Difference in sperm head volume as a theoretical basis for sorting X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa: potentials and limitations

Volume-based sorting of X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm cells could be an interesting alternative to the existing technique based on DNA content. Advantages would be that DNA staining and ultraviolet excitation, used in the existing technique, could be avoided. To assess the possibilities and limitations of sperm-head volume as sorting criterion, achievable purity and yield are determined for bull sperm. Two important parameters in this respect are the magnitude of the volume difference and the biological variation within each (X or Y) population. Earlier, we established a difference in volume matching the difference in DNA content (3.8%) between X- and Y-bearing bull sperm heads by comparing thicknesses and areas of high numbers of pre-sorted X- and Y-bearing bull sperm heads by interference microscopy and subsequent image analysis. Unfortunately, despite the high number of measurements, a direct determination of biological variations was not possible due to an unknown contribution of instrumental variations. In this paper, we determine the contribution of instrumental errors by measuring a single sperm head, varying parameters such as location in the image, orientation angle, focusing etc., simulating the behavior of the measuring system. After correction, both for the instrumental variation, and for the fact that the original samples were not pure, biological variations in volume of 5.9 +/- 0.8% were found. Our results indicate that when 10% of the bull sperm are sorted on basis of their head volume, a theoretical enrichment of 80% could be achieved. Expected purity and yield are lower than what is standard for the existing technique. At the moment, a technique to physically separate X- and Y-bearing sperm cells based on volume is not available. However, for applications for which the potential hazards of DNA staining and UV excitation are problematic, the development of such technique should be considered.     

Interferometry in flow to sort unstained X- and Y-chromosome-bearing bull spermatozoa

BACKGROUND: It was found earlier that the difference in volume between unstained X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm heads could be detected using interference microscopy in visible light. This could be the basis for an alternative to the conventional method to sort X and Y sperm, which uses DNA staining and ultraviolet (UV)-excitation that may be harmful to sperm cells. A novel technique is introduced combining interferometry with flow cytometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interference optics were built into an existing flow cytometer/cell sorter and used to sort fresh unstained bull sperm cells on the basis of their head volume. Sorted fractions were stained with a DNA stain, and reanalyzed using the conventional method. RESULTS: Purities between 60-66% were found in both X- and Y-enriched fractions. It was possible to sort up to 300 cells per second. The system was found to be less sensitive to the orientation of sperm cells than the conventional method. CONCLUSIONS: Interferometry can be combined with flow cytometry and used to obtain significantly enriched fractions of X- and Y-bearing sperm without staining and UV light. Sorting speeds and purities at this point, however, are much lower than with the conventional method.     

Comparison of detergent-solubilized membrane and soluble proteins from flow cytometrically sorted X- and Y-chromosome bearing porcine spermatozoa by high resolution 2-D electrophoresis

The only known and measurable difference between X- and Y-chromosome bearing spermatozoa is the small difference in their DNA content. The X sperm in the human carry 2.8% more DNA than the Y sperm, while in domestic livestock this difference ranges from 3.0 to 4.2%. The only successful sperm separation method, flow cytometric sorting, is based on this difference in DNA content. Using this technique, X and Y sperm populations with purities greater than 90% can be obtained. The number of spermatozoa that can be sorted in a given time period, however, is too low for application of this technique in routine artificial insemination. Therefore, the search for a marker other than DNA to differentiate between X and Y sperm remains of interest in order to develop a method for large scale X and Y sperm separation. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether porcine X and Y sperm contain some difference in their plasma membrane proteins. The flow cytometric sorting of sperm enabled a direct comparison of the proteins of the X and Y sperm populations High resolution two-dimensional (2-D) electrophoresis was used; however, adaptations were needed to enable its use for analysis of proteins of flow cytometrically sorted sperm, both in the sorting procedure, membrane protein solubilization, and in the 2-D electrophoresis. Up to 1,000 protein spots per gel could be detected and quantified. Comparison of the 2-D protein patterns revealed differences in protein spots between sperm of two individual boars. However, no differences in protein spots between the X and Y sperm fractions were found. These results provide additional support for the view that X- and Y-chromosome bearing spermatozoa are phenotypically identical, and cast doubt on the likelihood that a surface marker can provide a base for X and Y sperm separation. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Do X and Y spermatozoa differ in proteins?

This article reviews the current knowledge about X- and Y-chromosomal gene expression during spermatogenesis and possible differences between X- and Y-chromosome-bearing spermatozoa (X and Y sperm) in relation to whether an immunological method of separation of X and Y spermatozoa might some day be feasible. Recent studies demonstrated that X- and Y-chromosome-bearing spermatids do express X- and Y-chromosomal genes that might theoretically result in protein differences between X and Y sperm. Most, if not all, of these gene products, however, are expected to be shared among X and Y spermatids via intercellular bridges. Studies on aberrant mouse strains indicate that complete sharing might not occur for all gene products. This keeps open the possibility that X and Y sperm may differ in proteins, but until now, this has not been confirmed by comparative studies between flow-cytometrically sorted X and Y sperm for H-Y antigen or other membrane proteins.     

Sex preselection in rabbits: live births from X and Y sperm separated by DNA and cell sorting

Intact, viable X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm populations of the rabbit were separated according to DNA content with a flow cytometer/cell sorter. Reanalysis for DNA of an aliquot from each sorted population showed purities of 86% for X-bearing sperm and 81% for Y-bearing sperm populations. Sorted sperm were surgically inseminated into the uterus of rabbits. From does inseminated with sorted X-bearing sperm, 94% of the offspring born were females. From does inseminated with sorted Y-bearing sperm from the same ejaculates, 81% of the offspring were males. The probability of the phenotypic sex ratios differing from 50:50 were p less than 0.0003 for X-sorted sperm and p less than 0.004 for Y-sorted sperm. Thus, the phenotypic sex ratio at birth was accurately predicted from the flow-cytometrically measured proportion of X- and Y-bearing sperm used for insemination.     

Verification of flow cytometorically-sorted X- and Y-bearing porcine spermatozoa and reanalysis of spermatozoa for DNA content using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique

Flow cytometric sperm sorting based on X and Y sperm DNA difference has been established as the only effective method for sexing the spermatozoa of mammals. The standard method for verifying the purity of sorted X and Y spermatozoa has been to reanalyze sorted sperm aliquots. We verified the purity of flow-sorted porcine X and Y spermatozoa and accuracy of DNA reanalysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using chromosome Y and 1 DNA probe. Eight ejaculates from 4 boars were sorted according to the Beltsville Sperm Sexing method. Porcine chromosome Y- and chromosome 1-specific DNA probes were used on sorted sperm populations in combination with FISH. Aliquots of the sorted sperm samples were reanalyzed for DNA content by flow cytometry. The purity of the sorted X-bearing spermatozoa was 87.4% for FISH and 87.0% for flow cytometric reanalysis; purity for the sorted Y-bearing spermatozoa was 85.9% for FISH and 84.8% for flow cytometric reanalysis. A total of 4,424 X sperm cells and 4,256 Y sperm cells was examined by FISH across the 8 ejaculates. For flow cytometry, 5,000 sorted X spermatozoa and 5,000 Y spermatozoa were reanalyzed for DNA content for each ejaculate. These results confirm the high purity of flow sorted porcine X and Y sperm cells and the validity of reanalysis of DNA in determining the proportions of X- and Y-sorted spermatozoa from viewing thousands of individual sperm chromosomes directly using FISH.     

Quantification of the X- and Y-chromosome-bearing spermatozoa of domestic animals by flow cytometry

The relative content of DNA in spermatozoa presumed to be the X- and Y-chromosome-bearing gametes from bulls, boars, rams and rabbits and the amount of DNA in spermatozoa of cockerels was determined by flow cytometry. Differences in the relative content of DNA and proportions of the presumed X- and Y-sperm populations in cryopreserved semen from Holstein, Jersey, Angus, Hereford and Brahman bulls were also determined. Spermatozoa were washed by centrifugation using a series of dimethyl sulfoxide solutions made in isotonic sodium citrate, fixed in ethanol, treated with papain and dithioerythritol to loosen the chromatin structure and remove cellular organelles, and stained quantitatively for DNA with the fluorochrome 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Approximately 5000 stained sperm nuclei, which were nonviable due to the removal of other cellular organelles during the washing procedure, were measured for DNA in an epi-illumination flow cytometer. A single distinct peak for cockerel spermatozoa and two symmetrical, overlapping peaks for species with X- and Y-spermatozoa were seen. This and other evidence strongly supports the interpretation that the peaks represent the X- and Y-sperm populations. The content of DNA in sperm nuclei from cockerels, bulls, boars, rams and rabbits, as determined by fluorescence flow cytometry, corresponded to biochemical estimates of DNA per sperm cell. Analyses of the bimodal histograms by computer-fitting two Gaussian distributions to the data showed the means of the peaks differed by 3.9, 3.7, 4.1 and 3.9% for bulls, boars, rams and rabbits, respectively. In four replicate analyses of semen from 25 bulls representing 5 breeds, the average population of sperm nuclei in the Y-peaks ranged from 49.5 to 50.5% for all breeds. The X-Y peak differences did not vary within each breed, but were significantly different when the breeds were compared. Spermatozoa from Jersey bulls had larger X-Y peak differences (P less than 0.001) than spermatozoa from Holstein, Hereford, and Angus bulls; spermatozoa from Brahman bulls had smaller X-Y differences (P less than 0.004). It is suggested from the evidence obtained in these studies that flow cytometry can be used to assess the proportion of X- and Y-spermatozoa in semen of domestic animals and is thereby applicable to verification of the effectiveness of enrichment techniques for X- or Y-spermatozoa.     

Hoechst 33342: the dye that enabled differentiation of living X-and Y-chromosome bearing mammalian sperm

Hoechst 33342 is the fluorophore used routinely to measure DNA in X- and Y-chromosome-bearing mammalian sperm so they can be separated by flow sorting. A difference of <3% in DNA mass can be detected. This synthetic dye consists of two adjacent benzimidazole rings with N-methyl-piperazine and phenolic groups at the ends. The molecule permeates the cell membrane of living cells and binds selectively to A-T base pairs exposed in the minor-groove of double stranded DNA. Capability to distinguish and separate X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm has led to artificial insemination of somewhere around a million female mammals. Offspring with obvious abnormalities are no more frequent than after insemination of unsorted sperm into cows, horses, humans, pigs, sheep, rabbits, dolphins and other mammals. There is no apparent genotoxic effect from exposure of sperm to Hoechst 33342, although information on cellular toxicity or development of embryos resulting from Hoechst 33342-stained sperm is less reassuring. Little is known about the fate of sperm-delivered Hoechst dye in the female reproductive tract or on progeny of resultant offspring.     

Incidence of chromosome aberrations in mammalian sperm stained with Hoechst 33342 and UV-laser irradiated during flow sorting

The separation of two sperm populations is possible using the technique of flow sorting, provided that a significant difference exists in the DNA content of X- and Y-bearing sperm. In order to ascertain whether or not chromosome damage was induced in sorted sperm, chromosome preparations were made from isolated sperm that had been microinjected into hamster eggs. While egg chromosomes exhibited a low frequency of chromosome aberrations, ranging from 4 to 7%, a large proportion of sperm cells exhibited chromosome damage. Between 29% of unstained and unsorted sperm and 38% of stained and unsorted sperm exhibited some type of chromosomal abnormality and this proportion increased to 50% in sorted sperm. If only damaged sperm nuclei are considered, the two unsorted sperm groups had a mean of 0.6 breaks, 0.8 triradial exchanges, and 0.2 quadriradial exchanges per nucleus. However, sorted sperm, which were stained with a fluorochrome and exposed to UV-laser irradiation, exhibited a mean of 2.9 breaks, 2.6 triradial, and 1.9 quadriradial exchanges per nucleus in which damage occurred. These observations indicate that the treatments and manipulations to which sperm nuclei are subjected during flow sorting cause chromosomal aberrations, and that exposure of the cells to UV-laser irradiation contributes substantially to the chromosome damage observed.     

Morphological and ultrastructural characterization of mammalian spermatozoa processed for flow cytometric DNA analyses

The morphological and ultrastructural changes that occur during preparation of porcine, bovine, and murine spermatozoa for flow cytometric quantification of the relative DNA content of the X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm populations were examined. Ejaculated spermatozoa from the boar and bull were washed using a series of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solutions prior to fixation, whereas the epididymal mouse spermatozoa were washed only in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Spermatozoa from all three species were then fixed in ethanol and processed for fluorochrome staining by a treatment regimen consisting of sulfhydryl reduction and proteolysis. The processed sperm nuclei were stained for DNA with the fluorochrome, 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) before quantification by flow cytometry. Scanning and transmission electron micrographs of sperm heads taken at various steps of the preparation and staining procedures show 1) that the rigorous washing procedure disrupted the plasma and outer acrosomal membranes, 2) that ethanol fixation resulted in removal of the outer membranes and disintegration of the nuclear envelope, and 3) that thiol and proteolysis treatment removed the remaining cellular organelles including the tail and rapidly induced partial decondensation of the tightly packed chromatin. Sequential micrographs showed that the nuclear matrix of all three species increased in thickness about twofold during the preparation and staining. Consequently, the harsh procedures currently used for quantitative staining of DNA for high-resolution flow cytometric analyses destroy most cellular organelles and thereby prevent simultaneous characterization of DNA content and other sperm cell constituents.     

Sex preselection: high-speed flow cytometric sorting of X and Y sperm for maximum efficiency

Sex preselection that is based on flow-cytometric measurement of sperm DNA content to enable sorting of X- from Y-chromosome-bearing sperm has proven reproducible at various locations and with many species at greater than 90% purity. Offspring of the predetermined sex in both domestic animals and human beings have been born using this technology since its introduction in 1989. The method involves treating sperm with the fluorescent dye, Hoechst 33342, which binds to the DNA and then sorting them into X- and Y-bearing-sperm populations with a flow cytometer/cell sorter modified specifically for sperm. Sexed sperm are then used with differing semen delivery routes such as intra-uterine, intra-tubal, artificial insemination (deep-uterine and cervical), in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Offspring produced at all locations using the technology have been morphologically normal and reproductively capable in succeeding generations. With the advent of high-speed cell sorting technology and improved efficiency of sorting by a new sperm orienting nozzle, the efficiency of sexed sperm production is significantly enhanced. This paper describes development of the these technological improvements in the Beltsville Sexing Technology that has brought sexed sperm to a new level of application. Under typical conditions the high-speed sperm sorter with the orienting nozzle (HiSON) results in purities of 90% of X- and Y-bearing sperm at 6 million sperm per h for each population. Taken to its highest performance level, the HiSON has produced X-bearing-sperm populations at 85 to 90% purity in the production of up to 11 million X-bearing-sperm per h of sorting. In addition if one accepts a lower purity (75 to 80%) of X, nearly 20 million sperm can be sorted per h. The latter represents a 30 to 60-fold improvement over the 1989 sorting technology using rabbit sperm. It is anticipated that with instrument refinements the production capacity can be improved even further. The application of the current technology has led to much wider potential for practical usage through conventional and deep-uterine artificial insemination of many species, especially cattle. It also opens the possibility of utilizing sexed sperm for artificial insemination in swine once low-sperm-dose methods are perfected. Sexed sperm on demand has become a reality through the development of the HiSON system.     

Sex preselection: laboratory validation of the sperm sex ratio of flow sorted X- and Y-sperm by sort reanalysis for DNA

Laboratory validation is essential in developing an effective method for separating X and Y sperm to preselect sex. Utilizing sexed sperm from a particular experiment to test fertility and achieve the subsequent phenotypic sex without knowing the likely outcome at conception is too costly for most applications. Further, research advances need to be built on an ongoing assessment with respect to the collection of data to continue progress towards achieving a successful outcome. The Beltsville Sperm Sexing Technology, which is based on the sorting of X- and Y-bearing sperm through the process of flow-cytometric sperm sorting, is also well suited for validation in the laboratory by "sort reanalysis" of the sperm X- and Y-bearing fractions for DNA content. Since the sexing technology is based on the use of Hoechst 33342, a permeant nuclear DNA stain for sorting X- and Y-bearing sperm, it also can be the marker for determining the proportions of X and Y populations by sort reanalysis. The process consists of using an aliquot of the sorted sperm and sonicating to obtain sperm nuclei. The uniformity of the nuclear staining is re-established through the addition of more Hoechst 33342. Separate analysis of each aliquot produces a histogram that is fitted to a double gaussian curve to determine proportions of X and Y populations. The relative breadths of the distributions of DNA of X- and Y-bearing sperm within a species affects interpretations of the histogram. Sort reanalysis is consistently repeatable with differences in X/Y DNA equal to or greater than 3.0%. This information on sex ratio of the sperm then provides the precise tool by which one can predict the outcome in terms of sex, from a particular sample of semen. Simple analysis of unsorted sperm to determine the proportions of X- and Y-bearing sperm based on DNA content is also an effective tool for validating sperm-sex ratio, whether it is in a sample assumed to be 50:50 or predicted to be something other than 50:50. This simple analysis provides for a check on the potential sex ratio of any sample of semen.     

History of commercializing sexed semen for cattle

Although the basic principles controlling the sex of mammalian offspring have been known for a relatively long time, recent application of certain modern cellular methodologies has led to development of a flow cytometric system capable of differentiating and separating living X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm in amounts suitable for AI and therefore, commercialization of this sexing technology. After a very long history of unsuccessful attempts to differentiate between mammalian sperm that produce males from those that produce females, a breakthrough came in 1981 when it was demonstrated that precise DNA content could be measured. Although these initial measurements of DNA content killed the sperm in the process, they led to the ultimate development of a sperm sorting system that was capable, not only of differentiating between live X- and Y-sperm, but of sorting them into relatively pure X- and Y-sperm populations without obvious cellular damage. Initial efforts to predetermine the sex of mammalian offspring in 1989 required surgical insemination, but later enhancements provided sex-sorted sperm in quantities suitable for use with IVF. Subsequent advances in flow sorting provided minimal numbers of sperm sufficient for use in AI. It was not until the flow cytometric sorting system was improved greatly and successful cryopreservation of sex-sorted bull sperm was developed that efficacious approaches to commercialization of sexed semen could be implemented worldwide in cattle. A number of companies now offer sex-sorted bovine sperm. Innovative approaches by a diverse group of scientists along with advances in computer science, biophysics, cell biology, instrumentation, and applied reproductive physiology provided the basis for commercializing sexed semen in cattle.     

Feasibility of sex-sorting sperm from the white and the black rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum, Diceros bicornis)

The objective of these studies was to investigate the practicality of flow cytometric sex-sorting for spermatozoa from the white and the black rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum, Diceros bicornis). In Experiment 1, four semen extenders were tested regarding their suitability for liquid preservation of spermatozoa before sorting. Dilution in MES-HEPES-based semen extender followed by incubation generated best sperm quality parameters (motility, viability, and acrosome integrity). In Experiment 2, the effect of staining method (15 °C for 4 to 6 h during transport or 37 °C for 1 to 1.5 h) on sort efficiency and sperm quality was investigated. Staining at 15 °C during transport resulted in a higher percentage of sperm samples showing a resolution of X- and Y-chromosome-bearing populations (60%) compared with that for staining at 37 °C after transport (33%) and resulted in superior sperm integrity after staining (43.8 ± 11.3% vs. 19.6 ± 12.1%). Sort rate was 300 to 700 cells/sec and sort purity, determined for one sorted sample, was 94% for X-chromosome-bearing spermatozoa. In Experiment 3, the highly viscous component of rhinoceros seminal plasma, which complicates the process of sperm sorting, was examined by gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Results suggested a 250-kDa glycoprotein (most likely originating from the bulbourethral gland) to be responsible for the characteristic viscosity of ejaculates. In Experiment 4, viscosity of seminal plasma, as measured by electron spin resonance spectroscopy, was significantly decreased after addition of α-amylase or collagenase (0.5 and 3 IU per 100 μL seminal plasma, respectively) by 28% and 21%, respectively, with no negative effect on sperm characteristics. The results of this study demonstrate for the first time that rhinoceros spermatozoa can be successfully sorted into high-purity X- and Y-chromosome-bearing populations. Furthermore, the successful liquefaction of viscous ejaculates provides the means to greatly improve sort-efficiency in this species.     

Flow sorting of X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa into two populations

The only established difference on which to base the separation of X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa is chromosomal constitution. This difference is quantifiable both from chromosome morphology (karyotype) and from DNA content. Flow cytometric techniques were used to measure relative DNA content of the X and Y populations and to flow-sort spermatozoa from Chinchilla laniger. Epididymal spermatozoa were recovered in PBS, fixed in 80% ethanol, treated with papain and dithioerythritol, and stained for DNA with Hoechst 33342. Sperm nuclei were analyzed and sorted on an EPICS V flow cytometer/cell sorter, modified specifically for spermatozoa. Two clearly resolved peaks (coefficient of variation < 1.5%) with approximately 7.5% difference in DNA content between X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa were evident. Sperm nuclei were sorted from a portion of the X and Y peaks at a rate of 55 nuclei/sec for each population. Purities of individual X and Y populations averaged 95% as determined by reanalysis of the sorted populations. Successful sorting of Chinchilla X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa into separate populations may aid in the identification of a biochemical marker that could be used to discriminate between the two sperm populations and lead to a practical procedure for sexing spermatozoa.     

Advances in flow cytometry for sperm sexing

This review presents the key technological developments that have been implemented in the 20 years since the first reports of successful measurement, sorting, insemination and live births using flow cytometry as a proven physical sperm separation technique. Since the first reports of sexed sperm, flow technology efforts have been largely focused on improving sample throughput by increasing the rate at which sperm are introduced to the sorter, and on improving measurement resolution, which has increased the proportion of cells that can be reliably measured and sorted. Today, routine high-purity sorting of X- or Y-chromosome-bearing sperm can be achieved at rates up to 8000 s⁻¹ for an input rate of 40,000 X- and Y- sperm s⁻¹. With current protocols, straws of sex-sorted sperm intended for use in artificial insemination contain approximately 2 × 10⁶ sperm. The sort rate of 8000 sperm s⁻¹ mentioned above corresponds to a production capacity of approximately 14 straws of each sex per hour per instrument.     

Development of bovine embryos after in vitro fertilization of oocytes with flow cytometrically sorted, stained and unsorted sperm from different bulls

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of staining bovine sperm, with or without flow cytometry, on in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes and blastocyst development. Bovine oocytes (n=4273) were fertilized with frozen–thawed sperm from three bulls that was: stained with Hoechst 33342 and sorted (into X- or Y-chromosome-bearing sperm) with flow cytometry; stained but not sorted; and not stained or sorted (Control). Oocytes, aspirated from slaughterhouse ovaries, were matured in TCM199 (supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 15 ng FSH, 1.0 μg LH, 1.0 μg E2/ml) for 22–24 h at 39 °C in 5% CO₂ in air with maximum humidity. Presumptive zygotes were removed from culture and placed in chemically defined medium (CDM-1) 6–7 h after insemination and cultured for 65–66 h. Embryos that had cleaved by 72 h post-insemination were cultured an additional 96 h in CDM-2 containing 0.12 IU insulin/ml. Cleavage and blastocyst rates per oocyte inseminated were recorded on Day 3 and Days 7–8 after insemination, respectively. There was no significant difference in blastocyst rate among the three types of sperm; however, cleavage rates with stained and sorted sperm (53.1%) and unsorted, stained sperm (59.9%) were lower (P<0.05) than Control sperm (69.7%). Furthermore, there were significant differences due to semen from different bulls in cleavage and blastocyst rates.     

Advances in deep uterine insemination: a fruitful way forward to exploit new sperm technologies in cattle

After clarifying regions of the female tract wherein spermatozoa are stored and the egg is fertilised, proposals are made for a modified site of sperm deposition in cattle. A deep pre-ovulatory insemination into the ipsilateral horn of the uterus-the side of the ovulatory follicle-should improve establishment of viable spermatozoa in the caudal region of the oviduct isthmus, the so-called functional sperm reservoir. Suppressed motility within viscous secretions and binding of sperm heads to endosalpingeal microvilli are features of this phase of storage. Activation and release of such spermatozoa would be prompted by imminent ovulation and associated ovarian endocrine programming by both local and systemic routes. Potential advantages of deep insemination include: (1) raising the fertility of genetically valuable bulls whose non-return rates are sub-optimal; (2) reducing the number of spermatozoa in each insemination dose; (3) exploiting the limited numbers of sex-selected sperm cells (X- and Y-chromosome-bearing spermatozoa) available from flow cytometry; (4) breeding from valuable but oligospermic bulls. Putative disadvantages might include: (1) rectal palpation of the ovaries to identify the pre-ovulatory follicle; (2) damage to or even perforation of the uterine wall by the insemination device; (3) the risk of polyspermic fertilisation; (4) specific training in the technique for non-clinically qualified inseminators. Each of these reservations receives comment. In conclusion, a modified technique of insemination should be feasible under commercial conditions, could be coupled with new sperm technologies, and would give a boost to the artificial insemination industry.     

Gender preselection in cattle with intracytoplasmically injected, flow cytometrically sorted sperm heads

We investigated the development to the blastocyst and subsequent live-offspring stages of in vitro-matured bovine oocytes intracytoplasmically injected with flow cytometrically sorted bull sperm heads. Bull sperm heads, prepared by ultrasound sonication, were distinguished and sorted on the basis of their relative DNA contents using a flow cytometer/cell sorter modified for sorting sperm. By fluorescence in situ hybridization, the proportion of sperm confirmed as having Y specific DNA in the fraction sorted for the Y sperm was 82%. Injection with single sorted sperm heads of in vitro-matured oocytes (cultured for 24 h) resulted in 46.6% cleavage and 6.9% blastocyst development rates. Embryo transfer of 48 blastocysts (Days 7-8) to recipients (one per recipient) resulted in 20.8% pregnancy and 20.8% normal live offspring production rates. The birth of 8 male and 2 female calves represents an 80% sex preselection accuracy rate.     

Flow cytometric sorting of non-human primate sperm nuclei

Pre-determination of the sex of offspring has implications for management and conservation of captive wildlife species, particularly those with single sex-dominated social structures. Our goal is to adapt flow cytometry technology to sort spermatozoa of non-human primate species for use with assisted reproductive technologies. The objectives of this study were to: (i) determine the difference in DNA content between X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa (ii) sort sperm nuclei into X- and Y-enriched samples; and (iii) assess the accuracy of sorting. Spermatozoa were collected from two common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), seven hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) and two common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Human spermatozoa from one male were used as a control. Sperm nuclei were stained (Hoechst 33342), incubated and analyzed using a high-speed cell sorter. Flow cytometric reanalysis of sorted samples (sort reanalysis, 10,000 events/sample) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; 500 sperm nuclei/sample) were used to evaluate accuracy of sorting. Based on fluorescence intensity of X- and Y-bearing sperm nuclei, the difference in DNA content between X and Y populations was 4.09 +/- 0.03, 4.20 +/- 0.03, 3.30 +/- 0.01, and 2.97 +/- 0.05%, for marmoset, baboon, chimpanzee and human, respectively. Sort reanalysis and FISH results were similar; combined data revealed high levels of purity for X- and Y-enriched samples (94 +/- 0.9 and 93 +/- 0.8%, 94 +/- 0.7 and 94 +/- 0.5%, 91 +/- 0.9 and 97 +/- 0.6%, 94 +/- 0.6 and 94 +/- 0.9%, for marmoset, baboon, chimpanzee and human, respectively). These data indicate the potential for high-purity sorting of spermatozoa from non-human primates.