Responses of Arabidopsis and Wheat to Rising CO2 Depend on Nitrogen Source and Nighttime CO2 Levels

A major contributor to the global carbon cycle is plant respiration. Elevated atmospheric CO₂ concentrations may either accelerate or decelerate plant respiration for reasons that have been uncertain. We recently established that elevated CO₂ during the daytime decreases plant mitochondrial respiration in the light and protein concentration because CO₂ slows the daytime conversion of nitrate (NO₃−) into protein. This derives in part from the inhibitory effect of CO₂ on photorespiration and the dependence of shoot NO₃− assimilation on photorespiration. Elevated CO₂ also inhibits the translocation of nitrite into the chloroplast, a response that influences shoot NO₃− assimilation during both day and night. Here, we exposed Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants to daytime or nighttime elevated CO₂ and supplied them with NO₃− or ammonium as a sole nitrogen (N) source. Six independent measures (plant biomass, shoot NO₃−, shoot organic N, ¹⁵N isotope fractionation, ¹⁵NO₃⁻ assimilation, and the ratio of shoot CO₂ evolution to O₂ consumption) indicated that elevated CO₂ at night slowed NO₃− assimilation and thus decreased dark respiration in the plants reliant on NO₃−. These results provide a straightforward explanation for the diverse responses of plants to elevated CO₂ at night and suggest that soil N source will have an increasing influence on the capacity of plants to mitigate human greenhouse gas emissions.The CO₂ concentration in Earth’s atmosphere has increased from about 270 to 400 µmol mol^–1 since 1800, and may double before the end of the century (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013). Plant responses to such increases are highly variable, but plant nitrogen (N) concentrations generally decline under elevated CO₂ (Cotrufo et al., 1998; Long et al., 2004). One explanation for this decline is that CO₂ inhibits nitrate (NO₃−) assimilation into protein in the shoots of C₃ plants during the daytime (Bloom et al., 2002, 2010, 2012, 2014; Cheng et al., 2012; Pleijel and Uddling, 2012; Myers et al., 2014; Easlon et al., 2015; Pleijel and Högy, 2015). This derives in part from the inhibitory effect of CO₂ on photorespiration (Foyer et al., 2009) and the dependence of shoot NO₃− assimilation on photorespiration (Rachmilevitch et al., 2004; Bloom, 2015).A key factor in global carbon budgets is plant respiration at night (Amthor, 1991; Farrar and Williams, 1991; Drake et al., 1999; Leakey et al., 2009). Nighttime elevated CO₂ may inhibit, have a negligible effect on, or stimulate dark respiration, depending on the plant species (Bunce, 2001, 2003; Wang and Curtis, 2002), plant development stage (Wang et al., 2001; Li et al., 2013), experimental approach (Griffin et al., 1999; Baker et al., 2000; Hamilton et al., 2001; Bruhn et al., 2002; Jahnke and Krewitt, 2002; Bunce, 2004), and total N supply (Markelz et al., 2014). The current study is, to our knowledge, the first to examine the influence of N source, NO₃− versus ammonium (NH₄+), on plant dark respiration at elevated CO₂ during the night.Plant organic N compounds account for less than 5% of the total dry weight of a plant, but conversion of NO₃− into organic N expends about 25% of the total energy in shoots (Bloom et al., 1989) and roots (Bloom et al., 1992). During the day, photorespiration supplies a portion of the energy (Rachmilevitch et al., 2004; Foyer et al., 2009), but at night, this energetic cost is borne entirely by the respiration of C substrates (Amthor, 1995) and may divert a substantial amount of reductant from the mitochondrial electron transport chain (Cousins and Bloom, 2004). The relative importance of NO₃− assimilation at night versus the day, however, is still a matter of intense debate (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2010). Here, we estimated NO₃− assimilation using several independent methods and show in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and wheat (Triticum aestivum), two diverse C₃ plants, that NO₃− assimilation at night can be substantial, and that elevated CO₂ at night inhibits this process.     

NdhV Is a Subunit of NADPH Dehydrogenase Essential for Cyclic Electron Transport in Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803

Two mutants sensitive to heat stress for growth and impaired in NADPH dehydrogenase (NDH-1)-dependent cyclic electron transport around photosystem I (NDH-CET) were isolated from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 transformed with a transposon-bearing library. Both mutants had a tag in the same sll0272 gene, encoding a protein highly homologous to NdhV identified in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Deletion of the sll0272 gene (ndhV) did not influence the assembly of NDH-1 complexes and the activities of CO₂ uptake and respiration but reduced the activity of NDH-CET. NdhV interacted with NdhS, a ferredoxin-binding subunit of cyanobacterial NDH-1 complex. Deletion of NdhS completely abolished NdhV, but deletion of NdhV had no effect on the amount of NdhS. Reduction of NDH-CET activity was more significant in ΔndhS than in ΔndhV. We therefore propose that NdhV cooperates with NdhS to accept electrons from reduced ferredoxin.Cyanobacterial NADPH dehydrogenase (NDH-1) complexes are localized in the thylakoid membrane (Ohkawa et al., 2001, 2002; Zhang et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2008; Battchikova et al., 2011b) and participate in a variety of bioenergetic reactions, such as respiration, cyclic electron transport around photosystem I (NDH-CET), and CO₂ uptake (Ogawa, 1991; Mi et al., 1992; Ohkawa et al., 2000). Structurally, the cyanobacterial NDH-1 complexes closely resemble energy-converting complex I in eubacteria and the mitochondrial respiratory chain regardless of the absence of homologs of three subunits in cyanobacterial genomes that constitute the catalytically active core of complex I (Friedrich et al., 1995; Friedrich and Scheide, 2000; Arteni et al., 2006). Over the past decade, new subunits of NDH-1 complexes specific to oxygenic photosynthesis have been identified in several cyanobacterial strains. They are NdhM to NdhQ and NdhS (Prommeenate et al., 2004; Battchikova et al., 2005, 2011b; Nowaczyk et al., 2011; Wulfhorst et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2014b, 2015), in addition to NdhL first identified in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 (hereafter Synechocystis 6803) about 20 years ago (Ogawa, 1992). Among them, NdhS possesses a ferredoxin (Fd)-binding motif and was shown to bind Fd, which suggested that Fd is one of the electron donors to NDH-1 complexes (Mi et al., 1995; Battchikova et al., 2011b; Ma and Ogawa, 2015). Deletion of NdhS strongly reduced the activity of NDH-CET but had no effect on respiration and CO₂ uptake (Battchikova et al., 2011b; Ma and Ogawa, 2015). The NDH-CET plays an important role in coping with various environmental stresses regardless of its elusive mechanism. For example, this function can greatly alleviate heat-sensitive growth phenotypes (Wang et al., 2006a; Zhao et al., 2014a). Thus, heat treatment strategy can help in identifying the proteins essential to NDH-CET.Here, a new oxygenic photosynthesis-specific (OPS) subunit NdhV was identified in Synechocystis 6803 with the help of heat treatment strategy, and its deletion did not influence the assembly of NDH-1L and NDH-1MS complexes and the activities of CO₂ uptake and respiration but impaired the NDH-CET activity. We give evidence that NdhV interacts with NdhS and is another component of Fd-binding domain of cyanobacterial NDH-1 complex. A possible role of NdhV on the NDH-CET activity is discussed.     

Production and Characterization of Synthetic Carboxysome Shells with Incorporated Luminal Proteins

Spatial segregation of metabolism, such as cellular-localized CO₂ fixation in C4 plants or in the cyanobacterial carboxysome, enhances the activity of inefficient enzymes by selectively concentrating them with their substrates. The carboxysome and other bacterial microcompartments (BMCs) have drawn particular attention for bioengineering of nanoreactors because they are self-assembling proteinaceous organelles. All BMCs share an architecturally similar, selectively permeable shell that encapsulates enzymes. Fundamental to engineering carboxysomes and other BMCs for applications in plant synthetic biology and metabolic engineering is understanding the structural determinants of cargo packaging and shell permeability. Here we describe the expression of a synthetic operon in Escherichia coli that produces carboxysome shells. Protein domains native to the carboxysome core were used to encapsulate foreign cargo into the synthetic shells. These synthetic shells can be purified to homogeneity with or without luminal proteins. Our results not only further the understanding of protein-protein interactions governing carboxysome assembly, but also establish a platform to study shell permeability and the structural basis of the function of intact BMC shells both in vivo and in vitro. This system will be especially useful for developing synthetic carboxysomes for plant engineering.A key enzyme in photosynthesis is the CO₂ fixation enzyme ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). Rubisco not only fixes CO₂, resulting in carbon assimilation, but it can also fix O₂, leading to photorespiration. Suppressing the unwanted oxygenase activity of Rubisco by sequestering Rubisco with a source of CO₂ is Nature’s solution to this substrate discrimination problem. While C4 plants compartmentalize CO₂ fixation in specific cells (Hibberd et al., 2008; Parry et al., 2011), cyanobacteria have evolved a specialized organelle composed entirely of protein to encapsulate Rubisco—the carboxysome.The carboxysome is just one type of bacterial microcompartment (BMC), widespread, functionally diverse bacterial organelles (Axen et al., 2014). All BMCs consist of an enzymatic core surrounded by a selectively permeable protein shell (Kerfeld et al., 2005; Tanaka et al., 2008; Chowdhury et al., 2014; Kerfeld and Erbilgin, 2015). While the encapsulated enzymes differ among functionally distinct BMCs, they share an architecturally similar shell composed of three types of proteins: BMC-H, BMC-T, and BMC-P forming hexamers, pseudohexamers, and pentamers, respectively (Kerfeld and Erbilgin, 2015). These constitute the building blocks of a self-assembling, apparently icosahedral shell with a diameter ranging from 40 to 400 nm (Shively et al., 1973a,b, 1998; Price and Badger, 1991; Bobik et al., 1999; Iancu et al., 2007, 2010; Petit et al., 2013; Erbilgin et al., 2014). Recent studies have also shown that in the biogenesis of BMCs an encapsulation peptide (EP) (Fan and Bobik, 2011; Kinney et al., 2012; Aussignargues et al., 2015; Jakobson et al., 2015), a short (approximately 18 residues) amphipathic α-helix mediates interactions between a subset of core protein and the shell (Fan and Bobik, 2011; Choudhary et al., 2012; Kinney et al., 2012; Lawrence et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2014; Aussignargues et al., 2015). Indeed, because they are self-assembling organelles composed entirely of protein, BMCs hold great promise for diverse applications in bioengineering and development of bionanomaterials (Frank et al., 2013; Chowdhury et al., 2014; Chessher et al., 2015; Kerfeld and Erbilgin, 2015); the key features of BMCs include selective permeability, spatial colocalization of enzymes, the establishment of private cofactor pools, and the potentially beneficial effects of confinement on protein stability. For example, introducing carboxysomes into plants could provide a saltational enhancement of crop photosynthesis (Price et al., 2013; Zarzycki et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2014; McGrath and Long, 2014).The β-carboxysome, which sequesters form 1B Rubisco, has been an important model system for the study of the structural basis of carboxysome function, assembly, and engineering (Kerfeld et al., 2005; Tanaka et al., 2008; Cameron et al., 2013; Aussignargues et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2015). Beta-carboxysomes assemble from the inside out (Cameron et al., 2013; Gonzalez-Esquer et al., 2015). Two proteins that are absolutely conserved and unique to β-carboxysomes, CcmM and CcmN, play essential roles in this process: CcmM crosslinks Rubisco through its C-terminal Rubisco small subunit-like domains (SSLDs; pfam00101); CcmM and CcmN interact through their N-terminal domains; and C-terminal EP of CcmN interacts with the carboxysome shell.Here we describe a system for producing synthetic β-carboxysome shells and encapsulating nonnative cargo. We constructed a synthetic operon composed of ccmK1, ccmK2, ccmL, and ccmO, genes encoding, respectively, two BMC-H proteins, a BMC-P protein, and a BMC-T protein of the carboxysome shell of the halotolerant cyanobacterium, Halothece sp. PCC 7418 (Halo hereafter). Recombinant shells composed of all four proteins were produced and purified. We also demonstrated that the terminal α-helices of CcmK1 and CcmK2 are not, as had been proposed (Samborska and Kimber, 2012), required for the shell formation, and that the synthetic shell is a single-layered protein membrane. Cargo could be targeted to the interior of the synthetic shells using either the EP of CcmN or the N-terminal domain of CcmM; the latter observation provides new insight into the organization of the β-carboxysome. Our results not only further the understanding of protein-protein interactions governing carboxysome assembly but also provide a platform to study carboxysome shell permeability. These results will be useful in guiding the design and optimization of carboxysomes and other BMCs for introduction into plants.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Stomatal Blue Light Response Is Present in Early Vascular Plants

Light is a major environmental factor required for stomatal opening. Blue light (BL) induces stomatal opening in higher plants as a signal under the photosynthetic active radiation. The stomatal BL response is not present in the fern species of Polypodiopsida. The acquisition of a stomatal BL response might provide competitive advantages in both the uptake of CO₂ and prevention of water loss with the ability to rapidly open and close stomata. We surveyed the stomatal opening in response to strong red light (RL) and weak BL under the RL with gas exchange technique in a diverse selection of plant species from euphyllophytes, including spermatophytes and monilophytes, to lycophytes. We showed the presence of RL-induced stomatal opening in most of these species and found that the BL responses operated in all euphyllophytes except Polypodiopsida. We also confirmed that the stomatal opening in lycophytes, the early vascular plants, is driven by plasma membrane proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase and K⁺ accumulation in guard cells, which is the same mechanism operating in stomata of angiosperms. These results suggest that the early vascular plants respond to both RL and BL and actively regulate stomatal aperture. We also found three plant species that absolutely require BL for both stomatal opening and photosynthetic CO₂ fixation, including a gymnosperm, C. revoluta, and the ferns Equisetum hyemale and Psilotum nudum.Stomata regulate gas exchange between plants and the atmosphere (Zeiger, 1983; Assmann, 1993; Roelfsema and Hedrich, 2005; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010). Acquisition of stomata was a key step in the evolution of terrestrial plants by allowing uptake of CO₂ from the atmosphere and accelerating the provision of nutrients via the transpiration stream within the plant (Hetherington and Woodward, 2003; McAdam and Brodribb, 2013). Stomatal aperture is regulated by changes in the turgor of guard cells, which are induced by environmental factors and endogenous phytohormones. Light is a major factor in the promotion of stomatal opening, and the opening is mediated via two distinct light-regulated pathways that are known as photosynthesis- and blue light (BL)-dependent responses under photosynthetic active radiation (PAR; Vavasseur and Raghavendra, 2005; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Lawson et al., 2014).The photosynthesis-dependent stomatal opening is induced by a continuous high intensity of light, and the action spectrum for the stomatal opening resembles that of photosynthetic pigments in leaves (Willmer and Fricker, 1996). Both mesophyll and guard cells possess photosynthetically active chloroplasts, and their photosynthesis has been suggested to contribute to stomatal opening in leaves. The decrease in the concentration of intercellular CO₂ (Ci) caused by photosynthetic CO₂ fixation or some unidentified mediators and metabolites from mesophyll cells is supposed to elicit stomatal opening, although the exact nature of the events is unclear (Wong et al., 1979; Vavasseur and Raghavendra, 2005; Roelfsema et al., 2006; Mott et al., 2008; Lawson et al., 2014).BL-dependent stomatal opening requires a strong intensity of PAR as a background: weak BL solely scarcely elicits stomatal opening, but the same intensity of BL induces the fast and large stomatal opening in the presence of strong red light (RL; Ogawa et al., 1978; Shimazaki et al., 2007). Since such stomatal opening requires BL under the RL or PAR, we call the opening reaction a BL-dependent response of stomata. BL-dependent stomatal response takes place and proceeds in natural environments because the sunlight contains both BL and RL and facilitates photosynthetic CO₂ fixation (Assmann, 1988; Takemiya et al., 2013a). In this stomatal response, BL and PAR (BL, RL, and other wavelengths of light) seem to act as a signal and an energy source, respectively.The BL-dependent stomatal opening is initiated by the absorption of BL by phototropin1 and phototropin2 (Kinoshita et al., 2001), the plant-specific BL receptors, in guard cells followed by activation of the plasma membrane proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase (H+-ATPase; Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999). Two newly identified proteins, protein phosphatase1 and blue light signaling1 (BLUS1), mediate the signaling between phototropins and H+-ATPase (Takemiya et al., 2006, 2013a, 2013b). The activated H+-ATPase evokes a plasma membrane hyperpolarization, which drives K⁺ uptake through the voltage-gated, inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann, 1993; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2010; Kollist et al., 2014). The accumulation of K⁺ causes water uptake and increases turgor pressure of guard cells, and finally results in stomatal opening. The BL-dependent opening is enhanced by RL, and BL at low intensity is effective in the presence of RL (Ogawa et al., 1978; Iino et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Suetsugu et al., 2014). These stomatal responses by RL and BL are commonly observed in a number of seed plants so far examined.Fine control of stomatal aperture to various environmental factors has been characterized in many angiosperms. Although morphological and mechanical diversity of stomata is widely documented, little is known about the functional diversity (Willmer and Fricker, 1996; Hetherington and Woodward, 2003). Our previous study indicated that BL-dependent stomatal response is absent in the major fern species of Polypodiopsida, including Adiantum capillus-veneris, Pteris cretica, Asplenium scolopendrium, and Nephrolepis auriculata, but the stomata of these species open by PAR including RL (Doi et al., 2006). When the epidermal peels isolated from A. capillus-veneris are treated with photosynthetic electron transport inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1dimethylurea (Doi and Shimazaki, 2008), the response is completely inhibited, but the responses in the seed plants of Vicia faba and Commelina communis are relatively insensitive to 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1dimethylurea (Schwartz and Zeiger, 1984). These findings suggest that there is functional diversity in light-dependent stomatal response in different lineages of land plants. In accord with this notion, the different sensitivities of stomatal response to abscisic acid and CO₂ have been reported among the plant species of angiosperm, gymnosperm, ferns, and lycophytes (Mansfield and Willmer, 1969; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011), although the exact responsiveness to abscisic acid and CO₂ is still debated (Chater et al., 2011, 2013; Ruszala et al., 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 2013).To address the origin and distribution of stomatal light responses, we investigated the presence of a stomatal response using a gas exchange method and various lineages of vascular plants, including euphyllophytes and lycophytes. Unexpectedly, all plant lineages except Polypodiopsida in monilophytes exhibited a stomatal response to BL in the presence of RL, suggesting that the response was present in the early evolutionary stage of vascular plants. We also report the stomatal opening in response to RL in these plant species.     

Focus Issue on Calcium Signaling: Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase CPK6 Positively Functions in Induction by Yeast Elicitor of Stomatal Closure and Inhibition by Yeast Elicitor of Light-Induced Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis

Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure that is mediated by a Ca²⁺-dependent signaling pathway. A Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinase, CPK6, positively regulates activation of ion channels in abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate signaling, leading to stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). YEL also inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. However, it remains unknown whether CPK6 is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure or in inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. In this study, we investigated the roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Disruption of CPK6 gene impaired induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. Activation by YEL of nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation channels was impaired in cpk6-2 guard cells, and transient elevations elicited by YEL in cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ concentration were suppressed in cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 guard cells. YEL activated slow anion channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1 and inhibited inward-rectifying K⁺ channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1. The cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 mutations inhibited YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide accumulation in guard cells and apoplast of rosette leaves but did not affect YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide production in the apoplast of rosette leaves. These results suggest that CPK6 positively functions in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis and is a convergent point of signaling pathways for stomatal closure in response to abiotic and biotic stress.Stomata, formed by pairs of guard cells, play a critical role in regulation of plant CO₂ uptake and water loss, thus critically influencing plant growth and water stress responsiveness. Guard cells respond to a variety of abiotic and biotic stimuli, such as light, drought, and pathogen attack (Israelsson et al., 2006; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Melotto et al., 2008).Elicitors derived from microbial surface mimic pathogen attack and induce stomatal closure in various plant species such as Solanum lycopersicum (Lee et al., 1999), Commelina communis (Lee et al., 1999), Hordeum vulgare (Koers et al., 2011), and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Melotto et al., 2006; Khokon et al., 2010). Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010; Salam et al., 2013). Our recent studies showed that YEL inhibits light-induced stomatal opening and that protein phosphorylation is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening (Salam et al., 2013).Cytosolic Ca²⁺ has long been recognized as a conserved second messenger in stomatal movement (Shimazaki et al., 2007; Roelfsema and Hedrich 2010; Hubbard et al., 2012). Elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca2+]_cyt) is triggered by influx of Ca²⁺ from apoplast and release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores in guard cell signaling (Leckie et al., 1998; Hamilton et al., 2000; Pei et al., 2000; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003; Lemtiri-Chlieh et al., 2003). The influx of Ca²⁺ is carried by nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation (I_Ca) channels that are activated by plasma membrane hyperpolarization and H₂O₂ (Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003). Elevation of [Ca2+]_cyt activates slow anion (S-type) channels and down-regulates inward-rectifying potassium (K_in) channels in guard cells (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Grabov and Blatt, 1999). The activation of S-type channels is a hallmark of stomatal closure, and the suppression of K_in channels is favorable to stomatal closure but not to stomatal opening (Pei et al., 1997; Kwak et al., 2001; Xue et al., 2011; Uraji et al., 2012).YEL induces stomatal closure with extracellular H₂O₂ production, intracellular H₂O₂ accumulation, activation of I_Ca channels, and transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010). However, it remains to be clarified whether YEL activates S-type channels and inhibits K_in channels in guard cells.Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are regulators in Ca²⁺-dependent guard cell signaling (Mori et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2007; Geiger et al., 2010, 2011; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011; Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). In guard cells, CDPKs regulate activation of S-type and I_Ca channels and inhibition of K_in channels (Mori et al., 2006; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011). A CDPK, CPK6, positively regulates activation of S-type channels and I_Ca channels without affecting H₂O₂ production in abscisic acid (ABA)- and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-induced stomatal closure (Mori et al., 2006; Munemasa et al., 2011). CPK6 phosphorylates and activates SLOW ANION CHANNEL-ASSOCIATED1 expressed in Xenopus spp. oocyte (Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). These findings underline the role of CPK6 in regulation of ion channel activation and stomatal movement, leading us to test whether CPK6 regulates the induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening.In this study, we investigated activation of S-type channels and inhibition of K_in channels by YEL and roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. For this purpose, we examined the effects of mutation of CPK6 on induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening, activation of I_Ca channels, transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations, activation of S-type channels, inhibition of K_in channels, H₂O₂ production in leaves, and H₂O₂ accumulation in leaves and guard cells.     

Mitochondrial Alternative Oxidase Maintains Respiration and Preserves Photosynthetic Capacity during Moderate Drought in Nicotiana tabacum

The mitochondrial electron transport chain includes an alternative oxidase (AOX) that is hypothesized to aid photosynthetic metabolism, perhaps by acting as an additional electron sink for photogenerated reductant or by dampening the generation of reactive oxygen species. Gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, photosystem I (PSI) absorbance, and biochemical and protein analyses were used to compare respiration and photosynthesis of Nicotiana tabacum ‘Petit Havana SR1’ wild-type plants with that of transgenic AOX knockdown (RNA interference) and overexpression lines, under both well-watered and moderate drought-stressed conditions. During drought, AOX knockdown lines displayed a lower rate of respiration in the light than the wild type, as confirmed by two independent methods. Furthermore, CO₂ and light response curves indicated a nonstomatal limitation of photosynthesis in the knockdowns during drought, relative to the wild type. Also relative to the wild type, the knockdowns under drought maintained PSI and PSII in a more reduced redox state, showed greater regulated nonphotochemical energy quenching by PSII, and displayed a higher relative rate of cyclic electron transport around PSI. The origin of these differences may lie in the chloroplast ATP synthase amount, which declined dramatically in the knockdowns in response to drought. None of these effects were seen in plants overexpressing AOX. The results show that AOX is necessary to maintain mitochondrial respiration during moderate drought. In its absence, respiration rate slows and the lack of this electron sink feeds back on the photosynthetic apparatus, resulting in a loss of chloroplast ATP synthase that then limits photosynthetic capacity.The plant mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) is bifurcated such that electrons in the ubiquinone pool partition between the cytochrome (cyt) pathway (consisting of Complex III, cyt c, and Complex IV) and alternative oxidase (AOX; Finnegan et al., 2004; Millar et al., 2011; Vanlerberghe, 2013). AOX directly couples ubiquinol oxidation with O₂ reduction to water. This reduces the energy yield of respiration because, unlike Complexes III and IV, AOX is not proton pumping. Hence, AOX is an electron sink, the capacity of which is little encumbered by rates of ATP turnover. In this way, AOX might be well suited to prevent cellular over-reduction. Supporting this, transgenic Nicotiana tabacum leaves with suppressed amounts of AOX have increased concentrations of mitochondrial-localized superoxide radical (O₂−) and nitric oxide, the products that can arise when an over-reduced ETC results in electron leakage to O₂ or nitrite (Cvetkovska and Vanlerberghe, 2012, 2013).In angiosperms, AOX is encoded by a small gene family (Considine et al., 2002). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation or knockdown of the stress-responsive AOX1a gene family member dramatically reduces AOX protein and the capacity of the AOX respiration pathway to consume O₂. Several studies have shown that this loss of AOX capacity in Arabidopsis aox1a plants affected processes such as growth, carbon and energy metabolism, and/or the cellular network of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers (Fiorani et al., 2005; Umbach et al., 2005; Watanabe et al., 2008; Giraud et al., 2008; Skirycz et al., 2010). However, in studies in which respiration was measured, it was consistently reported that the lack of AOX capacity had no significant impact on the respiration rate in the dark (R_D; Umbach et al., 2005; Giraud et al., 2008; Strodtkötter et al., 2009; Florez-Sarasa et al., 2011; Yoshida et al., 2011b; Gandin et al., 2012). The exceptions are two reports that R_D was actually higher in aox1a than in the wild type under some conditions (Watanabe et al., 2008; Vishwakarma et al., 2014). To our knowledge, how the lack of AOX affects respiration rate in the light (R_L) is not reported in Arabidopsis or other species.Numerous studies have established the importance of mitochondrial metabolism in the light to optimize photosynthesis (Hoefnagel et al., 1998; Raghavendra and Padmasree, 2003). In recent years, the potential importance of specifically AOX respiration during photosynthesis has been examined using the Arabidopsis aox1a plants (Giraud et al., 2008; Strodtkötter et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010; Florez-Sarasa et al., 2011; Yoshida et al., 2011a, 2011b). In general, these studies reported small perturbations of photosynthesis in standard-grown aox1a plants, including slightly lower rates of CO₂ uptake or O₂ release (Gandin et al., 2012; Vishwakarma et al., 2014), slightly higher rates of cyclic electron transport (CET; Yoshida et al., 2011b), and slightly increased susceptibility to photoinhibition after a high light treatment (Florez-Sarasa et al., 2011). Generally, these studies concluded that aox1a plants exhibit a biochemical limitation of photosynthesis, in line with the hypothesis that AOX serves as a sink for excess photogenerated reducing power, with the reductant likely reaching the mitochondrion via the malate valve (Noguchi and Yoshida, 2008; Taniguchi and Miyake, 2012). Similar to these Arabidopsis studies, we recently reported that well-watered N. tabacum AOX knockdowns grown at moderate irradiance display a slight reduced rate of photosynthesis (approximately 10%–15%) when measured at high irradiance. However, we established that the lower photosynthetic rate was the result of a stomatal rather than biochemical limitation of photosynthesis, and provided evidence that this stomatal limitation resulted from disrupted nitric oxide homeostasis within the guard cells of AOX knockdown plants (Cvetkovska et al., 2014).Drought is a common abiotic stress that can substantially curtail photosynthesis because stomatal closure, meant to conserve water, also restricts CO₂ availability to the Calvin cycle. Besides this well established stomatal limitation of photosynthesis, there may also be water deficit-sensitive biochemical components that contribute to the reduction of photosynthesis during drought. However, the nature of this biochemical limitation and the degree to which it contributes to the curtailment of photosynthesis during drought remain areas of active debate (Flexas et al., 2004; Lawlor and Tezara, 2009; Pinheiro and Chaves, 2011). Additional factors, such as patchy stomatal closure (Sharkey and Seemann, 1989; Gunasekera and Berkowitz, 1992) or changes in the conductance to CO₂ of mesophyll cells (Perez-Martin et al., 2009), can further complicate analyses of photosynthesis during drought.Metabolism can experience energy imbalances, when there is a mismatch between rates of synthesis and rates of utilization of ATP and/or NADPH, and the importance of mechanisms to minimize such imbalances has been emphasized (Cruz et al., 2005; Kramer and Evans, 2011; Vanlerberghe, 2013). For example, such imbalances may occur in the chloroplast when the use of ATP and NADPH by the Calvin cycle does not keep pace with the harvesting of light energy (Hüner et al., 2012). This can result in excess excitation energy that can damage photosynthetic components, perhaps through the generation of ROS (Asada, 2006; Noctor et al., 2014). Such a scenario has been hypothesized to underlie the development of the biochemical limitations of photosynthesis reported during drought (Lawlor and Tezara, 2009).In this study, we find that N. tabacum AOX knockdowns show a compromised rate of mitochondrial respiration in the light during moderate drought. This corresponds with a strong nonstomatal limitation of photosynthesis in these plants relative to the wild type, and we describe a biochemical basis for this photosynthetic limitation. The results indicate that AOX is a necessary electron sink to support photosynthesis during drought, a condition when the major photosynthetic electron sink, the Calvin cycle, is becoming limited by CO₂ availability.     

The Role of a Potassium Transporter OsHAK5 in Potassium Acquisition and Transport from Roots to Shoots in Rice at Low Potassium Supply Levels

In plants, K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) is the largest potassium (K) transporter family; however, few of the members have had their physiological functions characterized in planta. Here, we studied OsHAK5 of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice (Oryza sativa). We determined its cellular and tissue localization and analyzed its functions in rice using both OsHAK5 knockout mutants and overexpression lines in three genetic backgrounds. A β-glucuronidase reporter driven by the OsHAK5 native promoter indicated OsHAK5 expression in various tissue organs from root to seed, abundantly in root epidermis and stele, the vascular tissues, and mesophyll cells. Net K influx rate in roots and K transport from roots to aerial parts were severely impaired by OsHAK5 knockout but increased by OsHAK5 overexpression in 0.1 and 0.3 mm K external solution. The contribution of OsHAK5 to K mobilization within the rice plant was confirmed further by the change of K concentration in the xylem sap and K distribution in the transgenic lines when K was removed completely from the external solution. Overexpression of OsHAK5 increased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots and salt stress tolerance (shoot growth), while knockout of OsHAK5 decreased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots, resulting in sensitivity to salt stress. Taken together, these results demonstrate that OsHAK5 plays a major role in K acquisition by roots faced with low external K and in K upward transport from roots to shoots in K-deficient rice plants.Potassium (K) is one of the three most important macronutrients and the most abundant cation in plants. As a major osmoticum in the vacuole, K drives the generation of turgor pressure, enabling cell expansion. In the vascular tissue, K is an important participant in the generation of root pressure (for review, see Wegner, 2014 [including his new hypothesis]). In the phloem, K is critical for the transport of photoassimilates from source to sink (Marschner, 1996; Deeken et al., 2002; Gajdanowicz et al., 2011). In addition, enhancing K absorption and decreasing sodium (Na) accumulation is a major strategy of glycophytes in salt stress tolerance (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999; Munns and Tester, 2008; Shabala and Cuin, 2008).Plants acquire K through K-permeable proteins at the root surface. Since available K concentration in the soil may vary by 100-fold, plants have developed multiple K uptake systems for adapting to this variability (Epstein et al., 1963; Grabov, 2007; Maathuis, 2009). In a classic K uptake experiment in barley (Hordeum vulgare), root K absorption has been described as a high-affinity and low-affinity biphasic transport process (Epstein et al., 1963). It is generally assumed that the low-affinity transport system (LATS) in the roots mediates K uptake in the millimolar range and that the activity of this system is insensitive to external K concentration (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997; Chérel et al., 2014). In contrast, the high-affinity transport system (HATS) was rapidly up-regulated when the supply of exogenous K was halted (Glass, 1976; Glass and Dunlop, 1978).The membrane transporters for K flux identified in plants are generally classified into three channels and three transporter families based on phylogenetic analysis (Mäser et al., 2001; Véry and Sentenac, 2003; Lebaudy et al., 2007; Alemán et al., 2011). For K uptake, it was predicted that, under most circumstances, K transporters function as HATS, while K-permeable channels mediate LATS (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997). However, a root-expressed K channel in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), Arabidopsis K Transporter1 (AKT1), mediates K absorption over a wide range of external K concentrations (Sentenac et al., 1992; Lagarde et al., 1996; Hirsch et al., 1998; Spalding et al., 1999), while evidence is accumulating that many K transporters, including members of the K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) family, are low-affinity K transporters (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Senn et al., 2001), implying that functions of plant K channels and transporters overlap at different K concentration ranges.Out of the three families of K transporters, cation proton antiporter (CPA), high affinity K/Na transporter (HKT), and KT/HAK/KUP, CPA was characterized as a K⁺(Na⁺)/H⁺ antiporter, HKT may cotransport Na and K or transport Na only (Rubio et al., 1995; Uozumi et al., 2000), while KT/HAK/KUP were predicted to be H⁺-coupled K⁺ symporters (Mäser et al., 2001; Lebaudy et al., 2007). KT/HAK/KUP were named by different researchers who first identified and cloned them (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Santa-María et al., 1997). In plants, the KT/HAK/KUP family is the largest K transporter family, including 13 members in Arabidopsis and 27 members in the rice (Oryza sativa) genome (Rubio et al., 2000; Mäser et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2008). Sequence alignments show that genes of this family share relatively low homology to each other. The KT/HAK/KUP family was divided into four major clusters (Rubio et al., 2000; Gupta et al., 2008), and in cluster I and II, they were further separated into A and B groups. Genes of cluster I or II likely exist in all plants, cluster III is composed of genes from both Arabidopsis and rice, while cluster IV includes only four rice genes (Grabov, 2007; Gupta et al., 2008).The functions of KT/HAK/KUP were studied mostly in heterologous expression systems. Transporters of cluster I, such as AtHAK5, HvHAK1, OsHAK1, and OsHAK5, are localized in the plasma membrane (Kim et al., 1998; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gierth et al., 2005) and exhibit high-affinity K uptake in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Santa-María et al., 1997; Fu and Luan, 1998; Rubio et al., 2000) and in Escherichia coli (Horie et al., 2011). Transporters of cluster II, like AtKUP4 (TINY ROOT HAIRS1, TRH1), HvHAK2, OsHAK2, OsHAK7, and OsHAK10, could not complement the K uptake-deficient yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but were able to mediate K fluxes in a bacterial mutant; they might be tonoplast transporters (Senn et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Navarro and Rubio, 2006). The function of transporters in clusters III and IV is even less known (Grabov, 2007).Existing data suggest that some KT/HAK/KUP transporters also may respond to salinity stress (Maathuis, 2009). The cluster I transporters of HvHAK1 mediate Na influx (Santa-María et al., 1997), while AtHAK5 expression is inhibited by Na (Rubio et al., 2000; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010). Expression of OsHAK5 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY2 cells enhanced the salt tolerance of these cells by accumulating more K without affecting their Na content (Horie et al., 2011).There are only scarce reports on the physiological function of KT/HAK/KUP in planta. In Arabidopsis, mutation of AtKUP2 (SHORT HYPOCOTYL3) resulted in a short hypocotyl, small leaves, and a short flowering stem (Elumalai et al., 2002), while a loss-of-function mutation of AtKUP4 (TRH1) resulted in short root hairs and a loss of gravity response in the root (Rigas et al., 2001; Desbrosses et al., 2003; Ahn et al., 2004). AtHAK5 is the only system currently known to mediate K uptake at concentrations below 0.01 mm (Rubio et al., 2010) and provides a cesium uptake pathway (Qi et al., 2008). AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 are the two major physiologically relevant molecular entities mediating K uptake into roots in the range between 0.01 and 0.05 mm (Pyo et al., 2010; Rubio et al., 2010). AtAKT1 may contribute to K uptake within the K concentrations that belong to the high-affinity system described by Epstein et al. (1963).Among all 27 members of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice, OsHAK1, OsHAK5, OsHAK19, and OsHAK20 were grouped in cluster IB (Gupta et al., 2008). These four rice HAK members share 50.9% to 53.4% amino acid identity with AtHAK5. OsHAK1 was expressed in the whole plant, with maximum expression in roots, and was up-regulated by K deficiency; it mediated high-affinity K uptake in yeast (Bañuelos et al., 2002). In this study, we examined the tissue-specific localization and the physiological functions of OsHAK5 in response to variation in K supply and to salt stress in rice. By comparing K uptake and translocation in OsHAK5 knockout (KO) mutants and in OsHAK5-overexpressing lines with those in their respective wild-type lines supplied with different K concentrations, we found that OsHAK5 not only mediates high-affinity K acquisition but also participates in root-to-shoot K transport as well as in K-regulated salt tolerance.