Discrimination between SRP- and SecA/SecB-dependent substrates involves selective recognition of nascent chains by SRP and trigger factor

Besides SecA and SecB, Escherichia coli cells possess a signal recognition particle (SRP) to target exported proteins to the SecY translocon. Using chemical and site-specific cross-linking in vitro, we show that SRP recognizes the first signal anchor sequence of a polytopic membrane protein (MtlA) resulting in cotranslational targeting of MtlA to SecY and phospholipids of the plasma membrane. In contrast, a possible interaction of SRP with the secretory protein pOmpA is prevented by the association of trigger factor with nascent pOmpA. Trigger factor also prevents SecA from binding to the first 125 amino acids of pOmpA when they are still associated with the ribosome. Under no experimental conditions was SecA found to interact with MtlA. Likewise, virtually no binding of trigger factor to ribosome-bound MtlA occurs even in the complete absence of SRP. Collectively, our results indicate that at the stage of nascent polypeptides, polytopic membrane proteins are selected by SRP for co-translational membrane targeting, whereas secretory proteins are directed into the SecA/SecB-mediated post-translational targeting pathway by means of their preferential recognition by trigger factor.     

Export of beta-lactamase is independent of the signal recognition particle

In Escherichia coli, three different types of proteins engage the SecY translocon of the inner bacterial membrane for translocation or insertion: 1) polytopic membrane proteins that prior to their insertion into the membrane are targeted to the translocon using the bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor; 2) secretory proteins that are targeted to and translocated across the SecY translocon in a SecA- and SecB-dependent reaction; and 3) membrane proteins with large periplasmic domains, requiring SRP for targeting and SecA for the translocation of the periplasmic moiety. In addition to its role as a targeting device for membrane proteins, a function of the bacterial SRP in the export of SecB-independent secretory proteins has also been postulated. In particular, beta-lactamase, a hydrolytic enzyme responsible for cleavage of the beta-lactam ring containing antibiotics, is considered to be recognized and targeted by SRP. To examine the role of the SRP pathway in beta-lactamase targeting and export, we performed a detailed in vitro analysis. Chemical cross-linking and membrane binding assays did not reveal any significant interaction between SRP and beta-lactamase nascent chains. More importantly, membrane vesicles prepared from mutants lacking a functional SRP pathway did block the integration of SRP-dependent membrane proteins but supported the export of beta-lactamase in the same way as that of the SRP-independent protein OmpA. These data demonstrate that in contrast to previous results, the bacterial SRP is not involved in the export of beta-lactamase and further suggest that secretory proteins of Gram-negative bacteria in general are not substrates of SRP.     

SecA is not required for signal recognition particle-mediated targeting and initial membrane insertion of a nascent inner membrane protein.

In Escherichia coli, signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of inner membrane proteins has been described. In vitro cross-linking studies have demonstrated that short nascent chains exposing a highly hydrophobic targeting signal interact with the SRP. This SRP, assisted by its receptor, FtsY, mediates the transfer to a common translocation site in the inner membrane that contains SecA, SecG, and SecY. Here we describe a further in vitro reconstitution of SRP-mediated membrane insertion in which purified ribosome-nascent chain-SRP complexes are targeted to the purified SecYEG complex contained in proteoliposomes in a process that requires the SRP-receptor FtsY and GTP. We found that in this system SecA and ATP are dispensable for both the transfer of the nascent inner membrane protein FtsQ to SecY and its stable membrane insertion. Release of the SRP from nascent FtsQ also occurred in the absence of SecYEG complex indicating a functional interaction of FtsY with lipids. These data suggest that SRP/FtsY and SecB/SecA constitute distinct targeting routes.     

The Escherichia coli SRP and SecB targeting pathways converge at the translocon.

Two distinct protein targeting pathways can direct proteins to the Escherichia coli inner membrane. The Sec pathway involves the cytosolic chaperone SecB that binds to the mature region of pre-proteins. SecB targets the pre-protein to SecA that mediates pre-protein translocation through the SecYEG translocon. The SRP pathway is probably used primarily for the targeting and assembly of inner membrane proteins. It involves the signal recognition particle (SRP) that interacts with the hydrophobic targeting signal of nascent proteins. By using a protein cross-linking approach, we demonstrate here that the SRP pathway delivers nascent inner membrane proteins at the membrane. The SRP receptor FtsY, GTP and inner membranes are required for release of the nascent proteins from the SRP. Upon release of the SRP at the membrane, the targeted nascent proteins insert into a translocon that contains at least SecA, SecY and SecG. Hence, as appears to be the case for several other translocation systems, multiple targeting mechanisms deliver a variety of precursor proteins to a common membrane translocation complex of the E.coli inner membrane.     

Selective SecA association with signal sequences in ribosome-bound nascent chains: a potential role for SecA in ribosome targeting to the bacterial membrane

The role of SecA in selecting bacterial proteins for export was examined using a heterologous system that lacks endogenous SecA and other bacterial proteins. This approach allowed us to assess the interaction of SecA with ribosome-bound photoreactive nascent chains in the absence of trigger factor, SecB, Ffh (the bacterial protein component of the signal recognition particle), and the SecYEG translocon in the bacterial plasma membrane. In the absence of membranes, SecA photocross-linked efficiently to nascent translocation substrate OmpA in ribosome-nascent chain (RNC) complexes in an interaction that was independent of both ATP and SecB. However, no photocross-linking to a nascent membrane protein that is normally targeted by a signal recognition particle was observed. Modification of the signal sequence revealed that its affinity for SecA and Ffh varied inversely. Gel filtration showed that SecA binds tightly to both translating and non-translating ribosomes. When purified SecA.RNC complexes containing nascent OmpA were exposed to inner membrane vesicles lacking functional SecA, the nascent chains were successfully targeted to SecYEG translocons. However, purified RNCs lacking SecA were unable to target to the same membranes. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that cytosolic SecA participates in the selection of proteins for export by co-translationally binding to the signal sequences of non-membrane proteins and directing those nascent chains to the translocon.     

Signal Recognition Particle and SecA Cooperate during Export of Secretory Proteins with Highly Hydrophobic Signal Sequences

The Sec translocon of bacterial plasma membranes mediates the linear translocation of secretory proteins as well as the lateral integration of membrane proteins. Integration of many membrane proteins occurs co-translationally via the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of ribosome-associated nascent chains to the Sec translocon. In contrast, translocation of classical secretory proteins across the Sec translocon is a post-translational event requiring no SRP but the motor protein SecA. Secretory proteins were, however, reported to utilize SRP in addition to SecA, if the hydrophobicity of their signal sequences exceeds a certain threshold value. Here we have analyzed transport of this subgroup of secretory proteins across the Sec translocon employing an entirely defined in vitro system. We thus found SecA to be both necessary and sufficient for translocation of secretory proteins with hydrophobic signal sequences, whereas SRP and its receptor improved translocation efficiency. This SRP-mediated boost of translocation is likely due to the early capture of the hydrophobic signal sequence by SRP as revealed by site-specific photo cross-linking of ribosome nascent chain complexes.     

SecA is required for the insertion of inner membrane proteins targeted by the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle

Recent work has demonstrated that the signal recognition particle (SRP) is required for the efficient insertion of many proteins into the Escherichia coli inner membrane (IM). Based on an analogy to eukaryotic SRP, it is likely that bacterial SRP binds to inner membrane proteins (IMPs) co-translationally and then targets them to protein transport channels ("translocons"). Here we present evidence that SecA, which has previously been shown to facilitate the export of proteins targeted in a post-translational fashion, is also required for the membrane insertion of proteins targeted by SRP. The introduction of SecA mutations into strains that have modest SRP deficiencies produced a synthetic lethal effect, suggesting that SecA and SRP might function in the same biochemical pathway. Consistent with this explanation, depletion of SecA by inactivating a temperature-sensitive amber suppressor in a secAam strain completely blocked the membrane insertion of AcrB, a protein that is targeted by SRP. In the absence of substantial SecA, pulse-labeled AcrB was retained in the cytoplasm even after a prolonged chase period and was eventually degraded. Although protein export was also severely impaired by SecA depletion, the observation that more than 20% of the OmpA molecules were translocated properly showed that translocons were still active. Taken together, these results imply that SecA plays a much broader role in the transport of proteins across the E. coli IM than has been previously recognized.     

YidC, the Escherichia coli homologue of mitochondrial Oxa1p, is a component of the Sec translocase

In Escherichia coli, both secretory and inner membrane proteins initially are targeted to the core SecYEG inner membrane translocase. Previous work has also identified the peripherally associated SecA protein as well as the SecD, SecF and YajC inner membrane proteins as components of the translocase. Here, we use a cross-linking approach to show that hydrophilic portions of a co-translationally targeted inner membrane protein (FtsQ) are close to SecA and SecY, suggesting that insertion takes place at the SecA/Y interface. The hydrophobic FtsQ signal anchor sequence contacts both lipids and a novel 60 kDa translocase-associated component that we identify as YidC. YidC is homologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Oxa1p, which has been shown to function in a novel export pathway at the mitochondrial inner membrane. We propose that YidC is involved in the insertion of hydrophobic sequences into the lipid bilayer after initial recognition by the SecAYEG translocase.     

Dissecting the translocase and integrase functions of the Escherichia coli SecYEG translocon

Recent evidence suggests that in Escherichia coli, SecA/SecB and signal recognition particle (SRP) are constituents of two different pathways targeting secretory and inner membrane proteins to the SecYEG translocon of the plasma membrane. We now show that a secY mutation, which compromises a functional SecY-SecA interaction, does not impair the SRP-mediated integration of polytopic inner membrane proteins. Furthermore, under conditions in which the translocation of secretory proteins is strictly dependent on SecG for assisting SecA, the absence of SecG still allows polytopic membrane proteins to integrate at the wild-type level. These results indicate that SRP-dependent integration and SecA/SecB-mediated translocation do not only represent two independent protein delivery systems, but also remain mechanistically distinct processes even at the level of the membrane where they engage different domains of SecY and different components of the translocon. In addition, the experimental setup used here enabled us to demonstrate that SRP-dependent integration of a multispanning protein into membrane vesicles leads to a biologically active enzyme.     

Reconstitution of Sec-dependent membrane protein insertion: nascent FtsQ interacts with YidC in a SecYEG-dependent manner

The inner membrane protein YidC is associated with the preprotein translocase of Escherichia coli and contacts transmembrane segments of nascent inner membrane proteins during membrane insertion. YidC was purified to homogeneity and co-reconstituted with the SecYEG complex. YidC had no effect on the SecA/SecYEG-mediated translocation of the secretory protein proOmpA; however, using a crosslinking approach, the transmembrane segment of nascent FtsQ was found to gain access to YidC via SecY. These data indicate the functional reconstitution of the initial stages of YidC-dependent membrane protein insertion via the SecYEG complex.     

Membrane targeting of a bacterial virulence factor harbouring an extended signal peptide

Filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) is the major adhesin of Bordetella pertussis, the whooping cough agent. FHA is synthesized as a 367-kDa precursor harbouring a remarkably long signal peptide with an N-terminal extension that is conserved among related virulence proteins. FHA is secreted via the two-partner secretion pathway that involves transport across the outer membrane by a cognate transporter protein. Here we have analyzed the mechanism by which FHA is targeted to, and translocated across, the inner membrane. Studies were performed both in vitro using Escherichia coli inside-out inner membrane vesicles and in vivo by pulse-chase labelling of Bordetella pertussis cells. The data collectively indicate that like classical periplasmic and outer membrane proteins, FHA requires SecA and SecB for its export through the SecYEG translocon in the inner membrane. Although short nascent chains of FHA were found to cross-link to signal recognition particle (SRP), we did not obtain indication for an SRP-dependent, co-translational membrane targeting provoked by the FHA signal sequence. Our results rule out that the extended signal peptide of FHA determines a specific mode of membrane targeting but rather suggest that it might influence the export rate at the inner membrane.     

Membrane insertion of the mannitol permease of Escherichia coli occurs under conditions of impaired SecA function.

The membrane insertion of the mannitol permease (MtlA protein) of Escherichia coli, a polytopic cytoplasmic membrane protein possessing an uncleaved amphiphilic signal sequence, was studied using a cell-free protein synthesis system. The MtlA protein synthesized in the presence of inside-out cytoplasmic membrane vesicles was shown to insert into the membranes based on the following criteria: (a) co-sedimentation of the majority of the MtlA protein with the vesicles; (b) selective extraction of the membrane-associated MtlA by doxycholate but not by urea treatment; and (c) protease resistance of a defined MtlA fragment observed exclusively in the presence of membranes. Post-translational addition of membrane vesicles allowed membrane association of MtlA but did not allow efficient integration. In cell-free systems having reduced levels of the export factors SecA and SecB and exhibiting defective translocation of preOmpA and preLamB, insertion of the in vitro synthesized MtlA apparently occurred normally. In contrast, when membranes from the secY24ts mutant or trypsin-treated membranes were used, insertion of MtlA was reduced. In vivo experiments monitoring the permease activity of MtlA in the secA and secY mutants supported the conclusions of the in vitro results. Thus, the insertion of MtlA is essentially SecA- and SecB-independent but may be dependent on SecY and/or an as yet unidentified membrane protein. The requirements for the insertion of the mannitol permease are therefore clearly different from those for the translocation of most proteins having a cleavable hydrophobic signal sequence.     

Translocation of secretory proteins across the microsomal membrane occurs through an environment accessible to aqueous perturbants

We have characterized the association of a nascent secretory protein with the microsomal membrane at two distinct stages in cell-free synthesis and translocation. Stage one corresponded to a nascent chain of approximately 70 residues generated via elongation arrest by the signal recognition particle (SRP). Binding to microsomal membranes occurred independently of chain elongation and required SRP receptor. Following binding, the 70-mer remained attached to the membrane after extraction of the ribosome. However, protein denaturants (4 M urea or alkaline pH) extracted the 70-mer from the membrane. Stage two of synthesis corresponded to nascent chains of approximately 158 residues generated by oligonucleotide-mediated hybrid arrest of translation. Again, these partially translocated nascent chains were extracted by 4 M urea. Therefore, the initial interaction of the signal sequence with the membrane as well as subsequent chain conductance occur in a microenvironment that is accessible to aqueous reagents. Thus, both processes probably require integral membrane proteins.     

Sequence-specific interactions of nascent Escherichia coli polypeptides with trigger factor and signal recognition particle

As nascent polypeptides exit the ribosomal tunnel they immediately associate with chaperones, folding catalysts, and targeting factors. These interactions are decisive for the future conformation and destination of the protein that is being synthesized. Using Escherichia coli as a model organism, we have systematically analyzed how the earliest contacts of nascent polypeptides with cytosolic factors depend on the nature and future destination of the emerging sequence using a photo cross-linking approach. Together, the data suggest that the chaperone trigger factor is adjacent to emerging sequences by default, consistent with both its placement near the nascent chain exit site and its cellular abundance. The signal recognition particle (SRP) effectively competes the contact with TF when a signal anchor (SA) sequence of a nascent inner membrane protein appears outside the ribosome. The SRP remains in contact with the SA and downstream sequences during further synthesis of approximately 30 amino acids. The contact with trigger factor is then restored unless another transmembrane segment reinitiates SRP binding. Importantly and in contrast to published data, the SRP appears perfectly capable of distinguishing SA sequences from signal sequences in secretory proteins at this early stage in biogenesis.     

Involvement of PpiD in Sec-dependent protein translocation

The periplasmic space in between the inner and outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria contains numerous chaperones that are involved in the biogenesis and rescue of extra-cytosolic proteins. In contrast to most of those periplasmic chaperones, PpiD is anchored by an N-terminal transmembrane domain within the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. There it is located in close proximity to the SecY subunit of the SecYEG translocon, which is the primary transporter for secretory and membrane proteins. By site-specific cross-linking we now found the periplasmic domain of PpiD also in close vicinity to the SecG subunit of the Sec translocon and we provide the first direct evidence for a functional cooperation between PpiD and the Sec translocon. Thus we demonstrate that PpiD stimulates in a concentration-dependent manner the translocation of two different secretory proteins into proteoliposomes that had been reconstituted with sub-saturating amounts of SecYEG. In addition we found ribosome-associated nascent chains of a secretory protein stalled at SecY also being in close contact to PpiD. Collectively these results suggest that PpiD plays a role in clearing the Sec translocon of newly translocated secretory proteins thereby improving the overall translocation efficiency. Consistent with this conclusion we demonstrate that PpiD contributes to the efficient detachment of newly secreted OmpA from the inner membrane and in doing so, seems to cooperate in a hierarchical manner with other periplasmic chaperones such as SurA, DegP, and Skp.     

SecYEG proteoliposomes catalyze the Deltaphi-dependent membrane insertion of FtsQ

In Escherichia coli, the insertion of most inner membrane proteins is mediated by the Sec translocase. Ribosome-bound nascent chains of Sec-dependent inner membrane proteins are targeted to the SecYEG complex via the signal recognition particle pathway. We now demonstrate that the signal recognition particle-dependent co-translational membrane targeting and membrane insertion of FtsQ can be reconstituted with proteoliposomes containing purified SecYEG. SecA and a transmembrane electrical potential are essential for the translocation of the large periplasmic domain of FtsQ, whereas co-reconstituted YidC has an inhibitory effect. These data demonstrate that membrane protein insertion can be reconstituted with a minimal set of purified Sec components.     

Targeting and insertion of heterologous membrane proteins in E. coli

Membrane targeting and insertion of the archaeal Halobacter halobium proton pump bacterioopsin (Bop) and the human melanocortin 4 receptor (MC(4)R) were studied in vitro, using E. coli components for protein synthesis, membrane targeting and insertion. These heterologous proteins are targeted to E. coli membranes in a signal recognition particle (SRP) dependent manner and inserted into the membrane co-translationally. Furthermore, we demonstrate that nascent chains of Bop and MC(4)R first interact with SecY and then with YidC as they move through the translocon. Our results suggest that the initial stages of membrane targeting and insertion of heterologous proteins in E. coli proceed by the pathway used for native E. coli membrane proteins. No significant pausing of protein elongation was observed in the presence of E. coli SRP, in line with the suggestion that translational arrest requires an Alu domain, which is absent in SRP from E. coli.     

Early encounters of a nascent membrane protein: specificity and timing of contacts inside and outside the ribosome

An unbiased photo-cross-linking approach was used to probe the "molecular path" of a growing nascent Escherichia coli inner membrane protein (IMP) from the peptidyl transferase center to the surface of the ribosome. The nascent chain was initially in proximity to the ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 and subsequently contacted L23, which is indicative of progression through the ribosome via the main ribosomal tunnel. The signal recognition particle (SRP) started to interact with the nascent IMP and to target the ribosome-nascent chain complex to the Sec-YidC complex in the inner membrane when maximally half of the transmembrane domain (TM) was exposed from the ribosomal exit. The combined data suggest a flexible tunnel that may accommodate partially folded nascent proteins and parts of the SRP and SecY. Intraribosomal contacts of the nascent chain were not influenced by the presence of a functional TM in the ribosome.     

Basic amino acids in a distinct subset of signal peptides promote interaction with the signal recognition particle

Previous studies have demonstrated that signal peptides bind to the signal recognition particle (SRP) primarily via hydrophobic interactions with the 54-kDa protein subunit. The crystal structure of the conserved SRP ribonucleoprotein core, however, raised the surprising possibility that electrostatic interactions between basic amino acids in signal peptides and the phosphate backbone of SRP RNA may also play a role in signal sequence recognition. To test this possibility we examined the degree to which basic amino acids in a signal peptide influence the targeting of two Escherichia coli proteins, maltose binding protein and OmpA. Whereas both proteins are normally targeted to the inner membrane by SecB, we found that replacement of their native signal peptides with another moderately hydrophobic but unusually basic signal peptide (DeltaEspP) rerouted them into the SRP pathway. Reduction in either the net positive charge or the hydrophobicity of the DeltaEspP signal peptide decreased the effectiveness of SRP recognition. A high degree of hydrophobicity, however, compensated for the loss of basic residues and restored SRP binding. Taken together, the data suggest that the formation of salt bridges between SRP RNA and basic amino acids facilitates the binding of a distinct subset of signal peptides whose hydrophobicity falls slightly below a threshold level.     

Generalized transposon shuttle mutagenesis in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a method for isolating epithelial cell invasion-defective mutants

Hybrid genes were constructed to express bifunctional hybrid proteins in which staphyloccal nuclease A with or without an amino-terminai OmpA signal sequence was fused with TEM β-lactamase (at the carboxyl terminal side) using the signal peptide of the major outer membrane lipoprotein of Escherichia coli as an internal linker. The hybrid proteins were found to be inserted in the membrane. Orientation of the hybrid protein with the OmpA signal peptide showed that the nuclease was translocated into the periplasm and the β-lactamase remained in the cytoplasm. This indicates that the cleavable OmpA signal peptide served as a secretory signal for nuclease and the internal lipoprotein signal served as the transmembrane anchor, in the absence of the OmpA signal sequence the topology of the hybrid protein was reversed indicating that the internal lipoprotein signal peptide initially served as the signal peptide for the secretion of the carboxy terminal β-lactamase domain across the membrane and subsequently as a membrane anchoring signal. The role of charged amino acids in the translocation and transmembrane orientation of membrane proteins was also analysed by introducing charged amino acids to either or both sides of the internal lipoprotein signal sequence in the bifunctional hybrid proteins in the absence of the amino-terminal signal sequence. Introduction of two lysine residues at the carboxy-terminal side of the internal signal sequence reversed the topology of the transmembrane protein by translocating the aminoterminal nuclease domain across the membrane, leaving the carboxyl terminal β-actamase domain in the cytoplasm. When three more lysine residues were added to the amino-terminal side of the internal signal sequence of the same construct the membrane topology flipped back to the original orientation. A similar reversion of the topology could be obtained by introducing negatively charged residues at the amino-terminal side of the internal signal sequence. Present results demonstrate for the first time that a bifunctional transmembrane protein can be engineered to assume either of the two opposite orientations and that charge balance around the transmembrane domain is a major factor in controlling the topology of a transmembrane protein.