Separate mechanisms act concurrently to shed and release the prion protein from the cell

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is attached to the cell membrane via its glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor and is constitutively shed into the extracellular space. Here, three different mechanisms are presented that concurrently shed PrP^C from the cell. The fast α-cleavage released a N-terminal fragment (N1) into the medium and the extreme C-terminal cleavage shed soluble full-length (FL-S) PrP and C-terminally cleaved (C1-S) fragments outside the cell. Also, a slow exosomal release of full-length (FL) and C1-fragment (C1) was demonstrated. The three separate mechanisms acting simultaneously, but with different kinetics, have to be taken into consideration when elucidating functional roles of PrP^C and also when processing of PrP^C is considered as a target for intervention in prion diseases. Further, in this study it was shown that metalloprotease inhibitors affected the extreme C-terminal cleavage and shedding of PrP^C. The metalloprotease inhibitors did not influence the α-cleavage or the exosomal release. Taken together, these results are important for understanding the different mechanisms acting in parallel in the shedding and cleavage of PrP^C.     

Unexpected Tolerance of α-Cleavage of the Prion Protein to Sequence Variations

The cellular form of the prion protein, PrP^C, undergoes extensive proteolysis at the α site (109K↓H110). Expression of non-cleavable PrP^C mutants in transgenic mice correlates with neurotoxicity, suggesting that α-cleavage is important for PrP^C physiology. To gain insights into the mechanisms of α-cleavage, we generated a library of PrP^C mutants with mutations in the region neighbouring the α-cleavage site. The prevalence of C1, the carboxy adduct of α-cleavage, was determined for each mutant. In cell lines of disparate origin, C1 prevalence was unaffected by variations in charge and hydrophobicity of the region neighbouring the α-cleavage site, and by substitutions of the residues in the palindrome that flanks this site. Instead, α-cleavage was size-dependently impaired by deletions within the domain 106–119. Almost no cleavage was observed upon full deletion of this domain. These results suggest that α-cleavage is executed by an α-PrPase whose activity, despite surprisingly limited sequence specificity, is dependent on the size of the central region of PrP^C.     

��-Cleavage of cellular prion protein

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is subjected to various processing under physiological and pathological conditions, of which the α-cleavage within the central hydrophobic domain not only disrupts a region critical for both PrP toxicity and PrP^C to PrP^Sc conversion but also produces the N1 fragment that is neuroprotective and the C1 fragment that enhances the pro-apoptotic effect of staurosporine in one report and inhibits prion in another. The proteases responsible for the α-cleavage of PrP^C are controversial. The effect of ADAM10, ADAM17, and ADAM9 on N1 secretion clearly indicates their involvement in the α-cleavage of PrP^C, but there has been no report of direct PrP^C α-cleavage activity with any of the three ADAMs in a purified protein form. We demonstrated that, in muscle cells, ADAM8 is the primary protease for the α-cleavage of PrP^C, but another unidentified protease(s) must also play a minor role. We also found that PrP^C regulates ADAM8 expression, suggesting that a close examination on the relationships between PrP^C and its processing enzymes may reveal novel roles and underlying mechanisms for PrP^C in non-prion diseases such as asthma and cancer.     

PrP overdrive

Knockout of the cellular prion protein (PrP^C) in mice is tolerated, as is complete elimination of the protein’s N-terminal domain. However, deletion of select short segments between the N- and C-terminal domains is lethal. How can one reconcile this apparent paradox? Research over the last few years demonstrates that PrP^C undergoes α-cleavage in the vicinity of residue 109 (mouse sequence) to release the bioactive N1 and C1 fragments. In biophysical studies, we recently characterized the action of relevant members of the ADAM (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase) enzyme family (ADAM8, 10, and 17) and found that they all produce α-cleavage, but at 3 distinct cleavage sites, with proteolytic efficiency modulated by the physiologic metals copper and zinc. Remarkably, the shortest lethal deletion segment in PrP^C fully encompasses the three α-cleavage sites. Analysis of all reported PrP^C deletion mutants suggests that elimination of α-cleavage, coupled with retention of the protein’s N-terminal residues, segments 23–31 and longer, confers the lethal phenotype. Interestingly, these N-terminal residues are implicated in the activation of several membrane proteins, including synaptic glutamate receptors. We propose that α-cleavage is a general mechanism essential for downregulating PrP^C’s intrinsic activity, and that blockage of proteolysis leads to constitutively active PrP^C and consequent dyshomeostasis.     

A New Paradigm for Enzymatic Control of α-Cleavage and β-Cleavage of the Prion Protein

The cellular form of the prion protein (PrP^C) is found in both full-length and several different cleaved forms in vivo. Although the precise functions of the PrP^C proteolytic products are not known, cleavage between the unstructured N-terminal domain and the structured C-terminal domain at Lys-109↓His-110 (mouse sequence), termed α-cleavage, has been shown to produce the anti-apoptotic N1 and the scrapie-resistant C1 peptide fragments. β-Cleavage, residing adjacent to the octarepeat domain and N-terminal to the α-cleavage site, is thought to arise from the action of reactive oxygen species produced from redox cycling of coordinated copper. We sought to elucidate the role of key members of the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) enzyme family, as well as Cu²⁺ redox cycling, in recombinant mouse PrP (MoPrP) cleavage through LC/MS analysis. Our findings show that although Cu²⁺ redox-generated reactive oxygen species do produce fragmentation corresponding to β-cleavage, ADAM8 also cleaves MoPrP in the octarepeat domain in a Cu²⁺- and Zn²⁺-dependent manner. Additional cleavage by ADAM8 was observed at the previously proposed location of α-cleavage, Lys-109↓His-110 (MoPrP sequencing); however, upon addition of Cu²⁺, the location of α-cleavage shifted by several amino acids toward the C terminus. ADAM10 and ADAM17 have also been implicated in α-cleavage at Lys-109↓His-110; however, we observed that they instead cleaved MoPrP at a novel location, Ala-119↓Val-120, with additional cleavage by ADAM10 at Gly-227↓Arg-228 near the C terminus. Together, our results show that MoPrP cleavage is far more complex than previously thought and suggest a mechanism by which PrP^C fragmentation responds to Cu²⁺ and Zn²⁺.     

The PrPC C1 fragment derived from the ovine A136R154R171 PRNP allele is highly abundant in sheep brain and inhibits fibrillisation of full-length PrPC protein in vitro

Expression of the cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is crucial for the development of prion diseases. Resistance to prion diseases can result from reduced availability of the prion protein or from amino acid changes in the prion protein sequence. We propose here that increased production of a natural PrP α-cleavage fragment, C1, is also associated with resistance to disease. We show, in brain tissue, that ARR homozygous sheep, associated with resistance to disease, produced PrP^C comprised of 25% more C1 fragment than PrP^C from the disease-susceptible ARQ homozygous and highly susceptible VRQ homozygous animals. Only the C1 fragment derived from the ARR allele inhibits in-vitro fibrillisation of other allelic PrP^C variants. We propose that the increased α-cleavage of ovine ARR PrP^C contributes to a dominant negative effect of this polymorphism on disease susceptibility. Furthermore, the significant reduction in PrP^C β-cleavage product C2 in sheep of the ARR/ARR genotype compared to ARQ/ARQ and VRQ/VRQ genotypes, may add to the complexity of genetic determinants of prion disease susceptibility.     

Taking advantage of physiological proteolytic processing of the prion protein for a therapeutic perspective in prion and Alzheimer diseases

Prion and Alzheimer diseases are fatal neurodegenerative diseases caused by misfolding and aggregation of the cellular prion protein (PrP^C) and the β-amyloid peptide, respectively. Soluble oligomeric species rather than large aggregates are now believed to be neurotoxic. PrP^C undergoes three proteolytic cleavages as part of its natural life cycle, α-cleavage, β-cleavage, and ectodomain shedding. Recent evidences demonstrate that the resulting secreted PrP^C molecules might represent natural inhibitors against soluble toxic species. In this mini-review, we summarize recent observations suggesting the potential benefit of using PrP^C-derived molecules as therapeutic agents in prion and Alzheimer diseases.     

α-Cleavage of cellular prion protein

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is subjected to various processing under physiological and pathological conditions, of which the α-cleavage within the central hydrophobic domain not only disrupts a region critical for both PrP toxicity and PrP^C to PrP^Sc conversion but also produces the N1 fragment that is neuroprotective and the C1 fragment that enhances the pro-apoptotic effect of staurosporine in one report and inhibits prion in another. The proteases responsible for the α-cleavage of PrP^C are controversial. The effect of ADAM10, ADAM17, and ADAM9 on N1 secretion clearly indicates their involvement in the α-cleavage of PrP^C, but there has been no report of direct PrP^C α-cleavage activity with any of the three ADAMs in a purified protein form. We demonstrated that, in muscle cells, ADAM8 is the primary protease for the α-cleavage of PrP^C, but another unidentified protease(s) must also play a minor role. We also found that PrP^C regulates ADAM8 expression, suggesting that a close examination on the relationships between PrP^C and its processing enzymes may reveal novel roles and underlying mechanisms for PrP^C in non-prion diseases such as asthma and cancer.     

Microdeletions within the hydrophobic core region of cellular prion protein alter its topology and metabolism

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is a GPI-anchored cell-surface protein. A small subset of PrP^C molecules, however, can be integrated into the ER-membrane via a transmembrane domain (TM), which also harbors the most highly conserved regions of PrP^C, termed the hydrophobic core (HC). A mutation in HC is associated with prion disease resulting in an enhanced formation of a transmembrane form (^CtmPrP), which has thus been postulated to be a neurotoxic molecule besides PrP^Sc. To elucidate a possible physiological function of the transmembrane domain, we created a set of mutants carrying microdeletions of 2-8 aminoacids within HC between position 114 and 121. Here, we show that these mutations display reduced propensity for transmembrane topology. In addition, the mutants exhibited alterations in the formation of the C1 proteolytic fragment, which is generated by α-cleavage during normal PrP^C metabolism, indicating that HC might function as recognition site for the protease(s) responsible for PrP^C α-cleavage. Interestingly, the mutant G113V, corresponding to a hereditary form of prion disease in humans, displayed increased ^CtmPrP topology and decreased α-cleavage in our in vitro assay. In conclusion, HC represents an essential determinant for transmembrane PrP topology, whereas the high evolutionary conservation of this region is rather based upon preservation of PrP^C α-cleavage, thus highlighting the biological importance of this cleavage.     

Role of ADAMs in the Ectodomain Shedding and Conformational Conversion of the Prion Protein

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is essential for the pathogenesis and transmission of prion diseases. PrP^C is bound to the plasma membrane via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor, although a secreted, soluble form has also been identified. Previously we reported that PrP^C is subject to ectodomain shedding from the membrane by zinc metalloproteinases with a similar inhibition profile to those involved in shedding the amyloid precursor protein. Here we have used gain-of-function (overexpression) and loss-of-function (small interfering RNA knockdown) experiments in cells to identify the ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloproteinases) involved in the ectodomain shedding of PrP^C. These experiments revealed that ADAM9 and ADAM10, but not ADAM17, are involved in the shedding of PrP^C and that ADAM9 exerts its effect on PrP^C shedding via ADAM10. Using dominant negative, catalytically inactive mutants, we show that the catalytic activity of ADAM9 is required for its effect on ADAM10. Mass spectrometric analysis revealed that ADAM10, but not ADAM9, cleaved PrP between Gly²²⁸ and Arg²²⁹, three residues away from the site of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor attachment. The shedding of another membrane protein, the amyloid precursor protein β-secretase BACE1, by ADAM9 is also mediated via ADAM10. Furthermore, we show that pharmacological inhibition of PrP^C shedding or activation of both PrP^C and PrP^Sc shedding by ADAM10 overexpression in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma N2a cells does not alter the formation of proteinase K-resistant PrP^Sc. Collectively, these data indicate that although PrP^C can be shed through the action of ADAM family members, modulation of PrP^C or PrP^Sc ectodomain shedding does not regulate prion conversion.The prion protein (PrP)³ is the causative agent of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans, scrapie in sheep, bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle, and chronic wasting disease in deer and elk (1). In these diseases the cellular form of PrP (PrP^C) undergoes a conformational conversion to the infectious form PrP^Sc that is characterized biochemically by its resistance to digestion with proteinase K (PK) (2). Mature PrP^C is anchored to the extracellular surface of the cell membrane through a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor and, like most GPI-anchored proteins, is clustered into cholesterol-rich, detergent-resistant membrane rafts (reviewed in Ref. 3). Although the precise subcellular site of conversion remains undefined, conformational conversion of PrP^C to PrP^Sc is believed to occur either at the cell surface or within the endocytic pathway (4–6).A number of studies indicate that modulation of PrP^C levels at the cell surface may represent a possible future disease intervention strategy. For example, the retention of PrP^C at the cell surface and concomitant prevention of its endocytosis through the use of PrP antibodies inhibited PrP^Sc formation (7). Furthermore, the sterol-binding polyene antibiotic filipin reduced endocytosis, and induced cellular release, of PrP^C with a concomitant reduction in PrP^Sc accumulation (8). More recently, it has been shown that modulation of cell surface PrP^C levels by the novel sorting nexin SNX33 can interfere with PrP^Sc formation in cultured cells (9). Nonetheless, the natural processes regulating PrP^C levels at the cell surface remain poorly defined. One such mechanism of regulation is via shedding of the bulk of the ectodomain of PrP^C either through cleavage of the polypeptide close to the GPI anchor or within the GPI anchor itself. Indeed, it has long been established that PrP^C can be shed into the medium of cultured cells and is present as a soluble form in vivo in human cerebrospinal fluid (10, 11).Numerous cell surface proteins can be proteolytically shed by the action of a group of zinc metalloproteinases known collectively as secretases or sheddases (reviewed in Refs. 12, 13). Whereas most proteolytically shed proteins are derived from transmembrane polypeptide-anchored substrates, several GPI-anchored proteins, including the folate receptor (14), the ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase ART2.2 (15), and a GPI-anchored construct of angiotensin-converting enzyme (16) are shed by the action of metalloproteinases. We have previously shown that PrP^C can also be proteolytically shed from the cell surface through the action of one or more zinc metalloproteinases with similar properties to those of the α-secretases responsible for the shedding of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) of Alzheimer disease (17). This α-secretase-mediated ectodomain shedding of APP from the cell surface is carried out by at least three members of the a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) family, namely ADAM9, -10, and -17 (reviewed in Ref. 18). In addition to cleavage by ADAMs, APP is also cleaved by the β-secretase, BACE1 (β-site APP-cleaving enzyme) and the γ-secretase complex to release the neurotoxic amyloid-β peptide (19). BACE1 itself is also subject to ectodomain shedding by as yet unidentified members of the ADAM family (20).The similarities between the ectodomain shedding of APP and PrP^C, in particular the similar profile of inhibition by a range of hydroxamate-based zinc metalloproteinase inhibitors (17), led us to investigate whether the same members of the ADAM family were also involved in the shedding of PrP^C. It should be noted that this ectodomain shedding of PrP^C by cleavage of the polypeptide chain near to the site (Ser²³¹) of GPI anchor addition in the C terminus of the protein is distinct from the so-called α-cleavage between residues 111 and 112 in the middle of the protein (21, 22). This latter “endoproteolytic” cleavage of PrP^C is reported to be carried out by members of the ADAM family (23, 24).To investigate the role of ADAMs in the ectodomain shedding of PrP^C, we used loss-of-function and gain-of-function experiments in cultured cells in which candidate PrP sheddases were either knocked down by siRNA or overexpressed. We have also further characterized the shedding of BACE1 by comparison to the shedding of APP and PrP^C. In addition, we have explored whether proteolytic shedding of PrP^C is of importance in regulating its conversion into PrP^Sc.     

The P’s and Q’s of cellular PrP-Aβ interactions

Prion disease research has opened up the “black-box” of neurodegeneration, defining a key role for protein misfolding wherein a predominantly alpha-helical precursor protein, PrP^C, is converted to a disease-associated, β-sheet enriched isoform called PrP^Sc. In Alzheimer disease (AD) the Aβ peptide derived from the β-amyloid precuror protein APP folds in β-sheet amyloid. Early thoughts along the lines of overlap may have been on target,¹ but were eclipsed by a simultaneous (but now anachronistic) controversy over the role of PrP^Sc in prion diseases.^2,3 Nonetheless, as prion diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) are themselves rare and can include an overt infectious mode of transmission, and as familial prion diseases and familial AD involve different genes, an observer might reasonably have concluded that prion research could occasionally catalyze ideas in AD, but could never provide concrete overlaps at the mechanistic level. Surprisingly, albeit a decade or three down the road, several prion/AD commonalities can be found within the contemporary literature. One important prion/AD overlap concerns seeded spread of Aβ aggregates by intracerebral inoculation much like prions,⁴ and, with a neuron-to-neuron ‘spreading’ also reported for pathologic forms of other misfolded proteins, Tau^5,6 and α-synuclein in the case of Parkinson Disease.^7,8 The concept of seeded spread has been discussed extensively elsewhere, sometimes under the rubric of “prionoids”⁹, and lies outside the scope of this particular review where we will focus upon PrP^C. From this point the story can now be subdivided into four strands of investigation: (1) pathologic effects of Aβ can be mediated by binding to PrP^C,¹⁰ (2) the positioning of endoproteolytic processing events of APP by pathologic (β-cleavage + γ-cleavage) and non-pathologic (α-cleavage + γ-cleavage) secretase pathways is paralleled by seemingly analogous α- and β-like cleavage of PrP^C (Fig. 1) (3) similar lipid raft environments for PrP^C and APP processing machinery,^11-13 and perhaps in consequence, overlaps in repertoire of the PrP^C and APP protein interactors (“interactomes”),^14,15 and (4) rare kindreds with mixed AD and prion pathologies.¹⁶ Here we discuss confounds, consensus and conflict associated with parameters that apply to these experimental settings.     

Prion Protein—Antibody Complexes Characterized by Chromatography-Coupled Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering

Aberrant self-assembly, induced by structural misfolding of the prion proteins, leads to a number of neurodegenerative disorders. In particular, misfolding of the mostly α-helical cellular prion protein (PrP^C) into a β-sheet-rich disease-causing isoform (PrP^Sc) is the key molecular event in the formation of PrP^Sc aggregates. The molecular mechanisms underlying the PrP^C-to-PrP^Sc conversion and subsequent aggregation remain to be elucidated. However, in persistently prion-infected cell-culture models, it was shown that treatment with monoclonal antibodies against defined regions of the prion protein (PrP) led to the clearing of PrP^Sc in cultured cells. To gain more insight into this process, we characterized PrP-antibody complexes in solution using a fast protein liquid chromatography coupled with small-angle x-ray scattering (FPLC-SAXS) procedure. High-quality SAXS data were collected for full-length recombinant mouse PrP [denoted recPrP(23–230)] and N-terminally truncated recPrP(89–230), as well as their complexes with each of two Fab fragments (HuM-P and HuM-R1), which recognize N- and C-terminal epitopes of PrP, respectively. In-line measurements by fast protein liquid chromatography coupled with SAXS minimized data artifacts caused by a non-monodispersed sample, allowing structural analysis of PrP alone and in complex with Fab antibodies. The resulting structural models suggest two mechanisms for how these Fabs may prevent the conversion of PrP^C into PrP^Sc.     

Interaction of Peptide Aptamers with Prion Protein Central Domain Promotes α-Cleavage of PrP<Superscript>C</Superscript>

Prion diseases are infectious and fatal neurodegenerative diseases affecting humans and animals. Transmission is possible within and between species with zoonotic potential. Currently, no prophylaxis or treatment exists. Prions are composed of the misfolded isoform PrP^Sc of the cellular prion protein PrP^C. Expression of PrP^C is a prerequisite for prion infection, and conformational conversion of PrP^C is induced upon its direct interaction with PrP^Sc. Inhibition of this interaction can abrogate prion propagation, and we have previously established peptide aptamers (PAs) binding to PrP^C as new anti-prion compounds. Here, we mapped the interaction site of PA8 in PrP and modeled the complex in silico to design targeted mutations in PA8 which presumably enhance binding properties. Using these PA8 variants, we could improve PA-mediated inhibition of PrP^Sc replication and de novo infection of neuronal cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that binding of PA8 and its variants increases PrP^C α-cleavage and interferes with its internalization. This gives rise to high levels of the membrane-anchored PrP-C1 fragment, a transdominant negative inhibitor of prion replication. PA8 and its variants interact with PrP^C at its central and most highly conserved domain, a region which is crucial for prion conversion and facilitates toxic signaling of Aβ oligomers characteristic for Alzheimer’s disease. Our strategy allows for the first time to induce α-cleavage, which occurs within this central domain, independent of targeting the responsible protease. Therefore, interaction of PAs with PrP^C and enhancement of α-cleavage represent mechanisms that can be beneficial for the treatment of prion and other neurodegenerative diseases.     

The P’s and Q’s of cellular PrP-Aβ interactions

Prion disease research has opened up the “black-box” of neurodegeneration, defining a key role for protein misfolding wherein a predominantly alpha-helical precursor protein, PrP^C, is converted to a disease-associated, β-sheet enriched isoform called PrP^Sc. In Alzheimer disease (AD) the Aβ peptide derived from the β-amyloid precuror protein APP folds in β-sheet amyloid. Early thoughts along the lines of overlap may have been on target,¹ but were eclipsed by a simultaneous (but now anachronistic) controversy over the role of PrP^Sc in prion diseases.^2,3 Nonetheless, as prion diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) are themselves rare and can include an overt infectious mode of transmission, and as familial prion diseases and familial AD involve different genes, an observer might reasonably have concluded that prion research could occasionally catalyze ideas in AD, but could never provide concrete overlaps at the mechanistic level. Surprisingly, albeit a decade or three down the road, several prion/AD commonalities can be found within the contemporary literature. One important prion/AD overlap concerns seeded spread of Aβ aggregates by intracerebral inoculation much like prions,⁴ and, with a neuron-to-neuron ‘spreading’ also reported for pathologic forms of other misfolded proteins, Tau^5,6 and α-synuclein in the case of Parkinson Disease.^7,8 The concept of seeded spread has been discussed extensively elsewhere, sometimes under the rubric of “prionoids”⁹, and lies outside the scope of this particular review where we will focus upon PrP^C. From this point the story can now be subdivided into four strands of investigation: (1) pathologic effects of Aβ can be mediated by binding to PrP^C,¹⁰ (2) the positioning of endoproteolytic processing events of APP by pathologic (β-cleavage + γ-cleavage) and non-pathologic (α-cleavage + γ-cleavage) secretase pathways is paralleled by seemingly analogous α- and β-like cleavage of PrP^C (Fig. 1) (3) similar lipid raft environments for PrP^C and APP processing machinery,^11-13 and perhaps in consequence, overlaps in repertoire of the PrP^C and APP protein interactors (“interactomes”),^14,15 and (4) rare kindreds with mixed AD and prion pathologies.¹⁶ Here we discuss confounds, consensus and conflict associated with parameters that apply to these experimental settings.     

Double-Edge Sword of Sustained ROCK Activation in Prion Diseases through Neuritogenesis Defects and Prion Accumulation

In prion diseases, synapse dysfunction, axon retraction and loss of neuronal polarity precede neuronal death. The mechanisms driving such polarization defects, however, remain unclear. Here, we examined the contribution of RhoA-associated coiled-coil containing kinases (ROCK), key players in neuritogenesis, to prion diseases. We found that overactivation of ROCK signaling occurred in neuronal stem cells infected by pathogenic prions (PrP^Sc) and impaired the sprouting of neurites. In reconstructed networks of mature neurons, PrP^Sc-induced ROCK overactivation provoked synapse disconnection and dendrite/axon degeneration. This overactivation of ROCK also disturbed overall neurotransmitter-associated functions. Importantly, we demonstrated that beyond its impact on neuronal polarity ROCK overactivity favored the production of PrP^Sc through a ROCK-dependent control of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) activity. In non-infectious conditions, ROCK and PDK1 associated within a complex and ROCK phosphorylated PDK1, conferring basal activity to PDK1. In prion-infected neurons, exacerbated ROCK activity increased the pool of PDK1 molecules physically interacting with and phosphorylated by ROCK. ROCK-induced PDK1 overstimulation then canceled the neuroprotective α-cleavage of normal cellular prion protein PrP^C by TACE α-secretase, which physiologically precludes PrP^Sc production. In prion-infected cells, inhibition of ROCK rescued neurite sprouting, preserved neuronal architecture, restored neuronal functions and reduced the amount of PrP^Sc. In mice challenged with prions, inhibition of ROCK also lowered brain PrP^Sc accumulation, reduced motor impairment and extended survival. We conclude that ROCK overactivation exerts a double detrimental effect in prion diseases by altering neuronal polarity and triggering PrP^Sc accumulation. Eventually ROCK emerges as therapeutic target to combat prion diseases.     

Glypican-1 Mediates Both Prion Protein Lipid Raft Association and Disease Isoform Formation

In prion diseases, the cellular form of the prion protein, PrP^C, undergoes a conformational conversion to the infectious isoform, PrP^Sc. PrP^C associates with lipid rafts through its glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor and a region in its N-terminal domain which also binds to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). We show that heparin displaces PrP^C from rafts and promotes its endocytosis, suggesting that heparin competes with an endogenous raft-resident HSPG for binding to PrP^C. We then utilised a transmembrane-anchored form of PrP (PrP-TM), which is targeted to rafts solely by its N-terminal domain, to show that both heparin and phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C can inhibit its association with detergent-resistant rafts, implying that a GPI-anchored HSPG targets PrP^C to rafts. Depletion of the major neuronal GPI-anchored HSPG, glypican-1, significantly reduced the raft association of PrP-TM and displaced PrP^C from rafts, promoting its endocytosis. Glypican-1 and PrP^C colocalised on the cell surface and both PrP^C and PrP^Sc co-immunoprecipitated with glypican-1. Critically, treatment of scrapie-infected N2a cells with glypican-1 siRNA significantly reduced PrP^Sc formation. In contrast, depletion of glypican-1 did not alter the inhibitory effect of PrP^C on the β-secretase cleavage of the Alzheimer''s amyloid precursor protein. These data indicate that glypican-1 is a novel cellular cofactor for prion conversion and we propose that it acts as a scaffold facilitating the interaction of PrP^C and PrP^Sc in lipid rafts.     

Role of Lipid Rafts and GM1 in the Segregation and Processing of Prion Protein

The prion protein (PrP^C) is highly expressed within the nervous system. Similar to other GPI-anchored proteins, PrP^C is found in lipid rafts, membrane domains enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids. PrP^C raft association, together with raft lipid composition, appears essential for the conversion of PrP^C into the scrapie isoform PrP^Sc, and the development of prion disease. Controversial findings were reported on the nature of PrP^C-containing rafts, as well as on the distribution of PrP^C between rafts and non-raft membranes. We investigated PrP^C/ganglioside relationships and their influence on PrP^C localization in a neuronal cellular model, cerebellar granule cells. Our findings argue that in these cells at least two PrP^C conformations coexist: in lipid rafts PrP^C is present in the native folding (α-helical), stabilized by chemico-physical condition, while it is mainly present in other membrane compartments in a PrP^Sc-like conformation. We verified, by means of antibody reactivity and circular dichroism spectroscopy, that changes in lipid raft-ganglioside content alters PrP^C conformation and interaction with lipid bilayers, without modifying PrP^C distribution or cleavage. Our data provide new insights into the cellular mechanism of prion conversion and suggest that GM1-prion protein interaction at the cell surface could play a significant role in the mechanism predisposing to pathology.     

Regulation of amyloid-β production by the prion protein

Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by the amyloidogenic processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP), culminating in the accumulation of amyloid-β peptides in the brain. The enzymatic action of the β-secretase, BACE1 is the rate-limiting step in this amyloidogenic processing of APP. BACE1 cleavage of wild-type APP (APP_WT) is inhibited by the cellular prion protein (PrP^C). Our recent study has revealed the molecular and cellular mechanisms behind this observation by showing that PrP^C directly interacts with the pro-domain of BACE1 in the trans-Golgi network (TGN), decreasing the amount of BACE1 at the cell surface and in endosomes where it cleaves APP_WT, while increasing BACE1 in the TGN where it preferentially cleaves APP with the Swedish mutation (APP_Swe). PrP^C deletion in transgenic mice expressing the Swedish and Indiana familial mutations (APP_Swe,Ind) failed to affect amyloid-β accumulation, which is explained by the differential subcellular sites of action of BACE1 toward APP_WT and APP_Swe. This, together with our observation that PrP^C is reduced in sporadic but not familial AD brain, suggests that PrP^C plays a key protective role against sporadic AD. It also highlights the need for an APP_WT transgenic mouse model to understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying sporadic AD.     

Prion protein and Alzheimer disease

Alzheimer and prion diseases are neurodegenerative disorders characterised by the abnormal processing of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide and prion protein (PrP^C), respectively. Recent evidence indicates that PrP^C may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. PrP^C interacts with and inhibits the β-secretase BACE1, the rate-limiting enzyme in the production of Aβ. More recently PrP^C was identified as a receptor for Aβ oligomers and the expression of PrP^C appears to be controlled by the amyloid intracellular domain (AICD). Here we review these observations and propose a feedback loop in the normal brain where PrP^C exerts an inhibitory effect on BACE1 to decrease both Aβ and AICD production. In turn, the AICD upregulates PrP^C expression, thus maintaining the inhibitory effect of PrP^C on BACE1. In Alzheimer disease, this feedback loop is disrupted, and the increased level of Aβ oligomers bind to PrP^C and prevent it from regulating BACE1 activity.Key words: alzheimer disease, amyloid-β, Aβ oligomers, amyloid intracellular domain, BACE1, presenilin, prion protein     

Disease-associated Mutations in the Prion Protein Impair Laminin-induced Process Outgrowth and Survival

Prions, the agents of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, require the expression of prion protein (PrP^C) to propagate disease. PrP^C is converted into an abnormal insoluble form, PrP^Sc, that gains neurotoxic activity. Conversely, clinical manifestations of prion disease may occur either before or in the absence of PrP^Sc deposits, but the loss of normal PrP^C function contribution for the etiology of these diseases is still debatable. Prion disease-associated mutations in PrP^C represent one of the best models to understand the impact of PrP^C loss-of-function. PrP^C associates with various molecules and, in particular, the interaction of PrP^C with laminin (Ln) modulates neuronal plasticity and memory formation. To assess the functional alterations associated with PrP^C mutations, wild-type and mutated PrP^C proteins were expressed in a neural cell line derived from a PrP^C-null mouse. Treatment with the laminin γ1 chain peptide (Ln γ1), which mimics the Ln binding site for PrP^C, increased intracellular calcium in cells expressing wild-type PrP^C, whereas a significantly lower response was observed in cells expressing mutated PrP^C molecules. The Ln γ1 did not promote process outgrowth or protect against staurosporine-induced cell death in cells expressing mutated PrP^C molecules in contrast to cells expressing wild-type PrP^C. The co-expression of wild-type PrP^C with mutated PrP^C molecules was able to rescue the Ln protective effects, indicating the lack of negative dominance of PrP^C mutated molecules. These results indicate that PrP^C mutations impair process outgrowth and survival mediated by Ln γ1 peptide in neural cells, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of genetic prion diseases.