Alternative forms of competition and predation dramatically affect habitat selection under foraging--predation-risk trade-offs

Habitat selection under foraging—predation-risk trade-offshas been a frequent topic of interest to theoretical behavioraland evolutionary ecologists. However, most habitat selectionmodels assume that individuals compete exploitatively for resourcesand that predation is either density independent or dilutedcompletely by competitor number, despite empirical evidencethat other forms of competition and predation also occur innature. I developed an individual-based model for studyingthe effects of alternative forms of competition and predationon the process of habitat selection under foraging—predation-risktrade-offs. To make the model more relevant to natural populations,I assumed that individuals vary continuously in traits relatedto competitive ability and vulnerability to predation and allowedresources and predators to be distributed across more than twohabitats. The results of my investigation demonstrate thatthe predicted pattern of habitat selection can be affecteddramatically by the form predation is assumed to take. Whenpredation is density dependent or frequency dependent, individualswill tend to be distributed across habitats according to theirabsolute vulnerability to predation. In contrast, when predationis density dependent or vulnerability dependent, individualswill tend to segregate by competitive ability. Whether oneassumes that individuals compete for resources via exploitationor interference also influences the predicted pattern of habitatselection. In general, interference competition results in amore even distribution of competitors across habitats.     

Co-evolution of seed size and seed predation

Using the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) approach in a model for the co-evolution of seed size and seed predation, I show that seed size variation within individual plants is favoured if there is a trade-off in the predator's attack rate for different seed sizes. A single seed size is not evolutionarily stable because a predator that is optimally adapted to one particular seed size cannot prevent invasion by plants with a different seed size. The model generates the following predictions. The ESS consists of a continuous range of seed sizes. Small seeds tend to be attacked more frequently than big seeds. Plants with many resources and plants with low (frequency-independent) juvenile mortality have more variable seeds than plants with few resources and a high juvenile mortality. Seed size variation is higher in fluctuating populations regulated by seed predation alone than in stable populations (partially) regulated by seedling competition. Predator searching behaviour does not directly affect the ESS seed size range, but may have an indirect effect by affecting population stability or the significance of seedling competition as a population regulating mechanism. Moreover, seed size distributions are found to be more skewed in favour of small seeds if predation is spatially non-uniform than if predation is more even. Application of the model to systems of several co-evolving plant and predator species is discussed.     

Impact of overgrazing on seed predation by rodents in the Thar desert,northwestern India

We compared the vegetation structure, rodent density and seed loss rate between protected and disturbed sites affected from grazing by cattle, goats and sheep, in the Thar desert of India. A perennial tussocky grassLasiurus sindicus Hent. was largely dominant in the protected site, whileL. sindicus was rare and replaced by undershrub speciesAerva pseudotomentosa Blatt. & Halb. andCrotalaria burbira Buch.-Ham. in the overgrazed site. In the grazed site, plant coverage was low, but the density of rodent burrows and the frequency of rodent captures were significantly high as compared to the protected site. Corresponding with the density of desert rodents, seed predation was significantly higher in the grazed site than in the protected site. These results suggest that overgrazing by large mammals has strong effects on plant succession by altering not only the species composition and abundance of plant community, but also the habitat suitability for seed-eating rodents.     

A multi-species assessment of post-dispersal seed predation in the central Chilean Andes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Post-dispersal seed predation in alpine communities has received little attention despite evidence that seeds removed by granivores can decrease plant recruitment into ecosystems. Moreover, few studies have assessed the effects of removal of seeds of a range of species after dispersal on the seeds remaining in ecosystems. A comparison was made of the magnitude of seed removal by ants and birds of nine different shrubby-, herbaceous- and cushion-plant species in the central Chilean Andes in order to assess the interactions between birds, ants and wind, and the types of seeds. METHODS: A total of 324 soil-covered plates, each containing 50 seeds of one species, were placed in the field at an altitude of 2700 m and assigned to one of four treatments: control, exclusion of ants, birds, and both. The design also allowed the effects of wind to be assessed. Seed removal from plates was monitored over 20 d. KEY RESULTS: Mean accumulative seed removal by granivores averaged over all nine species combined was 25%. However, large differences between species were evident, with limited seed removal (3-11%) in three herbaceous species (Alstroemeria pallida, Sisyrinchium arenarium, Pozoa coriacea), moderate (18-33%) in five species, including a shrub (Chuquiraga oppositifolia), two herbs (Taraxacum officinale, Rhodophiala rhodolirion), and two cushion-plants (Laretia acaulis, Azorella monantha), and substantial (78%) in the shrub Anarthrophyllum cumingii. The magnitudes of losses caused by birds compared with ants did not differ for the majority of species, although removal by birds was greater than by ants in A. cumingii, and smaller for C. oppositifolia. CONCLUSIONS: Post-dispersal seed removal is shown to be an important cause of decreased potential plant species recruitment into alpine ecosystems. The substantial differences in the magnitude of seed losses to ants and birds demonstrate the need for evaluation of seed removal on a wide range of species in any given ecosystem.     

山杏的种子雨及鼠类的捕食作用

山杏(Prunus armeniaca)是一种灌木状小乔木,在北京山区较为贫瘠、干旱的阳坡地带广泛分布。于2002年7月和2003年7～9月,采用种子收集筐估计了山杏种子的产量、种子雨的动态变化过程;在2003年的研究中,把收集筐中所获得的种子转入扣网之中以排除鸟类的影响,并设置了地表对照样方,调查和比较了扣网内和对照样方中、扣网和对照样方之间山杏种子被取食、搬离的动态变化及其差异性。研究表明,山杏种子的下落高峰发生于7月下旬至8月上旬,败育种子的下落早于完好种子且数量极少;在扣网内和对照样方中,被取食和被搬运的种子数量之间存在显著性差异,在扣网和对照样方之间．被取食和被搬运的种子数量的差异均未达到显著性水平;鼠类是种子雨期间取食山杏种子的主要动物．鸟类的作用可以忽略。     

Foraging to balance conflicting demands: novel insights from grasshoppers under predation risk

Animal foraging may be influenced by multiple demands simultaneously(e g., nutrient gain and predator avoidance). Conventional approachesto understand the trade-offs between these demands require crammingthem in similar currencies, which is impractical in many fieldsituations. We introduce a new method, called multiobjectiveprogramming, as a framework to explore how animals balance conflictingdemands. Multiobjective programming allows one to explore theinfluence of foraging demands directly, without explicit assumptionsabout how they enter into fitness and without conversion tosome common currency. Using multiobjective programming, we showthat, as foraging demands change, animals may adaptively adjusttheir behavior, even if the constraints on feasible behaviorare unaffected (contrary to the predictions of the conventionalmodels). Hence, we may see a variable response in foraging thatis consistent with adaptive behavior. We used an empirical testwith herbivore grasshoppers and predator spiders to evaluatethe utility of multiobjective programming Our experiments showthat grasshoppers are able to optimally balance the foragingobjectives of energy intake and vigilance under changing levelsof predation risk. The multiobjective model is used both toevaluate the biological significance of the broad variationthat was observed in the grasshoppers' foraging behavior andto quantify explicitly the trade-off between energy intake andpredator avoidance.     

凋落物和土壤覆盖对动物取食和搬运辽东栎种子的影响

在六盘山区的华北落叶松人工林,研究了清除凋落物、凋落物覆盖和土壤覆盖(以不清除凋落物直接将种子投放于森林地表为对照)等处理对动物取食和搬运辽东栎种子的影响.结果表明:种子释放3d后,凋落物和土壤覆盖处理种子均具有较高的留存率(分别为10.7％和7.0％);释放14 d后,土壤覆盖处理种子的留存率仍最高(0.7％),但凋落物覆盖处理种子的留存率为0.凋落物和土壤覆盖处理种子的就地取食率很高(分别为45.9％和41.5％);清除凋落物处理种子的就地取食率最低(27.0％),但其被搬运后的取食率最高(49.8％);凋落物覆盖、清除凋落物和土壤覆盖处理种子被动物搬运后的埋藏率均显著高于对照(P＜0.01).种子被动物搬运后集中分布于5 m以内,尤其在＜1 m和l～2m两个距离组的分布频率更高;种子被搬运后取食的平均距离大干埋藏的平均距离,以土壤覆盖和凋落物覆盖处理最大,分别为2.38 m±0.55 m和1.44m±0.26 m.     

Influence of prey foraging posture on flight behavior and predation risk: predators take advantage of unwary prey

Foraging in animals is often associated with characteristicbody postures, such as the head-down posture. When foragingconflicts with the ability to detect predators or to flee, individualsmay incur a greater risk of mortality to predation than otherwise.Here we investigate the influence of different foraging postures(horizontal versus nose-down body posture) on the ability ofindividuals to respond to approaching predators and on the riskof mortality to predation in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).Individuals engaged in nose-down foraging were assumed to beable to visually scan a smaller area for predators and to escapeless effectively due to their body posture, and thus are morevulnerable to stalking predators than horizontally foragingones. In a first experiment, we separately exposed nonforaging,horizontally foraging, and nose-down foraging guppies to anapproaching cichlid fish predator model. Nonforaging guppiesreacted sooner to and initiated flight further away from theapproaching model than did foraging fish collectively, and horizontallyforaging individuals responded sooner to the model than nose-downforaging ones. Comparing all test guppies, nose-down foragingindividuals were the most likely not to exhibit any responseto the predator model. When presented with a simultaneous choiceof two guppies behind a one-way mirror, individual blue acaracichlid (Aequidens pulcher), a natural predator of the guppy,preferred to attack foraging guppies over nonforaging ones andnose-down foraging guppies over horizontally foraging individuals.In a final experiment with free-swimming cichlids and guppies,we demonstrated that individual risk of predation for guppiesforaging nose down was greater than for guppies foraging horizontally,and both were at greater risk than nonforaging guppies. Thislatter result is consistent with the above differences in theguppy's responsiveness to approaching predators depending ontheir foraging behavior, and with the finding that cichlid predatorspreferred fish that were less likely to show any response tothem. Our results therefore indicate that the ability to respondto approaching predators and the risk of mortality to predationin the guppy is strongly influenced by their foraging activity,and in particular their foraging posture, and that cichlid predatorspreferentially select less wary and more vulnerable guppies.[BehavEcol 7: 264–271 (1996)]     

Post‐dispersal seed predation and its relations with seed traits: a thirty‐species‐comparative study

Post‐dispersal seed predation is a key process determining the variability in seed survival in forests, where most seeds are handled by rodents. Seed predation is thought to affect seedling regeneration, colonization ability and spatial distribution of plants. Basic seed traits are the essential factors affecting rodent foraging preferences and thus seed survival and seedling recruitment. Many studies have discussed several seed traits and their effects upon seed predation by rodents. However, the results of those previous studies are usually equivocal, likely because few seed traits and/or plant species tend to be incorporated into these studies. In order to elucidate the relationships between seed predation and seed traits, we surveyed the predation of 48 600 seeds in a natural pine forest, belonging to 30 species, for three consecutive years. The results demonstrated that: (i) seed size and seed coat hardness did not significantly affect seed predation; (ii) total phenolics had a negative effect upon seed predation; (iii) positive effects of nitrogen content upon seed predation were found. From our study, it seems that the better strategy to prevent heavy predation is for plants to produce seeds with higher total phenolics content rather than physical defenses (i.e. hard seed coat) or larger seeds. Additionally, rodent foraging preference may depend more on Nitrogen content than other nutrient content of seeds.     

Mortality by moonlight: predation risk and the snowshoe hare

Optimal behavior theory suggests that prey animals will reduceactivity during intermittent periods when elevated predationrisk outweighs the fitness benefits of activity. Specifically,the predation risk allocation hypothesis predicts that preyactivity should decrease dramatically at times of high predationrisk if there is high temporal variation in predation risk butshould remain relatively uniform when temporal variation inpredation risk is low. To test these predictions we examinedthe seasonably variable response of snowshoe hares to moonlightand predation risk. Unlike studies finding uniform avoidanceof moonlight in small mammals, we find that moonlight avoidanceis seasonal and corresponds to seasonal variation in moonlightintensity. We radio-collared 177 wild snowshoe hares to estimatepredation rates as a measure of risk and used movement distancesfrom a sample of those animals as a measure of activity. Inthe snowy season, 5-day periods around full moons had 2.5 timesmore predation than around new moons, but that ratio of theincreased predation rate was only 1.8 in the snow-free season.There was no significant increase in use of habitats with morehiding cover during full moons. Snowshoe hares' nightly movementdistances decreased during high-risk full-moon periods in thesnowy season but did not change according to moon phase in thesnow-free season. These results are consistent with the predationrisk allocation hypothesis.     

Non-equivalence of growth arrest induced by predation risk or food limitation: context-dependent compensatory growth in anuran tadpoles

1. To gain insight into the evolution of compensatory growth, we studied the growth patterns of anuran (Rana temporaria) larvae following either a period of exogenous growth depression (food restriction) or a period of endogenous depression (exposure to predators). We also investigated the potential deferred costs that larval compensatory growth could impose on post-metamorphic individuals. 2. Food-deprived larvae exhibited full compensatory growth in response to reduced growth rates caused by food limitation, and the growth trajectories of low- and high-rations tadpoles converged before the onset of metamorphosis. 3. According to our predictions, individuals exposed to larval predators did not show growth compensation following predator removal despite undergoing a significant reduction in growth rate associated with low activity levels. 4. Jumping ability of individuals exposed to predators during only 20 days from the commencement of the larval phase was equivalent to that of non-exposed animals, and greater than the jumping capacity of those maintained with predators until the time of metamorphosis. This pattern was consistent with the pattern observed for variation in relative leg length. 5. These results support the suggestion that submaximum and compensatory growth could have evolved to minimize the overall growth/mortality costs in environments with high spatiotemporal variation in predation intensity.     

The influence of predation risk on diet selectivity: A theoretical analysis

Studies that have examined the effect of experimental increases in predation risk on diet selectivity have shown both decreased and increased diet selectivity. A possible explanation for these disparate results emerges from an examination of the prey sets used in these studies, which differed in the relationship between the values of risk components associated with the capture of different prey types (‘danger’) and their profitabilities. When less profitable prey were more dangerous, selectivity increased with predation risk. When prey were equally dangerous, selectivity did not change. Finally, when the more profitable prey were also more dangerous, selectivity decreased with risk. Here, we examine theoretically the influence of a forager's estimate of the probability that a predator is present (φ) on the selection of diets from prey sets with varying danger–profitability relationships. A dynamic programming model is used to determine the maximum attack time (or distance) for each of two types of prey, differing in their energetic content, for a range of forager energy state and φ levels. The diets which would result if foragers attacked prey according to the rules provided by the dynamic model are then determined. The model results indicate that the prey danger–profitability relationship determines the diet selectivity response to φ, confirming that variation in this relationship could be responsible for the range of experimental results. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Scent marking by voles in response to predation risk: a field-laboratory validation

Predators use scent to locate their prey, and prey animals oftenalter their behavior in response to predation risk. I testedthe hypothesis that voles would decrease their frequency ofscent marking in response to predation risk. I conducted trialsin which prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster, and woodland voles,M. pinetorum, were allowed to scent mark ceramic tiles placedin their runways in the field. The tiles were subjected to oneof three treatments: scented with odor from mink, Mustela vison(a rodent predator); rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (a nonpredatormammal control); and no odor (control). No significant differenceswere found in the frequency of scent marking in response tothe three treatments for either species. To validate that volesdid not decrease their scent marking in response to predationrisk, I brought male prairie voles from the field site intothe laboratory and allowed them to scent mark white paper substratetreated with mink odor, rabbit odor, or no odor. No significantdifferences were found in the frequency of scent marks in responseto the three treatments. These results differ from what waspredicted based on laboratory studies with other species ofrodents that show avoidance, reproductive suppression, decreasedactivity, and reduced scent marking in response to odors ofpredators. Voles appear to scent mark different substrates andunder a wide variety of social and environmental situations,and this is not influenced by the presence of odor from a predator.     

Foraging among cannibals and kleptoparasites: effects of prey size on pike behavior

The northern pike (Esox lucius) is an important and selective piscivorethat chooses smaller prey than predicted from energy / timebudgets. In a laboratory experiment, we investigated pike predatorybehavior to explain this selectivity. Northern pike feedingon different prey sizes in aquaria were observed when foragingalone, when in the presence of chemical cues from similar-sizedor larger conspecifics, and when in the presence of conspecifics thatwere allowed to interact with the focal pike. The results showthat prey handling time increases with prey size and that theduration of manipulating and handling prey inflicts a risk ofexposure to cannibals and kleptoparasites on the pike. Therefore,the risk of falling victim to cannibals or kleptoparasites increaseswith prey size. Attracting and experiencing intraspecific interactorscan be regarded as major fitness costs. Chemical cues from foragingconspecifics have only minor effects on pike foraging behavior.Furthermore, the ability to strike and swallow prey head first improvespike predatory performance because failing to do so increases handlingtime. Our findings emphasize the increasing potential costswith large prey and explain previous contradictory suggestionson the underlying mechanisms of behavior, selectivity, and trophiceffects of northern pike predation.     

Constrating short-term and long-term effects of predation risk on consumer habitat use and resources

I contrasted the short-term and long-term effects of predationrisk on snail habitat use and resource dynamics. Pulmonate snails(Physella gyrina) were placed into experimental pools and exposedto four levels of predation risk while holding their densityconstant. Periphyton resources were made available in two habitats:open and covered. I hypothesized that a behavioral responseby snails to predation risk would influence periphyton standingcrop in the open and covered habitats. Snails responded to increasingpredation risk by moving into safer (covered) habitats, andthe magnitude of their response was sensitive to the actuallevel of risk: intermediate levels of risk resulted in intermediatehabitat use. However, use of the risky (open) habitat by snailswas time dependent Snails initially responded strongly to predationrisk, but they exhibited similar patterns of habitat use atall risk levels by the end of the experiment Periphyton standingcrop was positively related to predation risk. In contrast tosnail habitat use, this response was initially weak and becamestronger as the experiment progressed. Thus, the short-and long-termresponses of snail habitat use and periphyton standing cropcontrasted sharply. I suggest that the changing patterns ofsnail habitat use over time are consistent with the idea thatsnails balance predation risk against foraging gains when selectinghabitats and that the manner in which they balance foraginggains and predation risk determines the pattern of periphytonstanding crops across habitats