A dissection of the protein-protein interfaces in icosahedral virus capsids

We selected 49 icosahedral virus capsids whose crystal structures are reported in the Protein Data Bank. They belong to the T=1, T=3, pseudo T=3 and other lattice types. We identified in them 779 unique interfaces between pairs of subunits, all repeated by icosahedral symmetry. We analyzed the geometric and physical chemical properties of these interfaces and compared with interfaces in protein-protein complexes and homodimeric proteins, and with crystal packing contacts. The capsids contain one to 16 subunits implicated in three to 66 unique interfaces. Each subunit loses 40-60% of its accessible surface in contacts with an average of 8.5 neighbors. Many of the interfaces are very large with a buried surface area (BSA) that can exceed 10,000 A(2), yet 39% are small with a BSA<800 A(2) comparable to crystal packing contacts. Pairwise capsid interfaces overlap, so that one-third of the residues are part of more than one interface. Those with a BSA>800 A(2) resemble homodimer interfaces in their chemical composition. Relative to the protein surface, they are non-polar, enriched in aliphatic residues and depleted of charged residues, but not of neutral polar residues. They contain one H-bond per about 200 A(2) BSA. Small capsid interfaces (BSA<800 A(2)) are only slightly more polar. They have a similar amino acid composition, but they bury fewer atoms and contain fewer H-bonds for their size. Geometric parameters that estimate the quality of the atomic packing suggest that the small capsid interfaces are loosely packed like crystal packing contacts, whereas the larger interfaces are close-packed as in protein-protein complexes and homodimers. We discuss implications of these findings on the mechanism of capsid assembly, assuming that the larger interfaces form first to yield stable oligomeric species (capsomeres), and that medium-size interfaces allow the stepwise addition of capsomeres to build larger intermediates.     

Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins

The solvent-accessible surface area (As) of 23 oligomeric proteins is calculated using atomic co-ordinates from high-resolution and well-refined crystal structures. As is correlated with the protein molecular weight, and a power law predicts its value to within 5% on average. The accessible surface of the average oligomer is similar to that of monomeric proteins in its hydropathy and amino acid composition. The distribution of the 20 amino acid types between the protein surface and its interior is also the same as in monomers. Interfaces, i.e. surfaces involved in subunit contacts, differ from the rest of the subunit surface. They are enriched in hydrophobic side-chains, yet they contain a number of charged groups, especially from Arg residues, which are the most abundant residues at interfaces except for Leu. Buried Arg residues are involved in H-bonds between subunits. We counted H-bonds at interfaces and found that several have none, others have one H-bond per 200 A2 of interface area on average (1 A = 0.1 nm). A majority of interface H-bonds involve charged donor or acceptor groups, which should make their contribution to the free energy of dissociation significant, even when they are few. The smaller interfaces cover about 700 A2 of the subunit surface. The larger ones cover 3000 to 10,000 A2, up to 40% of the subunit surface area in catalase. The lower value corresponds to an estimate of the accessible surface area loss required for stabilizing subunit association through the hydrophobic effect alone. Oligomers with small interfaces have globular subunits with accessible surface areas similar to those of monomeric proteins. We suggest that these oligomers assemble from preformed monomers with little change in conformation. In oligomers with large interfaces, isolated subunits should be unstable given their excessively large accessible surface, and assembly is expected to require major structural changes.     

Protein domain interfaces: characterization and comparison with oligomeric protein interfaces

The physical and chemical properties of domain-domain interactions have been analysed in two-domain proteins selected from the protein classification, CATH. The two-domain structures were divided into those derived from (i) monomeric proteins, or (ii) oligomeric or complexed proteins. The size, polarity, hydrogen bonding and packing of the intra-chain domain interface were calculated for both sets of two-domain structures. The results were compared with inter-chain interface parameters from permanent and non-obligate protein-protein complexes. In general, the intra-chain domain and inter-chain interfaces were remarkably similar. Many of the intra-chain interface properties are intermediate between those calculated for permanent and non-obligate inter-chain complexes. Residue interface propensities were also found to be very similar, with hydrophobic residues playing a major role, together with positively charged arginine residues. In addition, the residue composition of the domain interfaces were found to be more comparable with domain surfaces than domain cores. The implications of these results for domain swapping and protein folding are discussed.     

Extent and nature of contacts between protein molecules in crystal lattices and between subunits of protein oligomers

A survey was compiled of several characteristics of the intersubunit contacts in 58 oligomeric proteins, and of the intermolecular contacts in the lattice for 223 protein crystal structures. The total number of atoms in contact and the secondary structure elements involved are similar in the two types of interfaces. Crystal contact patches are frequently smaller than patches involved in oligomer interfaces. Crystal contacts result from more numerous interactions by polar residues, compared with a tendency toward nonpolar amino acids at oligomer interfaces. Arginine is the only amino acid prominent in both types of interfaces. Potentials of mean force for residue–residue contacts at both crystal and oligomer interfaces were derived from comparison of the number of observed residue–residue interactions with the number expected by mass action. They show that hydrophobic interactions at oligomer interfaces favor aromatic amino acids and methionine over aliphatic amino acids; and that crystal contacts form in such a way as to avoid inclusion of hydrophobic interactions. They also suggest that complex salt bridges with certain amino acid compositions might be important in oligomer formation. For a protein that is recalcitrant to crystallization, substitution of lysine residues with arginine or glutamine is a recommended strategy. Proteins 28:494–514, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces

We compare the geometric and physical-chemical properties of interfaces involved in specific and non-specific protein-protein interactions in crystal structures reported in the Protein Data Bank. Specific interactions are illustrated by 70 protein-protein complexes and by subunit contacts in 122 homodimeric proteins; non-specific interactions are illustrated by 188 pairs of monomeric proteins making crystal-packing contacts selected to bury more than 800 A2 of protein surface. A majority of these pairs have 2-fold symmetry and form "crystal dimers" that cannot be distinguished from real dimers on the basis of the interface size or symmetry. The chemical and amino acid compositions of the large crystal-packing interfaces resemble the protein solvent-accessible surface. These interfaces are less hydrophobic than in homodimers and contain much fewer fully buried atoms. We develop a residue propensity score and a hydrophobic interaction score to assess preferences seen in the chemical and amino acid compositions of the different types of interfaces, and we derive indexes to evaluate the atomic packing, which we find to be less compact at non-specific than at specific interfaces. We test the capacity of these parameters to identify homodimeric proteins in crystal structures, and show that a simple combination of the non-polar interface area and the fraction of buried interface atoms assigns the quaternary structure of 88% of the homodimers and 77% of the monomers in our data set correctly. These success rates increase to 93-95% when the residue propensity score of the interfaces is taken into consideration.     

Site-directed spin labeling study of subunit interactions in the alpha-crystallin domain of small heat-shock proteins. Comparison of the oligomer symmetry in alphaA-crystallin, HSP 27, and HSP 16.3

Site-directed spin labeling was used to investigate quaternary interactions along a conserved sequence in the alpha-crystallin domain of alphaA-crystallin, heat-shock protein 27 (HSP 27), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis heat-shock protein (HSP 16.3). In previous work, it was demonstrated that this sequence in alphaA-crystallin and HSP 27 forms a beta-strand involved in subunit contacts. In this study, the symmetry and geometry of the resulting interface were investigated. For this purpose, the pattern of spin-spin interactions was analyzed, and the number of interacting spins was determined in alphaA-crystallin and HSP 27. The results reveal a 2-fold symmetric interface consisting of two beta-strands interacting near their N termini in an antiparallel fashion. Remarkably, subunit interactions along this interface persist when the alpha-crystallin domains are expressed in isolation. Because this domain in alphaA-crystallin forms dimers and tetramers, it is inferred that interactions along this interface mediate the formation of a basic dimeric unit. In contrast, in HSP 16.3, spin-spin interactions are observed at only one site near the C terminus of the sequence. Furthermore, cysteine substitutions at residues flanking the N terminus resulted in the dissociation of the oligomeric structure. Analysis of the spin-spin interactions and size exclusion chromatography indicates a 3-fold symmetric interface. Taken together, our results demonstrate that subunit interactions in the alpha-crystallin domain of mammalian small heat-shock proteins assemble a basic building block of the oligomeric structure. Sequence divergence in this domain results in variations in the size and symmetry of the quaternary structure between distant members of the small heat-shock protein family.     

Amino acid substitutions at protein–protein interfaces that modulate the oligomeric state

Despite similarities in their sequence and structure, there are a number of homologous proteins that adopt various oligomeric states. Comparisons of these homologous protein pairs, in terms of residue substitutions at the protein–protein interfaces, have provided fundamental characteristics that describe how proteins interact with each other. We have prepared a dataset composed of pairs of related proteins with different homo‐oligomeric states. Using the protein complexes, the interface residues were identified, and using structural alignments, the shadow‐interface residues have been defined as the surface residues that align with the interface residues. Subsequently, we investigated residue substitutions between the interfaces and the shadow interfaces. Based on the degree of the contributions to the interactions, the aligned sites of the interfaces and shadow interfaces were divided into primary and secondary sites; the primary sites are the focus of this work. The primary sites were further classified into two groups (i.e. exposed and buried) based on the degree to which the residue is buried within the shadow interfaces. Using these classifications, two simple mechanisms that mediate the oligomeric states were identified. In the primary‐exposed sites, the residues on the shadow interfaces are replaced by more hydrophobic or aromatic residues, which are physicochemically favored at protein–protein interfaces. In the primary‐buried sites, the residues on the shadow interfaces are replaced by larger residues that protrude into other proteins. These simple rules are satisfied in 23 out of 25 Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) families with a different‐oligomeric‐state pair, and thus represent a basic strategy for modulating protein associations and dissociations. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Characterization of Protomer Interfaces in HslV Protease; the Bacterial Homologue of 20S Proteasome

HslVU, a two-component proteasome-related prokaryotic system is composed of HslV protease and HslU ATPase. HslV protomers assemble in a dodecamer of two-stacked hexameric rings that form a complex with HslU hexamers. The intra- and inter-ring protomer interfaces in the HslV dodecamer underpin the integrity and functionality of HslVU. Structural characterization of HslV from different bacteria illustrated considerable differences in interacting residues, accessible surface and gap volumes at the intra-ring interface that is primarily stabilized by polar interactions. Amino acid residues Lys28, Arg83 and Asp111 have envisaged as hot spots at this HslU-interacting interface. The inter-ring interfaces that are made up of side chain packing of hydrophobic residues are structurally conserved. Hyperthermostable bacterium T. maritima HslV has extensively networked polar/nonpolar interactions and highly packed environment at all interfaces. Present data demonstrates that HslV protomer interfaces perform distinct functions; whereas intra-ring interface participates in HslV:HslU interaction resulting in allosteric activation of HslV protease by HslU, the inter-ring interfaces uphold the oligomeric form of HslV.     

T4溶菌酶晶体分子堆积的研究

以不对称单位中只有一个分子的１０种不同晶型的Ｔ４溶菌酶晶体为材料,对晶体中的分子堆积进行了研究,结果表明,在溶剂含量较高的晶型中,非极性基团在接触面积中所占的比例略高于溶剂含量较低的晶型,而其极性和带电荷基团在接触面积中所占的比例略低于溶剂含量较低的晶型。溶剂含量较高的晶型多含有晶体学二重轴,二重轴相关的分子间的接触与其他接触相比,含有较少的极性相互作用。这些结果说明溶剂含量的高低可能是由不同结晶     

Structural adaptation to low temperatures--analysis of the subunit interface of oligomeric psychrophilic enzymes

Enzymes from psychrophiles show higher catalytic efficiency in the 0-20 degrees C temperature range and often lower thermostability in comparison with meso/thermophilic homologs. Physical and chemical characterization of these enzymes is currently underway in order to understand the molecular basis of cold adaptation. Psychrophilic enzymes are often characterized by higher flexibility, which allows for better interaction with substrates, and by a lower activation energy requirement in comparison with meso/thermophilic counterparts. In their tertiary structure, psychrophilic enzymes present fewer stabilizing interactions, longer and more hydrophilic loops, higher glycine content, and lower proline and arginine content. In this study, a comparative analysis of the structural characteristics of the interfaces between oligomeric psychrophilic enzyme subunits was carried out. Crystallographic structures of oligomeric psychrophilic enzymes, and their meso/thermophilic homologs belonging to five different protein families, were retrieved from the Protein Data Bank. The following structural parameters were calculated: overall and core interface area, characterization of polar/apolar contributions to the interface, hydrophobic contact area, quantity of ion pairs and hydrogen bonds between monomers, internal area and total volume of non-solvent-exposed cavities at the interface, and average packing of interface residues. These properties were compared to those of meso/thermophilic enzymes. The results were analyzed using Student's t-test. The most significant differences between psychrophilic and mesophilic proteins were found in the number of ion pairs and hydrogen bonds, and in the apolarity of their subunit interface. Interestingly, the number of ion pairs at the interface shows an opposite adaptation to those occurring at the monomer core and surface.     

Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces

We used a nonredundant set of 621 protein-protein interfaces of known high-resolution structure to derive residue composition and residue-residue contact preferences. The residue composition at the interfaces, in entire proteins and in whole genomes correlates well, indicating the statistical strength of the data set. Differences between amino acid distributions were observed for interfaces with buried surface area of less than 1,000 A(2) versus interfaces with area of more than 5,000 A(2). Hydrophobic residues were abundant in large interfaces while polar residues were more abundant in small interfaces. The largest residue-residue preferences at the interface were recorded for interactions between pairs of large hydrophobic residues, such as Trp and Leu, and the smallest preferences for pairs of small residues, such as Gly and Ala. On average, contacts between pairs of hydrophobic and polar residues were unfavorable, and the charged residues tended to pair subject to charge complementarity, in agreement with previous reports. A bootstrap procedure, lacking from previous studies, was used for error estimation. It showed that the statistical errors in the set of pairing preferences are generally small; the average standard error is approximately 0.2, i.e., about 8% of the average value of the pairwise index (2.9). However, for a few pairs (e.g., Ser-Ser and Glu-Asp) the standard error is larger in magnitude than the pairing index, which makes it impossible to tell whether contact formation is favorable or unfavorable. The results are interpreted using physicochemical factors and their implications for the energetics of complex formation and for protein docking are discussed. Proteins 2001;43:89-102.     

Does F1-ATPase subunit gamma turn in the wrong direction?

Analyzing the direction of F1-ATPase subunit gamma rotation, its shape and non-random distribution of surface residues, a mechanism is proposed for how gamma induces the closing/opening of the catalytic sites at beta/alpha interfaces: by keeping contact with the mobile domain of subunits beta at the 'jaw' (D386, the seven consecutive hydrophobic residues and D394/E395), rotating gamma works as a screw conveyer within the barrel of (alpha,beta)3. Mutations of the conveyer contacts are predicted to inhibit. Rotating wheel cartoons illustrate enzyme turnover and conformational changes. Steric clashes, polar interactions and also substrate limitations lead to specific stops. Because it is constructed as a stepper, gamma prevents uncoupling at high energy charge.     

Self-complementary motifs (SCM) in alpha-crystallin small heat shock proteins

Small heat shock proteins (sHsp) have been implicated in many cell processes involving the dynamics of protein-protein interactions. Two unusual sequences containing self-complementary motifs (SCM) have been identified within the conserved alpha-crystallin domain of sHsps. When two SCMs are aligned in an anti-parallel direction (N to C and C to N), the charged or polar residues form either salt bridges or hydrogen bonds while the non-polar residues participate in hydrophobic interactions. When aligned in reverse order, the residues of these motifs in alpha-crystallin subunits form either hydrophobic and/or polar interactions. Homology based molecular modeling of the C-terminal domain of alpha-crystallin subunits using the crystal structure of MjHSP16.5 suggests that SCM1 and 2 participate in stabilizing secondary structure and subunit interactions. Also there is overwhelming evidence that these motifs are important in the chaperone-like activity of alpha-crystallin subunits. These sequences are conserved and appear to be characteristic of the entire sHsp superfamily. Similar motifs are also present in the Hsp70 family and the immunoglobulin superfamily.     

Multiple distinct assemblies reveal conformational flexibility in the small heat shock protein Hsp26

Small heat shock proteins are a superfamily of molecular chaperones that suppress protein aggregation and provide protection from cell stress. A key issue for understanding their action is to define the interactions of subunit domains in these oligomeric assemblies. Cryo-electron microscopy of yeast Hsp26 reveals two distinct forms, each comprising 24 subunits arranged in a porous shell with tetrahedral symmetry. The subunits form elongated, asymmetric dimers that assemble via trimeric contacts. Modifications of both termini cause rearrangements that yield a further four assemblies. Each subunit contains an N-terminal region, a globular middle domain, the alpha-crystallin domain, and a C-terminal tail. Twelve of the C termini form 3-fold assembly contacts which are inserted into the interior of the shell, while the other 12 C termini form contacts on the surface. Hinge points between the domains allow a variety of assembly contacts, providing the flexibility required for formation of supercomplexes with non-native proteins.     

A survey of hemoglobin quaternary structures

We perform an analysis of the quaternary structure and dimer/dimer interface in the crystal structures of 165 human hemoglobin tetramers; 112 are in the T, 17 the R, 14 the Y (or R2) state; 11 are high-affinity T state mutants, and 11 may either be intermediates between the states, or off the allosteric transition pathway. The tertiary structure is fixed within each state, in spite of the different ligands, mutations, and chemical modifications present in individual entries. The geometry of the tetramer assembly is essentially the same in all the R or the Y state entries; it is slightly different in high salt and low salt crystals of T state hemoglobins. The dimer/dimer interface differs in terms of size, chemical composition and polar interactions, between the states. It is loosely packed, like crystal packing contacts or the subunit interface of weakly associated homodimers, and unlike most oligomeric proteins, which have close-packed interfaces. The loose packing is most obvious in the liganded forms, where the tetramer is known to dissociate at low concentration. We identify cavities that contribute to the loose packing of the α1β2 and α2β1 contacts. Two pairs of cavities occur recurrently in both the T and the R state tetramers. They may contribute to the allosteric mechanism by facilitating the subunit movements and the tertiary structure changes that accompany the transition from T to R to Y.     

Does F1-ATPase subunit γ turn in the wrong direction?

Analyzing the direction of F₁-ATPase subunit γ rotation, its shape and non-random distribution of surface residues, a mechanism is proposed for how γ induces the closing/opening of the catalytic sites at β/α interfaces: by keeping contact with the mobile domain of subunits β at the ‘jaw’ (D386, the seven consecutive hydrophobic residues and D394/E395), rotating γ works as a screw conveyer within the barrel of (α,β)₃. Mutations of the conveyer contacts are predicted to inhibit. Rotating wheel cartoons illustrate enzyme turnover and conformational changes. Steric clashes, polar interactions and also substrate limitations lead to specific stops. Because it is constructed as a stepper, γ prevents uncoupling at high energy charge.     

CRK: An evolutionary approach for distinguishing biologically relevant interfaces from crystal contacts

Protein crystals contain two different types of interfaces: biologically relevant ones, observed in protein–protein complexes and oligomeric proteins, and nonspecific ones, corresponding to crystal lattice contacts. Because of the increasing complexity of the objects being tackled in structural biology, distinguishing biological contacts from crystal contacts is not always a trivial task and can lead to wrong interpretation of macromolecular structures. We devised an approach (CRK, core‐rim K_a/K_s ratio) for distinguishing biologically relevant interfaces from nonspecific ones. Given a protein–protein interface, CRK finds a set of homologs to the sequences of the proteins involved in the interface, retrieves and aligns the corresponding coding sequences, on which it carries out a residue‐by‐residue K_a/K_s ratio (ω) calculation. It divides interface residues into a “rim” and a “core” set and analyzes the selection pressure on the residues belonging to the two sets. We developed and tested CRK on different datasets and test cases, consisting of biologically relevant contacts, nonspecific ones or of both types. The method proves very effective in distinguishing the two categories of interfaces, with an overall accuracy rate of 84%. As it relies on different principles when compared with existing tools, CRK is optimally suited to be used in combination with them. In addition, CRK has potential applications in the validation of structures of oligomeric proteins and protein complexes. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Insights from the structural analysis of protein heterodimer interfaces

Protein heterodimer complexes are often involved in catalysis, regulation, assembly, immunity and inhibition. This involves the formation of stable interfaces between the interacting partners. Hence, it is of interest to describe heterodimer interfaces using known structural complexes. We use a non-redundant dataset of 192 heterodimer complex structures from the protein databank (PDB) to identify interface residues and describe their interfaces using amino-acids residue property preference. Analysis of the dataset shows that the heterodimer interfaces are often abundant in polar residues. The analysis also shows the presence of two classes of interfaces in heterodimer complexes. The first class of interfaces (class A) with more polar residues than core but less than surface is known. These interfaces are more hydrophobic than surfaces, where protein-protein binding is largely hydrophobic. The second class of interfaces (class B) with more polar residues than core and surface is shown. These interfaces are more polar than surfaces, where binding is mainly polar. Thus, these findings provide insights to the understanding of protein-protein interactions.     

X-ray snapshots of the maturation of an antibody response to a protein antigen

The process whereby the immune system generates antibodies of higher affinities during a response to antigen (affinity maturation) is a prototypical example of molecular evolution. Earlier studies have been confined to antibodies specific for small molecules (haptens) rather than for proteins. We compare the structures of four antibodies bound to the same site on hen egg white lysozyme (HEL) at different stages of affinity maturation. These X-ray snapshots reveal that binding is enhanced, not through the formation of additional hydrogen bonds or van der Waals contacts or by an increase in total buried surface, but by burial of increasing amounts of apolar surface at the expense of polar surface, accompanied by improved shape complementarity. The increase in hydrophobic interactions results from highly correlated rearrangements in antibody residues at the interface periphery, adjacent to the central energetic hot spot. This first visualization of the maturation of antibodies to protein provides insights into the evolution of high affinity in other protein-protein interfaces.