Tn10 transpososome assembly involves a folded intermediate that must be unfolded for target capture and strand transfer

Tn10 transposition, like all transposition reactions examined thus far, involves assembly of a stable protein-DNA transpososome, containing a pair of transposon ends, within which all chemical events occur. We report here that stable Tn10 pre-cleavage transpososomes occur in two conformations: a folded form which contains the DNA-bending factor IHF and an unfolded form which lacks IHF. Functional analysis shows that both forms undergo double strand cleavage at the transposon ends but that only the unfolded form is competent for target capture (and thus for strand transfer to target DNA). Additional studies reveal that formation of any type of stable transpososome, folded or unfolded, requires not only IHF but also non-specific transposase-DNA contacts immediately internal to the IHF-binding site, implying the occurrence of a topo- logically closed loop at the transposon end. Overall, transpososome assembly must proceed via a folded intermediate which, however, must be unfolded in order for intermolecular transposition to occur. These and other results support key features of a recently proposed model for transpososome assembly and morphogenesis.     

The nucleoid binding protein H-NS acts as an anti-channeling factor to favor intermolecular Tn10 transposition and dissemination

Dissemination of the bacterial transposon Tn10 is limited by target site channeling, a process wherein the transposon ends are forced to interact with and insert into a target site located within the transposon. Integration host factor (IHF) promotes this self-destructive event by binding to the transpososome and forming a DNA loop close to one or both transposon ends; this loop imposes geometric and topological constraints that are responsible for channeling. We demonstrate that a second ‘host’ protein, histone-like nucleoid structuring protein (H-NS), acts as an anti-channeling factor to limit self-destructive intramolecular transposition events in vitro. Evidence that H-NS competes with IHF for binding to the Tn10 transpososome to block channeling and that this event is relatively insensitive to the level of DNA supercoiling present in the Tn10-containing substrate plasmid are presented. This latter observation is atypical for H-NS, as H-NS binding to other DNA sequences, such as promoters, is generally affected by subtle changes in DNA structure.     

IHF-independent assembly of the Tn10 strand transfer transpososome: implications for inhibition of disintegration

The frequency of DNA transposition in transposition systems that employ a strand transfer step may be significantly affected by the occurrence of a disintegration reaction, a reaction that reverses the strand transfer event. We have asked whether disintegration occurs in the Tn10 transposition system. We show that disintegration substrates (substrates constituting one half of the strand transfer product) are assembled into a transpososome that mimics the strand transfer intermediate. This strand transfer transpososome (STT) does appear to support an intermolecular disintegration reaction, but only at a very low level. Strikingly, assembly of the STT is not dependent on IHF, a host protein that is required for de novo assembly of all previously characterized Tn10 transpososomes. We suggest that disintegration substrates are able to form both transposon end and target type contacts with transposase because of their enhanced conformational flexibility. This probably allows the conformation of DNA within the complex that prevents the destructive disintegration reaction, and is responsible for relaxing the DNA sequence requirements for STT formation relative to other Tn10 transpososomes.     

Characteristics of MuA transposase-catalyzed processing of model transposon end DNA hairpin substrates

Bacteriophage Mu uses non-replicative transposition for integration into the host's chromosome and replicative transposition for phage propagation. Biochemical and structural comparisons together with evolutionary considerations suggest that the Mu transposition machinery might share functional similarities with machineries of the systems that are known to employ a hairpin intermediate during the catalytic steps of transposition. Model transposon end DNA hairpin substrates were used in a minimal-component in vitro system to study their proficiency to promote Mu transpososome assembly and subsequent MuA-catalyzed chemical reactions leading to the strand transfer product. MuA indeed was able to assemble hairpin substrates into a catalytically competent transpososome, open the hairpin ends and accurately join the opened ends to the target DNA. The hairpin opening and transposon end cleavage reactions had identical metal ion preferences, indicating similar conformations within the catalytic center for these reactions. Hairpin length influenced transpososome assembly as well as catalysis: longer loops were more efficient in these respects. In general, MuA's proficiency to utilize different types of hairpin substrates indicates a certain degree of flexibility within the transposition machinery core. Overall, the results suggest that non-replicative and replicative transposition systems may structurally and evolutionarily be more closely linked than anticipated previously.     

Reorganization of the Mu transpososome active sites during a cooperative transition between DNA cleavage and joining

Transposition of mobile genetic elements proceeds through a series of DNA phosphoryl transfer reactions, with multiple reaction steps catalyzed by the same set of active site residues. Mu transposase repeatedly utilizes the same active site DDE residues to cleave and join a single DNA strand at each transposon end to a new, distant DNA location (the target DNA). To better understand how DNA is manipulated within the Mu transposase-DNA complex during recombination, the impact of the DNA immediately adjacent to the Mu DNA ends (the flanking DNA) on the progress of transposition was investigated. We show that, in the absence of the MuB activator, the 3 '-flanking strand can slow one or more steps between DNA cleavage and joining. The presence of this flanking DNA strand in just one active site slows the joining step in both active sites. Further evidence suggests that this slow step is not due to a change in the affinity of the transpososome for the target DNA. Finally, we demonstrate that MuB activates transposition by stimulating the reaction step between cleavage and joining that is otherwise slowed by this flanking DNA strand. Based on these results, we propose that the 3 '-flanking DNA strand must be removed from, or shifted within, both active sites after the cleavage step; this movement is coupled to a conformational change within the transpososome that properly positions the target DNA simultaneously within both active sites and thereby permits joining.     

Enhancement and rescue of target capture in Tn10 transposition by site-specific modifications in target DNA

The bacterial transposon Tn10 inserts preferentially into specific target sequences. This insertion specificity appears to be linked to the ability of target sites to adopt symmetrically positioned DNA bends after binding the transposition machinery. Target DNA bending is thought to permit the transposase protein to make additional contacts with the target DNA, thereby stabilizing the target complex so that the joining of transposon and target DNA sequences can occur efficiently. In the current work, we have asked whether the introduction of a discontinuity in a target DNA strand, a modification that is expected to make it easier for a DNA molecule to bend, can enhance or rescue target capture under otherwise suboptimal reaction conditions. We show that either a nick or a missing phosphate specifically at the site of reaction chemistry increases the ability of various target DNAs to form the target capture complex. The result suggests that the bends in the target DNA are highly localized and include the scissile phosphates. This raises the possibility that strand transfer is mechanistically linked to target capture. We have also identified specific residues in the target DNA and in transposase that appear to play an important role in target DNA bending.     

Tn5 as a model for understanding DNA transposition

Tn5 is an excellent model system for understanding the molecular basis of DNA-mediated transposition. Mechanistic information has come from genetic and biochemical investigations of the transposase and its interactions with the recognition DNA sequences at the ends of the transposon. More recently, molecular structure analyses of catalytically active transposase; transposon DNA complexes have provided us with unprecedented insights into this transposition system. Transposase initiates transposition by forming a dimeric transposase, transposon DNA complex. In the context of this complex, the transposase then catalyses four phosphoryl transfer reactions (DNA nicking, DNA hairpin formation, hairpin resolution and strand transfer into target DNA) resulting in the integration of the transposon into its new DNA site. The studies that elucidated these steps also provided important insights into the integration of retroviral genomes into host DNA and the immune system V(D)J joining process. This review will describe the structures and steps involved in Tn5 transposition and point out a biologically important although surprising characteristic of the wild-type Tn5 transposase. Transposase is a very inactive protein. An inactive transposase protein ensures the survival of the host and thus the survival of Tn5.     

Tn7 transposition in vitro proceeds through an excised transposon intermediate generated by staggered breaks in DNA.

We have developed a cell-free system in which the bacterial transposon Tn7 inserts at high frequency into its preferred target site in the Escherichia coli chromosome, attTn7; Tn7 transposition in vitro requires ATP and Tn7-encoded proteins. Tn7 transposes via a cut and paste mechanism in which the element is excised from the donor DNA by staggered double-strand breaks and then inserted into attTn7 by the joining of 3' transposon ends to 5' target ends. Neither recombination intermediates nor products are observed in the absence of any protein component or DNA substrate. Thus, we suggest that Tn7 transposition occurs in a nucleoprotein complex containing several proteins and the substrate DNAs and that recognition of attTn7 within this complex provokes strand cleavages at the Tn7 ends.     

Architecture of the Tn7 Posttransposition Complex: An Elaborate Nucleoprotein Structure

Four transposition proteins encoded by the bacterial transposon Tn7, TnsA, TnsB, TnsC, and TnsD, mediate its site- and orientation-specific insertion into the chromosomal site attTn7. To establish which Tns proteins are actually present in the transpososome that executes DNA breakage and joining, we have determined the proteins present in the nucleoprotein product of transposition, the posttransposition complex (PTC), using fluorescently labeled Tns proteins. All four required Tns proteins are present in the PTC in which we also find that the Tn7 ends are paired by protein-protein contacts between Tns proteins bound to the ends. Quantification of the relative amounts of the fluorescent Tns proteins in the PTC indicates that oligomers of TnsA, TnsB, and TnsC mediate Tn7 transposition. High-resolution DNA footprinting of the DNA product of transposition attTn7∷Tn7 revealed that about 350 bp of DNA on the transposon ends and on attTn7 contact the Tns proteins. All seven binding sites for TnsB, the component of the transposase that specifically binds the ends and mediates 3′ end breakage and joining, are occupied in the PTC. However, the protection pattern of the sites closest to the Tn7 ends in the PTC are different from that observed with TnsB alone, likely reflecting the pairing of the ends and their interaction with the target nucleoprotein complex necessary for activation of the breakage and joining steps. We also observe extensive protection of the attTn7 sequences in the PTC and that alternative DNA structures in substrate attTn7 that are imposed by TnsD are maintained in the PTC.     

The Tn7 transposase is a heteromeric complex in which DNA breakage and joining activities are distributed between different gene products.

The bacterial transposon Tn7 translocates by a cut and paste mechanism: excision from the donor site results from double-strand breaks at each end of Tn7 and target insertion results from joining of the exposed 3'' Tn7 tips to the target DNA. Through site-directed mutagenesis of the Tn7-encoded transposition proteins TnsA and TnsB, we demonstrate that the Tn7 transposase is a heteromeric complex of these proteins, each protein executing different DNA processing reactions. TnsA mediates DNA cleavage reactions at the 5'' ends of Tn7, and TnsB mediates DNA breakage and joining reactions at the 3'' ends of Tn7. Thus the double-strand breaks that underlie Tn7 excision result from a collaboration between two active sites, one in TnsA and one in TnsB; the same (or a closely related) active site in TnsB also mediates the subsequent joining of the 3'' ends to the target. Both TnsA and TnsB appear to be members of the retroviral integrase superfamily: mutation of their putative DD(35)E motifs blocks catalytic activity. Recombinases of this class require a divalent metal cofactor that is thought to interact with these acidic residues. Through analysis of the metal ion specificity of a TnsA mutant containing a sulfur (cysteine) substitution, we provide evidence that a divalent metal actually interacts with these acidic amino acids.     

Mechanisms of metal ion action in Tn10 transposition

Tn10/IS10 transposition involves assembly of a synaptic complex (or transpososome) in which two transposon ends are paired, followed by four distinct chemical steps at each transposon end. The chemical steps are dependent on the presence of a suitable divalent metal cation (Me(2+)). Transpososome assembly and structure are also affected by Me(2+). To gain further insight into the mechanisms of Me(2+) action in Tn10/IS10 transposition we have investigated the effects of substituting Mn(2+) for Mg(2+), the physiologic Me(2+), in transposition. We have also investigated the significance of an Me(2+)-assisted conformational change in transpososome structure. We show that Mn(2+) has two previously unrecognized effects on the Tn10 donor cleavage reaction. It accelerates the rates of hairpin formation and hairpin resolution without significantly affecting the rate of the first chemical step, first strand nicking. Mn(2+) also relaxes the specificity of first strand nicking. We also show that Me(2+)-assisted transpososome unfolding coincides with a structural transition in the transposon-donor junction that may be necessary for hairpin formation. Possible mechanisms for these observations are considered.     

Kinetic and structural analysis of a cleaved donor intermediate and a strand transfer intermediate in Tn10 transposition.

Tn10 transposes by a nonreplicative "cut and paste" mechanism. We describe here two protein-DNA complexes that are reaction intermediates in the Tn10 transposition process: a cleaved donor complex whose DNA component consists of transposon sequences cleanly excised from flanking donor DNA, and a strand transfer complex whose DNA component contains transposon termini specifically joined to a target site. The kinetic behavior of the first species suggests that it is an early intermediate in the transposition reaction. These two Tn10 complexes are closely analogous to complexes identified in the pathway for replicative "cointegrate" formation by bacteriophage Mu and thus represent intermediates that may be common to both nonreplicative and replicative transposition. These and other results suggest that the Tn10 and Mu reactions are fundamentally very similar despite their very different biological outcomes. The critical difference between the two reactions is the fate of the DNA strand that is not joined to target DNA.     

Single active site catalysis of the successive phosphoryl transfer steps by DNA transposases: insights from phosphorothioate stereoselectivity

The transposase family of proteins mediate DNA transposition or retroviral DNA integration via multistep phosphoryl transfer reactions. For Tn10 and phage Mu, a single active site of one transposase protomer catalyzes the successive transposition reaction steps. We examined phosphorothioate stereoselectivity at the scissile position for all four reaction steps catalyzed by the Tn10 transposase. The results suggest that the first three steps required for double-strand cutting at the transposon end proceed as a succession of pseudo-reverse reaction steps while the 3' end of the transposon remains bound to the same side of the active site. However, the mode of substrate binding to the active site changes for the cut transposon 3' end to target DNA strand joining. The phosphorothioate stereoselectivity of the corresponding steps of phage Mu transposition and HIV DNA integration matches that of Tn10 reaction, indicating a common mode of substrate-active site interactions for this class of DNA transposition reactions.     

A unique right end-enhancer complex precedes synapsis of Mu ends: the enhancer is sequestered within the transpososome throughout transposition

Assembly of the Mu transpososome is dependent on interactions of transposase subunits with the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu and an enhancer (E). We have followed the order and dynamics of association of these sites within a series of transpososomes prior to and during formation of a three-site complex (LER), engagement of Mu ends by the transposase active site (type 0 complex), cleavage of the ends (type I complex) and their transfer to target DNA (type II complex). LER appears to be preceded by a two-site complex (ER) where E and R are interwrapped twice, as in the mature transpososome. At each stage thereafter, the overall topology of five DNA supercoils is retained: two between E and R, one between E and L and two between L and R. However, L-R interactions within LER appear to be flexible. Unexpectedly, the enhancer was seen to persist within the transpososome through cleavage and strand transfer of Mu ends to target DNA.     

H-NS mediates the dissociation of a refractory protein-DNA complex during Tn10/IS10 transposition

Tn10/IS10 transposition takes place in the context of a protein-DNA complex called a transpososome. During the reaction, the transpososome undergoes several conformational changes. The host proteins IHF and H-NS, which also are global regulators of gene expression, play important roles in directing these architectural changes. IHF binds tightly to only one of two transposon ends within the transpososome, folding this end into a DNA loop structure. Unfolding this DNA loop is necessary for excising the transposon from flanking donor DNA and preventing integration of the transposon into itself. We show here that efficient DNA loop unfolding relies on the continuity of the flanking donor DNA on the side of the transpososome opposite to the folded transposon end. We also show this same donor DNA is a preferred binding site for H-NS, which promotes opening of the IHF-loop, which is required for productive target interactions. This is counter to the usual mode of H-NS action, which is repressive due to its propensity to coat DNA. The interplay between IHF and H-NS likely serves to couple the rate of transposition to the host cell physiology as both of these proteins are integrated into cellular stress response pathways.     

IS10/Tn10 transposition efficiently accommodates diverse transposon end configurations.

Transposon Tn10 and its component insertion sequence IS10 move by non-replicative transposition. We have studied the array of reaction intermediates and products in a high efficiency in vitro IS10/Tn10 transposition reaction. Synapsis of two transposon ends, followed by cleavage and strand transfer, can occur very efficiently irrespective of the relative locations and orientations of the two ends. The two participating ends can occur in inverted or direct orientation on the same molecule or, most importantly, on two different molecules. This behavior contrasts sharply with that of Mu, in which transposition is strongly biased in favor of inverted repeat synapsis. Mechanistically, the absence of discrimination amongst various end configurations implies that the architecture within the IS10/Tn10 synaptic complex is relatively simple, i.e. lacking any significant intertwining of component DNA strands. Biologically these observations are important because they suggest that the IS10 insertion sequence module has considerable flexibility in the types of DNA rearrangements that it can promote. Most importantly, it now seems highly probable that a single non-replicative IS10 element can promote DNA rearrangements usually attributed to replicative transposition, i.e. adjacent deletions and cointegrates, by utilizing transposon ends on two sister chromosomes. Other events which probably also contribute to the diversity of IS10/Tn10-promoted rearrangements are discussed.     

Promiscuous target interactions in the mariner transposon Himar1

We have previously characterized the early intermediates of mariner transposition. Here we characterize the target interactions that occur later in the reaction. We find that, in contrast to the early transposition intermediates, the strand transfer complex is extremely stable and difficult to disassemble. Transposase is tightly bound to the transposon ends constraining rotation of the DNA at the single strand gaps in the target site flanking the element on either side. We also find that although the cleavage step requires Mg2+ or Mn2+ as cofactor, the strand transfer step is also supported by Ca2+, suggesting that the structure of the active site changes between cleavage and insertion. Finally, we show that, in contrast to the bacterial cut and paste transposons, mariner target interactions are promiscuous and can take place either before or after cleavage of the flanking DNA. This is similar to the behavior of the V(D)J system, which is believed to be derived from an ancestral eukaryotic transposon. We discuss the implications of promiscuous target interactions for promoting local transposition and whether this is an adaptation to facilitate the invasion of a genome following horizontal transfer to a new host species.     

In vitro transposition of ISY100, a bacterial insertion sequence belonging to the Tc1/mariner family

The Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 insertion sequence ISY100 (ISTcSa) belongs to the Tc1/mariner/IS630 family of transposable elements. ISY100 transposase was purified and shown to promote transposition in vitro. Transposase binds specifically to ISY100 terminal inverted repeat sequences via an N-terminal DNA-binding domain containing two helix-turn-helix motifs. Transposase is the only protein required for excision and integration of ISY100. Transposase made double-strand breaks on a supercoiled DNA molecule containing a mini-ISY100 transposon, cleaving exactly at the transposon 3' ends and two nucleotides inside the 5' ends. Cleavage of short linear substrates containing a single transposon end was less precise. Transposase also catalysed strand transfer, covalently joining the transposon 3' end to the target DNA. When a donor plasmid carrying a mini-ISY100 was incubated with a target plasmid and transposase, the most common products were insertions of one transposon end into the target DNA, but insertions of both ends at a single target site could be recovered after transformation into Escherichia coli. Insertions were almost exclusively into TA dinucleotides, and the target TA was duplicated on insertion. Our results demonstrate that there are no fundamental differences between the transposition mechanisms of IS630 family elements in bacteria and Tc1/mariner elements in higher eukaryotes.     

Substrate recognition and induced DNA deformation by transposase at the target-capture stage of Tn10 transposition

The bacterial transposon Tn10 inserts preferentially into sites that conform to a 9 bp consensus sequence: 5' NGCTNAGCN 3'. However, this sequence is not on its own sufficient to confer target specificity as the base-pairs flanking this sequence also contribute significantly to target-site selection. We have performed a series of "contact-probing experiments" to define directly the protein-DNA interactions that govern target-site selection in the Tn10 system. The HisG1 hotspot for Tn10 insertion was the main focus here. We infer that there is a rather broad zone ( approximately 24 bp) of contact between transposase and target DNA in the target-capture complex. This includes base-specific contacts at all of the purine residues in the consensus positions of the target core and primarily backbone contacts out to 7-8 bp in the two flanking regions immediately adjacent to the core. Also, highly localized sites of chemical hypersensitivity are identified that reveal symmetrically disposed deformations in DNA structure in the target-capture complex. Furthermore, the level of strand transfer is shown to be reduced by phosphorothioate substitution of phosphate groups at or close to the sites of target DNA deformation. Interestingly, for one particular target DNA, a mutant form of HisG1 called MutF, the above phosphorothioate inhibition of strand transfer is suppressed by replacing Mg(2+) with Mn(2+). Based on these results a model for sequence-specific target capture is proposed which attempts to define possible relationships between transposase interactions with the target core and flanking sequences, transposase-induced DNA deformation of the target site and divalent metal ion binding to the target-capture complex.