The RSC chromatin remodelling enzyme has a unique role in directing the accurate positioning of nucleosomes

Nucleosomes impede access to DNA. Therefore, nucleosome positioning is fundamental to genome regulation. Nevertheless, the molecular nucleosome positioning mechanisms are poorly understood. This is partly because in vitro reconstitution of in vivo-like nucleosome positions from purified components is mostly lacking, barring biochemical studies. Using a yeast extract in vitro reconstitution system that generates in vivo-like nucleosome patterns at S. cerevisiae loci, we find that the RSC chromatin remodelling enzyme is necessary for nucleosome positioning. This was previously suggested by genome-wide in vivo studies and is confirmed here in vivo for individual loci. Beyond the limitations of conditional mutants, we show biochemically that RSC functions directly, can be sufficient, but mostly relies on other factors to properly position nucleosomes. Strikingly, RSC could not be replaced by either the closely related SWI/SNF or the Isw2 remodelling enzyme. Thus, we pinpoint that nucleosome positioning specifically depends on the unique properties of the RSC complex.     

Are nucleosome positions in vivo primarily determined by histone–DNA sequence preferences?

Large-scale and genome-wide studies have concluded that ∼80% of the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) genome is occupied by positioned nucleosomes. In vivo this nucleosome organization can result from a variety of mechanisms, including the intrinsic DNA sequence preferences for wrapping the DNA around the histone core. Recently, a genome-wide study was reported using massively parallel sequencing to directly compare in vivo and in vitro nucleosome positions. It was concluded that intrinsic DNA sequence preferences indeed have a dominant role in determining the in vivo nucleosome organization of the genome, consistent with a genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Some other studies disagree with this view. Using the large amount of data now available from several sources, we have attempted to clarify a fundamental question concerning the packaging of genomic DNA: to what extent are nucleosome positions in vivo determined by histone-DNA sequence preferences? We have analyzed data obtained from different laboratories in the same way, and have directly compared these data. We also identify possible problems with some of the experimental designs used and with the data analysis. Our findings suggest that DNA sequence preferences have only small effects on the positioning of individual nucleosomes throughout the genome in vivo.     

Multiple Aspects of ATP-Dependent Nucleosome Translocation by RSC and Mi-2 Are Directed by the Underlying DNA Sequence

Background

Chromosome structure, DNA metabolic processes and cell type identity can all be affected by changing the positions of nucleosomes along chromosomal DNA, a reaction that is catalysed by SNF2-type ATP-driven chromatin remodelers. Recently it was suggested that in vivo, more than 50% of the nucleosome positions can be predicted simply by DNA sequence, especially within promoter regions. This seemingly contrasts with remodeler induced nucleosome mobility. The ability of remodeling enzymes to mobilise nucleosomes over short DNA distances is well documented. However, the nucleosome translocation processivity along DNA remains elusive. Furthermore, it is unknown what determines the initial direction of movement and how new nucleosome positions are adopted.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have used AFM imaging and high resolution PAGE of mononucleosomes on 600 and 2500 bp DNA molecules to analyze ATP-dependent nucleosome repositioning by native and recombinant SNF2-type enzymes. We report that the underlying DNA sequence can control the initial direction of translocation, translocation distance, as well as the new positions adopted by nucleosomes upon enzymatic mobilization. Within a strong nucleosomal positioning sequence both recombinant Drosophila Mi-2 (CHD-type) and native RSC from yeast (SWI/SNF-type) repositioned the nucleosome at 10 bp intervals, which are intrinsic to the positioning sequence. Furthermore, RSC-catalyzed nucleosome translocation was noticeably more efficient when beyond the influence of this sequence. Interestingly, under limiting ATP conditions RSC preferred to position the nucleosome with 20 bp intervals within the positioning sequence, suggesting that native RSC preferentially translocates nucleosomes with 15 to 25 bp DNA steps.

Conclusions/Significance

Nucleosome repositioning thus appears to be influenced by both remodeler intrinsic and DNA sequence specific properties that interplay to define ATPase-catalyzed repositioning. Here we propose a successive three-step framework consisting of initiation, translocation and release steps to describe SNF2-type enzyme mediated nucleosome translocation along DNA. This conceptual framework helps resolve the apparent paradox between the high abundance of ATP-dependent remodelers per nucleus and the relative success of sequence-based predictions of nucleosome positioning in vivo.     

基于DNA变形能的核小体定位预测方法研究进展

真核细胞中,作为染色质基本结构单元的核小体参与调控基因的转录、DNA复制、重组以及RNA剪接等诸多生物学过程。阐明核小体定位机制并准确预测核小体在染色体上的位置对解读染色质结构与功能有重要生物学意义。在过去30多年时间里,研究人员发展了多种预测核小体位置的方法。最理想的方法应考虑DNA序列、组蛋白修饰和染色质重塑等影响核小体定位的诸多因素,然而现实中,捕捉主要因素的模型也往往具有很高的鲁棒性和实用价值。DNA序列偏好性是在全基因组尺度上影响核小体定位的最重要因素之一,因此基于DNA序列的核小体定位预测方法也最常见。这种方法可大致分为两类,即基于DNA序列信息的生物信息学模型和基于DNA变形能的生物物理学模型。本文重点介绍生物物理学模型近些年取得的主要进展。     

Positioning of a Nucleosome on Mouse Satellite DNA Inserted into a Yeast Plasmid Is Determined by Its DNA Sequence and an Adjacent Nucleosome

It has earlier been shown that multiple positioning of nucleosomes on mouse satellite DNA is determined by its nucleotide sequence. To clarify whether other factors, such as boundary ones, can affect the positionings, we modified the environment of satellite DNA monomer by inserting it into a yeast plasmid between inducible GalCyc promoter and a structural region of the yeast FLP gene. We have revealed that the positions of nucleosomes on satellite DNA are identical to those detected upon reconstruction in vitro. The positioning signal (GAAAAA sequence) of satellite DNA governs nucleosome location at the adjacent nucleotide sequence as well. Upon promoter induction the nucleosome, translationally positioned on the GalCyc promoter, transfers to the satellite DNA and its location follows the positioning signal of the latter. Thus, the alternatives of positioning of a nucleosome on satellite DNA are controlled by its nucleotide sequence, though the choice of one of them is determined by the adjacent nucleosome.     

Structural features of a regulatory nucleosome

DNA sequences from the long terminal repeat of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV-LTR) position nucleosomes both in vivo and in vitro. Here, were present chromatin reconstitution experiments showing that MMTV-LTR sequences from -236 to +204 accommodate two histone octamers in positions compatible with the in vivo data. This positioning is not influenced by the length of the DNA fragment and occurs in linear as well as in closed circular DNA molecules. MMTV-LTR DNA sequences show an intrinsic bendability that closely resembles its wrapping around the histone octamer. We propose that bendability is responsible for the observed rotational nucleosome positioning. Translational nucleosome positioning seems also to be determined by the DNA sequence. These data, along with the results from reconstitution experiments with insertion mutants, support a modular model of nucleosome phasing on MMTV-LTR, where the actual positioning of the histone octamer results from the additive effect of multiple features of the DNA sequence.     

Nucleosome Positioning,Nucleosome Spacing and the Nucleosome Code

Abstract

Nucleosome positioning has been the subject of intense study for many years. The properties of micrococcal nuclease, the enzyme central to these studies, are discussed. The various methods used to determine nucleosome positions in vitro and in vivo are reviewed critically. These include the traditional low resolution method of indirect end-labelling, high resolution methods such as primer extension, monomer extension and nucleosome sequencing, and the high throughput methods for genome-wide analysis (microarray hybridisation and parallel sequencing). It is established that low resolution mapping yields an averaged chromatin structure, whereas high resolution mapping reveals the weighted superposition of all the chromatin states in a cell population. Mapping studies suggest that yeast DNA contains information specifying the positions of nucleosomes and that this code is made use of by the cell. It is proposed that the positioning code facilitates nucleosome spacing by encoding information for multiple alternative overlapping nucleosomal arrays. Such a code might facilitate the shunting of nucleosomes from one array to another by ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling machines.     

A signal encoded in vertebrate DNA that influences nucleosome positioning and alignment.

Evidence is provided that the nucleotide triplet con-sensus non-T(A/T)G (abbreviated to VWG) influences nucleosome positioning and nucleosome alignment into regular arrays. This triplet consensus has been recently found to exhibit a fairly strong 10 bp periodicity in human DNA, implicating it in anisotropic DNA bendability. It is demonstrated that the experimentally determined preferences for nucleosome positioning in native SV40 chromatin can, to a large extent, be pre-dicted simply by counting the occurrences of the period-10 VWG consensus. Nucleosomes tend to form in regions of the SV40 genome that contain high counts of period-10 VWG and/or avoid regions with low counts. In contrast, periodic occurrences of the dinucleotides AA/TT, implicated in the rotational positioning of DNA in nucleosomes, did not correlate with the preferred nucleosome locations in SV40 chromatin. Periodic occurrences of AA did correlate with preferred nucleosome locations in a region of SV40 DNA where VWG occurrences are low. Regular oscillations in period-10 VWG counts with a dinucleosome period were found in vertebrate DNA regions that aligned nucleosomes into regular arrays in vitro in the presence of linker histone. Escherichia coli and plasmid DNA, which fail to align nucleosomes in vitro, lacked these regular VWG oscillations.     

Nucleosome structure and repair of N-methylpurines in the GAL1-10 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Nucleosome structure and repair of N-methylpurines were analyzed at nucleotide resolution in the divergent GAL1-10 genes of intact yeast cells, encompassing their common upstream-activating sequence. In glucose cultures where genes are repressed, nucleosomes with fixed positions exist in regions adjacent to the upstream-activating sequence, and the variability of nucleosome positioning sharply increases with increasing distance from this sequence. Galactose induction causes nucleosome disruption throughout the region analyzed, with those nucleosomes close to the upstream-activating sequence being most striking. In glucose cultures, a strong correlation between N-methylpurine repair and nucleosome positioning was seen in nucleosomes with fixed positions, where slow and fast repair occurred in nucleosome core and linker DNA, respectively. Galactose induction enhanced N-methylpurine repair in both strands of nucleosome core DNA, being most dramatic in the clearly disrupted, fixed nucleosomes. Furthermore, N-methylpurines are repaired primarily by the Mag1-initiated base excision repair pathway, and nucleotide excision repair contributes little to repair of these lesions. Finally, N-methylpurine repair is significantly affected by nearest-neighbor nucleotides, where fast and slow repair occurred in sites between pyrimidines and purines, respectively. These results indicate that nucleosome positioning and DNA sequence significantly modulate Mag1-initiated base excision repair in intact yeast cells.