Developmentally restricted synaptic plasticity in a songbird nucleus required for song learning

We provide evidence here of long-term synaptic plasticity in a songbird forebrain area required for song learning, the lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior neostriatum (LMAN). Pairing postsynaptic bursts in LMAN principal neurons with stimulation of recurrent collateral synapses had two effects: spike timing- and NMDA receptor-dependent LTP of the recurrent synapses, and LTD of thalamic afferent synapses that were stimulated out of phase with the postsynaptic bursting. Both types of plasticity were restricted to the sensory critical period for song learning, consistent with a role for each in sensory learning. The properties of the observed plasticity are appropriate to establish recurrent circuitry within LMAN that reflects the spatiotemporal pattern of thalamic afferent activity evoked by tutor song. Such circuit organization could represent a tutor song memory suitable for reinforcing particular vocal sequences during sensorimotor learning.     

The Formation of Multi-synaptic Connections by the Interaction of Synaptic and Structural Plasticity and Their Functional Consequences

Cortical connectivity emerges from the permanent interaction between neuronal activity and synaptic as well as structural plasticity. An important experimentally observed feature of this connectivity is the distribution of the number of synapses from one neuron to another, which has been measured in several cortical layers. All of these distributions are bimodal with one peak at zero and a second one at a small number (3–8) of synapses.In this study, using a probabilistic model of structural plasticity, which depends on the synaptic weights, we explore how these distributions can emerge and which functional consequences they have.We find that bimodal distributions arise generically from the interaction of structural plasticity with synaptic plasticity rules that fulfill the following biological realistic constraints: First, the synaptic weights have to grow with the postsynaptic activity. Second, this growth curve and/or the input-output relation of the postsynaptic neuron have to change sub-linearly (negative curvature). As most neurons show such input-output-relations, these constraints can be fulfilled by many biological reasonable systems.Given such a system, we show that the different activities, which can explain the layer-specific distributions, correspond to experimentally observed activities.Considering these activities as working point of the system and varying the pre- or postsynaptic stimulation reveals a hysteresis in the number of synapses. As a consequence of this, the connectivity between two neurons can be controlled by activity but is also safeguarded against overly fast changes.These results indicate that the complex dynamics between activity and plasticity will, already between a pair of neurons, induce a variety of possible stable synaptic distributions, which could support memory mechanisms.     

Bidirectional plasticity gated by hyperpolarization controls the gain of postsynaptic firing responses at central vestibular nerve synapses

Linking synaptic plasticity with behavioral learning requires understanding how synaptic efficacy influences postsynaptic firing in neurons whose role in behavior is understood. Here, we examine plasticity at a candidate site of motor learning: vestibular nerve synapses onto neurons that mediate reflexive movements. Pairing nerve activity with changes in postsynaptic voltage induced bidirectional synaptic plasticity in vestibular nucleus projection neurons: long-term potentiation relied on calcium-permeable AMPA receptors and postsynaptic hyperpolarization, whereas long-term depression relied on NMDA receptors and postsynaptic depolarization. Remarkably, both forms of plasticity uniformly scaled synaptic currents evoked by pulse trains, and these changes in synaptic efficacy were translated into linear increases or decreases in postsynaptic firing responses. Synapses onto local inhibitory neurons were also plastic but expressed only long-term depression. Bidirectional, linear gain control of vestibular nerve synapses onto projection neurons provides a plausible mechanism for motor learning underlying adaptation of vestibular reflexes.     

Target neuron specification of short-term synaptic facilitation and depression in the cricket CNS

We investigated the role of retrograde signals in the regulation of short-term synaptic depression and facilitation by characterizing the form of plasticity expressed at novel synapses on four giant interneurons in the cricket cercal sensory system. We induced the formation of novel synapses by transplanting a mesothoracic leg and its associated sensory neurons to the cricket terminal abdominal segment. Axons of ectopic leg sensory neurons regenerated and innervated the host terminal abdominal ganglion forming monosynaptic connections with the medial giant interneuron (MGI), lateral giant interneuron (LGI), and interneurons 7-1a and 9-2a. The plasticity expressed by these synapses was characterized by stimulating a sensory neuron with pairs of stimuli at various frequencies or with trains of 10 stimuli delivered at 100 Hz and measuring the change in excitatory postsynaptic potential amplitude recorded in the postsynaptic neuron. Novel synapses of a leg tactile hair on 7-1a depressed, as did control synapses of cercal sensory neurons on this interneuron. Novel synapses of leg campaniform sensilla (CS) sensory neurons on MGI, like MGI's control synapses, always facilitated. The form of plasticity expressed by novel synapses is thus consistent with that observed at control synapses. Leg CS synapses with 9-2a also facilitated; however, the plasticity expressed by these sensory neurons is dependent on the identity of the postsynaptic cell since the synapses these same sensory neurons formed with LGI always depressed. We conclude that the form of plasticity expressed at these synaptic connections is determined retrogradely by the postsynaptic cell. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Neurobiol 37: 700–714, 1998     

AMPA receptor trafficking at excitatory synapses

Excitatory synapses in the CNS release glutamate, which acts primarily on two sides of ionotropic receptors: AMPA receptors and NMDA receptors. AMPA receptors mediate the postsynaptic depolarization that initiates neuronal firing, whereas NMDA receptors initiate synaptic plasticity. Recent studies have emphasized that distinct mechanisms control synaptic expression of these two receptor classes. Whereas NMDA receptor proteins are relatively fixed, AMPA receptors cycle synaptic membranes on and off. A large family of interacting proteins regulates AMPA receptor turnover at synapses and thereby influences synaptic strength. Furthermore, neuronal activity controls synaptic AMPA receptor trafficking, and this dynamic process plays a key role in the synaptic plasticity that is thought to underlie aspects of learning and memory.     

A tale of timing and transport

Excitatory and inhibitory synapses show long-term plasticity, but spike timing-dependent plasticity was seen only at excitatory connections. No longer. In this issue of Neuron, Woodin et al. demonstrate that coincident pre- and postsynaptic activity acts on the neuronal K+/Cl- cotransporter KCC2 to shift the reversal potential for Cl- and thus alters the effectiveness of GABAergic synapses.     

Local presynaptic activity gates homeostatic changes in presynaptic function driven by dendritic BDNF synthesis

Homeostatic synaptic plasticity is important for maintaining stability of neuronal function, but heterogeneous expression mechanisms suggest that distinct facets of neuronal activity may shape the manner in which compensatory synaptic changes are implemented. Here, we demonstrate that local presynaptic activity gates a retrograde form of homeostatic plasticity induced by blockade of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) in cultured hippocampal neurons. We show that AMPAR blockade produces rapid (<3 hr) protein synthesis-dependent increases in both presynaptic and postsynaptic function and that the induction of presynaptic, but not postsynaptic, changes requires coincident local activity in presynaptic terminals. This "state-dependent" modulation of presynaptic function requires postsynaptic release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as a retrograde messenger, which is locally synthesized in dendrites in response to AMPAR blockade. Taken together, our results reveal a local crosstalk between active presynaptic terminals and postsynaptic signaling that dictates the manner by which homeostatic plasticity is implemented at synapses.     

Long-term synaptic plasticity in hippocampal interneurons

Rapid memory formation relies, at least in part, on long-term potentiation (LTP) of excitatory synapses. Inhibitory interneurons of the hippocampus, which are essential for information processing, have recently been found to exhibit not one, but two forms of LTP. One form resembles LTP that occurs in pyramidal neurons, which depends on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and is triggered by coincident pre- and postsynaptic activity. The other depends on Ca2+ influx through glutamate receptors that preferentially open when the postsynaptic neuron is at rest. Here we review these contrasting forms of LTP and describe how they are mirrored by two forms of long-term depression. We further discuss how the remarkable plasticity of glutamatergic synapses on interneurons greatly enhances the computational capacity of the cortical microcircuit.     

Synapses identifiable in the parietal ganglia of the snail Helix lucorum

The synaptic plasticity is a background for learning and memory. Identifiable synapses that are the synapses between individually identifiable neurons are a very convenient model for studying plasticity. Synapses between the interoceptive mechanosensory neurons and the command neurons of the withdrawal behavior were identified in the Helix lucorum brain. It was shown that synaptic plasticity estimated by the dynamics of the elementary postsynaptic potentials elicited by single presynaptic spikes differed from the synaptic plasticity estimated by the dynamics of compound synaptic responses of the same neurons to sensory stimulation. Habituation and heterosynaptic facilitation phenomena are discussed in terms of the dynamics of the elementary postsynaptic potentials.     

AMPA receptor regulation during synaptic plasticity in hippocampus and neocortex

Discovery of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the dentate gyrus of the rabbit hippocampus by Bliss and L?mo opened up a whole new field to study activity-dependent long-term synaptic modifications in the brain. Since then hippocampal synapses have been a key model system to study the mechanisms of different forms of synaptic plasticity. At least for the postsynaptic forms of LTP and long-term depression (LTD), regulation of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) has emerged as a key mechanism. While many of the synaptic plasticity mechanisms uncovered in at the hippocampal synapses apply to synapses across diverse brain regions, there are differences in the mechanisms that often reveal the specific functional requirements of the brain area under study. Here we will review AMPAR regulation underlying synaptic plasticity in hippocampus and neocortex. The main focus of this review will be placed on postsynaptic forms of synaptic plasticity that impinge on the regulation of AMPARs using hippocampal CA1 and primary sensory cortices as examples. And through the comparison, we will highlight the key similarities and functional differences between the two synapses.     

Synaptic protein degradation by the ubiquitin proteasome system

Synaptic plasticity -- the modulation of synaptic strength between a presynaptic terminal and a postsynaptic dendrite -- is thought to be a mechanism that underlies learning and memory. It has become increasingly clear that regulated protein synthesis is an important mechanism used to regulate the protein content of synapses that results in changes in synaptic strength. Recent experiments have highlighted a role for the opposing process, that is, regulated protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system, in synaptic plasticity. These recent findings raise exciting questions as to how proteasomal activity can regulate synapses over different temporal and spatial scales.     

Ionotropic glutamate receptor trafficking--there and back again

Glutamate is a major excitatory neurotransmitter in brain. It engages mainly ionotropic glutamate receptors of AMPA and NMDA type. Thus, regulation of the number and properties of the receptors is crucial for correct neuronal communication, but also contributes to various forms of synaptic plasticity, namely neuronal development, learning and memory. Glutamate receptors are not static components of synapses. On the contrary, they are continuously delivered and removed from postsynaptic membranes and this process is regulated by synaptic activity, Receptor trafficking to synapses is a multi-step process, involving exit from endoplasmic reticulum, transport along dendrites, incorporation to postsynaptic membrane and finally removing them from synapses. The transport is regulated by numerous proteins, especially those bearing PDZ domains, or by receptors themselves.     

Neurogranin enhances synaptic strength through its interaction with calmodulin

Learning‐correlated plasticity at CA1 hippocampal excitatory synapses is dependent on neuronal activity and NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activation. However, the molecular mechanisms that transduce plasticity stimuli to postsynaptic potentiation are poorly understood. Here, we report that neurogranin (Ng), a neuron‐specific and postsynaptic protein, enhances postsynaptic sensitivity and increases synaptic strength in an activity‐ and NMDAR‐dependent manner. In addition, Ng‐mediated potentiation of synaptic transmission mimics and occludes long‐term potentiation (LTP). Expression of Ng mutants that lack the ability to bind to, or dissociate from, calmodulin (CaM) fails to potentiate synaptic transmission, strongly suggesting that regulated Ng–CaM binding is necessary for Ng‐mediated potentiation. Moreover, knocking‐down Ng blocked LTP induction. Thus, Ng–CaM interaction can provide a mechanistic link between induction and expression of postsynaptic potentiation.     

Dynamic stabilization: Structural plasticity at inhibitory postsynaptic sites

Rearrangement of molecular structures at individual synapses can contribute to network plasticity. At mossy fiber presynaptic terminals, experience regulates both connectivity and structure of individual boutons. Moreover, dendritic spines and postsynaptic densities of glutamatergic synapses rapidly form and remodel in an activity-dependent manner. Recent studies of the postsynaptic scaffold molecule gephyrin have now revealed that also inhibitory shaft synapses undergo rapid remodeling at the postsynaptic scaffold level. Taking into account that also surface membrane receptors are highly mobile, local coincidence of receptors and scaffold elements in adjacent layers at dendritic shafts might depend on regulatory processes underlying synaptic plasticity.     

Role of GABAA-Mediated Inhibition and Functional Assortment of Synapses onto Individual Layer 4 Neurons in Regulating Plasticity Expression in Visual Cortex

Layer 4 (L4) of primary visual cortex (V1) is the main recipient of thalamocortical fibers from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN_d). Thus, it is considered the main entry point of visual information into the neocortex and the first anatomical opportunity for intracortical visual processing before information leaves L4 and reaches supra- and infragranular cortical layers. The strength of monosynaptic connections from individual L4 excitatory cells onto adjacent L4 cells (unitary connections) is highly malleable, demonstrating that the initial stage of intracortical synaptic transmission of thalamocortical information can be altered by previous activity. However, the inhibitory network within L4 of V1 may act as an internal gate for induction of excitatory synaptic plasticity, thus providing either high fidelity throughput to supragranular layers or transmittal of a modified signal subject to recent activity-dependent plasticity. To evaluate this possibility, we compared the induction of synaptic plasticity using classical extracellular stimulation protocols that recruit a combination of excitatory and inhibitory synapses with stimulation of a single excitatory neuron onto a L4 cell. In order to induce plasticity, we paired pre- and postsynaptic activity (with the onset of postsynaptic spiking leading the presynaptic activation by 10ms) using extracellular stimulation (ECS) in acute slices of primary visual cortex and comparing the outcomes with our previously published results in which an identical protocol was used to induce synaptic plasticity between individual pre- and postsynaptic L4 excitatory neurons. Our results indicate that pairing of ECS with spiking in a L4 neuron fails to induce plasticity in L4-L4 connections if synaptic inhibition is intact. However, application of a similar pairing protocol under GABA_ARs inhibition by bath application of 2μM bicuculline does induce robust synaptic plasticity, long term potentiation (LTP) or long term depression (LTD), similar to our results with pairing of pre- and postsynaptic activation between individual excitatory L4 neurons in which inhibitory connections are not activated. These results are consistent with the well-established observation that inhibition limits the capacity for induction of plasticity at excitatory synapses and that pre- and postsynaptic activation at a fixed time interval can result in a variable range of plasticity outcomes. However, in the current study by virtue of having two sets of experimental data, we have provided a new insight into these processes. By randomly mixing the assorting of individual L4 neurons according to the frequency distribution of the experimentally determined plasticity outcome distribution based on the calculated convergence of multiple individual L4 neurons onto a single postsynaptic L4 neuron, we were able to compare then actual ECS plasticity outcomes to those predicted by randomly mixing individual pairs of neurons. Interestingly, the observed plasticity profiles with ECS cannot account for the random assortment of plasticity behaviors of synaptic connections between individual cell pairs. These results suggest that connections impinging onto a single postsynaptic cell may be grouped according to plasticity states.     

Transmission,Development, and Plasticity of Synapses

Chemical synapses are sites of contact and information transfer between a neuron and its partner cell. Each synapse is a specialized junction, where the presynaptic cell assembles machinery for the release of neurotransmitter, and the postsynaptic cell assembles components to receive and integrate this signal. Synapses also exhibit plasticity, during which synaptic function and/or structure are modified in response to activity. With a robust panel of genetic, imaging, and electrophysiology approaches, and strong evolutionary conservation of molecular components, Drosophila has emerged as an essential model system for investigating the mechanisms underlying synaptic assembly, function, and plasticity. We will discuss techniques for studying synapses in Drosophila, with a focus on the larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ), a well-established model glutamatergic synapse. Vesicle fusion, which underlies synaptic release of neurotransmitters, has been well characterized at this synapse. In addition, studies of synaptic assembly and organization of active zones and postsynaptic densities have revealed pathways that coordinate those events across the synaptic cleft. We will also review modes of synaptic growth and plasticity at the fly NMJ, and discuss how pre- and postsynaptic cells communicate to regulate plasticity in response to activity.     

N-cofilin can compensate for the loss of ADF in excitatory synapses

Actin plays important roles in a number of synaptic processes, including synaptic vesicle organization and exocytosis, mobility of postsynaptic receptors, and synaptic plasticity. However, little is known about the mechanisms that control actin at synapses. Actin dynamics crucially depend on LIM kinase 1 (LIMK1) that controls the activity of the actin depolymerizing proteins of the ADF/cofilin family. While analyses of mouse mutants revealed the importance of LIMK1 for both pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms, the ADF/cofilin family member n-cofilin appears to be relevant merely for postsynaptic plasticity, and not for presynaptic physiology. By means of immunogold electron microscopy and immunocytochemistry, we here demonstrate the presence of ADF (actin depolymerizing factor), a close homolog of n-cofilin, in excitatory synapses, where it is particularly enriched in presynaptic terminals. Surprisingly, genetic ablation of ADF in mice had no adverse effects on synapse structure or density as assessed by electron microscopy and by the morphological analysis of Golgi-stained hippocampal pyramidal cells. Moreover, a series of electrophysiological recordings in acute hippocampal slices revealed that presynaptic recruitment and exocytosis of synaptic vesicles as well as postsynaptic plasticity were unchanged in ADF mutant mice. The lack of synaptic defects may be explained by the elevated n-cofilin levels observed in synaptic structures of ADF mutants. Indeed, synaptic actin regulation was impaired in compound mutants lacking both ADF and n-cofilin, but not in ADF single mutants. From our results we conclude that n-cofilin can compensate for the loss of ADF in excitatory synapses. Further, our data suggest that ADF and n-cofilin cooperate in controlling synaptic actin content.     

Suppression of inhibitory synaptic potentiation by presynaptic activity through postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors in a Purkinje neuron

At inhibitory synapses on a cerebellar Purkinje neuron, the depolarization caused by heterosynaptic climbing fiber activation induces long-lasting potentiation accompanied by an increase in GABA(A) receptor responsiveness. Here we show that activation of a presynaptic inhibitory interneuron during the conditioning postsynaptic depolarization suppresses the potentiation. The suppression is due to postsynaptic GABA(B) receptor activation by GABA released from presynaptic terminals. The results suggest that GABA(B) receptor activation decreases the activity of cAMP-dependent protein kinase through the G(i)/G(o) proteins. The presynaptic activity-dependent suppression of synaptic plasticity is a novel regulatory mechanism of synaptic efficacy at individual synapses and may contribute to the learning and computational ability of the cerebellar cortex.     

miR‐124‐dependent tagging of synapses by synaptopodin enables input‐specific homeostatic plasticity

Homeostatic synaptic plasticity is a process by which neurons adjust their synaptic strength to compensate for perturbations in neuronal activity. Whether the highly diverse synapses on a neuron respond uniformly to the same perturbation remains unclear. Moreover, the molecular determinants that underlie synapse‐specific homeostatic synaptic plasticity are unknown. Here, we report a synaptic tagging mechanism in which the ability of individual synapses to increase their strength in response to activity deprivation depends on the local expression of the spine‐apparatus protein synaptopodin under the regulation of miR‐124. Using genetic manipulations to alter synaptopodin expression or regulation by miR‐124, we show that synaptopodin behaves as a “postsynaptic tag” whose translation is derepressed in a subpopulation of synapses and allows for nonuniform homeostatic strengthening and synaptic AMPA receptor stabilization. By genetically silencing individual connections in pairs of neurons, we demonstrate that this process operates in an input‐specific manner. Overall, our study shifts the current view that homeostatic synaptic plasticity affects all synapses uniformly to a more complex paradigm where the ability of individual synapses to undergo homeostatic changes depends on their own functional and biochemical state.     

The dynamic organization of postsynaptic proteins: translocating molecules regulate synaptic function

Physiological roles for postsynaptic molecules in synaptogenesis and plasticity are under intense investigation. Recent imaging experiments, including GFP-based and single-particle tracking strategies, reveal rapid movement of synaptic components to and from the postsynaptic sites. Furthermore, specific patterns of neuronal activity and/or activation of specific transmitter receptors trigger selective translocation of postsynaptic components. These emerging dynamic properties of synaptic specializations add another layer of complexity to the signaling mechanisms of CNS synapses.