The position of the Arthropoda in the phylogenetic system

Traditionally, Panarthropoda (Euarthropoda, Onychophora, Tardigrada) are regarded as being closely related to Annelida in a taxon Articulata, but this is not supported by molecular analyses. Comparisons of gene sequences suggest that all molting taxa (Panarthropoda, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera) are related in a monophyletic taxon Ecdysozoa. An examination of the characters supporting Articulata reveals that only segmentation with a teloblastic segment formation and the existence of segmental coelomic cavities with nephridia support the Articulata, whereas all other characters are modified or reduced in the panarthropod lineage. Another set of characters is presented that supports the monophyly of Ecdysozoa: molting under influence of ecdysteroid hormones, loss of locomotory cilia, trilayered cuticle and the formation of the epicuticle from the tips of epidermal microvilli. Comparative morphology suggests Gastrotricha as the sister group of Ecdysozoa with the synapomorphies: triradiate muscular sucking pharynx and terminal mouth opening. Thus there are morphological characters that support Articulata, but molecular as well as morphological data advocate Ecdysozoa. Comparison of both hypotheses should prompt further thorough and targeted investigations. J. Morphol. 238:263–285, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The Articulata hypothesis – or what is a segment?

The long held view that annelids and arthropods are closely related (Articulata) has been challenged recently by phylogenetic analyses using molecular data. The outcome of these studies is a clade of moulting animals (Ecdysozoa) comprising arthropods and some taxa of the nemathelminth worms. Monophyly of the Ecdysozoa has not yet been shown convincingly on morphological evidence, but is strongly supported by molecular data. The implication of the Ecdysozoa hypothesis is that the type of segmentation found in annelids and arthropods must be either convergent or an ancestral feature of protostomes or even bilaterians. The present review discusses aspects of segmentation in annelids and arthropods at the genetic, cellular, morphogenetic and morphological levels. Based on numerous similarities not shared with other bilaterian taxa it is suggested that segmentation of annelids and arthropods is homologous and apomorphic for a monophyletic Articulata. However, the challenge provided by the molecular analyses should stimulate research programmes gaining more data such as on additional genes, cleavage patterns, molecular developmental biology, and the comparison of nervous systems at the level of single neurons.     

Ecdysozoa: The Relationship between Cycloneuralia and Panarthropoda

The hypothesis that molting protostomes such as nematodes and arthropods form a monophyletic group known as Ecdysozoa is directly opposed to Articulata, in which some segmented protostomes such as annelids and arthropods form a monophyletic taxon. Ultrastructural and cladistic studies have led to the widely accepted hypothesis that nematodes belong among the protostomes. While early molecular studies suggested that nematodes were basal triploblasts, more recent molecular evidence suggests that this was an artifact of ‘long branch attraction’ and 18S rRNA gene, total evidence and hox gene studies all support the placement of nematodes within Ecdysozoa. The branching pattern within Ecdysozoa has been difficult to elucidate, but it now appears that priapulids and kinorhynchs form the earliest branching clade, followed by nematodes + nematomorphs, and finally the panarthropods. This suggests that Cycloneuralia is paraphyletic and that arthropods are the most derived of the ecdysozoans.     

On quality of evidence in phylogeny reconstruction: a reply to Zrzavý's defence of the 'Ecdysozoa' hypothesis

Zrzavý’s arguments against the critical analyses of data supporting the Ecdysozoa hypothesis (Wägele et al., J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 37, 211–223, 1999) are discussed. Zrzavý does not understand that the same basic principle of a priori weighting can be applied to sequence data as well as to morphological characters. Quality of evidence is the same as probability of homology, which is estimated from the number of discernible identical details. In sequences it is the number of identical nucleotides. Spectral analyses, dismissed by Zrzavý, visualize patterns of putative homologies present in alignments and also the number of positions supporting splits by chance alone. In cases in which old phylogenetic signals for a given monophylum are eroded in a gene, plesiomorphies and chance patterns will have strong influence on tree topologies and spectra. If plesiomorphies are a cause of errors, the addition of taxa that shorten internal branches is a remedy, although, in many cases such taxa may be extinct. The place of a priori estimations of data quality in a sequence of steps necessary for a phylogenetic analysis is shown. Morphological complexity is used as a proxy for a complex genetic basis and is used as a major criterion to compare characters of the Ecdysozoa and the Articulata. The details associated with the character ‘complex cuticle’ are discussed. Neither moulting nor the known components of the cuticle are novelties occurring only in Ecdysozoa. A published total evidence analysis is used to show that the number of coded characters does not necessarily reflect the quality of the data set. Zrzavý’s misunderstanding of the role of evolutionary scenarios is clarified and the importance of the use of additional biological data for plausibility arguments is explained. Plausibility arguments in favour of the Articulata hypothesis rely on facts found in functional morphology and in the fossil record. Zrzavý’s critique follows the actual mainstream but does not uncover logical mistakes or erroneous data analyses in the work of 86 . It is concluded that the Articulata hypothesis is a well‐founded alternative to the Ecdysozoa; it is based on much better morphological evidence and supported by plausibility arguments that currently do not exist for the Ecdysozoa.     

Proposing a solution to the Articulata–Ecdysozoa controversy

Recent studies of animal radiation agree on monophyly of the Bilateria, but there is no consensus about the early radiation of the group. Protostomia and Deuterostomia are usually recognized, with two competing theories regarding the division of the Protostomia: one divides them into Spiralia and Cycloneuralia, the other into Lophotrochozoa and Ecdysozoa. The main discrepancy concerns the Arthropoda, which are placed with the Articulata within the Spiralia by the first group, and with the Cycloneuralia within the Ecdysozoa by the second. Here I propose that this discrepancy can be resolved by regarding the Ecdysozoa as the sister group of the Annelida within the Articulata. This implies that segmentation has been lost in phyla such as Nematoda and Priapula, but the Kinorhyncha may show a 'reduced segmentation' with serially arranged muscles associated with a ringed cuticle. Morphological, palaeontological and molecular implications of this theory are discussed. While many morphological and palaeontological data can be interpreted in accordance with the theory, the molecular data remain inconclusive.     

The evolution of the Ecdysozoa

Ecdysozoa is a clade composed of eight phyla: the arthropods, tardigrades and onychophorans that share segmentation and appendages and the nematodes, nematomorphs, priapulids, kinorhynchs and loriciferans, which are worms with an anterior proboscis or introvert. Ecdysozoa contains the vast majority of animal species and there is a great diversity of body plans among both living and fossil members. The monophyly of the clade has been called into question by some workers based on analyses of whole genome datasets. We review the evidence that now conclusively supports the unique origin of these phyla. Relationships within Ecdysozoa are also controversial and we discuss the molecular and morphological evidence for a number of monophyletic groups within this superphylum.     

Ecdysozoa versus Articulata: clades, artifacts, prejudices

The claim that monophyly of the Ecdysozoa is caused by chance similarities in 18S rDNA sequences ( Wägele et al., J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 37, 211–223, 1999 ) is re-analysed from the cladistic point of view. It is shown that the molecular characters supporting the Ecdysozoa do not behave as 'noisy' in empirical studies that use the sensitivity analysis and character congruence approaches. The 'anti-noise' methodology proposed by Wägele et al. (1999) is unable to identify true misinformative data. The monophyly of the Articulata (= Annelida + Panarthropoda), proposed by Wägele et al. (1999) , is contradicted by all molecular data that support either Ecdysozoa (including Panarthropoda), or Lophotrochozoa (including Annelida), or usually both.     

Systematic searches for molecular synapomorphies in model metazoan genomes give some support for Ecdysozoa after accounting for the idiosyncrasies of Caenorhabditis elegans

There has been broad acceptance among evolutionary biologists of the Ecdysozoa hypothesis that, based principally on molecular phylogenetic studies of small and large subunit ribosomal RNA sequences, postulates a close relationship between molting taxa such as arthropods and nematodes. On the other hand, recent studies of as many as 100 additional genes do not support the Ecdysozoa hypothesis and instead favor the older Coelomata hypothesis that groups the coelomate arthropods with the coelomate vertebrates to the exclusion of the nematodes. Here, exploiting completely sequenced genomes, we examined this question using cladistic analyses of the phylogenetic distribution of 1712 orthologous genes and 2906 protein domain combinations; we found stronger support for the Coelomata hypothesis than for the Ecdysozoa hypothesis. However, although arrived at by considering very large data sets, we show that this conclusion is unreliable, biased toward grouping arthropods with chordates by systematic high rate of character loss in the nematode. When we addressed this problem, we found slightly more support for Ecdysozoa than for Coelomata. Our identification of this systematic bias even when using entire genomes has important implications for future phylogenetic studies. We conclude that the results from the intensively sampled ribosomal RNA genes supporting the Ecdysozoa hypothesis provide the most credible current estimates of metazoan phylogeny.     

Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes

Although the small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene is widely used in the molecular systematics, few large-subunit (LSU) rRNA gene sequences are known from protostome animals, and the value of the LSU gene for invertebrate systematics has not been explored. The goal of this study is to test whether combined LSU and SSU rRNA gene sequences support the division of protostomes into Ecdysozoa (molting forms) and Lophotrochozoa, as was proposed by Aguinaldo et al. (1997) (Nature 387:489) based on SSU rRNA sequences alone. Nearly complete LSU gene sequences were obtained, and combined LSU + SSU sequences were assembled, for 15 distantly related protostome taxa plus five deuterostome outgroups. When the aligned LSU + SSU sequences were analyzed by tree-building methods (minimum evolution analysis of LogDet-transformed distances, maximum likelihood, and maximum parsimony) and by spectral analysis of LogDet distances, both Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa were indeed strongly supported (e.g., bootstrap values >90%), with higher support than from the SSU sequences alone. Furthermore, with the LogDet-based methods, the LSU + SSU sequences resolved some accepted subgroups within Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa (e.g., the polychaete sequence grouped with the echiuran, and the annelid sequences grouped with the mollusc and lophophorates)-subgroups that SSU-based studies do not reveal. Also, the mollusc sequence grouped with the sequences from lophophorates (brachiopod and phoronid). Like SSU sequences, our LSU + SSU sequences contradict older hypotheses that grouped annelids with arthropods as Articulata, that said flatworms and nematodes were basal bilateralians, and considered lophophorates, nemerteans, and chaetognaths to be deuterostomes. The position of chaetognaths within protostomes remains uncertain: our chaetognath sequence associated with that of an onychophoran, but this was unstable and probably artifactual. Finally, the benefits of combining LSU with SSU sequences for phylogenetic analyses are discussed: LSU adds signal, it can be used at lower taxonomic levels, and its core region is easy to align across distant taxa-but its base frequencies tend to be nonstationary across such taxa. We conclude that molecular systematists should use combined LSU + SSU rRNA genes rather than SSU alone.     

The complete mitochondrial genome of the onychophoran Epiperipatus biolleyi reveals a unique transfer RNA set and provides further support for the ecdysozoa hypothesis

Onychophora (velvet worms) play a crucial role in current discussions on position of arthropods. The ongoing Articulata/Ecdysozoa debate is in need of additional ground pattern characters for Panarthropoda (Arthropoda, Tardigrada, and Onychophora). Hence, Onychophora is an important outgroup taxon in resolving the relationships among arthropods, irrespective of whether morphological or molecular data are used. To date, there has been a noticeable lack of mitochondrial genome data from onychophorans. Here, we present the first complete mitochondrial genome sequence of an onychophoran, Epiperipatus biolleyi (Peripatidae), which shows several characteristic features. Specifically, the gene order is considerably different from that in other arthropods and other bilaterians. In addition, there is a lack of 9 tRNA genes usually present in bilaterian mitochondrial genomes. All these missing tRNAs have anticodon sequences corresponding to 4-fold degenerate codons, whereas the persisting 13 tRNAs all have anticodons pairing with 2-fold degenerate codons. Sequence-based phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial protein-coding genes provides a robust support for a clade consisting of Onychophora, Priapulida, and Arthropoda, which confirms the Ecdysozoa hypothesis. However, resolution of the internal ecdysozoan relationships suffers from a cluster of long-branching taxa (including Nematoda and Platyhelminthes) and a lack of data from Tardigrada and further nemathelminth taxa in addition to nematodes and priapulids.     

Old trees, new trees--is there any progress?

The amount of comparative data for phylogenetic analyses is constantly increasing. Data come from different directions such as morphology, molecular genetics, developmental biology and paleontology. With the increasing diversity of data and of analytical tools, the number of competing hypotheses on phylogenetic relationships rises, too. The choice of the phylogenetic tree as a basis for the interpretation of new data is important, because different trees will support different evolutionary interpretations of the data investigated. I argue here that, although many problematic aspects exist, there are several phylogenetic relationships that are supported by the majority of analyses and may be regarded as something like a robust backbone. This accounts, for example, for the monophyly of Metazoa, Bilateria, Deuterostomia, Protostomia (= Gastroneuralia), Gnathifera, Spiralia, Trochozoa and Arthropoda and probably also for the branching order of diploblastic taxa (“Porifera”, Trichoplax adhaerens, Cnidaria and Ctenophora). Along this “backbone”, there are several problematic regions, where either monophyly is questionable and/or where taxa “rotate” in narrow regions of the tree. This is illustrated exemplified by the probable paraphyly of Porifera and the phylogenetic relationships of basal spiralian taxa. Two problems span wider regions of the tree: the position of Arthropoda either as the sister taxon of Annelida (= Articulata) or of Cycloneuralia (= Ecdysozoa) and the position of tentaculate taxa either as sister taxa of Deuterostomia (= Radialia) or within the taxon Spiralia. The backbone makes it possible to develop a basic understanding of the evolution of genes, molecules and structures in metazoan animals.     

Fixed,free, and fixed: The fickle phylogeny of extant Crinoidea (Echinodermata) and their Permian–Triassic origin

Although the status of Crinoidea (sea lilies and featherstars) as sister group to all other living echinoderms is well-established, relationships among crinoids, particularly extant forms, are debated. All living species are currently placed in Articulata, which is generally accepted as the only crinoid group to survive the Permian–Triassic extinction event. Recent classifications have recognized five major extant taxa: Isocrinida, Hyocrinida, Bourgueticrinina, Comatulidina and Cyrtocrinida, plus several smaller groups with uncertain taxonomic status, e.g., Guillecrinus, Proisocrinus and Caledonicrinus. Here we infer the phylogeny of extant Crinoidea using three mitochondrial genes and two nuclear genes from 59 crinoid terminals that span the majority of extant crinoid diversity. Although there is poor support for some of the more basal nodes, and some tree topologies varied with the data used and mode of analysis, we obtain several robust results. Cyrtocrinida, Hyocrinida, Isocrinida are all recovered as clades, but two stalked crinoid groups, Bourgueticrinina and Guillecrinina, nest among the featherstars, lending support to an argument that they are paedomorphic forms. Hence, they are reduced to families within Comatulida. Proisocrinus is clearly shown to be part of Isocrinida, and Caledonicrinus may not be a bourgueticrinid. Among comatulids, tree topologies show little congruence with current taxonomy, indicating that much systematic revision is required. Relaxed molecular clock analyses with eight fossil calibration points recover Articulata with a median date to the most recent common ancestor at 231–252 mya in the Middle to Upper Triassic. These analyses tend to support the hypothesis that the group is a radiation from a small clade that passed through the Permian–Triassic extinction event rather than several lineages that survived. Our tree topologies show various scenarios for the evolution of stalks and cirri in Articulata, so it is clear that further data and taxon sampling are needed to recover a more robust phylogeny of the group.     

Molecular cloning and sequencing of the Na+/K+-ATPase α-subunit of the medical leech Hirudo medicinalis (Annelida) – implications for modelling protostomian evolution

Within the past few years, the phylogenetic tree is discussed controversially regarding the position of the different bilaterian groups. There are two varying views of evolution: the classical one based on morphological structures where the annelids and arthropods are combined in the group of Articulata, and a new hypothesis based on molecular data sets, which divides the protostomian groups in Ecdysozoa (e.g. arthropods, and nematodes) and Lophotrochozoa (e.g. annelids, molluscs, and platyhelminthes). The Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase is a highly conserved protein and fulfils a very important role in physiology and maintaining the homeostasis of cells and can be found in almost all eukaryotic animals. Due to its similar molecular structure throughout the animal kingdom the Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase is an excellent marker for phylogenetic studies. Here we report the molecular cloning, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) of the medical leech Hirudo medicinalis . The cloned cDNA codes for a polypeptide of 1022 amino acids and possesses a predicted molecular mass of 113.33 kDa. Phylogenetic analysis of the complete Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase α -subunit of H. medicinalis and sequence data from other Na⁺/K⁺-ATPases supports the previously developed 'Ecdysozoa concept' with high posterior probabilities. A common clade comprising annelids and platyhelminthes can be defined, whereas nematodes are in a basal position at the arthropod stem line.     

Testing the new animal phylogeny: a phylum level molecular analysis of the animal kingdom

The new animal phylogeny inferred from ribosomal genes some years ago has prompted a number of radical rearrangements of the traditional, morphology based metazoan tree. The two main bilaterian clades, Deuterostomia and Protostomia, find strong support, but the protostomes consist of two sister groups, Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa, not seen in morphology based trees. Although widely accepted, not all recent molecular phylogenetic analyses have supported the tripartite structure of the new animal phylogeny. Furthermore, even if the small ribosomal subunit (SSU) based phylogeny is correct, there is a frustrating lack of resolution of relationships between the phyla that make up the three clades of this tree. To address this issue, we have assembled a dataset including a large number of aligned sequence positions as well as a broad sampling of metazoan phyla. Our dataset consists of sequence data from ribosomal and mitochondrial genes combined with new data from protein coding genes (5139 amino acid and 3524 nucleotide positions in total) from 37 representative taxa sampled across the Metazoa. Our data show strong support for the basic structure of the new animal phylogeny as well as for the Mandibulata including Myriapoda. We also provide some resolution within the Lophotrochozoa, where we confirm support for a monophyletic clade of Echiura, Sipuncula and Annelida and surprising evidence of a close relationship between Brachiopoda and Nemertea.     

Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida,Cycliophora, Plathelminthes,and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology

Triploblastic relationships were examined in the light of molecular and morphological evidence. Representatives for all triploblastic "phyla" (except Loricifera) were represented by both sources of phylogenetic data. The 18S ribosomal (rDNA) sequence data for 145 terminal taxa and 276 morphological characters coded for 36 supraspecific taxa were combined in a total evidence regime to determine the most consistent picture of triploblastic relationships for these data. Only triploblastic taxa are used to avoid rooting with distant outgroups, which seems to happen because of the extreme distance that separates diploblastic from triploblastic taxa according to the 18S rDNA data. Multiple phylogenetic analyses performed with variable analysis parameters yield largely inconsistent results for certain groups such as Chaetognatha, Acoela, and Nemertodermatida. A normalized incongruence length metric is used to assay the relative merit of the multiple analyses. The combined analysis having the least character incongruence yields the following scheme of relationships of four main clades: (1) Deuterostomia [((Echinodermata + Enteropneusta) (Cephalochordata (Urochordata + Vertebrata)))]; (2) Ecdysozoa [(((Priapulida + Kinorhyncha) (Nematoda + Nematomorpha)) ((Onychophora + Tardigrada) Arthropoda))]; (3) Trochozoa [((Phoronida + Brachiopoda) (Entoprocta (Nemertea (Sipuncula (Mollusca (Pogonophora (Echiura + Annelida)))))))]; and (4) Platyzoa [((Gnathostomulida (Cycliophora + Syndermata)) (Gastrotricha + Plathelminthes))]. Chaetognatha, Nemertodermatida, and Bryozoa cannot be assigned to any one of these four groups. For the first time, a data analysis recognizes a clade of acoelomates, the Platyzoa (sensu Cavalier-Smith, Biol. Rev. 73:203-266, 1998). Other relationships that corroborate some morphological analyses are the existence of a clade that groups Gnathostomulida + Syndermata (= Gnathifera), which is expanded to include the enigmatic phylum Cycliophora, as sister group to Syndermata.     

The multimeric beta-thymosin found in nematodes and arthropods is not a synapomorphy of the Ecdysozoa

The Ecdysozoa hypothesis proposes a clade of animals including arthropods and nematodes that share the characteristic of periodic molting or ecdysis. The original evidence supporting this hypothesis came from molecular phylogenies based on ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Contrary evidence has come from studies of multiple protein coding genes. One of the most convincing bits of supporting evidence for this theory has been the observation of an unusual multimeric form of the beta-thymosin gene in the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans where, in other metazoans that had been studied, a monomeric form has been found. Here I show that recently deposited sequence data reveal that the multimeric form is in fact a characteristic of all major subdivisions of the Metazoa. The multimeric form is present in a deuterostome, Ciona intestinalis, a lophotrochozoan, Hermissenda crassicornis, and in the ecdysozoans and also exists outside the Metazoa in a fungus. The presence of the multimeric form in nematodes and arthropods, therefore, although not contradicting the Ecdysozoa hypothesis, gives it no support. The absence of the monomeric form in the completely sequenced flies and nematodes may suggest they are linked but, lacking the complete genomes of other ecdysozoans, proving its total absence from the Ecdysozoa is not possible. Furthermore, the absence of the monomeric form from the genome of the deuterostome Ciona suggests that the absence of this character is an unreliable indicator of relationships.     

Bilaterian Phylogeny Based on Analyses of a Region of the Sodium–Potassium ATPase β-Subunit Gene

Molecular investigations of deep-level relationships within and among the animal phyla have been hampered by a lack of slowly evolving genes that are amenable to study by molecular systematists. To provide new data for use in deep-level metazoan phylogenetic studies, primers were developed to amplify a 1.3-kb region of the subunit of the nuclear-encoded sodium–potassium ATPase gene from 31 bilaterians representing several phyla. Maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analyses of these sequences (combined with ATPase sequences for 23 taxa downloaded from GenBank) yield congruent trees that corroborate recent findings based on analyses of other data sets (e.g., the 18S ribosomal RNA gene). The ATPase-based trees support monophyly for several clades (including Lophotrochozoa, a form of Ecdysozoa, Vertebrata, Mollusca, Bivalvia, Gastropoda, Arachnida, Hexapoda, Coleoptera, and Diptera) but do not support monophyly for Deuterostomia, Arthropoda, or Nemertea. Parametric bootstrapping tests reject monophyly for Arthropoda and Nemertea but are unable to reject deuterostome monophyly. Overall, the sodium–potassium ATPase -subunit gene appears to be useful for deep-level studies of metazoan phylogeny.     

A combined approach to the phylogeny of Cephalopoda (Mollusca)

Cephalopoda represents a highly diverse group of molluscs, ranging in habitat from coastal regions to deep benthic waters. While cephalopods remain at the forefront of modern biology, in providing insight into fields such as neurobiology and population genetics, little is known about the relationships within the group. This study provides a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Cephalopoda (Mollusca) using a combination of molecular and morphological data. Four loci (three nuclear 18S rRNA, fragments of 28S rRNA and histone H3 and one mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) were combined with 101 morphological characters to test the relationships of 60 species of cephalopods, with emphasis within Decabrachia (squids and cuttlefishes). Individual and combined data sets were analyzed using the direct optimization method, with parsimony as the optimality criterion. Analyses were repeated for 12 different parameter sets accounting for a range of indel/change and transversion/transition cost ratios. Most analyses support the monophyly of Cephalopoda, Nautiloidea, Coleoidea and Decabrachia, however, the monophyly of Octobrachia was refuted due to the lack of support for a Cirroctopoda + Octopoda group. When analyzing all molecular evidence in combination and for total evidence analyses, Vampyromorpha formed the sister group to Decabrachia under the majority of parameters, while morphological data and some individual data sets supported a sister relationship between Vampyromorpha and Octobrachia. Within Decabrachia, a relationship between the sepioids Idiosepiida, Sepiida, Sepiolida and the teuthid Loliginidae was supported. Spirulida fell within the teuthid group in most analyses, further rendering Teuthida paraphyletic. Relationships within Decabrachia and specifically Oegopsida were found to be highly parameter‐dependent. © The Willi Hennig Society 2004.     

Tardigrades — Are They Really Miniaturized Dwarfs?

Tardigrades are animals of small body size which is often regarded to be a secondary phenomenon. This interpretation makes sense in the traditional concept that tardigrades are closely related to Onychophora, Euarthropoda and Annelida. A large body size in the ancestor of this common taxon (Articulata) is probable. Small size and the absence of organs such as a dorsal heart, segmental coelomic cavities and metanephridia must then be interpreted as derived in tardigrades. However, when Cycloneuralia are taken as an outgroup instead of Annelida (taxon Ecdysozoa), an interpretation of small body size as a primary feature is plausible. This also accounts for the absence of heart, coelom and nephridia.The choice of outgroup influences hypotheses about sister-group relationships within Panarthropoda, with either Onychophora (Articulata-concept) or Tardigrada (Ecdysozoa-concept) being basal.