不同“肠型”人群肠道菌群结构

目的为了发挥饮食对肠道菌群的有益调节作用,预防代谢性疾病的发生,特研究不同肠型人群肠道微生物组成和对饮食的代谢情况。方法随机招募志愿者(n=102),排除病患和近1个月内有抗生素药物史的志愿者。剩余志愿者(n=70)收集晨便、晨尿样本,通过Illumina HiSeq 2500测序仪对粪便样本中肠道菌群V3-V4区进行16S rDNA测序,分析肠道菌群的结构;通过高分辨质谱仪开展尿液代谢组分析。结果通过肠道菌群可将志愿者分成2种肠型:A和B,A肠型志愿者F/B值(肠道优势菌厚壁菌门与拟杆菌门丰度比例)低于B肠型。A肠型志愿者结肠拟杆菌科、韦荣球菌科、肠杆菌科、消化链球菌科的丰度高于B肠型,而瘤胃菌科、普雷沃菌科、紫单胞菌科和理研菌科的丰度低于B肠型。结论结果表明研究人群肠道中至少存在着2种肠型,在菌群结构上具有显著的差异。     

昆虫肠道微生物及其功能研究方法进展

昆虫是世界上种类最为丰富、分布最为广泛的动物类群，其肠道内栖息着复杂且多样的微生物。不同昆虫因肠道结构、肠道内环境、食性、龄期、外界环境不同，肠道内微生物组成与丰度也存在差异。肠道微生物主要通过垂直方向与水平方向在种群与个体间传播，对昆虫宿主营养代谢、生理行为、防御、解毒等诸多方面有重要影响；通过体外培养的方法可从培养基对昆虫肠道微生物进行分离，用基质辅助激光解析电离飞行时间质谱(matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, MALDI-TOF MS)及16S rRNA基因测序技术等可迅速鉴定微生物；宏基因组学、蛋白质组学、代谢组学等多种组学技术联合运用，使得肠道微生物鉴定与功能推测更为高效；体外试验、微生物补充、菌群移植、沉默微生物成员相关基因等试验方法使微生物功能验证更为准确；利用高温处理、溶菌酶处理、无菌饲养处理及抗生素处理等方式能清除肠道内的微生物群落，获得无菌昆虫用于功能验证试验，但当前使用最广的抗生素法在实际应用中仍存在一定局限；利用肠道微生物特性，通过共生菌基因工...     

昆虫肠道微生物的研究进展和应用前景

昆虫肠道的独特结构和理化性质为多种多样的微生物定殖提供了特殊环境,肠道微生物的群落组成与宿主昆虫的生长发育、代谢繁殖等生命活动密切相关。种类丰富多样、生态位分布广泛的昆虫体内含有大量特化的肠道微生物群落,经过长期协同进化形成的共生关系具有多方面无可替代的优势。这种相对稳定的共生关系对昆虫整个生命周期具有极其重要的作用,肠道微生物不仅为宿主提供重要的营养物质、协助消化食物、提高宿主防御和解毒能力,还影响宿主昆虫的寿命、发育周期以及交配与繁殖能力等。同时,昆虫肠道微生物在农业、生态、医药以及能源环保等多个学科领域也显示出了巨大的应用前景。本文就昆虫肠道微生物群落的多样性、功能和影响肠道微生物生存因素,以及应用前景等方面进行综述,讨论了昆虫肠道微生物的最新研究进展。     

常见疾病、抗生素及农药对意大利蜜蜂(Apis mellifera ligustica)肠道微生物多样性的影响研究进展

蜜蜂是对农业生产十分重要的授粉昆虫。蜜蜂肠道微生物与蜜蜂健康有密切关系,但肠道微生物也会受多种外界因素的影响。本文就蜜蜂疾病、抗生素等蜂病治疗药物、农药,以及益生菌的应用等对意大利蜜蜂工蜂肠道微生物影响的研究进行了归纳总结,并对蜜蜂与其肠道菌关系研究进行了展望。     

蜜蜂肠道微生物群落研究进展

蜜蜂是重要的农业传粉昆虫,对全球农业及生态维护有着不可替代的作用。然而近年来美国、欧洲等地出现蜂群大量消失的迹象,给农业经济带来严重威胁。近年来人们逐渐发现蜂肠道微生物与维持宿主健康之间存在着联系,蜜蜂属(Apis)和熊蜂属(Bombus)个体都带有简单、特异的肠道菌群,并且蜂肠道菌群与人类等其他动物具有诸多相似之处,例如其通过社会性接触稳定传播的特性。本综述介绍了近年来通过体外培养、高通量测序等技术对蜂肠道微生物与宿主关系的研究,特别是其简化的菌群结构、宿主特异性,及其对蜜蜂食物消化、营养供给、病虫抵抗等方面的作用,并探讨了未来基于我国特有蜂种研究的方向,及蜜蜂作为优良的社会性动物模式体系对未来人类营养健康研究的可行性。     

不同饲料饲育的家蚕幼虫肠道细菌的多样性分析

【目的】为研究饲料对不同家蚕Bombyx mori品种肠道微生物菌群的影响。【方法】以筛选到的家蚕广食性品种GS和普通品种1015为研究对象,收集从收蚁开始分别饲育桑叶(GS. m和C1015. m组)和人工饲料(GS. b组)至4龄盛时期的家蚕肠道样本,采用高通量测序的方法对其肠道微生物16S r DNA的V3-V4区进行测序分析,比较它们之间肠道微生物的差异。【结果】在门水平上,所测家蚕肠道样本的优势菌为厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)和变形杆菌门(Proteobacteria);在科水平上,所测样本主要优势菌为明串珠菌科(Leuconostocaceae)、乳酸杆菌科(Lactobacillaceae)、肠杆菌科(Enterobacteriaceae)等;在属水平上,所测样本主要的优势菌为魏斯氏属Weissella、乳酸菌属Lactobacillus、布赫纳氏菌属Buchnera、甲基杆菌属Methylobacterium、叶瘤菌属Phyllobacterium、肠球菌属Enterococcus和脆弱拟杆菌属Bacteroides等。家蚕品种GS经桑叶和人工饲料饲育后,甲基杆菌属Methylobacterium、布赫纳氏菌属Buchnera等菌属仅在桑叶饲育的GS肠道内出现,而魏斯氏菌Weissella、短芽孢杆菌属Brevibacillus等菌属只在人工饲料饲育的GS肠道内出现。同是桑叶饲育的家蚕品种GS和1015,其肠道内相同的优势菌有叶瘤菌属Phyllobacterium、脆弱拟杆菌属Bacteroides、不动细菌属Acinetobacter等。相较于广食性蚕品种GS的肠道菌群,肠球菌属Enterococcus、草螺菌属Herbaspirillum、丝硫菌属Thiothrix等菌属仅在普通蚕品种1015肠道中被检测到。GS. b组家蚕肠道细菌的物种多样性低于GS. m和C1015. m。GS. m肠道中丰度差异显著性最高的菌群为变形菌门(Proteobacteria),GS. b肠道中丰度差异显著性最高的菌群为杆菌纲(Bacilli)和乳杆菌目(Lactobacillales),而C1015. m肠道中丰度差异显著性最高的菌群为粪肠球菌属Enterococcus和肠球菌科(Enterococcaceae)。【结论】经桑叶饲育的不同蚕品种(GS和1015)的肠道微生物比人工饲料饲育的家蚕肠道微生物更趋于一致;经桑叶饲育的广食性家蚕肠道微生物物种多样性较高于经人工饲料饲育的广食性家蚕。     

昆虫肠道的宏基因组学:微生物大数据的新疆界

微生物作为自然界中普遍存在的生命体,通常以"微生物群落"的形式共存。这些物种相互协作适应环境变化的同时,也对环境产生了长期而深刻的影响。随着人类对于微生物了解的深入,微生物群落基础研究及其在健康和环境等领域的应用研究日益重要。昆虫肠道内存在种类繁多、数量庞大的微生物,一方面,这些肠道微生物种群结构的多样性与昆虫种类、龄期、消化道形式、食物的来源、环境等都息息相关。另一方面,这些菌群也对宿主的一些生理活动有着一定的影响。随着高通量测序技术、组学技术的发展,昆虫肠道宏基因组大数据挖掘和应用已经成为研究热点,极大地推动人类微生物资源利用的能力。本文概述了昆虫肠道微生物宏基因组学的发展现状和发展趋势,特别是肠道宏基因组学大数据的挖掘工具和应用,以及现阶段昆虫肠道宏基因组学的研究进展、应用、优势和瓶颈,并对今后昆虫肠道微生物组大数据研究方向进行展望。     

肠道微生物菌群分型的研究进展

人体肠道内存在着处于动态平衡中的复杂微生物群体,包含1000多种细菌和古生菌等共生微生物。它们广泛参与人体的营养、代谢和免疫等生理过程,是影响健康最重要的因素之一。同一个体不同胃肠道部位的微生物群落组成显著不同,而在不同个体的肠道微生物群落组成也存在很大差异。肠道微生物群落结构受到饮食习惯、药物干预以及生活环境等因素影响,形成了不同个体间菌群组成的差异。通过菌群测序分析和群体分型,可以将不同个体的肠道微生物群落组成分为拟杆菌、普氏菌和瘤胃球菌三种肠型。确定肠道微生物群落结构的分型,将复杂的肠道微生物系统模式化,有利于对大样本肠道微生物菌群进行分析,更好地指导相关疾病的诊断和治疗。本文综述了肠道微生物的分型和相关影响因素的进展。     

不同养殖场林麝肠道微生物组成和功能的差异

肠道疾病是养殖林麝(Moschus berezovskii)常见疾病。动物肠道微生物伴随宿主进化并与胃肠道构成了复杂的微生态系统。为探究不同饲养环境对圈养林麝肠道微生物组成和功能的影响,本研究对采自国内5个不同养殖场的215份粪便样品进行了16S rRNA基因高通量测序,对比分析不同养殖场林麝肠道微生物组成、多样性和功能的差异。结果显示,厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门是未喂食复合益生菌的祁连县养殖场林麝肠道菌群的绝对优势菌门,而喂食复合益生菌的甘肃两当县和陕西凤县的4家养殖场林麝肠道菌群的绝对优势菌门为厚壁菌门和变形菌门。不同养殖场林麝肠道菌群组成、优势菌门、优势菌属、潜在致病菌、代谢及疾病相关功能均有显著差异。祁连县养殖场林麝肠道微生物的α多样性和疾病相关功能表达量显著低于其他养殖场,并以肠型2为主,其主导菌为厚壁菌门、UCG-005和拟杆菌属;两当县和凤县的4家养殖场林麝肠道菌群潜在致病菌相对丰度较低。本研究推测食物组成差异可能是导致不同养殖场林麝肠道微生物差异的主要因素,复合益生菌的使用可能是导致α多样性和潜在致病菌下降的重要因素。该结果可为林麝的人工养殖和有效管理提供科学依据,也对人工饲养...     

海水混养池塘虾蛤肠道与养殖环境的微生物多样性

【背景】海水混养池塘环境微生物以及动物肠道微生物的群落结构已有研究,但对混养环境中多品种动物肠道与环境微生物群落的关系尚未见报道。【目的】研究海水虾蛤混养环境中微生物多样性以及与养殖动物健康之间的关系。【方法】采用Illumina高通量测序技术测定冬季莆田市北江养殖区2个混养池塘中水体、底泥以及虾蛤肠道的菌群结构。【结果】同一池塘水体与底泥之间、不同池塘水体或底泥之间的微生物结构存在一定的差异;同一养殖区2个混养池塘虾与蛤肠道微生物结构之间具有极高的相似性,与养殖环境存在显著的差异。微生物多样性和丰富度差异很大,表现出底泥水体肠道;虾蛤肠道微生物以厚壁细菌和γ-变形细菌为主;池塘水体以放线菌、α-变形细菌以及拟杆菌为主,底泥以γ-变形细菌和δ-变形细菌为主。养殖动物肠道微生物主要优势种为乳球菌属和假单胞菌属,池塘环境内存在较高丰度的黄杆菌类潜在致病菌,而在虾和蛤的肠道中基本未检出。2个池塘底泥硫还原细菌含量较高,增加了底质产生硫化氢等有害物质的风险。【结论】比较混养池塘中水体、底泥以及虾蛤肠道三者之间微生物群落结构的差异,揭示虾、贝混养模式微生物与养殖环境的关系,为池塘养殖虾、贝疾病防治和混养结构的优化提供参考。     

A simple and distinctive microbiota associated with honey bees and bumble bees

Specialized relationships with bacteria often allow animals to exploit a new diet by providing a novel set of metabolic capabilities. Bees are a monophyletic group of Hymenoptera that transitioned to a completely herbivorous diet from the carnivorous diet of their wasp ancestors. Recent culture-independent studies suggest that a set of distinctive bacterial species inhabits the gut of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Here we survey the gut microbiotae of diverse bee and wasp species to test whether acquisition of these bacteria was associated with the transition to herbivory in bees generally. We found that most bee species lack phylotypes that are the same or similar to those typical of A. mellifera, rejecting the hypothesis that this dietary transition was symbiont-dependent. The most common bacteria in solitary bee species are a widespread phylotype of Burkholderia and the pervasive insect associate, Wolbachia. In contrast, several social representatives of corbiculate bees do possess distinctive bacterial phylotypes. Samples of A. mellifera harboured the same microbiota as in previous surveys, and closely related bacterial phylotypes were identified in two Asian honey bees (Apis andreniformis and Apis dorsata) and several bumble bee (Bombus) species. Potentially, the sociality of Apis and Bombus species facilitates symbiont transmission and thus is key to the maintenance of a more consistent gut microbiota. Phylogenetic analyses provide a more refined taxonomic placement of the A. mellifera symbionts.     

Characterization of the active microbiotas associated with honey bees reveals healthier and broader communities when colonies are genetically diverse

Recent losses of honey bee colonies have led to increased interest in the microbial communities that are associated with these important pollinators. A critical function that bacteria perform for their honey bee hosts, but one that is poorly understood, is the transformation of worker-collected pollen into bee bread, a nutritious food product that can be stored for long periods in colonies. We used 16S rRNA pyrosequencing to comprehensively characterize in genetically diverse and genetically uniform colonies the active bacterial communities that are found on honey bees, in their digestive tracts, and in bee bread. This method provided insights that have not been revealed by past studies into the content and benefits of honey bee-associated microbial communities. Colony microbiotas differed substantially between sampling environments and were dominated by several anaerobic bacterial genera never before associated with honey bees, but renowned for their use by humans to ferment food. Colonies with genetically diverse populations of workers, a result of the highly promiscuous mating behavior of queens, benefited from greater microbial diversity, reduced pathogen loads, and increased abundance of putatively helpful bacteria, particularly species from the potentially probiotic genus Bifidobacterium. Across all colonies, Bifidobacterium activity was negatively correlated with the activity of genera that include pathogenic microbes; this relationship suggests a possible target for understanding whether microbes provide protective benefits to honey bees. Within-colony diversity shapes microbiotas associated with honey bees in ways that may have important repercussions for colony function and health. Our findings illuminate the importance of honey bee-bacteria symbioses and examine their intersection with nutrition, pathogen load, and genetic diversity, factors that are considered key to understanding honey bee decline.     

Establishment of characteristic gut bacteria during development of the honeybee worker

Previous surveys have shown that adult honeybee (Apis mellifera) workers harbor a characteristic gut microbiota that may play a significant role in bee health. For three major phylotypes within this microbiota, we have characterized distributions and abundances across the life cycle and among gut organs. These distinctive phylotypes, called Beta, Firm-5, and Gamma-1 (BFG), were assayed using quantitative PCR, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) microscopy, and the experimental manipulation of inoculation routes within developing bees. Adult workers (9 to 30 days posteclosion) contained a large BFG microbiota with a characteristic distribution among gut organs. The crop and midgut were nearly devoid of these phylotypes, while the ileum and rectum together contained more than 95% of the total BFG microbiota. The ileum contained a stratified community in which the Beta and Gamma-1 phylotypes dominated, filling the longitudinal folds of this organ. Deep sequencing of 16S rRNA genes showed clear differences among communities in midgut, ileum, and rectum. In contrast with older workers, larvae and newly emerged workers contain few or no bacteria, and their major food source, bee bread, lacks most characteristic phylotypes. In experiments aimed at determining the route of inoculation, newly emerged workers (NEWs) sometimes acquired the typical phylotypes through contact with older workers, contact with the hive, and emergence from the brood cell; however, transmission was patchy in these assays. Our results outline a colonization pattern for the characteristic phylotypes through A. mellifera ontogeny. We propose the names "Candidatus Snodgrassella alvi" and "Candidatus Gilliamella apicola" for the Beta and Gamma-1 phylotypes, respectively.     

Paratransgenesis: an approach to improve colony health and molecular insight in honey bees (Apis mellifera)?

The honey bee (Apis mellifera) is highly valued as a commercial crop pollinator and a model animal in research. Over the past several years, governments, beekeepers, and the general public in the United States and Europe have become concerned by increased losses of honey bee colonies, calling for more research on how to keep colonies healthy while still employing them extensively in agriculture. The honey bee, like virtually all multicellular organisms, has a mutually beneficial relationship with specific microbes. The microbiota of the gut can contribute essential nutrients and vitamins and prevent colonization by non-indigenous and potentially harmful species. The gut microbiota is also of interest as a resource for paratransgenesis; a Trojan horse strategy based on genetically modified symbiotic microbes that express effector molecules antagonizing development or transmission of pathogens. Paratransgenesis was originally engineered to combat human diseases and agricultural pests that are vectored by insects. We suggest an alternative use, as a method to promote health of honey bees and to expand the molecular toolbox for research on this beneficial social insect. The honey bees' gut microbiota contains lactic acid bacteria including the genus Lactobacillus that has paratransgenic potential. We present a strategy for transforming one Lactobacillus species, L. kunkeei, for use as a vector to promote health of honey bees and functional genetic research.     

Gut microbiota composition is associated with environmental landscape in honey bees

There is growing recognition that the gut microbial community regulates a wide variety of important functions in its animal hosts, including host health. However, the complex interactions between gut microbes and environment are still unclear. Honey bees are ecologically and economically important pollinators that host a core gut microbial community that is thought to be constant across populations. Here, we examined whether the composition of the gut microbial community of honey bees is affected by the environmental landscape the bees are exposed to. We placed honey bee colonies reared under identical conditions in two main landscape types for 6 weeks: either oilseed rape farmland or agricultural farmland distant to fields of flowering oilseed rape. The gut bacterial communities of adult bees from the colonies were then characterized and compared based on amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. While previous studies have delineated a characteristic core set of bacteria inhabiting the honey bee gut, our results suggest that the broad environment that bees are exposed to has some influence on the relative abundance of some members of that microbial community. This includes known dominant taxa thought to have functions in nutrition and health. Our results provide evidence for an influence of landscape exposure on honey bee microbial community and highlight the potential effect of exposure to different environmental parameters, such as forage type and neonicotinoid pesticides, on key honey bee gut bacteria. This work emphasizes the complexity of the relationship between the host, its gut bacteria, and the environment and identifies target microbial taxa for functional analyses.     

Distinctive gut microbiota of honey bees assessed using deep sampling from individual worker bees

Surveys of 16S rDNA sequences from the honey bee, Apis mellifera, have revealed the presence of eight distinctive bacterial phylotypes in intestinal tracts of adult worker bees. Because previous studies have been limited to relatively few sequences from samples pooled from multiple hosts, the extent of variation in this microbiota among individuals within and between colonies and locations has been unclear. We surveyed the gut microbiota of 40 individual workers from two sites, Arizona and Maryland USA, sampling four colonies per site. Universal primers were used to amplify regions of 16S ribosomal RNA genes, and amplicons were sequenced using 454 pyrotag methods, enabling analysis of about 330,000 bacterial reads. Over 99% of these sequences belonged to clusters for which the first blastn hits in GenBank were members of the known bee phylotypes. Four phylotypes, one within Gammaproteobacteria (corresponding to "Candidatus Gilliamella apicola") one within Betaproteobacteria ("Candidatus Snodgrassella alvi"), and two within Lactobacillus, were present in every bee, though their frequencies varied. The same typical bacterial phylotypes were present in all colonies and at both sites. Community profiles differed significantly among colonies and between sites, mostly due to the presence in some Arizona colonies of two species of Enterobacteriaceae not retrieved previously from bees. Analysis of Sanger sequences of rRNA of the Snodgrassella and Gilliamella phylotypes revealed that single bees contain numerous distinct strains of each phylotype. Strains showed some differentiation between localities, especially for the Snodgrassella phylotype.     

Genomic changes underlying host specialization in the bee gut symbiont Lactobacillus Firm5

Bacteria that engage in long‐standing associations with particular hosts are expected to evolve host‐specific adaptations that limit their capacity to thrive in other environments. Consistent with this, many gut symbionts seem to have a limited host range, based on community profiling and phylogenomics. However, few studies have experimentally investigated host specialization of gut symbionts and the underlying mechanisms have largely remained elusive. Here, we studied host specialization of a dominant gut symbiont of social bees, Lactobacillus Firm5. We show that Firm5 strains isolated from honey bees and bumble bees separate into deep‐branching host‐specific phylogenetic lineages. Despite their divergent evolution, colonization experiments show that bumble bee strains are capable of colonizing the honey bee gut. However, they were less successful than honey bee strains, and competition with honey bee strains completely abolished their colonization. In contrast, honey bee strains of divergent phylogenetic lineages were able to coexist within individual bees. This suggests that both host selection and interbacterial competition play important roles in host specialization. Using comparative genomics of 27 Firm5 isolates, we found that the genomes of honey bee strains harbour more carbohydrate‐related functions than bumble bee strains, possibly providing a competitive advantage in the honey bee gut. Remarkably, most of the genes encoding carbohydrate‐related functions were not conserved among the honey bee strains, which suggests that honey bees can support a metabolically more diverse community of Firm5 strains than bumble bees. These findings advance our understanding of the genomic changes underlying host specialization.     

Diversity and phylotype consistency of bacteria in the guts of three bee species (Apoidea) at an oilseed rape field

The gut of insects may harbour one of the largest reservoirs of a yet unexplored microbial diversity. To understand how specific insects select for their own bacterial communities, the structural diversity and variability of bacteria found in the gut of different bee species was analysed. For three successive years, adults and larvae of Apis mellifera ssp. carnica (honey bee), and Bombus terrestris (bumble bee), as well as larvae of Osmia bicornis (red mason bee) were collected at a flowering oilseed rape field. Total DNA was extracted from gut material and the bacterial diversity was analysed, independent of cultivation, by genetic profiling with single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified partial 16S rRNA genes. The SSCP profiles were specific for all bee species and for larvae and adults. Qualitative and quantitative differences were found in the bacterial community structure of larvae and adults of A. mellifera, but differences in B. terrestris were mainly quantitative. Sequencing of the PCR products revealed a dominance of Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes in all bee species. Single-strand conformation polymorphism profiles suggested a higher abundance and diversity of lactobacilli in adults of A. mellifera than in larvae. Further phylogenetic analyses indicated common bacterial phylotypes for all three bee species, e.g. those related to Simonsiella, Serratia, and Lactobacillus. Clades related to Delftia acidovorans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Lactobacillus intestinalis only contained sequences from larvae. Several of the bee-specific clusters also contained identical or highly similar sequences from bacteria detected in other A. mellifera subspecies from South Africa, suggesting the existence of cosmopolitan gut bacteria in bees.     

Division of Labor Associated with Brood Rearing in the Honey Bee: How Does It Translate to Colony Fitness?

Division of labor is a striking feature observed in honey bees and many other social insects. Division of labor has been claimed to benefit fitness. In honey bees, the adult work force may be viewed as divided between non-foraging hive bees that rear brood and maintain the nest, and foragers that collect food outside the nest. Honey bee brood pheromone is a larval pheromone that serves as an excellent empirical tool to manipulate foraging behaviors and thus division of labor in the honey bee. Here we use two different doses of brood pheromone to alter the foraging stimulus environment, thus changing demographics of colony division of labor, to demonstrate how division of labor associated with brood rearing affects colony growth rate. We examine the effects of these different doses of brood pheromone on individual foraging ontogeny and specialization, colony level foraging behavior, and individual glandular protein synthesis. Low brood pheromone treatment colonies exhibited significantly higher foraging population, decreased age of first foraging and greater foraging effort, resulting in greater colony growth compared to other treatments. This study demonstrates how division of labor associated with brood rearing affects honey bee colony growth rate, a token of fitness.