Developmental control of a promoter-specific factor that is also regulated by the E1A gene product

We have detected a cellular factor in F9 teratocarcinoma cells that recognizes an adenovirus E1A inducible promoter. This factor, termed E2F, was previously identified in HeLa cells and was found at increased levels as a function of the E1A gene product. Upon differentiation of F9 cells with retinoic acid and cAMP, the factor declines to near undetectable levels, consistent with the control of this factor by E1A and the presence of a cellular E1A-like activity in F9 cells but not in differentiated F9 cells. Finally, if the E1A gene is introduced into differentiated cells by an adenovirus infection, there is a large increase in the level of the factor. We suggest that the control of E2F during F9 differentiation is indeed due to an E1A-like activity.     

Expression of various viral and cellular enhancer-promoters during differentiation of human embryonal carcinoma cells

Alterations in the pattern of gene expression were studied during differentiation of the human embryonal carcinoma (EC) cell line NEC14. NEC14 cells can be induced to differentiate by the addition of 10(-2) M N,N'-hexamethylene-bis-acetamide (HMBA). The efficiency of DNA transfection of undifferentiated and differentiated NEC14 cells was compared by measuring the activities of endogenous and exogenously introduced promoters for the beta-actin gene and heat shock protein 70 gene. The results indicated that the efficiency was not significantly different in cells of these two states. Under the conditions used, all the viral enhancer-promoters tested showed very little or no activity in undifferentiated cells, but activities of SV40, BKV, adenovirus and RSV enhancers were greatly increased after differentiation. Activities of these viral enhancers in differentiated cells were completely repressed by cotransfection with the adenovirus E1A gene. An E1A-inducible promoter of the adenovirus E2 gene showed stronger activity in differentiated than in undifferentiated cells, and was not activated efficiently by cotransfection with the E1A gene in either undifferentiated or differentiated cells. These results indicate that factor(s) regulating activities of various enhancer-promoters in NEC14 cells is or are different from E1A-like factor(s) present in mouse EC F9 cells.     

Polyomavirus genome and polyomavirus enhancer-driven gene expression during myogenesis.

The mRNAs for myogenic functions are coordinately transcribed with polyomavirus (Py) early mRNA during in vitro differentiation of mouse C2 myoblast cells. Sequence analysis shows that the A domain of the Py enhancer includes an E1A-like consensus sequence that is also found in the 5' upstream region of two genes expressed during myoblast differentiation: alpha-actin and myosin light chain. Therefore, the coordinate expression of such genes with Py early mRNA may be activated by a common cellular regulatory factor. In the present work, we report that C2 cells surviving Py infection are unable to differentiate and do not express alpha-actin and myosin light-chain mRNAs. Hybrids between such Py-resistant myoblast cells and the parental cells exhibited dominance of the permissibility to Py growth and of the expression of myogenic mRNAs. In C2 cells transiently transfected with a chimeric plasmid (pSVPy12CAT) harboring the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene driven by the Py enhancer-promoter region, the CAT gene was expressed irrespective of their stage of differentiation. Moreover, undifferentiated stably transfected cells expressing the CAT gene restricted viral growth. Py-resistant C2 myoblasts transiently transfected with pSVPy12CAT also expressed the CAT gene driven by the Py enhancer. This contradictory finding is similar to results previously obtained by other investigators with cloned genes specific for myogenic functions, and it may be explained by a structural difference between the pSVPy12CAT and the Py genomic organizations in which the viral enhancer operates.