The midabdominal TRAM flap for breast reconstruction in morbidly obese patients

The transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is ideal for postmastectomy reconstruction but is tenuous in morbidly obese patients. Because of their relatively high incidence of postoperative complications, morbidly obese patients are often not considered candidates for autogenous reconstruction. The midabdominal TRAM flap has a more favorable anatomy and may represent an alternative technique in this patient population. The records of 18 morbidly obese patients who underwent postmastectomy reconstruction using a mid-abdominal TRAM flap from 1998 through 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. The mid-abdominal TRAM flap territory includes more of the supraumbilical region than the traditional TRAM flap, corresponding to an area with more abundant musculocutaneous perforators and greater dependence on the superior epigastric vascular system. All patients underwent unipedicled mid-abdominal TRAM flap surgery. Four patients with previous subumbilical midline incisions had a delay procedure with ligation of the inferior epigastric vessels. Complications investigated were flap necrosis greater than 10 percent or sufficient to require surgical revision, abdominal donor-site breakdown, seroma formation, umbilical necrosis, abdominal wall bulging or hernia, deep vein thrombosis, infected mesh, surgical revisions, fat necrosis, and extended hospital stay. At a mean follow-up time of 15.6 months (range, 12 to 24 months), three patients had postoperative complications requiring surgical revision. Two of these patients had previous midline abdominal incisions. One patient had both partial flap necrosis and a donor-site complication. The second patient had partial flap necrosis, and the third had an abdominal donor-site complication. No occurrences of abdominal wall hernia, total flap loss, deep vein thrombosis, infected mesh, extensive surgical revision, or extended hospitalization were noted in this series. The mid-abdominal TRAM flap represents an alternative method for postmastectomy breast reconstruction in morbidly obese patients. Autologous reconstruction using a midabdominal TRAM flap may be considered in this patient population; however, additional research is required to conclusively demonstrate an improved outcome when compared with traditional reconstructive methods.     

The use of a subfascial vicryl mesh buttress to aid in the closure of massive ventral hernias following damage-control laparotomy

Damage control laparotomy for life-threatening abdominal conditions has gained wide acceptance in the management of exsanguinating trauma patients as well as septic patients with acute abdomen. Survivors considered too ill to undergo definitive abdominal wall closure are temporized, often with skin grafting on granulated viscera. These maneuvers compromise the integrity of the anterior abdominal wall and result in a subset of patients with loss of abdominal domain and massive, debilitating ventral hernias. A retrospective review was conducted of 21 such patients (16 men, five women) who underwent elective abdominal wall reconstruction at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between November of 1998 and October of 2000. The purpose of this study was to report the authors' experience with these complex abdominal wall reconstructions. A double-layer, subfascial Vicryl mesh buttress was used in all repairs to aid in reestablishing abdominal wall integrity. The mean hernia size was 813 cm2 (range, 75 to 1836 cm2), and the average interval to definitive repair was 24.4 months (range, 3 weeks to 11 years). Mean follow-up was 13.5 months (range, 1 month to 40 months). Twenty patients (95 percent) had successful ventral hernia repair. Four patients with massive hernias (924 to 1836 cm2) required submuscular Marlex mesh implantation. Two patients (10 percent) developed abdominal compartment syndrome that required surgical decompression. One patient (5 percent) developed an incisional hernia at a prior colostomy site. Four patients (19 percent) had superficial skin dehiscence that healed secondarily with daily wound care. There were no mesh infections. In most cases, successful single-stage repair of large ventral hernias following damage control laparotomy can be achieved using a subfascial Vicryl mesh buttress in combination with other established reconstructive techniques. Massive defects exceeding 900 cm2 typically require permanent mesh implantation to achieve fascial closure and to minimize the risk of postoperative abdominal compartment syndrome and recurrent herniation. This technique represents an improved solution to a complicated problem and optimizes the aesthetic and functional outcome for these debilitated patients.     

The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients

The authors retrospectively reviewed the computerized records of 71 women undergoing 80 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions after mastectomy over a 1-year period. There were 33 normal, 26 overweight, and 12 obese patients. No statistically significant difference in flap complications was found between groups. Overall fat necrosis rates were 11.4 percent for the normal-weight patients, 6.7 percent for the overweight patients, and 6.7 percent for the obese patients. Postoperative hospital time was similar for all groups. The occurrence of abdominal wall fascial laxity was uncommon and similar for all groups. Large (>900 g) reconstructions were completed without prohibitive complications in the reconstruction flap. The DIEP flap represents a significant advance in autologous breast tissue reconstruction. Although concerns regarding fat necrosis rates in DIEP flaps have been voiced, the authors did not see an increasing rate of fat necrosis in their overweight and obese patients, and their overall rate of fat necrosis is comparable to rates reported for free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. Also, increasing body mass index did not seem to affect the rate of delayed complications of the abdominal wall, such as abdominal wall hernia or bulging. Although it was not statistically significant, the authors did observe a trend toward increased wound-healing complications with increasing body mass index. Their data also support the claim that the complete sparing of the rectus abdominis muscles afforded by the DIEP flap avoids abdominal wall fascial bulging or defects often seen in obese TRAM reconstruction patients. Because flap and wound complication rates are similar or superior to those of other autologous tissue reconstruction techniques and the occurrence of abdominal wall defects is all but eliminated, the DIEP flap likely represents the preferred autologous breast reconstruction technique for overweight and obese patients.     

The coincidence of TRAM flaps and prostheses in the setting of breast reconstruction

It is well known that transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps can be used to replace unsatisfactory prosthetic breast reconstructions; however, little has been written about the scope of breast implant use in TRAM flap patients. In this study, to ascertain the range of such therapeutic options, their frequency, and their clinical outcomes, the authors retrospectively reviewed the senior author's breast reconstruction experience from 1989 to 2000 with patients in whom both a TRAM flap and an implant were used for breast reconstruction. The authors examined the surgical indications, body habitus, bra size, chest wall irradiation history, flap type, implant type, complications, and outcomes for those patients with TRAM flap and breast implant combinations.Thirty-two women who had 50 (various) combinations of a TRAM flap and a breast implant were identified. There were more clinical scenarios than patients because many of the women had multiple scenarios. The 50 combination scenarios were then divided into six groups. Group I consisted of 14 patients who had elective prostheses placed beneath simultaneous TRAM flaps; group II consisted of 10 patients who had TRAM flaps with contralateral prosthetic reconstruction (in which two implants were received before the TRAM flaps, five implants were received simultaneously with the TRAM flaps, and three implants were received after the TRAM flaps); group III consisted of eight patients who had contralateral augmentation in addition to their TRAM flaps; group IV consisted of 11 patients who had TRAM flaps that were used to cover or replace previous prosthetic reconstructions; group V consisted of four patients in whom prostheses were used to augment or improve previous TRAM flap reconstructions; and group VI consisted of three patients who required prostheses to either reconstruct or salvage total or near-total TRAM flap failures. A broad range of implant types was used, although anatomic saline implants predominated. Forty-one percent of the patients in the review had undergone irradiation during the course of their treatment for breast cancer. Eight of the 32 patients experienced a total of twelve complications, four of which were related to the implants and eight of which involved the TRAM flaps and abdominal donor sites.Although complex, the wide variety of potential TRAM flap/breast implant combinations can be useful for patients with challenging reconstructive scenarios, particularly those that involve radiation therapy. In the group of patients reviewed by the authors, TRAM flaps were most often used in successful partnership either on the same side as or opposite to an implant reconstruction. A TRAM flap was used to salvage or replace an unsatisfactory implant reconstruction in less than a third of the patients. From a risk point of view, implants used opposite a TRAM flap reconstruction had a lower incidence of complication than did implants used beneath TRAM flaps.     

Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps

Breast reconstruction using the lower abdominal free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap has the potential to virtually eliminate abdominal donor-site morbidity because the rectus abdominis fascia and muscle are not incised or excised. However, despite its advantages, the free SIEA flap for breast reconstruction is rarely used. A prospective study was conducted of the reliability and outcomes of the use of SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction compared with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Breast reconstruction with an SIEA flap was attempted in 47 consecutive free autologous tissue breast reconstructions between August of 2001 and November of 2002. The average patient age was 49 years, and the average body mass index was 27 kg/m. The SIEA flap was used in 14 (30 percent) of these breast reconstructions in 12 patients. An SIEA flap was not used in the remaining 33 cases because the SIEA was absent or was deemed too small. The mean superficial inferior epigastric vessel pedicle length was approximately 7 cm. The internal mammary vessels were used as recipients in all SIEA flap cases so that the flap could be positioned sufficiently medially on the chest wall. The average hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with SIEA flaps than it was for those who underwent reconstruction with TRAM or DIEP flaps. Of the 47 free flaps, one SIEA flap was lost because of arterial thrombosis. Medium-size and large breasts were reconstructed with hemi-lower abdominal SIEA flaps, with aesthetic results similar to those obtained with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The free SIEA flap is an attractive option for autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Harvest of this flap does not injure the anterior rectus fascia or underlying rectus abdominis muscle. This can potentially eliminate abdominal donor-site complications such as bulge and hernia formation, and decrease weakness, discomfort, and hospital stay compared with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The disadvantages of an SIEA flap are a smaller pedicle diameter and shorter pedicle length than TRAM and DIEP flaps and the absence or inadequacy of an arterial pedicle in most patients. Nevertheless, in selected patients, the SIEA flap offers advantages over the TRAM and DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.     

Recurrent ventral herniation in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is an inherited collagen disorder characterized by skin hyperextensibility, joint laxity, and tissue friability. In this study, it was hypothesized that Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is frequently undiagnosed in patients who present for repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias. A retrospective chart review was conducted, and patients who had presented for elective repair of recurrent abdominal wall herniation were identified. In all patients, one or more prior attempts at repair with either mesh or autologous tissues had failed. Patients in whom abdominal wall components were lost secondary to extirpation or trauma, patients who had required acute closure, and patients with less than 2 months of follow-up were excluded. Twenty patients met these criteria. Twenty cases of recurrent ventral hernia repairs were reviewed, with special attention to identification of the preoperative diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Patients ranged in age from 29 to 75 years, with a mean age of 54 years. Five patients were male (25 percent), and 15 were female (75 percent). The majority (95 percent) were Caucasian. The most common initial procedures were gynecologic in origin (35 percent). A precise closure technique that minimizes recurrence after ventral hernia repairs was used. With use of this technique, there was only one recurrence over a follow-up period that ranged from 2 to 60 months (mean follow-up duration, 25.7 months). Two patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome were identified, and their cases are presented in this article. The "components separation" technique with primary component approximation and mesh overlay was used for defect closure in the two cases presented. The identification of these two patients suggests the possibility of underdiagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome among patients who undergo repeated ventral hernia repair and who have had previous adverse postoperative outcomes. There are no previous reports in the literature that address recurrent ventral abdominal herniation in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.     

Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis transfer.

The abdominal wall function of 57 patients who have undergone TRAM flap breast reconstructions using the whole rectus muscle, on one side (33 patients) or both (24 patients), was evaluated 6 months to 2 years after surgery. The defect was repaired with a Teflon mesh buried in the rectus sheath. There was a perfect tolerance to the mesh, and no hernia or bulging of the abdominal wall developed. Patients had less back pain after (10 patients) than before (18 patients) the operation and found their sit-up and sport possibilities about the same as before. Detailed assessment of the abdominal muscles by the physiotherapist showed, however, a decreased function, more evident in bilateral cases. CT scans demonstrated a medialization of the lateral muscles, leaving only a small medial portion of the abdominal wall devoid of muscles. On the whole, no problem of clinical significance was encountered, and patients showed a high degree of satisfaction with the operation.     

Evaluation of abdominal wall strength after TRAM flap surgery

Evaluation of abdominal wall function after transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery has been mostly subjective. The purpose of this study was to measure abdominal wall strength objectively and to compare the results with the patient's performance of daily activities. Abdominal wall strength was objectively measured with the B200 IsoStation machine preoperatively and 1 year after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. These data were compared with the results of a questionnaire evaluating the patient's performance of daily activities. The results of this testing in 21 patients demonstrated the following: (1) a decrease in abdominal wall strength after bilateral pedicled TRAM flap surgery, which was significant in trunk flexion (34.2 +/- 16.9 ft-lbs to 20.6 +/- 15.2 ft-lbs); (2) compensation by other truncal musculature, with an increase in the strength of trunk rotation (18.8 +/- 13.5 ft-lbs to 28.6 +/- 17.7 ft-lbs) seen after unilateral pedicled TRAM flap surgery; (3) minimal interference with the patient's daily activities; and (4) no effect of mesh on strength. A relationship was demonstrated between the degree of loss of strength in trunk flexion and the patient's difficulty in performing certain activities. The patients who had the greatest loss in trunk flexion following the use of both pedicles also had the most difficulty in performing some daily activities. The patients were satisfied with their reconstructive procedure, with an average score of 8.3 (on a scale of 1 to 10), and reported an improvement in the appearance of their abdomen, with an average increase of 5.1 to 6.8 (on a scale of 1 to 10).     

TRAM flap breast reconstruction: tumescent technique reduces blood loss and transfusion requirement

The tumescent technique has been shown to be efficacious in reducing both operative and postoperative bleeding without significant deleterious side effects in suction lipectomy. In this study, the effects of the tumescent technique on postoperative complications in transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction are investigated. All women who underwent a TRAM flap breast reconstruction by the senior author (J.B.) at the Emory Clinic during the years 1990 to 1996 were pooled (n = 386). Any woman who had a preincision infiltration of 0.25% epinephrine-containing saline solution (>200 cc) around the donor site was included in the tumescent group (n = 59). Medical records were reviewed, and rates of partial flap loss, fat necrosis (> or =10 percent flap volume), flap full-thickness skin loss, donor-site complication (skin loss, hernia, or infection), and blood transfusion were determined. Group rates were compared. The infiltrated group had a significantly lower transfusion rate as compared with the control group (0.34 units versus 1.32 units, p < 0.001). The rates of partial flap loss and fat necrosis were less in the tumescent group, but not significantly (0 percent versus 4 percent, p = 0.232; and 1.7 percent versus 10.4 percent, p = 0.058). There were no significant differences in the incidence of full-thickness skin loss or donor-site complications. Donor-site infiltration before incision with a 0.25% epinephrine-containing saline solution significantly reduced the transfusion requirement in TRAM flap breast reconstruction patients without adversely affecting either breast mound or abdominal donor-site complication rates.     

Significance of intraabdominal compartment pressures following TRAM flap breast reconstruction and the correlation of results

Abdominal wall closure after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction is often performed under considerable tension and may theoretically cause a component of abdominal compartment syndrome. This prospective study examined intraabdominal pressure after TRAM reconstruction and correlated the findings with clinical course and outcome.All patients who underwent pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction from November of 1999 to December of 2000 (n = 77) were included and compared with nonoperative controls (n = 24). Intraabdominal pressures were measured indirectly using the urinary catheter in the postanesthesia care unit on postoperative days 1 and 2. Outcome measures included vital signs, urinary output, net 24-degree fluid balance, and complications. The preoperative variables were age, body mass index, parity, and presence of an epidural. For statistical analysis, the TRAM patients were divided into three groups on the basis of type of closure (bipedicle, unipedicle, and mesh), which were compared by analysis of variance. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for patients with intraabdominal pressures > or =20 mmHg who were thought to have a component of abdominal compartment syndrome. The incidence of complications was compared by chi-square, with statistical significance determined for p < 0.05.Average intraabdominal pressures were significantly higher in the bipedicled TRAM (14.1 mmHg) and unipedicle TRAM (9.9 mmHg) groups when compared with the mesh group (5 mmHg) and controls (3.7 mmHg; p < 0.001). Increased intraabdominal pressure was transient and peaked on postoperative day 1. Elevated pressure was associated with decreased urinary output, decreased net fluid balance, and increased respiratory rate. Patients with intraabdominal pressures > or =20 mmHg (n = 10) had a higher incidence of complications (60 percent) compared with patients who had pressures <20 mmHg (18 percent; p < 0.05). Elevated intraabdominal pressures were strongly associated with donor-site and general complications. Positive predictive factors for elevated pressure included body mass index and type of closure (bipedicled or bilateral). Multiple pregnancies seemed to have a protective effect.A transient component of abdominal compartment syndrome does exist after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Bipedicle closure, nulliparous women, and increased body mass index were risk factors for elevated intraabdominal pressures. Tension-free mesh closure seemed to have a protective effect. Symptomatic trends and certain complications were associated with, and possibly explained by, an elevated intraabdominal pressure.     

Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates

In cases of unilateral breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, poorly perfused tissue, which is normally excised to avoid subsequent fat necrosis, must sometimes be used to achieve adequate breast size and projection. In such cases, incorporation of a second vascular pedicle into the flap design improves perfusion. The authors retrospectively examined their experience with bipedicled TRAM flap-based unilateral breast reconstruction to determine whether the use of microsurgical rather than conventional (nonmicrosurgical) techniques for flap transfer resulted in lower incidences of flap-site fat necrosis and donor-site hernia/bulge. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a bipedicled TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap between January of 1991 and March of 2001. Group 1 consisted of patients who had undergone flap transfer using a conventional technique for both pedicles; group 2, patients who had flap transfer using a conventional technique for one pedicle and a microsurgical technique for the other; and group 3, patients who had flap transfer using a microsurgical technique for both pedicles. Of the 863 patients identified, 72 (8.3 percent) had undergone reconstruction using a bipedicled flap. There were 43 patients in group 1, 24 patients in group 2, and five patients in group 3. Only one case of total flap loss had occurred (group 1). Partial flap loss occurred in two patients in group 1 (5 percent) and three patients in group 2 (13 percent). Fat necrosis occurred more frequently in groups 1 (23 percent) and 2 (29 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.5, Fisher's exact test). Similarly, bulge or hernia was more common in groups 1 (12 percent) and 2 (4 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.6, Fisher's exact test). In this study, patients who received a bipedicled TRAM flap using microsurgical techniques alone (group 3) appeared to have better flap perfusion and less frequent hernia/bulge than did patients who underwent flap transfer using conventional (group 1) or combined techniques (group 2). However, these differences were not statistically significant, and this trend must be verified in a larger study.     

Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction

Free pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction is often advocated as the procedure of choice for autogenous tissue breast reconstruction in high-risk patients, such as smokers. However, whether use of the free TRAM flap is a desirable option for breast reconstruction in smokers is still unclear. All patients undergoing breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps at our institution between February of 1989 and May of 1998 were reviewed. Patients were classified as smokers, former smokers (patients who had stopped smoking at least 4 weeks before surgery), and nonsmokers. Flap and donor-site complications in the three groups were compared. Information on demographic characteristics, body mass index, and comorbid medical conditions was used to perform multivariate statistical analysis. A total of 936 breast reconstructions with free TRAM flaps were performed in 718 patients (80.9 percent immediate; 23.3 percent bilateral). There were 478 nonsmokers, 150 former smokers, and 90 smokers. Flap complications occurred in 222 (23.7 percent) of 936 flaps. Smokers had a higher incidence of mastectomy flap necrosis than nonsmokers (18.9 percent versus 9.0 percent; p = 0.005). Smokers who underwent immediate reconstruction had a significantly higher incidence of mastectomy skin flap necrosis than did smokers who underwent delayed reconstruction (21.7 percent versus 0 percent; p = 0.039). Donor-site complications occurred in 106 (14.8 percent) of 718 patients. Donor-site complications were more common in smokers than in former smokers (25.6 percent versus 10.0 percent; p = 0.001) or nonsmokers (25.6 percent versus 14.2 percent; p = 0.007). Compared with nonsmokers, smokers had significantly higher rates of abdominal flap necrosis (4.4 percent versus 0.8 percent; p = 0.025) and hernia (6.7 percent versus 2.1 percent; p = 0.016). No significant difference in complication rates was noted between former smokers and nonsmokers. Among smokers, patients with a smoking history of greater than 10 pack-years had a significantly higher overall complication rate compared with patients with a smoking history of 10 or fewer pack-years (55.8 percent versus 23.8 percent; p = 0.049). In summary, free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in smokers was not associated with a significant increase in the rates of vessel thrombosis, flap loss, or fat necrosis compared with rates in nonsmokers. However, smokers were at significantly higher risk for mastectomy skin flap necrosis, abdominal flap necrosis, and hernia compared with nonsmokers. Patients with a smoking history of greater than 10 pack-years were at especially high risk for perioperative complications, suggesting that this should be considered a relative contraindication for free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Smoking-related complications were significantly reduced when the reconstruction was delayed or when the patient stopped smoking at least 4 weeks before surgery.     

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation.

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps are related to the harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle. Abdominal contour was analyzed in 155 women who had breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps; 108 women had free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flaps, 37 had pedicled TRAM flaps, and 10 had deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. The reconstruction was unilateral in 110 women and bilateral in 45 women. Three methods of muscle-sparing were used; they are classified as preservation of the lateral muscle, preservation of the medial and lateral muscle, or preservation of the entire muscle. One of these three methods of muscle-sparing was used in 91 women (59 percent) and no muscle-sparing was used in 64 women (41 percent). Postoperative contour abnormalities occurred in 15 woman and included epigastric fullness in five, upper bulge in three, and lower bulge in 10. One woman experienced two abnormalities, one woman experienced three, and no woman developed a hernia. Of these abnormalities, 11 occurred after the free TRAM flap, seven after the pedicled TRAM flap, and none after the DIEP flap. Bilateral reconstruction resulted in 11 abnormalities in nine women, and unilateral reconstruction resulted in seven abnormalities in six women. chi2 analysis of the free and pedicled TRAM flaps demonstrates that muscle-sparing explains the observed differences in upper bulge and upper fullness (p = 0.02), with a trend toward significance for lower bulge (p = 0.06). chi2 analysis of the free TRAM and DIEP flaps does not explain the observed difference in abnormal abdominal contour. Analysis of muscle-sparing and non-muscle-sparing methods demonstrates that the observed difference between the techniques is only explained for a lower bulge after the bilateral free TRAM flap (p = 0.04).     

Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction

Immediate breast reconstruction using the transverse abdominal myocutaneous island (TRAM) flap was performed in 54 patients over the past 3 years at our institution. This represented approximately 59 percent of patients undergoing all types of immediate breast reconstruction. In 10 patients, the abdominal island flap was transferred as a free flap based on the deep inferior epigastric pedicle. These patients were compared with the other 44 patients, in whom the flap was transferred using the conventional technique. The TRAM flap is well suited for immediate breast reconstruction because the procedure can be carried out simultaneously with mastectomy using separate operating teams and instruments. The operation is safe and relatively free of complications. The free TRAM group compared favorably with the conventional group in terms of complications, operating time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization, and return to functional baseline. The free TRAM flap appears to be as safe as the conventional technique with the advantages of a more limited rectus muscle harvest, improved medial contour of the breast due to the lack of tunneling, and perhaps a healthier flap because of the large donor vessels.     

Clinical results of TRAM flap delay by selective embolization of the deep inferior epigastric arteries

Preoperative selective embolization of the deep inferior epigastric arteries constitutes a new technique in TRAM flap delay. Whereas surgical ligation of these vessels has proved to be an effective delay procedure in experimental and clinical settings, it requires an additional operative step under general anesthesia. Despite the introduction of the free TRAM leading to improved flap perfusion, this microsurgical technique is not always available because of the requirements of specialized equipment and staff, longer operating hours, and subsequently higher expenses. The search for a minimally invasive, easy, and inexpensive technique to improve perfusion of the pedicled TRAM flap led us to selective embolization of the deep inferior epigastric arteries by an angiographic procedure. After 4 years of experience with this technique, we now present the first clinical results. Breast reconstruction by a delayed pedicled TRAM flap was performed in 40 patients with a mean age of 48.4 years (range, 31 to 66 years). The mean interval between embolization and surgery was 3.6 months. Postoperative data concerning flap survival and complications were available for all patients. Embolization of the deep inferior epigastric arteries was performed bilaterally in 35 patients (87.5 percent) and unilaterally in 5 patients (12.5 percent). Radiotherapy had been applied in 21 patients (52.5 percent) before surgery. Postoperative flap complications consisted of partial necrosis in three (7.5 percent), fat necrosis in one (2.5 percent), impaired wound healing in five (12.5 percent), and postoperative bleeding in two patients (5 percent). Abdominal wound healing complications occurred in six patients (15 percent), abdominal wall weakness in eight (20 percent), and hernia formation in four (10 percent). Surgical corrections were performed at the breast (TRAM flap) in 22 patients (55 percent) and at the abdomen (donor site) in 9 (22.5 percent). Preoperative selective embolization of the deep inferior epigastric arteries constitutes an alternative delay procedure for the pedicled TRAM flap. It is superior to the conventional procedure without delay, offers several advantages compared with surgical ligation of these vessels, and represents an alternative to the free TRAM flap in selected cases.     

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction: a multifactorial analysis.

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction occur with all methods of flap elevation and include lower and upper abdominal laxity, epigastric fullness, and hernia. This study is a retrospective analysis of 101 women comparing the many variables that may contribute to an abnormal contour. Statistical analysis comparing the free, pedicled, unilateral, bilateral, muscle-sparing, and non-muscle-sparing flaps was completed using logistic regression. Associated factors, including diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, use of mesh, and prior abdominal operations, were incorporated. Abnormal abdominal contour was present in 13 of 101 women and included 16 specific abnormalities. These included upper abdominal bulge in three women, lower abdominal bulge in eight, and epigastric fullness in five. No woman developed a hernia. Bifactorial analysis demonstrated a significant increase in abnormal contour for the pedicled, bilateral, and non-muscle-sparing TRAM groups when compared with their countervariable groups (free, unilateral, and muscle-sparing TRAM, respectively; p < 0.05). Multifactorial analysis demonstrated a significant increase in abnormal contour in two subgroups (p < 0.05). An analysis of associated factors demonstrated a significant increase in abnormal contour for the bilateral TRAM in the presence of a prior lower midline incision (p < 0.05).     

Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?

The advantages of breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (MS-2) are well recognized. Both techniques optimize abdominal function by maintaining the vascularity, innervation, and continuity of the rectus abdominis muscle. The purpose of this study was to compare these two methods of breast reconstruction and determine whether there is a difference in outcome. The study considered 177 women who have had breast reconstruction using muscle-sparing flaps over a 4-year period. This includes 89 women who had an MS-2 free TRAM flap procedure, of which 65 were unilateral and 24 were bilateral, and 88 women who had a DIEP flap procedure, of which 66 were unilateral and 22 were bilateral. The total number of flaps was 223. Mean follow-up was 23 months (range, 3 to 49 months). For all MS-2 free TRAM flaps (n = 113), outcome included fat necrosis in eight (7.1 percent), venous congestion in three (2.7 percent), and total necrosis in two (1.8 percent). For the women who had an MS-2 free TRAM flap, an abdominal bulge occurred in three women (4.6 percent) after unilateral reconstruction and in five women (21 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. The ability to perform sit-ups was noted in 63 women (97 percent) after unilateral reconstruction and 20 women (83 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. For all DIEP flaps (n = 110), outcome included fat necrosis in seven (6.4 percent), venous congestion in five (4.5 percent), and total necrosis in three (2.7 percent) patients. For the women who had DIEP flap reconstruction, an abdominal bulge occurred in one woman (1.5 percent) after unilateral reconstruction and in one woman (4.5 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. The ability to perform sit-ups was noted in all women after unilateral reconstruction and in 21 women (95 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. These results demonstrate that there are no significant differences in fat necrosis, venous congestion, or flap necrosis after DIEP or MS-2 free TRAM flap reconstruction. The percentage of women who are able to perform sit-ups and the percentage of women who did not develop a postoperative abdominal bulge is increased after DIEP flap reconstruction; however, this difference is not statistically significant.     

TRAM flap versus nonautologous breast reconstruction: what do patients really think?

Although there have been many reports of aesthetic outcomes after breast reconstruction, there have been comparatively few studies examining patient satisfaction and related subjective issues. The variables affecting satisfaction are only beginning to be understood, and patient satisfaction issues were explored in a more homogeneous patient population. A questionnaire surveying overall and aesthetic satisfaction, postoperative recuperation time, and symptoms was used to elicit candid patient responses. Fifty-seven patients replied (86 percent response rate), of whom 38 had undergone transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (pedicled, n = 29; free, n = 9) reconstruction and 19 had undergone nonautologous reconstruction. Although the median patient satisfaction score was higher for the TRAM flap group, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.92). Recuperation was significantly longer for the TRAM flap group, with only 47 percent of patients being able to resume full activities within 2 months after the surgical procedure, compared with 95 percent of the implant group (p = 0.002). Of the TRAM flap-treated patients, 50 percent described some postoperative abdominal weakness, but only 5 percent of all TRAM flap-treated patients said that abdominal weakness was actually a functional problem. Our results suggest that patients may derive equal satisfaction with the two methods of reconstruction. The postoperative recuperation time after TRAM flap reconstruction is significantly longer than that after nonautologous procedures, although the postoperative abdominal weakness after TRAM flap reconstruction is not as significant a clinical problem as previously thought. The patient-derived information on satisfaction should assist both surgeons and patients in matching reconstructive options with patients' expectations and lifestyle.     

Evaluation of abdominal sensibility after TRAM flap breast reconstruction

One commonly expressed concern regarding transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction surgery is the return of sensation to the abdomen. Although many studies have focused on abdominal wall muscle incompetence or herniation, there is limited literature discussing postoperative abdominal sensation. The purpose of this study was to assess abdominal sensation a minimum of 1 year after pedicled TRAM flap surgery for breast reconstruction. Twenty-five female patients who underwent TRAM flap breast reconstruction a minimum of 1 year before the study were compared with 10 female volunteer controls. Subject and control abdomens were specifically divided into 12 zones, then assessed for superficial touch, superficial pain, temperature, and vibration using various techniques. Fischer's exact test was used for analysis with the p value set at p = 0.05. The degree to which superficial touch was affected was then tested using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Student's t test was used for analysis with the p value set at p = 0.05. For all four sensory modalities, subjects were found to have decreased sensation in zones 5 and 8, the supraumbilical and infraumbilical regions. This was statistically significant. When assessed with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, the sensation of the subjects' abdomens was significantly decreased compared with controls. Significance was found in all zones. This study clearly demonstrates that there is a significant and persistent reduction in abdominal sensibility following TRAM flap surgery. The distribution of the deficits is consistent and involves the midline supraumbilical and infraumbilical regions. The TRAM flap has become the procedure of choice for postmastectomy autogenous breast reconstruction. It provides the plastic surgeon with a relatively safe, reliable, and aesthetically pleasing method of breast reconstruction. Since its inception, the TRAM flap and its abdominal closure have undergone numerous modifications designed to minimize donor-site morbidity and create a natural-looking breast. In addition to creating an aesthetically pleasing breast, the TRAM flap has the potential advantage of postoperative improvement in abdominal contour.     

Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction after whole-breast irradiation

Traditional breast conservation therapy consists of lumpectomy and whole-breast irradiation. Local recurrence after breast conservation is usually managed with salvage mastectomy. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction is an accepted method of managing primary breast malignancies with exceptional aesthetic results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this technique in the previously irradiated breast. This study is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with autologous tissue after failed breast conservation therapy between 1995 and 1999. There were 11 patients with a mean age of 45 years (range, 34 to 58 years). Initial lumpectomy was performed for ductal carcinoma in situ in six patients and infiltrating carcinoma (ductal or lobular) in five patients. The interval from lumpectomy to salvage mastectomy ranged from 12 to 169 months (mean, 44 months). Reconstructive techniques included unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (n = 4), free TRAM flap (n = 4), and latissimus flap with immediate placement of a saline implant (n = 3). Flap survival was 100 percent, and there were no early flap complications. One patient developed partial-thickness mastectomy flap loss (3 x 3 cm), which was managed conservatively. There were no instances of full-thickness mastectomy skin loss. Late complications included capsular contracture (n = 2), fat necrosis (n = 1), and ventral hernia (n = 1). There was one late death from metastatic disease; the remaining patients were without evidence of disease at a mean of 48 months (range, 30 to 75 months). Aesthetic results were judged as excellent (n = 4), good (n = 5), fair (n = 1), and poor (n = 1). These results demonstrate that skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction can be safely performed in patients with previous whole-breast irradiation. Clearly, patient selection is paramount with attention to the quality of the irradiated breast skin and the anatomic location of the recurrent disease. In this experience, the best results were seen after TRAM (pedicled or free) flap reconstruction.