Response of prepubertal Bos taurus and Bos indicus x Bos taurus heifers to melengestrol acetate with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone

The effectiveness of treatments to induce estrus in prepubertal beef heifers was evaluated. Angus x Hereford (n = 148) and Brahman x Hereford (n = 148) heifers were sorted after weaning by body weight into light and heavy weight blocks. Heifers were assigned to diets, calculated to reach a target weight of 55% or 65% of their projected mature weight by the start of breeding. Cyclicity was determined after a 160-d observation period and from concentrations of progesterone in serum determined 10 d before and on the day that treatments began to induce puberty. The remaining nonpubertal heifers, with concentrations of progesterone in serum of less than 1 ng/ml (0 or 10 d before treatment), were assigned randomly within breed and nutrition group to either a melengestrol acetate + saline (MGA+S) or MGA + gonadotropin-releasing hormone (MGA+GnRH) treatment. Prepubertal Angus x Hereford heifers (n = 11) and Brahman x Hereford heifers (n = 49) were fed 0.5 mg MGA for 7 d. Forty-eight hours after MGA, heifers were injected with 500 ug s.c. GnRH or 5 ml of saline. Blood samples were collected from all prepubertal heifers every 3 d after GnRH or saline for 30 d. There was no difference between treatments in the proportion of heifers that exhibited estrus by Day 7 after treatment. However, a larger (P<0.05) proportion of MGA+S-treated heifers exhibited estrus within 14 d after treatment than MGA+GnRH-treated heifers (87 vs 63%). Among heifers that exhibited estrus during that time period, the proportion with increased progesterone was higher (P<0.10) for the MGA+GnRH group than for the MGA+S group (71 vs 41%, Day 7; 79 vs 54%, Day 14). There was no difference in conception rate at first service between treatment groups. Thirty-seven and 53%, respectively, of the MGA+S and MGA+GnRH-treated heifers had short estrous cycles after treatment, and 44 and 50%, respectively, of those short cycles were repeated. Pregnancy rates at the end of 45 d were numerically higher for MGA+S heifers than for MGA+GnRH treated counterparts (63 vs 53%).     

Use of short-term progestin treatment to resynchronize the second estrus following synchronized breeding in beef heifers

Two trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of short-term progestin administration to resynchronize the second estrus after artificial insemination in yearling beef heifers. In Trial 1 crossbred yearling heifers (n = 208) were synchronized with Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) and artificially inseminated (AI) between 48 and 54 h following implant removal. Implant removal is defined as Day 1. Following AI, the heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups. Group 1 heifers were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA) daily from Day 17 to 21 at a rate of 0.5 mg/head, while Group 2 control received no exogenous progestin during this period. Synchrony of estrus was defined as the 3-d period in which the highest number of heifers expressed behavioral estrus in each group. There was no difference (P < 0.05) in the pregnancy rate during the second estrus due to MGA supplementation. More MGA-treated heifers (P < 0.01) expressed estrus in a 3-d period than the controls. In Trial 2, yearling heifers (n = 108) were synchronized with 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) (second PGF(2alpha) injection is designated as Day 1) administered 14 d apart with AI 12 h after the onset of behavioral estrus. The heifers were then randomly assigned to 1 of the following 3 treatment groups after initial AI: 1) MGA fed at 0.5 mg/head daily from Days 17 to 21; 2) norgestomet administered in 6.0-mg implants from Days 17 to 21; 3) untreated control heifers. Blood samples were collected on Day 21 and analyzed for progesterone (P(4)). Elevated P(4) (> 1 ng/ml) on Day 21 indicated pregnancy to the first insemination. Synchrony among the 3 groups of heifers was similar (P > 0.10); however, the second estrus was less (P < 0.05) variable in the MGA and norgestomet treated heifers. During the resynchronized second estrus, conception rates were not affected by progestin treatment (MGA 40%, norgestomet 64%, and control 62%; P > 0.10). However, a proportion of heifers treated MGA 10% 4 36 and norgestomet 3% 1 36 expressed behavioral estrus during second estrus even though they were diagnosed as pregnant from first service by elevated P(4) levels on Day 21. We conclude that short-term use of progestin from Days 17 to 21 following AI causes closer synchrony of estrus; however, inseminating pregnant heifers that exhibit behavioral estrus may cause abortion.     

Estrus synchronization in cattle using estradiol, melengestrol acetate and PGF

In Experiment 1, all cattle were fed MGA (0.5 mg/head/d) for 7 d (designated Days 0 to 6) and given PGF on Day 6. One-half were administered estradiol valerate (EV; 5 mg, im) on Day 0. At Location 1, a higher proportion (P < 0.005) of EV-treated heifers were detected in estrus and bred by AI between Days 7 and 13 than control heifers not receiving EV (27 of 33 versus 15 of 32), but the number of pregnancies (12 vs 10) was not significantly different. Eighty-three of 104 EV-treated and 89 of 106 control cows were inseminated, resulting in 50 and 45 pregnancies, respectively (not significant). At Location 2, cattle were similarly treated and exposed to bulls on Days 7 to 49. Fall pregnancy rate was higher (P < 0.015) for EV-treated than control heifers (44 of 48 vs 33 of 46), but was not significantly different for cows (22 of 26 vs 19 of 23). In Experiment 2, estradiol 17beta (E17beta; 5 mg, im) and progesterone (100 mg, im) were administered on Day 0 (instead of EV). In a third group (designated the PGF group), cattle were bred on Days 0 to 6, and PGF was administered on Day 6 to those not yet bred. For 213 cows, the percentage pregnant to a synchronized estrus was greater in the PGF group (72%) than in either the control group treated with MGA (49%; P = 0.005) or the group receiving MGA and E17beta (54%; P < 0.025). Fall pregnancy rates were 91, 89, and 96% for the 213 cows (not significant) and 89, 93, and 98% for 131 heifers (not significant) in the PGF, MGA and E17beta groups, respectively. In cattle without a functional CL, the average diameter of the largest follicle at Day 6 was 1 to 2 mm smaller in the E17beta + MGA group than in the MGA group (difference significant only in cows at Location 1). Combined for both locations, the synchronized pregnancy rate in heifers without a functional CL on Day 6 was higher (P < 0.05) in the E17beta + MGA group than in the MGA group (11 of 21, 52% versus 4 of 20, 20%). Estrogen treatment caused regression of ovarian follicles with emergence of a new follicular wave. Including estrogen in an estrus synchronization program utilizing MGA and PGF significantly increased fall pregnancy rate in heifers (at 1 location) and the synchronized pregnancy rate of heifers without a functional CL at the time of PGF treatment (combined for both locations).     

Synchronization of estrus in virgin beef heifers using melengestrol acetate and PGF2alpha: an efficacy comparison of cloprostenol and dinoprost tromethamine

This study compared the efficacy of two sources of PGF2alpha on the reproductive performance of virgin beef heifers, after synchronization of estrus using melengestrol acetate (MGA) and PGF2alpha. Angus-based heifers (n = 1002) in five herds were fed 0.5 mg per head per day of MGA for 14 days. Nineteen days after the last day of MGA feeding, heifers were randomly assigned to receive (i.m.) either 0.5 mg cloprostenol (n = 504; Estrumate, E) or 25 mg dinoprost tromethamine (n = 498; Lutalyse, L) as a source of exogenous PGF2alpha. Heifers were observed twice daily for 5 days for signs of estrus and artificially inseminated 8-12 h later, except in herd A, wherein animals not detected in estrus by 80 h after PGF2alpha were mass-mated and no longer monitored for signs of estrus. Estrumate and Lutalyse were equally (P > 0.1) effective among all response variables evaluated, including estrus response (E, 89% and L, 86%), conception rate (E, 67% and L, 67%), and synchronized pregnancy rate (E, 61% and L, 57%). Synchrony of estrus was not affected (P > 0.1) by PGF2alpha source, and peak estrus response occurred 60 h post-PGF for both treatments. Conception rate to timed insemination was not different (P > 0.1) among Estrumate- and Lutalyse-treated heifers within herd A (14%, 4/28 and 7%, 2/29, respectively). Herd had a significant (P < 0.05) effect on all indicators of reproductive performance. Conception rates within herds A and D were influenced by technician (P < 0.05), however, this effect was balanced across treatments and no treatment by technician interaction was detected. In conclusion, when administered 19 days after a 14-day MGA feeding period, cloprostenol and dinoprost tromethamine are equally efficacious for synchronous induction of a fertile estrus in virgin beef heifers.     

Estrus synchronization in beef heifers with progestin-based protocols. I. Differences in response based on pubertal status at the initiation of treatment

Two progestin-based protocols for estrus synchronization in replacement beef heifers were compared on the basis of estrous response, interval to and synchrony of estrus, and pregnancy rate. The objective was to determine, whether addition of GnRH to a melengestrol acetate (MGA)-prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) estrus synchronization protocol would improve synchrony of estrus without compromising fertility in yearling beef heifers. Heifers at two locations (Location 1, n = 60 and Location 2, n = 64) were assigned randomly to one of two treatments by breed and pubertal status. Heifers were defined as, pubertal when concentrations of progesterone in serum were elevated (> or = 1 ng/mL) in either one of two samples obtained 10 and 1 day prior to treatment initiation. Prior to MGA administration, 18/60 (30%) and 36/64 (56%) of the heifers at Locations 1 and 2, respectively, were pubertal. Heifers in both treatments were fed MGA (0.5 mg/head/day in 1.8 kg/head/day supplement) for 14 days followed by 25 mg of PGF2alpha i.m. (MGA-PGF2alpha) 19 days after MGA withdrawal (Day 33 of treatment). One-half of the heifers at each location received 100 microg of GnRH i.m. 12 days after MGA withdrawal (Day 26 of treatment; MGA Select). The control group received only MGA-PGF2alpha. Heifers were observed for signs of behavioral estrus continuously during daylight hours for 7 days beginning on the day PGF2alpha was administered. Heifers were inseminated 12 h after observed estrus. There was a treatment by location by pubertal status interaction (P < 0.05) for interval to estrus. Compared to the respective control treatment at each location, prepubertal heifers assigned to the MGA Select protocol at Location 1 had longer intervals to estrus, whereas at Location 2, prepubertal heifers assigned to the MGA-PGF2alpha protocol had longer intervals to estrus. The higher number of pubertal heifers at Location 2 was associated with a reduced variance in the interval to estrus among MGA Select treated heifers. Total estrous response and synchronized conception rates were similar between treatments at both locations. These data suggest that addition of GnRH to the MGA-PGF2alpha protocol may improve synchrony of estrus, however, the degree of synchrony may be influenced by pubertal status of heifers at the time treatments are imposed. Further studies are needed to define production systems in which the MGA Select protocol is warranted for use in beef heifers.     

Evaluation of a melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F(2)alpha system for the synchronization of estrus in beef heifers

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of feeding melengestrol acetate (MGA) for 14 days and administering prostaglandin F(2)alpha (PGF) 17 days after MGA to synchronize or induce estrus in yearling beef heifers. The study involved 56 Angus (n = 19), Hereford (n = 15) and Simmental (n = 22) heifers that were assigned by breed and pubertal status to either MGA+PGF or to control groups. Heifers in the synchronized group were fed 0.5 mg MGA per head per day for 14 days from a grain carrier and were injected with 25 mg, i.m. PGF 17 days after the last daily feeding of MGA. Control heifers were fed from a grain carrier without MGA and were not treated with PGF. Heifers were classified as pubertal when concentrations of progesterono in the serum exceeded 1 ng/ml in 1 of 2 samples collected prior to the initiation of treatments. Blood samples were collected 7 days before and on the day that treatment with MGA or carrier began and 7 days before and on the day that PGF was administered. Progesterone concentrations in the serum were elevated ( > 1 ng/ml) in 61% (17 28 ) of the MGA+PGF-treated heifers and in 61% (17 28 ) of the control heifers prior to feeding MGA. However, concentrations of progesterone in the serum at the time PGF was administered differed (P<0.05) between MGA+PGF and control groups. Concentrations of progesterone in the serum exceeded 1 ng/ml in 100% (28 28 ) of the MGA+PGF-treated heifers and in 71% (20 28 ) of control heifers at the time PGF was administered (P<0.05). All heifers were inseminated 12 hours after the first detected estrus. Twenty-two of 28 (79%) of the MGA+PGF-treated heifers exhibited estrus within 6 days after PGF compared with 9 of 28 (32%) of control heifers (P<0.05). The conception rate at first service did not differ between MGA+PGF and control groups (64% and 67%, respectively). Synchronized pregnancy rates were higher (P<0.05) for MGA+PGF-treated heifers than for control heifers (14 28 , 50% vs 6 28 , 21%). Increased concentrations of progesterone in serum at the time PGF was administered and higher pregnancy rates during the synchronized period among MGA+PGF-treated heifers demonstrate the efficacy of this treatment for use in estrus synchronization. Moreover, this treatment may have a potential effect on inducing puberty in breeding age heifers.     

Evaluation of two progestogen-based estrous synchronization protocols in yearling heifers of Bos indicus × Bos taurus breeding

Yearling Bos indicus × Bos taurus heifers (n = 410) from three locations, were synchronized with either the Select Synch/CIDR+timed-AI (SSC+TAI) or 7-11+timed-AI (7-11+TAI) treatments. On Day 0 of the experiment, within each location, heifers were equally distributed to treatments by reproductive tract score (RTS; Scale 1-5: 1 = immature, 5 = estrous cycling) and body condition score. The 7-11+TAI treatment consisted of melengestrol acetate (0.5 mg/head/d) from Days 0 to 7, with PGF_2α (25 mg im) on Day 7, GnRH (100 μg im) on Day 11, and PGF_2α (25 mg im) on Day 18. The SSC+TAI heifers received the same carrier supplement (without MGA) from Days 0 to 7, and on Day 11 they were given 100 μg GnRH and an intravaginal CIDR (containing 1.38 g progesterone). The CIDR were removed on Day 18, concurrent with 25 mg PGF_2α im For both treatments, estrus was visually detected for 1 h twice daily (0700 and 1600 h) for 72 h after PGF_2α, with AI done 6 to 12 h after a detected estrus. Non-responders were timed-AI and received GnRH (100 μg im) 72 to 76 h post PGF_2α. The 7-11+TAI heifers had a greater (P < 0.05) estrous response (55.2 vs 41.9%), conception rate (47.0 vs 31.3%), and synchronized pregnancy rate (33.5 vs 24.8%) compared to SSC+TAI heifers, respectively. Heifers exhibiting estrus at 60 h (61.7%) had a greater (P < 0.05) conception rate compared to heifers that exhibited estrus at ≤ 36 (35.3%), 48 (31.6%), and 72 h (36.2%), which were similar (P > 0.05) to each other. As RTS increased from ≤ 2 to ≥ 3, estrous response, conception rate, synchronized pregnancy rate, and 30 d pregnancy rate all increased (P < 0.05), irrespective of synchronization treatment. In conclusion, the 7-11+TAI treatment yielded greater synchronized pregnancy rates compared to SSC+TAI treatment in yearling Bos indicus × Bos taurus heifers.     

Breeding ewes out-of-season using melengestrol acetate, one injection of progesterone, or a controlled internal drug releasing device

A series of studies was designed to identify methods of improving out-of-season breeding success in ewes. In Experiment 1, 190 mature ewes were assigned to receive in April, either: (A) a control ration of 0.3 kg corn twice daily for 8 d before ram introduction (control ewes n=49), (B) the control ration containing 0.125 mg of melengestrol acetate (MGA) in 0.3 kg corn (MGA8a ewes n=46), (C) the control ration or 7.5 d followed by 1 feeding of 0.5 mg MGA in 0.3 kg corn (MGA1 ewes n=48), or (D) the control ration plus a 20 mg i.m. injection of progesterone on D 8 (P ewes n=47). Ewes were exposed to rams for 21 d. A greater percentage of MGA8a and P ewes lambed than did control ewes (P < 0.04). The lambing rate was greatest among MGA8a (P < 0.02 vs. control), intermediate among P ewes (P < 0.19 vs. control) and least among MGA1 and control ewes (P > 0.79). In Experiment 2, 70 mature ewes were assigned to receive in June, either: (A) a control ration of 0.3 kg of corn twice daily for 8 d before to ram introduction (control ewes n=25), (B) the control ration containing 0.125 mg of MGA per 0.3 kg corn (MGA8b ewes n=21), or (C) the control ration and simultaneous treatment of ewes with a progesterone-containing controlled internal-drug releasing device (CIDR ewes n=24). Ewes were exposed to rams for 21 d. Both CIDR and MGA8b ewes exhibited estrus earlier than did control ewes (P < 0.01). The CIDR ewes exhibited estrus earlier than did the MGA8b ewes (P < 0.05). A greater percentage of ewes treated with CIDR or MGA8b lambed than did control ewes (P < 0.01), with more CIDR ewes lambing than MGA8b ewes (P < 0.01). The lambing rate was greater in CIDR ewes than in control ewes (P < 0.04). These data provide evidence that several options exist to improve pregnancy success in ewes bred out of season and that success varies with method of treatment.     

Resynchronization of previously timed-inseminated beef heifers with progestins

The objective was to determine the efficacy of a previously used CIDR or melengestrol acetate (MGA; 0.5mg/head/day) for resynchronization of estrus in beef heifers not pregnant to timed-AI (TAI). In three experiments and a field trial, heifers were reinseminated 6-12 h after first detection of estrus. Pregnancy diagnosis was done from approximately 25-43 days after either TAI or reinsemination. In Experiment 1, 79 heifers received a once-used CIDR from 13 to 20 days after TAI and 80 heifers were untreated controls. For these two groups, there were 34 and 35 heifers, respectively, not pregnant to TAI; median +/- S.E. intervals from TAI to onset of estrus were 22 +/- 0.2 days versus 20 +/- 0.6 days (P < 0.001); estrus rates were 70.6% versus 85.7% (P = 0.1); conception rates were 62.5% versus 76.7% (P < 0.3); and pregnancy rates were 44.1% versus 65.7% (P = 0.07), for CIDR and untreated (control) groups, respectively. In Experiment 2, heifers (n = 651) were TAI (Day 0) and 13 days later randomly assigned to one of seven groups (n = 93 per group) to receive a once-used CIDR (three groups; Days 13-20), MGA (three groups; Days 13-19), or no treatment (control group). Groups given a CIDR or MGA also received: no further treatment (CIDR or MGA alone); 1.5mg estradiol-17beta (E-17beta) and 50 mg progesterone (P4) in 2 mL canola oil on Day 13; or E-17beta and P4 on Day 13 and 0.5 mg E-17beta on Day 21 (24 h after CIDR removal or 48 h after the last feeding of MGA). Pregnancy rate to TAI was lowest (P < 0.05) for the group given a CIDR plus E-17beta and P4 on Day 13 and E-17beta on Day 21. Variability in return to estrus was greater (P < 0.001) in the control and MGA groups than in CIDR groups. Conception and pregnancy rates in heifers given a CIDR (65.1 and 61.4%) were higher (P<0.01) than those fed MGA (49.6 and 40.4%), but not different from controls (62.2 and 54.9%, respectively). In Experiment 3, 616 heifers received a once- or twice-used CIDR for 7 days, beginning 13+/-1 days after TAI, with or without a concurrent injection of 150 mg of P4 (2 x 2 factorial design). Pregnancy rate to TAI was 47.2%. In heifers that returned to estrus, there was no significant difference between a once- or twice-used CIDR for rates of estrus (68.8%, P < 0.3), conception (65.9%, P < 0.6) and pregnancy (45.3%, P < 0.8). Injecting progesterone at CIDR insertion increased the median interval from CIDR removal to onset of estrus (P < 0.05) and reduced rates of estrus (63.8% versus 73.8%, P<0.05), conception (60.5% versus 70.6%, P = 0.1) and pregnancy (38.6% versus 52.2%, P < 0.02). In a field trial, 983 heifers received a once-used CIDR for 7 days, beginning 13 +/- 1 days after TAI. Pregnancy rate to TAI was 55.2%. The median (and mode) of the interval from CIDR removal to estrus was 2.5 days. Estrus, conception and pregnancy rates were 78.2, 70.3 and 55.0% (overall pregnancy rate to TAI and rebreeding, 78.7%). In summary, a once- or twice-used CIDR for 7 days, starting 13 +/- 1 days after TAI resulted in the majority of nonpregnant heifers detected in estrus over a 4-day interval, with acceptable conception rates; however, injecting progesterone at CIDR insertion significantly reduced both estrus and pregnancy rates, and estradiol treatment after CIDR removal was associated with a decreased pregnancy rate to TAI. Fertility was higher in heifers resynchronized with a once-used CIDR than with MGA.     

Change in morphology of corpora lutea, central luteal cavities and steroid secretion patterns of postpartum suckled beef cows after melengestrol acetate with or without prostaglandin F2alpha

Change in morphology of the corpus luteum (CL) and patterns of progesterone and estradiol secretion after treatment with melengestrol acetate (MGA) were monitored in postpartum beef cows. Twenty Angus cows were randomly assigned to MGA or MGA + prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF) treatments. All cows were fed 0.5 mg of MGA per cow per day for 14 d. The MGA-treated cows (n = 10) were allowed to return to estrus spontaneously at the second estrus after withdrawal of MGA from the feed. The MGA + PGF-treated cows (n = 10) received an injection containing 25 mg of PGF(2alpha) 17 d after the last feeding of MGA. Cycle 1 was defined as the first luteal phase after MGA feeding and Cycle 2 represented the subsequent cycle or luteal phase after PGF. Blood sampling and transrectal ultrasonography of the ovaries was done daily through the completion of 2 estrous cycles upon removal of MGA from the feed. Blood samples were analyzed for plasma progesterone and estradiol concentrations. Area of CL and fluid-filled cavities within each CL were determined by ultrasonography. Concentrations of progesterone and area of CL were similar between cycles and treatments. Estradiol concentrations were higher (P < 0.05) in Cycle 2 than in Cycle 1. Fluid-filled cavities were larger (P < 0.001) in Cycle 1 than in Cycle 2 for both mid-luteal (Days 5 to 9) and late-luteal (Days 10 to 14) phases. Multiple CL (2 or more during 1 cycle) were observed in 5 cows. Progesterone concentrations and total area of luteal tissue did not change with respect to treatment or cycle, but CL morphology was altered in the first cycle after MGA treatment. Of the 19 cows that ovulated after withdrawal of MGA, 3 experienced a short luteal phase. These data characterize changes that occur among cows that are fed melengestrol acetate during the postpartum period and enhance observations from prior studies regarding MGA use.     

Comparison of controlled internal drug release device and melengesterol acetate as progestin sources in an estrous synchronization protocol for beef heifers

The objectives of this experiment were to compare estrous synchronization responses and AI pregnancy rates of beef heifers using protocols that included either CIDR or MGA as the progestin source. The hypotheses tested were that: (1) estrous synchronization responses after (a) progestin removal, and (b) PGF(2alpha); and, (2) AI pregnancy rates, do not differ between heifers synchronized with either progestin source. At the start of the experiment (Day 0) in both years, heifers were assigned randomly to receive, MGA supplement for 14 days (MGA-treated; n=79) or CIDR for 14 days (CIDR-treated; n=77). On Day 14 progestin was removed and heifers were observed for estrus up to and after PGF(2alpha) on Days 31 and 33 for CIDR-treated and MGA-treated heifers, respectively. Heifers that exhibited estrus within 60h after PGF(2alpha) were inseminated by AI 12h later; the remaining heifers were inseminated at 72h after PGF(2alpha) and given GnRH (100mug). More (P<0.05) CIDR-treated heifers exhibited estrus within 120h after progestin removal than MGA-treated heifers. Intervals to estrus after progestin removal were shorter (P<0.05) for CIDR-treated heifers than MGA-treated heifers. More (P<0.05) CIDR-treated heifers exhibited estrus and were inseminated within 60h after PGF(2alpha) than MGA-treated heifers. Pregnancy rates did not differ (P>0.10) between MGA-treated (66%) and CIDR-treated (62%) heifers. In conclusion, the use of CIDR as a progestin source in a 14-day progestin, PGF(2alpha), and timed AI and GnRH estrous synchronization protocol was as effective as the use of MGA to synchronize estrus and generate AI pregnancies in beef heifers.     

Synchronization of estrus in yearling beef heifers with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F(2alpha)

This study was designed to test the efficacy of melengestrol acetate (MGA) in combination with prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) in synchronizing estrus in cyclic and noncyclic heifers. One hundred thirty-one cyclic and prepubertal crossbred heifers were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: Controls (n = 43); MGA (0.5 mg/d for 7 d) and PGF(2alpha) (25 mg i.m. on Day 7; n = 44); and PGF(2alpha) (25 mg i.m. on Day 7; n = 44). Observations for estrus were made at 6-n intervals throughout the 7-d treatment period followed by a 34-d artificial insemination breeding season. A greater percentage (P < 0.05) of MGA-PGF(2alpha) noncyclic heifers showed behavioral estrus (91%) than did Control (67%) or PGF(2alpha) heifers (61%) during the 34-d artificial insemination period. There was no difference (P > 0.05) between synchronization rates of the MGA-PGF(2alpha) heifers and PGF(2alpha) heifers 7 d after PGF(2alpha) administration. The percentage of control animals in estrus during the first 25 d of the breeding season did non differ from the synchronized rates of MGA-PGF(2alpha) and PGF(2alpha) heifers (P > 0.05). Conception rates (heifers pregnant/heifers inseminated) did not differ (P > 0.05) for cyclic or prepubertal heifers among Control, MGA-PGF(2alpha) or PGF(2alpha) heifers. Though conception rates did not differ, there was a trend toward lowered conception rates in MGA-PGF(2alpha) heifers.     

Synchronization of estrus in yearling beef heifers with the melengestrol acetate/prostaglandin F(2alpha) system: efficiency of timed insemination 72 hours after prostaglandin treatment

Two experiments were conducted to determine the conception rates of heifers time-inseminated following melengestrol acetate/prostaglandin F(2alpha) (MGA/PG) estrous synchronization treatment. In Experiment 1, timed insemination of heifers at 72 h after the PG injection, without regard for behavioral estrus, tended to improve (P < 0.15) the percentage of heifers pregnant to artificial insemination (AI) compared with that of synchronized heifers bred 12 h after they were first detected in estrus. In the timed-insemination treatment, heifers exhibiting behavioral estrus 48 to 72 h after PG tended to have an increased (P < 0.15) conception rate to AI compared with heifers exhibiting estrus within 48 h of PG administration. In Experiment 2, the number of heifers conceiving to AI following the MGA/PG estrous synchronization regimen was increased by mass insemination of all heifers not exhibiting estrus by 72 h after PG. The pregnancy rate to AI was higher in heifers with serum progesterone (P(4)) concentrations higher than 1 ng/ml compared with that of heifers with concentrations lower than 1 ng/ml. Of heifers with serum P(4) greater than 1 ng/ml, the pregnancy rate to AI tended to be higher when concentrations exceeded 2 ng/ml than when concentrations were 1 to 2 ng/ml. In cyclic heifers, timed insemination can increase the percentage of heifers pregnant after being synchronized with MGA/PG.     

Efficacy of either a single or split treatment of PGF2alpha after a 14 day melengestrol acetate treatment to synchronize estrus and induce luteolysis in Bos indicus x Bos taurus heifers

Two experiments evaluated a modified delivery of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) after a melengestrol acetate (MGA) treatment in Angus and Bos indicus x Bos taurus (BI) heifers. Experiment 1 was replicated three times with yearling BI heifers (n = 695). Heifers received MGA (0.5 mg head(-1) day(-1)) for 14 days. In Replications 1 and 2, heifers received either 25 mg of PGF2alpha im 19 days after MGA (single) or 12.5 mg of PGF2alpha im 19 and 20 days after MGA (split). In Replication 3, heifers received the same treatments, with PGF2alpha initiated either 18 or 19 days after MGA. Estrus was detected for 72 h after PGF2alpha, with AI commencing 8-12 h after a detected estrus. Heifers not observed in estrus by 72 h were timed-AI concomitant with GnRH (100 microg im). Heifers from Replication 2 (n = 146) had blood samples collected at the initial PGF2alpha and at timed-AI to determine corpus luteum (CL) regression by evaluating plasma progesterone concentrations. The interval from MGA withdrawal to PGF2alpha did not have a significant effect on any variable in Replication 3 and there were no treatment by replication effects for any variables, therefore data were pooled. Modifying the PGF2alpha treatment from a single treatment to two treatments on consecutive days increased (P < 0.05) 72 h estrous response (43.2% versus 50.1%), timed-AI (23.9% versus 33.5%) and total-AI pregnancy rates (34.5% versus 42.5%), and CL regression (79.1% versus 92.5%), respectively. In Experiment 2, yearling Angus (n = 66) and 2-year-old BI (n = 68) heifers were synchronized as per Experiment 1 (with the initial PGF2alpha 19 days after MGA). Neither breed nor PGF2alpha treatment effected (P > 0.05) 72 h estrous response, total-AI pregnancy rate, or CL regression rate. In conclusion, treating yearling BI heifers with split treatments of PGF2alpha (given on two consecutive days) improved estrous response and pregnancy rates by increasing PGF2alpha-induced luteolysis.     

The use of progestins in regimens for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle

Four experiments were conducted to investigate modifications to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-based fixed-time Al protocols in beef cattle. In Experiment 1, the effect of reducing the interval from GnRH treatment to prostaglandin (PGF) was examined. Lactating beef cows (n = 111) were given 100 mg gonadorelin (GnRH) on Day 0 (start of treatment) and either 500 microg cloprostenol (PGF) on Day 6 with Al and 100 microg GnRH 60 h later, or PGF on Day 7 with Al and GnRH 48 h later (6- or 7-day Co-Synch regimens). Pregnancy rates were 32/61 (53.3%) versus 26/50 (52.0%), respectively (P = 0.96). In Experiment 2. cattle (n = 196) were synchronized with a 7-day Co-Synch regimen and received either no further treatment or a CIDR-B device (Days 0-7). Pregnancy rates were 32/71 (45.1%) versus 33/77 (42.9%) in cows (P < 0.8), and 9/23 (39.1 %) versus 17/25 (68.0%) in heifers (P < 0.05). In Experiment 3, 49 beef heifers were randomly assigned to receive 12.5 mg pLH on Day 0, PGF on Day 7 and 12.5 mg of pLH on Day 9 with Al 12 h later (pLH Ovsynch), or similar treatment plus a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B), or 1 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 100 mg progesterone on Day 0, a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (EB/ P4 + CIDR-B), PGF on Day 7 (at the time of CIDR-B removal) and 1 mg i.m. EB on Day 8 with AI on Day 9 (52 h after PGF). Pregnancy rate in the EB/P4 + CIDR-B group (75.0%) was higher (P < 0.04) than in the pLH Ovsynch group (37.5%): the pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B group was intermediate (64.7%). In Experiment 4, 266 non-lactating cows were allocated to a 7-day Co-Synch protocol (Co-Synch), a 7-day Co-Synch plus 0.6 mg per head per day melengestrol acetate (MGA) from Days 0 to 6 inclusive (Co-Synch + MGA) or MGA (Days 0-6) plus 2 mg EB and 50 mg progesterone on Day 0. 500 microg PGF on Day 7, 1 mg EB on Day 8 and fixed-time Al 28 h later (EB/ P4 + MGA). Pregnancy rates (P < 0.25) were 44.8% (39/87: Co-Synch), 47.8% (43/90; Co-Synch + MGA), and 60.7% (54/89: EB/P4 + MGA). In conclusion, a 6- or 7-day interval from GnRH to PGF in a Co-Synch regimen resulted in similar pregnancy rates in cows. The addition of a progestin to a Co-Synch or Ovsynch regimen significantly improved pregnancy rates in heifers but not in cows. Progestin-based regimens that included EB consistently resulted in high pregnancy rates to fixed-time Al.     

GnRH treatment at artificial insemination in beef cattle fails to increase plasma progesterone concentrations or pregnancy rates

Treatment with GnRH at the onset of standing estrus increased pregnancy percentages and circulating concentrations of progesterone in repeat breeder dairy cows. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of treatment with GnRH at AI on concentrations of progesterone and conception rates in beef cattle that exhibited estrus. Two hundred ninety-three heifers at four locations were synchronized with the Select Synch plus CIDR protocol (given GnRH and a CIDR was placed into the vagina, and 7 d later, given PGF_2α and CIDR removed; n = 253) or the 14-19 melengestrol acetate (MGA) protocol (MGA fed at 0.5 mg/head/d for 14 d, with PGF_2α 19 d after MGA withdrawal n = 40) and AI was done after detection of estrus. At Location 1, blood samples were collected on Day 2, 4, 6, 10, 15, and 18 after AI (Day 0 = AI). Two hundred and fifty postpartum cows at two locations were synchronized with the Select Synch plus CIDR protocol, and AI was performed after detection of estrus. At AI, cattle were alternately assigned to one of two treatments: (1) treatment with GnRH (100 μg) at AI (n = 127 heifers and n = 108 cows); or (2) non-treated control (n = 120 heifers and n = 119 cows). Concentrations of progesterone tended to be greater in control heifers compared to GnRH-treated heifers on Days 6 (P = 0.08), 10 (P = 0.07), and 15 (P = 0.11). Overall conception rates were 68% and 66% for GnRH treated and control, respectively, and were not different between treatments (P = 0.72). In summary, treatment with GnRH at time of AI had no influence on conception rates in cattle that had exhibited estrus.     

Synchronization of estrus in suckled postpartum beef cows with melengestrol acetate, 48-hour calf removal and PGF2alpha

One hundred and sixty-five suckled postpartum beef cows were utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 estrus synchronization systems for the initiation and synchronization of estrus. The treatment groups consisted of 1) melengestrol acetate (MGA)-PGF2alpha (cows were given 0.5 mg MGA/head/day for 14 d with 25 mg PGF2alpha injected 17 d after the last day of MGA administration); 2) MGA-48-h calf removal (CR)-PGF2alpha (cows were given 0.5 mg MGA/head/day for 14 d with 48-h calf removal starting on the second day after completion of the MGA regimen plus 25 mg PGF2alpha administered 17 d after the last day of MGA); and 3) unsynchronized controls. Cows were assigned to treatments by the numbers of days post partum, body condition, age, and breed of sire. The cows were observed for estrus at 12-h intervals for 5 d after PGF2alpha administration and were artificially inseminated 12 to 18 h after the observed estrus. Both the MGA-PGF2alpha and MGA-CR-PGF2alpha treatments (64.8 and 61.8%) had greater (P < 0.05) 5-d estrus rates than the control treatments (34.5%). The synchronized pregnancy rate was greater (P < 0.05) for the MGA-CR-PGF2alpha than the control treatment.(52.7 vs 30.9%, respectively). The MGA-CR-PGF2alpha cows had a higher 25-d pregnancy rate than either the MGA-PGF2alpha (P < 0.05) or control cows (P < 0.08). Of the anestrous cows at the beginning of treatment, more MGA-CR-PGF2alpha (P = 0.1) and MGA-PGF2alpha cows were cyclic posttreatment than control cows (58.7 and 55.1 vs 44.7%, respectively), suggesting that treatment initiated estrous cycles in only a small number of the anestrous cows. Both MGA-PGF2alpha and MGA-CR-PGF2alpha treatments appear to be effective methods of synchronizing estrus in suckled postpartum beef cows. However, MGA-CR-PGF2alpha was more effective in establishing pregnancy earlier in the breeding season than MGA-PGF2alpha.     

Effects of melengestrol acetate and P.G. 600 on fertility in Rambouillet ewes outside the natural breeding season

The effects of melengestrol acetate (MGA) and P.G. 600 on ewe fertility outside the natural breeding season were evaluated. Rambouillet ewes were assigned to one of four groups: (1) control (C; n=92); (2) PG600 (n=86); (3) MGA (n=99); and (4) MGA+PG600 (n=92). A pellet with or without MGA (0.3mg/ewe/d) was fed at 0.15kg/ewe/d for 7d. On the last day of pellet feeding, ewes were given either saline or 5mL of P.G. 600 i.m. (400IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and 200IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)). Ultrasonography was performed between Days 20 and 25 of gestation for ewes that were mated during the first 6 d of the breeding period from the MGA (n=15) and MGA+PG600 (n=8) groups, and the number of luteal structures and embryos were counted. During the first 6d of the breeding period, MGA increased (P<0.05) the percentage of ewes that mated and conceived when compared to C and PG600 (24.2% vs. 3.3% and 10.5%, respectively). Relative to MGA, the mean (+/-S.E.M.) number of luteal structures per ewe was enhanced (P<0.03) in MGA+PG600 (1.53+/-0.13 vs. 2.38+/-0.42, respectively), however as pregnancy progressed, the number of embryos (1.5+/-0.13 vs. 1.8+/-0.16, respectively) and lambs born (1.3+/-0.15 vs. 1.5+/-0.27, respectively) did not differ. Treatment with MGA reduced (P<0.01) the interval from ram introduction to lambing relative to groups that did not receive MGA (168+/-0.8d vs. 171+/-0.6d, respectively). In conclusion, treatment with MGA increased the percentage of ewes conceiving early in the breeding period. Although P.G. 600 increased the number of luteal structures present per ewe, it did not significantly enhance ewe prolificacy.     

Prolonging the MGA-prostaglandin F2 alpha interval from 17 to 19 days in an estrus synchronization system for heifers

Our objective was to determine whether extending the interval from 17 to 19 d between removal of melengestrol acetate (MGA) feed and administration of PGF2 alpha would alter conception rates, pregnancy rates and the degree of synchrony in replacement beef heifers. A commercial heifer operation in north-central Kansas purchased 591 Angus x Hereford heifers from 12 sources. Prior to the spring breeding season, 14% of the heifers were culled. The remaining heifers were assigned randomly to 2 MGA-PGF2 alpha synchronization systems. All heifers were fed MGA (0.5 mg/head/d) for 14 d, and PGF2 alpha was administered either 17 or 19 d after the completion of MGA feeding. Heifers were inseminated artificially for 30 d followed by 30 d of natural mating. Based on each source, first-service conception rates ranged from 66 to 90%, whereas overall pregnancy rates ranged from 91 to 100%. Heifers given PGF2 alpha on Day 17 after MGA had first-service conception rates of 75.9% compared with 81.4% for heifers receiving PGF2 alpha on Day 19. In response to the PGF2 alpha injection, 99% of the Day 19 heifers that were detected in estrus were inseminated artificially by 72 h after the PGF2 alpha injection, whereas 74% of the heifers in the Day 17 treatment were inseminated by that time. Average interval to artificial insemination (AI) after PGF2 alpha was greater (P < 0.01) for the Day 17 heifers (73.1 +/- 1.1 h) than for the Day 19 heifers (56.2 +/- 1.1 h). No differences in conception rates or overall pregnancy rates occurred; however, heifers receiving PGF2 alpha on Day 19 after MGA had shorter intervals to estrus, and a greater proportion was inseminated within 72 h after PGF2 alpha, thus possibly facilitating successful timed insemination of the remaining heifers not yet inseminated by that time.     

Synchronization of estrus in beef heifers using either melengesterol acetate (MGA)/prostaglandin or MGA/Select Synch

The objective of this study was to evaluate synchronization, conception, and pregnancy rates of yearling beef heifers synchronized with either the Select Synch protocol preceded by 7 days of MGA feeding (MGA/Select Synch) or the traditional MGA/PGF protocol. Heifers in the MGA/Select Synch group (n = 402) were fed MGA (0.5 mg/day/head) for 7 days, received an injection of GnRH (100 microg) the day following the last MGA feeding and an injection of PGF (25 mg) 7 days after GnRH. Heifers in the MGA/PGF group (n = 394) received MGA (0.5 mg/day/head) for 14 days, followed by an injection of PGF (25 mg) 17 days later. Synchronization rates tended (P = 0.08) to be higher for the MGA/Select Synch (82%) compared to the MGA/PGF (77%)-treated heifers. Conception and pregnancy rates to AI were similar (P > 0.10), 57 and 46% for the MGA/Select Synch heifers and 61 and 47% for the MGA/PGF heifers, respectively. Mean estrous response (h) was earlier (P < 0.05) for the MGA/Select Synch versus MGA/PGF treatment, 56 versus 61 h post-PGF treatment, respectively. In summary, short-term (7 days) MGA feeding preceding the Select Synch protocol produced similar synchronization, conception, and pregnancy rates as the traditional MGA/PGF protocol.