A multi-approach analysis highlights the relevance of RPA-1 as a telomere end-binding protein (TEBP) in Leishmania amazonensis

BackgroundTelomeres are chromosome end structures important in the maintenance of genome homeostasis. They are replenished by the action of telomerase and associated proteins, such as the OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding)-fold containing telomere-end binding proteins (TEBP) which plays an essential role in telomere maintenance and protection. The nature of TEBPs is well known in higher and some primitive eukaryotes, but it remains undetermined in trypanosomatids. Previous in silico searches have shown that there are no homologs of the classical TEPBs in trypanosomatids, including Leishmania sp. However, Replication Protein A subunit 1 (RPA-1), an OB-fold containing DNA-binding protein, was found co-localized with trypanosomatids telomeres and showed a high preference for the telomeric G-rich strand.Methods and resultsWe predicted the absence of structural homologs of OB-fold containing TEBPs in the Leishmania sp. genome using structural comparisons. We demonstrated by molecular docking that the ssDNA binding mode of LaRPA-1 shares features with the higher eukaryotes POT1 and RPA-1 crystal structures ssDNA binding mode. Using fluorescence spectroscopy, protein-DNA interaction assays, and FRET, we respectively show that LaRPA-1 shares some telomeric functions with the classical TEBPs since it can bind at least one telomeric repeat, protect the telomeric G-rich DNA from 3′-5′ Exonuclease I digestion, and unfold telomeric G-quadruplex.ConclusionsOur results suggest that RPA-1 emerges as a TEBP in trypanosomatids, and in this context, we present two possible evolutionary landscapes of trypanosomatids RPA-1 that could reflect upon the evolution of OB-fold containing TEBPs from all eukaryotes.     

Chromatin regulation and non-coding RNAs at mammalian telomeres

In eukaryotes, terminal chromosome repeats are bound by a specialized nucleoprotein complex that controls telomere length and protects chromosome ends from DNA repair and degradation. In mammals the “shelterin” complex mediates these central functions at telomeres. In the recent years it has become evident that also the heterochromatic structure of mammalian telomeres is implicated in telomere length regulation. Impaired telomeric chromatin compaction results in a loss of telomere length control. Progressive telomere shortening affects chromatin compaction at telomeric and subtelomeric repeats and activates alternative telomere maintenance mechanisms. Dynamics of chromatin structure of telomeres during early mammalian development and nuclear reprogramming further indicates a central role of telomeric heterochromatin in organismal development. In addition, the recent discovery that telomeres are transcribed, giving rise to UUAGGG-repeat containing TelRNAs/TERRA, opens a new level of chromatin regulation at telomeres. Understanding the links between the epigenetic status of telomeres, TERRA/TelRNA and telomere homeostasis will open new avenues for our understanding of organismal development, cancer and ageing.     

Composition of plant telomeres

Telomeres are essential elements of eukaryotic chromosomes that differentiate native chromosome ends from deleterious DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). This is achieved by assembling chromosome termini in elaborate high-order nucleoprotein structures that in most organisms encompass telomeric DNA, specific telomere-associated proteins as well as general chromatin and DNA repair factors. Although the individual components of telomeric chromatin are evolutionary highly conserved, cross species comparisons have revealed a remarkable flexibility in their utilization at telomeres. This review outlines the strategies used for chromosome end protection and maintenance in mammals, yeast and flies and discusses current progress in deciphering telomere structure in plants.     

Structure of telomeric chromatin in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

The telomeric nucleoprotein complex protects linear chromosome ends from degradation. In contrast to most eukaryotes in which telomerase is responsible for telomere elongation by adding short DNA repeats synthesized using an RNA template, the telomere elongation in Drosophila involves transposition of specialized telomeric retroelements onto chromosome ends. Proteins that bind telomeric and subtelomeric sequences form specific telomeric chromatin, and its components are highly conserved among organisms employing different mechanisms of telomere elongation. This review is focused on the analysis of components of the Drosophila telomeric complex and its comparison with telomeric proteins in telomerase-encoded organisms. Structural and functional analysis of Drosophila telomeres suggests that there are three distinct chromatin regions: protective structure at the very end of chromosome (cap), subtelomeric region which is characterized by condensed chromatin structure, and the terminal retrotransposon array whose expression is under the control of an RNAi (RNA interference)-based mechanism. The link between RNAi and telomeric chromatin formation in germinal tissues is discussed.     

Topoisomerase IIIalpha is required for normal proliferation and telomere stability in alternative lengthening of telomeres

Topoisomerase (Topo) IIIalpha associates with BLM helicase, which is proposed to be important in the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway that allows telomere recombination in the absence of telomerase. Here, we show that human Topo IIIalpha colocalizes with telomeric proteins at ALT-associated promyelocytic bodies from ALT cells. In these cells, Topo IIIalpha immunoprecipitated with telomere binding protein (TRF) 2 and BLM and was shown to be associated with telomeric DNA by chromatin immunoprecipitation, suggesting that these proteins form a complex at telomere sequences. Topo IIIalpha depletion by small interfering RNA reduced ALT cell survival, but did not affect telomerase-positive cell lines. Moreover, repression of Topo IIIalpha expression in ALT cells reduced the levels of TRF2 and BLM proteins, provoked a strong increase in the formation of anaphase bridges, induced the degradation of the G-overhang signal, and resulted in the appearance of DNA damage at telomeres. In contrast, telomere maintenance and TRF2 levels were unaffected in telomerase-positive cells. We conclude that Topo IIIalpha is an important telomere-associated factor, essential for telomere maintenance and chromosome stability in ALT cells, and speculate on its potential mechanistic function.     

Telomere biology of trypanosomatids: more questions than answers

Trypanosomatids are severe pathogens in developing countries, where they affect both humans and domestic animals. Factors intrinsic to the host, the toxicity or subcurative effects of the available antiparasite medication and the low perspective of potential vaccines favor research on novel candidates for drug target. Telomeres are essential for the survival of most eukaryotes. In trypanosomatids, events such as antigenic variation and/or gene conversion and duplication occur at telomeric positions, possibly facilitating genome rearrangement. Understanding the role that telomere maintenance might play in the cell life span of trypanosomatids has important implications for therapeutics of parasitic diseases.     

The telomeric 5′ end nucleotide is regulated in the budding yeast Naumovozyma castellii

The junction between the double-stranded and single-stranded telomeric DNA (ds–ss junction) is fundamental in the maintenance of the telomeric chromatin, as it directs the assembly of the telomere binding proteins. In budding yeast, multiple Rap1 proteins bind the telomeric dsDNA, while ssDNA repeats are bound by the Cdc13 protein. Here, we aimed to determine, for the first time, the telomeric 5′ end nucleotide in a budding yeast. To this end, we developed a permutation-specific PCR-based method directed towards the regular 8-mer telomeric repeats in Naumovozyma castellii. We find that, in logarithmically growing cells, the 320 ± 30 bp long telomeres mainly terminate in either of two specific 5′ end permutations of the repeat, both corresponding to a terminal adenine nucleotide. Strikingly, two permutations are completely absent at the 5′ end, indicating that not all ds‐ss junction structures would allow the establishment of the protective telomere chromatin cap structure. Using in vitro DNA end protection assays, we determined that binding of Rap1 and Cdc13 around the most abundant ds–ss junction ensures the protection of both 5′ ends and 3′ overhangs from exonucleolytic degradation. Our results provide mechanistic insights into telomere protection, and reveal that Rap1 and Cdc13 have complementary roles.     

Telomeric DNA ends are essential for the localization of Ku at telomeres in fission yeast

The Ku70-Ku80 heterodimer is a conserved protein complex essential for the non-homologous end-joining pathway. Ku proteins are also involved in telomere maintenance, although their precise roles remain to be elucidated. In fission yeast, pku70(+), the gene encoding the Ku70 homologue, has been reported. Here we report the identification and characterization of pku80(+), the gene encoding Ku80. Both pku70(+) and pku80(+) are essential for efficient non-homologous end-joining. We also found that the pku70 and pku80 mutants are sensitive to methyl methanesulfonate and hydroxyurea, suggesting their roles in the S phase. The pku80 mutant shows telomere shortening and tandem amplification of a subtelomeric sequence but no defects in the telomere position effect, as was previously reported for the pku70 mutant. By using the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we demonstrated that Pku70 and Pku80 physically interact with telomeric repeats and subtelomeric sequences. Interestingly, this telomere association of Pku proteins is independent of Taz1, a telomeric DNA-binding protein. We also showed that the Pku proteins do not associate with ectopically integrated telomeric repeats in the internal region of circular chromosomes. These results indicate that the physical end of DNA is necessary for the localization of Pku80 at telomeres.     

The U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein component Imp4p is a telomeric DNA-binding protein

Imp4p is a component of U3 snoRNP (small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein) involved in the maturation of 18S rRNA. We have shown that Imp4p interacts with Cdc13p, a single-stranded telomere-binding protein involved in telomere maintenance. To understand the role of Imp4p in telomeres, we purified recombinant Imp4p protein and tested its binding activity towards telomeric DNA using electrophoretic mobility-shift assays. Our results showed that Imp4p bound specifically to single-stranded telomeric DNA in vitro. The interaction of Imp4p to telomeres in vivo was also demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. Significantly, the binding of Imp4p to telomeres was not limited to yeast proteins, since the hImp4 (human Imp4) also bound to vertebrate single-stranded telomeric DNA. Thus we conclude that Imp4p is a novel telomeric DNA-binding protein that, in addition to its role in rRNA processing, might participate in telomere function.     

The role of DNA damage response proteins at telomeres--an "integrative" model

Telomeres are specialized structures at chromosome ends which play the key role in chromosomal end protection. There is increasing evidence that many DNA damage response proteins are involved in telomere maintenance. For example, cells defective in DNA double strand break repair proteins including Ku, DNA-PKcs, RAD51D and the MRN (MRE11/RAD51/NBS1) complex show loss of telomere capping function. Similarly, mouse and human cells defective in ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) have defective telomeres. A total of 14 mammalian DNA damage response proteins have, so far, been implicated in telomere maintenance. Recent studies indicate that three more proteins, namely BRCA1, hRad9 and PARP1 are involved in telomere maintenance. The involvement of a wide range of DNA damage response proteins at telomeres raises an important question: do telomere maintenance mechanisms constitute an integral part of DNA damage response machinery? A model termed the "integrative" model is proposed here to argue in favour of telomere maintenance being an integral part of DNA damage response. The "integrative" model is supported by the observation that a telomeric protein, TRF2, is not confined to its local telomeric environment but it migrates to the sites of DNA breakage following exposure of cells to ionizing radiation. Furthermore, even if telomeres are maintained in a non-canonical way, as in the case of Drosophila, DNA damage response proteins are still involved in telomere maintenance suggesting integration of telomere maintenance mechanisms into the DNA damage response network.     

Molecular dynamics of de novo telomere heterochromatin formation in budding yeast

In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae,heterochromatin structure is found at three chromosome regions,which are homothallic mating-type loci,rDNA regions and telomeres.To address how telomere heterochromatin is assembled under physiological conditions,we employed a de novo telomere addition system,and analyzed the dynamic chromatin changes of the TRP1 reporter gene during telomere elongation.We found that integrating a 255-bp,but not an 81-bp telomeric sequence near the TRP1 promoter could trigger Sir2 recruitment,active chromatin mark(s)' removal,chromatin compaction and TRP1 gene silencing,indicating that the length of the telomeric sequence inserted in the internal region of a chromosome is critical for determining the chromatin state at the proximal region.Interestingly,Rif1 but not Rif2 or yKu is indispensable for the formation of intra-chromosomal silent chromatin initiated by telomeric sequence.When an internal short telomeric sequence(e.g.,81 bp) gets exposed to become a de novo telomere,the herterochromatin features,such as Sir recruitment,active chromatin mark(s)' removal and chromatin compaction,are detected within a few hours before the de novo telomere reaches a stable length.Our results recapitulate the molecular dynamics and reveal a coherent picture of telomere heterochromatin formation.     

Telomere architecture

Telomeres are protein–DNA complexes that cap chromosome ends and protect them from being recognized and processed as DNA breaks. Loss of capping function results in genetic instability and loss of cellular viability. The emerging view is that maintenance of an appropriate telomere structure is essential for function. Structural information on telomeric proteins that bind to double and single-stranded telomeric DNA shows that, despite a lack of extensive amino-acid sequence conservation, telomeric DNA recognition occurs via conserved DNA-binding domains. Furthermore, telomeric proteins have multidomain structures and hence are conformationally flexible. A possibility is that telomeric proteins take up different conformations when bound to different partners, providing a simple mechanism for modulating telomere architecture.     

A ‘higher order’ of telomere regulation: telomere heterochromatin and telomeric RNAs

Protection of chromosome ends from DNA repair and degradation activities is mediated by specialized protein complexes bound to telomere repeats. Recently, it has become apparent that epigenetic regulation of the telomric chromatin template critically impacts on telomere function and telomere‐length homeostasis from yeast to man. Across all species, telomeric repeats as well as the adjacent subtelomeric regions carry features of repressive chromatin. Disruption of this silent chromatin environment results in loss of telomere‐length control and increased telomere recombination. In turn, progressive telomere loss reduces chromatin compaction at telomeric and subtelomeric domains. The recent discoveries of telomere chromatin regulation during early mammalian development, as well as during nuclear reprogramming, further highlights a central role of telomere chromatin changes in ontogenesis. In addition, telomeres were recently shown to generate long, non‐coding RNAs that remain associated to telomeric chromatin and will provide new insights into the regulation of telomere length and telomere chromatin. In this review, we will discuss the epigenetic regulation of telomeres across species, with special emphasis on mammalian telomeres. We will also discuss the links between epigenetic alterations at mammalian telomeres and telomere‐associated diseases.