An Arabidopsis homolog of the bacterial cell division inhibitor SulA is involved in plastid division

Plastids have evolved from an endosymbiosis between a cyanobacterial symbiont and a eukaryotic host cell. Their division is mediated both by proteins of the host cell and conserved bacterial division proteins. Here, we identified a new component of the plastid division machinery, Arabidopsis thaliana SulA. Disruption of its cyanobacterial homolog (SSulA) in Synechocystis and overexpression of an AtSulA-green fluorescent protein fusion in Arabidopsis demonstrate that these genes are involved in cell and plastid division, respectively. Overexpression of AtSulA inhibits plastid division in planta but rescues plastid division defects caused by overexpression of AtFtsZ1-1 and AtFtsZ2-1, demonstrating that its role in plastid division may involve an interaction with AtFtsZ1-1 and AtFtsZ2-1.     

Plastid division coordination across a double-membraned structure

Chloroplasts still retain components of the bacterial cell division machinery and research over the past decade has led to an understanding of how these stromal division proteins assemble and function as a complex chloroplast division machinery. However, during evolution plant chloroplasts have acquired a number of cytosolic division proteins, indicating that unlike the cyanobacterial ancestors of plastids, chloroplast division in higher plants require a second division machinery located on the chloroplast outer envelope membrane. Here we review the current understanding of the stromal and cytosolic plastid division machineries and speculate how two protein machineries coordinate their activities across a double-membraned structure.     

GIANT CHLOROPLAST 1 is essential for correct plastid division in Arabidopsis

Plastids are vital plant organelles involved in many essential biological processes. Plastids are not created de novo but divide by binary fission mediated by nuclear-encoded proteins of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic origin. Although several plastid division proteins have been identified in plants, limited information exists regarding possible division control mechanisms. Here, we describe the identification of GIANT CHLOROPLAST 1 (GC1), a new nuclear-encoded protein essential for correct plastid division in Arabidopsis. GC1 is plastid-localized and is anchored to the stromal surface of the chloroplast inner envelope by a C-terminal amphipathic helix. In Arabidopsis, GC1 deficiency results in mesophyll cells harbouring one to two giant chloroplasts, whilst GC1 overexpression has no effect on division. GC1 can form homodimers but does not show any interaction with the Arabidopsis plastid division proteins AtFtsZ1-1, AtFtsZ2-1, AtMinD1, or AtMinE1. Analysis reveals that GC1-deficient giant chloroplasts contain densely packed wild-type-like thylakoid membranes and that GC1-deficient leaves exhibit lower rates of CO(2) assimilation compared to wild-type. Although GC1 shows similarity to a putative cyanobacterial SulA cell division inhibitor, our findings suggest that GC1 does not act as a plastid division inhibitor but, rather, as a positive factor at an early stage of the division process.     

Plastid division in an evolutionary context

Plastids are derived from free-living cyanobacteria that were engulfed by eukaryotic host cells through the process of endosymbiosis and, like their cyanobacterial ancestors, divide by binary fission. Over the last decade the continued identification and functional analysis of plastid division components, coupled with ever-increasing genomic resources, have yielded insights into the origins and evolution of the plastid division mechanism in higher plants. Here we review the current understanding of the evolution of the chloroplast division proteins and present a model of how the machinery has developed to execute plastid division in Arabidopsis.     

Plastid division: across time and space

Plastid division is executed by the coordinated action of at least two molecular machineries--an internal machinery situated on the stromal side of the inner envelope membrane that was contributed by the cyanobacterial endosymbiont from which plastids evolved, and an external machinery situated on the cytosolic side of the outer envelope membrane that was contributed by the host. Here we review progress in defining the components of the plastid division complex and understanding the mechanisms of envelope constriction and division-site placement in plants. We also highlight recent work identifying the first molecular linkage between the internal and external division machineries, shedding light on how their mid-plastid positioning is coordinated across the envelope membranes. Little is known about the mechanisms that regulate plastid division in plant cells, but recent studies have begun to hint at potential mechanisms.     

Plastid division is driven by a complex mechanism that involves differential transition of the bacterial and eukaryotic division rings

During plastid division, two structures have been detected at the division site in separate analyses. The plastid-dividing ring can be detected by transmission electron microscopy as two (or three) electron-dense rings: an outer ring on the cytosolic face of the outer envelope, occasionally a middle ring in the intermembrane space, and an inner ring on the stromal face of the inner envelope. The FtsZ ring, which plays a central role in bacterial division, also is involved in plastid division and is believed to have descended to plastids from cyanobacterial endosymbiosis. The relationship between the two structures is not known, although there is discussion regarding whether they are identical. Biochemical and immunocytochemical investigations, using synchronized chloroplasts of the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae, showed that the plastid FtsZ ring is distinct and separable from the plastid-dividing ring. The FtsZ ring localizes in stroma and faces the inner plastid-dividing ring at the far side from the inner envelope. The FtsZ ring and the inner and outer plastid-dividing rings form in that order before plastid division. The FtsZ ring disappears at the late stage of constriction before dissociation of the plastid-dividing ring, when the constriction is still in progress. Our results suggest that the FtsZ ring;-based system, which originated from a plastid ancestor, cyanobacteria, and the plastid-dividing ring;-based system, which probably originated from host eukaryotic cells, form a complex and are involved in plastid division by distinct modes.     

The genetic control of plastid division in higher plants

The division of plastids is an important part of plastid differentiation and development and in distinct cell types, such as leaf mesophyll cells, results in large populations of chloroplasts. The morphology and population dynamics of plastid division have been well documented, but the molecular controls underlying plastid division are largely unknown. With the isolation of Arabidopsis mutants in which specific aspects of plastid and proplastid division have been disrupted, the potential exists for a detailed knowledge of how plastids divide and what factors control the rate of division in different cell types. It is likely that knowledge of plant homologues of bacterial cell division genes will be essential for understanding this process in full. The processes of plastid division and expansion appear to be mutually independent processes, which are compensatory when either division or expansion are disrupted genetically. The rate of cell expansion appears to be an important factor in initiating plastid division and several systems involving rapid cell expansion show high levels of plastid division activity. In addition, observation of plastids in different cell types in higher plants shows that cell-specific signals are also important in the overall process in determining not only the differentiation pathway of plastids but also the extent of plastid division. It appears likely that with the exploitation of molecular techniques and mutants, a detailed understanding of the molecular basis of plastid division may soon be a reality.     

INTERMEDIATE FEATURES OF CYANELLE DIVISION OF CYANOPHORA PARADOXA (GLAUCOCYSTOPHYTA) BETWEEN CYANOBACTERIAL AND PLASTID DIVISION1

Cyanelles of glaucocystophytes may be the most primitive of the known plastids based on their peptidoglycan content and the sequence phylogeny of cyanelle DNA. In this study, EM observations have been made to characterize the cyanelle division of Cyanophora paradoxa Korshikov and to gain insights into the evolution of plastid division. Constriction of cyanelles involves ingrowth of the septum at the cleavage site with the inner envelope membrane invaginating at the leading edge and the outer envelope membrane invaginating behind the septum. This means the inner and outer envelope membranes do not constrict simultaneously as they do in plastid division in other plants. The septum and the cyanelle envelope became stained after a silver‐methenamine staining was applied for in situ detection of polysaccharides. Septum formation was inhibited by β‐lactams and vancomycin, which are potent inhibitors of bacterial peptidoglycan biosynthesis. These results suggest the presence of peptidoglycan at the septum and the cyanelle envelope. In dividing cyanelles, a single electron‐dense ring (cyanelle ring) was observed on the stromal face of the inner envelope membrane at the isthmus, but no ring‐like structures were detected on the outer envelope membrane. Thus a single, stromal cyanelle ring such as this is quite unique and also distinct from FtsZ rings, which are not detectable by TEM. These features suggest that the cyanelle division of glaucocystophytes represents an intermediate stage between cyanobacterial and plastid division. If monophyly of all plastids is true, the cyanelle ring and the homologous inner plastid dividing ring might have evolved earlier than the outer plastid dividing ring.     

The molecular biology of plastid division in higher plants

Plastids are essential plant organelles vital for life on earth, responsible not only for photosynthesis but for many fundamental intermediary metabolic reactions. Plastids are not formed de novo but arise by binary fission from pre-existing plastids, and plastid division therefore represents an important process for the maintenance of appropriate plastid populations in plant cells. Plastid division comprises an elaborate pathway of co-ordinated events which include division machinery assembly at the division site, the constriction of envelope membranes, membrane fusion and, ultimately, the separation of the two new organelles. Because of their prokaryotic origin bacterial cell division has been successfully used as a paradigm for plastid division. This has resulted in the identification of the key plastid division components FtsZ, MinD, and MinE, as well as novel proteins with similarities to prokaryotic cell division proteins. Through a combination of approaches involving molecular genetics, cell biology, and biochemistry, it is now becoming clear that these proteins act in concert during plastid division, exhibiting both similarities and differences compared with their bacterial counterparts. Recent efforts in the cloning of the disrupted loci in several of the accumulation and replication of chloroplasts mutants has further revealed that the division of plastids is controlled by a combination of prokaryote-derived and host eukaryote-derived proteins residing not only in the plastid stroma but also in the cytoplasm. Based on the available data to date, a working model is presented showing the protein components involved in plastid division, their subcellular localization, and their protein interaction properties.     

Plastid apportionment and preprophase microtubule bands in monoplastidic root meristem cells ofIsoetes andSelaginella

Summary Ultrastructural observations on monoplastidic root tip cells ofIsoetes andSelaginella demonstrate two important phenomena associated with preprophasic preparation for mitotic cell division, 1. the preprophase band and 2. precise orientation of the dividing plastid relative to the preprophase band. Both of these phenomena accurately predict the future plane of cell division. The plastid divides in a plane parallel to the spindle and each cell inherits a single plastid which caps the telophase nucleus. When succesive transverse divisions occur, the plastid migrates prior to prophase from a position near an old transverse wall to a lateral position in the cell. The plastid is oriented with its median constriction precisely intersected by the plane of the preprophase band. When a longitudinal division follows a transverse division, the plastid remains in its position adjacent to an old transverse wall where it is bisected by the plane of the longitudinally oriented preprophase band microtubules.     

Divide and shape: an endosymbiont in action

The endosymbiotic evolution of the plastid within the host cell required development of a mechanism for efficient division of the plastid. Whilst a model for the mechanism of chloroplast division has been constructed, little is known of how other types of plastids divide, especially the proplastid, the progenitor of all plastid types in the cell. It has become clear that plastid shape is highly heterogeneous and dynamic, especially stromules. This article considers how such variation in morphology might be controlled and how such plastids might divide efficiently.     

The division of pleomorphic plastids with multiple FtsZ rings in tobacco BY-2 cells

Plastids, an essential group of plant cellular organelles, proliferate by division to maintain continuity through cell lineages in plants. In recent years, it was revealed that the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ is encoded in the nuclear genome of plant cells, and plays a major role in the plastid division process forming a ring along the center of plastids. Although the best-characterized type of plastid division so far is the division with a single FtsZ ring at the plastid midpoint, it was recently reported that in some plant organs and tissues, plastids are pleomorphic and form multiple FtsZ rings. However, the pleomorphic plastid division mechanism, such as the formation of multiple FtsZ rings, the constriction of plastids and the behavior of plastid (pt) nucleoids, remains totally unclear. To elucidate these points, we used the cultured cell line, tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Bright Yellow-2, in which plastids are pleomorphic and show dynamic morphological changes during culture. As a result, it was revealed that as the plastid elongates from an ellipsoid shape to a string shape after medium renewal, FtsZ rings are multiplied almost orderly and perpendicularly to the long axis of plastids. Active DNA synthesis of pt nucleoids is induced by medium transfer, and the division and the distribution of pt nucleoids occur along with plastid elongation. Although it was thought that the plastid divides with simultaneous multiple constrictions at all the FtsZ ring sites, giving rise to many small plastids, we found that the plastids generally divide constricting at only one FtsZ ring site. Moreover, using electron microscopy, we revealed that plastid-dividing (PD) rings are observed only at the constriction site, and not at swollen regions. These results indicate that in the pleomorphic plastid division with multiple FtsZ rings, the formation of PD rings occurs at a limited FtsZ ring site for one division. Multiplied FtsZ rings seem to localize in advance at the expected sites of division, and the formation of a PD ring at each FtsZ ring site occurs in a certain order, not simultaneously. Based on these results, a novel model for the pleomorphic plastid division with multiple FtsZ rings is proposed.     

DEVELOPMENT OF STOMATA IN SELAGINELLA: DIVISION POLARITY AND PLASTID MOVEMENTS

The young guard cell of Selaginella inherits a single plastid from the division of the stomatal guard mother cell (GMC). During early stomatal development the single plastid undergoes a complex series of migrations and divisions. The regular pattern of plastid behavior appears to be an expression of the genetic program controlling division plane and cytomorphogenesis. The plastid in the GMC becomes precisely aligned with its midconstriction intersected by the plane of a preprophase band of microtubules (PPB) oriented parallel to the long axis of the leaf. This alignment with respect to the future division plane of the cytoplasm ensures equal plastid distribution to the daughter cells. Cytokinesis occurs in the plane previously marked by the PPB and the plastid in each daughter cell lies between the lateral wall and the newly formed nucleus. Following cytokinesis the plastid in each young guard cell develops a median constriction and migrates to the common ventral wall where the isthmus is associated with a system of microtubules in the vicinity of the developing pore region. Plastid division is completed while the plastid is adjacent to the common ventral wall. Following division, the two daughter plastids move back toward the lateral wall. Each plastid may divide again during guard cell maturation but no further migrations occur.     

The ultrastructural features and division of secondary plastids

Plastids in heterokonts, cryptophytes, haptophytes, dinoflagellates, chlorarachniophytes, euglenoids, and apicomplexan parasites derive from secondary symbiogenesis. These plastids are surrounded by one or two additional membranes covering the plastid-envelope double membranes. Consequently, nuclear-encoded plastid division proteins have to be targeted into the division site through the additional surrounding membranes. Electron microscopic observations suggest that the additional surrounding membranes are severed by mechanisms distinct from those for the division of the plastid envelope. In heterokonts, cryptophytes and haptophytes, the outermost surrounding membrane (epiplastid rough endoplasmic reticulum, EPrER) is studded with cytoplasmic ribosomes and connected to the rER and the outer nuclear envelope. In monoplastidic species belonging to these three groups, the EPrER and the outer nuclear envelope are directly connected to form a sac enclosing the plastid and the nucleus. This nuclear-plastid connection, referred to as the nucleus-plastid consortium (NPC), may be significant to ensure the transmission of the plastids during cell division. The plastid dividing-ring (PD-ring) is a conserved component of the division machinery for both primary and secondary plastids. Also, homologues of the bacterial cell division protein, FtsZ, may be involved in the division of secondary plastids as well as primary plastids, though in secondary plastids they have not yet been localized to the division site. It remains to be examined whether or not dynamin-like proteins and other protein components known to function in the division of primary plastids are used also in secondary plastids. The nearly completed sequencing of the nuclear genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana will give impetus to molecular and cell biological studies on the division of secondary plastids.     

Plastid division: evidence for a prokaryotically derived mechanism

Plastid division is a critical process in plant cell biology but it is poorly understood. Recent studies combining mutant analysis, gene cloning, and exploitation of genomic resources have revealed that the molecular machinery associated with plastid division is derived evolutionarily from the bacterial cell division apparatus. Comparison of the two processes provides a basis for identifying new components of the plastid division mechanism, but also serves to highlight the differences, not least of which is the nuclear control of the plastid division process.     

Emerging facets of plastid division regulation

Plastids are complex organelles that are integrated into the plant host cell where they differentiate and divide in tune with plant differentiation and development. In line with their prokaryotic origin, plastid division involves both evolutionary conserved proteins and proteins of eukaryotic origin where the host has acquired control over the process. The plastid division apparatus is spatially separated between the stromal and the cytosolic space but where clear coordination mechanisms exist between the two machineries. Our knowledge of the plastid division process has increased dramatically during the past decade and recent findings have not only shed light on plastid division enzymology and the formation of plastid division complexes but also on the integration of the division process into a multicellular context. This review summarises our current knowledge of plastid division with an emphasis on biochemical features, the functional assembly of protein complexes and regulatory features of the overall process.     

The topological specificity factor AtMinE1 is essential for correct plastid division site placement in Arabidopsis

In plant cells, plastids divide by binary fission involving a complex pathway of events. Although there are clear similarities between bacterial and plastid division, limited information exists regarding the mechanism of plastid division in higher plants. Here we demonstrate that AtMinE1, an Arabidopsis homologue of the bacterial MinE topological specificity factor, is an essential integral component of the plastid division machinery. In prokaryotes MinE imparts topological specificity during cell division by blocking division apparatus assembly at sites other than midcell. We demonstrate that overexpression of AtMinE1 in E. coli results in loss of topological specificity and minicell formation suggesting evolutionary conservation of MinE mode of action. We further show that AtMinE1 can indeed act as a topological specificity factor during plastid division revealing that AtMinE1 overexpression in Arabidopsis seedlings results in division site misplacement giving rise to multiple constrictions along the length of plastids. In agreement with cell division studies in bacteria, AtMinE1 and AtMinD1 show distinct intraplastidic localisation patterns suggestive of dynamic localisation behaviour. Taken together our findings demonstrate that AtMinE1 is an evolutionary conserved topological specificity factor, most probably acting in concert with AtMinD1, required for correct plastid division in Arabidopsis.     

关于质体随细胞分裂传递的数学模型

本文根据质体是具有遗传功能的细胞器这一事实出发,对质体传递规律首次进行了定量研究,建立了突变质体在细胞分裂中传递的全概率和条件概率公式．并对此公式的应用作了进一步的探讨．本文所提供的方法将为质体遗传开辟一条定量研究的新路．     

ARC6 is a J-domain plastid division protein and an evolutionary descendant of the cyanobacterial cell division protein Ftn2

Replication of chloroplasts is essential for achieving and maintaining optimal plastid numbers in plant cells. The plastid division machinery contains components of both endosymbiotic and host cell origin, but little is known about the regulation and molecular mechanisms that govern the division process. The Arabidopsis mutant arc6 is defective in plastid division, and its leaf mesophyll cells contain only one or two grossly enlarged chloroplasts. We show here that arc6 chloroplasts also exhibit abnormal localization of the key plastid division proteins FtsZ1 and FtsZ2. Whereas in wild-type plants, the FtsZ proteins assemble into a ring at the plastid division site, chloroplasts in the arc6 mutant contain numerous short, disorganized FtsZ filament fragments. We identified the mutation in arc6 and show that the ARC6 gene encodes a chloroplast-targeted DnaJ-like protein localized to the plastid envelope membrane. An ARC6-green fluorescent protein fusion protein was localized to a ring at the center of the chloroplasts and rescued the chloroplast division defect in the arc6 mutant. The ARC6 gene product is related closely to Ftn2, a prokaryotic cell division protein unique to cyanobacteria. Based on the FtsZ filament morphology observed in the arc6 mutant and in plants that overexpress ARC6, we hypothesize that ARC6 functions in the assembly and/or stabilization of the plastid-dividing FtsZ ring. We also analyzed FtsZ localization patterns in transgenic plants in which plastid division was blocked by altered expression of the division site-determining factor AtMinD. Our results indicate that MinD and ARC6 act in opposite directions: ARC6 promotes and MinD inhibits FtsZ filament formation in the chloroplast.     

高等植物质体的分裂

质体来源于早期具光合能力的原核生物与原始真核生物的内共生事件。原核起源的蛋白以及真核寄主起源的蛋白共同参与了质体的分裂过程。以原核生物的细胞分裂蛋白为蓝本, 近些年在植物中陆续鉴定出几种主要的原核生物细胞分裂蛋白的同源物, 如FtsZ、MinD和MinE蛋白。然而, 除此之外, 原核细胞大多数分裂相关因子在植物中找不到其同源物, 但却鉴定了许多真核寄主来源的分裂相关蛋白。当前研究的重点是剖析各种质体分裂蛋白协同作用的机制, 业已证明MinD和MinE的协同作用保证了FtsZ(Z)环的正确定位。尽管经典的FtsZ的抑制因子MinC在植物中不存在, 但实验表明ARC3在拟南芥中具有类似MinC的功能。ARC3蛋白与真核起源的蛋白如ARC5、ARTEMIS、FZL和PD环以及其它原核起源的蛋白如ARC6和GC1等共同构成了一个复杂的植物质体分裂调控系统。