Linker histones do not interact with DNA containing a single interstrand cross-link created by cisplatin

During our earlier investigations we have observed a prominent preference of the linker histone H1 for binding to a cis-platinated DNA (a synthetic fragment with global type of platination in respect to targets for cisplatin) comparing with unmodified and trans-Pt-modified DNA. In the present work we report our recent experimental results on the binding of the linker histones H1 and H5 to a cisplatin-modified synthetic DNA fragment containing a single nucleotide target d(GC/CG) for inter-platination. Surprisingly, no preferential binding of linker histones to cis-inter-platinated DNA was observed by means of the electromobility-shift assay. The same negative results were obtained with a part of the linker histone molecule suggested to be responsible for DNA-binding--its globular domain. Contrary, the data with another nuclear protein with similar DNA-binding properties as linker histones--HMGB1--showed a strong afinity for interaction with DNA containing interstrand cross-links.     

Studies on the interaction of H1 histone with superhelical DNA: characterization of the recognition and binding regions of H1 histones.

The very lysine rich histone, H1, isolated from a variety of sources interacts preferentially with superhelical DNA compared to relaxed DNA duplexes. The nature of this specific interaction has been investigated by studying the ability of various purified fragments of H1 histone from calf thymus to recognize and bind superhelical DNA. The data suggest that the globular region of the H1 histone molecule (amino acid residues 72-106) is involved in the recognition of superhelical DNA. Thus, the H1 histone carboxy-terminal fragment, 72-212, resembles native H1 histone both quantitatively and qualitatively in its ability to discriminate between and bind to superhelical and relaxed DNA while the H1 histone carboxy-terminal fragment, residues 106-212, has lost this specificity, binding superhelical and relaxed DNA equally well. Furthermore, under conditions in which the globular region of the intact H1 histone has been unfolded, the molecule loses its ability to discriminate between superhelical and relaxed DNA, and binds both forms of DNA equally.     

Histone H1-DNA interactions and their relation to chromatin structure and function

The belief that histone H1 interacts primarily with DNA in chromatin and much less with the protein component has led to numerous studies of artificial H1-DNA complexes. This review summarizes and discusses the data on different aspects of the interaction between the linker histone and naked DNA, including cooperativity of binding, preference for supercoiled DNA, selectivity with respect to base composition and nucleotide sequence, and effect of H1 binding on the conformation of the underlying DNA. The nature of the interaction, the structure of the complexes, and the role histone H1 exerts in chromatin are also discussed.     

In vitro induction of H1-H1 histone cross-linking by adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymers

It is well-known that H1-H1 interactions are very important for the induction of 30 nm chromatin fiber and that, among all posttranslational modifications, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is one of those capable of modifying chromatin structure, mainly through H1 histone. As this protein can undergo both covalent and noncovalent modifications by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, our aim was to investigate whether and how ADP-ribose polymers, by themselves, are able to affect the formation of H1-H1 oligomers, which are normally present in a condensed chromatin structure. The results obtained in our in vitro experimental system indicate that ADP-ribose polymers are involved in chromatin decondensation. This conclusion was reached as the result of two different observations: (a) H1 histone molecules can be hosted in clusters on ADP-ribose polymers, as shown by their ability to be chemically cross-linked, and (b) H1 histone has a higher affinity for ADP-ribose polymers than for DNA; ADP-ribose polymers compete, in fact, with DNA for H1 histone binding.     

Sequence preference of mouse H1(0) and H1t.

Histone H1 proteins bind to DNA and are important in formation and maintenance of chromatin structure. Little is known about differences among variant H1 histones in their interactions with DNA. We examined the effects of histones H1(0) and H1t on thermal denaturation of several DNA species. One of the DNA molecules was a 214-base-pair fragment from the plasmid pBR322, which contains an AT-rich and a GC-rich region. Both H1(0) and H1t bound preferentially to one region of the DNA fragment, a region that is relatively GC-rich. This result indicates that histones H1(0) and H1t are not totally nonspecific but rather bind with some sequence preference to DNA. This conclusion was supported by studies of other DNA species, including two 92-base-pair fragments derived from the two regions of the 214-mer, and several synthetic homocopolymers of DNA. Data obtained with the homocopolymers suggested that the binding preference was not simple preference for GC base pairs. The binding of the two H1 variants was not identical: there appear to be differences in binding site sizes, affinities, and sequence selectivities between H1t and H1(0).     

H3K36me2/3 Binding and DNA Binding of the DNA Methyltransferase DNMT3A PWWP Domain Both Contribute to its Chromatin Interaction

The PWWP domain of DNMT3 DNA methyltransferases binds to histone H3 tails containing methylated K36, and this activity is important for heterochromatic targeting. Here, we show that the PWWP domain of mouse DNMT3A binds to H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 with a slight preference for H3K36me2. PWWP domains have also been reported to bind to DNA, and the close proximity of H3K36 and nucleosomal DNA suggests a combined binding to H3K36me2/3 and DNA. We show here that the DNMT3A PWWP domain binds to DNA with a weak preference for AT-rich sequences and that the designed charge reversal R362E mutation disrupts DNA binding. The K295E mutation, as well as K295I recently identified in paraganglioma, a rare neuroendocrine neoplasm, disrupts both DNA and H3K36me2/3 binding, which is in agreement with the proximity of K295 to residues involved in K36me2/3 methyllysine binding. Nucleosome pulldown experiments show that DNA binding and H3K36me2/3 binding are important for the interaction of the DNMT3A PWWP domain with nucleosomes. Localization studies of transiently transfected fluorescently-tagged wild-type and PWWP-mutated full-length DNMT3A indicate that both interactions contribute to the subnuclear localization of DNMT3A in mouse cells. In summary, our data demonstrate that the combined binding of the DNMT3A PWWP domain to the H3 tail containing K36me2/3 and to the nucleosomal or linker DNA is important for its chromatin interaction and subnuclear targeting of DNMT3A in living cells.     

Effect of salt on the binding of the linker histone H1 to DNA and nucleosomes

The linker histones are involved in the salt-dependent folding of the nucleosomes into higher-order chromatin structures. To better understand the mechanism of action of these histones in chromatin, we studied the interactions of the linker histone H1 with DNA at various histone/DNA ratios and at different ionic strengths. In direct competition experiments, we have confirmed the binding of H1 to superhelical DNA in preference to linear or nicked circular DNA forms. We show that the electrophoretic mobility of the H1/supercoiled DNA complex decreases with increasing H1 concentrations and increases with ionic strengths. These results indicate that the interaction of the linker histone H1 with supercoiled DNA results in a soluble binding of H1 with DNA at low H1 or salt concentrations and aggregation at higher H1 concentrations. Moreover, we show that H1 dissociates from the DNA or nucleosomes at high salt concentrations. By the immobilized template pull-down assay, we confirm these data using the physiologically relevant nucleosome array template.     

Conformation of reconstituted mononucleosomes and effect of linker histone H1 binding studied by scanning force microscopy

The conformation of mononucleosome complexes reconstituted with recombinant core histones on a 614-basepair-long DNA fragment containing the Xenopus borealis 5S rRNA nucleosome positioning sequence was studied by scanning/atomic force microscopy in the absence or presence of linker histone H1. Imaging without prior fixation was conducted with air-dried samples and with mononucleosomes that were injected directly into the scanning force microscopy fluid cell and visualized in buffer. From a quantitative analysis of approximately 1,700 complexes, the following results were obtained: i), In the absence of H1, a preferred location of the nucleosome at the X. borealis 5S rRNA sequence in the center of the DNA was detected. From the distribution of nucleosome positions, an energy difference of binding to the 5S rRNA sequence of DeltaDeltaG approximately 3 kcal mol(-1) as compared to a random sequence was estimated. Upon addition of H1, a significantly reduced preference of nucleosome binding to this sequence was observed. ii), The measured entry-exit angles of the DNA at the nucleosome in the absence of H1 showed two maxima at 81 +/- 29 degrees and 136 +/- 18 degrees (air-dried samples), and 78 +/- 25 degrees and 137 +/- 25 degrees (samples imaged in buffer solution). In the presence of H1, the species with the smaller entry-exit angle was stabilized, yielding average values of 88 +/- 34 degrees for complexes in air and 85 +/- 10 degrees in buffer solution. iii), The apparent contour length of the nucleosome complexes was shortened by 34 +/- 13 nm as compared to the free DNA due to wrapping of the DNA around the histone octamer complex. Considering an 11 nm diameter of the nucleosome core complex, this corresponds to a total of 145 +/- 34 basepairs that are wound around the nucleosome.     

CAP binding to B and Z forms of DNA.

We have examined the interaction between the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CAP) and a small DNA fragment containing its specific recognition sequence by circular dichroism spectroscopy. The binding of CAP to this fragment induces a B to "C-like" change in the CD spectrum, which is different from that observed for non-specific binding. A one-to-one (CAP dimer to DNA) binding stoichiometry was deduced from spectroscopic titration data, as was a non-specific binding site size of 17 bp/dimer. In addition, we have compared the non-specific binding affinity of CAP for the B and Z forms of synthetic DNA copolymers. A slight preference for the B form was found. These results do not support the recent specific suggestion that CAP binds to a left-handed form of DNA (1), but indicate more generally that an optically detectable conformational change takes place in DNA on binding CAP.     

Histone H3 Inhibits Ubiquitin-Ubiquitin Intermolecular Interactions to Enhance Binding to DNA Methyl Transferase 1

DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1) is crucial for cell maintenance and preferentially methylates hemimethylated DNA. Recently, a study revealed that Dnmt1 is timely and site-specifically activated by several types of two-mono-ubiquitinated histone H3 tails (H3Ts). However, the molecular mechanism of Dnmt1 activation has not yet been determined, in addition to the role of H3T. Based on experimental data, two-mono-ubiquitinated H3Ts activate Dnmt1 by binding, with different binding affinities. In contrast, ubiquitin molecules unlinked with H3T do not bind to Dnmt1. Despite the existence of experimental data, it is unclear why the binding affinities for Dnmt1 are different. To obtain new insights into the activation mechanism of Dnmt1, we performed all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on three systems: (1) K14/K18, (2) K14/K23 mono-ubiquitinated H3Ts, and (3) two ubiquitin molecules unlinked with H3T. As an analysis of our MD trajectories, these ubiquitylation patterns modulated ubiquitin-ubiquitin intermolecular interactions. More specifically, the intermolecular contacts between a pair of ubiquitin molecules linked with H3T became weak in the presence of H3T, indicating that H3T makes a cleft between them to inhibit their intermolecular interactions. For these three systems, the intermolecular interactions between the ubiquitin molecules calculated by our MD simulations are in good agreement with the binding affinities for Dnmt1 experimentally measured in a previous study. Therefore, we conclude that H3T acts as a spacer to inhibit ubiquitin-ubiquitin intermolecular interactions, enhancing binding to Dnmt1.     

The multi-domain protein Np95 connects DNA methylation and histone modification

DNA methylation and histone modifications play a central role in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression and cell differentiation. Recently, Np95 (also known as UHRF1 or ICBP90) has been found to interact with Dnmt1 and to bind hemimethylated DNA, indicating together with genetic studies a central role in the maintenance of DNA methylation. Using in vitro binding assays we observed a weak preference of Np95 and its SRA (SET- and Ring-associated) domain for hemimethylated CpG sites. However, the binding kinetics of Np95 in living cells was not affected by the complete loss of genomic methylation. Investigating further links with heterochromatin, we could show that Np95 preferentially binds histone H3 N-terminal tails with trimethylated (H3K9me3) but not acetylated lysine 9 via a tandem Tudor domain. This domain contains three highly conserved aromatic amino acids that form an aromatic cage similar to the one binding H3K9me3 in the chromodomain of HP1ß. Mutations targeting the aromatic cage of the Np95 tandem Tudor domain (Y188A and Y191A) abolished specific H3 histone tail binding. These multiple interactions of the multi-domain protein Np95 with hemimethylated DNA and repressive histone marks as well as with DNA and histone methyltransferases integrate the two major epigenetic silencing pathways.     

The organization of the histone genes in the genome of Xenopus laevis.

We have studied the organization of the histone genes in the DNA from several individuals of Xenopus laevis. For that purpose, Southern blots of genomic DNA, that was digested with several restriction enzymes, were hybridized with radioactively labeled DNA fragments from clone X1-hi-1 (14), containing genes for Xenopus histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. In the DNA of all animals that were screened we found a major repeating unit of 14 kilobasepairs, which contains genes for histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 (H1 not tested) and is represented up to 30 times in the genome. The order of the genes in this major repeating unit is H4 - H3 - H2A - H2B. This order is different from that in the histone DNA of clone X1-hi-1, i.e. H3 - H4 - H2A - H2B. In addition to the genes in the major repeating unit, histone genes are present in unique restriction fragments in numbers that vary from one animal to another. The restriction patterns for the histone genes in these unique fragments were found to be different for all eight Xenopus individuals that were screened. The cloned Xenopus histone gene fragment X1-hi-1 represents such a unique fragment and is not present in the DNA of each single individual. The total number of genes coding for each of the nucleosomal histones is 45-50 per haploid genome.     

Carboxyl-terminal peptides from histone H1 variants: DNA binding characteristics and solution conformation

The carboxyl-terminal domains of the histone H1 proteins bind to DNA and are important in condensation of DNA. Little is known about the details of the interactions between H1 histones and DNA, and in particular, there is little known about differences among variant H1 histones in their interactions with DNA. Questions concerning H1 histone-DNA affinity and H1 conformation were investigated using peptide fragments from the carboxyl terminal domains of four nonallelic histone H1 variant proteins (mouse H1-1, H1-4 and H1^°, and rat H1T). Three of the four peptides showed a slight preference for binding to a GC-rich region of a 214-base-pair DNA fragment, rather than to an AT-rich region. The fourth peptide, H1t, appeared to bind preferentially to the AT-rich region of the 214-base-pair fragment. The results show that these small peptides bind preferentially to a subset of DNA sequences; such sequence preference might be exhibited by the intact H1 histones themselves. CD spectra of the peptides, which are from regions of the proteins that are not compactly folded, showed that the α-helical content of the peptides was minimal if the peptides were in 10 mM phosphate buffer, but increased if the peptides were in 1 M NaClO₄ and 50% trifluoroethanol, conditions that are postulated to approximate certain aspects of binding to DNA. H1-4 peptide, which was predicted to be 70% α-helix, but was not α-helical in 10 mM phosphate buffer, appeared from difference CD spectra to be more α-helical when it was bound to DNA. The regions of the proteins from which these peptides are derived, which are extended in solution, may fold, forming α-helices, upon binding to DNA. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Chromatin-associated DNA endonucleases from xeroderma pigmentosum cells are defective in interaction with damaged nucleosomal DNA

The influence of nucleosome structure on the activity of 2 chromatin-associated DNA endonucleases, pIs 4.6 and 7.6, from normal human and xeroderma pigmentosum, complementation group A (XPA), lymphoblastoid cells was examined on DNA containing either psoralen monoadducts or cross-links. As substrate a reconstituted nucleosomal system was utilized consisting of a plasmid DNA and either core (H2A, H2B, H3, H4), or total (core plus H1) histones from normal or XPA cells. Both non-nucleosomal and nucleosomal DNA were treated with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) plus long-wavelength ultraviolet radiation (UVA), which produces monoadducts and DNA interstrand cross-links, and angelicin plus UVA, which produces monoadducts. Both normal endonucleases were over 2-fold more active on both types of psoralen-plus-UVA-damaged core nucleosomal DNA than on damaged non-nucleosomal DNA. Addition of histone H1 to the system reduced but did not abolish this increase. By contrast, neither XPA endonuclease showed any increase on psoralen-treated nucleosomal DNA, with or without histone H1. Mixing the normal with the XPA endonucleases led to complementation of the XPA defect. These results indicate that interaction of these endonucleases with chromatin is of critical importance and that it is at this level that a defect exists in XPA endonucleases.