Visual pigment processes and prolonged pupillary responses in insect photoreceptor cells

The visual pigment in the peripheral retinular cells of the hoverfly Syrphus balteatus was investigated by absorbance difference measurements. Different visual pigments were found in the dorsal versus the ventral part of the eye in the male, but not in the female. In the male in the dorsal part of the eye the visual pigment has an isosbestic point at 513 nm; in the ventral part this value is 490 nm. The latter value is found in the female in both parts of the eye.Prolonged pupillary responses were studied in the male Syrphus and appeared to be most marked in the ventral part of the eye. In both hoverfly and blowfly prolonged pupillary responses are induced by short wavelength light only; i.e., by light which excessively can convert rhodopsin into metarhodopsin. By contrast, in butterflies red light (and a long dark adaptation time) is necessary to evoke a prolonged pupillary response. It was demonstrated in both hoverfly and blowfly that long wavelength light, which reconverts metarhodopsin into rhodopsin, inhibits a prolonged pupillary response; or, accelerates pupil opening.Based on material presented at the European Neurosciences Meeting, Florence, September 1978     

The visual pigment and visual cycle of the lobster,Homarus

Summary The visual pigment of the American lobster,Homarus americanus, has been studied in individual isolated rhabdoms by microspectrophotometry. Lobster rhodopsin has _max at 515 nm and is converted by light to a stable metarhodopsin with _max at 490 nm. These figures are in good agreement with corresponding values obtained by Wald and Hubbard (1957) in digitonin extracts. Photoregeneration of rhodopsin to metarhodopsin is also observed. The absorbance spectrum of lobster metarhodopsin is invariant with pH in the range 5.4–9, indicating that even after isomerization of the chromophore fromcis totrans, the binding site of the chromophore remains sequestered from the solvent environment. Total axial density of the lobster rhabdom to unpolarized light is about 0.7.As described for several other Crustacea, aldehyde fixation renders the metarhodopsin susceptible to photobleaching, a process that is faster at alkaline than at neutral or acid pH. Small amounts of a photoproduct with _max at 370 nm are occasionally seen. A slower dark bleaching of lobster rhabdoms (_1/2–2 h) also occurs, frequently through intermediates with absorption similar to metarhodopsin.The molar extinction coefficient of metarhodopsin is about 1.2 times greater than that of rhodopsin, each measured at their respective _max. Isomerization of the chromophore fromcis totrans is accompanied by a change in the orientation of the absorption vector of about 3°. The absorption vector of metarhodopsin is either tilted more steeply into the membrane or is less tightly oriented with respect to the microvillar axes.When living lobsters are kept at room temperature, light adaptation does not result in an accumulation of metarhodopsin. At 4 °C, however, the same adapting lights cause a reduction of rhodopsin and an increase in metarhodopsin. There is thus a temperature-sensitive regeneration mechanism that supplements photoregeneration. Following 1 ms, 0.1 joule xenon flashes that convert about 70% of the rhodopsin to metarhodopsin in vivo, dark regeneration occurs in the living eye with half-times of about 25 and 55 min at 22 °C and 15 °C respectively.This work was supported by USPHS research grant EY 00222 to Yale University. S.N.B. was aided by NIH Postdoctoral Fellowship EY 52378.     

Microspectrophotometry of single rhabdoms in the retina of the honeybee drone (Apis mellifera male)

The relative absorption spectra of the bistable photopigment of single rhabdoms from the dorsal region of the retina of the honeybee drone were obtained using slices of retina fixed in glutaraldehyde; less accurate measurements on unfixed tissue gave difference spectra that were similar to those for fixed retinae. The method used was based on measurements of absorbance changes during saturating adaptations of the visual pigment to different monochromatic lights. It is similar to previous methods based on measurements of difference spectra amplitudes, but is simpler to use and more accurate. The predominant pigment has states that absorb maximally at 446 (rhodopsin) and 505 nm (metarhodopsin). In addition, there is a small amount of another pigment whose two states absorb maximally at approximately 340 (UV) and 460 nm.     

Spectral absorption and sensitivity measurements in single ommatidia of the green crab,Carcinus

Summary Rhabdoms of the green crabCarcinus maenas were examined by microspectrophotometry and found to contain a visual pigment with _max at 502–506 nm. Upon irradiation, a stable metarhodopsin formed with unchanged _max and molar extinction coefficient. In the presence of 5% glutaraldehyde the rhabdoms were photobleached. Partial bleaching experiments indicate that in the rhabdoms studied, only one visual pigment was present, with an absorption spectrum appropriate for a hypothetical rhodopsin from Dartnall's (1953) nomogram.Retinular (photoreceptor) cells were studied with microelectrodes. They had negative resting potentials of 30–65 mV and responded to light with depolarizing receptor potentials. All cells had maximum sensitivity at ~493 nm, as did the ERG (electroretinogram). Selective adaptation failed to alter the spectral sensitivity functions of single cells or the ERG. If these spectral sensitivity data are pooled with Wald's (1968), the average sensitivity of the dark-adapted eye is accounted for adequately by the pigment of the rhabdom.The results of this work do not support the hypothesis of Horridge (1967) that each ommatidium ofCarcinus has two color receptors.This work was supported by U.S. P.H.S. grant EY 00222.     

Visual pigment spectra of the comma butterfly,<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Polygonia c-album</Emphasis>, derived from in vivo epi-illumination microspectrophotometry

The visual pigments in the compound eye of the comma butterfly, Polygonia c-album, were investigated in a specially designed epi-illumination microspectrophotometer. Absorption changes due to photochemical conversions of the visual pigments, or due to light-independent visual pigment decay and regeneration, were studied by measuring the eye shine, i.e., the light reflected from the tapetum located in each ommatidium proximal to the visual pigment-bearing rhabdom. The obtained absorbance difference spectra demonstrated the dominant presence of a green visual pigment. The rhodopsin and its metarhodopsin have absorption peak wavelengths at 532 nm and 492 nm, respectively. The metarhodopsin is removed from the rhabdom with a time constant of 15 min and the rhodopsin is regenerated with a time constant of 59 min (room temperature). A UV rhodopsin with metarhodopsin absorbing maximally at 467 nm was revealed, and evidence for a blue rhodopsin was obtained indirectly.     

Visual pigment,dark adaptation and rhodopsin renewal in the eye of Pontoporeia affinis (Crustacea,Amphipoda)

The benthic amphipod Pontoporeia affinis lives in the Baltic sea and in northern European lakes in an environment where very little light is available for vision. The eyes, consisting of 40–50 ommatidia, are correspondingly modified. Microspectrophotometric recordings on isolated eyes show the presence of at least two kinds of screening pigments in the ommatidia with maxima at 540–580 nm and 460–500 nm. Difference spectra obtained from the rhabdoms after exposure to red and blue light, respectively, give evidence of a single rhodopsin with its maximum at 548 nm and a 500-nm metarhodopsin. In ERG recordings sensitivity in the dark-adapted state, after saturating exposures to blue and to red light, stabilizes at levels determined by the rhodopsin concentration. No change is observed during 10–14 h after the beginning of dark adaptation. However, using animals pre-exposed with a strong red light and then kept in darkness, it is found that after a delay of 20–40 h sensitivity of the dark-adapted eye begins to increase and finally, after 5–6 days reaches a level corresponding to 100% rhodopsin. Thus, a slow renewal of rhodopsin appears to occur in darkness, where a photoisomerization of metarhodopsin is excluded.Abbreviations ERG electroretinogram - IR infrared - MSP microspectrophotometry     

Non-local interactions between light induced processes inCalliphora photoreceptors

Summary The prolonged depolarizing afterpotential (PDA) is a phenomenon which is tightly linked to visual pigment conversion. In order to determine whether processes underlying PDA induction and depression can spread in space, the PDA was recorded intracellularly in white-eyedCalliphora R1-6 photoreceptors and used to examine interactions between processes induced by activating statistically different photopigment molecules (Figs. 3–6). It was found that a PDA induced by converting some fraction of rhodopsin (R) molecules forward into the metarhodopsin (M) state can be completely depressed by equal or smaller amounts of pigment conversion, backward from metarhodopsin to rhodopsin even when largely different sets of pigment molecules were shifted in the respective directions, in agreement with previous experiments conducted on the barnacle. The characteristics of the afterpotentials obtained following the cessation of strong blue and green light stimuli which did not cause a net pigment conversion was examined (Figs. 7, 8). It was found that these afterpotentials, obtained when nonet R to M conversion took place, could not be depressed by an opposite net large M to R pigment conversion. Accordingly we propose to restrict the term PDA to an afterpotential which can be depressed by a net M to R pigment conversion. It is concluded: (a) that some processes underlying PDA induction and depression inCalliphora must interact at a distance which extends at least to the nearest neighboring pigment molecule, and (b) that inCalliphora photoreceptors net pigment conversion is required in order to induce and depress a PDA.Abbreviations R rhodopsin - M metarhodopsin - R to M rhodopsin to metarhodopsin pigment conversion - M to R metarhodopsin to rhodopsin pigment conversion - PDA prolonged depolarizing afterpotential - ERG electroretinogram - M potential metarhodopsin potential - ERP early receptor potential     

Responses of crayfish photoreceptor cells following intense light adaptation

Summary After intense orange adapting exposures that convert 80% of the rhodopsin in the eye to metarhodopsin, rhabdoms become covered with accessory pigment and appear to lose some microvillar order. Only after a delay of hours or even days is the metarhodopsin replaced by rhodopsin (Cronin and Goldsmith 1984). After 24 h of dark adaptation, when there has been little recovery of visual pigment, the photoreceptor cells have normal resting potentials and input resistances, and the reversal potential of the light response is 10–15 mV (inside positive), unchanged from controls. The log V vs log I curve is shifted about 0.6 log units to the right on the energy axis, quantitatively consistent with the decrease in the probability of quantum catch expected from the lowered concentration of rhodopsin in the rhabdoms. Furthermore, at 24 h the photoreceptors exhibit a broader spectral sensitivity than controls, which is also expected from accumulations of metarhodopsin in the rhabdoms. In three other respects, however, the transduction process appears to be light adapted: (i) The voltage responses are more phasic than those of control photoreceptors. (ii) The relatively larger effect (compared to controls) of low extracellular Ca⁺⁺ (1 mmol/1 EGTA) in potentiating the photoresponses suggests that the photoreceptors may have elevated levels of free cytoplasmic Ca⁺⁺. (iii) The saturating depolarization is only about 30% as large as the maximal receptor potentials of contralateral, dark controls, and by that measure the log V-log I curve is shifted downward by 0.54 log units. The gain (change in conductance per absorbed photon) therefore appears to have been diminished.     

Euphausiid visual pigments. The rhodopsins of Euphausia superba and Meganyctiphanes norvegica (Crustacea, Euphausiacea)

The rhabdoms of Euphausia superba contain one digitonin-extractable rhodopsin, lambda max 485 nm. The rhodopsin undergoes unusual pH- dependent spectral changes: above neutrality, the absorbance decreases progressively at 485 nm and rises near 370 nm. This change is reversible and appears to reflect an equilibrium between a protonated and an unprotonated form of the rhodopsin Schiff-base linkage. Near neutral pH and at 10 degrees C, the rhodopsin is partiaLly converted by 420-nm light to a stable 493-nm metarhodopsin. The metarhodopsin is partially photoconverted to rhodopsin by long-wavelength light in the absence of NH2OH; in the presence of NH2OH, it is slowly converted to retinal oxime and opsin. The rhodopsin of Meganyctiphanes norvegica measured in fresh rhabdoms by microspectrophotometry has properties very similar to those of the extracted rhodopsin of E. superba. Its lambda max is 488 nm and it is partially photoconverted by short wavelength irradiation to a stable photoconvertible metarhodopsin similar to that of E. superba. In the presence of light and NH2OH, the M. norvegica metarhodopsin is converted to retinal oxime and opsin. Our results indicate that previous determinations of euphausiid rhodopsin absorbance spectra were incorrect because of accessory pigment contamination.     

Afterpotentials in dronefly retinula cells

Summary The wavelength dependence of the afterpotentials following a bright illumination was studied in single photoreceptor cells of the droneflyEristalis. Cells with only a spectral sensitivity peak in the blue were selected. As previously demonstrated, these cells contain a rhodopsin absorbing maximally at about 450–460 nm, which upon photoconversion transforms into a metarhodopsin absorbing maximally at about 550 nm (Tsukahara and Horridge, 1977).With the visual pigment initially all in the rhodopsin form, a high rate of visual pigment conversion results in an afterhyperpolarization (AHP) when the fraction of metarhodopsin remains negligible after illumination as occurs at longer wavelengths if the intensity is high. Intensive illumination at short wavelengths is followed by a prolonged depolarizing afterpotential (PDA). The magnitude of the PDA peaks at low intensities at about 450–460 nm, corresponding to the peak of the cell's spectral sensitivity (i.e. the rhodopsin peak). With increasing intensity of illumination, however, the peak shifts progressively towards 430 nm, which corresponds to the photoequilibrium with maximum metarhodopsin that can be established by monochromatic light. From this result, it is inferred that the PDA is related to the induced fall in the rhodopsin fraction. The PDA can be abolished, or knocked down, by a long-wavelength flash which reconverts remaining metarhodopsin into rhodopsin. Therefore the decline of the PDA is restrained by the existing amount of metarhodopsin. Possible theories of afterpotentials are discussed.     

Photosensitivity spectrum of crayfish rhodopsin measured using fluorescence of metarhodopsin

Discrepancies exist among spectral measurements of sensitivity of crayfish photoreceptors, their absorption in situ, and the number and absorption spectra of crayfish photopigments that are extracted by digitonin solutions. We have determined the photosensitivity spectrum of crayfish rhodopsin in isolated rhabdoms using long wavelength fluorescence emission from crayfish metarhodopsin as an intrinsic probe. There is no measurable metarhodopsin in the dark-adapted receptor, so changes in the emission level are directly proportional to metarhodopsin concentration. We therefore used changes in metarhodopsin fluorescence to construct relaxation and saturation ("photoequilibrium") spectra, from which the photosensitivity spectrum of crayfish rhodopsin was calculated. This spectrum peaks at or approximately 530 nm and closely resembles the previously measured difference spectrum for total bleaches of dark-adapted rhabdoms. Measurements of the kinetics of changes in rhabdom fluorescence and in transmittance at 580 nm were compared with predictions derived from several model systems containing one or two photopigments. The comparison shows that only a single rhodopsin and its metarhodopsin are present in the main rhabdom of crayfish, and that other explanations must be sought for the multiple pigments seen in digitonin solution. The same analysis shows that there is no detectable formation of isorhodopsin in the rhabdom.     

Fast Electrical Potential from a Long-Lived,Long-Wavelength Photoproduct of Fly Visual Pigment

A rapid electrical potential, which we have named the M-potential, can be obtained from the Drosophila eye using a high energy flash stimulus. The potential can be elicited from the normal fly, but it is especially prominent in the mutant norp A^P12 (a phototransduction mutant), particularly if the eye color pigments are genetically removed from the eye. Several lines of evidence suggest that the M-potential arises from photoexcitation of long-lived metarhodopsin. Photoexcitation of rhodopsin does not produce a comparable potential. The spectral sensitivity of the M-potential peaks at about 575 nm. The M-potential pigment (metarhodopsin) can be shown to photoconvert back and forth with a "silent pigment(s)" absorbing maximally at about 485 nm. The silent pigment presumably is rhodopsin. These results support the recent spectrophotometric findings that dipteran metarhodopsin absorbs at much longer wavelengths than rhodopsin. The M-potential probably is related to the photoproduct component of the early receptor potential (ERP). Two major differences between the M-potential and the classical ERP are: (a) Drosophila rhodopsin does not produce a rapid photoresponse, and (b) an anesthetized or freshly sacrificed animal does not yield the M-potential. As in the case of the ERP, the M-potential appears to be a response associated with a particular state of the fly visual pigment. Therefore, it should be useful in in vivo investigations of the fly visual pigment, about which little is known.     

Reversible phosphorylation of opsin induced by irradiation of blowfly retinae

Summary Light-induced phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the visual pigment protein, opsin, was investigated in isolated retinae of the blowfly making use of the fact that photon capture by rhodopsin leads to the formation of a thermostable metarhodopsin. Retinae were exposed, in the presence of exogenous³²P-orthophosphate, to an intense blue light which initiated the phosphorylation of opsin (half-time about 5 min at 25 °C). Subsequent exposure of the retina to red light converted all the metarhodopsin present into rhodopsin and triggered a relatively rapid dephosphorylation of rhodopsin (half-time less than 20 s). It is proposed that the phosphorylated forms of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin represent inactive states of the pigment, i.e. phosphorylated metarhodopsin does not initiate reactions leading to the excitation of the photoreceptor cell and phosphorylated rhodopsin cannot be converted into physiologically active metarhodopsin without first being dephosphorylated.Abbreviations R1–6 peripheral retinula cells of the blowfly ommatidium - PDA prolonged depolarizing afterpotential - R rhodopsin - M metarhodopsin - R-P _n phosphorylated rhodopsin - M-P _n phosphorylated metarhodopsin - SDS-PAGE sodium dodecylsulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis     

Photopigment and receptor properties in Drosophila compound eye and ocellar receptors

A review of the spectral sensitivity and the rhodopsin and metarhodopsin characteristics in three compound eye receptor types (R1–6, R7, and R8) and ocellar receptors is presented (Fig. 1). Photopigment properties were determined from measures of conversion efficiency. The photopigments of R1–6 were studied using in vivo microspectrophotometry in the deep pseudopupil of white-eyed flies. These studies yielded a refined estimate of the R1–6 metarhodopsin spectrum (Fig. 2). The quantum efficiency relative to the spectral sensitivity estimate of the rhodopsin spectrum was factored out. The quantum efficiency of rhodopsin is about 1.75 times that of metarhodopsin. The peak absorbance of metarhodopsin was estimated to be about 2.6 times that of rhodopsin. The mechanism of the two-peaked R1–6 spectral sensitivity and metarhodopsin spectrum is discussed in terms of evidence that there is only one rhodopsin in R1–6 and that vitamin A deprivation preferentially lowers ultraviolet sensitivity. The prolonged depolarizing afterpotential is reviewed from the standpoint of the internal transmitter hypothesis of visual excitation. A careful comparison of the intensity-responsivity for photopigment conversion and its adaptional consequences is made (Fig. 3).     

Studies on cephalopod rhodopsin. Conformational changes in chromophore and protein during the photoregeneration process

The ultraviolet absorbance of squid and octopus rhodopsin changes reversibly at 234 nm and near 280 nm in the interconversion of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin. The absorbance change near 280 nm is ascribed to both protein and chromophore parts. Rhodopsin is photoregenerated from metarhodopsin via an intermediate, P380, on irradiation with yellow light (λ > 520 nm). The ultraviolet absorbance decreases in the change from rhodopsin to metarhodopsin and recovers in two steps; mostly in the process from metarhodopsin to P380 and to a lesser extent in the process from P380 to rhodopsin. P380 has a circular dichroism (CD) band at 380 nm and its magnitude is the same order as that of rhodopsin. Thus it is considered that the molecular structure of P380 is close to that of rhodopsin and that the chromophore is fixed to opsin as in rhodopsin. In the change from metarhodopsin to P380, the chromophore is isomerized from the all-trans to the 11-cis form, and the conformation of opsin changes to fit 11-cis retinal. In the change from P380 to rhodopsin, a small change in the conformation of the protein part and the protonation of the Schiff base, the primary retinal-opsin link, occur.     

Microspectrophotometry of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin in the moth Galleria

Fresh, frozen sections of the photoreceptor layer of the compound eye of the moth Galleria have been examined by microspectrophotometry, using 4 X 8 mum measuring beams that sampled from approximately two to four rhabdoms. The principal visual pigmen: absorbs maximally at 510 nm (P510), and on irradiation is converted to a thermally stable, pH-insensitive metarhodopsin with lambdamax at 484 nm (M484) and a 43% increase in molar extinction coefficient. Subsequently, short wavelength irradiation of the metarhodopsin photoregenerates some P510; but the absence of an isosbestic point in the cycle of spectral changes is consistent with the presence of smaller amounts of violet- or ultraviolet-sensitive visual pigment(s) that also are converted to a blue-absorb g metarhodopsin. Difference spectra for both P510 and M484 were measured, using hydroxylamine. The 484-nm metarhodopsin is reversibly converted to a form with lambdamax at 363 nm by high concentrations of glycerol. Dark regeneration of rhodopsin in vivo after several minutes exposure of thoroughly dark-adapted animals to full sunlight requires several days.     

Retinal receptor types inAglais urticae andPieris brassicae (Lepidoptera), revealed by analysis of the electroretinogram obtained with Fourier interferometric stimulation (FIS)

Summary Electroretinograms obtained in the butterfliesAglais urticae andPieris brassicae by the procedure of Fourier interferometric stimulation (FIS) were used to construct spectral sensitivity curves. These curves, representing the combined responses of several receptor types, were approximated by summation of spectral sensitivity curves for individual pigments, and the presence of these pigments was corroborated by chromatic adaptation experiments. The results show that the retina in the compound eye ofAglais urticae contains 3 photopigments, with maximal absorption at ca. 360 nm, 460 nm and 530 nm, respectively (Fig. 5). The retina in the compound eye ofPieris brassicae has two subdivisions. In the dorsal region of the eye 3 photopigments were found, with maxima at ca. 360 nm, 450 nm and 560 nm (Fig. 8). In the medioventral region pigments with essentially the same maxima are present together with an additional, fourth long-wavelength component with effective maximal absorption at ca. 620 nm (Fig. 11). Its absorption curve is considerably narrower than would be expected for a rhodopsin with the same absorption maximum, and presumably results from the spectral combination of a photopigment and a photostable screening pigment.Abbreviations FIS Fourier interferometric stimulation - WLP White-light position - ERG Electroretinogram     

Microspectrophotometric characterization and localization of three visual pigments in the compound eye ofNotonecta glauca L. (Heteroptera)

Summary The absorption maxima ( _max) of the visual pigments in the ommatidia ofNotonecta glauca were found by measuring the difference spectra of single rhabdomeres after alternating illumination with two different adaptation wavelengths. All the peripheral rhabdomeres contain a pigment with an extinction maximum at 560 nm. This pigment is sensitive to red light up to wavelengths > 700 nm. In a given ommatidium in the dorsal region of the eye, the two central rhabdomeres both contain one of two pigments, either a pigment with an absorption maximum in the UV, at 345 nm, or — in neighboring rhabdoms — a pigment with an absorption maximum at 445 nm. In the ventral part of the eye only the pigment absorbing maximally in the UV was found in the central rhabdomeres. The spectral absorption properties of various types of screening-pigment granules were measured.     

The contribution of a sensitizing pigment to the photosensitivity spectra of fly rhodopsin and metarhodopsin.

Most of the photoreceptors of the fly compound eye have high sensitivity in the ultraviolet (UV) as well as in the visible spectral range. This UV sensitivity arises from a photostable pigment that acts as a sensitizer for rhodopsin. Because the sensitizing pigment cannot be bleached, the classical determination of the photosensitivity spectrum from measurements of the difference spectrum of the pigment cannot be applied. We therefore used a new method to determine the photosensitivity spectra of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin in the UV spectral range. The method is based on the fact that the invertebrate visual pigment is a bistable one, in which rhodopsin and metarhodopsin are photointerconvertible. The pigment changes were measured by a fast electrical potential, called the M potential, which arises from activation of metarhodopsin. We first established the use of the M potential as a reliable measure of the visual pigment changes in the fly. We then calculated the photosensitivity spectrum of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin by using two kinds of experimentally measured spectra: the relaxation and the photoequilibrium spectra. The relaxation spectrum represents the wavelength dependence of the rate of approach of the pigment molecules to photoequilibrium. This spectrum is the weighted sum of the photosensitivity spectra of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin. The photoequilibrium spectrum measures the fraction of metarhodopsin (or rhodopsin) in photoequilibrium which is reached in the steady state for application of various wavelengths of light. By using this method we found that, although the photosensitivity spectra of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin are very different in the visible, they show strict coincidence in the UV region. This observation indicates that the photostable pigment acts as a sensitizer for both rhodopsin as well as metarhodopsin.     

Photopigment and receptor properties in Drosophila compound eye and ocellar receptors

A review of the spectral sensitivity and the rhodopsin and metarhodopsin characteristics in three compound eye receptor types (R1-6, R7, and R8) and ocellar receptors is presented (Fig. 1). Photopigment properties were determined from measures of conversion efficiency. The photopigments of R1-6 were studied using in vivo microspectrophotometry in the deep pseudopupil of white-eyed flies. These studies yielded a refined estimate of the R1-6 metarhodopsin spectrum (Fig. 2). The quantum efficiency relative to the spectral sensitivity estimate of the rhodopsin spectrum was factored out. The quantum efficiency of rhodopsin is about 1.75 times that of metarhodopsin. The peak absorbance of metarhodopsin was estimated to be about 2.6 times that of rhodopsin. The mechanism of the two-peaked R1-6 spectral sensitivity and metarhodopsin spectrum is discussed in terms of evidence that there is only one rhodopsin in R1-6 and that vitamin A deprivation preferentially lowers ultraviolet sensitivity. The prolonged depolarizing afterpotential is reviewed from the standpoint of the internal transmitter hypothesis of visual excitation. A careful comparison of the intensity-responsivity for photopigment conversion and its adaptional consequences is made (Fig. 3).