ten-a overexpression causes abnormal pattern in the Drosophila compound eye

Ten-a is one of the two Drosophila proteins that belong to the Ten M protein family. This protein is a type Ⅱ transmembrane protein and is expressed mainly in the embryonic CNS, in the larval eye imaginal disc and in the compound eye of the pupa. Here, we investigate the role of ten-α during development of the compound eye by using the Gal4/ UAS system to induce ten-α overexpression in the developing eye. We found that overexpression of ten-α can perturb eye development during all stages examined. In an early stage, overexpression of ten-α in eye primordial cells caused small and rough eyes and interfered with photoreceptor cell recruitment, resulting in some ommatidia having fewer or extra photoreceptor cells. Conversely, ten-α overexpression daring ommatidial formation caused severe eye defects due to absence of many cellular components. Interestingly, overexpression of ten-α in the late stage developing ommatidial cluster affected the number of pigment cells, caused cone cells proliferation in many ommatidia, and caused some photoreceptor cell defects. These results suggest that ten-α may be a novel gene required for normal eye morphogenesis.     

Wingless eliminates ommatidia from the edge of the developing eye through activation of apoptosis

The Drosophila compound eye is formed by selective recruitment of undifferentiated cells into clusters called ommatidia during late larval and early pupal development. Ommatidia at the edge of the eye, which often lack the full complement of photoreceptors and support cells, undergo apoptosis during mid-pupation. We have found that this cell death is triggered by the secreted glycoprotein Wingless, which activates its own expression in peripheral ommatidia via a positive feedback loop. Wingless signaling elevates the expression of the pro-apoptotic factors head involution defective, grim and reaper, which are required for ommatidial elimination. We estimate that approximately 6-8% of the total photoreceptor pool in each eye is removed by this mechanism. In addition, we show that the retinal apoptosis previously reported in apc1 mutants occurs at the same time as the peripheral ommatidial cell death and also depends on head involution defective, grim and reaper. We consider the implications of these findings for eye development and function in Drosophila and other organisms.     

Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated human chondrocytes in high-density cultures

The ommatidia in the ventral two-thirds of the compound eye of male Pieris rapae crucivora are not uniform. Each ommatidium contains nine photoreceptor cells. Four cells (R1-4) form the distal two-thirds of the rhabdom, four cells (R5-8) approximately occupy the proximal one-third of the rhabdom, and the ninth cell (R9) takes up a minor basal part of the rhabdom. The R5-8 photoreceptor cells contain clusters of reddish pigment adjacent to the rhabdom. From the position of the pigment clusters, three types of ommatidia can be identified: the trapezoidal (type I), square (type II), and rectangular type (type III). Microspectrophotometry with an epi-illumination microscope has revealed that the reflectance spectra of type I and type III ommatidia peak at 635 nm and those of type II ommatidia peak at 675 nm. The bandwith of the reflectance spectra is 40-50 nm. Type II ommatidia strongly fluoresce under ultra-violet and violet epi-illumination. The three types of ommatidia are randomly distributed. The ommatidial heterogeneity is presumably crucial for color discrimination.     

Cell clones and pattern formation: On the lineage of photoreceptor cells in the compound eye ofDrosophila

Summary The generalogical relationships of photoreceptor cells within the compound eye ofDrosophila have been studied using cell labelling, with either³H-thymidine or recessive mutations, during the third larval stage. It has been found that photoreceptor and secondary pigment cells arise from different precursor cells. Under the present experimental conditions, precursors of receptor cells give rise to about 8 elements which differentiate as R cells of two different groups. One of the cells differentiates as R7 and the remaining as any one of the R1 to R6. The last cells behave initially as equivalent, and can differentiate within the same or within different, but neighbouring, ommatidia. The class of R1 to R6 cell in which each one of these elements differentiates, seems to depend on the time of its origin. The implications of these findings for the formation of the ommatidial pattern are discussed.     

Localization of DER and the pattern of cell divisions in wild-type and Ellipse eye imaginal discs.

The compound eye of Drosophila develops from a uniform layer of epithelial cells in the eye imaginal disc. One intriguing aspect of eye development is the establishment of the correct number and spacing of the photoreceptor clusters which give rise to the mature ommatidia. Ellipse (Elp) has been implicated as playing a role in this process because the Elp dominant gain of function mutation dramatically reduces the number of photoreceptor clusters in the compound eye without affecting the morphology of individual clusters that are formed (Baker and Rubin, 1989). Since Elp represents an allele of the Drosophila EGF receptor (DER) locus, it encodes a protein which is structurally capable of mediating inductive cell-cell interactions. In an effort to better understand the role of the DER locus in ommatidial patterning, we compared the localization of DER protein in eye imaginal discs of wild-type and Elp larvae. The distribution of this receptor is consistent with the notion of its mediating interactions between cells at the initial stages of photoreceptor precluster positioning and differentiation. However, the basis of the Elp gain of function mutation is not ectopic or increased expression of the DER protein. Rather, expression of the Elp form of the EGF receptor homolog in the normal localization leads to changes in the proliferative pattern of cells dividing posterior to the morphogenetic furrow.     

The beginning of pattern formation in the Drosophila compound eye: the morphogenetic furrow and the second mitotic wave.

Events in the morphogenetic furrow set the stage for all subsequent compound eye development in Drosophila. The periodic pattern of the adult eye begins in the furrow with the spaced initiation of ommatidial rudiments, the preclusters. A wave of mitosis closely follows the furrow. A cell-by-cell analysis reveals details of these events. Early stages of ommatidial assembly can be resolved using a lead sulfide stain. Overt ommatidial organization begins in the morphogenetic furrow as cells gather into periodically spaced concentric aggregates. A stereotyped sequence of cell rearrangements converts these aggregates into preclusters. In the furrow, new rows of ommatidia are initiated at the equator and grow as new clusters are added to the peripheral ends. Mitotic labeling using BrdU feeds shows that all cells not incorporated into a precluster divide. BrdU injections show that cells divide roughly simultaneously between two adjacent rows of ommatidia.     

Preferential adhesion maintains separation of ommatidia in the Drosophila eye

In the Drosophila eye, neighboring ommatidia are separated by inter-ommatidial cells (IOCs). How this ommatidial spacing emerges during eye development is not clear. Here we demonstrate that four adhesion molecules of the Irre cell recognition module (IRM) family play a redundant role in maintaining separation of ommatidia. The four IRM proteins are divided into two groups: Kirre and Rst are expressed in IOCs, and Hbs and Sns in primary pigment cells (1°s). Kirre binds Hbs and Sns in vivo and in vitro. Reducing activity of either Rst or Kirre alone had minimal effects on ommatidial spacing, but reducing both together led to direct ommatidium:ommatidium contact. A similar phenotype was also observed when reducing both Hbs and Sns. Consistent with the role of these factors in sorting ommatidia, mis-expression of Hbs plus Sns within a single IOC led to complete separation of the cell from neighboring ommatidia. Our results indicate mutual preferential adhesion between ommatidia and IOCs mediated by four IRM proteins is both necessary and sufficient to maintain separation of ommatidia.     

Chemical modification of cell death in the Bar eye of Drosophila

Summary Cell death during the development of the mutant Bar of Drosophila melanogaster has been further investigated. The temporal and spatial distribution of degenerating cells was determined by light microscopy of serial sections of Bar eye discs. It appears that the presumptive eye cells die during the initial stage of differentiation; i.e., during their organization into groups of cells corresponding to the future ommatidia.The effects of acetamide and cytosine treatment on the development of the Bar eye disc were also examined. Both of these compounds, when fed to larvae, greatly increase facet number in the adult fly. Acetamide increases facet number by inhibiting Bar specific cell death, while cytosine delays degeneration to a later stage in development when ommatidial organization is almost complete.     

Neuronal development in the Drosophila compound eye: Photoreceptor cells R1, R6, and R7 fail to differentiate in the retina aberrant in pattern (rap) mutant

The compound eye of Drosophila is a reiterated pattern of 800 unit eyes known as ommatidia. In each ommatidium there are eight photoreceptor neurons (R1–R8) and an invariant number of accessory cells organized in a precise manner. In the developing eye, specification of cell fates is triggered by sequential inductive events mediated by cell-cell interactions. The R8 photoreceptor neuron is the first cell to differentiate and is thought to play a central role in the recruitment of the remaining photoreceptor cells. Our previous work demonstrated that mutations in the retina aberrant in pattern (rap) locus lead to abnormal pattern formation in the compound eye. Genetic mosaic experiments demonstrated that for normal retinal patterning to occur, rap gene function is required only in the photoreceptor cell R8. In this study we analyzed the R cell composition of developing as well as the adult eyes of rap mutants employing a variety of R cell specific markers. We show that in rap mutants, although some of the R8-specific markers show normal expression patterns, other aspects of the R8 cell differentiation are abnormal. In addition, the cells R1, R6, and R7 fail to differentiate properly in rap mutants. These results suggest that the rap gene encodes an R8-specific function that plays a role in the determination of the photoreceptor cells R1, R6, and R7. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Light‐induced damage to the dioptric apparatus of nephrops norvegicus (L.) and the quantitative assessment of the damage

In Nephrops norvegicus damage to the compound eye following exposure to excess light is not restricted to the photoreceptor layer, but is followed by morphological changes to the dioptric apparatus. Retinula cell damage results in the disruption of the cone cell processes leading to distal retraction of the crystalline tracts. The shape of the cones is also affected and there is a redistribution of the distal pigments. Within two months of exposure the reflective properties of subcorneal elements are changed and damage may be seen in the intact eye. A method based on external observations of the intact eye has been developed for quantitatively estimating the damage to the dioptric layer. The figures obtained were compared with estimates of retinula cell damage in the same eyes calculated using measurements from serially sectioned material. The estimation of ommatidial damage without recourse to sectioning should be of immediate practical benefit.     

UV photoreceptors in the compound eye of Daphnia magna (Crustacea,Branchiopoda). A fourth spectral class in single ommatidia

Summary The spectral sensitivities of individually stimulated ommatidia in the compound eye of Daphnia magna were measured using a fast spectral scan voltage-clamp technique with extracellular recording. Chromatic adaptation was used to reveal the contributions of individual spectral classes of photoreceptors to the ommatidial sensitivity. Ommatidia in the dorsal and ventral regions of the compound eye were tested. Four spectral classes of photoreceptors were found in each ommatidium, among them a previously undetected class with peak sensitivity in the ultraviolet. The wavelengths of peak sensitivity were at 348, 434, 525, and 608 nm for the dorsal ommatidia. The three longer wavelength classes agreed well with those found previously by intracellular recording (Schehr 1984). Only small differences in wavelength and magnitude of peak sensitivity were found between the four classes in the dorsal versus ventral ommatidia.     

Control of photoreceptor cell morphology, planar polarity and epithelial integrity during Drosophila eye development

We report that the hindsight (hnt) gene, which encodes a nuclear zinc-finger protein, regulates cell morphology, cell fate specification, planar cell polarity and epithelial integrity during Drosophila retinal development. In the third instar larval eye imaginal disc, HNT protein expression begins in the morphogenetic furrow and is refined to cells in the developing photoreceptor cell clusters just before their determination as neurons. In hnt mutant larval eye tissue, furrow markers persist abnormally posterior to the furrow, there is a delay in specification of preclusters as cells exit the furrow, there are morphological defects in the preclusters and recruitment of cells into specific R cell fates often does not occur. Additionally, genetically mosaic ommatidia with one or more hnt mutant outer photoreceptor cells, have planar polarity defects that include achirality, reversed chirality and misrotation. Mutants in the JNK pathway act as dominant suppressors of the hnt planar polarity phenotype, suggesting that HNT functions to downregulate JUN kinase (JNK) signaling during the establishment of ommatidial planar polarity. HNT expression continues in the photoreceptor cells of the pupal retina. When an ommatidium contains four or more hnt mutant photoreceptor cells, both genetically mutant and genetically wild-type photoreceptor cells fall out of the retinal epithelium, indicating a role for HNT in maintenance of epithelial integrity. In the late pupal stages, HNT regulates the morphogenesis of rhabdomeres within individual photoreceptor cells and the separation of the rhabdomeres of adjacent photoreceptor cells. Apical F-actin is depleted in hnt mutant photoreceptor cells before the observed defects in cellular morphogenesis and epithelial integrity. The analyses presented here, together with our previous studies in the embryonic amnioserosa and tracheal system, show that HNT has a general role in regulation of the F-actin-based cytoskeleton, JNK signaling, cell morphology and epithelial integrity during development.     

Modulation of Drosophila retinal epithelial integrity by the adhesion proteins capricious and tartan

Background

The development of the Drosophila eye imaginal disc requires complex epithelial rearrangements. Cells of the morphogenetic furrow are apically constricted and this leads to a physical indentation in the epithelium. Posterior to the furrow, cells start to rearrange into distinct clusters and eventually form a precisely patterned array of ommatidia. These morphogenetic processes include regulated changes of adhesion between cells.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here, we show that two transmembrane adhesion proteins, Capricious and Tartan, have dynamic and complementary expression patterns in the eye imaginal disc. We also describe novel null mutations in capricious and double null mutations in capricious and tartan. We report that they have redundant functions in regulating the architecture of the morphogenetic furrow and ommatidial spacing.

Conclusions/Significance

We conclude that Capricious and Tartan contribute to the adhesive properties of the cells in the morphogenetic furrow and that this regulated adhesion participates in the control of spacing ommatidial clusters.     

Specialized ommatidia of the polarization-sensitive dorsal rim area in the eye of monarch butterflies have non-functional reflecting tapeta

Many insects exploit sky light polarization for navigation or cruising-course control. The detection of polarized sky light is mediated by the ommatidia of a small specialized part of the compound eye: the dorsal rim area (DRA). We describe the morphology and fine structure of the DRA in monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus). The DRA consists of approximately 100 ommatidia forming a narrow ribbon along the dorsal eye margin. Each ommatidium contains two types of photoreceptor with mutually orthogonal microvilli orientations occurring in a 2:6 ratio. Within each rhabdomere, the microvilli are well aligned. Rhabdom structure and orientation remain constant at all retinal levels, but the rhabdom profiles, as seen in tangential sections through the DRA, change their orientations in a fan-like fashion from the frontal to the caudal end of the DRA. Whereas these properties (two microvillar orientations per rhabdom, microvillar alignment along rhabdomeres, ommatidial fan array) are typical for insect DRAs in general, we also report and discuss here a novel feature. The ommatidia of monarch butterflies are equipped with reflecting tapeta, which are directly connected to the proximal ends of the rhabdoms. Although tapeta are also present in the DRA, they are separated from the rhabdoms by a space of approximately 55 μm effectively inactivating them. This reduces self-screening effects, keeping polarization sensitivity of all photoreceptors of the DRA ommatidia both high and approximately equal.     

Retinal development in the lobster Homarus americanus. Comparison with compound eyes of insects and other crustaceans

Pattern formation and ommatidial differentiation were examined in the developing retina of the lobster Homarus americanus using light and electron microscopy. In the lobster the retina differentiates from the surface ectoderm that covers the optic primordia. Initially a single band of proliferation moves across this surface ectoderm. Immediately following this wave of proliferation, rows of ommatidial cell clusters appear. The earliest cell clusters are often seen adjacent to dividing cells of the proliferation band. The changing organization of the first seven rows of ommatidial clusters, visible at the surface of the retina, reveals events in early ommatidial differentiation. A rosette-like cluster of 18 cells forms the first row. Each stage following the rosette clusters occurs in a separate staggered row. Developing ommatidia have a central cluster of retinula cells, whose organization changes at each stage. Four cone cells enclose the retinula cells in each cluster and extend to the surface. In the seventh row, rhabdome formation begins and the retinula cells recede, leaving only cone cells visible at the retinal surface. This change initiates the two-tiered organization of the adult ommatidium. In 70% embryos, asymmetries in the position of the R8 axon around R7 create an equatorial line separating the dorsal and ventral halves of the retina. Possible mechanisms for the formation of these asymmetries are discussed. Postembryonic growth of the retina continues in stage VI juvenile animals along the ventral edge of the retina.     

EGF signaling and ommatidial rotation in the Drosophila eye

The ommatidia of the Drosophila eye initiate development by stepwise recruitment of photoreceptors into symmetric ommatidial clusters. As they mature, the clusters become asymmetric, adopting opposite chirality on either side of the dorsoventral midline and rotating exactly 90 degrees (Figures 1A and 1B, ). The choice of chirality is governed by higher activity of the frizzled (fz) gene in one cell of the R3/R4 photoreceptor pair and by Notch-Delta (N-Dl) signaling. The 90 degrees rotation also requires activity of planar polarity genes such as fz as well as the roulette (rlt) locus. We now show that two regulators of EGF signaling, argos and sprouty (sty), and a gain-of-function Ras85D allele, interact genetically with fz in ommatidial polarity. Furthermore, we find that argos is required for ommatidial rotation, but not chirality, and that rlt is a novel allele of argos. We present evidence that there are two pathways by which EGF signaling affects ommatidial rotation. In the first, typified by the rlt phenotype, there is partial transformation of the "mystery cells" toward a neuronal fate. Although most of these mystery cells subsequently fail to develop as neurons, their partial transformation results in inappropriate subcellular localization of the Fz receptor, a likely cue for regulating ommatidial rotation. Secondly, reducing EGF signaling can specifically affect ommatidial rotation without showing transformation of the mystery cells or defects in polarity protein localization.