Polycomb-Group Proteins and FLOWERING LOCUS T Maintain Commitment to Flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana

The switch from vegetative to reproductive growth is extremely stable even if plants are only transiently exposed to environmental stimuli that trigger flowering. In the photoperiodic pathway, a mobile signal, florigen, encoded by FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) in Arabidopsis thaliana, induces flowering. Because FT activity in leaves is not maintained after transient photoperiodic induction, the molecular basis for stable floral commitment is unclear. Here, we show that Polycomb-group (Pc-G) proteins, which mediate epigenetic gene regulation, maintain the identity of inflorescence and floral meristems after floral induction. Thus, plants with reduced Pc-G activity show a remarkable increase of cauline leaves under noninductive conditions and floral reversion when shifted from inductive to noninductive conditions. These phenotypes are almost completely suppressed by loss of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE, which both delay flowering and promote vegetative shoot identity. Upregulation of FLC in Pc-G mutants leads to a strong decrease of FT expression in inflorescences. We find that this activity of FT is needed to prevent floral reversion. Collectively, our results reveal that floral meristem identity is at least partially maintained by a daylength-independent role of FT whose expression is indirectly sustained by Pc-G activity.     

BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT), a member of the FT/TFL1 family,shows distinct pattern of expression during the vegetative growth of Arabidopsis

Transition to the flowering stage is precisely controlled by a few classes of regulatory molecules. BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT) is a member of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) family, an important class of flower development regulators with unidentified biochemical function. BFT has a TFL1-like activity and plays a role in axillary inflorescence development. To elucidate the expression pattern of BFT, we analyzed the subcellular localization and conditional expression of BFT in this study. We generated 35S::BFT:GFP plants to investigate the subcellular localization of BFT protein. 35S::BFT:GFP plants showed late flowering, similarly as did 35S::BFT plants. BFT:GFP fusion protein was localized in the nucleus and the plasma membrane, which was different from the localization pattern of FT and TFL1. BFT expression was induced by abiotic stress conditions. ABA, drought, and osmotic stress treatments induced BFT expression, whereas cold, salt, and heat stress conditions did not, suggesting that BFT plays a role in regulating flowering time and inflorescence structure under drought conditions. The induction pattern of BFT was different from those of other FT/TFL1 family genes. Our studies indicated that BFT showed a distinct expression pattern from its homologous genes during the vegetative growth in Arabidopsis.Key words: flowering time, flowering locus T, terminal flower 1, brother of FT and TFL1, abiotic stress, subcellullar localizationThe FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) family is a small gene family whose members play a pivotal role in flower development in Arabidopsis. The family includes FT, TFL1, TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF), Arabidopsis thaliana CENTRORADIALIS homologue (ATC), MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (MFT) and BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT).^{3,5,6,9,15,17} FT is a floral promoter that integrates signal inputs from various pathways that regulate flowering time in Arabidopsis.^5,6 TFL1 plays an antagonistic role to that of FT, functioning as a floral inhibitor. Unlike FT, TFL1 also plays an important role in controlling plant architecture by regulating the expression of LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1), two important floral meristem identity genes in the shoot apical meristem (SAM).^3,7 TSF regulates flowering by a mechanism similar to that of FT, although a lesion in TSF does not have an apparent effect on the determination of flowering time. MFT has a weak FT-like activity.¹⁷ ATC acts as a floral repressor, and its role is similar to that of TFL1.⁹ Finally, BFT has a TFL1-like activity, in spite of its amino acid homology to FT,^2,4,16 and functions redundantly with TFL1 in inflorescence meristem development in Arabidopsis.¹⁶ Although genetic studies elucidated an intricate role of the FT/TFL1 family genes, not much is known about the expression pattern of the remaining members except FT and TFL1. Here, we report that BFT expression showed a distinct pattern from its homologous genes during the vegetative phase. BFT:GFP fusion protein was detected in the nucleus and the plasma membrane. BFT expression was induced by abiotic stress conditions, distinct from other FT/TFL1 family genes, raising the possibility that BFT plays a role in regulating flowering time and inflorescence structure under drought conditions.     

Isolation and functional characterization of the FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog, the LsFT gene, in lettuce

High temperature-induced bolting of lettuce is undesirable agriculturally, making it important to find the mechanism governing the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth. FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) genes play important roles in the induction of flowering in several plant species. To clarify floral induction in lettuce, we isolated the FT gene (LsFT) from lettuce. Sequence analysis and phylogenetic relationships of LsFT revealed considerable homology to FT genes of Arabidopsis, tomato, and other species. LsFT induced early flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis, but was not completely effective compared to AtFT. LsFT mRNA was abundant in the largest leaves under flowering-inducible conditions (higher temperatures). Gene expression was correlated with flower differentiation of the shoot apical meristem. Our results suggest that LsFT is a putative FT homolog in lettuce that regulates flower transition, similar to its homolog in Arabidopsis. This is the first information on the lettuce floral gene for elucidating regulation of the flowering transition in lettuce.     

SHB1 plays dual roles in photoperiodic and autonomous flowering

Flowering was initiated by the integration of environmental signals such as day-length with the internal development status in Arabidopsis, a facultative long-day plant. The photoperiodic flowering involves two key components, CONSTANS and FT, whereas the autonomous flowering is operated through a central quantitative floral repressor, FLC, and several other genes that act upstream of FLC. SOC1 acts downstream to integrate the flowering signals from the two pathways. Here, we report that SHB1 plays dual roles in both photoperiodic and autonomous flowering. shb1-D, a gain-of-function mutant, flowered early and shb1, a loss-of-function allele, flowered late under both long days and short days. The shb1-D mutation activated the expression of CO, FT, and SOC1 under both long and short days, and however, the co-2 mutation attenuated the shb1-D activated expression of FT and SOC1 only under long days but not short days. The shb1-D or shb1 mutations also reduced and increased, respectively, the expression of FLC under both long and short days. Transgenic remedy of FLC to wide-type level in shb1-D background also reverted shb1-D flowering and FT or SOC1 expression to wild type mostly under short days. Furthermore, the shb1-D suppression on FLC expression is likely operated through LD as ld-3 blocked this suppression and SHB1 appears to act upstream of LD. In summary, SHB1 represents signaling steps that regulate CO expression in leaves and LD or FLC expression in either leaves or shoot apical meristem, contributing to a threshold expression of SOC1 in shoot apical meristem for floral initiation.     

Reduction of the geomagnetic field delays Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time through downregulation of flowering‐related genes

Variations in magnetic field (MF) intensity are known to induce plant morphological and gene expression changes. In Arabidopsis thaliana Col‐0, near‐null magnetic field (NNMF, i.e., <100 nT MF) causes a delay in the transition to flowering, but the expression of genes involved in this response has been poorly studied. Here, we showed a time‐course quantitative analysis of the expression of both leaf (including clock genes, photoperiod pathway, GA20ox, SVP, and vernalization pathway) and floral meristem (including GA2ox, SOC1, AGL24, LFY, AP1, FD, and FLC) genes involved in the transition to flowering in A. thaliana under NNMF. NNMF induced a delayed flowering time and a significant reduction of leaf area index and flowering stem length, with respect to controls under geomagnetic field. Generation experiments (F₁‐ and F₂‐NNMF) showed retention of flowering delay. The quantitative expression (qPCR) of some A. thaliana genes expressed in leaves and floral meristem was studied during transition to flowering. In leaves and flowering meristem, NNMF caused an early downregulation of clock, photoperiod, gibberellin, and vernalization pathways and a later downregulation of TSF, AP1, and FLC. In the floral meristem, the downregulation of AP1, AGL24, FT, and FLC in early phases of floral development was accompanied by a downregulation of the gibberellin pathway. The progressive upregulation of AGL24 and AP1 was also correlated to the delayed flowering by NNMF. The flowering delay is associated with the strong downregulation of FT, FLC, and GA20ox in the floral meristem and FT, TSF, FLC, and GA20ox in leaves. Bioelectromagnetics. 39:361–374, 2018. © 2018 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT) has TFL1‐like activity and functions redundantly with TFL1 in inflorescence meristem development in Arabidopsis

The FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) family is a small gene family that encodes important regulators that control flower development in Arabidopsis. Here, we investigated the biological role of the product of BROTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (BFT), a member of this family, whose function remains unknown. Comparison of the critical residues that play a role in distinguishing FT‐ or TFL1‐like activity revealed that BFT is more similar to FT. Similar to FT expression, BFT expression showed a diurnal oscillation pattern, peaking in the evening. In situ hybridization revealed BFT expression in the shoot apical meristem, young leaf and axillary inflorescence meristem. Transgenic plants over‐expressing BFT exhibited delayed flowering and severe floral defects (floral indeterminacy and compact inflorescences surrounded by serrate leaves), similar to 35S::TFL1 plants. LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) expression was significantly reduced in 35S::BFT plants. BFT over‐expression failed to rescue the terminal flower phenotype of tfl1 mutants; however, it delayed both terminal flower formation in the primary inflorescence and axillary inflorescence development in the tfl1 mutant background. Consistent with this, the loss‐of‐function BFT alleles, bft‐2 and an BFT RNAi line, accelerated termination of the primary inflorescence and formation of axillary inflorescences in the tfl1 mutant background. Taken together, our results suggest that, despite similarities in the critical residues of BFT and FT, BFT possesses a TFL1‐like activity and functions redundantly with TFL1 in inflorescence meristem development, and possibly contributes to the regulation of plant architecture.     

The flowering-time geneFT and regulation of flowering inArabidopsis

Transition from vegetative to reproductive development (flowering) is one of the most important decisions during the post-embryonic development of flowering plants. More than twenty loci are known to regulate this process inArabidopsis. Some of these flowering-time genes may act at the shoot apical meristem to regulate its competence to respond to floral inductive signals and floral evocation. Genetic and phenotypic analyses of mutants suggest that the late-flowering geneFT may be a good candidate for such genes. To test this, we have cloned theFT gene using aFT-deficiency line associated with a T-DNA insertion. Cloned genes and loss-of-function mutants in hand, it is now possible to analyse the role ofFT and other genes in flowering at the biochemical and cellular levels as well as at the genetic level. The deduced FT protein has homology with TFL1 and CEN proteins believed to be involved in regulation of inflorescence meristem identity. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that theFT group and theTFL1/CEN group of genes diverged before the diversification of major angiosperm clades. This raises the interesting question of the evolutionary relationship between the regulation of vegetative/reproductive switching in the shoot apical meristem and the regulation of inflorescence architecture in angiosperms. The extended abstract of a paper presented at the 13th International Symposium in Conjugation with Award of the International Prize for Biology “Fronitier of Plant Biology”     

Fruit load modulates flowering-related gene expression in buds of alternate-bearing ‘Moncada’ mandarin

Background and Aims

Gene determination of flowering is the result of complex interactions involving both promoters and inhibitors. In this study, the expression of flowering-related genes at the meristem level in alternate-bearing citrus trees is analysed, together with the interplay between buds and leaves in the determination of flowering.

Methods

First defruiting experiments were performed to manipulate blossoming intensity in ‘Moncada’ mandarin, Citrus clementina. Further defoliation was performed to elucidate the role leaves play in the flowering process. In both cases, the activity of flowering-related genes was investigated at the flower induction (November) and differentiation (February) stages.

Key Results

Study of the expression pattern of flowering-genes in buds from on (fully loaded) and off (without fruits) trees revealed that homologues of FLOWERING LOCUS T (CiFT), TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF), APETALA1 (CsAP1) and LEAFY (CsLFY) were negatively affected by fruit load. CiFT and TSF activities showed a marked increase in buds from off trees through the study period (ten-fold in November). By contrast, expression of the homologues of the flowering inhibitors of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (CsTFL), TERMINAL FLOWER 2 (TFL2) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) was generally lower in off trees. Regarding floral identity genes, the increase in CsAP1 expression in off trees was much greater in buds than in leaves, and significant variations in CsLFY expression (approx. 20 %) were found only in February. Defoliation experiments further revealed that the absence of leaves completely abolished blossoming and severely affected the expression of most of the flowering-related genes, particularly decreasing the activity of floral promoters and of CsAP1 at the induction stage.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the presence of fruit affects flowering by greatly altering gene-expression not only at the leaf but also at the meristem level. Although leaves are required for flowering to occur, their absence strongly affects the activity of floral promoters and identity genes.     

Initiation of Flowering in Protea compacta × Protea neriifolia Hybrid ‘Carnival’ Coincides with Expression of the FLOWERING LOCUS T Homologue

The Protea hybrid ‘Carnival’ (Protea compacta × Protea neriifolia) is responsive to seasonal change, arresting growth during the winter and producing flowers in the late summer after initiating flowering during the elongation of the spring flush. The large commercially attractive flower heads, consisting of over 200 florets, develop over a period of months. To begin to better understand the molecular factors that influence the transition to flowering in Protea, a homologue of the FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) gene, ProFT, was isolated from ‘Carnival’, and its expression was analysed. ProFT showed increased expression in ‘Carnival’ leaves during October (13 h light/11 h dark; average daily temperature of 17 °C) at the time that floral organs were being pre-formed in the meristem. ProFT expression was fivefold higher in florally determined buds compared to that in leaves, and low levels were present in the vegetative meristems analysed. These results suggest that ProFT may act as a seasonally regulated floral inducer in ‘Carnival’, but based on spatial expression, data is also likely to play a role in inflorescence development and growth architecture.     

Regulation of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">ALBINO3</Emphasis>-mediated transition to flowering in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis> depends on the expression of <Emphasis Type="Italic">CO</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">GA1</Emphasis>

ALBINO3, a homologue of PPF1 in Arabidopsis, encodes a chloroplast protein, and is essential for chloroplast differentiation. In the present study, ALBINO3(−) transgenic plants exhibited a significant decrease in both the number of rosette leaves at bolting and the days before bolting, suggesting the important roles of ALBINO3 in regulating flowering during non-inductive short-day photoperiods. ALBINO3 mRNA was apparently accumulated in shoot apical meristem and floral meristems around the shoot apical meristem in wild-type plants. ALBINO3 might be predominantly involved in inducing the floral repression pathway by activating the expression of TFL1, and by suppressing the expression of LFY, respectively, in the shoot apical meristem. Moreover, the function of ALBINO3 in regulating flowering transition depended on the expression of CO and GA1, because ALBINO3 might function in the downstream integration of the photoperiod-dependent and the photoperiod-independent pathways. These results suggest that ALBINO3 may have an important integrative function in the flowering process in Arabidopsis.     

Stress and salicylic acid induce the expression of PnFT2 in the regulation of the stress-induced flowering of Pharbitis nil

Poor nutrition and low temperature stress treatments induced flowering in the Japanese morning glory Pharbitis nil (synonym Ipomoea nil) cv. Violet. The expression of PnFT2, one of two homologs of the floral pathway integrator gene FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), was induced by stress, whereas the expression of both PnFT1 and PnFT2 was induced by a short-day treatment. There was no positive correlation between the flowering response and the homolog expression of another floral pathway integrator gene SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO1 and genes upstream of PnFT, such as CONSTANS. In another cultivar, Tendan, flowering and PnFT2 expression were not induced by poor nutrition stress. Aminooxyacetic acid (AOA), a phenylalanine ammonia-lyase inhibitor, inhibited the flowering and PnFT2 expression induced by poor nutrition stress in Violet. Salicylic acid (SA) eliminated the inhibitory effects of AOA. SA enhanced PnFT2 expression under the poor nutrition stress but not under non-stress conditions. These results suggest that SA induces PnFT2 expression, which in turn induces flowering; SA on its own, however, may not be sufficient for induction.     

Gibberellic acid signaling is required for ambient temperature‐mediated induction of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana

Distinct molecular mechanisms integrate changes in ambient temperature into the genetic pathways that govern flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Temperature‐dependent eviction of the histone variant H2A.Z from nucleosomes has been suggested to facilitate the expression of FT by PIF4 at elevated ambient temperatures. Here we show that, in addition to PIF4, PIF3 and PIF5, but not PIF1 and PIF6, can promote flowering when expressed specifically in phloem companion cells (PCC), where they can induce FT and its close paralog, TSF. However, despite their strong potential to promote flowering, genetic analyses suggest that the PIF genes seem to have only a minor role in adjusting flowering in response to photoperiod or high ambient temperature. In addition, loss of PIF function only partially suppressed the early flowering phenotype and FT expression of the arp6 mutant, which is defective in H2A.Z deposition. In contrast, the chemical inhibition of gibberellic acid (GA) biosynthesis resulted in a strong attenuation of early flowering and FT expression in arp6. Furthermore, GA was able to induce flowering at low temperature (15°C) independently of FT, TSF, and the PIF genes, probably directly at the shoot apical meristem. Together, our results suggest that the timing of the floral transition in response to ambient temperature is more complex than previously thought and that GA signaling might play a crucial role in this process.     

The Fragaria vesca Homolog of SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 Represses Flowering and Promotes Vegetative Growth

In the annual long-day plant Arabidopsis thaliana, SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 (SOC1) integrates endogenous and environmental signals to promote flowering. We analyzed the function and regulation of the SOC1 homolog (Fragaria vesca [Fv] SOC1) in the perennial short-day plant woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). We found that Fv SOC1 overexpression represses flower initiation under inductive short days, whereas its silencing causes continuous flowering in both short days and noninductive long days, similar to mutants in the floral repressor Fv TERMINAL FLOWER1 (Fv TFL1). Molecular analysis of these transgenic lines revealed that Fv SOC1 activates Fv TFL1 in the shoot apex, leading to the repression of flowering in strawberry. In parallel, Fv SOC1 regulates the differentiation of axillary buds to runners or axillary leaf rosettes, probably through the activation of gibberellin biosynthetic genes. We also demonstrated that Fv SOC1 is regulated by photoperiod and Fv FLOWERING LOCUS T1, suggesting that it plays a central role in the photoperiodic control of both generative and vegetative growth in strawberry. In conclusion, we propose that Fv SOC1 is a signaling hub that regulates yearly cycles of vegetative and generative development through separate genetic pathways.     

Genetic interactions reveal the antagonistic roles of FT/TSF and TFL1 in the determination of inflorescence meristem identity in Arabidopsis

During the transition to the reproductive phase, the shoot apical meristem switches from the developmental program that generates vegetative organs to instead produce flowers. In this study, we examined the genetic interactions of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)/TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) and TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) in the determination of inflorescence meristem identity in Arabidopsis thaliana. The ft‐10 tsf‐1 mutants produced a compact inflorescence surrounded by serrated leaves (hyper‐vegetative shoot) at the early bolting stage, as did plants overexpressing TFL1. Plants overexpressing FT or TSF (or both FT and TFL1) generated a terminal flower, as did tfl1‐20 mutants. The terminal flower formed in tfl1‐20 mutants converted to a hyper‐vegetative shoot in ft‐10 tsf‐1 mutants. Grafting ft‐10 tsf‐1 or ft‐10 tsf‐1 tfl1‐20 mutant scions to 35S::FT rootstock plants produced a normal inflorescence and a terminal flower in the scion plants, respectively, although both scions showed similar early flowering. Misexpression of FT in the vasculature and in the shoot apex in wild‐type plants generated a normal inflorescence and a terminal flower, respectively. By contrast, in ft‐10 tsf‐1 mutants the vasculature‐specific misexpression of FT converted the hyper‐vegetative shoot to a normal inflorescence, and in the ft‐10 tsf‐1 tfl1‐20 mutants converted the shoot to a terminal flower. TFL1 levels did not affect the inflorescence morphology caused by FT/TSF overexpression at the early bolting stage. Taking these results together, we proposed that FT/TSF and TFL1 play antagonistic roles in the determination of inflorescence meristem identity, and that FT/TSF are more important than TFL1 in this process.     

CONSTANS delays Arabidopsis flowering under short days

Long days (LD) promote flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana compared with short days (SD) by activating the photoperiodic pathway. Here we show that growth under very‐SD (3 h) or darkness (on sucrose) also accelerates flowering on a biological scale, indicating that SD actively repress flowering compared with very‐SD. CONSTANS (CO) repressed flowering under SD, and the early flowering of co under SD required FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT). FT was expressed at a basal level in the leaves under SD, but these levels were not enhanced in co. This indicates that the action of CO in A. thaliana is not the mirror image of the action of its homologue in rice. In the apex, CO enhanced the expression of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) around the time when FT expression is important to promote flowering. Under SD, the tfl1 mutation was epistatic to co and in turn ft was epistatic to tfl1. These observations are consistent with the long‐standing but not demonstrated model where CO can inhibit FT induction of flowering by affecting TFL1 expression.     

Cloning and Characterization of FLOWERING LOCUS T-Like Genes from the Perennial Geophyte Saffron Crocus (Crocus sativus)

The transition to flowering is one of the most important developmental decisions made by plants. At the molecular level, many genes coordinate this transition. Among these, genes encoding for phosphatidylethanolamine-binding proteins (PEBPs) play important roles in regulating flower time and the fate of inflorescence meristem. To investigate the role of PEBPs in an industrially important crop cultivated for its nutritional and medicinal properties, the monocotyledonous species Crocus sativus L., we have isolated three FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)-like genes designated as CsatFT1-like, CsatFT2-like, and CsatFT3-like. The isolated genes maintain the exon/intron organization of FT-like genes and encode proteins similar to the members of the PEBP family. Phylogenetic and amino acid analysis at critical positions confirmed that the isolated sequence belongs to the FT clade of the PEBP family phylogeny distinctly from the TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) and MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 clades. Expression analysis indicated differences in the expression of the three FT-like genes in different organs and different expressions during the day–night diurnal clock. Additionally, analysis of isolated promoter sequences using computational methods reveals the preservation of common binding motifs in FT-like promoters from other species, thus suggesting their importance among plant species.