Analysis of Drosophila 26 S proteasome using RNA interference.

We have utilized double-stranded RNA interference (RNAi) to examine the effects of reduced expression of individual subunits of the 26 S proteasome in Drosophila S2 cells. RNAi significantly decreased mRNA and protein levels of targeted subunits of both the core 20 S proteasome and the PA700 regulatory complex. Cells deficient in any of several 26 S proteasome subunits (e.g. d beta 5, dRpt1, dRpt2, dRpt5, dRpn2, and dRpn12) displayed decreased proteasome activity (as judged by hydrolysis of succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-aminomethylcoumarin), increased apoptosis, decreased cell proliferation without a specific block of the cell cycle, and accumulation of ubiquitinated cellular proteins. RNAi of many individual 26 S proteasome subunits promoted increased expression of many non-targeted subunits. This effect was not mimicked by chemical proteasome inhibitors such as lactacystin. Reduced expression of most targeted subunits disrupted the assembly of the 26 S proteasome. RNAi of six of eight targeted PA700 subunits disrupted that structure and caused accumulation of increased levels of uncapped 20 S proteasome. Notable exceptions included RNAi of dRpn10, a polyubiquitin binding subunit, and dUCH37, a ubiquitin isopeptidase. dRpn10-deficient cells showed a significant increase in succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-aminomethylcoumarin hydrolyzing activity of the 26 S proteasomes but accumulated polyubiquitinated proteins. d beta 5-Deficient cells had a phenotype similar to that of most PA700-deficient cells but also accumulated low molecular mass complexes containing subunits of the 20 S proteasome, probably representing unassembled precursors of the 20 S proteasomes. Cells deficient in several of the 26 S proteasome subunits were more resistant to otherwise toxic concentrations of various proteasome inhibitors. Our data suggest that those cells adapted to grow in conditions of impaired ubiquitin and proteasome-dependent protein degradation.     

Multiple chaperone-assisted formation of mammalian 20S proteasomes

Protein degradation is essential for maintenance of cellular homeostasis. The majority of proteins are selectively degraded in eukaryotic cells by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The 26S proteasome selects target proteins that are covalently modified with polyubiquitin chains. The 26S proteasome is a multisubunit protease responsible for regulated proteolysis in eukaryotic cells. The catalytic activities are carried out by the core 20S proteasome. The eukaryotic 20S proteasome is composed of 28 subunits arranged in a cylindrical particle as four heteroheptameric rings, alpha1-7beta1-7beta1-7alpha1-7. Recent studies have revealed the mechanism responsible for the assembly of such a complex structure. This article recounts the observations that disclosed the biogenesis of 20S proteasomes and discusses the difference in the mechanism of assembly between archael, yeast, and mammalian 20S proteasomes.     

The 20S/26S proteasomal pathway of protein degradation in muscle tissue

Similar to all other eukaryotic cells and tissues muscle tissue contains the proteolytic system of 20S/26S proteasomes with the 20S proteasome existing predominantly in a latent state. Unlike with the mammalian enzymein vitro transition from the latent to the activated state of the 20S proteasomes isolated from muscle of several fish species and from lobster can be achieved by heat shock. It is very likely that the activated state of the 20S proteasome corresponds to the physiologically active form of the enzyme since only that one is able to attack sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar proteins to any significant extent. As perfusion of rat hindquarters with presumptive low molecular mass activators like free fatty acids does not result in an activation of the muscle proteasome other — possibly protein activators — may serve this purposein vivo. The 26S proteasome complex may be regarded as such a proteasome/activator complex. The 26S proteasome complex has the ability to degrade protein (-ubiquitin-conjugates) by an ATP-consuming reaction. Since increased amounts of ubiquitinated proteins as well as an enhanced activity of the ATP (-ubiquitin)-dependent proteolytic system have been measured in rat muscle tissue during various catabolic conditions, it is not unlikely that this pathway is responsible for catalysis of muscle protein breakdown.Abbreviations Bz benzoyl - PGPH peptidylglutamylpeptide hydrolysing - Suc succinyl - Z benzyloxycarbonyl     

Interaction between alphaB-crystallin and the human 20S proteasomal subunit C8/alpha7

alphaB-Crystallin, a member of the small heat shock protein (sHsp) family, can bind unfolding proteins, but is unable to refold them. To fulfil its protective function in vivo it is therefore likely to interact with other cellular proteins. Here we report that alphaB-crystallin binds very specifically both in vitro and in vivo to C8/alpha7, one of the 14 subunits of the 20S proteasome. The C8/alpha7 protein forms heterogeneous complexes with alphaB-crystallin of about 540 kDa. However, no strong interaction between alphaB-crystallin and 20S proteasomes was observed. Since both proteins are localized in the cytoplasm, the interaction between alphaB-crystallin and C8/alpha7 subunit might affect the assembly of the proteasome complex or facilitate the degradation of unfolded proteins bound to alphaB-crystallin.     

Interplay between recombinant Hsp70 and proteasomes: proteasome activity modulation and ubiquitin-independent cleavage of Hsp70

The heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70, human HSPA1A) plays indispensable roles in cellular stress responses and protein quality control (PQC). In the framework of PQC, it cooperates with the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) to clear damaged and dysfunctional proteins in the cell. Moreover, Hsp70 itself is rapidly degraded following the recovery from stress. It was demonstrated that its fast turnover is mediated via ubiquitination and subsequent degradation by the 26S proteasome. At the same time, the effect of Hsp70 on the functional state of proteasomes has been insufficiently investigated. Here, we characterized the direct effect of recombinant Hsp70 on the activity of 20S and 26S proteasomes and studied Hsp70 degradation by the 20S proteasome in vitro. We have shown that the activity of purified 20S proteasomes is decreased following incubation with recombinant human Hsp70. On the other hand, high concentrations of Hsp70 activated 26S proteasomes. Finally, we obtained evidence that in addition to previously reported ubiquitin-dependent degradation, Hsp70 could be cleaved independent of ubiquitination by the 20S proteasome. The results obtained reveal novel aspects of the interplay between Hsp70 and proteasomes.     

20S proteasome biogenesis

26S proteasomes are multi-subunit protease complexes responsible for the turnover of short-lived proteins. Proteasomal degradation starts with the autocatalytic maturation of the 20S core particle. Here, we summarize different models of proteasome assembly. 20S proteasomes are assembled as precursor complexes containing alpha and unprocessed beta subunits. The propeptides of the beta subunits are thought to prevent premature conversion of the precursor complexes into matured particles and are needed for efficient beta subunit incorporation. The complex biogenesis is tightly regulated which requires additional components such as the maturation factor Ump1/POMP, an ubiquitous protein in eukaryotic cells. Ump1/POMP is associated with precursor intermediates and degraded upon final maturation. Mammalian proteasomes are localized all over the cell, while yeast proteasomes mainly localize to the nuclear envelope/endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane network. The major localization of yeast proteasomes may point to the subcellular place of proteasome biogenesis.     

A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes

The 26S proteasome is a multisubunit protease responsible for regulated proteolysis in eukaryotic cells. It is composed of one catalytic 20S proteasome and two 19S regulatory particles attached on both ends of 20S proteasomes. Here, we describe the identification of Adrm1 as a novel proteasome interacting protein in mammalian cells. Although the overall sequence of Adrm1 has weak homology with the yeast Rpn13, the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions exhibit significant homology. Therefore, we designated it as hRpn13. hRpn13 interacts with a base subunit Rpn2 via its amino-terminus. The majority of 26S proteasomes contain hRpn13, but a portion of them does not, indicating that hRpn13 is not an integral subunit. Intriguingly, we found that hRpn13 recruits UCH37, a deubiquitinating enzyme known to associate with 26 proteasomes. The carboxyl-terminal regions containing KEKE motifs of both hRpn13 and UCH37 are involved in their physical interaction. Knockdown of hRpn13 caused no obvious proteolytic defect but loss of UCH37 proteins and decrease in deubiquitinating activity of 26S proteasomes. Our results indicate that hRpn13 is essential for the activity of UCH37.     

26 S proteasomes function as stable entities.

Most proteins in eukaryotic cells are degraded by 26-S proteasomes, usually after being conjugated to ubiquitin. In the absence of ATP, 26-S proteasomes fall apart into their two sub-complexes, 20-S proteasomes and PA700, which reassemble upon addition of ATP. Conceivably, 26-S proteasomes dissociate and reassemble during initiation of protein degradation in a ternary complex with the substrate, as in the dissociation-reassembly cycles found for ribosomes and the chaperonin GroEL/GroES. Here we followed disassembly and assembly of 26-S proteasomes in cell extracts as the exchange of PA700 subunits between mouse and human 26-S proteasomes. Compared to the rate of proteolysis in the same extract, the disassembly-reassembly cycle was much too slow to present an obligatory step in a degradation cycle. It has been suggested that subunit S5a (Mcb1, Rpn10), which binds poly-ubiquitin substrates, shuttles between a free state and the 26-S proteasome, bringing substrate to the complex. However, S5a was not found in the free state in HeLa cells. Besides, all subunits in PA700, including S5a, exchanged at similar low rates. It therefore seems that 26-S proteasomes function as stable entities during degradation of proteins.     

20S proteasome differentially alters translation of different mRNAs via the cleavage of eIF4F and eIF3

The molecular basis for coordinated regulation of protein synthesis and degradation is not understood. Here we report that the 20S proteasome endoproteolytically cleaves the translation initiation factors eIF4G, a subunit of eIF4F, and eIF3a, a subunit of eIF3. The cleavage of eIF4G or eIF3a differentially affects the assembly of ribosomal preinitiation complexes on different cellular and viral mRNAs in an in vitro system containing pure components. Inhibition of proteolytic activity of the 20S proteasome with specific inhibitors prevents cleavage of both factors in vitro and in vivo, restores assembly of ribosomal complexes in vitro, and differentially affects translation of different mRNAs in vivo. These studies demonstrate the importance of the endoproteolytic activity of proteasomes in regulation of cellular processes and suggest a link between protein synthesis and degradation.     

Regulation of the proteasome by AMPK in endothelial cells: the role of O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT)

26S proteasome is a macromolecular multi-subunit complex responsible for recognizing, unfolding, and ultimately destroying proteins. It remains poorly understood how 26S proteasome activity is regulated. The present study was to investigate if AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) functions as a physiological suppressor of the 26S proteasome in endothelial cells. 26S proteasome assembly, activity, and O-GlcNAcylation of P700 were assayed in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and mouse aortas isolated from C57BL6 wild type and AMPKα2 knockout mice with or without being exposed to selective AMPK activators or inhibitors. Pharmacological and genetic activation of AMPK effectively suppresses 26S proteasomes in endothelial cells. Conversely, inactivation of AMPK either pharmacologically or genetically increases 26S proteasome activity; furthermore, the inactivation decreases the O-GlcNAcylation of PA700/S10B (the regulatory complex in 26S proteasomes) and increases the assembly of 26S proteasomes. In contrast, AMPK activation increases levels of O-GlcNAcylated PA700/S10B, likely through enhanced association of PA700 with O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT), the enzyme that catalyzes protein O-GlcNAcylation. Finally, aortas from AMPK-KO vs wild type mice exhibit elevated 26S proteasome activity in parallel with decreased PA700/S10B O-GlcNAcylation and PA700/S10B-OGT association. Taken together, we conclude that AMPK functions as a physiological suppressor of 26S proteasomes.     

Autoubiquitination of the 26S Proteasome on Rpn13 Regulates Breakdown of Ubiquitin Conjugates

Degradation rates of most proteins in eukaryotic cells are determined by their rates of ubiquitination. However, possible regulation of the proteasome's capacity to degrade ubiquitinated proteins has received little attention, although proteasome inhibitors are widely used in research and cancer treatment. We show here that mammalian 26S proteasomes have five associated ubiquitin ligases and that multiple proteasome subunits are ubiquitinated in cells, especially the ubiquitin receptor subunit, Rpn13. When proteolysis is even partially inhibited in cells or purified 26S proteasomes with various inhibitors, Rpn13 becomes extensively and selectively poly‐ubiquitinated by the proteasome‐associated ubiquitin ligase, Ube3c/Hul5. This modification also occurs in cells during heat‐shock or arsenite treatment, when poly‐ubiquitinated proteins accumulate. Rpn13 ubiquitination strongly decreases the proteasome's ability to bind and degrade ubiquitin‐conjugated proteins, but not its activity against peptide substrates. This autoinhibitory mechanism presumably evolved to prevent binding of ubiquitin conjugates to defective or stalled proteasomes, but this modification may also be useful as a biomarker indicating the presence of proteotoxic stress and reduced proteasomal capacity in cells or patients.     

C termini of proteasomal ATPases play nonequivalent roles in cellular assembly of mammalian 26 S proteasome

The 26 S proteasome comprises two multisubunit subcomplexes as follows: 20 S proteasome and PA700/19 S regulatory particle. The cellular mechanisms by which these subcomplexes assemble into 26 S proteasome and the molecular determinants that govern the assembly process are poorly defined. Here, we demonstrate the nonequivalent roles of the C termini of six AAA subunits (Rpt1-Rpt6) of PA700 in 26 S proteasome assembly in mammalian cells. The C-terminal HbYX motif (where Hb is a hydrophobic residue, Y is tyrosine, and X is any amino acid) of each of two subunits, Rpt3 and Rpt5, but not that of a third subunit Rpt2, was essential for assembly of 26 S proteasome. The C termini of none of the three non-HbYX motif Rpt subunits were essential for cellular 26 S proteasome assembly, although deletion of the last three residues of Rpt6 destabilized the 20 S-PA700 interaction. Rpt subunits defective for assembly into 26 S proteasome due to C-terminal truncations were incorporated into intact PA700. Moreover, intact PA700 accumulated as an isolated subcomplex when cellular 20 S proteasome content was reduced by RNAi. These results indicate that 20 S proteasome is not an obligatory template for assembly of PA700. Collectively, these results identify specific structural elements of two Rpt subunits required for 26 S proteasome assembly, demonstrate that PA700 can be assembled independently of the 20 S proteasome, and suggest that intact PA700 is a direct intermediate in the cellular pathway of 26 S proteasome assembly.     

Effect of high hydrostatic pressures on 20S proteasome activity.

The 20S proteasome is the catalytic core of the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway, which is implicated in many cellular processes. The cylindrical structure of this complex consists of four stacked rings of seven subunits each. The central cavity is formed by two beta catalytic subunit rings in which protein substrates are progressively degraded. The 20S proteasome is isolated in a latent form which can be activated in vitro by various chemical and physical treatments. In this study, the effects of high hydrostatic pressures on 20S proteasome enzymatic activity were investigated. When proteasomes were subjected to increasing hydrostatic pressures, a progressive loss of peptidase activities was observed between 75 and 150 MPa. The inactivation also occurred when proteasomes were pressurized in the presence of synthetic peptide substrates; this may be the result of the dissociation of the 20S particle into its subunits under pressure, as was shown by PAGE. Pressurized proteasomes also lost their caseinolytic activity. In contrast, in the presence of casein, the pressure-induced inactivation and the dissociation of the 20S particles were prevented. In addition, in comparison to that observed at atmospheric pressure, their caseinolytic activity was increased under pressure. Following depressurization, the caseinolytic activity returned to basal levels but was further enhanced following an additional pressurization treatment. Thus, the structure of the 20S particle exhibits a certain degree of plasticity. This pressure-induced activation of the 20S proteasome is discussed in relation to its hollow structure, its currently accepted proteolytic mechanism and the general effect of high pressures on the biochemical reactions and structures of biopolymers.     

Proteasome subunits are regulated and expressed in comparable concentrations as a functional cluster

The proteasome is the main proteolytic enzyme that functions in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The 26S proteasome has multi-subunit protease complexes consisting of 20S subunits composed of four seven-numbered rings with two outer rings containing α subunits and two central rings composed of β subunits, and 19S caps of 6 ATPase and 11 non-ATPase subunits; however, it is unclear how these subunits are regulated and the 26S proteasomes assembled. To verify whether each subunit’s mRNA expression is associated with the mRNA expression of other proteasome subunits, we carried out expression analysis of 34 proteasome subunits mRNA on peripheral blood from 75 subjects. The expression of proteasome subunits mRNA was comparable in each individual of the studied population and the mRNA expression has been investigated in each 20S or 19S proteasome. Our results suggest that each type of subunit is regulated by respectively common factors, and that the 20S and 19S proteasomes are regulated by different systems.     

Proteasome regulation,plant growth and stress tolerance

Plant cells contain a mixture of 26S and 20S proteasomes that mediate ubiquitin-dependent and ubiquitin-independent proteolysis, respectively. The 26S proteasome contains the 20S proteasome and one or two regulatory particles that are required for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Comparative analyses of Arabidopsis proteasome mutants revealed that a decrease in 26S proteasome biogenesis causes heat shock hypersensitivity and reduced cell division rates that are compensated by increased cell expansion. Loss of 26S proteasome function also leads to an increased 20S proteasome biogenesis, which in turn enhances the cellular capacity to degrade oxidized proteins and thus increases oxidative stress tolerance. These findings suggest the intriguing possibility that 26S and 20S proteasome activities are regulated to control plant development and stress responses. This mini-review highlights some of the recent studies on proteasome regulation in plants.Key words: proteasome, cell division, ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis, ubiquitin-independent proteolysis, stress responses     

Identification of the Xenopus 20S proteasome alpha4 subunit which is modified in the meiotic cell cycle.

The proteasomes are large, multi-subunit particles that act as the proteolytic machinery for most of the regulated intracellular protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. To investigate the regulatory mechanism for the 26S proteasome in cell-cycle events, we purified this proteasome from immature and mature oocytes, and compared its subunits. Immunoblot analysis of 26S proteasomes showed a difference in the subunit of the 20S proteasome. A monoclonal antibody, GC3beta, cross-reacted with two bands in the 26S proteasome from immature oocytes (in G2-phase); however, the upper band was absent in the 26S proteasome from mature oocytes (in M-phase). These results suggest that changes in the subunits of 26S proteasomes are involved in the regulation of the meiotic cell cycle. Here we describe the molecular cloning of one of the alpha subunits of the 20S proteasome from a Xenopus ovarian cDNA library using an anti-GC3beta monoclonal antibody. From the screening, two types of cDNA are obtained, one 856bp, the other 984bp long. The deduced amino-acid sequences comprise 247 and 248 residues, respectively. These deduced amino-acid sequences are highly homologous to those of alpha4 subunits of other vertebrates. Phosphatase treatment of 26S proteasome revealed the upper band to be a phosphorylated form of the lower band. These results suggest that a part of the alpha4 subunit of the Xenopus 20S proteasome, alpha4_xl, is phosphorylated in G2-phase and dephosphorylated in M-phase.     

Molecular biology of proteasomes

Eukaryotic proteasomes are unusually large proteins with a heterogeneous subunit composition and have been classified into two isoforms with apparently distinct sedimentation coefficients of 20S and 26S. The 20S proteasome is composed of a set of small subunits with molecular masses of 21–32 kDa. The 26S proteasome is a multi-molecular assembly, consisting of a central 20S proteasome and two terminal subsets of multiple subunits of 28–112 kDa attached to the central part in opposite orientations. The primary structures of all the subunits of mammalian and yeast 20S proteasomes have been deduced from the nucleotide sequences of cDNAs or genes isolated by recombinant DNA techniques. These genes constitute a unique multi-gene family encoding homologous polypeptides that have been conserved during evolution. In contrast, little is yet known about the terminal structures of the 26S proteasome, but the cDNA clonings of those of humans are currently in progress. In this review, I summarize available information of the structural features on eukaryotic 20S and 26S proteasomes which has been clarified by molecular-biological methods.     

Phosphorylation of ATPase subunits of the 26S proteasome

The 26S proteasome complex plays a major role in the non-lysosomal degradation of intracellular proteins. Purified 26S proteasomes give a pattern of more than 40 spots on 2D-PAGE gels. The positions of subunits have been identified by mass spectrometry of tryptic peptides and by immunoblotting with subunit-specific antipeptide antibodies. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of proteasomes immunoprecipitated from [³²P]phosphate-labelled human embryo lung L-132 cells revealed the presence of at least three major phosphorylated polypeptides among the regulatory subunits as well as the C8 and C9 components of the core 20S proteasome. Comparison with the positions of the regulatory polypeptides revealed a minor phosphorylated form to be S7 (MSS1). Antibodies against S4, S6 (TBP7) and S12 (MOV34) all cross-reacted at the position of major phosphorylated polypeptides suggesting that several of the ATPase subunits may be phosphorylated. The phosphorylation of S4 was confirmed by double immunoprecipitation experiments in which 26S proteasomes were immunoprecipitated as above and dissociated and then S4 was immunoprecipitated with subunit-specific antibodies. Antibodies against the non-ATPase subunit S10, which has been suggested by others to be phosphorylated, did not coincide with the position of a phosphorylated polypeptide. Some differences were observed in the 2D-PAGE pattern of proteasomes immunoprecipitated from cultured cells compared to purified rat liver 26S proteasomes suggesting possible differences in subunit compositions of 26S proteasomes.