Amino acid changes within antenna helix are responsible for different regulatory preferences of human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes

Human glutamate dehydrogenase (hGDH) exists in hGDH1 (housekeeping isozyme) and in hGDH2 (nerve-specific isozyme), which differ markedly in their allosteric regulation. Because they differ in only 16 of their 505 amino acids, the regulatory preferences must arise from amino acid residues that are not common between hGDH1 and hGDH2. To our knowledge none of the mutagenesis studies on the hGDH isozymes to date have identified the amino acid residues fully responsible for the different regulatory preferences between hGDH1 and hGDH2. In this study we constructed hGDH1(hGDH2(390-448))hGDH1 (amino acid segment 390-448 of hGDH1 replaced by the corresponding hGDH2 segment) and hGDH2(hGDH1(390-448))hGDH2 (amino acid segment 390-448 of hGDH2 replaced by the corresponding hGDH1 segment) by swapping the corresponding amino acid segments in hGDH1 and hGDH2. The chimeric enzymes by reciprocal swapping resulted in double mutations in amino acid sequences at 415 and 443 residues that are not common between hGDH1 and hGDH2 and are located in the C-terminal 48-residue "antenna" helix, which is thought to be part of the regulatory domain of mammalian GDHs. Functional analyses revealed that the doubly mutated chimeric enzymes almost completely acquired most of the different regulatory preferences between hGDH1 and hGDH2 for electrophoretic mobility, heat-stability, ADP activation, palmitoyl-CoA inhibition, and l-leucine activation, except for GTP inhibition. Our results indicate that substitutions of the residues in the antenna region may be important evolutionary changes that led to the adaptation of hGDH2 to the unique metabolic needs of the nerve tissue.     

Important role of Ser443 in different thermal stability of human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes

Molecular biological studies confirmed that two glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes (hGDH1 and hGDH2) of distinct genetic origin are expressed in human tissues. hGDH1 is heat-stable and expressed widely, whereas hGDH2 is heat-labile and specific for neural and testicular tissues. A selective deficiency of hGDH2 has been reported in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia. We have identified an amino acid residue involved in the different thermal stability of human GDH isozymes. At 45 degrees C (pH 7.0), heat inactivation proceeded faster for hGDH2 (half life=45 min) than for hGDH1 (half-life=310 min) in the absence of allosteric regulators. Both hGDH1 and hGDH2, however, showed much slower heat inactivation processes in the presence of 1 mM ADP or 3 mM L-Leu. Virtually most of the enzyme activity remained up to 100 min at 45 degrees C after treatment with ADP and L-Leu in combination. In contrast to ADP and L-Leu, the thermal stabilities of the hGDH isozymes were not affected by addition of substrates or coenzymes. In human GDH isozymes, the 443 site is Arg in hGDH1 and Ser in hGDH2. Replacement of Ser by Arg at the 443 site by cassette mutagenesis abolished the heat lability of hGDH2 with a similar half-life of hGDH1. The mutagenesis at several other sites (L415M, A456G, and H470R) having differences in amino acid sequence between the two GDH isozymes did not show any change in the thermal stability. These results suggest that the Ser443 residue plays an important role in the different thermal stability of human GDH isozymes.     

The Odyssey of a Young Gene: Structure–Function Studies in Human Glutamate Dehydrogenases Reveal Evolutionary-Acquired Complex Allosteric Regulation Mechanisms

Mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) catalyzes the reversible inter-conversion of glutamate to α-ketoglutarate and ammonia, interconnecting carbon skeleton and nitrogen metabolism. In addition, it functions as an energy switch by its ability to fuel the Krebs cycle depending on the energy status of the cell. As GDH lies at the intersection of several metabolic pathways, its activity is tightly regulated by several allosteric compounds that are metabolic intermediates. In contrast to other mammals that have a single GDH-encoding gene, humans and great apes possess two isoforms of GDH (hGDH1 and hGDH2, encoded by the GLUD1 and GLUD2 genes, respectively) with distinct regulation pattern, but remarkable sequence similarity (they differ, in their mature form, in only 15 of their 505 amino-acids). The GLUD2 gene is considered a very young gene, emerging from the GLUD1 gene through retro-position only recently (<23 million years ago). The new hGDH2 iso-enzyme, through random mutations and natural selection, is thought to have conferred an evolutionary advantage that helped its persistence through primate evolution. The properties of the two highly homologous human GDHs have been studied using purified recombinant hGDH1 and hGDH2 proteins obtained by expression of the corresponding cDNAs in Sf21 cells. According to these studies, in contrast to hGDH1 that maintains basal activity at 35–40 % of its maximal, hGDH2 displays low basal activity that is highly responsive to activation by rising levels of ADP and/or l-leucine which can also act synergistically. While hGDH1 is inhibited potently by GTP, hGDH2 shows remarkable GTP resistance. Furthermore, the two iso-enzymes are differentially inhibited by estrogens, polyamines and neuroleptics, and also differ in heat-lability. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms that underlie these different regulation patterns of the two iso-enzymes (and consequently the evolutionary adaptation of hGDH2 to a new functional role), we have performed mutagenesis at sites of difference in their amino acid sequence. Results showed that the low basal activity, heat-lability and estrogen sensitivity of hGDH2 could be, at least partially, ascribed to the Arg443Ser evolutionary change, whereas resistance to GTP inhibition has been attributed to the Gly456Ala change. Other amino acid substitutions studied thus far cannot explain all the remaining functional differences between the two iso-enzymes. Also, the Arg443Ser/Gly456Ala double mutation in hGDH1 approached the properties of wild-type hGDH2, without being identical to it. The insights into the structural mechanism of enzymatic regulation and the implications in cell biology provided by these findings are discussed.     

The human GLUD2 glutamate dehydrogenase and its regulation in health and disease

Whereas glutamate dehydrogenase in most mammals (hGDH1 in the human) is encoded by a single functional GLUD1 gene expressed widely, humans and other primates have acquired through retroposition an X-linked GLUD2 gene that encodes a highly homologous isoenzyme (hGDH2) expressed in testis and brain. Using an antibody specific for hGDH2, we showed that hGDH2 is expressed in testicular Sertoli cells and in cerebral cortical astrocytes. Although hGDH1 and hGDH2 have similar catalytic properties, they differ markedly in their regulatory profile. While hGDH1 is potently inhibited by GTP and may be controlled by the need of the cell for ATP, hGDH2 has dissociated its function from GTP and may metabolize glutamate even when the Krebs cycle generates GTP amounts sufficient to inactivate hGDH1. As astrocytes are known to provide neurons with lactate that largely derives from the Krebs cycle via conversion of glutamate to α-ketoglutarate, the selective expression of hGDH2 may facilitate metabolic recycling processes essential for glutamatergic transmission. As there is evidence for deregulation of glutamate metabolism in degenerative neurologic disorders, we sequenced GLUD1 and GLUD2 genes in neurologic patients and found that a rare T1492G variation in GLUD2 that results in substitution of Ala for Ser445 in the regulatory domain of hGDH2 interacted significantly with Parkinson's disease (PD) onset. Thus, in two independent Greek and one North American PD cohorts, Ser445Ala hemizygous males, but not heterozygous females, developed PD 6-13 years earlier than subjects with other genotypes. The Ala445-hGDH2 variant shows enhanced catalytic activity that is resistant to modulation by GTP, but sensitive to inhibition by estrogens. These observations are thought to suggest that enhanced glutamate oxidation by the Ala445-hGDH2 variant accelerates nigral cell degeneration in hemizygous males and that inhibition of the overactive enzyme by estrogens protects heterozygous females. We then evaluated the interaction of estrogens and neuroleptic agents (haloperidol and perphenazine) with the wild-type hGDH1 and hGDH2 and found that both inhibited hGDH2 more potently than hGDH1 and that the evolutionary Arg443Ser substitution was largely responsible for this sensitivity. Hence, the properties acquired by hGDH2 during its evolution have made the enzyme a selective target for neuroactive steroids and drugs, providing new means for therapeutic interventions in disorders linked to deregulation of this enzyme.     

Roles of cysteine residues in the inhibition of human glutamate dehydrogenase by palmitoyl-CoA

Human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes (hGDH1 and hGDH2) have been known to be inhibited by palmitoyl-CoA with a high affinity. In this study, we have performed the cassette mutagenesis at six different Cys residues (Cys59, Cys93, Cys119, Cys201, Cys274, and Cys323) to identify palmitoyl-CoA binding sites within hGDH2. Four cysteine residues at positions of C59, C93, C201, or C274 may be involved, at least in part, in the inhibition of hGDH2 by palmitoyl-CoA. There was a biphasic relationship, depending on the levels of palmitoyl-CoA, between the binding of palmitoyl-CoA and the loss of enzyme activity during the inactivation process. The inhibition of hGDH2 by palmitoyl-CoA was not affected by the allosteric inhibitor GTP. Multiple mutagenesis studies on the hGDH2 are in progress to identify the amino acid residues fully responsible for the inhibition by palmitoyl-CoA. [BMB Reports 2012; 45(12): 707-712]     

Estrogen Modification of Human Glutamate Dehydrogenases Is Linked to Enzyme Activation State

Mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is a housekeeping enzyme central to the metabolism of glutamate. Its activity is potently inhibited by GTP (IC₅₀ = 0.1–0.3 μm) and thought to be controlled by the need of the cell in ATP. Estrogens are also known to inhibit mammalian GDH, but at relatively high concentrations. Because, in addition to this housekeeping human (h) GDH1, humans have acquired via a duplication event an hGDH2 isoform expressed in human cortical astrocytes, we tested here the interaction of estrogens with the two human isoenzymes. The results showed that, under base-line conditions, diethylstilbestrol potently inhibited hGDH2 (IC₅₀ = 0.08 ± 0.01 μm) and with ∼18-fold lower affinity hGDH1 (IC₅₀ = 1.67 ± 0.06 μm; p < 0.001). Similarly, 17β-estradiol showed a ∼18-fold higher affinity for hGDH2 (IC₅₀ = 1.53 ± 0.24 μm) than for hGDH1 (IC₅₀ = 26.94 ± 1.07 μm; p < 0.001). Also, estriol and progesterone were more potent inhibitors of hGDH2 than hGDH1. Structure/function analyses revealed that the evolutionary R443S substitution, which confers low basal activity, was largely responsible for sensitivity of hGDH2 to estrogens. Inhibition of both human GDHs by estrogens was inversely related to their state of activation induced by ADP, with the slope of this correlation being steeper for hGDH2 than for hGDH1. Also, the study of hGDH1 and hGDH2 mutants displaying different states of activation revealed that the affinity of estrogen for these enzymes correlated inversely (R = 0.99; p = 0.0001) with basal catalytic activity. Because astrocytes are known to synthesize estrogens, these hormones, by interacting potently with hGDH2 in its closed state, may contribute to regulation of glutamate metabolism in brain.     

Side‐chain interactions in the regulatory domain of human glutamate dehydrogenase determine basal activity and regulation

Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH) is central to the metabolism of glutamate, a major excitatory transmitter in mammalian central nervous system (CNS). hGDH1 is activated by ADP and L‐leucine and powerfully inhibited by GTP. Besides this housekeeping hGDH1, duplication led to an hGDH2 isoform that is expressed in the human brain dissociating its function from GTP control. The novel enzyme has reduced basal activity (4–6% of capacity) while remaining remarkably responsive to ADP/L‐leucine activation. While the molecular basis of this evolutionary adaptation remains unclear, substitution of Ser for Arg443 in hGDH1 is shown to diminish basal activity (< 2% of capacity) and abrogate L‐leucine activation. To explore whether the Arg443Ser mutation disrupts hydrogen bonding between Arg443 and Ser409 of adjacent monomers in the regulatory domain (‘antenna’), we replaced Ser409 by Arg or Asp in hGDH1. The Ser409Arg‐1 change essentially replicated the Arg443Ser‐1 mutation effects. Molecular dynamics simulation predicted that Ser409 and Arg443 of neighboring monomers come in close proximity in the open conformation and that introduction of Ser443‐1 or Arg409‐1 causes them to separate with the swap mutation (Arg409/Ser443) reinstating their proximity. A swapped Ser409Arg/Arg443Ser‐1 mutant protein, obtained in recombinant form, regained most of the wild‐type hGDH1 properties. Also, when Ser443 was replaced by Arg443 in hGDH2 (as occurs in hGDH1), the Ser443Arg‐2 mutant acquired most of the hGDH1 properties. Hence, side‐chain interactions between 409 and 443 positions in the ‘antenna’ region of hGDHs are crucial for basal catalytic activity, allosteric regulation, and relative resistance to thermal inactivation.

     

The complex regulation of human glud1 and glud2 glutamate dehydrogenases and its implications in nerve tissue biology

Mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is a housekeeping mitochondrial enzyme (hGDH1 in the human) that catalyses the reversible inter-conversion of glutamate to α-ketoglutarate and ammonia, thus interconnecting amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism. It displays an energy sensing mechanism, which permits enzyme activation under low cellular energy states. As GDH is at the crossroads of important metabolic pathways, a tight control of its activity is essential. Indeed, to fulfill its role in metabolism and cellular energetics, mammalian GDH has evolved into a highly regulated enzyme subject to allosteric modulation by diverse compounds. The recent emergence (<23million years ago) in apes and humans of a hGDH2 isoenzyme with distinct regulatory properties, as well as, the detection of gain-of-function variants in hGDH1 and hGDH2 that affect the nervous system, have introduced additional complexities. The properties of the two highly homologous human GDHs were studied using purified recombinant hGDH1 and hGDH2 obtained by expression of the corresponding cDNAs in Sf21 cells. Results showed that, in contrast to hGDH1 that maintains substantial basal activity (35-40% of its maximal capacity), hGDH2 displays low basal activity (3-8% of maximal) that is remarkably responsive to activation by rising levels of ADP and/or l-leucine. This is primarily due to the Arg443Ser evolutionary change, which also made hGDH2 markedly sensitive to estrogens and neuroleptic drugs. In contrast to hGDH1, which is subject to potent GTP inhibition, hGDH2 has dissociated its function from this energy switch, being able to metabolize glutamate even when the Krebs cycle generates GTP levels sufficient to inactivate the housekeeping hGDH1. Our data also show that spermidine, a polyamine thought to reduce oxidative stress and to prolong survival, and EGCG, a green tea polyphenol, inhibit hGDH2 at lower concentrations than hGDH1. The implications of these findings in nerve tissue biology are discussed.     

Identification of ADP-ribosylation site in human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes

When the influence of ADP-ribosylation on the activities of the purified human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes (hGDH1 and hGDH2) was measured in the presence of 100 microM NAD+ for 60 min, hGDH isozymes were inhibited by up to 75%. If incubations were performed for longer time periods up to 3 h, the inhibition of hGDH isozymes did not increased further. This phenomenon may be related to the reversibility of ADP-ribosylation in mitochondria. ADP-ribosylated hDGH isozymes were reactivated by Mg2+-dependent mitochondrial ADP-ribosylcysteine hydrolase. The stoichiometry between incorporated ADP-ribose and GDH subunits shows a modification of one subunit per catalytically active homohexamer. Since ADP and GTP had no effects on the extent of modification, it would appear that the ADP-ribosylation is unlikely to occur in allosteric sites. It has been proposed that Cys residue may be involved in the ADP-ribosylation of GDH, although identification of the reactive Cys residue has not been reported. To identify the reactive Cys residue involved in the ADP-ribosylation, we performed cassette mutagenesis at three different positions (Cys59, Cys119, and Cys274) using synthetic genes of hGDH isozymes. Among the Cys residues tested, only Cys119 mutants showed a significant reduction in the ADP-ribosylation. These results suggest a possibility that the Cys119 residue has an important role in the regulation of hGDH isozymes by ADP-ribosylation.     

Critical role of the cysteine 323 residue in the catalytic activity of human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes

The role of residue C323 in catalysis by human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes (hGDH1 and hGDH2) was examined by substituting Arg, Gly, Leu, Met, or Tyr at C323 by cassette mutagenesis using synthetic human GDH isozyme genes. As a result, the Km of the enzyme for NADH and alpha-ketoglutarate increased up to 1.6-fold and 1.1-fold, respectively. It seems likely that C323 is not responsible for substrate-binding or coenzyme-binding. The efficiency (kcat/Km) of the mutant enzymes was only 11-14% of that of the wild-type isozymes, mainly due to a decrease in kcat values. There was a linear relationship between incorporation of [14C]p-chloromercuribenzoic acid and loss of enzyme activity that extrapolated to a stoichiometry of one mol of [14C] incorporated per mol of monomer for wild type hGDHs. No incorporation of [14C]p-chloromer-curibenzoic acid was observed with the C323 mutants. ADP and GTP had no effect on the binding of p-chloromercuribenzoic acid, suggesting that C323 is not directly involved in allosteric regulation. There were no differences between the two hGDH isozymes in sensitivities to mutagenesis at C323. Our results suggest that C323 plays an important role in catalysis by human GDH isozymes.     

Glutamate Dehydrogenase Isoforms with N-Terminal (His)6- or FLAG-Tag Retain Their Kinetic Properties and Cellular Localization

Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is a crucial enzyme on the crossroads of amino acid and energy metabolism and it is operating in all domains of life. According to current knowledge GDH is present only in one functional isoform in most animals, including mice. In addition to this housekeeping enzyme (hGDH1 in humans), humans and apes have acquired a second isoform (hGDH2) with a distinct tissue expression profile. In the current study we have cloned both mouse and human GDH constructs containing FLAG and (His)₆ small genetically-encoded tags, respectively. The hGDH1 and hGDH2 constructs containing N-terminal (His)₆ tags were successfully expressed in Sf9 cells and the recombinant proteins were isolated to ≥95 % purity in a two-step procedure involving ammonium sulfate precipitation and Ni²⁺-based immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography. To explore whether the presence of the FLAG and (His)₆ tags affects the cellular localization and functionality of the GDH isoforms, we studied the subcellular distribution of the expressed enzymes as well as their regulation by adenosine diphosphate monopotassium salt (ADP) and guanosine-5′-triphosphate sodium salt (GTP). Through immunoblot analysis of the mitochondrial and cytosolic fraction of the HEK cells expressing the recombinant proteins we found that neither FLAG nor (His)₆ tag disturbs the mitochondrial localization of GDH. The addition of the small tags to the N-terminus of the mature mitochondrial mouse GDH1 or human hGDH1 and hGDH2 did not change the ADP activation or GTP inhibition pattern of the proteins as compared to their untagged counterparts. However, the addition of FLAG tag to the C-terminus of the mouse GDH left the recombinant protein fivefold less sensitive to ADP activation. This finding highlights the necessity of the functional characterization of recombinant proteins containing even the smallest available tags.     

Mutations in human GLUD2 glutamate dehydrogenase affecting basal activity and regulation

Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) in human exists in GLUD1 and GLUD2 gene-encoded isoforms (hGDH1 and hGDH2, respectively), differing in their regulation and tissue expression pattern. Whereas hGDH1 is subject to GTP control, hGDH2 uses for its regulation, a novel molecular mechanism not requiring GTP. This is based on the ability of hGDH2 to maintain a baseline activity of <10% of its capacity subject to full activation by rising ADP/ l -leucine levels. Here we studied further the molecular mechanisms regulating hGDH2 function by creating and analyzing hGDH2 mutants harboring single amino acid substitutions in the regulatory domain (antenna, pivot helix) of the protein. Five hGDH2 mutants were obtained: two with an amino acid change (Gln441Arg, Ser445Leu) in the antenna, two (Lys450Glu, His454Tyr) in the pivot helix, and one (Ser448Pro) in the junction between the two structures. Functional analyses revealed that, while the antenna mutations increased basal enzyme activity without affecting its allosteric properties, the pivot helix mutations drastically reduced basal activity and impaired enzyme regulation. On the other hand, the Ser448Pro mutation reduced basal activity but did not alter allosteric regulation. Also, compared with wild-type hGDH2, the antenna mutants were relatively thermostable, whereas the pivot helix mutants were extremely heat labile. Hence, the present data further our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the function and stability of hGDH2, an enzyme thought to be of importance for nerve tissue biology.     

Reactive amino acid residues involved in glutamate-binding of human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes

In the present study, the cassette mutagenesis at several putative positions (K94, G96, K118, K130, or D172) was performed to examine the residues involved in the glutamate-binding of the human glutamate dehydrogenase isozymes (hGDH1 and hGDH2). None of the mutations tested affected the expression or stability of the proteins. There was dramatic reduction in the catalytic efficiency in mutant proteins at K94, G96, K118, or K130 site, but not at D172 site. The K(M) values for glutamate were 4-10-fold greater for the mutants at K94, G96, or K118 site than for the wild-type hGDH1 and hGDH2, whereas no differences in the K(M) values for NAD(+) were detected between the mutant and wild-type enzymes. For K130Y mutant, the K(M) value for glutamate increased 1.6-fold, whereas the catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K(M)) showed only 2-3% of the wild-type. Therefore, the decreased catalytic efficiency of the K130 mutant mainly results from the reduced k(cat) value, suggesting a possibility that the K130Y residue may be involved in the catalysis rather than in the glutamate-binding. The D172Y mutant did not show any changes in k(cat) value and K(M) values for glutamate and NAD(+), indicating that D172Y is not directly involved in catalysis and substrates binding of the hGDH isozymes. For sensitivity to ADP activation, only the D172Y mutant showed a reduced sensitivity to ADP activation. The reduction of ADP activation in D172Y mutant was more profoundly observed in hGDH2 than in hGDH1. There were no differences in their sensitivities to GTP inhibition between the wild-type and mutant GDHs at all positions tested. Our results suggest that K94, G96, and K118 residues play an important role, although at different degrees, in the binding of glutamate to hGDH isozymes.     

Two Distinct Pancreatic Amylase Genes Are Active in Ybr Mice

The genetic determinants of pancreatic amylase expression in YBR mice differ in two respects from those of other inbred strains. First, there are two nonallelic amylase isozymes present in YBR pancreas, while most mouse strains express a single pancreatic amylase protein. In addition, the in vivo rate of total pancreatic amylase synthesis is 50% of that in other strains. Both these traits are determined by genetic sites in the region of the Amy-2 locus on mouse chromosome 3. To determine the molecular basis for the presence of two isozymes in this strain, we have compared portions of their amino acid sequences. Two differences between isozymes A₁ and B₁ were identified among the 77 residues compared. This result demonstrates that two distinct amylase genes are expressed in YBR pancreas.     

The difference in the carboxy-terminal sequence is responsible for the difference in the activity of chicken and rat liver fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase

The fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase domain of the bifunctional chicken liver enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase shares approximately 95% amino acid sequence homology with that of the rat enzyme. However, these two enzymes are significantly different in their phosphatase activities. In this report, we show that the COOH-terminal 25 amino acids of the two enzymes are responsible for the different enzymatic activities. Although these 25 amino acids are not required for the phosphatase activity, their removal diminishes the differences in the activities between the two enzymes. In addition, two chimeric molecules (one consisting of the catalytic core of the chicken bisphosphatase domain and the rat COOH-terminal 25 amino acids, and the other consisting of most of the intact chicken enzyme and the rat COOH-terminal 25 amino acids) showed the same kinetic properties as the rat enzyme. Furthermore, substitution of the residues Pro456Pro457Ala458 of the chicken enzyme with GluAlaGlu, the corresponding sequence in the rat liver enzyme, yields a chicken enzyme that behaves like the rat enzyme. These results demonstrate that the different bisphosphatase activities of the chicken and rat liver bifunctional enzymes can be attributed to the differences in their COOH-terminal amino acid sequences, particularly the three residues.     

Heterogeneous Cellular Distribution of Glutamate Dehydrogenase in Brain and in Non-neural Tissues

Mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is an evolutionarily conserved enzyme central to the metabolism of glutamate, the main excitatory transmitter in mammalian CNS. Its activity is allosterically regulated and thought to be controlled by the need of the cell for ATP. While in most mammals, GDH is encoded by a single GLUD1 gene that is widely expressed (housekeeping; hGDH1 in the human), humans and other primates have acquired via retroposition a GLUD2 gene encoding an hGDH2 isoenzyme with distinct functional properties and tissue expression profile. Whereas hGDH1 shows high levels of expression in the liver, hGDH2 is expressed in human testis, brain and kidney. Recent studies have provided significant insight into the functional adaptation of hGDH2. This includes resistance to GTP control, enhanced sensitivity to inhibition by estrogens and other endogenous allosteric effectors, and ability to function in a relatively acidic environment. While inhibition of hGDH1 by GTP, derived from Krebs cycle, represents the main mechanism by which the flux of glutamate through this pathway is regulated, dissociation of hGDH2 from GTP control may provide a biological advantage by permitting enzyme function independently of this energy switch. Also, the relatively low optimal pH for hGDH2 is suited for transmitter glutamate metabolism, as glutamate uptake by astrocytes leads to significant mitochondrial acidification. Although mammalian GDH is a housekeeping enzyme, its levels of expression vary markedly among the various tissues and among the different types of cells that constitute the same organ. In this paper, we will review existing evidence on the cellular and subcellular distribution of GDH in neural and non-neural tissues of experimental animals and humans, and consider the implications of these findings in biology of these tissues. Special attention is given to accumulating evidence that glutamate flux through the GDH pathway is linked to cell signaling mechanisms that may be tissue-specific.     

Contribution of the Distal Pocket Residue to the Acyl-Chain-Length Specificity of (R)-Specific Enoyl-Coenzyme A Hydratases from Pseudomonas spp.

(R)-Specific enoyl-coenzyme A (enoyl-CoA) hydratases (PhaJs) are capable of supplying monomers from fatty acid β-oxidation to polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) biosynthesis. PhaJ1_Pp from Pseudomonas putida showed broader substrate specificity than did PhaJ1_Pa from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, despite sharing 67% amino acid sequence identity. In this study, the substrate specificity characteristics of two Pseudomonas PhaJ1 enzymes were investigated by site-directed mutagenesis, chimeragenesis, X-ray crystallographic analysis, and homology modeling. In PhaJ1_Pp, the replacement of valine with isoleucine at position 72 resulted in an increased preference for enoyl-coenzyme A (CoA) elements with shorter chain lengths. Conversely, at the same position in PhaJ1_Pa, the replacement of isoleucine with valine resulted in an increased preference for enoyl-CoAs with longer chain lengths. These changes suggest a narrowing and broadening in the substrate specificity range of the PhaJ1_Pp and PhaJ1_Pa mutants, respectively. However, the substrate specificity remains broader in PhaJ1_Pp than in PhaJ1_Pa. Additionally, three chimeric PhaJ1 enzymes, composed from PhaJ1_Pp and PhaJ1_Pa, all showed significant hydratase activity, and their substrate preferences were within the range exhibited by the parental PhaJ1 enzymes. The crystal structure of PhaJ1_Pa was determined at a resolution of 1.7 Å, and subsequent homology modeling of PhaJ1_Pp revealed that in the acyl-chain binding pocket, the amino acid at position 72 was the only difference between the two structures. These results indicate that the chain-length specificity of PhaJ1 is determined mainly by the bulkiness of the amino acid residue at position 72, but that other factors, such as structural fluctuations, also affect specificity.     

Effect of secondary interaction on the enzymatic activity of trypsin-like enzymes from Streptomyces

The effect of secondary interaction with substrate on the enzymatic activity of trypsin-like enzymes from Streptomyces was studied using Z-Lys-(Ala)_m, Z-(Ala)_nLys-OMe, Z-Lys-X-Ala and Z-X-Lys-OMe (m = 1–4; n = 0–2; X = various amino acid residues) as substrates and a comparison was made with bovine trypsin. These peptides are susceptible to cleavage at the peptide or ester bonds containing the carbonyl group of l-lysine, which enabled determination of the effect of chain-length on either side of the sensitive l-lysine residue in the first two types of peptide, and the effect of side-chains of the amino acid residues immediately neighboring on either side of the sensitive l-lysine residue in the latter two types of peptide. The results indicate that the enzymatic activity of the trypsin-like enzymes are little affected by secondary interaction, similarly as seen with bovine trypsin.