Differential binding of chromosomal proteins HMG1 and HMG2 to superhelical DNA

The binding of chromosomal proteins HMG1 and HMG2 to various DNA structures was examined by a nitrocellulose filter binding assay using a 32P labelled supercoiled plasmid. Binding assays and competition experiments indicated that HMG2 has a higher affinity than HMG1 for supercoiled DNA. Studies at various ionic strengths and pH values reveal differences in the interaction of the two proteins with DNA. The results suggest that HMG1 and HMG2 are involved in distinguishable cellular functions.     

Nonhistone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 unwind DNA double helix.

In a previous communication we have shown that both HMG1 and HMG2 nonhistone proteins change the DNA helical structure and the binding of HMG1 and HMG2 to DNA induces a net unwinding equivalent of DNA double helix (Javaherian, K., Liu, L. F. and Wang, J. C. (1978) Science, 199, 1345-1346). Employing melting absorption technique, we now show that in the presence of salt HMG1 and HMG2 destabilize DNA whereas in the absence of salt, they both stabilize DNA molecules. Consequently the folded structure of HMG must play an important role in melting DNA. Furthermore, by measuring topological winding number using competition unwinding experiments, we conclude that HMG1 has a higher affinity for a single-stranded DNA relative to double-stranded DNA. These results together suggest that HMG1 and HMG2 unwind DNA double helix by local denaturation of the DNA base pairs. The net unwinding angles have been measured to be 22 degrees and 26 degrees per molecule of HMG1 and HMG2 respectively.     

Nonhistone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 suppress the nucleosome assembly at physiological ionic strength

The effect of nonhistone protein HMG1 and HMG2 from pig thymus on the in vitro nucleosome assembly has been examined with plasmid pSV2-gpt DNA and pig thymus core histones in the presence of DNA topoisomerase I. In the absence of core histones, the direct binding of HMG proteins could induce negative superhelical turns in DNA at low ionic strength, but not at physiological ionic strength. The nucleosome formation in the higher histone-to-DNA ratios at physiological ionic strength was not facilitated by HMG proteins, in contrast to poly(L-glutamic acid). HMG proteins suppressed the nucleosome assembly in the moderate histone-to-DNA ratios, resulting in the reduction of fully supercoiled DNA topoisomers. The suppression by HMG proteins was not cancelled by poly(L-glutamic acid). These suggest that the highly acidic carboxy terminal of HMG proteins does not act as an assembly factor, and that the HMG proteins, on the contrary, suppress the nucleosome formation, probably by binding to DNA in a way to inhibit the assembly into core particles.     

DNA binding by single HMG box model proteins

The HMG1/2 family is a large group of proteins that share a conserved sequence of ~80 amino acids rich in basic, aromatic and proline side chains, referred to as an HMG box. Previous studies show that HMG boxes can bind to DNA in a structure-specific manner. To define the basis for DNA recognition by HMG boxes, we characterize the interaction of two model HMG boxes, one a structure-specific box, rHMGb from the rat HMG1 protein, the other a sequence-specific box, Rox1 from yeast, with oligodeoxynucleotide substrates. Both proteins interact with single-stranded oligonucleotides in this study to form 1:1 complexes. The stoichiometry of binding of rHMGb to duplex or branched DNAs differs: for a 16mer duplex we find a weak 2:1 complex, while a 4:1 protein:DNA complex is detected with a four-way DNA junction of 16mers in the presence of Mg²⁺. In the case of the sequence-specific Rox1 protein we find tight 1:1 and 2:1 complexes with its cognate duplex sequence and again a 4:1 complex with four-way branched DNA. If the DNA branching is reduced to three arms, both proteins form 3:1 complexes. We believe that these multimeric complexes are relevant for HMG1/2 proteins in vivo, since Mg²⁺ is present in the nucleus and these proteins are expressed at a very high level.     

High affinity binding of proteins HMG1 and HMG2 to semicatenated DNA loops

Background  

Proteins HMG1 and HMG2 are two of the most abundant non histone proteins in the nucleus of mammalian cells, and contain a domain of homology with many proteins implicated in the control of development, such as the sex-determination factor Sry and the Sox family of proteins. In vitro studies of interactions of HMG1/2 with DNA have shown that these proteins can bind to many unusual DNA structures, in particular to four-way junctions, with binding affinities of 10⁷ to 10⁹ M^-1.     

The effect of the acidic tail on the DNA-binding properties of the HMG1,2 class of proteins: insights from tail switching and tail removal

The high-mobility group (HMG) proteins HMG1, HMG2 and HMG2a are relatively abundant vertebrate DNA-binding and bending proteins that bind with structure specificity, rather than sequence specificity, and appear to play an architectural role in the assembly of nucleoprotein complexes. They have two homologous "HMG-box" DNA-binding domains (which show about 80 % homology) connected by a short basic linker to an acidic carboxy-terminal tail that differs in length between HMG1 and 2. To gain insights into the role of the acidic tail, we examined the DNA-binding properties of HMG1, HMG2b and HMG2a from chicken erythrocytes (corresponding to HMG1, HMG2 and HMG2a in other vertebrates). HMG1, with the longest acidic tail, is less effective than HMG2a and 2b (at a given molar input ratio) in supercoiling relaxed, closed circular DNA, in inducing ligase-mediated circularisation of an 88 bp DNA fragment, and in binding to four-way DNA junctions in a gel-shift assay. Removal of the acidic tail increases the affinity of the HMG boxes for DNA and largely abolishes the differences between the three species. Switching the acidic tail of HMG1 for that of HMG2a or 2b gives hybrid proteins with essentially the same DNA-binding properties as HMG2a, 2b. The length (and possibly sequence) of the acidic tail thus appears to be the dominant factor in mediating the differences in properties between HMG1, 2a and 2b and finely tunes the rather similar DNA-binding properties of the tandem HMG boxes, presumably to fulfill different cellular roles. The tail is essential for structure-selective DNA-binding of the HMG boxes to DNA minicircles in the presence of equimolar linear DNA, and has little effect on the affinity for this already highly distorted DNA ligand, in contrast to binding to linear and four-way junction DNA.     

Binding of high-mobility-group proteins HMG 14 and HMG 17 to DNA and histone H1 as influenced by phosphorylation

We have used affinity chromatography to study the effects of phosphorylation of calf thymus high-mobility-group proteins HMG 14 and HMG 17 on their binding properties towards calf thymus single- and double-stranded DNA and histone H1. Without in vitro phosphorylation, HMG 14 and HMG17 eluted from doble-stranded DNA-columns at 200 mM NaCl. HMG 14 was released from single-stranded DNA-column at 300 mM NaCl and from H1-column at 130 mM NaCl, whereas the corresponding values for HMG 17 were 230 mM and 20 mM, respectively. Phosphorylation of HMG 14 and HMG 17 by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (A-kinase) decreased markedly their affinity (270 mM and 200 mM NaCl, respectively) for single-stranded DNA, whereas HMG 14 phosphorylated by nuclear protein kinase II (NII-kinase) eluted only slightly (290 mM NaCl) ahead of the unphosphorylated protein. HMG 14 phosphorylated by both A-kinase and NII-kinase eluted from double-stranded DNA-columns almost identically (190 mM NaCl) with the unphosphorylated protein. Interestingly, phosphorylation of HMG 14 by NII-kinase increased considerably its affinity for histone H1 and the phosphorylated protein eluted at 200 mM NaCl. Phosphorylation of HMG 14 by A-kinase did not alter its interaction towards histone H1. These results indicate that modification of HMG 14 by phosphorylation at specific sites may have profound effects on its binding properties towards DNA and histone H1, and that HMG 17 has much weaker affinity for single-stranded DNA and histone H1 than HMG 14.     

Interaction of non-histone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 with core histones in nucleosomes and core particles revealed by chemical cross-linking

Chemical cross-linking was used to study the interaction of the non-histone chromosomal proteins HMG1 and HMG2 with core histones in H1,H5-depleted nucleosomes or core particles. Cross-linking with a 'zero-length' cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide and with a longer (cleavable) cross-linker dimethyl-3,3'-dithiobispropionimidate revealed an interaction of HMG1 and HMG2 with (or proximity to) core histones in both types of particles. These results indicated that the presence of the 40-50-base-pairs-long segment of the 'linker' DNA in nucleosomes was not necessary for the establishment of mutual contacts of HMG1 and HMG2 proteins with core histones. Possible implications of the interaction of HMG1 and HMG2 proteins with histones for the structure and functioning of chromatin are discussed.     

DNA intercalators induce specific release of HMG 14, HMG 17 and other DNA-binding proteins from chicken erythrocyte chromatin.

Chicken erythrocyte nuclei were incubated with DNA intercalating agents in order to isolate from chromatin specific DNA-binding proteins whose binding specificity may be determined by DNA secondary and/or tertiary structure. The intercalating agents ethidium bromide (EtBr) and propidium iodide induce the specific release of high mobility group proteins HMG 14 and HMG 17 under low ionic strength conditions. Chloroquine (CQ) intercalation also results in the selective liberation of HMG 14 and HMG 17, but, in addition, selectively releases other nuclear proteins (including histone H1A) in a pH- and ionic strength-dependent fashion. The use of this new 'elutive intercalation' technique for the isolation and purification of 'sequence-specific' and 'helix-specific' DNA-binding proteins is suggested.     

Hierarchy of binding sites for chromosomal proteins HMG 1 and 2 in supercoiled deoxyribonucleic acid

The interaction of chromosomal proteins HMG 1 and 2 with various DNA structures has been examined with plasmid pPst-0.9, which contains DNA sequences that can form the Z-DNA conformation and palindromic sequences that can form cruciform structures. Direct binding and competition experiments with 32P-labeled plasmid indicated that proteins HMG 1 and 2 preferentially bind to supercoiled form I DNA as compared to double-stranded linear DNA. The preferential binding to form I is due to the presence of single-stranded regions in this DNA. The binding of HMG 1 and 2 to the form I plasmid results in inhibition of S1 nuclease digestion in a selective manner. The B-Z junction is preferentially protected as compared to the cruciform, which in turn is more protected than other minor S1-sensitive structures present in pPst-0.9. Our results indicate that the binding of HMG 1 and 2 proteins to DNA is not random in that HMG 1 and 2 can distinguish between various S1 nuclease sensitive sites in the plasmid. The existence of a hierarchy of DNA binding sites for these proteins suggests that they can selectively affect the structure of distinct regions in the genome.     

Four differently chromatin‐associated maize HMG domain proteins modulate DNA structure and act as architectural elements in nucleoprotein complexes

In contrast to other eukaryotes which usually express two closely related HMG1-like proteins, plant cells have multiple relatively variable proteins of this type. A systematic analysis of the DNA-binding properties of four chromosomal HMG domain proteins from maize revealed that they bind linear DNA with similar affinity. HMGa, HMGc1/2 and HMGd specifically recognise diverse DNA structures such as DNA mini-circles and supercoiled DNA. They induce DNA-bending, and constrain negative superhelical turns in DNA. In the presence of DNA, the HMG domain proteins can self-associate, whereas they are monomeric in solution. The maize HMG1-like proteins have the ability to facilitate the formation of nucleoprotein structures to different extents, since they can efficiently replace a bacterial chromatin-associated protein required for the site-specific β-mediated recombination. A variable function of the HMG1-like proteins is indicated by their differential association with maize chromatin, as judged by their ‘extractability’ from chromatin with spermine and ethidium bromide. Collectively, these findings suggest that the various plant chromosomal HMG domain proteins could be adapted to act in different nucleoprotein structures in vivo.     

Immunochemical studies of high mobility group non-histone chromatin proteins HMG 1 and HMG 2

Sera were raised to non-histone chromatin proteins HMG 1 and HMG 2. Immunoperoxidase staining localised these proteins on chromosomes during mitosis and indicated a cell cycle-related variation in these proteins during interphase. Some species differences in HMG 1 and HMG 2 were also observed.     

Interaction of high mobility group proteins HMG 1 and HMG 2 with nucleosomes studied by gel electrophoresis

The binding of isolated high mobility group proteins HMG (1+2) with nucleosomes was studied using gel electrophoresis. The interaction of HMG (1+2) with mononucleosomes could be detected as a new discrete electrophoretic band with a decreased mobility only after cross-linking of HMG (1+2)-nucleosome complex by formaldehyde. Approximately two molecules of the large HMG proteins were bound per nucleosomal particle of a DNA length of 185 base pairs, lacking histones H1 and H5. Using the same techniques, no binding was observed with core particles of a DNA length of 145 base pairs.     

HMG chromosomal proteins in development and disease

The high mobility group (HMG) proteins are a superfamily of abundant and ubiquitous nuclear proteins that bind to DNA and nucleosomes and induce structural changes in the chromatin fiber. They are important in chromatin dynamics and influence DNA processing in the context of chromatin. Results emerging from studies of human disease, genetically modified mice and cells with altered HMG expression indicate that the expression of the HMG proteins is developmentally regulated and that changes in HMG protein levels alter the cellular phenotype and can lead to developmental abnormalities and disease. Here, we focus on the biological function of HMG proteins and highlight their possible roles in cellular differentiation and in the etiology of various diseases.     

The in vitro reconstitution of nucleosome and its binding patterns with HMG1／2 and HMG14／17 proteins

Using atomic force microscopy (AFM), the dynamic process of the in vitro nucleosome reconstitution followed by slow dilution from high salt to low salt was visualized. Data showed that the histone octamers were dissociatedfrom DNA at 1M NaC1. When the salt concentration was slowly reduced to 650 mM and 300 mM, the core histones bound to the naked DNA gradually. Once the salt concentration was reduced to 50 mM the classic “beads-on-a-string“ structure was clearly visualized. Furthermore, using the technique of the in vitro reconstitution of nucleosome,the mono- and di- nucleosomes were assembled in vitro with both HS2core (-10681 to -10970 bp) and NCR2 (-372to -194 bp) DNA sequences in the 5‘flanking sequence of human b-globin gene. Data revealed that HMG 1/2 and HMG 14/17 proteins binding to both DNA sequences are changeable following the assembly and disassembly of nucleosomes. We suggest that the changeable binding patterns of HMG 14/17 and HMG1/2 proteins with these regulatory elements may be critical in the process of nucleosome assembly, recruitment of chromatin-modifying activities, and the regulation of human b-globin gene expression.     

Comparative studies on microinjected high-mobility-group chromosomal proteins, HMG1 and HMG2

The nonhistone chromosomal proteins, HMG1 and HMG2, were iodinated and introduced into HeLa cells, bovine fibroblasts, or mouse 3T3 cells by erythrocyte-mediated microinjection. Autoradiographic analysis of injected cells fixed with glutaraldehyde consistently showed both molecules concentrated within nuclei. Fixation with methanol, on the other hand, resulted in some leakage of the microinjected proteins from the nuclei so that more autoradiographic grains appeared over the cytoplasm or outside the cells. Both injected and endogenous HMG1 and HMG2 partitioned unexpectedly upon fractionation of bovine fibroblasts, HeLa, or 3T3 cells, appearing in the cytoplasmic fractions. However, in calf thymus, HMG1 and HMG2 molecules appeared in the 0.35 M NaCl extract of isolated nuclei, as expected. These observations show that the binding of HMG1 and HMG2 to chromatin differs among cell types or that other tissue-specific components can influence their binding. Coinjection of [125I]HMG1 and [131I]HMG2 into HeLa cells revealed that the two molecules display virtually equivalent distributions upon cell fractionation, identical stability, identical intracellular distributions, and equal rates of equilibration between nuclei. In addition, HMG1 and HMG2 did not differ in their partitioning upon fractionation nor in their stability in growing vs. nongrowing 3T3 cells. Thus, we have not detected any significant differences in the intracellular behavior of HMG1 and HMG2 after microinjection into human, bovine, or murine cells.     

The DNA binding site of HMG1 protein is composed of two similar segments (HMG boxes), both of which have counterparts in other eukaryotic regulatory proteins.

The mammalian nuclear protein HMG1 contains two segments that show a high sequence similarity to each other. Each of the segments, produced separately from the rest of the protein in Escherichia coli, binds to DNA with high specificity: four-way junction DNA of various sequences is bound efficiently, but linear duplex DNA is not. Both isolated segments exists as dimers in solution, as shown by gel filtration and chemical crosslinking experiments. HMG1-like proteins are present in yeast and in protozoa: they consist of a single repetition of a motif extremely similar to the DNA binding segments of HMG1, suggesting that they too might form dimers with structural specificity in DNA binding. Sequences with recognizable similarity to either of the two DNA binding segments of HMG1, called HMG boxes, also occur in a few eukaryotic regulatory proteins. However, these proteins are reported to bind to specific sequences, suggesting that the HMG box of proteins distantly related to HMG1 might differ significantly from the HMG box of HMG1-like proteins.     

Differences between HMG1 proteins isolated from normal and tumour cells

The properties of the non-histone chromosomal high-mobility-group 1 (HMG1) proteins from rat liver and Guerin ascites tumour cells (GAT cells) were compared and showed the following differences: (1) five spots were missing in the peptide map of HMG1 from GAT cells in comparison with that of HMG1 from rat liver; (2) HMG1 from GAT cells was about 5-times more poly(ADP)-ribosylated; (3) HMG1 from GAT cells which was found acetylated in vivo and incorporated [14C]acetate in vitro, whereas no incorporation of the label was detected in HMG1 from rat liver; (4) HMG1 from GAT cells exhibited pronounced ability to form oligomers at physiological ionic strength, while HMG1 from rat liver was predominantly in monomeric form. This property of HMG1 from GAT cells was lost upon deacetylation.