Anurans as prey: an exploratory analysis and size relationships between predators and their prey

The vertebrate predators of post-metamorphic anurans were quantified and the predator–prey relationship was investigated by analysing the relative size of invertebrate predators and anurans. More than 100 vertebrate predators were identified (in more than 200 reports) and classified as opportunistic, convenience, temporary specialized and specialized predators. Invertebrate predators were classified as solitary non-venomous, venomous and social foragers according to 333 reviewed reports. Each of these categories of invertebrate predators was compared with the relative size of the anurans, showing an increase in the relative size of the prey when predators used special predatory tactics. The number of species and the number of families of anurans that were preyed upon did not vary with the size of the predator, suggesting that prey selection was not arbitrary and that energetic constraints must be involved in this choice. The relatively low predation pressure upon brachycephalids was related to the presence of some defensive strategies of its species. This compounding review can be used as the foundation for future advances in vertebrate predator–prey interactions.     

Foraging traits of native predators determine their vulnerability to a toxic alien prey

相似文献   

The responses of polyphagous predators to prey spatial heterogeneity: aggregation by carabid and staphylinid beetles to their cereal aphid prey

Abstract. 1. Discrete patches of aphids were artificially created in winter wheat fields in 1982 and in 1983 using field cages.
2. Aggregation by polyphagous predators at these patches following cage removal was measured using pitfall traps in patch and control areas.
3. Several species of polyphagous beetle (Carabidae and Staphylinidae) aggregated in these patches while other species did not.
4. The consequences of aggregation by polyphagous predators to a single prey species are discussed.     

Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations

Alien predators are widely considered to be more harmful to prey populations than native predators. To evaluate this expectation, we conducted a meta-analysis of the responses of vertebrate prey in 45 replicated and 35 unreplicated field experiments in which the population densities of mammalian and avian predators had been manipulated. Our results showed that predator origin (native versus alien) had a highly significant effect on prey responses, with alien predators having an impact double that of native predators. Also the interaction between location (mainland versus island) and predator origin was significant, revealing the strongest effects with alien predators in mainland areas. Although both these results were mainly influenced by the huge impact of alien predators on the Australian mainland compared with their impact elsewhere, the results demonstrate that introduced predators can impose more intense suppression on remnant populations of native species and hold them further from their predator-free densities than do native predators preying upon coexisting prey.     

The microdistribution of some lotic insect predators in relation to their prey and to abiotic factors

SUMMARY. 1. The microdistribution of three species of insect predators in a Swedish stream was assessed using a multivariate statistical approach. Both abiotic factors and factors pertaining to the prey community were included in the analysis.
2. The factors most strongly correlated to the distribution of large Dinocras cephalotes were the densities of case less caddis larvae ( Wormaldia sp. and Hydropsyche siltalai ) and the median weight of stonefly prey. For small D. cephalotes , the density of H. siltalai and the percentage of moss cover were most important. Isoperla grammatica showed a significant correlation to blackfly density. Rhyacophila nubila occurred predominantly in patches with high prey biomass and with high densities and median weight of case less caddis larvae.
3. It was concluded that the quantity and quality of the prey, such as size, availability and species, influenced the predators'microdistribution. The distributional pattern differed between species of predators and was probably related to their different hunting strategies.     

The apparent diet of predators and biases due to different handling times of their prey

Summary In order to estimate the true diet of predators, the prey of a number of predators is recorded at one time. Such sampling underestimates the true diet during a period of time. Where handling times of different types of prey are very different, these estimates will be biased, because prey that take a relatively long time to be eaten will be overestimated. We examined a rocky intertidal predatorprey system and demonstrated the existence of such bias. A number of hypothetical correlates of the bias were also investigated. As anticipated, variations in handling times were a major factor, but neither taxonomic affinity nor absolute size of the prey could predict the degree of underestimation in the true diet for any given type of prey. A previously described correction for this type of bias was tested, but found to be unsatisfactory. We suggest that it was too insensitive to variability in handling times.A simple computer model incorporating differences among prey in their handling times was also unable to predict the bias, but did indicate that non-random selection of prey was occurring.We concluded that where such biases are likely to occur, information on the handling times of different prey and/or accurate estimates of the true diets of the predators are essential for the predatory interaction to be interpreted properly. These results were discussed in relation to published accounts of diets of predators in rocky intertidal habitats. Many studies have not presented data on handling times of prey in the field, and the magnitude and importance of potential biases in these studies are therefore difficult to assess.     

Population dynamics of thrips prey and their mite predators in a refuge

Prey refuges are expected to affect population dynamics, but direct experimental tests of this hypothesis are scarce. Larvae of western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis use the web produced by spider mites as a refuge from predation by the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris. Thrips incur a cost of using the refuge through reduced food quality within the web due to spider mite herbivory, resulting in a reduction of thrips developmental rate. These individual costs and benefits of refuge use were incorporated in a stage-structured predator-prey model developed for this system. The model predicted higher thrips numbers in presence than in absence of the refuge during the initial phase. A greenhouse experiment was carried out to test this prediction: the dynamics of thrips and their predators was followed on plants damaged by spider mites, either with or without web. Thrips densities in presence of predators were higher on plants with web than on unwebbed plants after 3 weeks. Experimental data fitted model predictions, indicating that individual-level measurements of refuge costs and benefits can be extrapolated to the level of interacting populations. Model-derived calculations of thrips population growth rate enable the estimation of the minimum predator density at which thrips benefit from using the web as a refuge. The model also predicted a minor effect of the refuge on the prey density at equilibrium, indicating that the effect of refuges on population dynamics hinges on the temporal scale considered.     

Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence

Avian predators learn to avoid defended insects on the basis of their conspicuous warning coloration. In many aposematic species, the level of chemical defence varies, with some individuals being more defended than others. Sequestration and production of defence chemicals is often costly and therefore less defended individuals enjoy the benefits of the warning signal without paying the full costs of chemical production. This is a fundamental theoretical problem for the evolutionary stability of aposematism, since less defended individuals appear to be at a selective advantage. However, if predators sample aposematic prey and selectively reject individuals on the basis of their chemical investment, aposematism could become evolutionarily stable. Previous research aimed at testing whether birds can use taste to discriminate between palatable and unpalatable prey has been confounded by other experimental factors. Here, we show that birds can taste and reject prey entirely on the basis of an individual's level of chemical defence and more importantly, they can make decisions on whether or not to consume a defended individual based upon their level of chemical investment. We discuss these results in relation to the evolution of aposematism, mimicry and defence chemistry.     

Adaptation of prey and predators between patches

Mathematical models are proposed to simulate migrations of prey and predators between patches. In the absence of predators, it is shown that the adaptation of prey leads to an ideal spatial distribution in the sense that the maximal capacity of each patch is achieved. With the introduction of co-adaptation of predators, it is proved that both prey and predators achieve ideal spatial distributions when the adaptations are weak. Further, it is shown that the adaptation of prey and predators increases the survival probability of predators from the extinction in both patches to the persistence in one patch. It is also demonstrated that there exists a pattern that prey and predators cooperate well through adaptations such that predators are permanent in every patch in the case that predators become extinct in each patch in the absence of adaptations. For strong adaptations, it is proved that the model admits periodic cycles and multiple stability transitions.     

On competition of predators and prey infection

A class of prey–predator models with infected prey is investigated. Predation terms are either of Holling type II or III, infection is either modelled by mass action or standard incidence. It is shown that the key for understanding the model behaviour is the competition of predators versus infection. In the presented models the predator is not susceptible to the infection and the infection of the prey has no influence on the ability of the predator of catching the prey. However, the prey population can be seen as a resource which both the predators and the infection depend on. The competition for this resource is strong—the principle of competitive exclusion holds for biologically meaningful choices of parameters as long as there is no destabilisation by a Hopf bifurcation. The representation of models in competition diagrams which are introduced in this article can be used for a wide range of competition models which seems to be a promising method with many potential applications.     

Synchronous and nonsynchronous population fluctuations of some predators and their prey in central Sweden

To test the alternative prey hypothesis (APH), we examined 29-yr time series of bank voles (indexed by snap-trapping) and 6 game species (indexed by bag records) from Gavleborg county, central Sweden, for the occurrence of synchronous population fluctuations Only voles and the 3 grouse species exhibited cyclic fluctuations, grouse fluctuations were highly synchronous, and positively correlated with vole fluctuations Although hares were positively correlated with grouse, they were negatively correlated with voles Fox were positively correlated with voles and grouse, however, a strong negative relationship was observed between fox and hares During a sharp decline in fox numbers during the early 1980's due to sarcoptic mange, both grouse and hares exhibited a strong positive numerical response, but, not in synchrony In addition, grouse exhibited large fluctuations during the fox decrease whereas hares did not Due to the contradictory predator-prey interactions observed, these results provide only partial support for APH     

Group dynamics: predators and prey get a little help from their friends

Transfer of information about predatory attacks between individuals allows schooling or flocking prey to evade predation without disrupting group integrity. But, predators can mitigate this effect by working together themselves.     

Detection of prey flocks by predators

The model presented by Vine (1971) to demonstrate a possible advantage of flocking behaviour in reducing predation risk made the unrealistic assumption that flocking would not affect the maximum distance at which a predator could just detect that an animal or animals were present. If flocking does reduce this distance it might yield a compensating disadvantage to prey animals, or an advantage to the predator. While quantification of these possibilities remains problematic in general, empirical data suggests that detection range depends on a simple power function of the number of individuals in a tight circular flock and their physical size. It is concluded that small flocks are likely to be advantageous to the predator and quite possibly disadvantageous to the prey, although the “selfish” advantage of flocking is likely to remain high for prey animals in medium or large sized flocks.     

Fish as predators and prey: DNA-based assessment of their role in food webs

Fish are both consumers and prey, and as such part of a dynamic trophic network. Measuring how they are trophically linked, both directly and indirectly, to other species is vital to comprehend the mechanisms driving alterations in fish communities in space and time. Moreover, this knowledge also helps to understand how fish communities respond to environmental change and delivers important information for implementing management of fish stocks. DNA-based methods have significantly widened our ability to assess trophic interactions in both marine and freshwater systems and they possess a range of advantages over other approaches in diet analysis. In this review we provide an overview of different DNA-based methods that have been used to assess trophic interactions of fish as consumers and prey. We consider the practicalities and limitations, and emphasize critical aspects when analysing molecular derived trophic data. We exemplify how molecular techniques have been employed to unravel food web interactions involving fish as consumers and prey. In addition to the exciting opportunities DNA-based approaches offer, we identify current challenges and future prospects for assessing fish food webs where DNA-based approaches will play an important role.     

Resource exchange and partner recognition mediate mutualistic interactions between prey and their would-be predators

Animals may develop mutualistic associations with other species, whereby prey offer resources or services in exchange for protection from predators. Alternatively, prey may offer resources or services directly to their would-be predators in exchange for their lives. The latter may be the case of hemipterans that engage in mutualistic interactions with ants by offering a honeydew reward. We test the extent to which a honeydew offering versus partner recognition may play a role as proximate mechanisms deterring ants from predating upon their hemipteran partners. We showed that, when presented with a choice between a hemipteran partner and an alternative prey type, mutualist ants were less likely to attack and more likely to remain probing their hemipteran partners. This occurred even in the absence of an immediate sugary reward, suggesting either an evolved or learned partner recognition response. To a similar extent, however, ants were also less likely to attack the alternative prey type when laced with honey as a proxy for a honeydew reward. This was the case even after the honey had been depleted, suggesting an ability of ants to recognize new potential sources of sugars. Either possibility suggests a degree of innate or learned partner recognition.     

Response of predators to prey abundance: separating the effects of prey density and patch size

We tested the relative and combined effects of prey density and patch size on the functional response (number of attacks per unit time and duration of attacks) of a predatory reef fish (Cheilodactylus nigripes (Richardson)) to their invertebrate prey. Fish attacked prey at a greater rate and for longer time in large than small patches of prey, but large patches had naturally greater densities of prey. We isolated the effects of patch size and prey density by reducing the density of prey in larger patches to equal that of small patches; thereby controlling for prey density. We found that the intensity at which fish attacked prey (combination of attack rate and duration) was primarily a response to prey density rather than the size of patch they occupied. However, there was evidence that fish spent more time foraging in larger than smaller patches independent of prey density; presumably because of the greater total number of prey available. These experimental observations suggest that fish can distinguish between different notions of prey abundance in ways that enhance their rate of consumption. Although fish may feed in a density dependent manner, a critical issue is whether their rate of consumption outstrips the rate of increase in prey abundance to cause density dependent mortality of prey.