miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphism is associated with cancer development among Asians and related to breast cancer susceptibility

To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphism (A>G) and cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 9 studies including 6,077 cases and 7,199 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significantly elevated cancer risk was associated with miR-499 G allele when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (AG vs. AA: OR?=?1.14, 95?% CI?=?0.98–1.32; GG vs. AA: OR?=?1.12, 95?% CI?=?0.95–1.33; dominant model: OR?=?1.13, 95?% CI?=?0.99–1.29; recessive model: OR?=?1.05, 95?% CI?=?0.83–1.33). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risk was only found for Asians (dominant model: OR?=?1.22, 95?% CI?=?1.02–1.46). When stratified by study design, no statistically significantly elevated risks were found in hospital-based studies or population-based studies. In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, significant cancer risk change was only found for breast cancer when miR-499 G allele was included (dominant model: OR?=?1.13, 95?% CI?=?1.01–1.26). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphism (A>G) is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development among Asians and may contribute to breast cancer susceptibility.     

Association between CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G polymorphism and systemic lupus erythematosus: an updated analysis

The results of studies on association between CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G (rs231775) polymorphism and susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus are controversial. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between the CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G polymorphism and SLE, a meta-analysis of 18 published case-control studies was performed. 18 studies meeting our inclusion criteria comprising 1806 SLE cases and 2,490 controls were included. The effect summary odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals were obtained. Publication bias was tested by funnel plot, Egger's test and heterogeneity was assessed. The combined results showed that there were significant differences in genotype distribution between SLE cases and control on the basis of all studies, GG versus AA (OR = 1.53, 95 % CI: 1.12-2.10), GG versus GA/AA (OR = 1.30, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.64), GG versus GA (OR = 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.55). When stratifying for the race, the phenomenon was found that SLE cases had a significantly higher frequency of GG/GA versus AA (OR = 1.58, 95 % CI: 1.23-2.03), GG versus AA (OR = 1.89, 95 % CI: 1.23-2.91), GG versus GA/AA(OR = 1.39, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.89), GA versus AA(OR = 1.38, 95 % CI: 1.06-1.80) and G versus A(OR = 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.07-1.67) than control in Asians. Our meta-analysis results suggest that CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G polymorphism might be a risk factor for SLE susceptibility, at least in Asians. The large sample and well-designed study based on different ethnic groups should be considered in future associated studies to clarify the association of CTLA-4 exon-1 +49A/G polymorphism with SLE susceptibility.     

Interleukin-12B rs3212227 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

IL-12 plays a very important role in the development and progress of cancer. IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism has been reported and many studies have focused on the role of this polymorphism in various cancers. However, the association between IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism and cancer risk remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic meta-analysis to estimate the overall cancer risk associated with this gene polymorphism and to quantify any potential between-study heterogeneity. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for case–control studies published up to April 1, 2012 that investigated IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism and cancer risk. Odds ratios (OR) with 95?% confidence intervals (95?% CI) were used to access the strength of this association. Heterogeneity among articles and publication bias were also verified. Ten studies with 2,954 cancer patients and 3,276 healthy controls were included. This meta-analysis showed that there was a significant association between IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism and overall cancer risk (CC/AC vs AA: OR?=?1.32, 95?% CI?=?1.06–1.63). When stratified by cancer type, we found a significant increased risk in cervical and nasopharyngeal cancer (OR?=?1.34, 95?% CI?=?1.04–1.73; OR?=?2.03, 95?% CI?=?1.57–2.63, respectively). In the stratified analysis, we also observed a similar association in population-based studies (OR?=?1.34, 95?% CI?=?1.00–1.80), Asian populations (OR?=?1.33, 95 % CI?=?1.06–1.67) and European populations (OR?=?1.54, 95 % CI?=?1.04–2.28). According to the results of our meta-analysis, IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism probably is associated with a high risk of cancer.     

Quantitative assessment of the association between TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism and cancer risk

The findings regarding the relation of transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) to cancer risk have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the association between TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. A meta-analysis of nine investigations with 2800 cases and 1620 controls was conducted to gain a better understanding of the effect of TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism on cancer risk. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the strength of the correlation between TAP2 gene polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. The pooled results from TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism showed a decreased risk of cancer in two dominant genetic models (GG + AG vs AA: OR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; AG vs AA: OR = 0.85, 95% CI, 0.73-0.99). From the subgroup analysis, decreased cancer susceptibility was found in Caucasians (GG + AG vs AA: OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.68-0.99), especially among the subgroup of cervical carcinoma (GG + AG vs AA: OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.96; AG vs AA: OR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.70-0.99). Overall, the results suggest that TAP2 rs241447 polymorphism contributes to decreased cancer susceptibility.     

Association of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 2518G/A gene polymorphism with diabetic nephropathy risk

Abstract

Results from the published studies on the association between monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) ?2518 A/G gene polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy (DN) risk are still conflicting. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between MCP-1 A/G gene polymorphism and DN risk and to explore whether MCP-1 A allele, AA genotype or GG genotype could become a predictive marker for DN risk. Association studies were identified from the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CBM-disc (China Biological Medicine Database) as of 1 March 2014, and eligible investigations were synthesized using meta-analysis method. Four studies were identified for the analysis of association between MCP-1 A/G gene polymorphism and DN risk, and all the included studies were form Asian population. The association between MCP-1 A/G gene polymorphism and DN susceptibility was not found (A allele: OR?=?1.19; 95% CI: 0.97–1.45; p?=?0.10; AA genotype: OR?=?1.27; 95% CI: 0.95–1.70; p?=?0.11; GG genotype: OR?=?0.77; 95% CI: 0.57–1.05; p?=?0.10). In the sensitive analysis, according to the control source from hospital, we found that AA genotype was associated with the DN risk (OR?=?1.45; 95% CI: 1.05–2.00; p?=?0.02). However, other associations were not found in the sensitive analysis according to the control source from hospital or population. Our results indicate that AA homozygous might be a significant genetic molecular marker to predict the diabetes mellitus patients developing into DN. However, more investigations are required to further clarify this association.     

Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms in cancer: a meta-analysis

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is critical in the recognition of Gram-negative bacteria serving as a key immune system effector. Recently, a number of case-control studies were conducted to investigate the association between TLR4 gene polymorphism and cancer risk, especially Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms. However, published data were still conflicting. In this paper, we summarized 9463 cancer cases and 10,825 controls from 22 studies and attempted to assess the susceptibility of TLR4 gene polymorphism to cancers by a synthetical meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the relationship. Our results suggested that Asp299Gly represented a risk factor on cancers in digestive system (G allele versus A allele, OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.02-2.64; GA+GG versus AA, OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.00-2.71) but tend to have a protective effect on prostate cancer (GG versus AA, OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.98; GG versus GA+AA, OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.98). Thr399Ile polymorphism was significantly associated with an elevated cancer risk in overall analysis (T allele versus C allele, OR=1.72, 95% CI: 1.27-2.33; TC versus CC, OR=1.63, 95% CI: 1.18-2.26; TT+TC versus CC, OR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.24-2.34) and especially in gastrointestinal subgroup (T allele versus C allele, OR=2.01, 95% CI: 1.40-2.89; TC versus CC, OR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.26-2.74; TT+TC versus CC, OR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.35-2.88). Further prospective researches with larger numbers of worldwide participants are warranted to draw comprehensive and true conclusions.     

Meta-analysis of epidermal growth factor polymorphisms and cancer risk: involving 9,779 cases and 15,932 controls

The epidermal growth factor (EGF) pathway stimulates proliferation and differentiation of epidermal and epithelial tissues, and plays an important role in tumorigenesis. The association between EGF polymorphisms and cancer risk is controversial; thus, we performed this meta-analysis. Overall, 41 case-control studies with 9,779 cases and 15,932 controls were retrieved. We found that EGF +61A/G polymorphism increased overall cancer risk (G allele vs. A allele: OR=1.181, 95% CI=1.077-1.295, P(heterogeneity) < 0.001; GG vs. AA: OR=1.370, 95% CI=1.143-1.641, P(heterogeneity) < 0.001; GG+GA vs. AA: OR=1.175, 95% CI=1.047-1.318, P(heterogeneity) < 0.001). In the stratified analysis by cancer type, the +61?G allele was a risk factor for colorectal cancer, esophageal carcinoma, gastric cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Individuals who carried +61G allele had higher cancer susceptibility in mixed and European racial subgroups. An increased association was detected in the hospital-based subgroup. No significant association was found among EGF -1380A/G, -1744G/A, rs6983267T/G polymorphisms and cancer risk.     

Relationship between Interleukin-10 ?1082A/G Polymorphism and Risk of Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

To analyze the association between −1082A/G polymorphism in interleukin-10 (IL-10) gene and ischemic stroke (IS) risk by meta-analysis.

Methods

We carried out a systematic electronic search in PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, Science Direct, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Database, Weipu database and WANGFANG Database. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated to assess the strength of the association.

Results

7 studies were included. There was no significant association between IL-10 −1082A/G polymorphism and IS risk under all genetic models in overall estimates (A vs. G: OR = 1.23,95%CI = 0.85–1.79;AA vs. GG: OR = 1.01,95%CI = 0.47–2.19; AG vs. GG: OR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.38–1.55; AA+AG vs. GG: OR = 0.89,95%CI = 0.46–1.73; AA vs. AG+GG: OR = 1.39, 95%CI = 0.91–2.13). Similarly, no associations were found in subgroup analysis based on ethnicity and source of controls. However, removing the study deviating from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) produced statistically significant associations for overall estimates under recessive model(AA VS. AG+GG OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.04–2.42) and among Asians in all genetic models (A VS.G OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.07–2.53; AA vs. GG OR1.91, 95% CI 1.31–2.80; AG vs. GG OR1.44, 95% CI 1.09–1.91; AA+AG vs. GG OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.18–2.01;AA VS. AG+GG OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.07–3.00). Even after Bonferroni correction, the associations were observed still significantly in Asians under the two models (AA vs. GG OR1.91, 95% CI 1.31–2.80, P = 0.0008; AA+AG vs. GG OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.18–2.01, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicates that IL10 −1082 A/G polymorphism is associated with IS susceptibility in Asians and the −1082 A allele may increase risk of IS in Asians. Considering the sample size is small and between-study heterogeneity is remarkable, more studies with subtle design are warranted in future.     

Association Study of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in XRCC1 Gene with the Risk of Gastric Cancer in Chinese Population

Gastric cancer is one of highly cancer-related deaths in the world. Previous evidence suggests that the X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 gene (XRCC1) is one of the most important candidate genes for influencing gastric cancer risk. The objective of this study was to detect the potential association of genetic variants in XRCC1 gene with gastric cancer risk in Chinese Han population. In total, we enrolled 395 gastric cancer patients and 398 cancer-free controls in this study. The genotyping of c.910A>G and c.1804C>A genetic variants in XRCC1 gene were investigate by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and created restriction site-PCR (CRS-PCR) methods, respectively. We found the genotypes/alleles from these two genetic variants were statistically associated with the increased risk of gastric cancer (for c.910A>G, GG versus (vs.) AA: OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.21-3.31; AG vs. AA: OR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.12-2.02; GG/AG vs. AA: OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.20-2.10; GG vs. AG/AA: OR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.73; G vs. A: OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.18-1.83; for c.1804C>A, AA vs. CC: OR = 2.68, 95% CI 1.46-4.94; AA vs. CA/CC: OR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.44-4.76; A vs. C: OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.66). The allele-G of c.910A>G and allele-A of c.1804C>A genetic variants may contribute to gastric cancer susceptibility. These preliminary results indicate that these XRCC1 genetic variants are potentially related to gastric cancer susceptibility in Chinese Han population, and might be used as molecular markers.     

Quantitative analysis of the association between interleukin-10 1082A/G polymorphism and susceptibility to sepsis

There are some epidemiological studies investigating the association between interleukin-10 (IL-10) 1082A/G polymorphism and sepsis susceptibility reporting conflicting findings. Our work tried to further quantitatively assess the association of the IL-10 1082A/G polymorphism with sepsis susceptibility through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of eleven studies with 2,528 subjects were finally included into the meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were calculated with random-effects model or fixed-effects model based on the heterogeneity among the included studies. Meta-analysis of all 11 studies showed that there was an obvious association between IL-10 1082A/G polymorphism and sepsis susceptibility under the allele comparison model (G vs A) and the codominant model (GG vs AA) (for G vs A: OR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.72–0.96, P = 0.011; for GG vs AA: OR = 0.67, 95 % CI 0.47–0.96, P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed that there was an obvious association between IL-10-1082A/G polymorphism and sepsis susceptibility in Asians under three comparison models (for G vs A: OR = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.62–0.91, P = 0.004; for GG vs AA: OR = 0.39, 95 % CI 0.21–0.73, P = 0.003; for GG vs AA/AG: OR = 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14–0.92, P = 0.032), but there was no similar association in Caucasians under all four comparison models. Our meta-analysis reveals that the IL-10-1082A/G polymorphism has an association with the susceptibility to sepsis in Asian populations. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of IL-10-1082A/G polymorphism on sepsis susceptibility in Caucasians.     

Glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism and bladder cancer susceptibility: an updated analysis

Studies investigating the association between glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene polymorphism and bladder cancer (BC) risk have reported conflicting results. In order to clarify the effect of GSTP1 polymorphism on the BC susceptibility, we conducted an updated system review of published epidemiology studies to provide more precise evidence. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). 20 studies with 4,428 BC cases and 5,457 controls were identified. The combined analyses based on all studies showed that there was a significant difference in the genotype distribution in GSTP1(A313G) polymorphism between BC cases and controls not only in Asians (GG vs. AA?+?AG, OR?=?1.59, 95?% CI?=?1.01?C2.51) but also in Caucasians (GG vs. AA?+?AG, OR?=?1.51, 95?% CI?=?1.11?C2.06). Upon stratification for smoking status, we observed no statistically significant difference in genotype distribution of GSTP1 in ever-smokers. Combination of the high-risk genotypes (GSTM1 null?+?GSTT1 null?+?GSTP1 313 A/G or G/G) demonstrated further increase in the BC risk (OR?=?6.64, 95?%CI?=?3.63?C12.16). This meta-analysis suggests that GSTP1 313 G/G polymorphism is a strong predisposing risk factor for BC.     

Polymorphisms in the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 gene and acute rejection risk in transplant recipients

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) gene polymorphisms have been reported to influence the risk for acute rejection (AR) in transplant recipients. However, the results still remain controversial and ambiguous. The objective of the current study was to conduct a meta-analysis investigating the association between polymorphisms in the CTLA-4 gene and the risk of AR in transplant recipients. Electronic searches for all publications were conducted on associations between this variant and acute rejection in Medline and Embase databases through November 2011. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the strength of the association. Three polymorphisms (+49 adenine/guanine [+49A/G], -318 cytosine/thymine [-318C/T], and the +6230G/A polymorphism [CT60]) in 18 case-control studies from ten articles were analyzed. This meta-analysis included 2,081 cases of transplant recipients in which 813 cases developed AR and 1,268 cases did not develop AR. The results indicated that there was no statistically significant association between the risk of AR and the +49A/G polymorphism or the -318C/T polymorphism (+49A/G: OR = 0.876, 95 % CI = 0.650-1.180 for GG vs. AA; OR = 1.121, 95 % CI = 0.911-1.379 for AG + GG vs. AA; -318C/T: OR = 0.397, 95 % CI = 0.138-1.143 for TT vs. CC; OR = 0.987, 95 %CI = 0.553-1.760 for CT + TT vs. CC). However, individuals who carried CT60 A allele might have a decreased risk of AR (AA vs. GG OR = 0.535, 95 % CI = 0.340-0.841, A vs. G OR = 0.759, 95 % CI = 0.612-0.914) in liver transplant recipients among Europeans, but because only two studies were included, so the result should be caution. In further stratified analyses for the +49A/G and the -318C/T polymorphisms, no obvious significant associations were found in subgroups of renal transplant recipients and Europeans, a reduced incidence of acute rejection was observed in liver transplant recipients that are homogenous for +49G (OR = 0.638, 95 % CI = 0.427-0.954 for GG vs. AA/AG), while this has not been observed in renal transplant recipients. Overall this meta-analysis suggests that +49A/G and the -318C/T polymorphisms in CTLA-4 may be not associated with the risk of rejection after organ transplantation, but CTLA +49A/G and +6230G/A polymorphisms may be associated with acute rejection after liver transplantation, not after renal transplantation. In future, more studies should be included to evaluate the association between +6230G/A polymorphism and AR risk.     

Meta-analysis of MCP-1 promoter ?2518 A/G polymorphism and SLE susceptibility

The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize results on the association of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1(MCP-1) promoter -2518 A/G polymorphism with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) susceptibility. We searches all the publications about the association between MCP-1 promoter -2518 A/G polymorphism and SLE from Pubmed, Elsevier Science Direct, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure. The meta-analysis was performed for genotypes AA verse GG, AA+AG verse GG, AA verse AG+GG, and A allele verse G allele in a fixed/random effect model. A total of 14 studies (2,333 cases and 2,391 controls) were included in the meta-analysis. When all groups were pooled, we had not observed significant association between A allele and G allele (OR = 0.94, 95 %CI = 0.79-1.12, P = 0.50). When analysis were restricted to more ethnically homogeneous populations, the similar results were found in European population and Asian population (OR = 1.05, 95 %CI = 0.75-1.46, P = 0.80; OR = 1.00, 95 %CI = 0.86-1.17, P = 0.99). However, we had not detected a significant association between MCP-1 promoter -2518 A/G polymorphism and SLE when examining the genotypes AA verse GG, AA+AG verse GG, AA verse AG+GG. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate the association between MCP-1 promoter -2518 A/G polymorphism and SLE.     

The cumulative effects of polymorphisms in the DNA mismatch repair genes and tobacco smoking in oesophageal cancer risk

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) enzymes repair errors in DNA that occur during normal DNA metabolism or are induced by certain cancer-contributing exposures. We assessed the association between 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 5 MMR genes and oesophageal cancer risk in South Africans. Prior to genotyping, SNPs were selected from the HapMap database, based on their significantly different genotypic distributions between European ancestry populations and four HapMap populations of African origin. In the Mixed Ancestry group, the MSH3 rs26279 G/G versus A/A or A/G genotype was positively associated with cancer (OR?=?2.71; 95% CI: 1.34-5.50). Similar associations were observed for PMS1 rs5742938 (GG versus AA or AG: OR?=?1.73; 95% CI: 1.07-2.79) and MLH3 rs28756991 (AA or GA versus GG: OR?=?2.07; 95% IC: 1.04-4.12). In Black individuals, however, no association between MMR polymorhisms and cancer risk was observed in individual SNP analysis. The interactions between MMR genes were evaluated using the model-based multifactor-dimensionality reduction approach, which showed a significant genetic interaction between SNPs in MSH2, MSH3 and PMS1 genes in Black and Mixed Ancestry subjects, respectively. The data also implies that pathogenesis of common polymorphisms in MMR genes is influenced by exposure to tobacco smoke. In conclusion, our findings suggest that common polymorphisms in MMR genes and/or their combined effects might be involved in the aetiology of oesophageal cancer.     

Associations between tumor necrosis factor alpha gene polymorphism and sarcoidosis: a meta-analysis

Published studies regarding the association between tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) gene polymorphism and sarcoidosis risk are inconsistent. In order to clarify this association, we performed a meta-analysis of case–control studies with available data. PubMed, EMBASE and BIOSIS Previews were comprehensively searched to identify relevant studies. Twelve case–control studies in 11 articles involving 3,218 participants were included in the meta-analysis to assess the association between TNF-α gene polymorphism and susceptibility to sarcoidosis. We estimated the pooled odds ratio (OR) with its 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) to explore the potential association. Our meta-analysis results suggested that TNF-α-308G/A AA/AG genotype increased sarcoidosis risk, in Asian and Caucasian ethnicity, and in sarcoidosis with Löfgren syndrome. No association was found between TNF-α-238G/A, TNF-α-857C/T polymorphism and sarcoidosis risk. In conclusion, our meta-analysis indicated that AG/GG genotype of TNF-α-308G/A are associated with increased sarcoidosis risk.     

MTHFR C677T polymorphism contributes to colorectal cancer susceptibility: evidence from 61 case–control studies

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is believed to be involved in folate metabolism which plays a critical role in carcinogenesis. To date, many case-control studies have investigated the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk. However, the results were inconsistent. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the association, we conducted this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis recruited 61 published studies which were selected by a search of PubMed up to 31st September 2011, including 16,111 colorectal cancer cases and 23,192 controls. We used crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95?% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility. Our results showed that MTHFR C667T polymorphism contributed to the decreased colorectal cancer risk in overall population (for TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.89, 95?% CI?=?0.82-0.97; for TT vs. CT/CC: OR?=?0.88, 95?% CI?=?0.83-0.92). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, the results also indicated a correlation between the T allele of MTHFR C667T and the colorectal cancer risk in Asian population (for TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.82, 95?% CI?=?0.69-0.97; for TT vs. CT/CC: OR?=?0.81, 95?% CI?=?0.74-0.90). Additionally, the correlation was also observed in male subgroup in sub-analysis by gender (for TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.82, 95?% CI?=?0.71-0.93; for TT vs. CT/CC: OR?=?0.81, 95?% CI?=?0.71-0.92). In summary, our meta-analysis strongly indicated the MTHFR C667T polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of CRC.     

Distinct Role of CD86 Polymorphisms (rs1129055, rs17281995) in Risk of Cancer: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Background and Purpose

Previous studies concerning the role of CD86 polymorphisms (rs1129055 and rs17281995) in cancer fail to provide compelling evidence. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of common polymorphisms in the risk of cancer by meta-analysis.

Methods

By using the search terms Cluster of Differentiation 86/CD86/B7-2/polymorphism/polymorphisms/cancer, we searched PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang and identified four studies for rs1129055 (2137 subjects) and rs17281995 (2856 subjects) respectively. Cancer risk was estimated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Major Findings

Overall, we observed significant reduced risk of cancer in relation to rs1129055. Compared with the individuals with AA genotype, the individuals with GG genotype appeared to have 62% decreased risk to develop cancer (GG versus AA: OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49–0.79; P_het., 0.996). Similar effects were indicated in the G versus A allele model and the GG versus GA+AA genetic model (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74–0.93; P_het., 0.987; OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50–0.79; P_het., 0.973). In addition, we found genotypes of rs17281995 had a major effect on overall cancer risk (CC versus GG: OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43–3.95; P_het., 0.433; C versus G: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06–1.43; P_het., 0.521; CC versus GC+GG: OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.45–3.93; P_het., 0.443). The association was also observed in Caucasians and colorectal cancer. No obvious publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis.

Conclusions

These data reveal that rs1129055 may have protective effects on cancer risk in Asians and that rs17281995 is likely to contribute to risk of cancer, particularly colorectal cancer in Caucasians.     

Polymorphism of vascular endothelial growth factor −1154G>A (rs1570360) with cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 16 case–control studies

Published data on the association of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) −1154G>A polymorphism with cancer risk is inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of association between VEGF −1154G>A polymorphism and the risk of cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of 7,071 cancer cases and 7,693 controls from 16 published case–control studies. Our meta-analysis didn’t reveal an association between VEGF −1154G>A polymorphism and overall cancer risk (GG vs. AA: OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.96–1.20; GA vs. AA: OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.93–1.17; recessive model: GG+GA vs. AA: OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95–1.18; dominant model: GG vs. GA+AA, OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00–1.24). Nevertheless, for non-Caucasians, GG homozygote may have higher cancer risk compared with either A carriers (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.12–2.23) or AA homozygote (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17–1.76). No significant heterogeneity was detected except in the dominant model and “prostate cancer” subgroup analysis. More studies with larger samples are warranted to confirm these findings.     

MTHFR polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) have been reported to alter the risk of ovarian cancer. However, the results are still inconclusive. For better understanding of the effect of these two polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. An extensive search was performed to identify all case–control studies investigating such association. The strength of association between these two polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk was assessed by odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95?% confidence interval (95?% CI). 3,496 cases and 3,631 controls for C677T polymorphism and 3,280 cases and 3,346 controls for A1298C polymorphism were included in this meta-analysis. The results suggested that there were no significant associations between C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk in overall comparisons in all genetic models (For C677T: TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.94, 95?% CI?=?0.71–1.24, P?=?0.65; CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.03, 95?% CI?=?0.93–1.14, P?=?0.57; TT/CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.01, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.16, P?=?0.87; TT vs. CC/CT: OR?=?0.93, 95?% CI?=?0.72–1.20, P?=?0.58. For A1298C: CC vs. AA: OR?=?1.05, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.25, P?=?0.65; CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.98, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.08, P?=?0.66; CC/CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.99, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.09, P?=?0.85; CC vs. AA/CA: OR?=?1.06, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.26, P?=?0.46). Subgroup analysis based on ethnicities and influence analysis did not perturb the results. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are not associated with ovarian cancer risk, especially in Caucasians.