation and reveal intrinsic features of UPR stress sensor activation in response to alternate forms of ER stress. As such, they provide initial groundwork toward understanding how ER stress sensors can confer different responses and how optimal UPR responses are achieved in physiological settings.