薜荔和薜荔榕小蜂的共生

桑科榕属(Ficus)植物都有隐头花序,其瘿花中栖生着榕小蜂科(Agaonidae)昆虫。榕属植物的隐头花序为榕小蜂的生存提供食物和场所,榕小蜂为榕属植物传粉而效力。这类动植物间的密切的共生关系早在1亿多年前已经确立,它们兴衰与共,互为依存,繁衍至今,但人们对这种关系的确切了解却只有二三十年的历史。本文记述的薜荔和薜荔榕小蜂的形态结构、生活史及生物学行为是我国此类共生关系研究的第一例,可作为科研、教学上阐明隐头花序的形成、演化等生物进化辨证法则的实例。     

宽盾榕小蜂属(小蜂总科,榕小蜂科)及一新种研究

记述榕小蜂科宽盾榕小蜂属Acophila1新种,Acophila quinata sp.nov.,本种育自小叶榕Ficus microcarpa L.榕果。研究标本保存在中国科学院动物研究所动物标本馆。     

雀榕及其传粉昆虫传粉生态研究

雀榕（Ficus virens)花是单性的,雌雄同株,每一个隐头花序里同时具有雌花和雄花,雌花有长柱花和短柱花（瘿花）的分化,但二者均能结实和形成虫瘿,在生理上仍未分离,在这些花序中生长着4种小蜂总科的昆虫,其中榕小蜂科的2个种是雀榕的传粉省,尤以雀榕小蜂（Blastophagea sp.)为雀榕的主要传粉者,是共生体系的真正的互惠共生伙伴,冠缝榕小蜂（B.coronata)则是次要的传粉者也是主要传粉者的竞争者,食榕小蜂（Sycophila sp.)和刻腹小蜂（Ormyrus sp.)是上述2种榕小蜂的寄生者,但是刻腹小蜂的雄蜂也能参与出飞孔开掘,首次报道了我国雌雄同株的榕属植物和传粉昆虫的季节性环境胁迫下的共生关系,并探讨了共生体系维持的对策。     

福州大叶榕隐头果内榕小蜂的分类

通过对福州两个样地大叶榕雄花期隐头果进行定时、定点采集,观察与鉴定,从546个花序果内共收集到榕小蜂33641头,隶属于小蜂总科中的7个科(亚科)7个属的11个种,其中传粉小蜂为榕小蜂科的Platyscapa coronata,其余10种非传粉小蜂分别隶属于隐针榕小蜂亚科Epichrysomallinae,金小蜂科Pteromalidae的锥尾榕小蜂亚科Otitesellinae和延腹榕小蜂亚科Sycoryctinae,广肩小蜂科Eurytomidae,刻腹小蜂科Ormyridae和姬小蜂科Eulophidae。传粉小蜂和非传粉小蜂的种类和数量呈现明显的季节性。冬-春季(12-翌年5月)榕果内小蜂的种类和数量较多,传粉榕小蜂是优势种;夏-秋季(6-11月间)小蜂种类和数量略少,Camarothorax bismasculinus和Sycophila sp.1是优势种。在非传粉小蜂中,Camarothorax、Sycophila、Otitesella、Sycoscapter等4个属的榕小蜂为常见种,而Ormyrus和Aprostocetus等2个属的榕小蜂为偶见种。根据小蜂的形态特征制定大叶榕隐头果中榕小蜂种类检索表,本实验为榕小蜂分类、榕-蜂协同进化研究,以及非传粉小蜂对榕-蜂共生体系的影响等研究提供科学依据。     

热带雨林片断化对榕小蜂和榕树物种的影响

榕树是热带雨林生态系统中的一类关键物种。榕树必须依靠榕小传数值和获得有性繁殖;而榕小蜂的幼虫又必须依靠榕树瘿花为食才能生长生长和繁衍后代,因此二者间有着密切的共生关系。研究表明：在西双版纳热带雨林榕小蜂科有３属１７种分布。热带十麻片断化使榕小蜂和榕树的种类呈明显下降趋势;片断热带雨林面积的大小二对二得的物种娄和个体数有明显的影响。     

种间专性协同进化关系对榕属分类的影响

榕与榕小蜂的专性共生系统为人们提供了研究生物协同进化规律和进化历史的完美范例,已成为国际上研究植物与昆虫相互作用的一个热点。这也给仅根据外部形态等传统方法进行的榕属经典分类带来了极大的影响和冲击。为了进一步研究榕属的系统与进化,介绍了该属分类学研究的历史、主要分类系统和存在的问题,并对今后榕属分类的发展趋势进行展望。     

中国榕属榕亚属植物的系统发育初探

对分布于中国的榕亚属植物的15个种和2个变种(分别代表榕亚属的3个组)的nrDNA的ITS序列和系统发育关系进行分析。结果表明,榕亚属是非单系起源,其中榕组构成了一个独立的单系群,与无花果亚属有较近的亲缘关系,而与榕亚属其它组间并未表现出近缘关系。榕亚属的其它5个组构成一单系群并得到中度的支持率。来自中国的种类分别聚在相应的组内。但环纹榕组被分成2个单支,其中来自中国的大叶水榕(F.glaberrima)和环纹榕(F.annulata)构成一个分支,二者表现较近的亲缘关系。榕亚属的亚洲特有组印度榕组在ITS树中聚在环纹榕组的另一个分支中,但它与此组其它种的亲缘关系并不清楚。     

大果榕亚组三种榕树传粉榕小蜂核型研究

研究了木瓜榕(Ficus auriculata Loureiro)、苹果榕(F.oligodon Miquel)及未知榕(Ficus sp.)3种榕树传粉榕小蜂的核型。结果表明:3种榕树对应的传粉榕小蜂具有非常相似的核型,染色体数目相同为2n=10,染色体全部为中着丝粒染色体;核型公式2n=2X=10=10M,核型均为Stebbins-1A型。以臂比不对称性系数Dc和相对长度不对称性系数Dt作二维散点图,Ceratosolen emarginatus Mayr(木瓜榕传粉榕小蜂)和C.emarginatus Mayr(苹果榕传粉榕小蜂)具有非常相近的核型不对称系数,核型不对称性大于Ceratosolen sp.(未知榕传粉榕小蜂),显示出两者更近的亲缘关系,而Ceratosolen sp.(未知榕)与前两者亲缘关系较远。此外,比较了Ceratosolen属和Blastophaga属在核型方面的差异,认为染色体数目包括染色体形态能够作为准确区分Ceratosolen属和Blastophaga属的依据,并对Ceratosolen属的核型进化进行了初步探讨。     

榕树-榕小蜂的物种共形成

榕树-榕小蜂的互惠共生是植物与其传粉者间相互作用的最极端的特例,几乎每一种榕树均由榕小蜂科的一种特定昆虫传粉,而它们的小蜂也只能在此特定榕树种的花内养育它们的幼虫,构成了高度的种专一性(一对一原则).因此榕树及其传粉昆虫间的相互作用被看作是专性互惠共生的最极端特例,也引起人们对它们共趋异及物种形成的诸多推测.对目前榕树一榕小蜂的物种共形成的研究进行了回顾与阐述,希望能对全面认识这对完美的共生伙伴及物种共形成机制提供一些启示.     

粗叶榕—爪哇榕小蜂共生体系的研究

粗叶榕是榕属灌木或小乔木 ,雌雄异株。一年到头皆有不同发育阶段的花序 ,序内开花同步 ,株内开花异步。雌花序有长柱雌花平均为 641 .2枚 ,雄花序中有短柱雌花 (瘿花 )平均为 488.2枚 ,自然状态下结实率和成虫率分别为 5 1 .3 7%和 3 6.1 1 %。榕小蜂科的爪哇榕小蜂是粗叶榕的传粉者 ,是共生体系的真正的互惠共生伙伴。二者在形态结构、生理功能上高度互适 ,粗叶榕必须依靠爪哇榕小蜂的传粉才能获得有性生殖 ;而爪哇榕小蜂又必须依赖粗叶榕的短柱头雌花作为繁殖后代的场所 ,才能获得种群的繁衍。     

榕树-传粉者共生体系的协同进化与系统学研究进展及展望

 榕树-传粉者共生体系是目前植物与昆虫协同进化研究中的典型模式之一。国内外已经开展了大量的相关研究,从不同方面探讨了其特殊的一一对应的共生关系。榕树-传粉者的专一性互惠共生关系中蕴含了与系统发育有关的多因子协同进化的机理,因此,进行系统发育研究将有助于更好地揭示榕树-传粉者的协同进化历史和理解二者的专一性互惠共生关系。本文简单地介绍了目前榕树及其传粉者共生体系的研究状况之后,论述了榕树-传粉者协同进化的系统发育分子生物学研究成果。同时针对国际上在榕属植物的传统的系统与分类研究中存在的一些分歧及榕树传粉者亚科分类不匹配等问题,回顾了榕属的分类研究进展及其与传粉者的关系。最后,结合我国榕树与传粉者共生体系的研究状况对我国榕属的重新分类和系统发育研究作了展望。     

Phylogenetic relationships of fig wasps pollinating functionally dioecious Ficus based on mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphology

The obligate mutualism between pollinating fig wasps in the family Agaonidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) and Ficus species (Moraceae) is often regarded as an example of co-evolution but little is known about the history of the interaction, and understanding the origin of functionally dioecious fig pollination has been especially difficult. The phylogenetic relationships of fig wasps pollinating functionally dioecious Ficus were inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene sequences (mtDNA) and morphology. Separate and combined analyses indicated that the pollinators of functionally dioecious figs are not monophyletic. However, pollinator relationships were generally congruent with host phylogeny and support a revised classification of Ficus. Ancestral changes in pollinator ovipositor length also correlated with changes in fig breeding systems. In particular, the relative elongation of the ovipositor was associated with the repeated loss of functionally dioecious pollination. The concerted evolution of interacting morphologies may bias estimates of phylogeny based on female head characters, but homoplasy is not so strong in other morphological traits. The lesser phylogenetic utility of morphology than of mtDNA is not due to rampant convergence in morphology but rather to the greater number of potentially informative characters in DNA sequence data; patterns of nucleotide substitution also limit the utility of mtDNA findings. Nonetheless, inferring the ancestral associations of fig pollinators from the best-supported phylogeny provided strong evidence of host conservatism in this highly specialized mutualism.     

Convergence and coevolution in a mutualism: evidence from a molecular phylogeny of Ficus

Abstract.— The interaction between Ficus (Moraceae) and their pollinating wasps (Chalcidoidea: Agaonidae; more than 700 species-specific couples) is one of the most specialized mutualisms found in nature. Both partners of this interaction show extensive variation in their respective biology. Here we investigate Ficus life-history trait evolution and fig/fig wasp coadaptation in the context of a well-resolved molecular phylogeny. Mapping out variations in Ficus life-history traits on an independently derived phylogeny constructed from ribosomal DNA sequences (external and internal transcribed spacer) reveals several parallel transitions in Ficus growth habit and breeding system. Convergent trait evolution might explain the discrepancies between morphological analyses and our molecular reconstruction of the genus. Morphological characters probably correlate with growth habit and breeding system and could therefore be subject to convergent evolution. Furthermore, we reconstruct the evolution of Ficus inflorescence characters that are considered adaptations to the pollinators. Our phylogeny reveals convergences in ostiole shape, stigma morphology, and stamen:ovule ratio. Statistical tests taking into account the phylogenetic relationship of the species show that transitions in ostiole shape are correlated with variation in wasp pollinator head shape, and evolutionary changes in stigma morphology and stamen:ovule ratio correlate with changes in the pollination behavior of the associated wasp. These correlations provide evidence for reciprocal adaptations of morphological characters between these mutualistic partners that have interacted over a long evolutionary time. In light of previous ecological studies on mutualism, we discuss the adaptive significance of these correlations and what they can tell us about the coevolutionary process occurring between figs and their pollinators.     

非传粉小蜂的食性及其对榕树-传粉小蜂系统稳定性的影响

榕树与其传粉小蜂形成了高度专一的互惠共生系统。非传粉小蜂则是该系统的资源掠夺者,但它与该系统共存的机制仍不清楚。于2003年12月-2004年4月在西双版纳以聚果榕（Ficus racemosa L．）为材料,研究了寄生在聚果榕榕果内的5种非传粉小蜂的食性及相互关系,以探讨非传粉小蜂与榕树-传粉小蜂系统共存的机制。结果表明：寄生在聚果榕榕果内的5种非传粉小蜂中,仅Platyneura testacea Motschulsky和Platyneura,mayri Rasplus能刺激子房发育成瘿花,是造瘿者;Apocrypta sp．,Apocrypta westwoodi Grandi和Platyneura agraensis Joseph不能刺激子房发育成瘿花,是拟寄生者。传粉小蜂的拟寄生者和造瘿者对传粉小蜂有负的影响。但在蚂蚁和造瘿者的拟寄生蜂作用下,这种负面影响并不显著,而且它们对榕树繁殖没有显著影响。对小蜂自然种群的分析表明,传粉小蜂处于优势地位。说明在自然情况下传粉小蜂的拟寄生者和造瘿者的种群维持在一个较低水平,对榕树一传粉小蜂系统稳定性影响较小,故能与之长期共存。     

Pollination and parasitism in functionally dioecious figs

Fig wasps (Agaonidae: Hymenoptera) are seed predators and their interactions with Ficus species (Moraceae) range from mutualism to parasitism. Recently considerable attention has been paid to conflicts of interest between the mutualists and how they are resolved in monoecious fig species. However, despite the fact that different conflicts can arise, little is known about the factors that influence the persistence of the mutualism in functionally dioecious Ficus. We studied the fig pollinator mutualism in 14 functionally dioecious fig species and one monoecious species from tropical lowland rainforests near Madang, Papua New Guinea. Observations and experiments suggest that (i) pollinating wasps are monophagous and attracted to a particular host species; (ii) pollinating and non-pollinating wasps are equally attracted to gall (male) figs and seed (female) figs in functionally dioecious species; (iii) differing style lengths between gall figs and seed figs may explain why pollinators do not develop in the latter; (iv) negative density dependence may stabilize the interaction between pollinating wasps and their parasitoids; and (v) seed figs may reduce the search efficiency of non-pollinators. This increased pollinator production without a corresponding decrease in seed production could provide an advantage for dioecy in conditions where pollinators are limiting.     

Shift to mutualism in parasitic lineages of the fig/fig wasp interaction

The interaction between Ficus and their pollinating wasps (Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae) represents a striking example of mutualism. Figs also host numerous non-pollinating wasps belonging to other chalcidoid families. We show that six species of Ficus that are passively pollinated by the agaonid genus Waterstoniella also host specific wasps belonging to the chalcidoid genera Diaziella (Sycoecinae) and Lipothymus (Otitesellinae). Both belong to lineages that are considered as parasites of the fig/fig wasp mutualism. We show that these wasps are efficient pollinators of their hosts. Pollen counts on wasps of a species of Diaziella hosted by Ficus paracamptophylla show that Diaziella sp. transports more pollen than the associated pollinator when emerging from its natal fig. Further, the number of pollinated flowers in receptive figs is best explained by the number of Diaziella plus the number of Waterstoniella that had entered it. Figs that were colonised by Diaziella always produced seeds: Diaziella does not overexploit its host. Similarly, figs of Ficus consociata that were colonised solely by a species of Lipothymus produced as many seeds as figs that were colonised only by the legitimate pollinator Waterstoniella malayana . Diaziella sp. and Lipothymus sp. seem to pollinate their host fig as efficiently as do the associated agaonid wasps. Previous studies, on actively pollinated Ficus species, have found that internally ovipositing non-agaonid wasps are parasites of such Ficus species. Hence, mode of pollination of the legitimate pollinator conditions the outcome of the interaction between internally ovipositing parasites and their host.     

Different Stimuli Reduce Attraction to Pollinators in Male and Female Figs in the Dioecious Fig Ficus hispida

Fig trees ( Ficus ) and their obligate pollinating wasps (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae) are a classic example of a coevolved mutualism. Pollinating wasps are attracted to figs only when figs are receptive. It has been shown that figs will lose their attraction to pollinators sooner in monoecious and male dioecious figs when multiple pollinators have entered the enclosed inflorescence. However, little is known about the nature of the stimulus inducing the loss of attraction. By conducting experiments on the functionally dioecious fig, Ficus hispida , we show that (1) different stimuli induce the loss of attraction in each sex, pollination in female figs, and oviposition in male figs; and (2) foundress number affects the loss of attraction in both sexes only when the prerequisites ( i.e ., pollination in female figs and oviposition in male figs) have been satisfied. In general, the more foundresses that enter, the earlier the fig will lose its receptivity. We argue that the stimuli in male and female figs are adaptations to the fulfillment of its respective reproduction.     

Can chemical signals,responsible for mutualistic partner encounter,promote the specific exploitation of nursery pollination mutualisms? – The case of figs and fig wasps

In nursery pollination mutualisms, where pollinators reproduce within the inflorescence they pollinate, floral scents often play a major role in advertizing host location and rewards for the pollinator. However, chemical messages emitted by the plant that are responsible for the encounter of mutualist partners can also be used by parasites of these mutualisms to locate their host. Each species of Ficus (Moraceae) is involved in an obligatory nursery pollination mutualism with usually one pollinating fig wasp (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Agaonidae). In this interaction, volatile compounds emitted by receptive figs are responsible for the attraction of their specific pollinator. However, a large and diverse community of non-pollinating chalcidoid wasps can also parasitize this mutualism. We investigated whether the chemical message emitted by figs to attract their pollinator can promote the host specificity of non-pollinating fig wasps. We analysed the volatile compounds emitted by receptive figs of three sympatric Ficus species, namely, Ficus hispida L., Ficus racemosa L., and Ficus tinctoria G. Forster, and tested the attraction of the pollinator of F. hispida ( Ceratosolen solmsi marchali Mayr), and of one species of non-pollinating fig wasp [ Philotrypesis pilosa Mayr (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae)] to scents emitted by receptive figs of these three Ficus species. Analysis of the volatile compounds emitted by receptive figs revealed that the three Ficus species could be clearly distinguished by their chemical composition. Behavioural bioassays performed in a Y-tube olfactometer showed that both pollinator and parasite were attracted only by the specific odour of F. hispida . These results suggest that the use by non-pollinating fig wasps of a specific chemical message produced by figs could limit host shifts by non-pollinating fig wasps.